Next Article in Journal
Differences in Immune Checkpoints Expression (TIM-3 and PD-1) on T Cells in Women with Recurrent Miscarriages—Preliminary Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Durability of Transcatheter Heart Valves: Standardized Definitions and Available Data
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 10
Issue 18
10.3390/jcm10184181
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Lidocaine with Epinephrine in Ultrasound Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomised Controlled Trial

by
Anil Ranganath
1,*,
Tomas Hitka
2 and
Gabriella Iohom
2
1
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Connolly Hospital, D15 X40D Dublin, Ireland
2
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Cork University Hospital, T12 DC4A Cork, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(18), 4181; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184181
Submission received: 13 August 2021 / Revised: 10 September 2021 / Accepted: 13 September 2021 / Published: 16 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Anesthesiology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study evaluated the effects of adding adjuvant clonidine to lidocaine with epinephrine on the characteristics of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block (ABPB) for upper extremity surgery. Twenty-four patients were randomised to receive an ultrasound guided ABPB with 20 mL of lidocaine 2% with 1:200,000 epinephrine plus 2 mL of either normal saline 0.9% (Group 1) or a mixture of clonidine 1 µg/kg and normal saline 0.9% (Group 2). The outcome measures that were recorded were the overall onset time and the duration of sensory and motor block. The median (IQR) overall onset time of sensory and motor block was significantly shorter in Group 2 vs. Group 1 (5 (5–7.5) min vs. 10 (8.8–12.5) min; p < 0.001) and (5 (2.5–7.5) min vs. 7.5 (6.3–7.5) min; p = 0.001), respectively. The median (IQR) overall duration of sensory and motor block was significantly longer in Group 2 vs. Group 1 (225 (200–231) min vs. 168 (148–190) min; p < 0.001) and (225 (208–231) min vs. 168(148–186) min; p < 0.001), respectively. In ultrasound-guided ABPB, the addition of clonidine to lidocaine with epinephrine resulted in shorter onset time and prolonged duration of sensory and motor block.

1. Introduction

Adjuncts to local anaesthetics for peripheral nerve blocks have been widely used to enhance the quality and duration of both anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The two most commonly used α2-adrenergic agonists to enhance the characteristics of nerve block are clonidine and dexmedetomidine [7,8]. Previous studies have yielded conflicting results when clonidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist, was combined with local anaesthetics for the purpose of a peripheral nerve blockade. While several studies on brachial plexus block have demonstrated shorter block onset time and longer anaesthesia duration [9,10,11,12,13,14,15], other studies have found contrasting results [16,17].
However, all of the aforementioned studies comparing block onset time and duration following the perineural injection of clonidine and local anaesthetic admixture used both conventional volumes and techniques for locating nerves. A question arises as to the effect of clonidine as an adjuvant to local anaesthetics in the context of ultrasound guidance and relatively lower volumes as per current practice.
In this prospective study, we set out to evaluate the effects of adding both clonidine and epinephrine to lidocaine 2% on the block onset time and the duration of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. We hypothesised that using a 20 mL mixture of lidocaine 2% plus epinephrine 1:200,000 combined with clonidine 1 µg/kg would shorten the onset time of sensory block when compared to lidocaine 2% plus epinephrine 1:200,000 in ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block (USgABPB) for upper limb trauma surgery.

2. Materials and Methods

This prospective, randomised, single-centre study was approved by The Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Cork Teaching Hospitals (ECM 4(aa) 04/03/14, Chairperson Professor Michael G Molloy), registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (accessed on 5 July 2017) (NCT03207022), and conducted at Cork University Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all eligible participants. Twenty-four patients aged 18 years of age or older, ASA grade I-III;, undergoing unilateral upper limb surgeries of the forearm and hand, were recruited to the study. The exclusion criteria were contraindication to regional anaesthesia, hypersensitivity to amide local anaesthetics or clonidine, intolerance or contraindication to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, BMI > 35, pregnancy, cardiac conduction abnormalities, history of hepatic or renal failure, and neurological or neuromuscular disease.
On arrival to the anaesthesia induction room, an intravenous cannula was placed in the forearm contralateral to the surgical site, and standard monitors were applied. Using a computer-generated sequence of random numbers and a sealed envelope technique, the patients were randomised to one of two groups to receive USgABPB with 20 mL of lidocaine 2% plus 1:200,000 epinephrine combined with either 2 mL of normal saline 0.9% (Group 1) or 2 mL of an admixture of clonidine 1 µg/kg and normal saline 0.9% (Group 2). The patients were not made aware of group allocation. All of the blocks were performed by an experienced anaesthesiologist skilled in USgABPB and who was blinded to the group allocation, which ensured uniformity in the deposition of the local anaesthetic solution. The patients were positioned supine with the operative arm abducted and externally rotated with the elbow flexed at 90°. Under aseptic precautions, the axillary brachial plexus block was performed under ultrasound guidance alone using a SonoSite Titan unit (SonoSite®, Bothwell, WA, USA) with a 38 mm linear array 5–10 MHz transducer (L38). All four terminal branches, the median, ulnar, radial, and musculocutaneous nerves were identified in the axillary region. A 24-gauge, 50 mm, insulated short bevel needle (Stimuplex® B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) was advanced in-plane until the needle tip was placed adjacent to the nerve before the local anaesthetic was injected to produce a circumferential spread around each target nerve. The total volume of the local anaesthetic solution corresponding to the study group was equally distributed among the four nerves.
Sensory and motor blockade was evaluated after completion of the injection by an independent observer not aware of group allocation. Assessment of sensory and motor block onset in the innervation area of each nerve (median, ulnar, radial, and musculocutaneous nerve) were conducted every 2.5 min until surgical anaesthesia was achieved or after 30 min had elapsed. Sensory function was scored as being present or absent, and motor function was graded using the modified Bromage Scale (Table 1) [18]. Surgical anaesthesia was defined as a motor score ≤ 2 with an absent sensation to cold (tested with ethyl chloride BP, Cryogesic®, Dr Georg Friedrich Henning, Chemische Fabrik Walldorf GmbH, Walldorf, Germany). Each nerve distribution area was individually assessed, and the sensory and motor onset time was measured separately from the conclusion of the block (removal of block needle, T0) to the attainment of an absent sensation to cold and a motor score ≤ 2, respectively. The overall sensory and motor block onset time was taken from T0 to the attainment of surgical anaesthesia in all innervation territories. If surgical anaesthesia had not been achieved at 30 min in one or more of the four nerve distribution areas, a rescue block or general anaesthesia was planned. Any patients with discomfort or pain during surgery requiring supplementation of infiltration by surgeons or requiring opiate analgesia were considered block failure, and data from these patients were analysed separately. In case of patient anxiety or upon request, sedation with midazolam to a maximum of 3 mg was provided. All patients received paracetamol 1 g and diclofenac sodium 75 mg iv intraoperatively. Heart rate, blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, and sedation score on a five-point scale (0 = wide awake, 1 = drowsy, 2 = dozing intermittently, 3 = mostly asleep, and 4= only aroused by tactile stimulation) were recorded every 5 min intraoperatively and every 30 min postoperatively until the resolution of the block. Hypotension and bradycardia, defined as a 20% fall in blood pressure and heart rate, respectively, in relation to pre-block baseline values and any episodes of Spo2 equal to or less than 90% associated with sedation requiring oxygen supplementation by venturi mask were noted.
Postoperatively, the duration of the sensory and motor block of each nerve was evaluated every 15 min by an independent observer. The time interval was taken from the completion of the block procedure to the return of sensation to cold and motor power (score ≥ 3), respectively. Postoperative analgesia consisted of regular paracetamol 1 g po every 6 h, diclofenac 75 mg po every 12 h, and rescue analgesia was offered in the form of oxycodone 10 mg orally every 4–6 as required.
The primary outcome was the overall onset of sensory block, which was defined as the time elapsed from the conclusion of the block (T0) until the attainment of sensory block in all four nerve distribution areas. Similarly, the overall onset of motor block was defined as the time interval from T0 to the attainment of motor power (score ≤ 2) in all four nerve distribution areas. Secondary outcome measures included the overall onset of the motor block, the onset of the sensory and motor block for individual nerves, the overall duration of the sensory and motor block, the time to the first request for postoperative opioid analgesia, and the incidence of adverse effects perioperatively.

Sample Size and Statistical Analysis

The sample size was calculated based on the onset of sensory block as the primary outcome parameter. Kaabachi et al. [19] found a mean onset of sensory block of 9 (SD ± 3) min following an axillary brachial block performed with 30 mL lidocaine 1.5%. The minimum sample size required to have an 80% probability of detecting a 40% decrease in onset time (level of significance 0.05) was nine patients per group. We recruited 12 patients per group to account for potential dropouts.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 24 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The Shapiro–Wilk test was used for normality testing. Continuous, normally distributed data are presented as mean (SD), and non-normally distributed data are presented as median (interquartile range (IQR)). Comparisons between the groups were analysed using the unpaired Student’s t test for normally distributed data, and nonparametric data were analysed with the Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared between groups using Pearson’s or Fischer’s exact test. All tests were 2-tailed, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Twenty-four patients (12 in each group) were recruited to the study from April 2014 to January 2015. All patients completed the study (Figure 1), and none of the patients required rescue block, conversion to general anaesthesia, supplementation by surgeons, or intraoperative opioid analgesia. The patient demographic characteristics were similar between the groups (Table 2). The overall onset of sensory and motor block was significantly shorter in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (Table 3). This was also noted in the individual nerve block onset times, with the exception of musculocutaneous motor block. The overall duration of the sensory and motor block was significantly longer in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (Table 4). In addition, the overall duration of both the sensory and motor blocks of individual nerves were also longer in Group 2. Figure 2 depicts the primary outcome measure, which is the overall onset of sensory block.
Haemodynamic parameters (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5), peripheral oxygen saturation, and sedation score showed no significant differences between the groups. In seven patients, the highest sedation score was one, four of whom were in Group 1, and three of whom were in Group 2, during the intraoperative period, which corresponded to receiving midazolam for anxiety. There were no systemic adverse events noted in either group. Twelve patients, eight in Group 1 and four in Group 2, requested additional opiate analgesia postoperatively. The median (IQR) time to the first request for postoperative opioid analgesia was longer in Group 2 at 318 (303–469) min compared to 209 (166–268) min in Group 1 (p = 0.04).

4. Discussion

This study demonstrated that adding clonidine to lidocaine with epinephrine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block resulted in shorter overall onset time, prolonged duration of both sensory and motor block, and prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia. Our results are similar to previous findings, whereby clonidine added to local anaesthetics in conventional axillary brachial plexus block shortened block onset time [9,10,11,12] and prolonged the duration of anaesthesia and analgesia following the conclusion of the blocks [9,10,11,12,13,14]. In contrast to earlier studies, we performed all of the blocks solely under ultrasound guidance, ensuring uniformity in the deposition of local anaesthetic around all four terminal nerves, thus minimising the differences associated with the technique.
The use of lidocaine, a local anaesthetic with a moderate duration of action, allowed the detection of any effects attributable to clonidine in the postoperative period. The dose of 1 µg/kg of clonidine was chosen based on previous reports [10,14]. Doses of up to 150 µg have been used with minimal side effects [20,21]. In a dose finding study, Bernard et al. demonstrated that the addition of clonidine to lidocaine 1% resulted in a more pronounced sensory blockade as well as in a dose-dependent prolongation of analgesia [10]. They concluded that 30 to 90 µg clonidine improved the nerve block quality while limiting the side effects. Similarly, Iohom et al. [11] demonstrated that the addition of clonidine to mepivacaine in an axillary brachial plexus block led to a decrease in sensory block onset time and an increase in the duration of anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia. More recently Hrishi et al. [22] found that clonidine added to a mixture of bupivacaine and lidocaine shortened the onset time and prolonged the duration of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block. Of note, the heterogeneity of nerve stimulation (single or multiple) or the dual ultrasound plus nerve stimulation-based block techniques used may have influenced the spread of the local anaesthetic within the brachial plexus sheath and the subsequent block characteristics.
The addition of clonidine to local anaesthetics for brachial plexus block has been found to be efficacious when compared to the systemic administration of similar doses in prolonging the block duration and postoperative analgesia, suggesting a local mechanism of action of clonidine [23,24]. However, the precise mechanism of how clonidine exerts its action remains speculative. Several theories have been postulated, including one that states that that clonidine with selective α2 adrenoreceptor agonist and weak α1 agonist activity causes vasoconstriction by postsynaptic adrenoreceptor activation [25,26,27], thus prolonging block duration by reducing the vascular absorption of local anaesthetic mixtures. Other studies have not supported those results [16,28] and have hypothesised that clonidine may have a direct effect on nerve fiber conduction, mainly in A alpha and C fibres [29,30,31]. Despite this observed effect, clonidine alone has been shown to be incapable of producing analgesia when injected into the axillary brachial plexus sheath [32].
In the present study, all of the patients received lidocaine with epinephrine, which produces marked vasoconstriction when used alone. Whether this effect is further enhanced or prolonged by the addition of clonidine remains unknown. It is likely that the prolongation of local anaesthetic block occurs due to a combination of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects on local anaesthetic actions [33].
Our study is limited by the moderate sample size. As it was not designed to elucidate the mechanism of action of clonidine, the study did not include a systemic clonidine group. This study adds to the body of evidence supporting the use of clonidine as an adjuvant to local anaesthetics in improving the efficacy and characteristics of peripheral nerve blocks.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, an admixture of clonidine 1 µg/kg to lidocaine with epinephrine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block resulted in the shorter onset time and the longer duration of both sensory and motor block as well as longer time until the first request for postoperative analgesia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R. and G.I.; methodology, A.R. and T.H.; software, A.R.; validation, A.R. and G.I.; formal analysis, A.R., T.H. and G.I.; investigation, A.R. and G.I.; resources, A.R. and G.I.; data curation, A.R. and T.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R.; writing—review and editing, G.I.; visualization, A.R. and G.I.; supervision, G.I.; project administration, G.I.; funding acquisition, A.R. and G.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Departmental funding only.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Clinical Research Ethics Committee, University College Cork, Ireland.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Hard copies of the data details are available in the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Cork University Hospital, Ireland.

Acknowledgments

We thank Bahman Honsari for providing his statistical expertise.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bazin, J.E.; Massoni, C.; Bruelle, P.; Fenies, V.; Groslier, D.; Schoeffler, P. The addition of opioids to local anaesthetics in brachial plexus block: The comparative effects of morphine, buprenorphine and sufentanil. Anaesthesia 1997, 52, 858–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Candido, K.D.; Winnie, A.P.; Ghaleb, A.H.; Fattouh, M.W.; Franco, C.D. Buprenorphine added to the local anesthetic for axillary brachial plexus block prolongs postoperative analgesia. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2002, 27, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dogru, K.; Duygulu, F.; Yildiz, K.; Kotanoglu, M.S.; Madenoglu, H.; Boyaci, A. Hemodynamic and blockade effects of high/low epinephrine doses during axillary brachial plexus blockade with lidocaine 1.5%: A randomized, double-blinded study. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2003, 28, 401–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Iskandar, H.; Guillaume, E.; Dixmérias, F.; Binje, B.; Rakotondriamihary, S.; Thiebaut, R.; Maurette, P. The enhancement of sensory blockade by clonidine selectively added to mepivacaine after midhumeral block. Anesth. Analg. 2001, 93, 771–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Patacsil, J.A.; McAuliffe, M.S.; Feyh, L.S.; Sigmon, L.L. Local Anesthetic Adjuvants Providing the Longest Duration of Analgesia for Single- Injection Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Orthopedic Surgery: A Literature Review. AANA J. 2016, 84, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Prabhakar, A.; Lambert, T.; Kaye, R.J.; Gaignard, S.M.; Ragusa, J.; Wheat, S.; Moll, V.; Cornett, E.M.; Urman, R.D.; Kaye, A.D. Adjuvants in clinical regional anesthesia practice: A comprehensive review. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 2019, 33, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. El-Boghdadly, K.; Brull, R.; Sehmbi, H.; Abdallah, F.W. Perineural Dexmedetomidine Is More Effective Than Clonidine When Added to Local Anesthetic for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesth. Analg. 2017, 124, 2008–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vorobeichik, L.; Brull, R.; Abdallah, F.W. Evidence basis for using perineural dexmedetomidine to enhance the quality of brachial plexus nerve blocks: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br. J. Anaesth. 2017, 118, 167–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Chawda, P.M.; Sharma, G. A clinical study comparing epinephrine 200 μg or clonidine 90 μg as adjuvants to local anaesthetic agent in brachial plexus block via supraclavicular approach. J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol. 2010, 26, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Bernard, J.M.; Macaire, P. Dose-range effects of clonidine added to lidocaine for brachial plexus block. Anesthesiology 1997, 87, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Iohom, G.; Machmachi, A.; Diarra, D.P.; Khatouf, M.; Boileau, S.; Dap, F.; Boini, S.; Mertes, P.-M.; Bouaziz, H. The effects of clonidine added to mepivacaine for paronychia surgery under axillary brachial plexus block. Anesth. Analg. 2005, 100, 1179–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Antonucci, S. Adiuvants in the axillary brachial plexus blockade. Comparison between clonidine, sufentanil and tramadol. Minerva Anestesiol. 2001, 67, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Erlacher, W.; Schuschnig, C.; Koinig, H.; Marhofer, P.; Melischek, M.; Mayer, N.; Kapral, S. Clonidine as adjuvant for mepivacaine, ropivacaine and bupivacaine in axillary, perivascular brachial plexus block. Can. J. Anaesth. J. Can. D’anesthesie 2001, 48, 522–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Singelyn, F.J.; Gouverneur, J.M.; Robert, A. A minimum dose of clonidine added to mepivacaine prolongs the duration of anesthesia and analgesia after axillary brachial plexus block. Anesth. Analg. 1996, 83, 1046–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Eledjam, J.J.; Deschodt, J.; Viel, E.J.; Lubrano, J.F.; Charavel, P.; d’Athis, F.; Du Cailar, J. Brachial plexus block with bupivacaine: Effects of added alpha-adrenergic agonists: Comparison between clonidine and epinephrine. Can. J. Anaesth. J. Can. D’anesthesie 1991, 38, 870–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Gaumann, D.; Forster, A.; Griessen, M.; Habre, W.; Poinsot, O.; Della Santa, D. Comparison between clonidine and epinephrine admixture to lidocaine in brachial plexus block. Anesth. Analg. 1992, 75, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Erlacher, W.; Schuschnig, C.; Orlicek, F.; Marhofer, P.; Koinig, H.; Kapral, S. The effects of clonidine on ropivacaine 0.75% in axillary perivascular brachial plexus block. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2000, 44, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. O’Donnell, B.D.; Iohom, G. An estimation of the minimum effective anesthetic volume of 2% lidocaine in ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Anesthesiology 2009, 111, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kaabachi, O.; Ouezini, R.; Koubaa, W.; Ghrab, B.; Zargouni, A.; Ben Abdelaziz, A. Tramadol as an adjuvant to lidocaine for axillary brachial plexus block. Anesth. Analg. 2009, 108, 367–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Murphy, D.B.; McCartney, C.J.; Chan, V.W. Novel analgesic adjuncts for brachial plexus block: A systematic review. Anesth. Analg. 2000, 90, 1122–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. McCartney, C.J.; Duggan, E.; Apatu, E. Should we add clonidine to local anesthetic for peripheral nerve blockade? A qualitative systematic review of the literature. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2007, 32, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hrishi, A.P.; Rao, G.; Lionel, K.R. Efficacy of Clonidine as an Additive on the Duration of Action of Brachial Plexus Block Performed Under Ultrasound and Nerve Locator Guidance: A Prospective Randomized Study. Anesth. Essays Res. 2019, 13, 105–110. [Google Scholar]
  23. Singelyn, F.J.; Dangoisse, M.; Bartholomée, S.; Gouverneur, J.M. Adding clonidine to mepivacaine prolongs the duration of anesthesia and analgesia after axillary brachial plexus block. Reg. Anesth. 1992, 17, 148–150. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hutschala, D.; Mascher, H.; Schmetterer, L.; Klimscha, W.; Fleck, T.; Eichler, H.G.; Tschernko, E.M. Clonidine added to bupivacaine enhances and prolongs analgesia after brachial plexus block via a local mechanism in healthy volunteers. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2004, 21, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Maze, M.; Tranquilli, W. Alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists: Defining the role in clinical anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1991, 74, 581–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Matthews, W.D.; Jim, K.F.; Hieble, J.P.; DeMarinis, R.M. Postsynaptic alpha adrenoceptors on vascular smooth muscle. Fed. Proc. 1984, 43, 2923–2928. [Google Scholar]
  27. Langer, S.Z.; Duval, N.; Massingham, R. Pharmacologic and therapeutic significance of alpha-adrenoceptor subtypes. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 1985, 7 (Suppl. 8), S1–S8. [Google Scholar]
  28. Molnar, R.R.; Davies, M.J.; Scott, D.A.; Silbert, B.S.; Mooney, P.H. Comparison of clonidine and epinephrine in lidocaine for cervical plexus block. Reg. Anesth. 1997, 22, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Gaumann, D.M.; Brunet, P.C.; Jirounek, P. Clonidine enhances the effects of lidocaine on C-fiber action potential. Anesth. Analg. 1992, 74, 719–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Butterworth, J.F.; Strichartz, G.R. The alpha 2-adrenergic agonists clonidine and guanfacine produce tonic and phasic block of conduction in rat sciatic nerve fibers. Anesth. Analg. 1993, 76, 295–301. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kroin, J.S.; Buvanendran, A.; Beck, D.R.; Topic, J.E.; Watts, D.E.; Tuman, K.J. Clonidine prolongation of lidocaine analgesia after sciatic nerve block in rats Is mediated via the hyperpolarization-activated cation current, not by alpha-adrenoreceptors. Anesthesiology 2004, 101, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sia, S.; Lepri, A. Clonidine administered as an axillary block does not affect postoperative pain when given as the sole analgesic. Anesth. Analg. 1999, 88, 1109–1112. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Kopacz, D.J.; Bernards, C.M. Effect of clonidine on lidocaine clearance in vivo: A microdialysis study in humans. Anesthesiology 2001, 95, 1371–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 10 04181 g001 550
Figure 1. CONSORT patient flow diagram. n = number.
Figure 1. CONSORT patient flow diagram. n = number.
Jcm 10 04181 g001
Jcm 10 04181 g002 550
Figure 2. Overall onset of sensory block.
Figure 2. Overall onset of sensory block.
Jcm 10 04181 g002
Jcm 10 04181 g003 550
Figure 3. Systolic blood pressure changes (SBP). The line graphs represent the mean and standard deviation in Group 1 and Group 2.
Figure 3. Systolic blood pressure changes (SBP). The line graphs represent the mean and standard deviation in Group 1 and Group 2.
Jcm 10 04181 g003
Jcm 10 04181 g004 550
Figure 4. Diastolic blood pressure changes (DBP). The line graphs represent the mean and standard deviation in Group 1 and Group 2.
Figure 4. Diastolic blood pressure changes (DBP). The line graphs represent the mean and standard deviation in Group 1 and Group 2.
Jcm 10 04181 g004
Jcm 10 04181 g005 550
Figure 5. Heart reate changes. The line graphs represent the mean and standard deviation in group 1 and 2.
Figure 5. Heart reate changes. The line graphs represent the mean and standard deviation in group 1 and 2.
Jcm 10 04181 g005
Table
Table 1. Motor and sensory testing.
Table 1. Motor and sensory testing.
Motor TestSensory Test
MedianFlexion of radial 3 fingersThenar eminence
RadialExtension of wristDorsum of hand
UlnarAbduction of fingersHypothenar eminence
MusculocutaneousElbow flexionOver base first metacarpal
Modified Bromage Scale
Score and definition
4 Full power in relevant muscle.
3 Reduced power but ability to move muscle against resistance
2 Ability to move relevant muscle group against gravity but not against resistance
1 Flicker of movement in relevant muscle group
0 No movement in relevant muscle group
Table
Table 2. Patient characteristics.
Table 2. Patient characteristics.
Group 1
n = 12		Group 2
n = 12		p Value
Age, y41.4 ± 10.642.3 ± 8.60.82
Sex, M/F,7/58/40.67
BMI, Kg/m225.8 ± 1.825.7 ± 2.00.98
ASA grade (I/II/III), n9/3/07/5/00.39
Duration of surgery, min63.9 ± 15.961.8 ± 15.40.74
Site of surgery (Forearm, wrist, hand), n0/10/21/6/5
Continuous variables are presented as means ± SD and categorical variables as counts.
Table
Table 3. Sensory and motor block onset time (min).
Table 3. Sensory and motor block onset time (min).
Group 1
n = 12		Group 2
n = 12		p Value
Overall sensory block 10 (8.8–12.5)5 (5–7.5)<0.001
Overall motor block7.5 (6.3–7.5)5 (2.5–7.5)0.001
Radial nerve
 Sensory block10 (7.5–11.3)5 (3.8–7.5)0.002
 Motor block5 (5–7.5)3.8 (2.5–5]0.014
Ulnar nerve
 Sensory block7.5 (7.5–10)5 (5–6.3)0.005
 Motor block5 (5–7.5)3.75 (2.5–5)0.007
Median nerve
 Sensory block7.5 (5–11.25)5 (5–7.5)0.001
 Motor block5 (5–7.5)3.8 (2.5–5)0.005
Musculocutaneous nerve
 Sensory block7.5 (7.5–8.8)5 (5–6.8)0.003
 Motor block5 (2.5–6.3)2.5 (2.5–5)0.18
Data are presented in minutes; values are median (interquartile range, Q1–Q3).
Table
Table 4. Sensory and motor block duration (min).
Table 4. Sensory and motor block duration (min).
Group 1
n = 12		Group 2
n = 12		p Value
Overall sensory block 168 (148–190)225 (200–231)<0.001
Overall motor block168 (148–186)225 (208–231)<0.001
Radial nerve
 Sensory block175 (148–192)225 (200–231)0.001
 Motor block180 (151–187)225 (208–231)<0.001
Ulnar nerve
 Sensory block182 (156–192)227 (200–241)0.002
 Motor block178 (148–190)226 (211–233)<0.001
Median nerve
 Sensory block180 (156–190)230 (200–241)0.001
 Motor block176 (156–193)225 (215–238)<0.001
Musculocutaneous nerve
 Sensory block180 (156–195)233 (215–241)0.001
 Motor block168 (156–195)225 (215–231)<0.001
Data are presented in minutes; values are median (interquartile range, Q1–Q3).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ranganath, A.; Hitka, T.; Iohom, G. Effects of Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Lidocaine with Epinephrine in Ultrasound Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomised Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184181

AMA Style

Ranganath A, Hitka T, Iohom G. Effects of Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Lidocaine with Epinephrine in Ultrasound Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(18):4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184181

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ranganath, Anil, Tomas Hitka, and Gabriella Iohom. 2021. "Effects of Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Lidocaine with Epinephrine in Ultrasound Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomised Controlled Trial" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 18: 4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184181

APA Style

Ranganath, A., Hitka, T., & Iohom, G. (2021). Effects of Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Lidocaine with Epinephrine in Ultrasound Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(18), 4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184181

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop