Next Article in Journal
Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Cases, COVID-19 Outcomes and Vaccinations, during the Different SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Greece
Next Article in Special Issue
Susceptibility of Diabetic Patients to COVID-19 Infections: Clinico-Hematological and Complications Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Anticipated Affect That Encourages or Discourages Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: A Scoping Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prone Positioning: A Safe and Effective Procedure in Pregnant Women Presenting with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2023, 11(1), 125; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010125
Submission received: 28 December 2022 / Accepted: 31 December 2022 / Published: 4 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intensive Care during COVID-19 Pandemic)

1. Introduction

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has resulted in a sudden sharp rise in hospitalizations for pneumonia with multiorgan disease [1]. COVID-19 manifests with symptoms ranging from fully asymptomatic to severe disease and death, with the most common manifestations being fever, cough, and shortness of breath [2]. Early in infection, the SARS-CoV-2 targets cells, such as bronchial epithelial cells and pneumocytes, through the viral structural spike (S) protein that binds to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor [3,4]. Similar to other respiratory viral diseases, including influenza, profound lymphopenia may occur in individuals when the SARS-CoV-2 infects and kills T lymphocyte cells [5]. Moreover, the viral inflammatory response, consisting of both the innate and the adaptive immune responses, also impairs lymphopoiesis and increases lymphocyte apoptosis [5]. In later stages of infection, when viral replication accelerates, the epithelial–endothelial barrier integrity is compromised [5]. In severe cases, fulminant activation of coagulation and consumption of clotting factors occur [6]. Besides, the SARS-CoV-2 infects pulmonary capillary endothelial cells, accentuating the inflammatory response and triggering an influx of monocytes and neutrophils. In addition to the respiratory cells, ACE2 is expressed in many different tissues at different levels; it has an organ-specific distribution, such as in the brain, in the intestinal and vascular smooth muscle cells, and in peripheral organs, including the kidney and the liver [7,8,9]. In light of this fact, the novel coronavirus, together with viral pneumonia, can cause coagulopathy, systemic and local thrombotic events, and kidney and liver injury [10,11].
According to the latest data from the World Health Organization (WHO), the worldwide number of COVID-19 infections have exceeded 651 million, and the total number of deaths have reached 6.65 million [12]. The COVID-19 pandemic has placed an unprecedented demand on modern healthcare resources, particularly with the sudden increase in the need for intensive care for pneumonia with multiorgan disease [13]. The overall in-hospital mortality rate for COVID-19 infections is about 15% to 20%, but as high as 40% of patients require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) [5]. However, none of the current clinical treatments have alleviated the demand for intensive care. Therefore, priority needs to be given to critical patients and a triage of scarce resources for critical care is needed to preserve the capacity of the ICU for these patients, including mechanical ventilation.
Although many pharmaceutical candidates have been proposed to prevent and treat patients with COVID-19 infections, there is still no effective drug yet. Therefore, in response to the current pandemic, and in addition to non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), such as social distancing, increased hand hygiene, and the wearing of surgical masks, vaccination is expected to be a safe and effective way to help build the immune barrier [10,14,15,16,17,18,19]. To date, there are more than 200 COVID-19 vaccine candidates in various stages of development, and more than 50 vaccine candidates have entered clinical trials, including the use of nucleic acids (DNA or RNA), inactivated or live attenuated viruses, viral vectors, and recombinant proteins or virus particles [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. However, there is a time lag between vaccine development and distribution in clinics.
We sincerely appreciate all contributors who have submitted their excellent papers to our Special Issue. The current Special Issue provides an effective communication platform to gather original research articles for a more comprehensive understanding of critical care for patients with COVID-19, the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, and current trends in COVID-19 vaccine development. Three articles have been collected in this Special Issue, mainly covering the care of special populations infected with SARS-CoV-2; antibiotic use and resistance in patients with COVID-19 infections; and COVID-19 vaccines.

2. Medical Care for Special Populations with COVID-19

The prone position (PP) helps improve oxygenation through a variety of mechanisms, including increasing the homogeneity of ventilation and perfusion of the entire lung; relieving alveolar compression in the dorsal lung regions; and changing chest compliance, which improves the distribution of gases toward the ventral and para-diaphragmatic lungs. It has been shown to be an effective strategy for patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [30]. Importantly, the impact of PP persists after the patient returns to a supine position. Despite its potential benefits for blood oxygenation, pregnant women are often excluded from trials studying the use of PP due to particular concerns about uterine overload, aortic compression, and fetal health monitoring [31]. Faced with the recent burden of COVID-19 infections among pregnant women, Osmundo et al. described the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of PP in a cohort study that included mechanically ventilated pregnant women who underwent PP due to ARDS induced by the SARS-CoV-2 [32]. Ventilation and gasometric parameters were evaluated at baseline (T0), prone (T1), and supine (T2) positions, and obstetric outcomes were evaluated.
Sixteen pregnant women meeting the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 31.5 (22.0–46.0) years and a mean body mass index of 36.0 (23.4–47.9) kg/m2, participated in their study. Obesity and systemic hypertension were the most common comorbidities, accounting for 73.3% and 40.0% of the cases, respectively. Most of the patients were multiparous (87.5%), and the mean gestational age of the first PP was 27.0 (22.0–31.1) weeks. The study results showed that PP was associated with a >20% increase in PaO2 levels and an increase in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in 50% and 100% of cases, respectively. Specifically, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased 76.7% (20.5–292.4%) at T1 and 76.9% (0–182.7%) at T2. The authors also found that PP produced sustained improvements in the mean PaO2/FiO2 ratio (p < 0.001) and PaCO2 level (p = 0.028). An increase greater than 20% in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio indicates a patient is a responder to PP [33]. Maintaining low levels of PaCO2 facilitates gas exchange between the mother and the fetus and is important for avoiding fetal distress during the treatment of a pregnant woman with ARDS. Interestingly, the authors also observed a significant decrease in PaCO2 after PP. Remarkably, there were no cases of emergency cesarean section or suspected fetal distress throughout PP or in the first 24 h after returning to the supine position.
This study verifies that PP seems to be effective in improving the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and PCO2 level in pregnant patients with COVID-19 infections, and may help delay preterm deliveries, even after the uterus is enlarged throughout the second and third trimesters.

3. Antibiotic Use and Resistance in Patients with COVID-19

According to WHO, antibiotic resistance is one of the top ten global public health hazards to humans [34]. Antimicrobial therapy plays a central role in the management of confirmed or suspected bacterial or fungal respiratory infections. A study before the COVID-19 pandemic predicted that antibiotic-resistant bacteria were responsible for 5 million indirect deaths and 1.3 million direct deaths each year [35]. Unfortunately, those most vulnerable to COVID-19 infection are also most vulnerable to drug-resistant bacteria. A serious observation was reported that approximately 50% of the deceased patients with COVID-19 had bacterial and fungal coinfections which were highly resistant to several antimicrobials [36]. To understand antibiotic use and resistance in patients with COVID-19 in ICU, Kabrah et al. conducted a cross-sectional study of COVID-19 positive patients admitted to an ICU [37].
In this study, the authors performed a drug susceptibility test for isolated strains in 42 COVID-19 positive patients admitted to a hospital’s ICU, following standard protocols. Their study showed that a high percentage (42.7%) of the obtained samples contained Klebsiella pneumoniae, and that all the bacteria were multidrug-resistant. Additionally, 76.2% of bacteria were resistant to Ampicillin, 66.7% to Ciprofloxacin, 64.3% to Levofloxacin, 57.1% to Imipenem, and 57.1% to Moxifloxacin. The large rate of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) acquisition in patients with COVID-19 is alarming. The prevalence of MDRB was assessed in 2020 and compared to the years 2017-2019; according to Aurilio C. et al., the prevalence of overall MDRB infection was 45.2% in 2017, 44.2% in 2018, 41.4% in 2019, 19.2% in 2020 in non-COVID-19 wards, and 29.3% in COVID-19 wards [35]. A further effective defense against MDRB cross-transmission should have been the physical separation of patients with COVID-19. In addition to infection control measures, patients with severe specific infectious pneumonia are first considered to be at significant risk for bacterial co-infection and secondary nosocomial infection; even in the absence of bacterial infection, early COVID-19 symptoms may encourage the initiation of antibiotic treatment [38,39]. Thus, in the event of a pandemic, antimicrobial surveillance is critical to detect warning indicators of abuse or overuse.
Overall, Kabrah et al. showed that antibiotic resistance is highly prevalent among ICU patients with COVID-19 and all of the obtained bacteria were MDRB. Therefore, during the COVID-19 pandemic, it should be emphasized that a multi-modal strategy of strict antibiotic use combined with infection, prevention, and control practices can improve antimicrobial management and, thereby, prevent the spread of MDRB [40].

4. Progress on COVID-19 Vaccines

Among the most cost-effective strategies for preventing viral infections, vaccination represents the best tool for helping the immune system to activate protective responses [41]. Vaccination can contribute to preventing or controlling the spread of contagious viral diseases by activating the host immune system to induce long-term immune memory [42]. Several types of vaccines have been developed against the SARS-CoV-2, including inactivated vaccines, live attenuated vaccines, viral vector vaccines, recombinant protein vaccines, and genetic-based vaccines (mRNA and DNA) [41]. Recombinant protein vaccines form the largest proportion of candidate vaccines undergoing clinical trials [43]. The SARS-CoV-2 contains four structural proteins, including spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N) proteins. The S1 subunit of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein possesses a receptor-binding domain (RBD), which binds to ACE2 of the host cell membrane [44]. The virus releases its genomic RNA into the cytoplasm for reverse transcription and gene expression, resulting in the infection of the host cell. Therefore, the RBD of viral S1 protein is the most targeted antigen in the development of a vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 [45,46]. The key antigen structure of ZifiVax (ZF2001, Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Anhui, China) is the R319 to K537 sequence chain in the RBD domain of the SARS-CoV-2 as a key bone, and the two chains are connected by a disulfide bond [47,48]. An efficacy study of ZF2001 has shown that the vaccine can protect mice and rhesus monkeys against SARS-CoV-2 challenge [48]. In order to advance the study of ZF2001 in clinical trials, Yang et al. investigated the general toxicity and immunogenicity of ZF2001 in cynomolgus monkeys and evaluated possible target organs for vaccine toxicity [43].
Yang et al. found that ZF2001 vaccination induced a strong humoral immune response against SARS-CoV-2. They observed high titers and time-dependent neutralizing antibody responses in cynomolgus monkeys. In addition, they observed that increasing the number of vaccinations could increase the antibody level to a certain extent. On the other hand, ZF2001 activated cellular immune responses. High levels of IL-12, IFN-γ, and IL-4 were induced by the stimulation of splenic lymphocyte isolated from cynomolgus monkey with specific COVID-19 antigen, suggesting enhanced Th1 and Th2 immune responses [49]. Therefore, ZF2001 could induce humoral and cellular immune responses in cynomolgus monkeys. These findings suggest that ZF2001 is a promising human vaccine for COVID-19. These results also showed that the ZF2001 vaccine not only did not cause weight/ratio changes in the spleen or thymus organs, but also did not cause histological changes, except for local lymph node hyperplasia and immune response in the muscle at the injection site, which were thought to be caused by the aluminum-containing adjuvant; these symptoms were somewhat relieved after a 2-week recovery period. The antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and vaccine enhancement disease (VED) risks caused by SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been paid more attention to in recent safety evaluations [50,51]. The results of the aforementioned study showed no abnormal changes in immunotoxicity and systemic toxicity after ZF2001 injection in cynomolgus monkeys. As a result, ZF2001 may not increase the risk of ADE and VED in cynomolgus monkeys.
Taken together, Yang et al. demonstrated good tolerance, strong immunogenicity, no general toxicity, and no immunotoxicity of the ZF2001 vaccine, providing support for its entry into large-scale clinical trials.

5. Summary and Conclusions

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to spread, countries around the world are pulling out all the stops to achieve early breakthroughs at all stages of prevention, treatment, and prognosis. Even if SARS-CoV-2 had only infected a small fraction of the planet’s 7.8 billion people, thousands of people became critically ill and required treatment in ICU. The ICU community must prepare for this potentially overwhelming surge of patients to enable rapid diagnosis and isolation, clinical management, and infection prevention. Various problems, such as antibiotic resistance, that arise with the treatment of patients with COVID-19 also need to be addressed in advance. At the same time, current vaccination strategies and preventive measures are the cornerstone of ensuring an optimal protection for all individuals, and research should be strengthened in these areas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Y. and Y.J.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W. and H.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.W., H.Y., and Y.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ramesh, S.; Govindarajulu, M.; Parise, R.S.; Neel, L.; Shankar, T.; Patel, S.; Lowery, P.; Smith, F.; Dhanasekaran, M.; Moore, T. Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Review of Its Mutations, Its Implications and Vaccine Efficacy. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Merad, M.; Blish, C.A.; Sallusto, F.; Iwasaki, A. The immunology and immunopathology of COVID-19. Science 2022, 375, 1122–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shang, J.; Wan, Y.; Luo, C.; Ye, G.; Geng, Q.; Auerbach, A.; Li, F. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 11727–11734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.-H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wiersinga, W.J.; Rhodes, A.; Cheng, A.C.; Peacock, S.J.; Prescott, H.C. Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review. JAMA 2020, 324, 782–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tang, N.; Li, D.; Wang, X.; Sun, Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 844–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Li, Y.; Zhou, W.; Yang, L.; You, R. Physiological and pathological regulation of ACE2, the SARS-CoV-2 receptor. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 157, 104833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kuba, K.; Imai, Y.; Ohto-Nakanishi, T.; Penninger, J. Trilogy of ACE2: A peptidase in the renin-angiotensin system, a SARS receptor, and a partner for amino acid transporters. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010, 128, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, J.; Deng, W.; Li, S.; Yang, X. Advances in research on ACE2 as a receptor for 2019-nCoV. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 78, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Khandker, S.S.; Godman, B.; Jawad, I.; Meghla, B.A.; Tisha, T.A.; Khondoker, M.U.; Haq, A.; Charan, J.; Talukder, A.A.; Azmuda, N.; et al. A Systematic Review on COVID-19 Vaccine Strategies, Their Effectiveness, and Issues. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Robba, C.; Battaglini, D.; Pelosi, P.; Rocco, P.R.M. Multiple organ dysfunction in SARS-CoV-2: MODS-CoV-2. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 2020, 14, 865–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. WHO. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 26 December 2022).
  13. Phua, J.; Weng, L.; Ling, L.; Egi, M.; Lim, C.-M.; Divatia, J.V.; Shrestha, B.R.; Arabi, Y.M.; Ng, J.; Gomersall, C.D.; et al. Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Challenges and recommendations. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 506–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pageaud, S.; Eyraud-Loisel, A.; Bertoglio, J.-P.; Bienvenüe, A.; Leboisne, N.; Pothier, C.; Rigotti, C.; Ponthus, N.; Gauchon, R.; Gueyffier, F.; et al. Predicted Impacts of Booster, Immunity Decline, Vaccination Strategies, and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on COVID-19 Outcomes in France. Vaccines 2022, 10, 2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mendez-Brito, A.; El Bcheraoui, C.; Pozo-Martin, F. Systematic review of empirical studies comparing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19. J. Infect. 2021, 83, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pormohammad, A.; Zarei, M.; Ghorbani, S.; Mohammadi, M.; Neshin, S.A.S.; Khatami, A.; Turner, D.L.; Djalalinia, S.; Mousavi, S.A.; Mardani-Fard, H.A.; et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines against Delta (B.1.617.2) Variant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies. Vaccines 2021, 10, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ibrahim, D.; Kis, Z.; Tak, K.; Papathanasiou, M.M.; Kontoravdi, C.; Chachuat, B.; Shah, N. Model-Based Planning and Delivery of Mass Vaccination Campaigns against Infectious Disease: Application to the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Y.; Ye, Q. Safety and Efficacy of the Common Vaccines against COVID-19. Vaccines 2022, 10, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pratama, N.R.; Wafa, I.A.; Budi, D.S.; Sutanto, H.; Asmarawati, T.P.; Effendi, G.B.; Wungu, C.D.K. Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant (B.1.1.529): A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Vaccines 2022, 10, 2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pormohammad, A.; Zarei, M.; Ghorbani, S.; Mohammadi, M.; Razizadeh, M.; Turner, D.; Turner, R. Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Vaccines 2021, 9, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Álvarez-Díaz, D.A.; Muñoz, A.L.; Herrera-Sepúlveda, M.T.; Tavera-Rodríguez, P.; Laiton-Donato, K.; Franco-Muñoz, C.; Ruiz-Moreno, H.A.; Galindo, M.; Catama, J.D.; Bermudez-Forero, A.; et al. Neutralizing Antibody Responses Elicited by Inactivated Whole Virus and Genetic Vaccines against Dominant SARS-CoV-2 Variants during the Four Epidemic Peaks of COVID-19 in Colombia. Vaccines 2022, 10, 2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tanriover, M.D.; Aydin, O.A.; Guner, R.; Yildiz, O.; Celik, I.; Doganay, H.L.; Kose, S.; Akhan, S.; Akalin, E.H.; Sezer, Z.; et al. Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of the Two-Dose Schedules of TURKOVAC versus CoronaVac in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Observer-Blinded, Non-Inferiority Phase III Trial. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lin, T.-W.; Huang, P.-H.; Liao, B.-H.; Chao, T.-L.; Tsai, Y.-M.; Chang, S.-C.; Chang, S.-Y.; Chen, H.-W. Tag-Free SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Binding Domain (RBD), but Not C-Terminal Tagged SARS-CoV-2 RBD, Induces a Rapid and Potent Neutralizing Antibody Response. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Grassi, T.; Lobreglio, G.; Panico, A.; Rosato, C.; Zizza, A.; Lazzari, R.; Chicone, M.; Indino, F.; Bagordo, F. Kinetics of Humoral Immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in Healthcare Workers after the Third Dose of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thotsiri, S.; Sittiudomsuk, R.; Sutharattanapong, N.; Kantachuvesiri, S.; Wiwattanathum, P. The Effect of a Booster Dose mRNA Vaccine on COVID-19 Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients after Inactivated or Viral Vector Vaccine Immunization. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Resch, M.D.; Wen, K.; Mazboudi, R.; Maasz, H.M.; Persaud, M.; Garvey, K.; Gallardo, L.; Gottlieb, P.; Alimova, A.; Khayat, R.; et al. Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Monovalent and Bivalent Formulations of a Virus-Like Particle Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Boix-Besora, A.; Lorenzo, E.; Lavado-García, J.; Gòdia, F.; Cervera, L. Optimization, Production, Purification and Characterization of HIV-1 GAG-Based Virus-like Particles Functionalized with SARS-CoV-2. Vaccines 2022, 10, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Isakova-Sivak, I.; Stepanova, E.; Matyushenko, V.; Niskanen, S.; Mezhenskaya, D.; Bazhenova, E.; Krutikova, E.; Kotomina, T.; Prokopenko, P.; Neterebskii, B.; et al. Development of a T Cell-Based COVID-19 Vaccine Using a Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine Viral Vector. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Seo, S.; Jang, Y. Cold-Adapted Live Attenuated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Completely Protects Human ACE2 Transgenic Mice from SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Vaccines 2020, 8, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guérin, C.; Reignier, J.; Richard, J.-C.; Beuret, P.; Gacouin, A.; Boulain, T.; Mercier, E.; Badet, M.; Mercat, A.; Baudin, O.; et al. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 2159–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tolcher, M.C.; McKinney, J.R.; Eppes, C.S.; Muigai, D.; Shamshirsaz, A.; Guntupalli, K.K.; Nates, J.L. Prone Positioning for Pregnant Women with Hypoxemia Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 136, 259–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Osmundo, G.D.S.; Paganotti, C.D.F.; da Costa, R.A.; Silva, T.H.D.S.; Bombonati, P.C.; Malbouisson, L.M.S.; Francisco, R.P.V. Prone Positioning: A Safe and Effective Procedure in Pregnant Women Presenting with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Vaccines 2022, 10, 2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Trikha, A.; Ray, B.R. Prone position ventilation in pregnancy: Concerns and evidence. J. Obstet. Anaesth. Crit. Care 2018, 8, 7–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kakkar, A.K.; Shafiq, N.; Singh, G.; Ray, P.; Gautam, V.; Agarwal, R.; Muralidharan, J.; Arora, P. Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Resource Constrained Environments: Understanding and Addressing the Need of the Systems. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aurilio, C.; Sansone, P.; Paladini, A.; Barbarisi, M.; Coppolino, F.; Pota, V.; Pace, M. Multidrug Resistence Prevalence in COVID Area. Life 2021, 11, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Laxminarayan, R.; Duse, A.; Wattal, C.; Zaidi, A.K.M.; Wertheim, H.F.L.; Sumpradit, N.; Vlieghe, E.; Hara, G.L.; Gould, I.M.; Goossens, H.; et al. Antibiotic resistance-the need for global solutions. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 1057–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kabrah, A.; Bahwerth, F.; Alghamdi, S.; Alkhotani, A.; Alahmadi, A.; Alhuzali, M.; Aljerary, I.; Alsulami, A. Antibiotics Usage and Resistance among Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in the Intensive Care Unit in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Vaccines 2022, 10, 2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Nieuwlaat, R.; Mbuagbaw, L.; Mertz, D.; Burrows, L.L.; Bowdish, E.D.M.; Moja, L.; Wright, G.D.; Schünemann, H.J. Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Antimicrobial Resistance: Parallel and Interacting Health Emergencies. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 72, 1657–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rawson, T.M.; Moore, L.S.P.; Zhu, N.; Ranganathan, N.; Skolimowska, K.; Gilchrist, M.; Satta, G.; Cooke, G.; Holmes, A.H. Bacterial and Fungal Coinfection in Individuals with Coronavirus: A Rapid Review to Support COVID-19 Antimicrobial Prescribing. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 2459–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Al-Maani, A.; Al Wahaibi, A.; Al-Zadjali, N.; Al-Sooti, J.; AlHinai, M.; Al Badawi, A.; Al Saidi, A.; AlZadjali, N.; Elshoubary, W.; Al-Harthi, K.; et al. The impact of the hand hygiene role model project on improving healthcare workers’ compliance: A quasi-experimental observational study. J. Infect. Public Health 2022, 15, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Soraci, L.; Lattanzio, F.; Soraci, G.; Gambuzza, M.E.; Pulvirenti, C.; Cozza, A.; Corsonello, A.; Luciani, F.; Rezza, G. COVID-19 Vaccines: Current and Future Perspectives. Vaccines 2022, 10, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dispinseri, S.; Secchi, M.; Pirillo, M.F.; Tolazzi, M.; Borghi, M.; Brigatti, C.; De Angelis, M.L.; Baratella, M.; Bazzigaluppi, E.; Venturi, G.; et al. Neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic COVID-19 is persistent and critical for survival. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, H.; Pan, W.; Chen, G.; Huang, E.; Lu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Z.; Wen, L.; Zhang, S.; et al. Preclinical Toxicity and Immunogenicity of a COVID-19 Vaccine (ZF2001) in Cynomolgus Monkeys. Vaccines 2022, 10, 2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, L.; Niu, S.; Song, C.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, G.; Qiao, C.; Hu, Y.; Yuen, K.Y.; et al. Structural and Functional Basis of SARS-CoV-2 Entry by Using Human ACE2. Cell 2020, 181, 894–904.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Premkumar, L.; Segovia-Chumbez, B.; Jadi, R.; Martinez, D.R.; Raut, R.; Markmann, A.; Cornaby, C.; Bartelt, L.; Weiss, S.; Park, Y.; et al. The receptor binding domain of the viral spike protein is an immunodominant and highly specific target of antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 patients. Sci. Immunol. 2020, 5, eabc8413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Keech, C.; Albert, G.; Cho, I.; Robertson, A.; Reed, P.; Neal, S.; Plested, J.S.; Zhu, M.; Cloney-Clark, S.; Zhou, H.; et al. Phase 1-2 Trial of a SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Spike Protein Nanoparticle Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2320–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xu, X.; Hong, Y.; Chen, E.; Wang, Y.; Ma, B.; Li, J.; Su, W.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, M. Antibodies Induced by Homologous or Heterologous Inactivated (CoronaVac/BBIBP-CorV) and Recombinant Protein Subunit Vaccines (ZF2001) Dramatically Enhanced Inhibitory Abilities against B.1.351, B.1.617.2, and B.1.1.529 Variants. Vaccines 2022, 10, 2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, S.; Li, Y.; Dai, L.; Wang, J.; He, P.; Li, C.; Fang, X.; Wang, C.; Zhao, X.; Huang, E.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant tandem-repeat dimeric RBD-based protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001) against COVID-19 in adults: Two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 and 2 trials. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 1107–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. An, Y.; Li, S.; Jin, X.; Han, J.-B.; Xu, K.; Xu, S.; Han, Y.; Liu, C.; Zheng, T.; Liu, M.; et al. A tandem-repeat dimeric RBD protein-based covid-19 vaccine zf2001 protects mice and nonhuman primates. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2022, 11, 1058–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wen, J.; Cheng, Y.; Ling, R.; Dai, Y.; Huang, B.; Huang, W.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, Y. Antibody-dependent enhancement of coronavirus. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 100, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tunjungputri, R.N.; Tetrasiwi, E.N.; Veronica, M.; Pandelaki, J.; Ibrahim, F.; Nelwan, E.J. Vaccine-Associated Disease Enhancement (VADE): Considerations in Postvaccination COVID-19. Case Rep. Med. 2021, 2021, 9673453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Jin, Y.; Yang, H. Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Vaccines 2023, 11, 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010125

AMA Style

Wang Y, Jin Y, Yang H. Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Vaccines. 2023; 11(1):125. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010125

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Ying, Yuefei Jin, and Haiyan Yang. 2023. "Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic" Vaccines 11, no. 1: 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010125

APA Style

Wang, Y., Jin, Y., & Yang, H. (2023). Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Vaccines, 11(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010125

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop