Next Article in Journal
“Golden” Tomato Consumption Ameliorates Metabolic Syndrome: A Focus on the Redox Balance in the High-Fat-Diet-Fed Rat
Next Article in Special Issue
Kinetics and Mechanism of Epinephrine Autoxidation in the Presence of Plant Superoxide Inhibitors: A New Look at the Methodology of Using a Model System in Biological and Chemical Research
Previous Article in Journal
Quality-by-Design R&D of a Novel Nanozyme-Based Sensor for Saliva Antioxidant Capacity Evaluation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of the Drying Method and Optimization of Extraction on Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic of Rose Petals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fruit Peel Powder as Natural Antioxidant and Reinforcing Bio-Filler in Natural Rubber Latex Gloves: Cases of Mangosteen, Pomelo and Durian

by
Arkarapol Thumwong
1,2,
Jitsuna Darachai
2,
Nuatawan Thamrongsiripak
3,
Shinji Tokonami
4,
Tetsuo Ishikawa
5 and
Kiadtisak Saenboonruang
2,6,7,8,*
1
Department of Materials Science, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
2
Special Research Unit of Radiation Technology for Advanced Materials (RTAM), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
3
Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology (Public Organization), Nakhorn Nayok 26120, Thailand
4
Institute of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki University, Aomori 0368564, Japan
5
Department of Radiation Physics and Chemistry, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 9601295, Japan
6
Department of Applied Radiation and Isotopes, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
7
Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
8
Specialized Center of Rubber and Polymer Materials in Agriculture and Industry (RPM), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(5), 1119; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051119
Submission received: 24 April 2023 / Revised: 4 May 2023 / Accepted: 15 May 2023 / Published: 18 May 2023

Abstract

:
As the world is facing rapid increases in agricultural wastes that greatly affect global health, the environment, and economies, this work aims to alleviate such issues by introducing simple uses of waste fruit peel powder (FPP) derived from mangosteen (MPP), pomelo (PPP), or durian (DPP), as dual natural antioxidants and reinforcing bio-fillers in natural rubber latex (NRL) gloves. A thorough investigation was undertaken of the relevant characteristics for both FPP (morphological, functional groups, particle sizes, and thermals stability) and NRL gloves (morphological, functional groups, density, color, thermal stability, and mechanical properties—both before and after thermal/25 kGy gamma aging). The results indicated that the initial addition (2–4 parts per hundred parts of rubber by weight; phr) of FPP to NRL composites generally enhanced the strength and elongation at the break of the specimens, with the levels of the improvement varying depending on the type and content of FPPs. In addition to the reinforcing effects, the FPP also offered natural antioxidant properties, evidenced by higher values of aging coefficients for all FPP/NRL gloves under either thermal or 25 kGy gamma aging than those of pristine NRL. Furthermore, by comparing the tensile strength and elongation at break of the developed FPP/NRL gloves with the requirements for medical examination latex gloves according to ASTM D3578-05, the recommended FPP contents for actual glove production were 2–4 phr for MPP, 4 phr for PPP, and 2 phr for DPP. Consequently, based on the overall outcomes, the FPPs of interest showed promising potential for utilization as simultaneous natural antioxidants and reinforcing bio-fillers in NRL gloves, which would not only enhance the strength and ability of the gloves to resist oxidative degradation from heat and gamma irradiation but also increase their economical value as well as reducing the amounts of the investigated wastes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Rapid increases in the disposal of agricultural and food wastes have become global environmental and health concerns that are worsening the quality of living for both current and future generations [1,2]. To address these worrisome issues, various attempts have been made to reduce the amount of waste disposal, including the utilization of biodegradable materials and smart farming, as well as the recycling/upcycling of wastes for the production of advanced materials [3,4,5,6,7]. Among these wastes, fruit peels, which contain high contents of lignocellulosic biomass and bioactive compounds [8], can be reused in a variety of applications, including low-cost absorbent materials, edible coatings/films on food surfaces, natural antimicrobial agents, biological reduction agents for the synthesis of nanoparticles, and as an advanced organic resistive switching memory device [9,10,11,12,13,14].
In addition to these examples, fruit peels, which offer antioxidant properties due to their diverse compositions of phytochemicals, such as carotenoids and phenolic compounds, could replace some of the commercially available but highly toxic antioxidants used in conventional rubber products such as Wingstay L [15,16,17]. The importance of antioxidants is especially emphasized in the case of natural rubber (NR) products due to their highly unsaturated hydrocarbons of poly(cis-1,4-isoprene) in NR molecular chains that make them highly sensitive to oxidative degradation from ozone, heat, and radiation [18]. In particular, for natural latex gloves, the oxidative degradation during the process of product preparation, sterilization, and storage could noticeably reduce the usability and shelf-life of the gloves. For instance, the NRL films (without any antioxidants) suffered a great decrease in tensile strength from 13 MPa in a non-aged sample to less than 10 MPa in a thermal-aged sample (reduced by also 25%), which was lower than the requirement for latex gloves used in food and medical sectors [19]. This reduction in the mechanical properties was due to the lack of antioxidants in the samples that could convert free radicals into more stable products and end the degradation. Some examples of published studies reporting the promising antioxidant properties in fruit peels include the work of Suleria et al., who showed that the extracts from grapefruit peels, avocado peels, and mango peels had high radical-scavenging effects (RSEs) of 9.17 ± 0.19 mg (Ascorbic Acid Equivalent) AAE/g, 8.67 ± 0.44 mg AAE/g, and 8.67 ± 0.49 mg AAE/g, respectively, evaluated using a 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay method [20]. In addition, Zhang et al. reported that the extracts from the peels of 19 different mandarins (Citrus reticulata Blanco) had an average RSE of 21.92 mg/g (dry weight) DW [21], implying a high antioxidant ability of the peels. Subsequently, based on the promising reports, Sukatta et al. explored the advantages of fruit peels as natural antioxidants by introducing extracted rambutan peel powder (eRPP) to a conventional vulcanized NR. The investigation indicated that the eRPP had similar antioxidant activities with those of a commercial antioxidant, namely N-(1,3-Dimethylbutyl)-N′-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine (6PPD), while the addition of at least 1 part per hundred parts of rubber by weight (phr) of eRPP to rubber vulcanizates resulted in the prepared rubber specimens having similar abilities to resist thermal aging and ozone aging as those using 6PPD and 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline (TMQ) at the same content [17].
Despite having high antioxidant properties, the procedure to introduce fruit peels to NR composites usually requires some hazardous chemicals and high heat to extract active compounds from the peels [17,22], consequently limiting the useability and processibility of the substances, as well as raising environmental and health concerns. To alleviate such drawbacks, a more environmentally friendly and simpler method to utilize fruit peels was introduced by Mahir and Ismail, who simply mixed 2 phr of dried mangosteen peel powder (MPP) with NR and then compared the mechanical properties of the NR specimens with those using commercial antioxidants. The results indicated that the thermal-aged MPP/NR composites had higher tensile strength and elongation at break than those of the NR with the commercial antioxidants, determined for the same filler content and aging conditions, implying the effectiveness of MPP as natural antioxidants [23]. Furthermore, their report offered a much simpler procedure to utilize fruit peels in NR products that reduced preparation steps and the amounts of chemicals/energy required in the common extraction procedure.
In addition to being natural antioxidants, fruit peels contain high contents of lignocellulosic biomass [24], making them suitable for the reinforcement of NR products. Generally, cellulosic fibers, such as those from oil palm, sisal, pineapple leaf, and banana stem, have been utilized as reinforcing bio-fillers in NR composites [25,26], as reported by Sivasubramanian et al., who showed that the addition of 35.1 wt% untreated pineapple leaf fibers (PALF) to NR composites enhanced tensile strength, tear strength, and hardness (Shore A) from ~10 MPa, ~32 N/mm, and ~35, respectively, in pristine NR to ~11 MPa, ~79 N/mm, and ~68, respectively, in the PALF/NR composites [27], indicating the reinforcing effects of adding cellulosic fibers to NR composites. However, in contrast to fibers, there are only a few available reports of fruit peels being utilized as reinforcing bio-fillers in NR products. For instance, Mahir and Ismail, who added 2 phr dried MPP to NR, reported that the tensile modulus at 100% elongation, tensile strength, and elongation at break was enhanced from 55.83 MPa, 6.04 MPa, and 27.30%, respectively, in pristine NR to 138.99 MPa, 26.54 MPa, and 44.64%, respectively, in the MPP/NR composites [23], clearly showing the reinforcing effects of MPP on NR products, which could widen potential applications of NRL products to those requiring high strength and elongation at break, especially in medical, electronic, and food sectors.
As mentioned above, the great potential and attractive benefits of fruit peels as natural antioxidants and reinforcing bio-fillers, as well as the limited availability of in-depth reports on their utilization in NR products, have driven the need for wider and more thorough investigations. Hence, the current work aimed to investigate the dual antioxidant and reinforcing effects of fruit peel powder (FPP), derived from mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana), pomelo (Citrus maxima), and durian (Durio zibethinus L.), on the properties of NRL gloves. The properties of interest for FPPs investigated in this work included morphological (scanning electron microscopy; SEM), active functional groups (Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy; FTIR), particle sizes, and thermal stability (thermogravimetric analysis; TGA) properties, while the properties of interest for FPP/NRL gloves with varying FPP contents from 0 to 2, 4, and 6 phr included morphological (SEM), active functional groups (FTIR), physical (density and color index), thermal stability (TGA), and mechanical (tensile modulus, tensile strength, and elongation at break—both before and after thermal/25 kGy gamma aging) properties. It should be noted that the gamma aging of 25 kGy on the specimens was carried out in this work in order to replicate the common method to sterilize single-use NRL gloves via gamma irradiation. The outcomes from this work not only present valuable information on the antioxidant and reinforcing properties of the FPP on NRL gloves but also offer a simpler and more environmentally friendly method to utilize waste fruit peels in rubber products, which could be used as a basis for the development of other materials.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Chemicals

High-ammonia natural rubber latex (HA-NRL) was supplied by the Office of Rubber Authority of Thailand (RAOT), Bangkok, Thailand. The HA-NRL used for sample preparation had total solid and dry rubber contents of 61.0% (ISO 124:2014) and 60.3% (ISO 126:2005), respectively [28]. Other chemicals, with their respective contents and roles, are shown in Table 1. The fruit peel powder (FPP), consisting of mangosteen peel powder (MPP), pomelo peel powder (PPP), and durian peel powder (DPP), was obtained from local fruit markets in Bangkok, Thailand; distilled water was supplied by the Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand; and other chemicals were supplied by the RAOT (Bangkok, Thailand). Prior to the sample preparation, all chemicals and substances except KOH and Teric 16A16 were prepared into solutions by mixing each chemical with ammonia, vultamol, bentonite, and distilled water for 24 h in a stainless-steel ball mill (the final weight content for FPP-to-ammonia-to-vultamol-to-bentonite-to-distilled water was 10:10:1:1:78, while the final weight content for other chemical-to-vultamol-to-bentonite-to-distilled water was 50:1:1:48). This additional step in preparing chemical solutions was introduced to ensure improved compatibility between all chemicals and the NRL matrix during the sample preparation, which could reduce voids and particle agglomerations as well as enable the chemicals to perform at their fullest capacities. Notably, the formulation and procedure for sample preparation in this work were based on our previous work relating to the development of X-ray shielding NRL gloves [16,28], while FPPs were introduced to the formulation in order to determine their potential to replace conventional antioxidants in NR products such as 6PPD and TMQ [17].
To prepare FPP for sample preparation, the obtained mangosteen peels, pomelo peels, and durian peels were cut into small pieces and dried under sunlight for 2–3 days. Then, the dried fruit peels were ground into fine particles using a grinder (HR-1500W, Energy789 Co., Ltd.; Bangkok, Thailand) and passed through a 60-mesh sieve. Micrograph images using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Quanta 450 FEI JSM-6610LV; Eindhoven, The Netherlands) as well as optical images of the prepared MPP, PPP, and DPP are shown in Figure 1, which indicates that the FPPs were irregular flakes, with average ± standard deviation particle sizes of 71.9 ± 8.8 µm, 62.2 ± 8.0 µm, and 83.4 ± 5.5 µm for MPP, PPP, and DPP, respectively (determined using the ImageJ software version 1.50i, provided by the National Institutes of Health and the Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA). Figure 1d–f shows that the colors of ground MPP, PPP, and DPP were roughly maroon, off-white, and light brown, respectively.

2.2. Preparation of FPP/NRL Mixture

The NRL was continuously stirred using an automatic top stirrer (Eurostar 60 digital; IKA; Bangkok, Thailand) at a rotation speed of 300 rpm for 60 min. Next, KOH, Teric 16A16, S, ZDEC, ZMBT, ZnO, and distilled water were added sequentially to NRL with a 2 min interval between each chemical, after which the mixture was continuously stirred for another 60 min. Then, the NRL mixture was stored in a closed container at room temperature for 72 h to allow the pre-vulcanization process to occur, prior to the addition of each FPP into separate mixtures. After the addition of FPP, the stirring was continued for another 60 min, and the mixture was later kept in a closed container for further steps.

2.3. Preparation of FPP/NRL Gloves

To prepare the FPP/NRL gloves, the ceramic molds were thoroughly washed, rinsed, and oven-dried at 80 °C for 40 min. Then, the molds were dipped in a 35% coagulant, consisting of Ca(NO3)2, Teric 16A16, 50% CaCO3, and distilled water (RAOT, Bangkok, Thailand) with final weight contents of 35.0:0.1:5.0:59.9, respectively, for 5 s to improve rubber adhesion to the molds [16,28,29]. After coagulant dipping, the molds were oven-dried at 80 °C for 2 min before being dipped in the FPP/NRL mixture for 30 s, carefully flicked, rotated (multiple times), and oven-dried at 110 °C for 50 min. Lastly, the FPP/NRL gloves were peeled off the molds and kept in polyethylene (PE) bags with a relative humidity of 55–60% and a temperature of 24–26 °C for further use and testing.

2.4. Thermal and Gamma Aging of FPP/NRL Gloves

To determine the ability of the FPP/NRL gloves to resist oxidative degradation due to heat, the samples were placed in a hot-air oven at 100 °C for 22 h, following the ASTM D3578-19 standard testing procedure [30]. In addition, since latex gloves used in medical, electronic, and food applications are usually required to be sterilized to prevent the growth of microorganisms on the glove surface [31], the effects of gamma aging on the FPP/NRL gloves were investigated by irradiating all samples with 25 kGy gamma rays using a 60Co source at the Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology (Public Organization) (Nakhon Nayok, Thailand). The changes in mechanical properties for all samples under thermal and gamma aging were determined and compared with non-aged samples. Notably, the dose of 25 kGy was selected for gamma aging because typical doses for sterilization of medical devices are in the range of 25–50 kGy [32].

2.5. Characterization

2.5.1. Thermal Stability and Functional Groups

To determine the thermal stability of both the FPPs and FPP/NRL gloves, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA; TGA/DSC 3+; Mettler-Toledo; Greifensee, Switzerland) was conducted on all samples using a temperature range of 30–700 °C. The procedure was conducted at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere [33]. The active functional groups of the FPPs and FPP/NRL gloves were determined using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) (Vertex 70, Bruker, San Jose, CA, USA), with wavenumbers in the range of 500–4000 cm−1.

2.5.2. Morphology, Density, and Color

The morphology of the FPP/NRL gloves was determined using SEM (Quanta 450 FEI, JSM-6610LV; Eindhoven, The Netherlands). All samples were coated with gold to improve the signal-to-noise ratio using a sputter coater (Quorum SC7620; Mini Sputter Coater/Glow Discharge System; Laughton, UK) prior to taking the SEM images [34].
The density of the FPP/NRL gloves was determined using a densitometer (MH-300A; Shanghai, China) with a precision of 0.001 g/cm3. The determination was carried out based on Archimedes’ principle [35].
The colors of the FPP/NRL gloves were systematically determined using a color index measurement based on UV-Vis-NIR spectrometry (SolidSpec-3700; Shimadzu; Kyoto, Japan) in transmittance mode with a wavelength range of 380–750 nm and a standard lighting source C, following the CIE-L*a*b* colorimetric method recommended by the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE) (Vienna, Austria). The color parameters used in this work were L*, a*, and b*, which represent the color positions of the samples in a lightness axis, a blue–yellow axis, and a green–red axis, respectively [36]. To compare changes in colors after the addition of each FPP to the NRL gloves, the color difference (ΔE) between a pristine NRL glove and each FPP/NRL glove was calculated using Equation (1):
E = L a * L o * 2 + a a * a o * 2 + b a * b o * 2
where the parameters with the subscripts “a” and “o” represent the values obtained from aged samples and non-aged samples, respectively. It should be noted that the measurements of density and color for each NRL glove were carried out with at least three repetitions.

2.5.3. Radical-Scavenging Capacity

The antioxidant properties of the FPPs were determined based on their radical-scavenging capacities using a DPPH assay method [37]. To carry out the measurement, each FPP was extracted using 99.9% ethanol [38], for which the volumes of ethanol were selected such that the final concentrations of:
  • MPP extracts were 0.0125, 0.025, 0.05, or 0.1 mg/mL;
  • PPP extracts were 0.156, 0.625, 2.5, or 10 mg/mL;
  • DPP extracts were 0.781, 3.125, 12.5, or 50 mg/mL.
Then, 0.1 mM of DPPH was allowed to react with the same volume of FPP extracts (1:1, v/v) under continuous stirring in a dark chamber for 30 min. Lastly, the absorbance at 517 nm was measured using a UV-Vis spectrometer (Cary 100 Scan; Thai Unique Co., Ltd.; Bangkok, Thailand) for each extract, and the antioxidant properties of the FPP were then determined based on the radical-scavenging effect (RSE), calculated using Equation (2):
R S E = A c A s A c × 100 %
where Ac and As are the absorbances for a control (only DPPH) and an FPP extract, respectively [39]. The measurement of RSE was carried out for at least three repetitions for each sample.

2.5.4. Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties, consisting of tensile modulus at 500% elongation (TM500), tensile strength (TS), and elongation at break (EB), of non-aged and aged FPP/NRL gloves were determined using a universal testing machine (TM-G5K; TM Tech; Bangkok, Thailand) according to ASTM D412-06 standard testing procedures. The tensile testing speed used for the measurement was 500 mm/min, and each sample was cut into a dumbbell shape (die C) prior to the measurement.
To determine the ability to resist oxidative degradation from heat and radiation based on levels of change in the mechanical properties of the samples after aging, the aging coefficient (Caging) for each sample formulation and aging condition were determined using Equation (3):
C a g i n g = T S a × E B a T S o × E B o
where the parameters with the subscripts “a” and “o” represent the values obtained from aged samples and non-aged samples, respectively [40]. It should be noted that the measurement of mechanical properties for both non-aged and aged samples was carried out with at least three repetitions.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

A level of 95% significance (p < 0.05) was used for the descriptive analysis of the data. The t-test was also applied to determine any significant difference between the results of interest. The statistical analysis was conducted using the statistical analysis package available in Microsoft Excel (New York, NY, USA), and the results are shown in the Supplementary Materials (Tables S1–S26).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characteristics of FPP

3.1.1. Thermal Stability

The thermal stabilities of MPP, PPP, and DPP were determined based on TGA. The results, as shown in Figure 2, indicated that the thermal stabilities of MPP, PPP, and DPP could be divided into three stages. In the first stage, which occurred at temperatures lower than 100 °C (~80 °C), the initial weight losses were due to the release of weak-bonded water molecules in the amorphous region of the FPP [41,42]. The second stage, with the peaks of derivative weights at 200–220 °C, 315–330 °C, and 400–420 °C (Figure 2b), was related to the decompositions of hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin, respectively, in the FPP [41,43]. In the third stage, the weights of all FPPs were relatively unchanged above 500 °C, corresponding to the remains of residue from biochar, mostly composed of lignin [41]. Notably, MPP had a greater amount of remaining residue (35%) than PPP (27%) and DPP (26%). This could have been due to MPP containing higher contents of lignin than PPP and DPP, resulting in more remaining biochar after the decomposition (contents of lignin in MPP, PPP, and DPP were reported to be 48.52%, 3.16%, and 13.6%, respectively [44,45,46]).

3.1.2. Functional Groups

The functional groups of all FPPs, including MPP, PPP, and DPP, determined using FTIR, are shown in Figure 3. The results indicated that all three FPPs exhibited similar active functional groups (only slight differences in magnitudes), with the dominant and important peaks at 1050, 1280, 1446, 1608, 2850, 2920, and 3330 cm−1. The first four peaks at 1050, 1280, 1446, and 1608 cm−1 corresponded to the vibrations of C–O from primary alcohols and those of C–O, C–H, and C=O from ketone, respectively. The next two peaks at 2850 and 2920 cm−1 were due to the vibrations of C–H from methylene groups and methyl groups. The last two dominant peaks at 2920 and 3330 cm−1 were related to the vibrations of O–H from hydroxyl groups, commonly found in cellulose, lignin, and pectin in the FPPs [47].

3.1.3. Radical-Scavenging Capacity

The RSEs of MPP, PPP, and DPP, determined using a DPPH assay method, are shown in Figure 4, which indicates a strong, positive, linear correlation between the RSE and FPP concentration, with R2 values for MPP, PPP, and DPP being 0.940, 0.962, and 0.972, respectively. To estimate and compare the antioxidant capacities of all FPPs in this work, the values of IC50 (the concentration required to obtain 50% of the initial RSE) were determined from the fitted correlations in Figure 4, with the calculated values shown in Table 2. The results revealed that MPP (DPP) had the lowest (highest) IC50 value of 0.1 mg/mL (29.41 mg/mL) (95% confidence level—Table S1), implying the highest (lowest) antioxidant capacity in MPP (DPP). Since bioactive compounds, such as polyphenols (flavonoids, phenolic acid, and lignans), play important roles in defining the antioxidant activity of substances by reacting with free radicals and converting them into more stable products [38], it was reasonable to assume (based on the IC50 values) that MPP contained higher total polyphenolic compounds than PPP or DPP. This was consistent with the works of Wittenauer et al., Xiao et al., and Zhan et al., who reported that MPP, PPP, and DPP contained total polyphenolic compounds of 65.36, 17.99–53.64, and 1.86 mg/g DW, respectively [48,49,50], which made MPP a better antioxidant than PPP and DPP. It should be noted that the equations obtained from the correlations between the RSE and FPP concentration in Figure 4 are shown in Equations (4)–(6):
R S E M P P = 501.21 × c o n c .
R S E P P P = 8.23 × c o n c .
R S E D P P = 1.70 × c o n c .
where RSEMPP, RSEPPP, RSEDPP, and conc. are the radical-scavenging effects of MPP (%), the radical-scavenging effects of PPP (%), the radical-scavenging effects of DPP (%), and the corresponding extract concentrations (mg/mL), respectively. These obtained equations were then used for the calculation of IC50 for each type of FPP.

3.2. Characteristics of FPP/NRL Gloves

3.2.1. Colors

For the MPP/NRL, PPP/NRL, and DPP/NRL gloves, the surface colors and color indices (determined using UV-Vis-NIR spectrometry) are shown in Figure 5 and Table 3, respectively. As shown in Figure 5, the colors of samples clearly changed after the addition of the FPPs to the NRL, with the levels of color change (ΔE) increasing at higher FPP contents (95% confidence level—Tables S2–S4) [51]. Specifically, for the MPP/NRL gloves, which had the most pronounced color changes after the addition of MPP (ΔE as high as 53.1 in the sample containing 6 phr MPP), the values of L* (a* and b*) noticeably decreased (increased) with increasing MPP contents, indicating that the samples became darker (redder and yellower, respectively), which agreed with the actual color of the ground MPP shown in Figure 1d.

3.2.2. Densities

The densities of all FPP/NRL glove samples, shown in Table 4, increased with the addition of FPPs to the glove (95% confidence level—Table S5) due to the higher densities of lignin and cellulose in the FPP (densities of lignin and cellulose have been reported to be 1.35–1.50 g/cm3 and 1.58–1.60 g/cm3, respectively [52]) than those of NRL (0.90 ± 0.02 g/cm3), resulting in an increase in the sample mass for a given volume, after the addition of FPP to the NRL composites.

3.2.3. Thermal Stability

The thermal stabilities of pristine NRL, 6 phr MPP/NRL, 6 phr PPP/NRL, and 6 phr DPP/NRL composites, determined using TGA, are shown in Figure 6. The results revealed that all samples had similar weight loss and thermal stability (Figure 6a), implying that the addition of FPP did not noticeably alter thermal stability in the NRL composites, with the peaks of the derivative weights (Figure 6b) being 80 °C, 280–290 °C, 380, and 400–420 °C. The first peaks at 80 °C corresponded to the release of water molecules that were weakly bound to the NRL matrix and FPP, while the peaks at 280–290 °C and 400–420 °C corresponded to the decompositions of hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin from the added FPP. Lastly, the peaks at 380 °C, which had the highest magnitude of derivative weight loss, corresponded to the decomposition of pure NRL (the main matrix) [53]. Notably, the remaining biochar in 6 phr MPP/NRL (8.2%) was higher than that in the pristine NRL (4.5%), 6 phr PPP/NRL (7.5%), and 6 phr DPP/NRL (4.8%), probably due to MPP having the highest remaining residue in comparison to PPP and DPP, as shown in Figure 2a.

3.2.4. Functional Groups

The functional groups (determined using FTIR) of pristine NRL and NRL gloves containing 6 phr of MPP, PPP, and DPP are shown in Figure 7. The results indicated that all samples had similar dominant peaks (with slight differences in magnitudes), with the important peaks being at 841, 1013, 1080, 1128, 1153, 1375, 1446, 1664, 2850, 2932, 2964, and 3350 cm−1. The peaks at 841, 1375, 2932, and 2964 cm−1 corresponded to the vibrations of C–H from methyl groups (CH3), while the peaks at 1446 and 2850 cm−1 corresponded to the vibrations of C–H from methylene groups (CH2), for which these two groups are parts of the NR molecular chains ((C5H8)n). In addition, the dominant peaks at 1013, 1080, 1128, and 1153 cm−1 were due to the vibrations of C–C, and the peak at 1664 cm−1 was due to the vibration of C=C in the NR molecular backbones. The last peak at 3350 cm−1 corresponded to the vibration of O–H from water molecules as well as lignocellulose in the samples [54]. It should be noted that the addition of FPPs to NRL did not substantially alter active functional groups in this work, probably due to only small FPP contents (up to 6 phr) being added to the NRL matrix.

3.2.5. Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties, consisting of a tensile modulus at 500% elongation (TM500), tensile strength (TS), and elongation at break (EB), of the NRL composites containing varying FPP contents of 0, 2, 4, or 6 phr are shown in Table 5. The results indicated that TM500 generally increased with increasing MPP and DPP contents (mainly due to the higher rigidity of MPP and DPP than that of NR), subsequently enhancing overall rigidity and the TM500 value of the NRL composites. However, in contrast to the MPP/NRL and DPP/NRL samples, the TM500 value of the PPP/NRL gloves initially increased with the initial addition of 2 phr due to the rigidity of PPP (similar to MPP and DPP) but later decreased at higher PPP contents (95% confidence level). This reduction in TM500 could have been due to the release of gases, such as CO, H2, and CxHy, during the oven-drying that created large air bubbles and visible voids in the samples (Figure 8g) [8], subsequently reducing the overall rigidity and the TM500 value of the PPP/NRL composites.
Table 5 also shows the reinforcing effects of FPP in NRL composites, as evidenced by the increases in TS of the NRL gloves containing 4 phr MPP, 4 phr PPP, and 2 phr DPP (95% confidence level—Table S6). The initial reinforcing effects of FPP found in this work were in good agreement with other studies [17,55]. However, as more FPP was added to the NRL composites, the TS began to decrease. This negative effect from adding too much FPP could have been due to the initiation of particle agglomerations due to the unfavorable filler–filler interactions, as well as the creation of air bubbles and voids that reduced the matrix continuity and the ability to transfer and withstand external forces, thus affecting the strength of the composites [56]. In addition to TM500 and TS, the EB of the NRL composites mostly decreased with increasing FPP contents (except those containing PPP), which could have been due to the obstruction from the added FPP that limited the abilities of NR chains to mobilize along the directions of external forces [57].
The comparisons of mechanical properties, consisting of TM500, TS, EB, and Caging, for non-aged, thermal-aged, and gamma-aged FPP/NRL gloves are shown in Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11 (the results of statistical analysis for thermal-aged and gamma-aged FPP/NRL gloves are shown in Tables S9–S26). The results indicated that the TM500 values of the samples mostly increased after the aging process, probably due to the post-curing effect from heat and gamma irradiation that re-initiated the crosslinking of NR molecular chains, resulting in enhanced rigidity and TM500 values of the composites [58]. Notably, the thermal aging process initiated the post-curing (crosslinking) effects on the NRL gloves by enabling unused chemicals in the NR composites to be re-activated after the initial curing (during sample preparation), further increasing the overall rigidity of the composites [59]. On the other hand, gamma aging created free radicals in the NR matrix through the transfer of energy from the incident gamma radiation to the NR molecular chains, with the recombination of these polymer radicals leading to crosslinking and subsequently increasing the rigidity of the composites [32]. However, the TS and EB values tended to decrease for both aging conditions (except at some lower FPP contents, where the post-curing effect still dominated the aging process). This reduction in TS and EB after the aging could have been due to the initiation of a chain-scission mechanism that mostly occurred at the double bonds of C (C=C) in NR molecular chains (highly unsaturated hydrocarbon), subsequently lowering the strength and overall ability of the composites to withstand and elongate along external forces [60,61]. It should be noted that this chain-scission mechanism was, in fact, a competing factor to the crosslinking from post-curing, with the dominance of either mechanism largely defining the mechanical properties of the aged samples.
Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11 reveal that the pristine NR suffered greater oxidative degradation from heat and radiation than any of the FPP/NRL gloves (95% confidence level), as evidenced by the lower Caging in the former (0.54 for thermal aging and 0.61 for gamma aging) compared to values in the latter (Figure 9d, Figure 10d and Figure 11d). The lower Caging in the pristine NR could have been due to the lack of antioxidants in the material formulation, which allowed free radicals created during the aging to initiate more chain-scission in NR molecular chains, substantially reducing the strength and flexibility of the aged composites. On the other hand, the addition of FPP, which had shown the ability to scavenge and stabilize free radicals (Section 3.1.2), could prevent or slow down oxidative degradation by acting as radical chain terminators that converted radicals into stable products [38,62]. Notably, the MPP/NRL gloves generally had higher Caging values than those of the PPP/NRL and DPP/NRL gloves, with the Caging values for the former being in the range of 0.85–1.01 for thermal aging and 0.87–1.12 for gamma aging. These higher Caging values could have been due to the higher radical-scavenging capabilities of MPP compared to PPP and DPP, as seen by the much lower IC50 value of MPP (Table 2). This higher antioxidant ability of MPP limited chain-scission to dominate the aging process, subsequently preserving the mechanical properties of the aged composites. As a result, the investigations on the effects of thermal and gamma aging in this work clearly confirmed the great potential of utilizing MPP, PPP, and DPP as natural antioxidants in the production of NRL gloves, which could be used as a basis for the development of other rubber-based products.

3.3. Recommended FPP Contents for Actual Production

To determine the recommended FPP contents for the actual production of NRL gloves, the TS and EB values of the samples (both before and after thermal aging) were compared with the requirements of medical examination latex gloves, following the ASTM D3578-05 standard that requires the TS and EB values for non-aged (thermal-aged) latex gloves must be higher than 18 MPa and 650% (14 MPa and 500%), respectively. Based on the results shown in Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11, the samples with higher TS and EB values than the requirements (shown as solid and dotted red lines for non-aged and thermal-aged samples, respectively) were those containing 2–4 phr of MPP, 4 phr of PPP, and 2 phr of DPP. These mentioned FPP contents could be regarded as the recommended contents for actual production, which would not only reinforce NRL gloves but also enhance the ability to resist oxidative degradation from heat and radiation, subsequently improving the useability and shelf-life of the materials. It should be noted that the pristine NR had TS and EB values lower than those required (both before and after thermal aging), implying their unsuitability as durable medical examination latex gloves as well as the necessity of using antioxidants in NR products.

4. Conclusions

This work developed NRL gloves containing FPPs, namely MPP, PPP, and DPP, as dual natural antioxidants and reinforcing bio-fillers, with varying FPP contents of 0, 2, 4, or 6 phr. The investigation on the thermal stability of the prepared FPPs using TGA showed that the decompositions of hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin occurred at 200–220 °C, 315–330 °C, and 400–420 °C, respectively. In addition, MPP had the highest radical-scavenging capacity, as seen by its lowest IC50 value of 0.10 ± 0.01 mg/mL. The results also indicated that the FPPs acted as effective natural antioxidants and reinforcing bio-fillers to the NRL composites, as seen by their higher aging coefficients (under thermal and gamma aging) as well as the initial increases in tensile strength of the samples containing 2–4 phr of FPPs. Furthermore, by benchmarking the developed NRL gloves with the requirements of medical examination latex gloves (with and without thermal aging), according to ASTM D3578-05, the recommended FPP contents for actual use were 2–4 phr for MPP, 4 phr for PPP, and 2 phr for DPP. In conclusion, the overall results suggested that MPP, PPP, and DPP could be utilized as natural antioxidants and reinforcing bio-fillers for the production of NRL gloves that offered not only a simpler process to produce high-quality latex gloves but also sustainable methods to utilize agricultural and food wastes in rubber industries.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox12051119/s1, Table S1: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of radical-scavenging effects (RSEs) of extracts from MPP, PPP, and DPP with varying extract concentrations. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S2: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of L* parameter for NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP, PPP, and DPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S3: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of a* parameter for NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP, PPP, and DPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S4: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of b* parameter for NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP, PPP, and DPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S5: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of densities for NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP, PPP, and DPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S6: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of tensile strength for non-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP, PPP, and DPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S7: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of tensile modulus for non-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP, PPP, and DPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S8: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of elongation at break for non-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP, PPP, and DPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S9: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of tensile strength for thermal-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S10: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of tensile strength for gamma-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S11: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of tensile strength for thermal-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of PPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S12: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of tensile strength for gamma-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of PPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S13: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of tensile strength for thermal-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of DPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S14: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of tensile strength for gamma-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of DPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S15: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of tensile modulus for thermal-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S16: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of tensile modulus for gamma-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S17: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of tensile modulus for thermal-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of PPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S18: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of tensile modulus for gamma-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of PPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S19: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of tensile modulus for thermal-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of DPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S20: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of tensile modulus for gamma-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of DPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S21: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of elongation at break for thermal-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S22: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of elongation at break for gamma-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S23: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of elongation at break for thermal-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of PPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S24: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of elongation at break for gamma-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of PPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S25: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of elongation at break for thermal-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of DPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value. Table S26: Statistical results based on the t-test for the determination of elongation at break for gamma-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of DPP. The values are shown as t(degrees of freedom) = t-value; p < p-value.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.S.; methodology, A.T. and K.S.; validation, A.T., J.D., N.T., S.T., T.I. and K.S.; formal analysis, A.T., J.D. and K.S.; investigation, A.T., J.D., N.T. and K.S.; writing—original draft preparation, K.S.; writing—review and editing, A.T., J.D., N.T., S.T., T.I. and K.S.; visualization, A.T. and K.S.; supervision, S.T., T.I. and K.S.; funding acquisition, A.T. and K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Office of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation; the Thailand Science Research and Innovation through the Kasetsart University Reinventing University Program 2021; the Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI), Bangkok, Thailand, grant number FF(KU)25.64; and the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT), grant number N41A640278. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI), Bangkok, Thailand, and the Specialized Center of Rubber and Polymer Materials in Agriculture and Industry (RPM) provided publication support. The authors also acknowledge technical and equipment support from the Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology (TINT).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Obi, F.O.; Ugwuishiwu, B.O.; Nwakaire, J.N. Agricultural waste concept, generation, utilization and management. Niger. J. Technol. 2016, 35, 957–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bhatnager, A.; Sillanpaa, M.; Witek-Krowiak, A. Agricultural waste peels as versatile biomass for water purification—A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 270, 244–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kasirajan, S.; Ngouajio, M. Polyethylene and biodegradable mulches for agricultural applications: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 32, 501–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aprianti, E.; Shafigh, P.; Bahri, S.; Farahani, J.N. Supplementary cementitious materials origin from agricultural wastes—A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 74, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bahrami, A.; Soltani, N.; Pech-Canul, M.I.; Gutierrez, C.A. Development of metal-matrix composites from industrial/agricultural waste materials and their derivatives. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 46, 143–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Navarro, E.; Costa, N.; Pereira, A. A systematic review of IoT solutions for smart farming. Sensors 2020, 20, 4231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Calabi-Floody, M.; Medina, J.; Rumpel, C.; Condron, L.M.; Hernandez, M.; Dumont, M.; de la Luz Mora, M. Chapter three—Smart fertilizers as a strategy for sustainable agriculture. Adv. Agron. 2018, 147, 119–157. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pathak, P.D.; Mandavgane, S.A.; Kulkarni, B.D. Fruit peel waste: Characterization and its potential uses. Curr. Sci. 2017, 113, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dutta, S.; Bhattacharry, A.; Ganguly, A.; Gupta, S.; Basu, S. Application of response surface methodology for preparation of low-cost adsorbent from citrus fruit peel and for removal of Methylene Blue. Desalination 2011, 275, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumar, H.; Bhardwaj, K.; Sharma, R.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Dhanjal, D.S.; Verma, R.; Bhardwaj, P.; Sharma, S.; Kumar, D. Fruit and vegetable peels: Utilization of high value horticultural waste in novel industrial applications. Molecules 2020, 25, 2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saleem, M.; Saeed, M.T. Potential application of waste fruit peels (orange, yellow lemon and banana) as wide range natural antimicrobial agent. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2020, 32, 805–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Thi, T.U.D.; Nguyen, T.T.; Thi, Y.D.; Thi, K.H.T.; Phan, B.T.; Pham, K.N. Green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using orange fruit peel extract for antibacterial activities. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 23899–23907. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yusefi, M.; Shameli, K.; Ali, R.R.; Pang, S.W.; Teiw, S.Y. Evaluating anticancer activity of plant-mediated synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles using Punica Granatum fruit peel extract. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1204, 127539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, B.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, G.; Li, P.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Xia, Y.; Zhao, Y. An organic nonvolatile resistive switching memory device fabricated with natural pectin from fruit peel. Org. Electron. 2017, 42, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ninyong, K.; Wimolmala, E.; Sombatsompop, N.; Saenboonruang, K. Properties of natural rubber (NR) and wood/NR composites as gamma shielding materials. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 526, 012038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thumwong, A.; Wimolmala, E.; Markpin, T.; Sombatsompop, N.; Saenboonruang, K. Enhanced X-ray shielding properties of NRL gloves with nano-Bi2O3 and their mechanical properties under aging conditions. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2021, 186, 109530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sukatta, U.; Rugthaworn, P.; Seangyen, W.; Tantaterdtam, R.; Smitthipong, W.; Chollakup, R. Prospects for rambutan peel extract as natural antioxidant on the aging properties of vulcanized natural rubber. SPE Polym. 2021, 2, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tasakorn, P.; Amatyakul, W. Photochemical reduction of molecular weight and number of double bonds in natural rubber film. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2008, 25, 1532–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thumwong, A.; Poltabtim, W.; Kerdsang, P.; Saenboonruang, K. Roles of Chitosan as bio-fillers in radiation-vulcanized natural rubber latex and hybrid radiation and peroxide-vulcanized natural rubber latex: Physical/mechanical properties under thermal aging and biodegradability. Polymers 2021, 13, 3940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Suleria, H.A.R.; Barrow, C.J.; Dunshea, F.R. Screening and characterization of phenolic compounds and their antioxidant capacity in different fruit peels. Foods 2020, 9, 1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, H.; Yang, Y.F.; Zhou, Z.Q. Phenolic and flavonoid contents of mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) fruit tissues and their antioxidant capacity as evaluated by DPPH and ABTS methods. J. Integr. Agric. 2018, 17, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sethi, S.; Joshi, A.; Arora, B.; Bhowmik, A.; Sharma, R.R.; Kumar, P. Significance of FRAP, DPPH, and CUPRAC assays for antioxidant activity determination in apple fruit extracts. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2020, 246, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mahir, N.A.; Ismail, H. Study of mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana) peel powder as antioxidant in natural rubber compound. J. Vinyl Addit. Technol. 2017, 23, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pocan, P.; Bahcegul, E.; Oztop, M.H.; Hamamci, H. Enzymatic hydrolysis of fruit peels and other lignocellulosic biomass as a source of sugar. Waste Biomass Valor. 2018, 9, 929–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jacob, M.; Thomas, S.; Varughese, K.T. Mechanical properties of sisal/oil palm hybrid fiber reinforced natural rubber composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2004, 64, 955–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hariwongsanupab, N.; Thanawan, S.; Amornsakchai, T.; Vallet, M.F.; Mougin, K. Improving the mechanical properties of short pineapple leaf fiber reinforced natural rubber by blending with acrylonitrile butadiene rubber. Polym. Test. 2017, 57, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sivasubramanian, P.; Mayandi, K.; Santulli, C.; Alavudeen, A.; Rajini, N. Effect of fiber length on curing and mechanical behavior of pineapple leaf fiber (PALF) reinforced natural rubber composites. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 19, 4326–4337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Thumwong, A.; Chinnawet, M.; Intarasena, P.; Rattanapongs, C.; Tokonami, S.; Ishikawa, T.; Saenboonruang, K. A comparative study on X-ray shielding and mechanical properties of natural rubber latex nanocomposites containing Bi2O3 or BaSO4: Experimental and numerical determination. Polymers 2022, 14, 3654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Poh, G.K.X.; Chew, I.M.L.; Tan, J. Life cycle optimization for synthetic rubber glove manufacturing. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2019, 42, 1771–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Moonlek, B.; Saenboonruang, K. Mechanical and electrical properties of radiation-vulcanized natural rubber latex with waste eggshell powder as bio-fillers. Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 2019, 174, 452–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hernigou, P.; Boceno, A.; Potage, D. Rubber gloves in orthopaedic surgery (part II): Cooke and Goodyear; Halsted and Caroline’s gloves of love; from cotton to rubber after Perthes’ experiments; double glove technique with Urist. Int. Orthop. 2023, 47, 1115–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wicha, G.; Intharaprasit, K.; Wimolmala, E.; Markpin, T.; Saenboonruang, K. Effects of post-gamma irradiation on swelling and mechanical properties of gamma vulcanized natural rubber latex (GVNRL) films. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 773, 012010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Khan, M.; Ware, P.; Shimpi, N. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using peels of Passiflora foetida and study of its activity as an efficient catalyst for the degradation of hazardous organic dye. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Timischl, F. The contrast-to-noise ratio for image quality evaluation in scanning electron microscopy. Scanning 2015, 37, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kires, M. Archimedes’ principle in action. Phys. Educ. 2007, 42, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Toyen, D.; Wimolmala, E.; Sombatsompop, N.; Markpin, T.; Saenboonruang, K. Sm2O3/UHMWPE composites for radiation shielding applications: Mechanical and dielectric properties under gamma irradiation and thermal neutron shielding. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2019, 164, 108366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Can-Cauich, C.; Sauri-Duch, E.; Betancur-Ancona, D.; Chel-Guerrero, L.; Gonzalez-Aguilar, G.A.; Cuevas-Glory, L.F.; Perez-Pacheco, E.; Moo-Huchin, V.M. Tropical fruit peel powders as functional ingredients: Evaluation of their bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 37, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Erukainure, O.L.; Onifade, O.F.; Odjobo, B.O.; Olasehinde, T.A.; Adesioye, T.A.; Tugbobo-Amisu, A.O.; Adenekan, S.O.; Okonrokwo, G.I. Ethanol extract of Tetrapleura tetraptera fruit peels: Chemical characterization, and antioxidant potentials against free radicals and lipid peroxidation in hepatic tissues. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2017, 11, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hsu, C.Y.; Chao, P.Y.; Hu, S.P.; Yang, C.M. The antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of chlorophylls and pheophytins. Food Nutr. Sci. 2013, 4, 35234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, X.; Yang, K.; Zhang, P. Evaluation of the aging coefficient and the aging lifetime of carbon black-filled styrene-isoprene-butadiee rubber after thermal-oxidative aging. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022, 220, 109258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. El Gheriany, I.A.; El Saqa, F.A.; El Razek Amer, A.A.; Hussein, M. Oil spill sorption capacity of raw and thermally modified orange peel waste. Alex. Eng. J. 2020, 59, 925–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Majid, N.F.F.; Katende, A.; Ismail, I.; Sagala, F.; Sharif, N.M.; Yunus, M.A.C. A comprehensive investigation on the performance of durian rind as a lost circulation material in water based drilling mud. Petroleum 2019, 5, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Trilokesh, C.; Uppuluri, K.B. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from jackfruit peel. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mukti, N.I.F.; Prasetyo, I.; Mindaryani, A.; Septarini, S. Preparation of porous carbon as ethylene adsorbent by pyrolysis of extraction waste Mangosteen rinds. MATEX Web Conf. 2018, 154, 01032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Huang, R.; Cao, M.; Guo, H.; Su, R.; He, Z. Enhanced ethanol production from pomelo peel waste by integrated hydrothermal treatment, multienzyme formulation, and fed-batch operation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 4643–4651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lubis, R.; Saragih, S.W.; Wirjosentono, B.; Eddyanto, E. Characterization of durian rinds fiber (Durio zubinthinus, Murr) from North Sumatera. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 2049, 020069. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yu, X.L.; He, Y. Optimal ranges of variables for an effective adsorption of lead (II) by the agricultural waste pomelo (Citrus grandis) peels using Doehlert designs. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wittenauer, J.; Schweiggert-Weisz, U.; Carle, R. In vitro-study of antioxidant extracts from Garcinia mangostana pericarp and Riesling grape pomace—A contribution to by-products valorization as cosmetic ingredients. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2016, 89, 249–257. [Google Scholar]
  49. Xiao, L.; Ye, F.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, G. Utilization of pomelo peels to manufacture value-added products: A review. Food Chem. 2021, 351, 129247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhan, Y.F.; Hou, X.T.; Fan, L.L.; Du, Z.C.; Ch’ng, S.E.; Ng, S.M.; Thepkaysone, K.; Hao, E.W.; Deng, J.G. Chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of durian shells in ASEAN countries: A review. Chin. Herb. Med. 2021, 13, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kusumawati, N.; Santoso, A.B.; Sianita, M.M.; Muslim, S. Extraction, characterization, and application of natural dyes from the fresh mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) peel. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2017, 7, 878–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, C. True density of microcrystalline cellulose. J. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 94, 2132–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Mohamed, A.; Anas, A.K.; Bakar, S.A.; Aziz, A.A.; Sagisaka, M.; Brown, P.; Eastoe, J.; Kamari, A.; Hashim, N.; Isa, I.M. Preparation of multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) stabilised by highly branched hydrocarbon surfactants and dispersed in natural rubber latex nanocomposites. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2014, 292, 3013–3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sukthawon, C.; Dittanet, P.; Saeoui, P.; Loykulnant, S.; Prapainainar, P. Electron beam irradiation crosslinked chitosan/natural rubber-latex film: Preparation and characterization. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2020, 177, 109159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Moopayuk, W.; Tangboriboon, N. Anti-microbial and self-cleaning of natural rubber latex gloves by adding mangosteen peel powder. Key Eng. Mater. 2018, 777, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rakkaew, J.; Sombatsompop, N.; Markpin, T.; Wimolmala, E.; Saenboonruang, K. Effects of bismuth-embedded wood particles on mechanical, physical, and gamma-shielding properties of wood/poly(vinyl chloride) composites. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2020, 80, 1441–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mahmoud, M.E.; Khalifa, M.A.; El-Sharkawy, R.M.; Youssef, M.R. Effects of Al2O3 and BaO nano-additives on mechanical characteristics of high-density polyethylene. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 262, 124251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Shou, J.Q.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Zhao, G.Z.; Liu, Y.Q. Effect of curing temperature on properties of semi-efficient vulcanized natural rubber. J. Elastomers Plast. 2016, 48, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nampitch, T.; Buakaew, P. The effect of curing parameters on the mechanical properties of styrene-NR elastomers containing natural rubber-graft-polystyrene. Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.) 2006, 40 (Suppl. S6), 7–16. [Google Scholar]
  60. Pimolsiriphol, V.; Saeoui, P.; Sirisinha, C. Relationship among thermal ageing degradation, dynamic properties, cure systems, and antioxidants in natural rubber vulcanisates. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2007, 46, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vinod, V.S.; Varghese, S.; Kuriakose, B. Degradation behaviour of natural rubber-aluminium powder composites: Effect of heat, ozone and high energy radiation. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2002, 75, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Seguchi, T.; Tamura, K.; Shimada, A.; Sugimoto, M.; Kudoh, H. Mechanism of antioxidant interaction on polymer oxidation by thermal and radiation ageing. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012, 81, 1747–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Images of (a)/(d) MPP, (b)/(e) PPP, and (c)/(f) DPP. (ac) are micrograph images taken using SEM with 400× magnification, while (df) are optical images showing actual colors of ground MPP, PPP, and DPP.
Figure 1. Images of (a)/(d) MPP, (b)/(e) PPP, and (c)/(f) DPP. (ac) are micrograph images taken using SEM with 400× magnification, while (df) are optical images showing actual colors of ground MPP, PPP, and DPP.
Antioxidants 12 01119 g001
Figure 2. Thermal stabilities of FFPs (MPP, PPP, and DPP) determined using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) with (a) correlations between remaining weights of each FPP and temperature, where circled numbers indicate stages of thermal stabilities for FPPs and (b) correlations between derivative weights of FPPs and temperature.
Figure 2. Thermal stabilities of FFPs (MPP, PPP, and DPP) determined using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) with (a) correlations between remaining weights of each FPP and temperature, where circled numbers indicate stages of thermal stabilities for FPPs and (b) correlations between derivative weights of FPPs and temperature.
Antioxidants 12 01119 g002
Figure 3. Functional groups of the FPPs (MPP, PPP, and DPP), determined using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).
Figure 3. Functional groups of the FPPs (MPP, PPP, and DPP), determined using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).
Antioxidants 12 01119 g003
Figure 4. Radical-scavenging effects (RSEs) of extracts from (a) MPP, (b) PPP, and (c) DPP with varying extract concentrations. The error bars represent standard deviations of the mean.
Figure 4. Radical-scavenging effects (RSEs) of extracts from (a) MPP, (b) PPP, and (c) DPP with varying extract concentrations. The error bars represent standard deviations of the mean.
Antioxidants 12 01119 g004
Figure 5. Optical images of (a) NRL, (b) 2 phr MPP/NRL, (c) 4 phr MPP/NRL, (d) 6 phr MPP/NRL, (e) 2 phr PPP/NRL, (f) 4 phr PPP/NRL, (g) 6 phr PPP/NRL, (h) 2 phr DPP/NRL, (i) 4 phr DPP/NRL, and (j) 6 phr DPP/NRL gloves.
Figure 5. Optical images of (a) NRL, (b) 2 phr MPP/NRL, (c) 4 phr MPP/NRL, (d) 6 phr MPP/NRL, (e) 2 phr PPP/NRL, (f) 4 phr PPP/NRL, (g) 6 phr PPP/NRL, (h) 2 phr DPP/NRL, (i) 4 phr DPP/NRL, and (j) 6 phr DPP/NRL gloves.
Antioxidants 12 01119 g005
Figure 6. Thermal stability of pristine NRL and NRL composites containing 6 phr of FPP, determined using TGA, with (a) correlations between remaining weight of NRL composites and temperature, and (b) correlations between derivative weight of NRL composites and temperature.
Figure 6. Thermal stability of pristine NRL and NRL composites containing 6 phr of FPP, determined using TGA, with (a) correlations between remaining weight of NRL composites and temperature, and (b) correlations between derivative weight of NRL composites and temperature.
Antioxidants 12 01119 g006
Figure 7. Functional groups of the pristine NRL and NRL containing 6 phr of MPP, PPP, and DPP determined using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).
Figure 7. Functional groups of the pristine NRL and NRL containing 6 phr of MPP, PPP, and DPP determined using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).
Antioxidants 12 01119 g007
Figure 8. Micrograph images showing morphological properties of (a) NRL, (b) 2 phr MPP/NRL, (c) 4 phr MPP/NRL, (d) 6 phr MPP/NRL, (e) 2 phr PPP/NRL, (f) 4 phr PPP/NRL, (g) 6 phr PPP/NRL, (h) 2 phr DPP/NRL, (i) 4 phr DPP/NRL, and (j) 6 phr DPP/NRL gloves (10,000× magnification).
Figure 8. Micrograph images showing morphological properties of (a) NRL, (b) 2 phr MPP/NRL, (c) 4 phr MPP/NRL, (d) 6 phr MPP/NRL, (e) 2 phr PPP/NRL, (f) 4 phr PPP/NRL, (g) 6 phr PPP/NRL, (h) 2 phr DPP/NRL, (i) 4 phr DPP/NRL, and (j) 6 phr DPP/NRL gloves (10,000× magnification).
Antioxidants 12 01119 g008
Figure 9. Mechanical properties of (a) tensile modulus at 500% elongation, (b) tensile strength, (c) elongation at break, and (d) aging coefficient of thermal-aged and gamma-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP. The solid and dotted red lines in (b,c) represent minimum requirements for non-aged and thermal-aged medical examination latex gloves, respectively, according to ASTM D3578-05. The error bars represent standard deviations of the mean values.
Figure 9. Mechanical properties of (a) tensile modulus at 500% elongation, (b) tensile strength, (c) elongation at break, and (d) aging coefficient of thermal-aged and gamma-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP. The solid and dotted red lines in (b,c) represent minimum requirements for non-aged and thermal-aged medical examination latex gloves, respectively, according to ASTM D3578-05. The error bars represent standard deviations of the mean values.
Antioxidants 12 01119 g009
Figure 10. Mechanical properties of (a) tensile modulus at 500% elongation, (b) tensile strength, (c) elongation at break, and (d) aging coefficient of non-aged, thermal-aged, and gamma-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of PPP. The solid and dotted red lines in (b,c) represent minimum requirements for non-aged and thermal-aged medical examination latex gloves, respectively, according to ASTM D3578-05. The error bars represent standard deviations of mean values.
Figure 10. Mechanical properties of (a) tensile modulus at 500% elongation, (b) tensile strength, (c) elongation at break, and (d) aging coefficient of non-aged, thermal-aged, and gamma-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of PPP. The solid and dotted red lines in (b,c) represent minimum requirements for non-aged and thermal-aged medical examination latex gloves, respectively, according to ASTM D3578-05. The error bars represent standard deviations of mean values.
Antioxidants 12 01119 g010
Figure 11. Mechanical properties, including (a) tensile modulus at 500% elongation, (b) tensile strength, (c) elongation at break, and (d) aging coefficient of thermal-aged and gamma-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of DPP. The solid and dotted red lines in (b,c) represent the minimum requirements for non-aged and thermal-aged medical examination latex gloves, respectively, according to ASTM D3578-05. The error bars represent the standard deviations of the mean.
Figure 11. Mechanical properties, including (a) tensile modulus at 500% elongation, (b) tensile strength, (c) elongation at break, and (d) aging coefficient of thermal-aged and gamma-aged NRL gloves containing varying contents of DPP. The solid and dotted red lines in (b,c) represent the minimum requirements for non-aged and thermal-aged medical examination latex gloves, respectively, according to ASTM D3578-05. The error bars represent the standard deviations of the mean.
Antioxidants 12 01119 g011
Table 1. Material formulations of FPP/NRL gloves with their chemical names, contents, and roles [28].
Table 1. Material formulations of FPP/NRL gloves with their chemical names, contents, and roles [28].
ChemicalContent (phr)Role
10% w/w fruit peel powder (FPP)0, 2, 4, 6Antioxidant/Reinforcing filler
10% w/w potassium hydroxide (KOH)0.2Stabilizer
10% w/w teric 16A160.02Stabilizer
50% w/w sulfur (S)0.8Crosslinking agent
50% w/w zinc diethyl dithiocarbamate (ZDEC)0.4Accelerator
50% w/w zinc-2-mercaptobenzthiazole (ZMBT)0.4Accelerator
50% w/w zinc oxide (ZnO)1.0Activator
Distilled water (H2O)170.5Solvent
Table 2. Antioxidant activity (±standard deviation) at 50% radical-scavenging effect (IC50) of MPP, PPP, and DPP extracts, determined using Equations (4)–(6), respectively. The results of the statistical analysis of IC50 are shown in Table S1.
Table 2. Antioxidant activity (±standard deviation) at 50% radical-scavenging effect (IC50) of MPP, PPP, and DPP extracts, determined using Equations (4)–(6), respectively. The results of the statistical analysis of IC50 are shown in Table S1.
FPP TypeIC50 (mg/mL)
MPP0.10 ± 0.01
PPP6.08 ± 0.27
DPP29.41 ± 0.78
Table 3. L*, a*, b*, and ΔE parameters of NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP, PPP, and DPP. The numbers following ± represent standard deviations (S.D.) of the mean. The results for the statistical analysis of L*, a*, and b* parameters are shown in Tables S2–S4.
Table 3. L*, a*, b*, and ΔE parameters of NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP, PPP, and DPP. The numbers following ± represent standard deviations (S.D.) of the mean. The results for the statistical analysis of L*, a*, and b* parameters are shown in Tables S2–S4.
SampleFPP Content (phr)L*a*b*ΔE
NRL088.6 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.19.3 ± 0.1
MPP/NRL272.0 ± 0.18.6 ± 0.131.2 ± 0.128.7
466.5 ± 0.112.9 ± 0.140.1 ± 0.140.0
657.6 ± 0.120.4 ± 0.147.5 ± 0.153.1
PPP/NRL283.8 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.114.8 ± 0.17.3
482.7 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.118.6 ± 0.111.0
683.4 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.120.1 ± 0.112.0
DPP/NRL283.7 ± 0.11.3 ± 0.116.1 ± 0.18.4
479.3 ± 0.12.9 ± 0.122.0 ± 0.116.0
679.6 ± 0.13.1 ± 0.124.5 ± 0.117.9
Table 4. Densities (±standard deviation) of NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP, PPP, and DPP. The results of the statistical analysis of densities are shown in Table S5.
Table 4. Densities (±standard deviation) of NRL gloves containing varying contents of MPP, PPP, and DPP. The results of the statistical analysis of densities are shown in Table S5.
SampleFPP Content (phr)Density (g/cm3)
NRL00.90 ± 0.02
MPP/NRL20.97 ± 0.01
40.98 ± 0.01
60.98 ± 0.01
PPP/NRL20.96 ± 0.01
40.97 ± 0.01
60.98 ± 0.01
DPP/NRL20.96 ± 0.01
40.97 ± 0.01
60.99 ± 0.01
Table 5. Mechanical properties—tensile modulus at 500% elongation, tensile strength, and elongation at break of pristine NRL and NRL gloves containing varying contents of FPP. Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation. The results of the statistical analysis of mechanical properties for non-aged samples are shown in Tables S6–S8.
Table 5. Mechanical properties—tensile modulus at 500% elongation, tensile strength, and elongation at break of pristine NRL and NRL gloves containing varying contents of FPP. Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation. The results of the statistical analysis of mechanical properties for non-aged samples are shown in Tables S6–S8.
SampleFPP Content (phr)Tensile Modulus (MPa)Tensile Strength (MPa)Elongation at Break (%)
NRL01.22 ± 0.0616.85 ± 1.471599 ± 15
MPP/NRL21.13 ± 0.0918.10 ± 1.051700 ± 10
41.71 ± 0.1019.25 ± 0.911542 ± 11
61.70 ± 0.1015.94 ± 0.301512 ± 32
PPP/NRL21.43 ± 0.0115.12 ± 0.681478 ± 18
41.36 ± 0.0619.62 ± 0.681689 ± 14
61.15 ± 0.1116.14 ± 0.851647 ± 28
DPP/NRL21.32 ± 0.0420.48 ± 0.611680 ± 15
41.62 ± 0.1318.00 ± 0.401560 ± 32
61.79 ± 0.0812.29 ± 0.671316 ± 16
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Thumwong, A.; Darachai, J.; Thamrongsiripak, N.; Tokonami, S.; Ishikawa, T.; Saenboonruang, K. Fruit Peel Powder as Natural Antioxidant and Reinforcing Bio-Filler in Natural Rubber Latex Gloves: Cases of Mangosteen, Pomelo and Durian. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051119

AMA Style

Thumwong A, Darachai J, Thamrongsiripak N, Tokonami S, Ishikawa T, Saenboonruang K. Fruit Peel Powder as Natural Antioxidant and Reinforcing Bio-Filler in Natural Rubber Latex Gloves: Cases of Mangosteen, Pomelo and Durian. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(5):1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051119

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thumwong, Arkarapol, Jitsuna Darachai, Nuatawan Thamrongsiripak, Shinji Tokonami, Tetsuo Ishikawa, and Kiadtisak Saenboonruang. 2023. "Fruit Peel Powder as Natural Antioxidant and Reinforcing Bio-Filler in Natural Rubber Latex Gloves: Cases of Mangosteen, Pomelo and Durian" Antioxidants 12, no. 5: 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051119

APA Style

Thumwong, A., Darachai, J., Thamrongsiripak, N., Tokonami, S., Ishikawa, T., & Saenboonruang, K. (2023). Fruit Peel Powder as Natural Antioxidant and Reinforcing Bio-Filler in Natural Rubber Latex Gloves: Cases of Mangosteen, Pomelo and Durian. Antioxidants, 12(5), 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051119

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop