Next Article in Journal
Mitigation Measures to Control the Expected Mpox Outbreak in a Developing Country—Pakistani Scenario
Next Article in Special Issue
Monkeypox Virus: A Comprehensive Overview of Viral Pathology, Immune Response, and Antiviral Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Truncation of NS1 Protein Enhances T Cell-Mediated Cross-Protection of a Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine Virus Expressing Wild-Type Nucleoprotein
Previous Article in Special Issue
Knowledge and Attitudes of Turkish Physicians towards Human Monkeypox Disease and Related Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Vaccines
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/vaccines11030500
vaccines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Developments in Mpox Prevention and Treatment Options

by
Shiza Malik
1,
Tahir Ahmad
2,
Omar Ahsan
3,
Khalid Muhammad
4 and
Yasir Waheed
5,6,*
1
Bridging Health Foundation, Rawalpindi, Punjab 46000, Pakistan
2
Industrial Biotechnology, Atta ur Rahman School of Applied Biosciences, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
3
Department of Medicine, Foundation University School of Health Sciences, Foundation University Islamabad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
4
Department of Biology, College of Science, UAE University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates
5
Office of Research, Innovation, and Commercialization (ORIC), Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
6
Gilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos 1401, Lebanon
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2023, 11(3), 500; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030500
Submission received: 18 January 2023 / Revised: 15 February 2023 / Accepted: 16 February 2023 / Published: 21 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccination for Monkeypox Infection in Humans)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Human mpox is an emerging epidemic in the world. The monkey pox virus (MPXV) belongs to the same family of zoonotic Orthopoxviridae as that of the smallpox virus and exhibits similar clinical symptomology. Information regarding its diagnostics, disease epidemiology, surveillance, preventive methods, and treatment strategies are being collated with time. The purpose of this review is to trace the recent events in the scientific platform that have defined new preventive and treatment strategies against mpox. A methodological approach has been used to gather data from the latest literature to comprehensively overview the emerging treatment options. The results portion will cover details regarding the prevention of mpox. It will also shed light on a brief description of contemporary vaccines and antiviral agents that have been evaluated for their treatment potential since the emergence of the mpox threat. These treatment options are setting the pace for controlling the widespread monkeypox infection. However, the limitations attached to these treatment strategies need to be tackled quickly to increase their efficacy so that they can be deployed on a large scale for the prevention of this epidemic becoming another pandemic in this decade.

1. Introduction

Despite so many advancements in the field of biotechnology, the world still has to face the burden of epidemics that slowly become pandemics. The world has yet not overcome the COVID-19 pandemic, and other viral epidemics are already here, such as mpox, Dengue, and Ebola among others [1]. The mpox virus is a zoonotic double-stranded DNA virus belonging to the family of Orthopoxviridae. Some other infectious viruses of the past such as poxvirus, variola, cowpox, and vaccinia virus also belong to the same family [2,3]. Most of these other viruses of this family have caused havoc in past decades due to their link with large-scale pandemics [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Therefore, scientists are worried about the evolution of an mpox endemic to the world [3]. So far, these are limited to African countries; however, some recent outbreaks have been reported in other continents as far as America, Asia, and Europe. The situation is thus alarming for scientific and healthcare networks around the world [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35].
The main route of viral spread is through contact with infectious sores and scabs, sharing clothes and bedding, or through the bodily transfer of fluids [35]. The symptomology of mpox infection is similar to smallpox infection with a characteristic rash, fever, and flu-like symptoms [36,37]. According to WHO reports, approximately 68,000 disease incidences of mpox infection have been reported in endemic and outbreak regions. Moreover, 68 deaths have been recorded since the reporting of the first case of monkeypox infection [35,36,37,38]. At the time of writing this review, mpox has spread to 110 different countries of European, Asian, American, Middle Eastern, Australian, and South Asian origin [35,36]. The prevention, diagnosis, and treatment options for mpox are being developed from previous orthopox infection management. As it has a similar nature to smallpox and variola, the potential threat of the pandemic is the prime concern of the scientific community, and therefore vigorous effort is being made to deduce the effective therapeutic options and vaccination drives against monkeypox infection to avoid another biowarfare between humans and virus in the present decade [35,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47].
At present, the mpox is still in limited endemic form with mild and self-limiting disease symptoms [48]. Therefore, in most places, supportive care is being provided to patients, and preventive techniques are being promoted to avoid further virus spread in communities [49]. However, the scientific community is still working continuously to compose antiviral therapies and useful vaccines ahead of time to tackle any future threats possibly arising from mpox [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. As of now, two vaccines have gained FDA approval, namely JYNNEOSTM and ACAM200®, which belong to live replication-incompetent and replication-competent vaccinia viruses, respectively [58,59]. Moreover, some antiviral agents such as tecovirimat, brincidofovir, and cidofovir are also being suggested for tackling mpox in severe diseased cases and immunocompromised patients [58,60]. The purpose of this article is to briefly evaluate the work carried out in the direction of prevention, treatment, and therapeutic compliance with mpox outbreaks and to discuss some of the latest technologies that are being given due consideration for future research orientation in the field of vaccinology and pharmaceuticals. Moreover, light will also be shed upon the need to carry out more research and collaborative work for preventing mpox outbreaks in non-endemic countries.

2. Methodology

A methodological approach has been used to gather the latest data regarding the different dimensions of mpox prevention and treatment strategies, which allowed the inclusion of data from diverse, recent, and the most-cited sources of research studies.

2.1. Data Extraction and Search Strategy

We researched electronic sources such as Google Scholar, Pub Med, NIH (National Library of Medicine), Scopus (Elsevier), and Web of Science. Moreover, the official websites of the WHO, CDC, UNAID, and FDA were also used to obtain the statistical results and latest updates regarding mpox treatment efforts. As the study mainly incorporates the data regarding therapeutics and vaccines against MPXV, the major research terms were “Monkeypox virus”, “mpox”, “mpox epidemic”, “therapeutics against mpox”, “antiviral agents”, “vaccines against mpox”, “vaccination strategies”, “therapies against mpox”, “novel therapeutic approaches”, and some other linked search terms.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

After a thorough analysis of the dates, abstracts, titles, and journals of research publications, they were made part of this review. The process of information gathering was not limited to a few studies but rather collected from research compilations in the form of original research articles, reviews, short commentaries, case reports, and letters to the editors. Finally, the search strategy was limited to incorporating data from 2018 to 2022 to add only the most recent advances related to mpox management, especially during the latest endemic updates of 2022.

3. Results

Extensive data are already present regarding mpox etiology, epidemiology, latest updates on its outbreaks, infection cycle, host viral interaction, and possible viral targets for treatment purposes in recent publications [1,61,62,63,64]. Therefore, in this section we will only discuss the prevention strategies and treatment options, including vaccination and antiviral agents, that have come forward during outbreak months. The focus of the article remains, and readers obtain maximum information to understand therapeutic interventions against monkeypox infection.

3.1. Monkeypox: Course of the Epidemic and Possible Reasons for Recent Decline in Cases

MPXVwas first reported as an infection of zoonotic origin in the DRC back in 1970. It mostly remains endemic to 11 African countries, mainly the DRC, for these past 50 years [3,22,23]. Vulnerable cases, including children, pregnant women, and the elderly with a suppressed immune system, are more prone to develop severe conditions [30,31,32]. Owing to its likely similarity with smallpox infection, the smallpox vaccine can be utilized against monkeypox as directed by the WHO. A few vaccine candidates, including the smallpox vaccine, vaccine candidates, and antiviral agents reported in; tabular format in this study, are currently being employed and tested for the treatment of mpox in endemic regions [33,36].
The endemic nature of mpox has slowly taken the form of an epidemic due to reported cases in different far-off countries, such as the reported outbreaks in Nigeria in 2022 [24]. Similarly, some cases have been reported in the UK, back in April 2022 [17]. According to the WHO, approximately 110 countries have already reported confirmed cases of mpox; these may include the UK, Spain, Portugal, Canada, Germany, Belgium, Italy, France, the Netherlands, Sweden, the UAE, the Czech Republic, Brazil, America, and most reported in the DRC [4,5,8,21,32,37,38,39,40,41]. However, it should be noted that the cases are pertinent to change on an everyday basis, and cases may be differently reported by the WHO and CDC by the time of this publication. Until the date, 31 January 2023, ~ 21163 confirmed cases of mpox have been reported from 29 EU/EEA countries. In the latest reports presented by the WHO, the regions of America (88.2%) and of Africa (5.7%) have reported the highest number of mpox cases. However, there is also an observed decrease in overall mpox cases, by approximately 12.7%, compared to previous months [42,43,44,45].
The possible reason for the declining number of cases might be that the high-risk core groups of individuals have been undergoing vaccination. This scenario has generated a vaccination-elicited immunity in high-risk core groups [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Mpox cases are thus declining naturally. Moreover, the effective public health measure adoption in these endemic regions has also limited the spread of mpox infections [4,7]. An additional factor that should be noted is that mpox has neither a lifelong survival nature nor has purely the characteristic nature of sexually transmitted diseases such as HIV [4,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. The disease mostly remains self-limiting and resolves within 2–4 weeks of symptoms, as the host slowly develops immunity against it. Thus, it is taken as an acute infection. However, it remains still unknown whether the first time mpox elicits durable and protective immunity to protect the host from re-infection or else they required proper medication and vaccination to prevent future infections. Moreover, the nature of sexual transmission is still needed to be confirmed, since the high-risk group seems to have adopted some behavioral modifications such as limiting sexual encounters, which is suggested as the major reason behind the reduced spread of mpox [60]. Owing to these factors, there has been a natural decrease in mpox cases worldwide, though the situation keeps on changing every day [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45].

3.2. Preventive Measures against Monkeypox

Whenever an infectious outbreak hits the world, the first step is to determine a prevention protocol against it. Such is the case for the mpox resurging outbreak. For now, the approved vaccine is a smallpox vaccine that has been checked against mpox and has FDA approval status against smallpox but is still limited to a specific group of personnel. Thus, further clinical trials are needed for confirmed approval against mpox [62,65]. Other preventive measures proposed by healthcare authorities such as the WHO and CDC are outlined in the following section [34,36,47,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76].
  • Avoidance of direct zoonotic contact with animals that may carry mpox, such as monkeys and squirrels, etc.
  • Avoid contact with objects that may be in touch with the infected animals outside of the infected places.
  • Avoid contact with sick individuals with suspected and confirmed mpox since the infection easily spreads through body lesions.
  • Proper sanitization and hand washing after contact with infected objects, places, and animals and use of personal protective equipment when encountering infected individuals.
  • Thorough washing and proper cooking of animal meat products.
  • Adopting careful measures during physical interaction.
  • Isolation of infected individuals to avoid infection spreading to other persons.
  • Wearing medical masks and gloves in cases of confirmed mpox.
  • Proper disinfection and cleaning of infected places and hospital floors.
  • Increase public awareness regarding risks of infection, preventive measures, and possible treatment options.
  • People with an increased risk of developing infection such as medical staff, laboratory workers, scientists, response teams, healthcare workers, and captive animals must be subjected to pre-exposure vaccination to avoid infection spread.
  • Captive animals with the infection must be separated from other animals with proper quarantine care.

3.3. Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis

In addition to the above-mentioned points, healthcare authorities including the Advisory Committee and Immunization Practices (ACIP) have recommended the pre- and post-prophylaxis vaccination for a specific group of people [74]. For pre-exposure prophylaxis, vaccination with the FDA-approved vaccines (ACAM2000® and JYNNEOSTM) is recommended for people working for healthcare authorities with occupations where direct exposure to orthopoxviruses is predicted [72,77]. These may include laboratory technicians and workers, clinical personnel involved in viral disease management, response teams against outbreaks, and vaccination and diagnostic teams, as well as scientists researching on clinical samples of mpox. Thus, proper vaccination protocols should be proposed for ensuring the safety for these personnel.

3.4. Post-Exposure Prophylaxis

PEP is recommended upon unprotected contact with the skin mucous membrane of an infected person or with their bodily fluids, saliva, lesions, oral cavity, clothing, bedding, etc. [72]. It may also be needed for people undergoing close space-sharing for long lengths (around 3 h or more) with the infected person, which may expose them to viruses through aerosol secretions and viral presence in air particles [78]. Additionally, post-exposure vaccination is only recommended by the FDA and CDC for high-degree exposures where there is a possible risk of contracting the virus but not a predictive confirmation as in the case of directly exposed persons [77,78]. Additionally, the lack of protective gloves and medical masks or contact-used material without pre- and post-exposure sanitization is a condition that sensitizes and necessitates vaccination. In cases of uncertain exposure or lower exposure rates, the recommended measures are to undergo diagnosis or monitoring before PEP [72,78,79]. Transmission takes place with prolonged interaction with an infected animal or symptomatic individuals. Thus, with informed guidance from the CDC, post-exposure vaccination should be conducted after approximately 4 days and within a period of 4–14 days to avert disease development [77,79]. If conducted later than the two week period, the disease onset cannot be prevented; however, the disease can only be reduced [79,80].

3.5. Therapeutics and Vaccines

Enormous therapeutics have been proposed, with some having promising results against orthopoxvirus family members. These compounds have proven antiviral effects on smallpox treatment, but there are no confirmed results for mpox in human beings [74]. However, as the first line of treatment, these antiviral agents, vaccines, and drugs are being utilized to avert the spread of mpox until a properly approved vaccine arrives in the healthcare market [80].

3.6. Vaccination Efforts against MPox

As described earlier, it is too soon to expect a vaccine against mpox since the outbreaks have been quite recently reported in different countries; before the current outbreak, the mpox was limited to only a few endemic regions of Africa [28]. However, now that the virus is surging in different countries, scientists have increased the pace of research to deliver an effective vaccine specific against mpox along with efficacious antiviral drugs [2]. At present, smallpox vaccines which exhibit up to 85% protection are being used for mpox, which is a good line to start [62,81]. The epidemiological data indicate that most of the mpox-infected cases were those who did not receive smallpox vaccination in childhood or had never been infected with poxviruses or those who were born after the smallpox pandemic and eradication period [82]. Currently, only two smallpox vaccines have been approved for mpox: a brief report of both vaccines is discussed ahead.
Upon CDC recommendation, these approved vaccines are used in the form of pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis for some specific groups of people as discussed before. Apart from the approved vaccines, some other vaccination trials are also going on. One such experiment was on the Dryvax vaccine and the vaccinia virus vaccine (MVA), which were checked individually and in combination to determine the immune system response. The response came in terms of the initiation of cellular and humoral immune responses [60,83]. Moreover, some experiments on animal models compared the effect of vaccination on disease symptomology. Vaccinated animals were healthier and exhibited fewer or no symptoms while the non-vaccinated animals exhibited various illness symptoms associated with MPXV infection [60,84].
Similarly, some animal models were checked for protein-based vaccination, and they experienced mild to severe symptoms of disease yet still survived, unlike those animals that received DNA fragments and could survive [85]. Similarly, some studies concomitantly used both DNA and protein-based vaccines and received good results in the form of lower symptom rates and disease resolution within a few days. Immune system incitation in the form of antibody production against B-cell-conserved epitopes of mpox was also observed in these animals [86,87,88]. Moreover, experiments have also been conducted to check the impact of passive immunization by the transfer of vaccinia-neutralizing antibodies which demonstrated effective immune system responses in receiving animals [34]. All these studies need to be further checked, and confirmation on human models is the next step to officially obtain a licensed vaccine against mpox. At present, only the approved vaccination is being used for pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis in high-risk individuals. The risk attached to the immune escape, viral mutation, and other strains of orthopox viruses make it imperative to work continuously on alternative vaccines specified against mpox [65,77].

3.7. A Brief Account of Approved Vaccines

Two approved vaccines, JYNNEOSTM and ACAM2000®, are currently being utilized for pre- and post-prophylaxis in specific patients. These vaccines are not readily available and are limited to some endemic regions and most developed countries for precautionary use against mpox-reported cases. Apart from these two vaccines, another vaccine, Aventis Pasteur Smallpox Vaccine (APSV) (a replication-competent vaccinia vaccine), is authorized for emergency purposes in case the other two vaccines are not available or contradicted for application. Some characteristic features of both approved vaccines are shown in Table 1, and a brief account of other vaccine trials is summarized in Table 2 below.

3.8. Antiviral Therapeutics against MPox

The smallpox viruses caused havoc back in its pandemic times and is still considered a bioweapon for its associated lethality and infectivity. Owing to the similar nature of monkeypox viruses, scientists are putting a lot of effort to propose rigorous drugs against mpox. The suggested drugs are undergoing approval stages, and some are being used for the supportive care of patients [65]. Problems associated with vaccination restriction compel the healthcare authorities to heavily rely on these supportive drugs and antiviral agents in case of treatment urgency. Moreover, the disease cases which already developed symptomology of mpox vaccine remain ineffective for reducing the symptoms, and thus drugs come into play. The three most common drugs that are being utilized against mpox are named Cidofovir, Brincidofovir, and Tecovirimat. A brief account of these drugs is discussed below.

3.9. Cidofovir (Vistide®) against MPox

This is a broad-spectrum antiviral agent which acts to terminate DNA polymerase-based replication in the form of 5′-diphosphorylated metabolite and thus is effective against a wide range of DNA viruses. It has proven to be efficacious against viral infections such as HIV, vaccinia, mpox, smallpox, etc. [98]. The main routes of administration include topical and intravenous administration. The best feature of this antiviral agent is that it decreases the symptomology to avert lesions formation and reduces mortality rates. It is used as a second-line therapy for severe vaccinia [82,99]. Specifically, in the case of mpox, the trials have demonstrated reversed mpox by inhibiting mpox replication (proven in vitro and in vivo experiments) [65]. However, it has been reported to cause nephrotoxicity during intravenous administration and thus requires probenecid and hydration and proper dose adjustment with renal functional considerations to deal with nephrotoxicity. Moreover, more clinical experimentation is required on mpox cases in humans [48].

3.10. Brincidofovir (Formerly CMX001) against MPox

Brincidofovir functions by phosphorylation to its active metabolic form “cidofovir diphosphate”. It selectively inhibits activity against orthopox DNA polymerase and thus has proven effective against DNA viruses. It is also known as a lipid conjugate of cidofovir and is considered to be a cidofovir diphosphate prodrug. Lipid acylic nucleoside phosphonate works as a phospholipid in the body and lessens lesion formation with no proven impact with coupled vaccination [81,82,83]. In some cases, reports demonstrated complete recovery of patients with minimal side effects. Thus, it received approval against cytomegalovirus retinitis in HIV patients and received approval for smallpox and related infections in 2021. It is preferred for rapid and widespread administration in cases of emergency outbreaks. Unlike cidofovir, it has good oral bioavailability and no reported nephrotoxicity; therefore, it is approved for oral administration [82,83,99]. However, the liver enzymatic profile must be carefully regulated, and functional tests must be conducted for the application. Additionally, due to hyperactive drug accumulation, it not recommended for immunocompromised patients, pregnant women, and newborns [43]. Recently animal experimentation against mpox reported effective treatment, but it requires more clinical experiments for proper approval and licensure [79,84].

3.11. Tecovirimat (TPOXX)-(ST-246) against MPox

This was licensed in 2018 for smallpox and in 2022 for mpox [64]. It functions to inhibit viral egress by targeting a unique gene that produces the m37 (F13L) envelope protein required for viral maturation and release [85]. It has reported high efficacy against orthopoxvirsues by reducing viral replication pace and viral load. Moreover, it causes delayed viral infection onset and decreases lesion formation and thus causes reduced infection symptomology and mortality rates [86]. Repeated experiments have well established its safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profiles. It showed concomitant immunological effects in coupled vaccination experiments. However, the issue of drug resistance development is there, and no teratogenicity has been predicted in pregnant women [87]. Specifically for mpox, it has been checked in humans but lacks randomized phase 3 trials and thus needs further experimentation [88].

3.12. Vaccinia Immune Globulin (VIG) against MPox

This was licensed in 2018 against vaccinia virus infections. It acts as an alternative to antiviral agents. Its derivatives, recombinant immunoglobulins (rVIG), are under investigation [34,49]. rVIGs work on a strategic passive immunotherapy approach. The candidate’s plasma-derived vaccinia immunoglobulins (VIG), VIGIV Cangene and VIGIV Dynport, are under investigation and are not licensed yet [65,88]. It has been used successfully in refractive cases. As a hyperimmune globulin, it functions to neutralize virus particles and reduces viremia and mortality rates by up to 30–40% [57,77,89]. Antibodies are collected from the plasma of smallpox-immune individuals to create passive immunity. It has been redistricted for application in immunodeficient individuals as it contains amounts of maltose that possibly affect glycemic conditions and insulin levels, may interfere with serological testing, needs caution for renal insufficient profiles, and increases revaccination needs [43,79,84]. There are a lack of human testing data against mpox and thus needs further investigation. Apart from these three antiviral agents, some other important drug candidates under trial against mpox are summarized in Table 3. Note that a detailed explanation of these trials can be traced in the referenced publications since a detailed analysis of these studies is beyond scope of this review article.

3.13. Future Directions for Antiviral Therapies against Mpox

As progress in the field of biotechnology increases, more effort is being put forward to propose novel therapeutic approaches against emerging infectious diseases. Knowing the scope of current targeted therapy approaches such as those based on microRNAs and silencing RNAs, there is work happening to find accurate targeted molecules against mpox [3,74]. Similarly, biomarker-based therapies are also in research annals as biomarkers offer an effective targeting and flexible drug design approach against different kind of diseases [89]. For viral diseases, the biobased approaches allow effective screening, diagnosis, prognosis, and mitigative vaccination and adaptive treatment measures [80,98]. Moreover, by integrating the in silico and bioinformatic statistical and molecular models with biomarker-based theory, more sophisticated therapies could be formulated with fewer side effects, better delivery, reduced resistance potential, and improved pharmacokinetic properties [2,48]. The next step in the development of better antivirals against infectious diseases such as mpox includes the discovery of better cellular targets, innovative drug-targeting strategies, and improved drug delivery mechanisms [95,96,97,98]. Important drug targets and biobased markers tested in different studies are part of Table 3. Most of these biomarkers have been proposed while keeping in consideration the genomic similarities between smallpox and mpox, which sets a trace route for future therapies [38,48,65,80,82,95,96,99].
Another important development that is predictive to develop better treatment options for mpox in the future includes nanotechnology-based therapies [90,97,98]. Specifically, silver nanoparticles have been investigated for their proven antimicrobial properties. AGNPs are being utilized to decrease the infectivity of mpox in different studies [96]. Nanotechnology-based therapies offer novel, inexpensive, and broad-spectrum treatment options against different diseases. The basic principle is to alter the properties of present and newer antivirals at the nanoscale to improve their physiochemical features and linked pharmaceutical properties [74,96]. Another approach is the conjugation of nanoparticles with the approved drugs to improve the effectiveness, targeted delivery, and improved drug delivery to the body. Specific studies of AGNPs against mpox have exhibited their dose-dependent inhibitory effect. However, more studies are needed to prove the research implication in clinical models [3,48,65,95,99].

4. Conclusions

Complex and exaggerating burdens have been imposed on the healthcare system owing to the COVID-19 pandemic and converging outbreaks of various other viral infections at the same time including Ebola, Dengue, and mpox (the focus of the present study). Under these pressurized conditions, the scientific community is rigorously working to produce an effective therapy against mpox and other infectious diseases. Though there is effective work being conducted in the field of vaccination and drug design, the current developments are still considered theoretical because most of the drugs are for diseases of smallpox origin. Therefore, more effort should be kept on modern therapeutic options to specify them against mpox. There is a need to coordinate their efforts with an integrated approach with the medical industry for clinical experimentation. The recommendations from healthcare authorities have been properly outlined, and treatment recommendations and vaccination protocols have also been formulated against specific groups of the workforce and susceptible persons. Thus, a coordinated and participatory approach will be needed to educate the community and general public in awareness programs regarding mitigation, adaptation, and disease management before the epidemic of mpox becomes another pandemic of the century.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M. and Y.W.; methodology, S.M., T.A., O.A., K.M. and Y.W.; validation, S.M., O.A., K.M.; formal analysis, S.M., T.A., O.A., K.M. and Y.W.; resources Y.W.; data curation, S.M., T.A., O.A., K.M. and Y.W.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M. writing—review and editing, S.M., K.M. and Y.W.; supervision, Y.W.; project administration, Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ajmera, K.M.; Goyal, L.; Pandit, T.; Pandit, R. Monkeypox–An emerging pandemic. IDCases 2022, 29, e01587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Focosi, D.; Novazzi, F.; Baj, A.; Maggi, F. Monkeypox: An international epidemic. Rev. Med. Virol. 2022, 32, e2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Huang, Y.; Mu, L.; Wang, W. Monkeypox: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment and prevention. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zambrano, P.G.; Acosta-España, J.; Moyano, F.; Jara, J.B.A. Sexually or intimately transmitted infections: A look at the current outbreak of monkeypox in 2022. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 49, 102383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Quarleri, J.; Delpino, M.; Galvan, V. Monkeypox: Considerations for the understanding and containment of the current outbreak in non-endemic countries. Geroscience 2022, 44, 2095–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shaheen, N.; Diab, R.; Meshref, M.; Shaheen, A.; Ramadan, A.; Shoib, S. Is there a need to be worried about the new monkeypox virus outbreak? A brief review on the monkeypox outbreak. Ann. Med. Surg. 2022, 81, 104396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lansiaux, E.; Jain, N.; Laivacuma, S.; Reinis, A. The virology of human monkeypox virus (hMPOX): A brief overview. Virus Res. 2022, 322, 198932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Girometti, N.; Byrne, R.; Bracchi, M.; Heskin, J.; McOwan, A.; Tittle, V.; Gedela, K.; Scott, C.; Patel, S.; Gohil, J.; et al. Demographic and clinical characteristics of confirmed human monkeypox virus cases in individuals attending a sexual health centre in London, UK: An observational analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 1321–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Català, A.; Clavo-Escribano, P.; Riera-Monroig, J.; Martín-Ezquerra, G.; Fernandez-Gonzalez, P.; Revelles-Peñas, L.; Simon-Gozalbo, A.; Rodríguez-Cuadrado, F.J.; Castells, V.G.; de la Torre Gomar, F.J.; et al. Monkeypox outbreak in Spain: Clinical and epidemiological findings in a prospective cross-sectional study of 185 cases. Br. J. Dermatol. 2022, 187, 765–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. De Baetselier, I.; Van Dijck, C.; Kenyon, C.; Coppens, J.; Michiels, J.; de Block, T.; Smet, H.; Coppens, S.; Vanroye, F.; Bugert, J.J.; et al. Retrospective detection of asymptomatic monkeypox virus infections among male sexual health clinic attendees in Belgium. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 2288–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bukhari, M.H. The truth of monkeypox outbreak: A guide for the diagnostic laboratories, health care workers and community in Pakistan. Biomedica 2022, 38, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Albin, J.S.; Lazarus, J.E.; Hysell, K.M.; Rubins, D.M.; Germaine, L.; Dugdale, C.M.; Heller, H.M.; Hohmann, E.L.; Baugh, J.J.; Shenoy, E.S. Development and implementation of a clinical decision support system tool for the evaluation of suspected monkeypox infection. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2022, 29, 2124–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Minhaj, F.S.; Ogale, Y.P.; Whitehill, F.; Schultz, J.; Foote, M.; Davidson, W.; Hughes, C.M.; Wilkins, K.; Bachmann, L.; Chatelain, R.; et al. Monkeypox outbreak—Nine states, May 2022. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lahariya, C.; Thakur, A.; Dudeja, N. Monkeypox disease outbreak (2022): Epidemiology, challenges, and the way forward. Indian Pediatr. 2022, 59, 636–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schrarstzhaupt, I.N.; Fontes-Dutra, M.; Diaz-Quijano, F.A. Early estimates of the incidence trend and the reproductive number of the monkeypox epidemic in Brazil. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 50, 102484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yadav, P.D.; Reghukumar, A.; Sahay, R.R.; Sudeep, K.; Shete, A.M.; Raman, A.; Vk, P.; Abraham, P.; Benson, R.; Sm, S.; et al. First two cases of Monkeypox virus infection in travellers returned from UAE to India, July 2022. J. Infect. 2022, 85, e145–e148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Miura, F.; van Ewijk, C.E.; Backer, J.A.; Xiridou, M.; Franz, E.; de Coul, E.O.; Brandwagt, D.; van Cleef, B.; van Rijckevorsel, G.; Swaan, C.; et al. Estimated incubation period for monkeypox cases confirmed in The Netherlands, May 2022. Eurosurveillance 2022, 27, 2200448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pettke, A.; Filén, F.; Widgren, K.; Jacks, A.; Glans, H.; Andreasson, S.; Muradrasoli, S.; Helgesson, S.; Hauzenberger, E.; Karlberg, M.L.; et al. Ten-week follow-up of monkeypox case-patient, Sweden 2022. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2022, 28, 2074–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Palich, R.; Burrel, S.; Monsel, G.; Nouchi, A.; Bleibtreu, A.; Seang, S.; Bérot, V.; Brin, C.; Gavaud, A.; Wakim, Y.; et al. Viral loads in clinical samples of men with monkeypox virus infection: A French case series. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 23, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Mileto, D.; Riva, A.; Cutrera, M.; Moschese, D.; Mancon, A.; Meroni, L.; Giacomelli, A.; Bestetti, G.; Rizzardini, G.; Gismondo, M.R.; et al. New challenges in human monkeypox outside Africa: A review and case report from Italy. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 49, 102386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Selb, R.; Werber, D.; Falkenhorst, G.; Steffen, G.; Lachmann, R.; Ruscher, C.; McFarland, S.; Bartel, A.; Hemmers, L.; Koppe, U.; et al. A shift from travel-associated cases to autochthonous transmission with Berlin as epicentre of the monkeypox outbreak in Germany, May to June 2022. Eurosurveillance 2022, 27, 2200499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sukhdeo, S.S.; Aldhaheri, K.; Lam, W.; Walmsley, S. A case of human monkeypox in Canada. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2022, 194, E1031–E1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bragazzi, N.L.; Kong, J.D.; Mahroum, N.; Tsigalou, C.; Khamisy-Farah, R.; Converti, M.; Wu, J. Epidemiological trends and clinical features of the ongoing monkeypox epidemic: A preliminary pooled data analysis and literature review. J. Med. Virol. 2022, 95, e27931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ilic, I.; Macuzic, I.Z.; Ilic, M. Global outbreak of human Monkeypox in 2022: Update of epidemiology. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Waheed, Y.; Sah, R.; Muhammad, K. Recent developments in vaccine for viral diseases. Vaccines 2023, 11, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ophinni, Y.; Frediansyah, A.; Sirinam, S.; Megawati, D.; Stoian, A.M.; Enitan, S.S.; Akele, R.Y.; Sah, R.; Pongpirul, K.; Abdeen, Z.; et al. Monkeypox: Immune response, vaccination and preventive efforts. Narra J 2022, 2, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bosworth, A.; Wakerley, D.; Houlihan, C.; Atabani, S.F. Monkeypox: An old foe, with new challenges. Infect. Prev. Pract. 2022, 4, 100229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Taylor, L. Monkeypox: WHO to rename disease to prevent stigma. Br. Med. J. Publ. Group 2022, 377, o1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rajsri, K.S.; Rao, M. A Review of Monkeypox: The New Global Health Emergency. Venereology 2022, 1, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Obeid, M.A.; Amawi, H.; Alshehri, A.; Adesokan, A. Monkeypox: Emerging virus of concern; antivirals and vaccines therapeutic options. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 173, 105799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pastula, D.M.; Tyler, K.L. An overview of monkeypox virus and its neuroinvasive potential. Ann. Neurol. 2022, 92, 527–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Patauner, F.; Gallo, R.; Durante-Mangoni, E. Monkeypox infection: An update for the practicing physician: Monkeypox infection. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2022, 104, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kipkorir, V.; Dhali, A.; Srichawla, B.; Kutikuppala, S.; Cox, M.; Ochieng, D.; Nyaanga, F.; Găman, M.A. The re-emerging monkeypox disease. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2022, 27, 961–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kumar, N.; Acharya, A.; Gendelman, H.; Byrareddy, S.N. The 2022 outbreak and the pathobiology of the monkeypox virus. J. Autoimmun. 2022, 131, 102855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cuérel, A.; Favre, G.; Vouga, M.; Pomar, L. Monkeypox and Pregnancy: Latest Updates. Viruses 2022, 14, 2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Laurence, J. The recent rise in sexually transmitted infections in the United States was a harbinger of the new monkeypox pandemic. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2022, 36, 333–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Beer, E.M.; Rao, V.B. A systematic review of the epidemiology of human monkeypox outbreaks and implications for outbreak strategy. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Webb, E.; Rigby, I.; Michelen, M.; Dagens, A.; Cheng, V.; Rojek, A.M.; Dahmash, D.; Khader, S.; Gedela, K.; Norton, A.; et al. Availability, scope and quality of monkeypox clinical management guidelines globally: A systematic review. BMJ Glob. Health 2022, 7, e009838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shuvo, P.A.; Roy, A.; Dhawan, M.; Chopra, H.; Emran, T. Recent outbreak of monkeypox: Overview of signs, symptoms, preventive measures, and guideline for supportive management. Int. J. Surg. 2022, 105, 106877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Siegrist, E.A.; Sassine, J. Antivirals with activity against monkeypox: A clinically oriented review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 76, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. World Health Organization. Vaccines and Immunization for Monkeypox: Interim Guidance, 24 August 2022; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
  42. Moyo, E.; Musuka, G.; Murewanhema, G.; Moyo, P.; Dzinamarira, T. Monkeypox outbreak: A perspective on Africa’s diagnostic and containment capacity. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2022, 123, 127–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Altindis, M.; Puca, E.; Shapo, L. Diagnosis of monkeypox virus–An overview. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 50, 102459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jezek, Z.; Szczeniowski, M.; Paluku, K.; Mutombo, M.; Grab, B. Human monkeypox: Confusion with chickenpox. Acta Trop. 1988, 45, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Upadhayay, S.; Arthur, R.; Soni, D.; Yadav, P.; Navik, U.; Singh, R.; Gurjeet Singh, T.; Kumar, P. Monkeypox infection: The past, present, and future. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2022, 113, 109382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Poland, G.A.; Kennedy, R.; Tosh, P.K. Prevention of monkeypox with vaccines: A rapid review. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, e349–e358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chakraborty, S.; Mohapatra, R.K.; Chandran, D.; Alagawany, M.; Sv, P.; Islam, M.A.; Chakraborty, C.; Dhama, K. Monkeypox vaccines and vaccination strategies: Current knowledge and advances. An update-Correspondence. Int. J. Surg. 2022, 105, 106869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Thakur, N. MonkeyPox2022Tweets: A Large-Scale Twitter Dataset on the 2022 Monkeypox Outbreak, Findings from Analysis of Tweets, and Open Research Questions. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2022, 14, 855–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kozlov, M. Can a Smallpox Drug Treat Monkeypox? What Scientists Know; Nature Portfolio Heidelberger Platz 3: Berlin, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pastula, D.M.; Copeland, M.J.; Hannan, M.C.; Rapaka, S.; Kitani, T.; Kleiner, E.; Showler, A.; Yuen, C.; Ferriman, E.M.; House, J.; et al. Two cases of monkeypox-associated encephalomyelitis—Colorado and the District of Columbia, July–August 2022. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 1212–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sherwat, A.; Brooks, J.; Birnkrant, D.; Kim, P. Tecovirimat and the treatment of monkeypox—Past, present, and future considerations. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 387, 579–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chakraborty, S.; Chandran, D.; Mohapatra, R.K.; Alagawany, M.; El-Shall, N.A.; Sharma, A.K.; Chakraborty, C.; Dhama, K. Clinical management, antiviral drugs and immunotherapeutics for treating monkeypox. An update on current knowledge and futuristic prospects. Int. J. Surg. 2022, 105, 106847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mukherjee, D.; Roy, S.; Singh, V.; Gopinath, S.; Pokhrel, N.; Jaiswal, V. Monkeypox as an emerging global health threat during the COVID-19 time. Ann. Med. Surg. 2022, 79, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mailhe, M.; Beaumont, A.-L.; Thy, M.; Le Pluart, D.; Perrineau, S.; Houhou-Fidouh, N.; Deconinck, L.; Bertin, C.; Ferré, V.M.; Cortier, M.; et al. Clinical characteristics of ambulatory and hospitalized patients with monkeypox virus infection: An observational cohort study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022, 29, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kherabi, Y.; Nguyen, L.; Batteux, F.; Launay, O. Re: ‘clinical characteristics of ambulatory and hospitalised patients with monkeypox virus infection’ by Mailhe et al. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022, 29, 269–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Guarner, J.; del Rio, C.; Malani, P.N. Monkeypox in 2022—What clinicians need to know. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2022, 328, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Moore, M.J.; Rathish, B.; Zahra, F. Monkeypox. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Tampa, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  58. Lulli, L.G.; Baldassarre, A.; Mucci, N.; Arcangeli, G. Prevention, Risk Exposure, and Knowledge of Monkeypox in Occupational Settings: A Scoping Review. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hemati, S.; Farhadkhani, M.; Sanami, S.; Mohammadi-Moghadam, F. A review on insights and lessons from COVID-19 to the prevent of monkeypox pandemic. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 50, 102441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Rizk, J.G.; Lippi, G.; Henry, B.; Forthal, D.; Rizk, Y. Prevention and treatment of monkeypox. Drugs 2022, 82, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rao, A.K.; Petersen, B.W.; Whitehill, F.; Razeq, J.H.; Isaacs, S.N.; Merchlinsky, M.J.; Campos-Outcalt, D.; Morgan, R.L.; Damon, I.; Sánchez, P.J.; et al. Use of JYNNEOS (Smallpox and Monkeypox Vaccine, Live, Nonreplicating) for Preexposure Vaccination of Persons at Risk for Occupational Exposure to Orthopoxviruses: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices—United States 2022. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Thy, M.; Peiffer-Smadja, N.; Mailhe, M.; Kramer, L.; Ferré, V.M.; Houhou, N.; Tarhini, H.; Bertin, C.; Beaumont, A.L.; Garé, M.; et al. Breakthrough infections after post-exposure vaccination against Monkeypox. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 387, 2477–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dashraath, P.; Nielsen-Saines, K.; Mattar, C.; Musso, D.; Tambyah, P.; Baud, D. Guidelines for pregnant individuals with monkeypox virus exposure. Lancet 2022, 400, 21–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. O’Shea, J. Interim guidance for prevention and treatment of monkeypox in persons with HIV infection—United States, August 2022. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Turner, M.; Mandia, J.; Keltner, C.; Haynes, R.; Faestel, P.; Mease, L. Monkeypox in patient immunized with ACAM2000 smallpox vaccine during 2022 outbreak. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2022, 28, 2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Stittelaar, K.J.; Neyts, J.; Naesens, L.; van Amerongen, G.; van Lavieren, R.F.; Holý, A.; De Clercq, E.; Niesters, H.G.M.; Fries, E.; Maas, C.; et al. Antiviral treatment is more effective than smallpox vaccination upon lethal monkeypox virus infection. Nature 2006, 439, 745–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ulloque-Badaracco, J.R.; Alarcón-Braga, E.A.; Hernandez-Bustamante, E.A.; Al-Kassab-Córdova, A.; Benites-Zapata, V.A.; Bonilla-Aldana, D.K.; Rodriguez-Morales, A.J. Acceptance towards Monkeypox Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lozano, J.M.; Muller, S. Monkeypox: Potential vaccine development strategies. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2022, 44, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vaccinated, W.S.G. Special Edition: Monkeypox Information & Vaccines; Gender & Sexuality Services, University of Northern Iowa: Cedar Falls, IA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  70. Gruber, M.F. Current status of monkeypox vaccines. NPJ Vaccines 2022, 7, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Agreement, P. Monkeypox Vaccination Program Provider Agreement. Available online: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/121243 (accessed on 17 January 2023).
  72. Mahase, E. Monkeypox: Fractional vaccine doses will be piloted as new treatment trial launches. Br. Med. J. Publ. Group 2022, 378, o2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sah, R.; Humayun, M.; Baig, E.; Farooq, M.; Hussain, H.G.; Shahid, M.U.; Cheema, H.A.; Chandran, D.; Yatoo, M.I.; Sharma, A.K.; et al. FDA’s authorized ‘JYNNEOS’ vaccine for counteracting monkeypox global public health emergency; an update–Correspondence. Int. J. Surg. 2022, 107, 106971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Meo, S.A.; Al-Masri, A.; Klonoff, D.; Alshahrani, A.; Al-Khlaiwi, T. Comparison of Biological, Pharmacological Characteristics, Indications, Contraindications and Adverse Effects of JYNNEOS and ACAM2000 Monkeypox Vaccines. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ansari, Z.; Ramzan, H.; Shakeel, R. Is there a need of monkeypox vaccine amidst the hesitancy of COVID-19 immunization in Pakistan? Ann. Med. Surg. 2022, 81, 104391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ajman, F.; Alenezi, S.; Alhasan, K.; Saddik, B.; Alhaboob, A.; Altawil, E.S.; Alshahrani, F.; Alrabiaah, A.; Alaraj, A.; Alkriadees, K.; et al. Healthcare workers’ worries and Monkeypox vaccine advocacy during the first month of the WHO Monkeypox alert: Cross-sectional survey in Saudi Arabia. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1408. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Payne, A.B. Incidence of monkeypox among unvaccinated persons compared with persons receiving ≥1 JYNNEOS vaccine dose—32 US jurisdictions, July 31–September 3, 2022. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  78. Islam, M.R.; Hossain, M.J.; Roy, A.; Hasan, A.H.M.N.; Rahman, M.A.; Shahriar, M.; Bhuiyan, M.A. Repositioning potentials of smallpox vaccines and antiviral agents in monkeypox outbreak: A rapid review on comparative benefits and risks. Health Sci. Rep. 2022, 5, e798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. See, K.C. Vaccination for monkeypox virus infection in humans: A review of key considerations. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Raccagni, A.R.; Candela, C.; Bruzzesi, E.; Mileto, D.; Canetti, D.; Rizzo, A.; Castagna, A.; Nozza, S. Real-life use of cidofovir for the treatment of severe monkeypox cases. J. Med. Virol. 2022, 95, e28218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kuroda, N.; Shimizu, T.; Hirano, D.; Ishikane, M.; Kataoka, Y. Lack of clinical evidence of antiviral therapy for human monkeypox: A scoping review. J. Infect. Chemother. 2022, 29, 228–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Hutson, C.L.; Kondas, A.V.; Mauldin, M.R.; Doty, J.B.; Grossi, I.M.; Morgan, C.N.; Ostergaard, S.D.; Hughes, C.M.; Nakazawa, Y.; Kling, C.; et al. Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a potential smallpox therapeutic, brincidofovir, in a lethal monkeypox virus animal model. mSphere 2021, 6, e00927-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. McCarthy, M.W. Therapeutic strategies to address monkeypox. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2022, 20, 1249–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ramalingam, K.; Amaechi, B.T. Phytochemicals: Their Therapeutic Potential Against Dental Caries. In Computational Techniques for Dental Image Analysis; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 238–275. [Google Scholar]
  85. Khalil, A.; Samara, A.; O’Brien, P.; Ladhani, S. Call for a unified approach to Monkeypox infection in pregnancy: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Desai, A.N.; Thompson, G.; Neumeister, S.; Arutyunova, A.; Trigg, K.; Cohen, S.H. Compassionate use of tecovirimat for the treatment of monkeypox infection. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2022, 328, 1348–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Warner, B.M.; Klassen, L.; Sloan, A.; Deschambault, Y.; Soule, G.; Banadyga, L.; Cao, J.; Strong, J.E.; Kobasa, D.; Safronetz, D. In vitro and in vivo efficacy of Tecovirimat against a recently emerged 2022 Monkeypox virus isolate. Sci. Transl. Med. 2022, 14, eade7646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. O’Laughlin, K.; Tobolowsky, F.A.; Elmor, R.; Overton, R.; O’Connor, S.M.; Damon, I.K.; Petersen, B.W.; Rao, A.K.; Chatham-Stephens, K.; Yu, P.; et al. Clinical use of tecovirimat (Tpoxx) for treatment of monkeypox under an investigational new drug protocol—United States, May–August 2022. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71. Available online: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/121112 (accessed on 18 January 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Kar, P.P.; Rath, B.; Ramani, Y.; Maharana, C.S. Amelioration of Cyclophosphamide induced immunosupression by the hydro-alcoholic extract of Gymnema sylvestre leaves in albino rats. Biomed. Pharmacol. J. 2019, 12, 251–258. [Google Scholar]
  90. Lai, C.-C.; Hsu, C.-K.; Yen, M.-Y.; Lee, P.-I.; Ko, W.-C.; Hsueh, P.-R. Monkeypox: An emerging global threat during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2022, 55, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Johri, N.; Kumar, D.; Nagar, P.; Maurya, A.; Vengat, M.; Jain, P. Clinical manifestations of human monkeypox infection and implications for outbreak strategy. Health Sci. Rev. 2022, 5, 100055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kozlov, M. Monkeypox in Africa: The science the world ignored. Nature 2022, 607, 17–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Huang, Y.A.; Howard-Jones, A.; Durrani, S.; Wang, Z.; Williams, P.C.M. Monkeypox: A clinical update for paediatricians. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2022, 58, 1532–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lum, F.M.; Torres-Ruesta, A.; Tay, M.Z.; Lin, R.T.; Lye, D.C.; Rénia, L.; Ng, L.F. Monkeypox: Disease epidemiology, host immunity and clinical interventions. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2022, 22, 597–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Goyal, L.; Ajmera, K.; Pandit, R.; Pandit, T. Prevention and treatment of monkeypox: A step-by-step guide for healthcare professionals and general population. Cureus 2022, 14, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kupferschmidt, K. Monkeypox vaccination plans take shape amid questions. Science 2022, 376, 1142–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lal, H.M.; Uthaman, A.; Thomas, S. Silver Nanoparticle as an Effective Antiviral Agent. In Polymer Nanocomposites Based on Silver Nanoparticles; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 247–265. [Google Scholar]
  98. Al Jurdi, A.; Kotton, C.N. Monkeypox in Transplant Recipients: No Breaks Between Outbreaks. Transplantation 2022, 106, e512–e513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Malik, S.; Muhammad, K.; Waheed, Y. Nanotechnology: A revoulation in modern industry. Molecules 2023, 28, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. A brief comparison of characteristics of approved mpox vaccines.
Table 1. A brief comparison of characteristics of approved mpox vaccines.
IMVAMUNE/JYNNEOSTM VaccineACAM2000® Vaccine
Vaccines based on live attenuated and replication deficient mechanism of action [38]Belongs to the category of live vaccinia virus [38]
No reaction at the inclusion site, no risk of inadvertent or autoinoculation reactions, and low risk of advertent transmission or vertical transmission due to replication incompetence [49]Cutaneous reaction at the inoculation site. Risk of inadvertent and autoinoculation and progressive vaccinia and eczema development especially in immunocompromised. Additionally, the transmission risk for the replicative potential [49]
Replication incompetent strains of vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN strain) are used [38,49,58,59,60,77]The vaccinia virus strains are kept replication competent [77]
It is referred to as a “third-generation vaccine” [58,59,60]It is referred to as a “second-generation vaccine” [77]
Can be used even in immunodeficient persons [58,59,60]Reduced symptoms but possible side effects in immunocompromised people [89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97].
Not for the general population but for pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis.Not available for the public even in endemic regions.
Storage Freeze-dried/subcutaneousStorage Lyophilized/scarification
Authorized by EMA in 2013 and FDA in 2019 for the general population [83]Received FDA licensure in 2007 for a specific group of populations [97]
Approved for smallpox with the name IMVANEX®, used for 18 years or older; 85% effective against mpox [81]It replaced orthopoxvirus vaccine Dryvax [89]
It is produced by modified vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) strains that are grown in cell culture of primary chicken embryo fibroblast (CEF) cells.It is manufactured by allowing NYCBH strain culturation in Vero cells.
Table
Table 2. Two other vaccines candidates in trials against mpox.
Table 2. Two other vaccines candidates in trials against mpox.
VaccineReplicating PotentialStorage/RouteRegulatory Status
Dryvax®YesFreeze-dried/scarificationDiscontinued manufacturing in the 1980s. Replaced with the new vaccine
LC16m8YesLyophilized, scarificationLicensed for use in Japan
Table
Table 3. Summary of some anti-viral agents against mpox.
Table 3. Summary of some anti-viral agents against mpox.
Sr.no.Drug CategoriesMechanismDrug Formulations under InvestigationImportance InterventionsReferences
1DNA polymerase inhibitorsInhibit DNA replicationNucleoside phosphonates
Cidofovir and Brincidofovir
HPMA and adenosine N1 oxide (ANO)		Ongoing trials, No effective tests from compounds such as acyclovir, brovavir, lobucavir, didanosine, ddC, or d4C, etc.[82,98]
2Inosine monophosphate (IMP) dehydrogenase inhibitorsInhibition of viral replicationRibavirin and TiazofurinOngoing trials[65,80,90]
3S-Adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) hydrolase inhibitorsInhibit viral replication3-deazaneplanocin A (C3-NPC A) and carbocyclic-3-deazaadenosine (C-CA3-ADO)High sensitivity to different viruses, potent antiviral effects exhibited in vivo tests, limited or no side effects[98]
4mRNA and protein synthesis inhibitorsReplication inhibition33T57/Methisazone (Marboran®)Not licensed yet, 30–40% efficacy, may promote side effects such as nausea and vomiting[77,81]
5Nucleoside analogues inhibitorInhibit the DNA replication processNioch-14Easy to produce strong antiviral activity against many orthopoxviruses[91]
6Combination therapyCombination therapy
Live attenuated viruses +antiviral drug		ACAM2000 and Tecovirimat combination therapyIn vivo animal testing models (Cynomolgus macaques and Rhesus macaques)[77,91]
7combination therapyNucleotide analogsCidofovir and Elstree-RIVMIn vivo animal testing models (Cynomolgus macaques)[58,77,83,91,98]
8Antiviral agentNucleotide analog and a DNA polymerase inhibitor
Modified cidofovir compound; inhibits DNA polymerase		CMX001In vivo animal testing models (Rabbit)[81]
9combination therapyvaccinia virus + F13L gene inhibitionACAM2000 and TecovirimatIn vivo animal testing (Cynomolgus macaques)[59,81,90]
10Antiviral agentInhibits release of intracellular virusST246In vivo animal testing (Cynomys ludovicianus)[59,81]
11ImmunomodulatorsImmune system modulation(A27L, VACV A33R, L1R, and B5R) Subunit vaccines and recombinant vaccineIn vivo animal testing[34,81]
12Antiviral agentsInhibition of viral replicationRNA interference (siE8-d and siA6-a), Methisazone (Marboran), Hydroxyurea, DFBAIn vitro (cultured LLC-MK2 cells).
Limited activities.		[49,65,88]
13Bio-based markersTargeted antiviral agentsActin beta, Deoxythymidylate kinase, Annexin A1, Ubiquitin, Fi colin 2, Interferon-gamma, Interleukin 15, GTP cyclohydrolase I feedback regulator Membrane associated ring-CH-type finger 1, MNAT1 component of CDK Activating kinase, Makorin ring finger protein 3Specific peptidase 9 X-linked Retinoid X receptor alpha, IL-12A, Major histocompatibility complex, STAT3, Calpastatin cyclin dependent kinase 5, WASP actin nucleation promoting factor, SH3 domain binding protein 4, T cell receptor beta variable 20/OR9-2, TNF, Tyrosinase, Uroplakin 3B.Ongoing trials[2,3,34,35,38,48,64,65,85,92,93]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Malik, S.; Ahmad, T.; Ahsan, O.; Muhammad, K.; Waheed, Y. Recent Developments in Mpox Prevention and Treatment Options. Vaccines 2023, 11, 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030500

AMA Style

Malik S, Ahmad T, Ahsan O, Muhammad K, Waheed Y. Recent Developments in Mpox Prevention and Treatment Options. Vaccines. 2023; 11(3):500. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030500

Chicago/Turabian Style

Malik, Shiza, Tahir Ahmad, Omar Ahsan, Khalid Muhammad, and Yasir Waheed. 2023. "Recent Developments in Mpox Prevention and Treatment Options" Vaccines 11, no. 3: 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030500

APA Style

Malik, S., Ahmad, T., Ahsan, O., Muhammad, K., & Waheed, Y. (2023). Recent Developments in Mpox Prevention and Treatment Options. Vaccines, 11(3), 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030500

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop