Next Article in Journal
Importance of Education about Cervical Cancer and Its Preventive Measures for the Promotion of HPV Vaccine According to the WHO Strategies
Next Article in Special Issue
COVID-19 Vaccination: The Mainspring of Challenges and the Seed of Remonstrance
Previous Article in Journal
Passive Immunisation against RHDV2 Induces Protection against Disease but Not Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Rise of Vectored Vaccines: A Legacy of the COVID-19 Global Crisis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

COVID-19 Vaccine Platforms: Challenges and Safety Contemplations

1
Department of Biomedical Science, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
2
Biomedical Research Center, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
3
Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research Unit, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2021, 9(10), 1196; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101196
Submission received: 9 September 2021 / Revised: 8 October 2021 / Accepted: 10 October 2021 / Published: 18 October 2021

Abstract

:
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become a pandemic as of March 2020, creating a global crisis and claiming millions of lives. To halt the pandemic and alleviate its impact on society, economy, and public health, the development of vaccines and antiviral agents against SARS-CoV-2 was a dire need. To date, various platforms have been utilized for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development, and over 200 vaccine candidates have been produced, many of which have obtained the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for emergency use. Despite this successful development and licensure, concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of these vaccines have arisen, given the unprecedented speed of vaccine development and the newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 strains and variants. In this review, we summarize the different platforms used for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine development, discuss their strengths and limitations, and highlight the major safety concerns and potential risks associated with each vaccine type.

1. Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), first reported in late 2019 in Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province in Central China, has become a global pandemic with devastating effects worldwide [1]. Since then, and until 29 June 2021, this newly emerging disease caused by the enveloped SARS-CoV-2 virus, which belongs to the Coronaviridae family and the lineage B of the betacoronavirus (β-CoV) genera, has brought over 181 million confirmed cases and claimed the lives of about 4 million people worldwide [1]. SARS-CoV-2 has a positive-sense, single-stranded genome that encodes a large non-structural polyprotein (ORF1a/b) proteolytically cleaved to generate proteins, four of which are structural proteins including spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N) (Figure 1a) [2,3]. Among these proteins, the S surface glycoprotein plays a critical role in receptor recognition and attachment to host cells [4]. The S protein also induces T-cell responses and is the main target of highly potent neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against the virus, presenting it as the major antigenic pick out for vaccine design [5]. The structure of SARS-CoV-2 is similar to other β-CoVs, including the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and the Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (MERS-CoV), the causative agents of SARS and MERS, two previously reported viral pneumonia disease outbreaks, respectively [6]. Compared to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV; however, SARS-CoV-2 has higher infectivity and transmissibility due to its high-affinity binding to the host cell receptors and high viral shedding levels during the early stage of infection, contributing to the vastly infectious nature of asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients [7,8,9]. As initial measures to control the disease spread, the COVID-19 pandemic was primarily withstood through social distancing, hygiene measures, and repurposed drugs [10]. Some countries’ implemented measures were relatively emollient and particularly designated to control the disease by achieving herd immunity following natural infection [11,12].
Therefore, despite the taken measures and as a consequence of not implementing immediate lockdown, the COVID-19 death toll increased [13,14]. This necessitated the development of an effective and safe vaccine as an imperative solution to control the pandemic and prevent future outbreaks [13,15]. As such, and since the release of the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence in January 2020, all efforts have been directed towards COVID-19 vaccines development [16,17]. The hope and hype placed on vaccines to prevail over the disease stand up from the success of previously developed vaccines to control other infectious diseases [13]. The route for vaccine development; however, was not always paved, and several historical attempts of vaccines production were doomed with defeats [18]. Until today, and despite all the knowledge and technology at one’s disposal, scientists are still unable to conclude the safest and most effective vaccine platform [18]. Back in time, particularly following the outbreak of SARS-CoV in 2002, vaccines against the emerging virus were also developed, a few of which reached phase I clinical trials; yet, did not achieve the final stages and obtain the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval as the virus was eradicated from the human population in 2004 [16,19,20,21]. Similarly, several vaccines against MERS-CoV were under development, none of which have obtained FDA approved thus far [21]. Within the same notion, and in relay for safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine production, censorious steps are currently followed in all phases of COVID-19 vaccine development, including manufacturing, dispersal, and vaccination [22]. For the time being, many of the newly developed COVID-19 vaccines are undergoing clinical evaluation and have reached phase III of clinical trials. A few of which have been approved for emergency use [13] (Figure 2a, Table 1), with the research and discovery phase being skipped [21,23]. Several approaches, including traditional platforms (inactivated and live attenuated virus vaccines), and newly established ones (replicating and non-replicating viral vector vaccines, nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) vaccines, recombinant subunit vaccines, and peptide-based/virus-like particles vaccines), have been adopted for COVID-19 vaccine development (Figure 1b–h) [16,24,25]. As of 29 June 2021, and according to the World Health Organization (WHO), out of the 293 total COVID-19 vaccine candidates, 105 are currently in the clinical phase of development and 184 are still in the pre-clinical phase (Figure 2a) [26].Presently, and besides the FDA consideration of the possibility of booster vaccine shots, several standpoints are now advocating the notion that “hybrid immunity” and “the mix and match of different vaccines strategy” could provide an even stronger immune boost, presenting such approaches, if supported by data, as plausible pandemic game-changers. In this review, we detail the different COVID-19 vaccine platforms and highlight their strengths, limitations, and major risks and safety concerns associated with each type, particularly those relevant to the fast-track pace taken for their production. We also summarize all candidate COVID-19 vaccines currently in the clinical phase of development and categorize them according to the platform used for their development.

2. Contemporary COVID-19 Vaccine Platforms and Allied Safety and Efficacy Concerns

2.1. Inactivated Vaccine

Purified inactivated viruses have been widely used for over a century in vaccine development against various emerging infectious diseases, including influenza, polio, rabies, and hepatitis A [27,28,29,30,31]. Today, inactivated vaccines are typically produced by propagating the virus in cell culture systems, followed by purification, concentration, and chemical and/or physical inactivation to demolish infectivity while retaining immunogenicity (Figure 1b) [32,33]. This type of vaccine is notably featured by its highly efficient proliferation and genetic stability [34]; yet, limited by the viral yield in a cell culture setting, the requirement of a biosafety level 3 facility, and the short duration of the elicited immune response, possibly making the vaccines less effective in preventing viral entry [33,35]. Up to date, 16 inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been developed and are currently in clinical trial phases (Figure 2b) [26]. One of which, for example, is the Sinovac’s CoronaVac vaccine candidate which has demonstrated sufficient safety and efficacy in phase III of clinical trials in Brazil, Turkey, and Indonesia and is currently in phase IV of clinical trials (Table 1) [26,34,36,37,38,39]. Another is the BBIBP-CorV vaccine candidate, which showed adequate humoral immune responses in adults aged 18 years and above and currently stands in phase IV of clinical trials (Table 1) [39,40,41]. Both vaccines have been listed by the WHO for COVID-19 Emergency Use (EUL) and are presently being adopted by several countries worldwide. Despite these promising data, concerns of using inactivated virus vaccines platforms against COVID-19 still reside, some of which relate to the difficulty of confirming a complete virus inactivation status, a risk that could translate into a scenario similar to the 1955 Cutter incident where children receiving the polio vaccine were infected with the inactivated poliovirus [33,42]. Into the bargain, although several developed inactivated SARS-CoV vaccines have been reported to induce nAbs, vaccinated animals still display significant disease upon challenge, which could explain why no vaccines are currently licensed for SARS-CoV [43]. Further, previous studies on animal models have shown that immunizations with inactivated SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV vaccines are associated with hypersensitive-type lung pathology post-challenges with the infectious virus [32,44,45,46]. Similarly, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) formalin-inactivated vaccine has been reported to cause enhanced pulmonary disease after live RSV infection [47,48]. In addition, it was suggested that treating the vaccine with formalin could have altered the epitopes, inducing functional antibodies, causing the immune system to produce antibodies against non-protective epitopes [33,49]. It is worth noting here that none of these concerns and/or complications of using inactivated virus vaccines have been thus far reported from the use of recently developed COVID-19 inactivated vaccines.

2.2. Live Attenuated Vaccine

Live attenuated vaccines, which embody a weakened version of the live virus with reduced virulence, are considered one of the oldest and most effective immunization approaches to elicit life-long immune responses (Figure 1c) [32,50]. A remarkable advantage of such a vaccine type is its relatively low production and delivery costs, given that the attenuated virus can replicate and propagate within the host. As such, a relatively small dose of the virus can be enough to induce immunity [51]. Moreover, live attenuated vaccines can be given intranasally, allowing the attenuated virus to replicate in the mucosal tissue of the upper respiratory tract, a major portal for coronaviruses entry into the host [52]. For the time being, only six SARS-CoV-2 live attenuated virus vaccines have been developed, four of which are in the pre-clinical phase, and two are in phase I of clinical trials (Figure 2b, Table 1) [26]. Both COVI-VAC and MV-014-212 vaccines are attenuated via codon pair deoptimization, a strategy that involves synthetic recoding of the viral genome by amending the positions of synonymous codons, thereby raising the number of suboptimal codon pairs and cytosine phosphoguanine (CpG) dinucleotides in the recoded genome [25,53,54,55]. In parallel to live attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine studies, ongoing studies on other live attenuated virus vaccines such as the RSV vaccine have shown success in using the codon pair deoptimization strategy in vaccine production evidenced by the robust humoral and cellular immune responses triggered in non-human primates [56].
Despite the aforementioned advantages and the pulled off accomplishments of using live attenuated virus vaccine in combating different infectious diseases, the overt risk of using such a type of vaccine still resides in the use of a live replicating virus, which can revert under any condition to its pathologic phenotype, causing disease after vaccination, especially in immunocompromised individuals [57,58]. Although this anticipated scenario is considered relatively rare, the degree of unpredictability regarding the virus stability and the arising safety considerations after that should never be ruled out [59]. Further, live attenuated vaccines could result in viral shedding into the environment, posing a potential risk to the unvaccinated community [60]. It also goes without saying that these highlighted disadvantages are acquainted with time consumption and technical difficulties associated with the virus modification approaches if such a vaccine platform is to be implemented [16].

2.3. Viral Vector Vaccine

Viral vector vaccines, in both replicating and non-replicating forms, utilize modified viruses such as adenoviruses or poxviruses as the vector to deliver the genetic material coding for a viral antigen of interest into the host cell (Figure 1d) [57,61]. In self-replicating (replication-competent) viral vector-based vaccines, and through the host cell machinery used by the virus vector, new viral particles are produced in infected cells, which then infect other new cells, resulting in additional vaccine antigen production [62]. On the contrary, non-replicating (replication-incompetent or deficient) viral vector-based vaccines cannot produce new viral particles, and the host cell machinery is used to produce the vaccine antigens, after which the viral vector gets cleared [61,62]. Both viral vector vaccine forms do not cause infection from neither the loaded virus nor the viral vector as the delivered genetic material does not become integrated into the host genome [61,63]. Typically, the advantage of this type of vaccine lies in promoting the expression of viral antigens within infected host cells for efficient major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class II presentation [61]. Moreover, viral vectors are characterized by their high gene transduction efficiency, high specificity of genes delivered to target cells, and the immune response they elicit with increased cellular response [64]. Further, although viral vector vaccines are generally considered less robust than traditional vaccine types, the fact that they persist as genetic material in the host, directly infect antigen-presenting cells, and possess a strong inherent adjuvant activity triggering innate and adaptive immune responses and generating high titers of nAbs, could suffice a single vaccine dose for adequate immunization as in the case of the vesicular-stomatitis virus -(VSV)-based Ervebo vaccine against Ebola virus [62,63,65]. In COVID-19 vector-based vaccine production, replicating and non-replicating vectors have been utilized to deliver genes encoding for either the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein or the receptor-binding domain (RBD) [16,26]. Thus far, vaccinia and adenovirus are the predominantly used virus vectors for vectored vaccines development [64]. The adenovirus, for example, has been previously utilized in developing SARS-CoV vaccines expressing the S and N proteins [32,43,66]. Currently, it is also being used for developing COVID-19 vector-based vaccines. Up to date, 4 replicating and 17 non-replicating COVID-19 vector-based vaccines have been developed, of which 2 have reached phase III clinical trials, and 3 are currently in phase IV (Table 1, Figure 2b) [26]. All five vaccines are adenovirus-based non-replicating vaccines containing the gene encoding for SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein [67,68,69,70]. Among these vaccines, Janssen’s (Ad26.COV2.S) vaccine has recently received the FDA EUA for use in in 18 years old and elder individuals after showing good efficacy data in phase III of clinical trials [71]. Although the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine showed around 65–66% efficacy in moderate to severe/critical and around 76–83% in severe/critical COVID-19 patients, its efficacy dropped to 52 and 64% against the Beta (B.1.351) variant in moderate to severe/critical disease conditions, respectively [69] (Table 1). Low efficacy data were also reported for AstraZeneca vaccine against the Beta variant, with an efficiency of 10.4% only reported in South Africa and 48% in Canada [72,73], contrarily to the 70.4% retained efficacy against the Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant as reported in a study conducted in the UK [74]. The other three viral vector vaccines at stages II/III–IV of clinical development are CanSino’s adenovirus type-5 (Ad5) vectored vaccine, Gamaleya Research Institute’s Gam-COVID-Vac vaccine, and ReiThera’s GRAd-COV2 (Table 1). Although clinical trials have revealed that these vaccines are tolerable and immunogenic, age and the presence of high pre-existing anti-adenovirus immunity were shown to partly diminish vaccination-induced specific antibody and T-cell responses [68]. To overcome pre-existing immunity to the adenovirus in vaccinated individuals, a plausible approach could be using a heterologous recombinant vector as in the Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) vaccine, the only heterologous COVID-19 vaccine that uses both adenovirus 26 (Ad26) and adenovirus 5 (Ad5) as vectors to express the SARS-CoV-2 S protein [70,75]. Of note, the general principle of prime-boost with two distinct vectors was not exclusively used in recent COVID-19 vaccine platforms but has been largely implemented experimentally and was also previously used in developing the GamEvac-Combi Ebola virus vaccine [76].

2.4. Nucleic Acid (DNA and RNA)-Based Vaccine

In nucleic acid-based vaccines, only the genetic material (DNA or RNA), but not the recombinant/live virus, is taken up by host cells and translated into the protein to elicit an immune response (Figure 1e,f) [77]. Although various messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines, including those against influenza, Zika, and rabies viruses, have been thus far developed, this vaccine development platform is still considered relatively new [78]. The pronounced advantage of some types of nucleic acid vaccines generally lies in the large-scale production pace and cost [16]. DNA vaccines, for example, are based on the use of highly stable plasmid DNA that can be easily propagated at a large scale in bacteria, as the plasmid DNA typically encloses mammalian expression promoters and the gene encoding the protein of interest [16]. On the other hand, presenting mRNA vaccines as promising alternatives for conventional vaccines mainly lies in the ability to produce the vaccine completely in vivo, along with their high potency, cost-effectiveness, rapid development, and safe delivery [16,78,79]. Currently, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are among the most commonly used in vivo RNA delivery vectors, protecting the mRNA from enzymatic degradation and facilitating endocytosis and endosomal escape [80]. Contrarily to the highlighted recognition of mRNA vaccines, the physiochemical properties of the mRNA that may impact its cellular and organ dispersal, the questioned safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccine use in humans, them being unlikely to induce strong mucosal immunity due to their intramuscular administration, and the uncertainty from what could arise with large-scale production, storage, and stability are among the alarming concerns tailored to mRNA vaccines production [16,57,80]. Likewise, potential disadvantages also relate to DNA vaccines, particularly those relevant to their low immunogenicity and to the need of DNA molecules to traverse the nuclear membrane to be transcribed, necessitating complicated delivery systems such as electroporators for better efficiency [16,57]. In addition, introducing mutation and dysregulated gene expression by the plausible stable integration of transfected DNA into the somatic or germline host cells genome is another arising concern [81] though unconventional as per relevant follow-up studies [82,83,84,85]. Up to date, 28 nucleic acids (10 DNA and 18 mRNA)-based COVID-19 vaccines have been developed and are currently in the clinical stages, and 24 mRNA vaccines are in the pre-clinical stage (Figure 2b, Table 1) [26]. Two mRNA-based vaccines, developed by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna, are currently in phase IV clinical trials and have received the FDA EUA for protection against COVID-19 [26,86,87]. Preliminary results showed astoundingly 94–95% efficacy for both vaccines [88,89]. Though promising, a major concern relevant to mRNA vaccines resides in their rapid pace of development and the uncertainty of potential long-term adverse effects associated with them, particularly because these are the first approved mRNA vaccines with no other FDA-approved mRNA vaccines to date [90]. Another concern is the efficacy of these vaccines against the newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants with mutations in the S protein, the main target in COVID-19 vaccines development [91]. As of yet, Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was reported to protect against four variants of concern (VOCs), including Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta (Table 1) [91,92,93,94]. Interestingly, a recent study by Zakhartchouk et al. reported that combining DNA vaccine and whole killed virus vaccines augments immune responses to SARS-CoV [95], a propitious tactic worth considering in ongoing COVID-19 vaccine development approaches [95].

2.5. Protein Subunit and Virus-Like Particles Vaccine

As compared to the whole-pathogen vaccine platform, a protein subunit vaccine is composed of in vitro harvested and highly purified viral protein antigens carefully chosen for their ability to elicit an immune response (Figure 1g) [96]. Being incapable of causing disease, the protein subunit vaccine platform is considered safer than the whole-virus (live attenuated and inactivated) platforms [97]. Not displaying the full antigenic complexity of the virus and enclosing small antigens deficient of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs); however, it may promote skewed immune responses, bringing the immunogenicity potential and protective efficacy of protein subunit vaccines into question [57,97]. Subunit vaccine design and production could be also costly and might necessitate specific adjuvants to boost the immune response [98], in addition to the potential occurrence of antigen denaturation, which could lead to non-specific binding [99]. Examples of developed subunit vaccines include the recombinant RBD subunit vaccine, which was reported to elicit partial protective immunity in rhesus macaques against MERS-CoV challenge [100], and S protein-based subunit vaccines against SARS-CoV infection with potency to induce nAbs and protect against SARS-CoV intranasal infection in mice [32,101]. Up to date, 33 COVID-19 protein subunit vaccines based on the S protein or the RBD have been developed and are in the clinical stages. Of which, 10 vaccines, including Novavax’s (NVX-CoV2373) are in phase III [26,102]. Recent reports showed that a two-dose regimen of the NVX-CoV2373 vaccine exhibited 89.7% efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection, with high efficacy against the Alpha, Beta, and other VOCs [102,103] (Table 1). Virus-like particles (VLPs) vaccine is another type of protein-based vaccine composed of proteins from the viral capsid only with no viral genetic material (Figure 1h) [57,104]. In addition to being safe, VLPs elicit potent immune responses due to their repetitive structures [104]. VLP vaccines against many viruses, including Hepatitis B virus, Human papillomaviruses, and Influenza A virus, do exist [104,105,106,107]. Likewise, VLP vaccines against MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV infection have been also developed, with eosinophilic pulmonary immunopathology detected after viral challenge in some cases [21,46,108]. For the COVID-19 status quo particularly, five VLPs vaccines in different phases of clinical trials are thus far available (Figure 2b, Table 1) [26].
Table 1. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Candidates in Clinical Development Stages.
Table 1. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Candidates in Clinical Development Stages.
Platform/Vaccine TypeNo.Vaccine NameNumber of Doses (Dosage)Dosing ScheduleRoute of AdministrationDeveloper/ManufacturerConstruct and/or Targeted SARS-CoV-2 ProteinCurrent Stage of Clinical Trial (Recruitment Status)Efficacy *Current Approvals/AuthorizationsReference
Inactivated virus1CoronaVac2 doses (3 μg)Day 0 + 14IMSinovac Research and Development Co., Ltd.Whole inactivated SARS-CoV-2 with aluminum hydroxide adjuvantPhase IV (Not yet recruiting)Efficacy from clinical trials:
Brazil: 50.7% against symptomatic disease ≥14 d after 2 doses.
Turkey: 83.5% against symptomatic disease ≥14 d after 2 doses.
Indonesia: 65.3% against symptomatic disease ≥14 d after 2 doses.
Efficacy/effectiveness against variants:
Chile (predominant circulation of P.1 and B.1.1.7.): 67% against symptomatic disease ≥28 d after 2 doses.
Brazil (predominant circulation of P.2 and P.1 lineages): 50.7% and 36.8% against symptomatic disease ≥14 d after 2 doses, respectively.
WHO EUL
Approved in 37 countries 1
[26,36,37,38,109,110,111,112]
Inactivated virus2BBIBP-CorV2 doses (4 μg)Day 0 + 21 IMSinopharm + China National Biotec Group Co + Beijing Institute of Biological ProductsWhole inactivated SARS-CoV-2Phase IV (Recruiting)Efficacy from clinical trials in UAE, Bahrain, Egypt, and Jordan: 78.1% against symptomatic disease ≥14 d after 2 doses, and 79% against hospitalization.WHO EUL
Approved in 56 countries 2
[26,34,39,41,110,113]
Inactivated virus3Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Vero cell)2–3 doses (5 μg)Day 0 + 21 + 42 or 111 or 171 IMSinopharm + China National Biotec Group Co + Wuhan Institute of Biological ProductsWhole inactivated SARS-CoV-2 with aluminum hydroxide adjuvantPhase III (Completed)Efficacy from clinical trials in UAE, Bahrain, Egypt, and Jordan: 72.8% against symptomatic disease ≥14 d after 2 doses, and 79% against hospitalization.WHO EUL (Approval pending)
China
[26,40,110,114,115]
Inactivated virus4Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Vero cell)2 doses (50, 100, or 150 EU)Day 0 + 14IMInstitute of Medical Biology + Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesWhole inactivated SARS-CoV-2 with Al(OH)3 adjuvantPhase III (Enrolling by invitation)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,116,117]
Inactivated virus5QazCovid-in2 dosesDay 0 + 21 IMResearch Institute for Biological Safety Problems, Rep of KazakhstanWhole inactivated SARS-CoV-2Phase III (Active, not recruiting)Efficacy from clinical trials in the Republic of Kazakhstan: 96%Republic of Kazakhstan[26,118,119]
Inactivated virus6BBV152 (COVAXIN) 2 doses (3 or 6 μg)Day 0 + 14 IMBharat Biotech International LimitedWhole inactivated SARS-CoV-2 with Algel-IMDG adjuvantPhase III (Active, not recruiting)Efficacy from clinical trials:
77.8% against symptomatic disease, 93.4% against severe disease, 63.6% against asymptomatic disease.
Efficacy/effectiveness against variants: 65.2% against disease caused by Delta (B.617.2) variant.
WHO EUL (Approval pending)
Approved in 9 countries 3
[26,110,120,121,122,123]
Inactivated virus7Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Vero cell) 2 dosesDay 0 + 28IMShenzhen Kangtai Biological Products Co., Ltd. Whole inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Phase III (Not yet recruiting)NRChina[26,124]
Inactivated virus8VLA20012 dosesDay 0 + 21IMValneva, National Institute for Health Research, United KingdomWhole inactivated SARS-CoV-2 with high S-protein density, in combination with two adjuvants, alum and CpG 1018Phase III (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,125]
Inactivated virus9ERUCOV-VAC (TURKOVAC)2 doses (3 μg)Day 0 + 28IMErciyes University + Health Institutes of TurkeyWhole inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Phase III (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,126]
Inactivated virus10COVID-19 inactivated vaccine2 doses (5 μg)Day 0 + 28IMShifa Pharmed Industrial CoWhole inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Phase II–III (Recruitment complete)NRIran[26,127]
Inactivated virus11FAKHRAVAC (MIVAC)2 doses (10 µg)Day 0 + 14 IMOrganization of Defensive Innovation and ResearchWhole inactivated SARS-CoV-2Phase II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,128]
Inactivated virus12Inactivated (NDV-based) chimeric vaccine 2 dosesDay 0 + 28IMThe Government Pharmaceutical Organization (GPO) + PATH + DynavaxWhole inactivated NDV chimera stably expressing membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 S protein +/− CpG 1018 adjuvantPhase I–II (NR)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,129]
Inactivated virus13KD-4142 dosesDay 0 + 28IMKM Biologics Co., Ltd.Whole inactivated SARS-CoV-2Phase I–II (Not Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,130]
Inactivated virus14Koçak-19 2 doses (4 or 6 µg)Day 0 + 21IMKocak Farma, TurkeyWhole inactivated SARS-CoV-2 with adjuvantPhase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,131]
Inactivated virus15Adjuvanted inactivated vaccine 2 doses (10 µg-3M or 20 µg-6M)Day 0 + 20SCThe Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBITAK) Whole inactivated SARS-CoV-2 with CpG ODN adjuvantPhase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,132]
Inactivated virus16Live recombinant (rNDV) vector vaccine2 dosesDay 0 + 21IM or INLaboratorio Avi-MexLive recombinant NDV vector expressing SARS-CoV-2 S proteinPhase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,133]
Live-attenuated virus1COVI-VAC1–2 dosesDay 0 or Day 0 + 28INCodagenix, Inc + Serum Institute of IndiaWhole SARS-CoV-2 with all viral proteins Phase I (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,134]
Live-attenuated virus2MV-014-2121 doseDay 0INMeissa Vaccines, Inc.RSV expressing SARS-CoV-2 S proteinPhase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,55,135]
Viral vector (non-replicating)1ChAdO x 1 AZD12222 doses (standard dose: 5 × 1010 viral particles, low dose: 2.2 × 1010 viral particles)Day 0 + 28IMAstraZeneca + University of OxfordChimpanzee adenovirus-vectored vaccine (ChAdOx1) expressing S proteinPhase IV (Recruiting)Efficacy from clinical trials in UK, Brazil, and South Africa: 66.7%–70.4% overall efficacy ≥14 d after 2 doses, 62.1% after 2 standard doses76.0% after single low dose within 20–90 d, 90.0% after one low dose and one standard dose.
Real-world effectiveness:
England: 60–75% after 1 dose.
Scotland: 88% against hospitalization 28–34 d after 1 dose.
U.S: 76% in adults, and 85% in elderly (≥65 y).
Efficacy/effectiveness against variants:
UK: 70.4% against Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant, 81.5% against non-B.1.1.7 lineages.
South Africa: 10.4% against Beta (B.1.351) variant.
England: 76.0% after 1 dose, 86.0% after 2 doses against Beta variant. 71.0% after 1 dose, 92.0% after 2 doses against Delta variant.
Canada: 68% ≥ 14 d after dose 1 against symptomatic infection caused by Alpha variant.
48% ≥ 14 d after 1 dose against symptomatic infection caused by Beta or Gamma (P.1) variants.
67% ≥ 14 d after 1 dose against symptomatic infection caused by Delta variant.
WHO EUL
Approved in 118 countries 4 and issued an
Endorsed by ART
CARPHA EU recommendation EMA approved
[67,72,73,74,93,110,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145]
Viral vector (non-replicating)2Convidicea (Ad5-nCoV)1 dose (5 × 1010 viral particles per dose)Day 0 IMCanSino Biological Inc. + Beijing Institute of BiotechnologyRecombinant replication-defective human type 5 adenovirus (Ad5) expressing S proteinPhase IV (Active, not recruiting)Efficacy from clinical trials in Pakistan, Russia, Argentina, Mexico, and Chile: 68.8% and 65.7% against symptomatic disease ≥14 d and ≥28 d after vaccination, respectively. 95.5% and 91.0% against severe disease ≥14 d and ≥28 d after vaccination, respectively.WHO EUL (Approval pending)
Approved in 8 countries 5
[26,110,146,147,148,149,150,151]
Viral vector (non-replicating)3Ad26.COV2.S1 dose (5 × 1010 viral particles per dose)Day 0IMJanssen PharmaceuticalRecombinant replication-incompetent adenovirus serotype 26 (Ad26) vector encoding full-length and stabilized S proteinPhase IV (NR)Efficacy from clinical trials in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, South Africa, and the U.S: 66.3-76.3% and 65.5-83.5% against moderate to severe/critical disease ≥14 d and ≥28d after vaccination, respectively.
Real-world efficacy:
U.S. and India: 76.7% against infection ≥14 d after vaccination.
Efficacy/effectiveness against variants:
South Africa (95% predominant B.1.351 variant): 52.0–73.1% and 64.0–81.7% against moderate to severe/critical disease ≥14 d and ≥28 d after vaccination, respectively.
Brazil (69% predominant P.2 lineages): 66.2–68.1% and 81.9–87.6% against moderate to severe/critical disease ≥14 d and ≥28 d after vaccination, respectively.
FDA EUA
WHO EUL
Approved in 55 countries 6
Endorsed by ART
EMA approved
[26,69,71,110,145,152,153]
Viral vector (non-replicating)4Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V)2 doses (1 × 1011 viral particles per dose)Day 0 + 21 (first: rAd26-S; second: rAd5-S)IMGamaleya Research Institute + Health Ministry of the Russian FederationRecombinant Ad26 and recombinant Ad5 encoding full-length S protein (rAd26-S and rAd5-S)Phase III (Active, not recruiting)Efficacy from clinical trials: 91.6% overall efficacy against symptomatic disease, 100% against moderate-severe disease, 73.1% after 1 dose, 91.1% after 2 doses.
Efficacy/effectiveness against variants:
90% against Delta variant.
WHO EUL (Approval pending)
Approved in 69 countries 7
[26,110,154,155,156,157]
Viral vector (non-replicating)5GRAd-COV21–2 doses (1 × 1011 viral particles per dose)Day 0 + 21IMReiThera + Leukocare + UnivercellsReplication defective Simian Adenovirus (GRAd) encoding S proteinPhase II–III (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,158,159,160]
Viral vector (non-replicating)6LV-SMENP-DC1 dose (5 × 106 cells of LV-DC vaccine and 1 × 108 antigen-specific CTLs)Day 0SC (LV-DC vaccine) and IV (antigen-specific CTLs)Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical InstituteModified dendritic cells (DC) with lentivirus vectors (LV) expressing minigenes SMENP and immune-modulatory genes. Cytotoxic T-cells (CTLs) are activated by LV-DC, presenting specific viral antigensPhase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,161]
Viral vector (non-replicating)7hAd5-S-Fusion + N-ETSD vaccine1 dose (5 × 1010 IU/ dose SC, 1 × 1010 IU/ dose SL)Day 0 SC, oral, or SLImmunityBio, Inc. + NantKwest, Inc.Human second-generation adenovirus 5 (hAd5) encoding S and N antigensPhase I–II (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,162,163,164]
Viral vector (non-replicating)8AdCLD-CoV19 1 dose (2.5 × 1010, 5 × 1010, or 1 × 1011 virus particles per dose)Day 0IMCellid Co., Ltd.Replication-defective human adenovirus type 5/35 vector expressing S proteinPhase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,165]
Viral vector (non-replicating)9COVIVAC2 doses (1 × 107 IU, 5 × 107 IU, or 1 × 108 IU per dose)Day 0 + 28IMInstitute of Vaccines and Medical Biologicals, VietnamNDV expressing membrane-anchored pre-fusion-stabilized trimeric S protein +/− CpG 1018 adjuvantPhase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,166]
Viral vector (non-replicating)10MVA-SARS-2-ST2 doses (1 × 107 IU, or 1 × 108 IU per dose)Day 0 + 28IMUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf + German Center for Infection ResearchMVA vector expressing stabilized S proteinPhase I–II (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,167]
Viral vector (non-replicating)11MVA-SARS-2-S2 doses (1 × 107 IU, or 1 × 108 IU per dose)Day 0 + 28IMUniversity of Munich (Ludwig-Maximilians)MVA vector expressing S proteinPhase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,168]
Viral vector (non-replicating)12VXA-CoV2-11–2 doses (1 × 1010 IU, or 1 × 1011 IU per dose)Day 0 or Day 0 + 28OralVaxartNon-replicating adenovirus vector expressing viral antigens and dsRNA adjuvantPhase I (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,169,170]
Viral vector (non-replicating)13AdCOVID, 1–2 dosesDay 0 + NRINAltimmune, Inc.Adenovirus expressing the RBD of S proteinPhase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,171]
Viral vector (non-replicating)14COH04S1 (MVA-SARS-2-S)2 doses (1 × 107, 1 × 108, or 2.5 × 108 PFU per dose)Day 0 + 28IMCity of Hope Medical Center + National Cancer InstituteSynthetic MVA carrying small pieces of SARS-CoV-2 DNA (the chemical form of genes)Phase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,172]
Viral vector (non-replicating)15ChAdV68-S
ChAdV68-S-TCE
(Homologous and heterologous prime-boost schedule)
2–3 doses (5 × 1010 or 1 × 1011 viral particles of ChAdV68-S, 10 µg or 30 µg SEM)Day 0 + 28, or Day 0 + 56, or Day 0 + 112, or Day 0 + 56 + 112IMGritstone Oncology Chimpanzee Adenovirus serotype 68 (ChAd) and self-amplifying mRNA (SAM) vectors expressing either S protein alone, or S protein with additional T-cell epitopes (TCE)Phase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,173]
Viral vector (non-replicating)16SC-Ad6-11–2 dosesDay 0 or Day 0 + 21IMTetherex Pharmaceuticals CorporationAdenovirus vector vaccinePhase I (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,174]
Viral vector (non-replicating)17BBV1541–2 doses (1 × 1010 viral particles per dose)Day 0 or Day 0 + 28INBharat Biotech International LimitedS proteinPhase I (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,175]
Viral vector (replicating)18DelNS1-2019-nCoV-RBD-OPT12 doses (1 × 107 EID50 and 1 × 107.7 EID50)Day 0 + 28INUniversity of Hong Kong, Xiamen University + Beijing Wantai Biological PharmacyGenetically engineered live attenuated influenza virus vector expressing the RBD of S proteinPhase II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,176,177]
Viral vector (replicating)19rVSV-SARS-CoV-2-S Vaccine 2 doses (1 × 105, 1 × 106, 1 × 107, or 1 × 108 PFU/mL)Day 0 + 28IMInstitute for Biological Research cDNA vector encoding the sequence of the N, P, M, and L genes of the VSV genome, and SARS-CoV-2 S proteinPhase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,178]
Viral vector (replicating)20AV-COVID-191 dose (0.1, 0.33, or 1.0 mg)Day 0IMAivita Biomedical, Inc. + National Institute of Health Research and Development + Ministry of Health Republic of IndonesiaAutologous dendritic cells loaded with antigens from SARS-CoV-2 +/− GM-CSFPhase I–II (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,179]
Viral vector (replicating)21Covid-19/aAPC vaccine3 dosesDay 0 + 14 + 28SCShenzhen Geno-Immune Medical InstituteLentivirus vector system expressing viral minigenes to the artificial antigen-presenting cells (aAPCs)Phase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,180]
DNA based vaccine1nCov vaccine (ZyCoV-D)3 doses (1 or 2 mg)Day 0 + 28 + 56IDZydus CadilaS proteinPhase III (Not recruiting)Efficacy from clinical trials in India: 66.6%Not yet approved in any country[26,81,181,182]
DNA based vaccine2INO-4800+ electroporation 2 doses (1 mg)Day 0 + 28ID Inovio Pharmaceuticals + International Vaccine Institute + Advaccine Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.S1 and S2 subunits of SARS-CoV-2 S proteinPhase II–III (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,183,184]
DNA based vaccine3AG0301-COVID192 doses (2 mg)Day 0 + 14IMAnGes + Takara Bio + Osaka UniversityS proteinPhase II–III (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,185]
DNA based vaccine4GX-192 dosesDay 0 + 28IMGenexine ConsortiumS proteinPhase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,186]
DNA based vaccine5Covigenix VAX-001 2 dosesDay 0 + 14IMEntos Pharmaceuticals Inc. Full-length S proteinPhase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,187]
DNA based vaccine6GLS-53102 doses (0.6 or 1.2 mg)Day 0 + 56 or Day 0 + 84IDGeneOne Life Science, Inc.S protein and a second antigenic target of SARS-CoV-2Phase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,188,189]
DNA based vaccine7COVID-eVax2 doses (0.5, 1, or 2 mg)Day 0 + 28IMTakis + Rottapharm BiotechRBD of S proteinPhase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,190]
DNA based vaccine8CORVax 2 dosesDay 0 + 14IDProvidence Health and ServicesS protein +/− the combination of electroporated IL-12p70 plasmid Phase I (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,191]
DNA based vaccine9bacTRL1–2 doses Day 0 or Day 0 + 28OralSymvivo CorporationS proteinPhase I (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,192]
DNA based vaccine10COVIGEN (COVALIA)2 doses (0.8, 2, or 4 mg)Day 0 + 28IM or IDUniversity of Sydney, Bionet Co., Ltd.S proteinPhase I (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,193]
RNA vaccine1mRNA-12732 doses (100 μg)Day 0 + 28IMModerna + National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Full-length S protein with proline substitutionsPhase IV (Recruiting)Efficacy from clinical trials in the U.S.: 92.1% against symptomatic disease ≥14 d after 1 dose, 94.1% ≥ 14 d after 2 doses, and 100% against severe disease.
Real-world efficacy:
U.S.: 80% ≥ 14 d after 1 dose and 90% ≥ 14 d after 2 doses. 83% ≥ 14 d after 1 dose and 82% after 2 doses. 88.7% against infection ≥ 36 d after 1 dose.
Canada: 72% against infection after 1 dose and 94% after 2 doses.
Efficacy/ effectiveness against variants:
Qatar: 88.1% ≥ 14 d after 1 dose, 100% after 2 doses against Alpha variant. 61.3% ≥ 14 d after 1 dose, 96.4% after 2 doses against Betavariant.
Canada: 83% ≥ 14 d after 1 dose and 92% ≥ 7 d after 2 doses against symptomatic infection caused by Alpha variant. 77% ≥ 14 d after 1 dose against symptomatic infection caused by Beta or Gammavariants. 72% ≥ 14 d after 1 dose against symptomatic infection caused by Delta variant.
FDA EUAWHO EUL
Approved in 57 countries 9EMA approved
[26,73,88,92,94,110,137,145,194,195,196,197,198]
RNA vaccine2BNT162b2 (3 LNP-mRNAs), also known as “Comirnaty”2 doses (30 μg)Day 0 + 21IMPfizer/BioNTech + Fosun PharmaFull-length S protein with proline substitutionsPhase IV (Recruiting)Efficacy from clinical trials: 52.4% after 1 dose and 94.6% ≥ 7 d after 2 doses in adults.
Real-world efficacy:
England: 60–70% against infection after 1 dose, 85–90% after 2 doses in elderly (≥80 y).
72% against infection ≥21 d after 1 dose, and 86% ≥ 7 d after 2 doses.
91% against infection 15–28 d after 1 dose.
UK: 70% ≥ 21 d after 1 dose, 85% ≥ 7 d after 2 doses.
Denmark: 17% ≥ 14 d after 1 dose, 64–90% ≥ 7 d after 2 doses.
Scotland: 91% against hospitalization 28–34 d after 1 dose.
U.S.: 80% ≥ 14 d after 1 dose, 93% ≥ 14 d after 2 doses.
88.7% against infection ≥ 36 d after 1 dose.
Sweden: 42% against infection ≥ 14 d after 1 dose, 86% ≥ 7 d after 2 doses.
Canada: 59% ≥ 14 d after 1 dose and 91% after 2 doses.
Qatar: 39.4% against disease after 1 dose and 97.4% ≥ 14 d after 2 doses.
Efficacy/ effectiveness against variants:
England: 83.0% against hospitalization after 1 dose, 95.0% after 2 doses against Alpha variant.
94.0% against hospitalization after 1 dose, 96.0% after 2 doses against Deltavariant.
Canada: 89% ≥ 7 d after 2 doses against symptomatic infection caused by Alpha variant.
60% ≥ 14 d after 1 dose and 84% ≥ 7 d against symptomatic infection caused by Beta or Gammavariants. 56% ≥ 14 d after 1 dose and 87% ≥ 7 d against symptomatic infection caused by Delta variant.
Qatar: 29.5% after 1 dose and 89.5% ≥ 14 d after 2 doses against infection caused by Alpha variant.
16.9% after 1 dose and 75.0% after 2 doses against infection caused by Beta variant.
FDA EUA
WHO EUL
Approved in 93 countries 10
CARPHA EU recommendation
EMA approved
[26,73,89,92,93,110,141,142,145,196,197,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209]
RNA vaccine3CVnCoV (CureVac)2 doses (12 μg)Day 0 + 28IMCureVac AGLNP-encapsulated mRNA vaccine encoding the full-length, pre-fusion stabilized S proteinPhase III (Active, not recruiting)Efficacy from clinical trials conducted in 10 countries in Latin America and Europe: 47% against symptomatic disease across all age groups and 15 variants, 53% against any disease severity, 77% against moderate and severe disease.WHO EUL (Pending approval)
Not yet approved in any country
[26,110,210,211,212]
RNA vaccine4ARCoV or ARCoVax1 dose (15 μg)Day 0IMAcademy of Military Science (AMS), Walvax Biotechnology and Suzhou Abogen BiosciencesLNP-encapsulated mRNA vaccine encoding the RBD of S proteinPhase III (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,213,214]
RNA vaccine5mRNA-1273.2111 dose (50 μg)Day 0IMModernaTX, Inc.A multivalent booster candidate combining mRNA-1273 + mRNA-1273.351Phase II-III (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,215]
RNA vaccine6mRNA-1273.3511–2 doses (20 or 50 μg)Day 0, or Day 0 + 28, or Day 56 after 2nd dose of mRNA-1273IMModerna + NIAIDFull-length prefusion stabilized S protein of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 variantPhase II (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,216,217,218]
RNA vaccine7ARCT-0211–2 doses ± booster dose (5 or 7.5 μg)Day 0, or Day 0 + 28, or Day 0 + 28 ± 208 (booster)IMArcturus TherapeuticsS proteinPhase II (Two trials: one is recruiting, and the other is active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,219,220,221]
RNA vaccine8MRT55002 doses (15, 45, or 135 µg)Day 0 + 21IMSanofi Pasteur and Translate BioS proteinPhase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,222,223,224]
RNA vaccine9DS-5670a2 doses (10, 30, 60 or 100 µg)Day 0 + 21IMDaiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.NRPhase I–II (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,225,226]
RNA vaccine10EXG-50031 doseDay 0IDElixirgen Therapeutics, IncTemperature-sensitive ssRNA vaccine expressing the RBD of S proteinPhase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,227]
RNA vaccine11LNP-nCoVsaRNA (COVAC1)2 doses (0.1–10.0 µg)NDIMImperial College LondonS protein Phase I (No longer recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,228,229]
RNA vaccine12ChulaCov19 mRNA vaccine2 doses (10, 25, 50, or 100 µg)Day 0 + 21IMChulalongkorn UniversityS proteinPhase I (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,230,231]
RNA vaccine13PTX-COVID19-B2 doses (16, 40, or 100 μg)Day 0 + 28IMProvidence TherapeuticsFull-length membrane-anchored S proteinPhase I (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,232,233]
RNA vaccine14CoV2 SAM (LNP)2 doses (1.0 μg)Day 0 + 30IMGSKS proteinPhase I (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,234]
RNA vaccine15HDT-3012 doses (1, 5, or 25 μg)Day 0 + 28IMSENAI CIMATECFull-length S proteinPhase I (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,235]
RNA vaccine16mRNA-12831–2 doses (10, 30, or 100 μg)Day 0 or Day 0 + 28IMModernaTX, Inc.RBD and NTD of S proteinPhase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,236,237]
RNA vaccine17SW-01232 dosesNRIMShanghai East Hospital + Stemirna TherapeuticsNRPhase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,238,239]
RNA vaccine18LNP-nCOV saRNA-02 (COVAC-Uganda)2 doses (5.0 µg)Day 0 + 28IMMRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research UnitS proteinPhase I (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,240]
Protein subunit1NVX-CoV23732 doses (5 µg)Day 0 + 21IMNovavaxS protein with Matrix-M adjuvantPhase III (Recruiting)Efficacy from clinical trials:
UK: 89.7% against symptomatic disease ≥7 d after 2 doses.
Real-world efficacy:
U.S.: 100% against mild and severe disease.
Efficacy/effectiveness against variants:
UK: 86.2% against Alpha variant, 96.4% against non-B.1.1.7 variants.
South Africa: 51.0% against Beta variant after 2 doses. 85.6% against symptomatic disease caused by Alpha variant. 60% against any disease severity in predominantly circulating Beta variant.
U.S.: 93% against Alpha, Beta, and other VOCs/ VOIs.
WHO EUL (Approval pending)
Not yet approved in any country
[26,102,103,110,241,242,243]
Protein subunit2ZF2001 (Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 vaccine)3 doses (25 µg)Day 0 + 30 + 93IMAnhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical + Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of SciencesRBD-Dimer with alum adjuvantPhase III (Recruiting)NRChina (EUA), Uzbekistan[26,244,245]
Protein subunit3VAT000082 dosesDay 0 + 21IMSanofi Pasteur + GSKMonovalent and bivalent S protein with adjuvantPhase III (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,246,247]
Protein subunit4FINLAY-FR-22 doses (25 μg) + booster dose (FINLAY-FR-1A, 50 μg))Day 0 + 28
Day 56 (booster dose)
IMInstituto Finlay de Vacunas FINLAY-FR-2: chemically conjugated RBD to tetanus toxoid plus adjuvant
FINLAY-FR-1A: dimeric RBD + alum adjuvant
Phase III (Pending)62%Not yet approved in any country[26,248,249,250]
Protein subunit5Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Sf9 Cell)3 doses Day 0 + 28 + 42IMWest China Hospital + Sichuan UniversityRBD with alum adjuvantPhase III (Enrolling by invitation)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,251]
Protein subunit6EpiVacCorona2 dosesDay 0 + 21IMFederal Budgetary Research Institution State Research Center of Virology and BiotechnologyPeptide antigens of SARS-CoV-2 proteins with alum adjuvantPhase III (Active, not recruiting)Efficacy from clinical trials: 100%Russia, Turkmenistan[26,252,253]
Protein subunit7CIGB-663 doses (50 µg RBD + 0.3 mg aluminum hydroxide)Day 0 + 14 + 28 or Day 0 + 28 + 56IMCenter for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB) RBD with aluminum hydroxide adjuvantPhase III (Pending)Efficacy from clinical trials: 91.6%Not yet approved in any country[26,254,255]
Protein subunit8NanoCovax2 doses (25 µg)Day 0 + 28IMNanogen Pharmaceutical BiotechnologyRecombinant S protein with alum adjuvantPhase III (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,256]
Protein subunit9SCB-20192 doses (30 μg)Day 0 + 21IMClover Biopharmaceuticals Inc. + GSK + DynavaxTrimeric S protein with CpG 1018 and Alum adjuvantsPhase II–III (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,257,258,259]
Protein subunit10UB-6122 doses (100 µg)Day 0 + 28IMVaxxinity, Inc. + Diagnósticos da América S/A (DASA)RBD of S proteinPhase II–III (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,260]
Protein subunit11FINLAY-FR-12 doses (10 or 20 μg)Day 0 + 28IMInstituto Finlay de Vacunas RBD with adjuvantPhase II (Pending)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,261]
Protein subunit12COVAX-192 doses (25 μg)Day 0 + 21IMVaxine Pty Ltd. + CinnaGen Co.Recombinant S protein with Advax-CpG adjuvantPhase II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,262]
Protein subunit13MVC-COV19012 doses (5, 15, or 25 μg)Day 0 + 28IMMedigen Vaccine Biologics + Dynavax + NIAIDRecombinant S protein with CpG 1018 and alum adjuvantsPhase II (Active, not recruiting for adults, recruiting for elderly)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,263,264,265]
Protein subunit14Razi Cov Pars3 dosesDay 0 + 21 (IM) + 51 (IN)IM and INRazi Vaccine and Serum Research InstituteRecombinant S proteinPhase II (Complete)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,266]
Protein subunit15 V-012 doses (10 or 25 μg)Day 0 + 21IMGuangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention/ Gaozhou Center for Disease Control and PreventionRecombinant S proteinPhase II (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,267]
Protein subunit16CIGB-669 3 doses (50 µg RBD + 40 µg AgnHB)Day 0 + 14 + 28 or Day 0 + 28 + 56INCenter for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB)Recombinant RBD with AgnHBPhase I–II (Pending)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,268]
Protein subunit17KBP-COVID-19 2 doses (15 μg in phase I, 45 μg in phase II)Day 0 + 21IMKentucky Bioprocessing Inc.RBD of S proteinPhase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,269,270]
Protein subunit18BECOV22 dosesDay 0 + 28IMBiological E. Limited Recombinant RBDPhase I–II (Closed)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,271]
Protein subunit19S-2680192 dosesDay 0 + 21IMShionogiRecombinant S proteinPhase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,272]
Protein subunit20AKS-4521–2 doses (22.5, 45, or 90 µg)NRSC or IMUniversity Medical Center Groningen + Akston Biosciences Inc.RBD-Fc fusion proteinPhase I–II (Enrolling by invitation)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,273]
Protein subunit21COVAC-1 and COVAC-22 doses (25, 50, or 100 µg)Day 0 + 28IMUniversity of SaskatchewanS1 protein with SWE adjuvantPhase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,274]
Protein subunit22GBP5102 doses (10, or 25 µg)Day 0 + 28IMSK Bioscience Co., Ltd. And CEPIRecombinant RBD with AS03 aluminum hydroxide adjuvantPhase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,275]
Protein subunit23QazCoVac-P1–2 dosesDay 0 + 21IMResearch Institute for Biological Safety Problems Phase I–II (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,276]
Protein subunit24EuCorVac-192 dosesDay 0 + 21IMPOP Biotechnologies and EuBiologics Co., LtdRecombinant S protein with an adjuvantPhase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,277]
Protein subunit25Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (CHO cell)3 dosesDay 0 + 30 + 60IMNational Vaccine and Serum Institute, ChinaRecombinant SARS-CoV-2Phase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,278]
Protein subunit26SARS-CoV-2 Sclamp vaccine 2 doses (5, 15, or 45 μg)Day 0 + 28IMUniversity of Queensland + Syneos Health + CEPIRecombinant S protein with MF59 adjuvantPhase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,279,280,281]
Protein subunit27IMP CoVac-11 dose (500 µL)Day 0SCUniversity Hospital TuebingenSARS-CoV-2 HLA-DR peptidesPhase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,282]
Protein subunit28AdimrSC-2fNRNRNRAdimmune Corporation Recombinant RBD with alum adjuvant Phase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,283]
Protein subunit29NBP20012 doses (30 or 50 μg)Day 0 + 28IMSK Bioscience Co., Ltd.Recombinant RBD protein with alum adjuvantPhase I (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,284]
Protein subunit30ReCOV2 doses (20 or 40 μg)Day 0 + 21IMJiangsu Rec-BiotechnologyRecombinant two-component S and RBD proteinPhase I (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,285]
Protein subunit31Spike-Ferritin-Nanoparticle (SpFN)2–3 doses (25 or 50 μg)Day 0 + 28 + 180IMWalter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR)S proteins with a liposomal formulation QS21 (ALFQ) adjuvantPhase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,286,287,288]
Protein subunit32CoVepiT 1–2 dosesDay 0 or Day 0 + 21SCOSE ImmunotherapeuticsTarget 11 viral protein (S, M, N, and several non-structural proteins)Phase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,289]
Protein subunit33CoV2-OGEN11–2 doses (50, 100, or 200 μg)Day 0 or Day 0 + 14OralVaxFormRecombinant RBD proteinPhase I (Not yet recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,290]
Virus-like particle1CoVLP2 doses (3.75 µg)Day 0 + 21IMMedicago Inc.Trimeric S protein with AS03 adjuvantPhase II–III (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,291,292]
Virus-like particle2RBD SARS-CoV-2 HBsAg VLP2 doses (5 or 25 µg)Day 0 + 28IMSerum Institute of India + Accelagen Pty + SpyBiotechRBD conjugated to the hepatitis B surface antigenPhase I–II (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,293]
Virus-like particle3VBI-2902a2 doses (5 or 10 μg)Day 0 + 28IMVBI Vaccines Inc.Enveloped S glycoprotein with aluminum phosphate adjuvantPhase I–II (Active, not recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,294]
Virus-like particle4SARS-CoV-2 VLP Vaccine2 dosesNRSCThe Scientific and Technological Research Council of TurkeySARS-CoV-2 VLP adjuvanted with alum and CpG ODN-K3Phase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,295]
Virus-like particle5ABNCoV2 2 dosesDay 0 + 28IMRadboud Universitycapsid virus-like particle (cVLP) +/− adjuvant MF59Phase I (Recruiting)NRNot yet approved in any country[26,296]
Abbreviations: IM: Intramuscular, IN: Intranasal, IV: Intravascular, SC: Subcutaneous, ID: Intradermal, SL: Sublingual, NR: Not reported, d: days, FDA: Food and Drug Administration, WHO: World Health Organization, EUA: Emergency Use Authorization, EUL: Emergency Use Listing, ART: Africa Regulatory Taskforce, CRS: Caribbean Regulatory System, EMA: European Medicines Agency, EU: Equivalent units, IU: Infectious unit, PFU: Plaque-forming unit, S: Spike, RBD: Receptor-binding domain, N: nucleocapsid, M: membrane, NTD: N-terminal domain, Al(OH)3: aluminum hydroxide, Algel-IMDG: chemosorbed imidazoquinoline onto aluminum hydroxide gel, CpG 1018: cytosine phosphoguanine 1018, CpG ODN: CpG oligodeoxynucleotide, NVD: Newcastle Disease Virus, RSV: Respiratory syncytial virus, MVA: Modified vaccinia virus Ankara, VSV: Vesicular stomatitis virus, GM-CSF: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, ssRNA: Self-amplifying ribonucleic acid, LNP: Lipid nanoparticles, AgnHBL antigen of Hepatitis B, VOCs: variants of concern, VOIs: variants of interest.
* Efficacy against COVID-19 varies by age and time after vaccinations.1 Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Benin, Brazil, Cambodia, Chile, China, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Georgia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Mexico, Nepal, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Philippines, South Africa, Tajikistan, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, Uruguay, and Zimbabwe. 2 Angola, Argentina, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Cameroon, China, Comoros, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Guyana, Hungary, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Lebanon, Maldives, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, North Macedonia, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Republic of the Congo, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, United Arab Emirates, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela), Vietnam, and Zimbabwe. 3 Guyana, India, Iran, Mauritius, Mexico, Nepal, Paraguay, Philippines, and Zimbabwe. 4 Albania, Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bermuda, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Canada, Central African Republic, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Estonia, Eswatini, Fiji, Finland, France, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Kosovo, Kuwait, Latvia, Lesotho, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Nauru, Netherlands, Niger, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Rwanda, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Sudan, Spain, Sudan, Sweden, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Viet Nam, Yemen, and Zambia. 5 Argentina, Chile, China, Ecuador, Hungary, Malaysia, Mexico, and Pakistan. 6 Austria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Faroe Islands, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kuwait, Latvia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Romania, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Tunisia, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, and Zambia. 7 Albania, Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bolivia, Brazil, Cameroon, Djibouti, Ecuador, Egypt, Gabon, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, Honduras, Hungary, India, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Maldives, Mali, Mauritius, Mexico, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Nicaragua, North Macedonia, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Philippines, Republic of Moldova, Republic of the Congo, Russian Federation, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, Serbia, Seychelles, Slovakia, Sri Lanka, Syrian Arab Republic, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Vietnam, West Bank, and Zimbabwe. 8 Afghanistan, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Cabo Verde, Canada, Côte d’Ivoire, Dominica, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Grenada, Honduras, Hungary, India, Jamaica, Lebanon, Maldives, Morocco, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Seychelles, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Suriname, The Bahamas, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Ukraine. 9 Austria, Bangladesh, Belgium, Botswana, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Faroe Islands, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Greenland, Guatemala, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Italy, Kuwait, Latvia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Maldives, Mongolia, Netherlands, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Romania, Rwanda, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Seychelles, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Viet Nam, and West Bank. 10 Albania, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Bermuda, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Cabo Verde, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Estonia, Faroe Islands, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Greenland, Hong Kong, Hungary, Iceland, Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kuwait, Latvia, Lebanon, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Rwanda, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Uruguay, Vatican, Viet Nam, and West Bank.

3. Conclusions

With the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, safe and effective vaccines could be the major aid in retrenching this outbreak and probably the best bet to return us to ‘normal life’. The impulse of an accelerated vaccine development process, though needed, is faced with a broad spectrum of challenges that necessitates collective strives from both the public and the private sectors to fully understand the potential utility of these vaccines not only for overcoming the current pandemic but also for preventing future waves.

Author Contributions

H.T.A.-J., M.N.A., S.A. and L.K. conceptualized the review. H.T.A.-J., M.N.A. and S.A. wrote the first draft of the review. H.T.A.-J., H.N., A.Q. and L.K. wrote the second draft, edited, and revised the final version of the review. H.T.A.-J. created Figure 1 and Figure 2 and Table 1. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This review received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data used in the review were retrieved from the World Health Organization (WHO) vaccine tracker and landscape website (https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines) (accessed on 15 June 2021) and/or other publicly available resources as detailed through in-text citation and the references section of the review. Figures were created with BioRender.com.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 1 July 2020).
  2. Mariano, G.; Farthing, R.J.; Lale-Farjat, S.L.M.; Bergeron, J.R.C. Structural Characterization of SARS-CoV-2: Where We Are, and Where We Need to Be. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020, 7, 605236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Naqvi, A.A.T.; Fatima, K.; Mohammad, T.; Fatima, U.; Singh, I.K.; Singh, A.; Atif, S.M.; Hariprasad, G.; Hasan, G.M.; Hassan, M.I. Insights into SARS-CoV-2 genome, structure, evolution, pathogenesis and therapies: Structural genomics approach. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2020, 1866, 165878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. V’kovski, P.; Kratzel, A.; Steiner, S.; Stalder, H.; Thiel, V. Coronavirus biology and replication: Implications for SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tortorici, M.A.; Veesler, D. Structural insights into coronavirus entry. Adv. Virus Res. 2019, 105, 93–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hu, T.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, M.; Zhuang, Q.; Xu, L.; He, Q. A comparison of COVID-19, SARS and MERS. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, Z.; Harrich, D.; Li, Z.; Hu, D.; Li, D. The unique features of SARS-CoV-2 transmission: Comparison with SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza virus. Rev. Med. Virol. 2021, 31, e2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Petersen, E.; Koopmans, M.; Go, U.; Hamer, D.H.; Petrosillo, N.; Castelli, F.; Storgaard, M.; Al Khalili, S.; Simonsen, L. Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with SARS-CoV and influenza pandemics. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, e238–e244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cyprian, F.; Sohail, M.U.; Abdelhafez, I.; Salman, S.; Attique, Z.; Kamareddine, L.; Al-Asmakh, M. SARS-CoV-2 and immune-microbiome interactions: Lessons from respiratory viral infections. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 105, 540–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Güner, R.; Hasanoğlu, I.; Aktaş, F. COVID-19: Prevention and control measures in community. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 50, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fontanet, A.; Cauchemez, S. COVID-19 herd immunity: Where are we? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 583–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Spellberg, B.; Nielsen, T.B.; Casadevall, A. Antibodies, Immunity, and COVID-19. JAMA Intern. Med. 2021, 181, 460–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sharma, O.; Sultan, A.A.; Ding, H.; Triggle, C.R. A Review of the Progress and Challenges of Developing a Vaccine for COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 585354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jung, F.; Krieger, V.; Hufert, F.; Küpper, J.-H. Herd immunity or suppression strategy to combat COVID-19. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2020, 75, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Randolph, H.E.; Barreiro, L.B. Herd Immunity: Understanding COVID-19. Immunity 2020, 52, 737–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Krammer, F. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development. Nature 2020, 586, 516–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. National Institutes of Health. Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV). Available online: https://www.nih.gov/research-training/medical-research-initiatives/activ#:~:text=On%20April%2017%2C%202020%20the,most%20promising%20treatments%20and%20vaccines (accessed on 17 April 2020).
  18. Forni, G.; Mantovani, A.; Forni, G.; Mantovani, A.; Moretta, L.; Rappuoli, R.; Rezza, G.; Bagnasco, A.; Barsacchi, G.; Bussolati, G.; et al. COVID-19 vaccines: Where we stand and challenges ahead. Cell Death Differ. 2021, 28, 626–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Martin, J.E.; Louder, M.K.; Holman, L.A.; Gordon, I.J.; Enama, M.E.; Larkin, B.D.; Andrews, C.A.; Vogel, L.; Koup, R.A.; Roederer, M.; et al. A SARS DNA vaccine induces neutralizing antibody and cellular immune responses in healthy adults in a Phase I clinical trial. Vaccine 2008, 26, 6338–6343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lin, J.T.; Zhang, J.S.; Su, N.; Xu, J.G.; Wang, N.; Chen, J.T.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.X.; Gao, H.; Jia, Y.P.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity from a phase I trial of inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccine. Antivir. Ther. 2007, 12, 1107–1113. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, Y.-D.; Chi, W.-Y.; Su, J.-H.; Ferrall, L.; Hung, C.-F.; Wu, T.C. Coronavirus vaccine development: From SARS and MERS to COVID-19. J. Biomed. Sci. 2020, 27, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.; Peng, Y.; Xu, H.; Cui, Z.; Williams, R.O., 3rd. The COVID-19 Vaccine Race: Challenges and Opportunities in Vaccine Formulation. AAPS PharmSciTech 2020, 21, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lurie, N.; Saville, M.; Hatchett, R.; Halton, J. Developing Covid-19 Vaccines at Pandemic Speed. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1969–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Clem, A.S. Fundamentals of vaccine immunology. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 2011, 3, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Poland, G.A.; Ovsyannikova, I.G.; Crooke, S.N.; Kennedy, R.B. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Development: Current Status. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020, 95, 2172–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. WHO. Draft Landscape of COVID-19 Candidate Vaccines. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines (accessed on 29 June 2021).
  27. Murdin, A.D.; Barreto, L.; Plotkin, S. Inactivated poliovirus vaccine: Past and present experience. Vaccine 1996, 14, 735–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vellozzi, C.; Burwen, D.R.; Dobardzic, A.; Ball, R.; Walton, K.; Haber, P. Safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines in adults: Background for pandemic influenza vaccine safety monitoring. Vaccine 2009, 27, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Gao, Q.; Bao, L.; Mao, H.; Wang, L.; Xu, K.; Yang, M.; Li, Y.; Zhu, L.; Wang, N.; Lv, Z.; et al. Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2. Science 2020, 369, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Briggs, D.J.; Nagarajan, T.; Rupprecht, C.E. Chapter 13—Rabies Vaccines. In Rabies, 3rd ed.; Jackson, A.C., Ed.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 497–526. [Google Scholar]
  31. André, F.; Van Damme, P.; Safary, A.; Banatvala, J. Inactivated hepatitis A vaccine: Immunogenicity, efficacy, safety and review of official recommendations for use. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2002, 1, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Graham, R.L.; Donaldson, E.F.; Baric, R.S. A decade after SARS: Strategies for controlling emerging coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 836–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Sanders, B.; Koldijk, M.; Schuitemaker, H. Inactivated Viral Vaccines. In Vaccine Analysis: Strategies, Principles, and Control; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 45–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, B.; Deng, W.; Quan, Y.; Wang, W.; Xu, W.; Zhao, Y.; Li, N.; Zhang, J.; et al. Development of an Inactivated Vaccine Candidate, BBIBP-CorV, with Potent Protection against SARS-CoV-2. Cell 2020, 182, 713–721.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Burrell, C.J.; Howard, C.R.; Murphy, F.A. Chapter 11—Vaccines and Vaccination. In Fenner and White’s Medical Virology, 5th ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2017; pp. 155–167. [Google Scholar]
  36. NIH. A Study to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of the Coronavac Vaccine Against COVID-19; NIH: Bethseda, MD, USA, 2021. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04756830?term=NCT04756830&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 18 February 2021).
  37. Zhang, Y.; Zeng, G.; Pan, H.; Li, C.; Hu, Y.; Chu, K.; Han, W.; Chen, Z.; Tang, R.; Yin, W.; et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18–59 years: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Palacios, R.; Batista, A.P.; Albuquerque, C.S.N.; Patiño, E.G.; Santos, J.D.P.; Conde, M.T.R.P.; Piorelli, R.D.; Júnior, L.C.P.; Raboni, S.M.; Ramos, F.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of a COVID-19 Inactivated Vaccine in Healthcare Professionals in Brazil: The PROFISCOV Study; SSRN: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  39. Xia, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Yang, Y.; Gao, G.F.; Tan, W.; Wu, G.; Xu, M.; Lou, Z.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBIBP-CorV: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Al Kaabi, N.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, S.; Yang, Y.; Al Qahtani, M.M.; Abdulrazzaq, N.; Al Nusair, M.; Hassany, M.; Jawad, J.S.; Abdalla, J.; et al. Effect of 2 Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines on Symptomatic COVID-19 Infection in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2021, 326, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. NIH. A Immuno-bridging and Immunization Schedules Study of COVID-19 Vaccine (Vero Cell), Inactivated (COVID-19). 2021. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04863638 (accessed on 29 June 2021).
  42. Nathanson, N.; Langmuir, A.D. The cutter incident. poliomyelitis following formaldehyde- inactivated poliovirus vaccination in the united states during the spring of 1955. II. Relationship of poliomyelitis to cutter vaccine. Am. J. Hyg. 1963, 78, 29–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Roper, R.L.; Rehm, K.E. SARS vaccines: Where are we? Expert Rev. Vaccines 2009, 8, 887–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Agrawal, A.S.; Tao, X.; Algaissi, A.; Garron, T.; Narayanan, K.; Peng, B.H.; Couch, R.B.; Tseng, C.T. Immunization with inactivated Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus vaccine leads to lung immunopathology on challenge with live virus. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2016, 12, 2351–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bolles, M.; Deming, D.; Long, K.; Agnihothram, S.; Whitmore, A.; Ferris, M.; Funkhouser, W.; Gralinski, L.; Totura, A.; Heise, M.; et al. A double-inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccine provides incomplete protection in mice and induces increased eosinophilic proinflammatory pulmonary response upon challenge. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 12201–12215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Tseng, C.-T.; Sbrana, E.; Iwata-Yoshikawa, N.; Newman, P.C.; Garron, T.; Atmar, R.L.; Peters, C.J.; Couch, R.B. Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Castilow, E.M.; Olson, M.R.; Varga, S.M. Understanding respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine-enhanced disease. Immunol. Res. 2007, 39, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kapikian, A.Z.; Mitchell, R.H.; Chanock, R.M.; Shvedoff, R.A.; Stewart, C.E. An epidemiologic study of altered clinical reactivity to respiratory syncytial (RS) virus infection in children previously vaccinated with an inactivated RS virus vaccine. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1969, 89, 405–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Murphy, B.R.; Walsh, E.E. Formalin-inactivated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine induces antibodies to the fusion glycoprotein that are deficient in fusion-inhibiting activity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1988, 26, 1595–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Vignuzzi, M.; Wendt, E.; Andino, R. Engineering attenuated virus vaccines by controlling replication fidelity. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mak, T.W.; Saunders, M.E. 23—Vaccines and Clinical Immunization. In The Immune Response; Mak, T.W., Saunders, M.E., Eds.; Academic Press: Burlington, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 695–749. [Google Scholar]
  52. Tiboni, M.; Casettari, L.; Illum, L. Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines? Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 603, 120686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Groenke, N.; Trimpert, J.; Merz, S.; Conradie, A.M.; Wyler, E.; Zhang, H.; Hazapis, O.-G.; Rausch, S.; Landthaler, M.; Osterrieder, N.; et al. Mechanism of Virus Attenuation by Codon Pair Deoptimization. Cell Rep. 2020, 31, 107586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Coleman, J.R.; Papamichail, D.; Skiena, S.; Futcher, B.; Wimmer, E.; Mueller, S. Virus Attenuation by Genome-Scale Changes in Codon Pair Bias. Science 2008, 320, 1784–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. News, G.E.B. Meissa Vaccines—MV-014-212. Available online: https://www.genengnews.com/covid-19-candidates/meissa-vaccines-mv-014-212/ (accessed on 30 June 2021).
  56. Mueller, S.; Stauft, C.B.; Kalkeri, R.; Koidei, F.; Kushnir, A.; Tasker, S.; Coleman, J.R. A codon-pair deoptimized live-attenuated vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus is immunogenic and efficacious in non-human primates. Vaccine 2020, 38, 2943–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dong, Y.; Dai, T.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, M.; Zhou, F. A systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yadav, D.K.; Yadav, N.; Khurana, S.M.P. Chapter 26—Vaccines: Present Status and Applications. In Animal Biotechnology; Verma, A.S., Singh, A., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2014; pp. 491–508. [Google Scholar]
  59. WHO. MODULE 2 Types of Vaccine and Adverse Reactions. Available online: https://vaccine-safety-training.org/live-attenuated-vaccines.html (accessed on 14 February 2021).
  60. Levin, M.J.; Song, L.-Y.; Fenton, T.; Nachman, S.; Patterson, J.; Walker, R.; Kemble, G.; Allende, M.; Hultquist, M.; Yi, T.; et al. Shedding of live vaccine virus, comparative safety, and influenza-specific antibody responses after administration of live attenuated and inactivated trivalent influenza vaccines to HIV-infected children. Vaccine 2008, 26, 4210–4217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Dudek, T.; Knipe, D.M. Replication-defective viruses as vaccines and vaccine vectors. Virology 2006, 344, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Robert-Guroff, M. Replicating and non-replicating viral vectors for vaccine development. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2007, 18, 546–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Henao-Restrepo, A.M.; Camacho, A.; Longini, I.M.; Watson, C.H.; Edmunds, W.J.; Egger, M.; Carroll, M.W.; Dean, N.E.; Diatta, I.; Doumbia, M.; et al. Efficacy and effectiveness of an rVSV-vectored vaccine in preventing Ebola virus disease: Final results from the Guinea ring vaccination, open-label, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2017, 389, 505–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Ura, T.; Okuda, K.; Shimada, M. Developments in Viral Vector-Based Vaccines. Vaccines 2014, 2, 624–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Van Riel, D.; de Wit, E. Next-generation vaccine platforms for COVID-19. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19, 810–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gao, W.; Tamin, A.; Soloff, A.; D’Aiuto, L.; Nwanegbo, E.; Robbins, P.D.; Bellini, W.J.; Barratt-Boyes, S.; Gambotto, A. Effects of a SARS-associated coronavirus vaccine in monkeys. Lancet 2003, 362, 1895–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Folegatti, P.M.; Ewer, K.J.; Aley, P.K.; Angus, B.; Becker, S.; Belij-Rammerstorfer, S.; Bellamy, D.; Bibi, S.; Bittaye, M.; Clutterbuck, E.A.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: A preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2020, 396, 467–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhu, F.C.; Li, Y.H.; Guan, X.H.; Hou, L.H.; Wang, W.J.; Li, J.X.; Wu, S.P.; Wang, B.S.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine: A dose-escalation, open-label, non-randomised, first-in-human trial. Lancet 2020, 395, 1845–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sadoff, J.; Gray, G.; Vandebosch, A.; Cárdenas, V.; Shukarev, G.; Grinsztejn, B.; Goepfert, P.A.; Truyers, C.; Fennema, H.; Spiessens, B.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of Single-Dose Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine against Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 2187–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jones, I.; Roy, P. Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine candidate appears safe and effective. Lancet 2021, 397, 642–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/janssen-covid-19-vaccine (accessed on 30 June 2021).
  72. Madhi, S.A.; Baillie, V.; Cutland, C.L.; Voysey, M.; Koen, A.L.; Fairlie, L.; Padayachee, S.D.; Dheda, K.; Barnabas, S.L.; Bhorat, Q.E.; et al. Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 1885–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nasreen, S.; He, S.; Chung, H.; Brown, K.A.; Gubbay, J.B.; Buchan, S.A.; Wilson, S.E.; Sundaram, M.E.; Fell, D.B.; Chen, B.; et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against variants of concern, Canada. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Emary, K.R.W.; Golubchik, T.; Aley, P.K.; Ariani, C.V.; Angus, B.; Bibi, S.; Blane, B.; Bonsall, D.; Cicconi, P.; Charlton, S.; et al. Efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/01 (B.1.1.7): An exploratory analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2021, 397, 1351–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Barouch, D.H.; Kik, S.V.; Weverling, G.J.; Dilan, R.; King, S.L.; Maxfield, L.F.; Clark, S.; Ng’ang’a, D.; Brandariz, K.L.; Abbink, P.; et al. International seroepidemiology of adenovirus serotypes 5, 26, 35, and 48 in pediatric and adult populations. Vaccine 2011, 29, 5203–5209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Dolzhikova, I.V.; Zubkova, O.V.; Tukhvatulin, A.I.; Dzharullaeva, A.S.; Tukhvatulina, N.M.; Shcheblyakov, D.V.; Shmarov, M.M.; Tokarskaya, E.A.; Simakova, Y.V.; Egorova, D.A.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of GamEvac-Combi, a heterologous VSV- and Ad5-vectored Ebola vaccine: An open phase I/II trial in healthy adults in Russia. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2017, 13, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Restifo, N.P.; Ying, H.; Hwang, L.; Leitner, W.W. The promise of nucleic acid vaccines. Gene Ther. 2000, 7, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Pardi, N.; Hogan, M.J.; Porter, F.W.; Weissman, D. mRNA vaccines—A new era in vaccinology. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018, 17, 261–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Wang, F.; Kream, R.M.; Stefano, G.B. An Evidence Based Perspective on mRNA-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Development. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020, 26, e924700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Reichmuth, A.M.; Oberli, M.A.; Jaklenec, A.; Langer, R.; Blankschtein, D. mRNA vaccine delivery using lipid nanoparticles. Ther. Deliv. 2016, 7, 319–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Dey, A.; Chozhavel Rajanathan, T.M.; Chandra, H.; Pericherla, H.P.R.; Kumar, S.; Choonia, H.S.; Bajpai, M.; Singh, A.K.; Sinha, A.; Saini, G.; et al. Immunogenic Potential of DNA Vaccine candidate, ZyCoV-D against SARS-CoV-2 in Animal Models. bioRxiv 2021, 30, 4108–4116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hobernik, D.; Bros, M. DNA Vaccines-How Far From Clinical Use? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Wolff, J.A.; Ludtke, J.J.; Acsadi, G.; Williams, P.; Jani, A. Long-term persistence of plasmid DNA and foreign gone expression in mouse muscle. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1992, 1, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, Z.; Troilo, P.; Wang, X.; Griffiths, T.; Pacchione, S.; Barnum, A.; Harper, L.; Pauley, C.; Niu, Z.; Denisova, L. Detection of integration of plasmid DNA into host genomic DNA following intramuscular injection and electroporation. Gene Ther. 2004, 11, 711–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Manam, S.; Ledwith, B.J.; Barnum, A.B.; Troilo, P.J.; Pauley, C.J.; Harper, L.B.; Griffiths II, T.G.; Niu, Z.; Denisova, L.; Follmer, T.T. Plasmid DNA vaccines: Tissue distribution and effects of DNA sequence, adjuvants and delivery method on integration into host DNA. Intervirology 2000, 43, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine (accessed on 30 June 2021).
  87. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/moderna-covid-19-vaccine (accessed on 30 June 2021).
  88. Baden, L.R.; El Sahly, H.M.; Essink, B.; Kotloff, K.; Frey, S.; Novak, R.; Diemert, D.; Spector, S.A.; Rouphael, N.; Creech, C.B.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 384, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Skowronski, D.M.; de Serres, G. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 1576–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Conversation, T. 4 Things about mRNA COVID Vaccines Researchers Still Want to Find out. 2021. Available online: https://theconversation.com/4-things-about-mrna-covid-vaccines-researchers-still-want-to-find-out-154160 (accessed on 3 July 2021).
  91. Xie, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Zou, J.; Fontes-Garfias, C.R.; Xia, H.; Swanson, K.A.; Cutler, M.; Cooper, D.; et al. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 spike 69/70 deletion, E484K and N501Y variants by BNT162b2 vaccine-elicited sera. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 620–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Abu-Raddad, L.J.; Chemaitelly, H.; Butt, A.A. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 Variants. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 187–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. PHE. Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines against Hospital Admission with the Delta (B.1.617.2) Variant. Available online: https://khub.net/web/phe-national/public-library/-/document_library/v2WsRK3ZlEig/view_file/479607329?_com_liferay_document_library_web_portlet_DLPortlet_INSTANCE_v2WsRK3ZlEig_redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fkhub.net%3A443%2Fweb%2Fphe-national%2Fpublic-library%2F-%2Fdocument_library%2Fv2WsRK3ZlEig%2Fview%2F479607266 (accessed on 14 June 2021).
  94. Chemaitelly, H.; Yassine, H.M.; Benslimane, F.M.; Al Khatib, H.A.; Tang, P.; Hasan, M.R.; Malek, J.A.; Coyle, P.; Ayoub, H.H.; Al Kanaani, Z.; et al. mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants and severe COVID-19 disease in Qatar. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1614–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zakhartchouk, A.N.; Liu, Q.; Petric, M.; Babiuk, L.A. Augmentation of immune responses to SARS coronavirus by a combination of DNA and whole killed virus vaccines. Vaccine 2005, 23, 4385–4391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Du, L.; He, Y.; Jiang, S.; Zheng, B.-J. Development of subunit vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome. Drugs Today 2008, 44, 63–74. [Google Scholar]
  97. Enjuanes, L.; Zuñiga, S.; Castaño-Rodriguez, C.; Gutierrez-Alvarez, J.; Canton, J.; Sola, I. Molecular Basis of Coronavirus Virulence and Vaccine Development. Adv. Virus Res. 2016, 96, 245–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lidder, P.; Sonnino, A. Chapter 1—Biotechnologies for the Management of Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. In Advances in Genetics; Goodwin, S.F., Friedmann, T., Dunlap, J.C., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012; Volume 78, pp. 1–167. [Google Scholar]
  99. WHO. WHO Vaccine Safety Basics. Available online: https://vaccine-safety-training.org/subunit-vaccines.html (accessed on 30 June 2021).
  100. Lan, J.; Yao, Y.; Deng, Y.; Chen, H.; Lu, G.; Wang, W.; Bao, L.; Deng, W.; Wei, Q.; Gao, G.F.; et al. Recombinant Receptor Binding Domain Protein Induces Partial Protective Immunity in Rhesus Macaques Against Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Challenge. EBioMedicine 2015, 2, 1438–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Bisht, H.; Roberts, A.; Vogel, L.; Subbarao, K.; Moss, B. Neutralizing antibody and protective immunity to SARS coronavirus infection of mice induced by a soluble recombinant polypeptide containing an N-terminal segment of the spike glycoprotein. Virology 2005, 334, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Heath, P.T.; Galiza, E.P.; Baxter, D.N.; Boffito, M.; Browne, D.; Burns, F.; Chadwick, D.R.; Clark, R.; Cosgrove, C.; Galloway, J.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 Covid-19 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 1172–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Medicine, N. Novavax Vaccine Results: How Effective is it against Variants? 2021. Available online: https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/novavax-vaccine-results-how-effective-is-it-against-variants (accessed on 12 July 2021).
  104. Fuenmayor, J.; Gòdia, F.; Cervera, L. Production of virus-like particles for vaccines. New Biotechnol. 2017, 39 (Pt B), 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Cai, X.; Zheng, W.; Pan, S.; Zhang, S.; Xie, Y.; Guo, H.; Wang, G.; Li, Z.; Luo, M. A virus-like particle of the hepatitis B virus preS antigen elicits robust neutralizing antibodies and T cell responses in mice. Antiviral. Res. 2018, 149, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bright, R.A.; Carter, D.M.; Daniluk, S.; Toapanta, F.R.; Ahmad, A.; Gavrilov, V.; Massare, M.; Pushko, P.; Mytle, N.; Rowe, T.; et al. Influenza virus-like particles elicit broader immune responses than whole virion inactivated influenza virus or recombinant hemagglutinin. Vaccine 2007, 25, 3871–3878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Harper, D.M.; Franco, E.L.; Wheeler, C.; Ferris, D.G.; Jenkins, D.; Schuind, A.; Zahaf, T.; Innis, B.; Naud, P.; De Carvalho, N.S.; et al. Efficacy of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine in prevention of infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004, 364, 1757–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lokugamage, K.G.; Yoshikawa-Iwata, N.; Ito, N.; Watts, D.M.; Wyde, P.R.; Wang, N.; Newman, P.; Kent Tseng, C.T.; Peters, C.J.; Makino, S. Chimeric coronavirus-like particles carrying severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SCoV) S protein protect mice against challenge with SCoV. Vaccine 2008, 26, 797–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. WHO. Interim Recommendations for Use of the Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccine, CoronaVac, Developed by Sinovac. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/341454/WHO-2019-nCoV-vaccines-SAGE-recommendation-Sinovac-CoronaVac-2021.1-eng.pdf (accessed on 24 May 2021).
  110. WHO. Status of COVID-19 Vaccines within WHO EUL/PQ Evaluation Process. Available online: https://extranet.who.int/pqweb/sites/default/files/documents/Status_COVID_VAX_02July2021.pdf (accessed on 2 July 2021).
  111. WHO. Background Document on the Inactivated Vaccine Sinovac-CoronaVac against COVID-19. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-vaccines-SAGE_recommendation-Sinovac-CoronaVac-background-2021.1 (accessed on 1 June 2021).
  112. Ramasamy, M.N.; Jessop, L.J. CoronaVac: More data for regulators and policy makers. Lancet 2021, 398, 186–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. WHO. Interim Recommendations for Use of the Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccine BIBP Developed by China National Biotec Group (CNBG), Sinopharm. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-vaccines-SAGE_recommendation-BIBP-2021.1 (accessed on 7 May 2021).
  114. Xia, S.; Duan, K.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, H.; Xie, Z.; Li, X.; Peng, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, W.; et al. Effect of an Inactivated Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2 on Safety and Immunogenicity Outcomes: Interim Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA 2020, 324, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Registry, C.C.T. A Phase III Clinical Trial for Inactivated Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19) Vaccine (Vero Cells). Available online: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=56651 (accessed on 4 July 2021).
  116. Pu, J.; Yu, Q.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Li, D.; Chen, H.; Long, R.; Zhao, Z.; Mou, T.; et al. An in-depth investigation of the safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. medRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. NIH. The Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity Study of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine for Preventing Against COVID-19. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04659239?term=vaccination&cond=covid&draw=3 (accessed on 10 February 2021).
  118. NIH. Immunogenicity, Efficacy and Safety of QazCovid-in® COVID-19 Vaccine. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04691908?id=NCT04639466+OR+NCT04659941+OR+NCT04691947+OR+NCT04651790+OR+NCT04659239+OR+NCT04648800+OR+NCT04691908+OR+NCT04656613+OR+NCT04672395+OR+NCT04673149+OR+NCT04671017+OR+NCT04685603+OR+NCT04664309+OR+NCT04686773+OR+NCT04681092+OR+NCT04662697+OR+NCT04652102+OR+NCT04665258+OR+NCT04649021+OR+NCT04686409+OR+NCT04690387+OR+NCT04666012+OR+NCT04649151+OR+NCT04655625+OR+NCT04684446+OR+NCT04668339+OR+NCT04683224+OR+NCT04674189+OR+NCT04690816+OR+NCT04679909&draw=2&rank=2&load=cart (accessed on 4 May 2021).
  119. Institute, E.R. QazCovid-in. Available online: https://economy.kz/en/Novosti_ekonomiki_Kazahstana/id=1588 (accessed on 20 December 2020).
  120. Ella, R.; Vadrevu, K.M.; Jogdand, H.; Prasad, S.; Reddy, S.; Sarangi, V.; Ganneru, B.; Sapkal, G.; Yadav, P.; Abraham, P.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: A double-blind, randomised, phase 1 trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Biotech, B. COVAXIN®—India’s First Indigenous COVID-19 Vaccine. Available online: https://www.bharatbiotech.com/covaxin.html (accessed on 4 July 2021).
  122. NIH. An Efficacy and Safety Clinical Trial of an Investigational COVID-19 Vaccine (BBV152) in Adult Volunteers. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04641481 (accessed on 19 March 2021).
  123. Ella, R.; Reddy, S.; Blackwelder, W.; Potdar, V.; Yadav, P.; Sarangi, V.; Aileni, V.K.; Kanungo, S.; Rai, S.; Reddy, P.; et al. Efficacy, safety, and lot to lot immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (BBV152): A, double-blind, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. NIH. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (Vero Cells), Inactivated in Healthy Adults Aged 18 Years and Older (COVID-19). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04852705?term=vaccine&recrs=abdf&cond=COVID-19&phase=0123&sort=nwst&draw=2 (accessed on 22 April 2021).
  125. NIH. Study To Compare the Immunogenicity Against COVID-19, of VLA2001 Vaccine to AZD1222 Vaccine (COV-COMPARE). Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04864561#contacts (accessed on 8 June 2021).
  126. NIH. Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of the Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccine (TURKOVAC) Versus the CoronaVac Vaccine. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04942405 (accessed on 28 June 2021).
  127. IRCT. A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase II/III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of COVID-19 Inactivated Vaccine (Shifa-Pharmed) in a Population Aged 18 to 75 Years. Available online: https://en.irct.ir/trial/54881 (accessed on 4 July 2021).
  128. IRCT. Phase 2 Trial of Safety and Immunogenicity of 10 Micro Gram Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (FAKHRAVAC), Two Doses Two Weeks Apart in Adults Aged 18–70 Years: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Trial. Available online: https://en.irct.ir/trial/56027 (accessed on 5 July 2021).
  129. Sun, W.; McCroskery, S.; Liu, W.-C.; Leist, S.R.; Liu, Y.; Albrecht, R.A.; Slamanig, S.; Oliva, J.; Amanat, F.; Schäfer, A.; et al. A Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) Expressing a Membrane-Anchored Spike as a Cost-Effective Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. Vaccines 2020, 8, 711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. JRCT. Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of KD-414, a Vaccine Against COVID-19, in Healthy Adults Aged ≥20 Years to <65 Years, and Healthy Elderly Subjects Aged ≥65 Years. Available online: https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT2071200106 (accessed on 5 July 2021).
  131. NIH. Safety and Immunogenicity of the Inactivated Koçak-19 Inaktif Adjuvanlı COVID-19 Vaccine Compared to Placebo. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04838080?term=NCT04838080&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 13 April 2021).
  132. NIH. Study of a Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Adjuvanted Inactivated Vaccine in Healthy Adults (COVID-19). Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04866069 (accessed on 6 May 2021).
  133. NIH. Study of a Live rNDV Based Vaccine against COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04871737 (accessed on 27 May 2021).
  134. NIH. Safety and Immunogenicity of COVI-VAC, a Live Attenuated Vaccine against COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04619628 (accessed on 6 November 2020).
  135. NIH. Safety and Immunogenicity of an Intranasal RSV Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein (COVID-19 Vaccine) in Adults. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04798001?term=covid-19+vaccine&draw=2 (accessed on 21 May 2021).
  136. Voysey, M.; Clemens, S.A.C.; Madhi, S.A.; Weckx, L.Y.; Folegatti, P.M.; Aley, P.K.; Angus, B.; Baillie, V.L.; Barnabas, S.L.; Bhorat, Q.E.; et al. Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: An interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK. Lancet 2021, 397, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. NIH. National Cohort Study of Effectiveness and Safety of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Vaccines (ENFORCE) (ENFORCE). Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04760132?term=vaccine%2C+phase+4&cond=Covid19&draw=2 (accessed on 26 February 2021).
  138. Africa CDC. Africa Regulatory Taskforce Has Endorsed the Emergency Used Listing for Two Versions of the AstraZeneca-Oxford Vaccine. Available online: https://africacdc.org/download/africa-regulatory-taskforce-has-endorsed-the-emergency-used-listing-for-two-versions-of-the-astrazeneca-oxford-vaccine-astrazeneca-skbio-in-south-korea-and-serum-institute-of-india/ (accessed on 7 June 2021).
  139. CARPHA. CARPHA COVID-19 Vaccine Update. Available online: https://carpha.org/Portals/0/Documents/COVID-19%20Vaccine%20Updates/CARPHA%20COVID-19%20Vaccine%20Update%20011%20March%2022,%202021.pdf (accessed on 22 March 2021).
  140. Voysey, M.; Costa Clemens, S.A.; Madhi, S.A.; Weckx, L.Y.; Folegatti, P.M.; Aley, P.K.; Angus, B.; Baillie, V.L.; Barnabas, S.L.; Bhorat, Q.E.; et al. Single-dose administration and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine: A pooled analysis of four randomised trials. Lancet 2021, 397, 881–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lopez Bernal, J.; Andrews, N.; Gower, C.; Robertson, C.; Stowe, J.; Tessier, E.; Simmons, R.; Cottrell, S.; Roberts, R.; O’Doherty, M.; et al. Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: Test negative case-control study. BMJ 2021, 373, n1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Vasileiou, E.; Simpson, C.R.; Shi, T.; Kerr, S.; Agrawal, U.; Akbari, A.; Bedston, S.; Beggs, J.; Bradley, D.; Chuter, A.; et al. Interim findings from first-dose mass COVID-19 vaccination roll-out and COVID-19 hospital admissions in Scotland: A national prospective cohort study. Lancet 2021, 397, 1646–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. BBC. Covid vaccine: AstraZeneca Updates US Vaccine Efficacy Results. Available online: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56521166 (accessed on 25 March 2021).
  144. Madhi, S.A.; Baillie, V.; Cutland, C.L.; Voysey, M.; Koen, A.L.; Fairlie, L.; Padayachee, S.D.; Dheda, K.; Barnabas, S.L.; Bhorat, Q.E.; et al. Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant in South Africa. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. EMA. COVID-19 Vaccines. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/public-health-threats/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/treatments-vaccines/covid-19-vaccines (accessed on 6 July 2021).
  146. NIH. Study on Sequential Immunization of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine and Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (Ad5 Vector). Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04892459?term=NCT04892459&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 30 June 2021).
  147. NIH. Clinical Trial of Recombinant Novel Coronavirus Vaccine (Adenovirus Type 5 Vector) Against COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04540419 (accessed on 16 February 2021).
  148. REUTERS. CanSinoBIO’s COVID-19 Vaccine 65.7% Effective in Global Trials, Pakistan Official Says. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-vaccine-pakistan-idUSKBN2A81N0 (accessed on 8 February 2021).
  149. Wu, S.; Zhong, G.; Zhang, J.; Shuai, L.; Zhang, Z.; Wen, Z.; Wang, B.; Zhao, Z.; Song, X.; Chen, Y.; et al. A single dose of an adenovirus-vectored vaccine provides protection against SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Zhu, F.-C.; Guan, X.-H.; Li, Y.-H.; Huang, J.-Y.; Jiang, T.; Hou, L.-H.; Li, J.-X.; Yang, B.-F.; Wang, L.; Wang, W.-J.; et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18 years or older: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2020, 396, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Vaccinations, P. Convidicea Vaccine. Available online: https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/vaccines/convidicea-vaccine (accessed on 30 June 2021).
  152. Africa CDC. African Union and the Africa CDC’s Africa Regulatory Taskforce Has Endorsed the Emergency Used Authorization for Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine. Available online: https://africacdc.org/download/african-union-and-the-africa-centers-for-disease-control-and-preventions-africa-regulatory-taskforce-has-endorsed-the-emergency-used-authorization-for-janssen-covid-19-vaccine-2/ (accessed on 7 June 2021).
  153. Corchado-Garcia, J.; Puyraimond-Zemmour, D.; Hughes, T.; Cristea-Platon, T.; Lenehan, P.; Pawlowski, C.; Bade, S.; O’Horo, J.C.; Gores, G.J.; Williams, A.W.; et al. Real-world effectiveness of Ad26.COV2.S adenoviral vector vaccine for COVID-19. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Logunov, D.Y.; Dolzhikova, I.V.; Zubkova, O.V.; Tukhvatulin, A.I.; Shcheblyakov, D.V.; Dzharullaeva, A.S.; Grousova, D.M.; Erokhova, A.S.; Kovyrshina, A.V.; Botikov, A.G.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine in two formulations: Two open, non-randomised phase 1/2 studies from Russia. Lancet 2020, 396, 887–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. NIH. Clinical Trial of Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Gam-COVID-Vac Vaccine Against COVID-19 (RESIST). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04530396?term=vaccine&cond=covid-19&draw=3 (accessed on 22 January 2021).
  156. Logunov, D.Y.; Dolzhikova, I.V.; Shcheblyakov, D.V.; Tukhvatulin, A.I.; Zubkova, O.V.; Dzharullaeva, A.S.; Kovyrshina, A.V.; Lubenets, N.L.; Grousova, D.M.; Erokhova, A.S.; et al. Safety and efficacy of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine: An interim analysis of a randomised controlled phase 3 trial in Russia. Lancet 2021, 397, 671–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. World News. Sputnik V Gives 90% Protection against Delta Strain of Covid-19: Scientist. In Hindustan Times; World News: New Delhi, India, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  158. NIH. Study of GRAd-COV2 for the Prevention of COVID-19 in Adults (COVITAR). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04791423 (accessed on 14 April 2021).
  159. Capone, S.; Raggioli, A.; Gentile, M.; Battella, S.; Lahm, A.; Sommella, A.; Contino, A.M.; Urbanowicz, R.A.; Scala, R.; Barra, F.; et al. Immunogenicity of a new gorilla adenovirus vaccine candidate for COVID-19. Mol. Ther. 2021, 29, 2412–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Lanini, S.; Capone, S.; Antinori, A.; Milleri, S.; Nicastri, E.; Camerini, R.; Agrati, C.; Castilletti, C.; Mori, F.; Sacchi, A.; et al. GRAd-COV2, a gorilla adenovirus based candidate vaccine against COVID-19, is safe and immunogenic in young and older adults. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. NIH. Immunity and Safety of Covid-19 Synthetic Minigene Vaccine. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04276896 (accessed on 19 March 2021).
  162. NIH. COVID-19 Supplemental Vaccine Boost to Enhance T Cell Protection in Those Who Have Already Received EUA S-Based Vaccines. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04843722 (accessed on 10 June 2021).
  163. ImmunityBio. Fighting a war on two fronts: ImmunityBio targets cancer and COVID-19. Biopharma Deal. 2021. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/d43747-020-00963-y (accessed on 8 June 2021).
  164. Rice, A.; Verma, M.; Shin, A.; Zakin, L.; Sieling, P.; Tanaka, S.; Adisetiyo, H.; Taft, J.; Patel, R.; Buta, S.; et al. A Next Generation Bivalent Human Ad5 COVID-19 Vaccine Delivering Both Spike and Nucleocapsid Antigens Elicits Th1 Dominant CD4+, CD8+ T-cell and Neutralizing Antibody Responses. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. NIH. Safety and Immunogenicity Study of AdCLD-CoV19: A COVID-19 Preventive Vaccine in Healthy Volunteers. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04666012 (accessed on 29 March 2021).
  166. NIH. A Phase 1/2 Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of COVID-19 Vaccine COVIVAC. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04830800 (accessed on 5 April 2021).
  167. NIH. Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of the Candidate Vaccine MVA-SARS-2-ST Against COVID-19 (MVA-SARS-2-ST). Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04895449?term=NCT04895449&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 20 May 2021).
  168. NIH. Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of the Candidate Vaccine MVA-SARS-2-S Against COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04569383?term=vaccine&cond=covid-19&draw=5 (accessed on 1 December 2020).
  169. NIH. Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of an Oral SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (VXA-CoV2-1) for Prevention of COVID-19 in Healthy Adults. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04563702 (accessed on 8 April 2021).
  170. Moore, A.C.; Dora, E.G.; Peinovich, N.; Tucker, K.P.; Lin, K.; Cortese, M.; Tucker, S.N. Pre-clinical studies of a recombinant adenoviral mucosal vaccine to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. NIH. Safety and Immunogenicity of AdCOVID in Healthy Adults (COVID-19 Vaccine Study). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04679909 (accessed on 24 February 2021).
  172. NIH. A Synthetic MVA-Based SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine, COH04S1, for the Prevention of COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04639466 (accessed on 7 January 2021).
  173. NIH. Chimpanzee Adenovirus and Self-Amplifying mRNA Prime-Boost Prophylactic Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in Healthy Adults. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04776317 (accessed on 2 July 2021).
  174. NIH. A Phase 1, First-in-Human Study of the Investigational COVID-19 Vaccine SC-Ad6-1 in Healthy Volunteers. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04839042 (accessed on 27 April 2021).
  175. NIH. Safety and Immunogenicity of an Intranasal SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (BBV154) for COVID-19. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04751682?term=vaccine&cond=Coronavirus&sfpd_s=01%2F01%2F2021&draw=2 (accessed on 22 June 2021).
  176. ChiCTR. The Nasal Spray Influenza Virus Vector New Coronary Pneumonia (COVID-19) Vaccine (DelNS1-2019-nCoV-RBD-OPT1) Phase II Clinical Trial. 2020. Available online: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=63754 (accessed on 7 August 2021).
  177. NIH. A Study to Evaluate Safety and Immunogenicity of DelNS1-nCoV-RBD LAIV for COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04809389 (accessed on 3 May 2021).
  178. Yahalom-Ronen, Y.; Tamir, H.; Melamed, S.; Politi, B.; Shifman, O.; Achdout, H.; Vitner, E.B.; Israeli, O.; Milrot, E.; Stein, D.; et al. A single dose of recombinant VSV-ΔG-spike vaccine provides protection against SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. NIH. Phase I-II Trial of Dendritic Cell Vaccine to Prevent COVID-19 in Adults. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04386252 (accessed on 8 June 2021).
  180. NIH. Safety and Immunity of Covid-19 aAPC Vaccine. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04299724 (accessed on 9 March 2021).
  181. CTRI. A Prospective, Randomized, Adaptive, Phase I/II Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Novel Corona Virus -2019-nCov Vaccine Candidate of M/s Cadila Healthcare Limited by Intradermal Route in Healthy Subjects. Available online: http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/showallp.php?mid1=45306&EncHid=&userName=Zydus (accessed on 8 November 2020).
  182. Das, S. Zydus’ Covid-19 vaccine shows 66.6% efficacy, seeks DCGI approval. In Business Standard; Fiancial Press: New Delhi, India, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  183. Mammen, M.P.; Tebas, P.; Agnes, J.; Giffear, M.; Kraynyak, K.A.; Blackwood, E.; Amante, D.; Reuschel, E.L.; Purwar, M.; Christensen-Quick, A.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of INO-4800 DNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: A preliminary report of a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 clinical trial in adults at high risk of viral exposure. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. NIH. Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of INO-4800 for COVID-19 in Healthy Seronegative Adults at High Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Exposure. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04642638 (accessed on 29 March 2021).
  185. NIH. Phase II/III Study of COVID-19 DNA Vaccine (AG0302-COVID19). Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04655625?term=vaccination&cond=covid&draw=1 (accessed on 8 April 2021).
  186. NIH. Safety and Immunogenicity Study of GX-19, a COVID-19 Preventive DNA Vaccine in Healthy Adults. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04445389?term=vaccine&cond=covid-19&draw=3 (accessed on 28 July 2020).
  187. NIH. A Clinical Trial of a Prophylactic Plasmid DNA Vaccine for COVID-19 [Covigenix VAX-001] in Adults. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04591184 (accessed on 27 April 2021).
  188. Sciences, G.L. Nucleic Acid Vaccines. Available online: http://www.genels.com/en/sub/technology/vaccine.asp (accessed on 1 September 2021).
  189. NIH. GLS-5310 Vaccine for the Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04673149?term=NCT04673149&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 24 December 2020).
  190. NIH. Safety and Immunogenicity of COVID-eVax, a Candidate Plasmid DNA Vaccine for COVID-19, in Healthy Adult Volunteers. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04788459 (accessed on 16 March 2020).
  191. NIH. CORVax12: SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) Protein Plasmid DNA Vaccine Trial for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) (CORVax12). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04627675 (accessed on 3 June 2021).
  192. NIH. Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of bacTRL-Spike Vaccine for Prevention of COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04334980 (accessed on 4 March 2021).
  193. NIH. The Safety and Immunogenicity of a DNA-based Vaccine (COVIGEN) in Healthy Volunteers (COVALIA). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04742842 (accessed on 8 February 2020).
  194. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting December 17, 2020; Food and Drug Administration (FDA): White Oak, MD, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  195. Thompson, M.G.; Burgess, J.L.; Naleway, A.L.; Tyner, H.L.; Yoon, S.K.; Meece, J.; Olsho, L.E.W.; Caban-Martinez, A.J.; Fowlkes, A.; Lutrick, K.; et al. Interim Estimates of Vaccine Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccines in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Personnel, First Responders, and Other Essential and Frontline Workers—Eight U.S. Locations, December 2020–March 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 2021, 70, 495–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Thompson, M.G.; Burgess, J.L.; Naleway, A.L.; Tyner, H.; Yoon, S.K.; Meece, J.; Olsho, L.E.W.; Caban-Martinez, A.J.; Fowlkes, A.L.; Lutrick, K.; et al. Prevention and Attenuation of COVID-19 by BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Chung, H.; He, S.; Nasreen, S.; Sundaram, M.E.; Buchan, S.A.; Wilson, S.E.; Chen, B.; Calzavara, A.; Fell, D.B.; Austin, P.C.; et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes in Ontario, Canada. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. NIH. A Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 Vaccine in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older to Prevent COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04470427?term=vaccine&cond=covid-19&draw=5 (accessed on 10 June 2021).
  199. Hall, V.J.; Foulkes, S.; Saei, A.; Andrews, N.; Oguti, B.; Charlett, A.; Wellington, E.; Stowe, J.; Gillson, N.; Atti, A.; et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Against Infection and COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage in Healthcare Workers in England, Multicentre Prospective Cohort Study (the SIREN Study). SSRN 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Pawlowski, C.; Lenehan, P.; Puranik, A.; Agarwal, V.; Venkatakrishnan, A.J.; Niesen, M.J.M.; O’Horo, J.C.; Badley, A.D.; Halamka, J.; Soundararajan, V. FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccines are effective per real-world evidence synthesized across a multi-state health system. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Dagan, N.; Barda, N.; Kepten, E.; Miron, O.; Perchik, S.; Katz, M.A.; Hernán, M.A.; Lipsitch, M.; Reis, B.; Balicer, R.D. BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Mass Vaccination Setting. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 1412–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Björk, J.; Inghammar, M.; Moghaddassi, M.; Rasmussen, M.; Malmqvist, U.; Kahn, F. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine in preventing COVID-19 in the working age population—First results from a cohort study in Southern Sweden. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Public Health England. Annex A: Report to JCVI on estimated efficacy of a single dose of Pfizer BioNTech (BNT162b2 mRNA) vaccine and of a single dose of ChAdOx1 vaccine (AZD1222). Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/949505/annex-a-phe-report-to-jcvi-on-estimated-efficacy-of-single-vaccine-dose.pdf (accessed on 22 December 2020).
  204. Chodick, G.; Tene, L.; Patalon, T.; Gazit, S.; Ben Tov, A.; Cohen, D.; Muhsen, K. Assessment of Effectiveness of 1 Dose of BNT162b2 Vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 Infection 13 to 24 Days After Immunization. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e2115985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Moustsen-Helms, I.R.; Emborg, H.-D.; Nielsen, J.; Nielsen, K.F.; Krause, T.G.; Mølbak, K.; Møller, K.L.; Berthelsen, A.-S.N.; Valentiner-Branth, P. Vaccine effectiveness after 1st and 2nd dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in long-term care facility residents and healthcare workers—A Danish cohort study. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Chodick, G.; Tene, L.; Patalon, T.; Gazit, S.; Tov, A.B.; Cohen, D.; Muhsen, K. The effectiveness of the first dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in reducing SARS-CoV-2 infection 13-24 days after immunization: Real-world evidence. medRxiv.
  207. CARPHA. Carpha Situation Report NO. 145. Available online: https://carpha.org/Portals/0/Documents/COVID%20Situation%20Reports/Situation%20Report%20145%20-%20April%201,%202021.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  208. Creech, C.B.; Walker, S.C.; Samuels, R.J. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines. JAMA 2021, 325, 1318–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Polack, F.P.; Thomas, S.J.; Kitchin, N.; Absalon, J.; Gurtman, A.; Lockhart, S.; Perez, J.L.; Pérez Marc, G.; Moreira, E.D.; Zerbini, C.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2603–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. NIH. A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Vaccine CVnCoV in Healthy Adults in Germany for COVID-19. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04674189?id=NCT04639466+OR+NCT04655625+OR+NCT04662697+OR+NCT04683224+OR+NCT04668339+OR+NCT04674189+OR+NCT04665258+OR+NCT04646590+OR+NCT04642638+OR+NCT04656613+OR+NCT04648800+OR+NCT04649515+OR+NCT04677660+OR+NCT04668625+OR+NCT04649021+OR+NCT04649151+OR+NCT04659486+OR+NCT04664075&draw=2&rank=3&load=cart (accessed on 18 June 2021).
  211. CureVac. CureVac’s mRNA-based vaccine candidate against COVID-19. Available online: https://www.curevac.com/en/covid-19/ (accessed on 16 June 2021).
  212. Rauch, S.; Roth, N.; Schwendt, K.; Fotin-Mleczek, M.; Mueller, S.O.; Petsch, B. mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate CVnCoV induces high levels of virus-neutralising antibodies and mediates protection in rodents. NPJ Vaccines 2021, 6, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. NIH. A Phase III Clinical Study of a SARS-CoV-2 Messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) Vaccine Candidate Against COVID-19 in Population Aged 18 Years and Above. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04847102 (accessed on 17 May 2021).
  214. Zhang, N.-N.; Li, X.-F.; Deng, Y.-Q.; Zhao, H.; Huang, Y.-J.; Yang, G.; Huang, W.-J.; Gao, P.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, R.-R.; et al. A Thermostable mRNA Vaccine against COVID-19. Cell 2020, 182, 1271–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. NIH. A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of mRNA-1273.211 Vaccine for COVID-19 Variants. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04927065 (accessed on 15 June 2021).
  216. Wu, K.; Choi, A.; Koch, M.; Ma, L.; Hill, A.; Nunna, N.; Huang, W.; Oestreicher, J.; Colpitts, T.; Bennett, H.; et al. Preliminary Analysis of Safety and Immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 Variant Vaccine Booster. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. NIH. Dose-Confirmation Study to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccine in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04405076 (accessed on 5 May 2021).
  218. NIH. Safety and Immunogenicity Study of a SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Variant Vaccine (mRNA-1273.351) in Naïve and Previously Vaccinated Adults. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04785144 (accessed on 2 July 2021).
  219. NIH. A Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effects of an RNA Vaccine ARCT-021 in Healthy Adults. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04668339?term=vaccination&cond=covid&draw=1 (accessed on 29 March 2021).
  220. NIH. Open Label Extension Study to Assess the Safety and Long-Term Immunogenicity of ARCT-021. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04728347 (accessed on 28 January 2021).
  221. Holdings, A.T. Arcturus—A Clinical-Stage mRNA Therapeutics and Vaccines Company. Biopharma Deal. 2021. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/d43747-021-00073-3 (accessed on 10 June 2021).
  222. NIH. Study of mRNA Vaccine Formulation against COVID-19 in Healthy Adults 18 Years of Age and Older (VAW00001). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04798027?term=Sanofi&cond=COVID-19&draw=2&rank=2 (accessed on 29 June 2021).
  223. Kalnin, K.V.; Plitnik, T.; Kishko, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, D.; Beauvais, A.; Anosova, N.G.; Tibbitts, T.; DiNapoli, J.; Ulinski, G.; et al. Immunogenicity and efficacy of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine MRT5500 in preclinical animal models. NPJ Vaccines 2021, 6, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Sanofi. Sanofi and Translate Bio Initiate Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate. Available online: https://www.sanofi.com/en/media-room/press-releases/2021/2021-03-12-07-00-00-2191846# (accessed on 12 March 2021).
  225. NIH. Study of DS-5670a (COVID-19 Vaccine) in Japanese Healthy Adults and Elderly Subjects. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04821674 (accessed on 8 July 2021).
  226. Yan, Z.P.; Yang, M.; Lai, C.L. COVID-19 Vaccines: A Review of the Safety and Efficacy of Current Clinical Trials. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. NIH. Safety and Immunogenicity of EXG-5003. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04863131 (accessed on 30 April 2021).
  228. ISRCTN Registry. Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety of a Coronavirus Vaccine in Healthy Men and Women. 2020. Available online: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17072692 (accessed on 7 September 2021).
  229. Imperial College London. COVAC1: How the Trial Works. Available online: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/covid-19-vaccine-trial/trial-info/ (accessed on 7 June 2021).
  230. Wise, N. The Latest Development in ChulaCov19 Vaccine. Available online: https://www.newswise.com/coronavirus/the-latest-development-in-chulacov19-vaccine (accessed on 30 March 2021).
  231. NIH. ChulaCov19 mRNA Vaccine in Healthy Adults. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04566276 (accessed on 6 October 2020).
  232. NIH. PTX-COVID19-B, an mRNA Humoral Vaccine, is Intended for Prevention of COVID-19 in a General Population. This Study is Designed to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of PTX-COVID19-B Vaccine in Healthy Seronegative Adults Aged 18–64. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04765436?id=NCT04747821+OR+NCT04756830+OR+NCT04733807+OR+NCT04728828+OR+NCT04760704+OR+NCT04765436&draw=2&rank=1&load=cart (accessed on 30 June 2021).
  233. Susha Cheriyedath, M.S. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine PTX-COVID19-B Safe and Highly Immunogenic in Preclinical Study. Available online: https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210518/SARS-CoV-2-mRNA-vaccine-PTX-COVID19-B-safe-and-highly-immunogenic-in-preclinical-study.aspx (accessed on 18 May 2021).
  234. NIH. A Study of the Safety of and Immune Response to Varying Doses of a Vaccine Against COVID-19 in Healthy Adults. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04758962 (accessed on 21 June 2021).
  235. NIH. Phase 1 Study to Assess Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity of the HDT-301 Vaccine Against COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04844268 (accessed on 19 April 2021).
  236. NIH. A Study to Evaluate Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1283 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in Healthy Adults Between 18 Years and 55 Years of Age to Prevent COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04813796 (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  237. Moderna, Inc. First Participants Dosed in Phase 1 Study Evaluating mRNA-1283, Moderna’s Next Generation COVID-19 Vaccine. Available online: https://investors.modernatx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/first-participants-dosed-phase-1-study-evaluating-mrna-1283 (accessed on 15 March 2021).
  238. ChiCTR. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase I Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of mRNACOVID-19 Vaccine in Healthy Susceptible Populations Aged 18 Years and Older People. Available online: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=126046 (accessed on 7 September 2021).
  239. BioWorld. Stemirna Raises Nearly $200M to Advance mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine. Available online: https://www.bioworld.com/articles/507855-stemirna-raises-nearly-200m-to-advance-mrna-covid-19-vaccine?v=preview (accessed on 4 June 2021).
  240. NIH. Safety and Immunogenicity of LNP-nCOV saRNA-02 Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, the Causative Agent of COVID-19 (COVAC-Uganda). Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04934111?term=vaccine&type=Intr&cond=Covid19&draw=2 (accessed on 22 June 2021).
  241. NIH. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Immune Response, and Safety of a COVID-19 Vaccine in Adults ≥18 Years With a Pediatric Expansion in Adolescents (12–17 Years) at Risk for SARS-CoV-2. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04611802 (accessed on 6 May 2021).
  242. Shinde, V.; Bhikha, S.; Hoosain, Z.; Archary, M.; Bhorat, Q.; Fairlie, L.; Lalloo, U.; Masilela, M.S.L.; Moodley, D.; Hanley, S.; et al. Efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 1899–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Novavax, Inc. Novavax COVID-19 Vaccine Demonstrates 89.3% Efficacy in UK Phase 3 Trial. 2021. Available online: https://ir.novavax.com/news-releases/news-release-details/novavax-covid-19-vaccine-demonstrates-893-efficacy-uk-phase-3 (accessed on 7 September 2021).
  244. Yang, S.; Li, Y.; Dai, L.; Wang, J.; He, P.; Li, C.; Fang, X.; Wang, C.; Zhao, X.; Huang, E.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant tandem-repeat dimeric RBD-based protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001) against COVID-19 in adults: Two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 and 2 trials. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 1107–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. NIH. A Phase III Clinical Trial to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of ZF2001 for Prevention of COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04646590 (accessed on 7 May 2021).
  246. NIH. Study of Monovalent and Bivalent Recombinant Protein Vaccines Against COVID-19 in Adults 18 Years of Age and Older (VAT00008). 2021. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04904549 (accessed on 11 June 2021).
  247. Sanofi. Sanofi and GSK Initiate Global Phase 3 Clinical Efficacy Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate. Available online: https://www.sanofi.com/en/media-room/press-releases/2021/2021-05-27-07-30-00-2236989 (accessed on 7 September 2021).
  248. ZAWYA. Cuba Encouraged by Early Efficacy Results of Homegrown COVID-19 Vaccine. Available online: https://www.zawya.com/mena/en/economy/story/Cuba_encouraged_by_early_efficacy_results_of_homegrown_COVID19_vaccine-TR20210620nL2N2O2003X1/ (accessed on 20 June 2021).
  249. RPCEC. SOBERANA 02-FaseIII. Available online: https://rpcec.sld.cu/en/trials/RPCEC00000354-En (accessed on 7 September 2021).
  250. Chang-Monteagudo, A.; Ochoa-Azze, R.; Climent-Ruiz, Y.; Macías-Abraham, C.; Rodríguez-Noda, L.; Valenzuela-Silva, C.; Sánchez-Ramírez, B.; Perez-Nicado, R.; González-Mugica, R.; Hernández-García, T.; et al. A single dose of SARS-CoV-2 FINLAY-FR-1A dimeric-RBD recombinant vaccine enhances neutralization response in COVID-19 convalescents, with excellent safety profile. A preliminary report of an open-label phase 1 clinical trial. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. NIH. A Global Phase III Clinical Trial of Recombinant COVID- 19 Vaccine (Sf9 Cells). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04887207 (accessed on 30 June 2021).
  252. NIH. Study of the Tolerability, Safety, Immunogenicity and Preventive Efficacy of the EpiVacCorona Vaccine for the Prevention of COVID-19. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04780035?term=vaccine&cond=Covid19&draw=2 (accessed on 3 March 2021).
  253. News, D. Two More Russian Vaccines: What We Do and Don’t Know. Available online: https://www.dw.com/en/two-more-russian-vaccines-what-we-do-and-dont-know/a-56811025 (accessed on 3 March 2021).
  254. Mahase, E. Covid-19: Russian vaccine efficacy is 91.6%, show phase III trial results. BMJ 2021, 372, n309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. RPCEC. ABDALA Clinical Study—Phase III. Available online: https://rpcec.sld.cu/trials/RPCEC00000359-En (accessed on 8 September 2021).
  256. NIH. Study to Evaluate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of Nanocovax Vaccine Against COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04922788 (accessed on 8 September 2021).
  257. NIH. A Controlled Phase 2/3 Study of Adjuvanted Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Trimeric S-protein Vaccine (SCB-2019) for the Prevention of COVID-19 (SCB-2019). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04672395 (accessed on 11 June 2021).
  258. Liang, J.G.; Su, D.; Song, T.-Z.; Zeng, Y.; Huang, W.; Wu, J.; Xu, R.; Luo, P.; Yang, X.; Zhang, X.; et al. S-Trimer, a COVID-19 subunit vaccine candidate, induces protective immunity in nonhuman primates. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Richmond, P.; Hatchuel, L.; Dong, M.; Ma, B.; Hu, B.; Smolenov, I.; Li, P.; Liang, P.; Han, H.H.; Liang, J.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of S-Trimer (SCB-2019), a protein subunit vaccine candidate for COVID-19 in healthy adults: A phase 1, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2021, 397, 682–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. NIH. A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of UB-612 COVID-19 Vaccine. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04683224?id=NCT04639466+OR+NCT04655625+OR+NCT04662697+OR+NCT04683224+OR+NCT04668339+OR+NCT04674189+OR+NCT04665258+OR+NCT04646590+OR+NCT04642638+OR+NCT04656613+OR+NCT04648800+OR+NCT04649515+OR+NCT04677660+OR+NCT04668625+OR+NCT04649021+OR+NCT04649151+OR+NCT04659486+OR+NCT04664075&draw=2&rank=1&load=cart (accessed on 24 December 2020).
  261. RPCEC. SOBERANA 01. Available online: https://rpcec.sld.cu/en/trials/RPCEC00000332-En (accessed on 3 July 2021).
  262. IRCT. A phase II, Randomized, Two-armed, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of an Adjuvanted Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) Protein Subunit Vaccine (SpikoGen®) Produced by CinnaGen Co. (Two doses of 25 µg with Dosing Interval of 21 days). 2021. Available online: https://www.irct.ir/trial/56287 (accessed on 3 July 2021).
  263. NIH. A Study to Evaluate MVC-COV1901 Vaccine Against COVID-19 in Adult (COVID-19). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04695652 (accessed on 30 March 2021).
  264. NIH. A Study to Evaluate MVC-COV1901 Vaccine Against COVID-19 in Elderly Adults. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04822025 (accessed on 15 June 2021).
  265. Hsieh, S.-M.; Liu, W.-D.; Huang, Y.-S.; Lin, Y.-J.; Hsieh, E.-F.; Lian, W.-C.; Chen, C.; Janssen, R.; Shih, S.-R.; Huang, C.-G.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a Recombinant Stabilized Prefusion SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Vaccine (MVC COV1901) Adjuvanted with CpG 1018 and Aluminum Hydroxide in healthy adults: A Phase 1, dose-escalation study. EClinicalMedicine 2021, 38, 100989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. IRCT. Phase II, Safety and Immunogenicity of RAZI SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Spike Protein Vaccine (RAZI Cov Pars) in Adults Aged 18–70 Years; a Randomised, Double Blind, parallel 2 Arms Clinical Trial. 2021. Available online: https://en.irct.ir/trial/55238 (accessed on 8 September 2021).
  267. ChiCTR. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Fusion Protein Vaccine (V-01) in Healthy Subjects. 2021. Available online: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=124702 (accessed on 9 July 2021).
  268. RPCEC. MAMBISA Study. 2021. Available online: https://rpcec.sld.cu/en/trials/RPCEC00000345-En (accessed on 9 July 2021).
  269. EurekAlert. BAT Progresses COVID-19 Candidate Vaccine into Phase I Human Clinical Trials. Available online: https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-12/raba-bpc121520.php (accessed on 1 July 2021).
  270. NIH. KBP-201 COVID-19 Vaccine Trial in Healthy Volunteers. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04473690 (accessed on 10 June 2021).
  271. Biological E’s Novel Covid-19 Vaccine of SARS-CoV-2 for Protection against Covid-19 Disease. Available online: http://www.ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=48329 (accessed on 10 November 2020).
  272. JRCT. A Phase 1/2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study of S-268019 in Japanese Adult Participants. Available online: https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT2051200092 (accessed on 9 December 2020).
  273. NIH. Anti-COVID19 AKS-452—ACT Study (ACT). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04681092?term=NCT04681092&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 23 April 2021).
  274. NIH. A Clinical Trial of COVAC-2 in Healthy Adults. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04702178 (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  275. NIH. Safety and Immunogenicity Study of SARS-CoV-2 Nanoparticle Vaccine (GBP510) Adjuvanted with Aluminum Hydroxide (COVID-19). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04742738 (accessed on 8 February 2021).
  276. NIH. Reactogenicity, Safety and Immunogenicity of QazCoVac-P COVID-19 Vaccine. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04930003?term=vaccine&recrs=adf&cond=COVID-19&phase=0123&sort=nwst&draw=2 (accessed on 18 June 2021).
  277. NIH. Safety, Tolerance and Immunogenicity of EuCorVac-19 for the Prevention of COVID-19 in Healthy Adults. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04783311 (accessed on 26 April 2021).
  278. NIH. A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (CHO Cell) for COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04869592 (accessed on 7 May 2021).
  279. NIH. A Study on the Safety, Tolerability and Immune Response of SARS-CoV-2 Sclamp (COVID-19) Vaccine in Healthy Adults. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04495933 (accessed on 23 April 2021).
  280. Watterson, D.; Wijesundara, D.K.; Modhiran, N.; Mordant, F.L.; Li, Z.; Avumegah, M.S.; McMillan, C.L.; Lackenby, J.; Guilfoyle, K.; van Amerongen, G.; et al. Preclinical development of a molecular clamp-stabilised subunit vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2021, 10, e1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  281. Chappell, K.J.; Mordant, F.L.; Li, Z.; Wijesundara, D.K.; Ellenberg, P.; Lackenby, J.A.; Cheung, S.T.M.; Modhiran, N.; Avumegah, M.S.; Henderson, C.L.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted spike glycoprotein-clamp vaccine for SARS-CoV-2: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 1383–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. NIH. Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of Multi-peptide Vaccination to Prevent COVID-19 Infection in Adults (pVAC). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04546841?term=vaccine&cond=covid-19&draw=2 (accessed on 1 December 2020).
  283. NIH. A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of COVID-19 (AdimrSC-2f) Vaccine. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04522089 (accessed on 13 January 2021).
  284. NIH. Safety and Immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (NBP2001) in Healthy Adults (COVID-19). Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04760743 (accessed on 18 February 2021).
  285. NIH. Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity Study of ReCOV. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04818801 (accessed on 26 March 2021).
  286. NIH. SARS-COV-2-Spike-Ferritin-Nanoparticle (SpFN) Vaccine With ALFQ Adjuvant for Prevention of COVID-19 in Healthy Adults. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04784767 (accessed on 20 April 2021).
  287. Joyce, M.G.; King, H.A.D.; Naouar, I.E.; Ahmed, A.; Peachman, K.K.; Cincotta, C.M.; Subra, C.; Chen, R.E.; Thomas, P.V.; Chen, W.-H.; et al. Efficacy of a Broadly Neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 Ferritin Nanoparticle Vaccine in Nonhuman Primates. bioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Carmen, J.M.; Shrivastava, S.; Lu, Z.; Anderson, A.; Morrison, E.B.; Sankhala, R.S.; Chen, W.-H.; Chang, W.C.; Bolton, J.S.; Matyas, G.R.; et al. A spike-ferritin nanoparticle vaccine induces robust innate immune activity and drives polyfunctional SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells. bioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. NIH. To Evaluate the Safety, and Immunogenicity of Vaccine Candidate against COVID-19, in Healthy Adults (COVEPIT 3). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04885361 (accessed on 9 June 2021).
  290. NIH. First-in-Human Study Of Orally Administered CoV2-OGEN1 in Healthy Subjects. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04893512 (accessed on 7 June 2021).
  291. NIH. Study of a Recombinant Coronavirus-Like Particle COVID-19 Vaccine in Adults. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04636697 (accessed on 24 May 2021).
  292. Ward, B.J.; Gobeil, P.; Séguin, A.; Atkins, J.; Boulay, I.; Charbonneau, P.-Y.; Couture, M.; D’Aoust, M.-A.; Dhaliwall, J.; Finkle, C.; et al. Phase 1 randomized trial of a plant-derived virus-like particle vaccine for COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. ACT. A Phase 1/2 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Centre Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccine in Healthy Adults. 2020. Available online: https://www.australianclinicaltrials.gov.au/anzctr/trial/ACTRN12620000817943 (accessed on 4 July 2021).
  294. NIH. Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of the COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate (VBI-2902a). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04636697https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04773665 (accessed on 21 April 2021).
  295. NIH. Study of a Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoV-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Virus-Like Particle (VLP) Vaccine in Healthy Adults (COVID-19). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04818281?cond=NCT04818281&draw=2 (accessed on 8 April 2021).
  296. NIH. Safety and Tolerability of COVID-19 Vaccine (ABNCoV2) (COUGH-1). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04839146 (accessed on 9 April 2021).
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 structure and contemporary COVID-19 vaccine platforms. (a) Schematic diagram of SARS-CoV-2 structure including the single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) genome and the four structural proteins: spike protein (S), envelope protein (E), membrane protein (M), and nucleocaspid protein (N). Diverse vaccine platforms including (b) inactivated vaccine (c) live attenuated vaccine (d) viral vector vaccine (e) DNA vaccine (f) RNA vaccine (g) recombinant subunit vaccine (h) virus-like particles vaccine. mRNA: messenger RNA, RBD: receptor-binding domain. The diagram was created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 structure and contemporary COVID-19 vaccine platforms. (a) Schematic diagram of SARS-CoV-2 structure including the single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) genome and the four structural proteins: spike protein (S), envelope protein (E), membrane protein (M), and nucleocaspid protein (N). Diverse vaccine platforms including (b) inactivated vaccine (c) live attenuated vaccine (d) viral vector vaccine (e) DNA vaccine (f) RNA vaccine (g) recombinant subunit vaccine (h) virus-like particles vaccine. mRNA: messenger RNA, RBD: receptor-binding domain. The diagram was created with BioRender.com.
Vaccines 09 01196 g001
Figure 2. Phases of COVID-19 vaccine development. (a) The total number of currently available COVID-19 vaccine candidates in the pre-clinical and clinical phases of development. (b) Number of developed COVID-19 vaccine candidates per vaccine platform. Data was retrieved from the World Health Organization (WHO) vaccine tracker and landscape website [26] on 29 June 2021. N.B. The reported numbers are subject to change with time given the current efforts and pace of COVID-19 vaccines development. EU: emergency use, FDA: food and drug administration, EUA: emergency use authorization. The figure and tablewere created with BioRender.com.
Figure 2. Phases of COVID-19 vaccine development. (a) The total number of currently available COVID-19 vaccine candidates in the pre-clinical and clinical phases of development. (b) Number of developed COVID-19 vaccine candidates per vaccine platform. Data was retrieved from the World Health Organization (WHO) vaccine tracker and landscape website [26] on 29 June 2021. N.B. The reported numbers are subject to change with time given the current efforts and pace of COVID-19 vaccines development. EU: emergency use, FDA: food and drug administration, EUA: emergency use authorization. The figure and tablewere created with BioRender.com.
Vaccines 09 01196 g002aVaccines 09 01196 g002b
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Jighefee, H.T.; Najjar, H.; Ahmed, M.N.; Qush, A.; Awwad, S.; Kamareddine, L. COVID-19 Vaccine Platforms: Challenges and Safety Contemplations. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101196

AMA Style

Al-Jighefee HT, Najjar H, Ahmed MN, Qush A, Awwad S, Kamareddine L. COVID-19 Vaccine Platforms: Challenges and Safety Contemplations. Vaccines. 2021; 9(10):1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101196

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Jighefee, Hadeel T., Hoda Najjar, Muna Nizar Ahmed, Abeer Qush, Sara Awwad, and Layla Kamareddine. 2021. "COVID-19 Vaccine Platforms: Challenges and Safety Contemplations" Vaccines 9, no. 10: 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101196

APA Style

Al-Jighefee, H. T., Najjar, H., Ahmed, M. N., Qush, A., Awwad, S., & Kamareddine, L. (2021). COVID-19 Vaccine Platforms: Challenges and Safety Contemplations. Vaccines, 9(10), 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101196

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop