Uterine Fundus Remodeling after Hysteroscopic Metroplasty: A Prospective Pilot Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Subjects
2.2. Surgery
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Raga, F.; Bauset, C.; Remohi, J.; Bonilla-Musoles, F.; Simón, C.; Pellicer, A. Reproductive impact of congenital Mullerian anomalies. Hum. Reprod. 1997, 12, 2277–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rikken, J.F.W.; Leeuwis-Fedorovich, N.E.; Letteboer, S.; Emanuel, M.H.; Limpens, J.; van der Veen, F.; Goddijn, M.; van Wely, M. The pathophysiology of the septate uterus: A systematic review. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019, 126, 1192–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saravelos, S.H.; Cocksedge, K.A.; Li, T.C. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: A critical appraisal. Hum. Reprod. Update 2008, 14, 415–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Grimbizis, G.F.; Camus, M.; Tarlatzis, B.C.; Bontis, J.N.; Devroey, P. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum. Reprod. Update 2001, 7, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grimbizis, G.F.; Gordts, S.; Di Spiezio Sardo, A.; Brucker, S.; De Angelis, C.; Gergolet, M.; Li, T.C.; Tanos, V.; Brölmann, H.; Gianaroli, L.; et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum. Reprod. 2013, 28, 2032–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grimbizis, G.F.; Di Spiezio Sardo, A.; Saravelos, S.H.; Gordts, S.; Exacoustos, C.; Van Schoubroeck, D.; Bermejo, C.; Amso, N.N.; Nargund, G.; Timmerman, D.; et al. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Hum. Reprod. 2016, 31, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, Y.Y.; Jayaprakasan, K.; Tan, A.; Thornton, J.G.; Coomarasamy, A.; Raine-Fenning, N.J. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: A systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 38, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strassmann, E.O. Fertility and unification of double uterus. Fertil. Steril. 1966, 17, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edström, K.; Fernström, I. A partly new method of hysteroscopy with possibilities for surgical application. Nord. Med. 1971, 86, 990. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Duncan, G.R.; Weerasinghe, D.S.L. The diagnostic possibilities of a modified hysteroscopic technique. N. Z. Med. J. 1985, 98, 101–103. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Paradisi, R.; Barzanti, R.; Fabbri, R. The techniques and outcomes of hysteroscopic metroplasty. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 26, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rikken, J.F.W.; Verhorstert, K.W.J.; Emanuel, M.H.; Bongers, M.Y.; Spinder, T.; Kuchenbecker, W.; Jansen, F.W.; van der Steeg, J.W.; Janssen, C.A.H.; Kapiteijn, K.; et al. Septum resection in women with a septate uterus: A cohort study. Hum. Reprod. 2020, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alonso Pacheco, L.; Ata, B.; Bettocchi, S.; Campo, R.; Carugno, J.; Checa, M.A.; de Angelis, C.; Di Spiezio Sardo, A.; Donnez, J.; Farrugia, M.; et al. Septate uterus and reproductive outcomes: Let’s get serious about this. Hum. Reprod. 2020, 35, 2627–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bendifallah, S.; Faivre, E.; Legendre, G.; Deffieux, X.; Fernandez, H. Metroplasty for AFS Class V and VI Septate Uterus in Patients With Infertility or Miscarriage: Reproductive Outcomes Study. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2013, 20, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tehraninejad, E.S.; Ghaffari, F.; Jahangiri, N.; Oroomiechiha, M.; Akhoond, M.R.; Aziminekoo, E. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic monopolar metroplasty: An analysis of 203 cases. Int. J. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 7, 175–180. [Google Scholar]
- Valle, R.F.; Ekpo, G.E. Hysteroscopic Metroplasty for the Septate Uterus: Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2013, 20, 22–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tulandi, T.; Akkour, K. Role of reproductive surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2012, 26, 747–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paradisi, R.; Barzanti, R.; Natali, F.; Battaglia, C.; Venturoli, S. Metroplasty in a Large Population of Women with Septate Uterus. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2011, 18, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homer, H.A.; Li, T.C.; Cooke, I.D. The septate uterus: A review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil. Steril. 2000, 73, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rikken, J.F.W.; Kowalik, C.R.; Emanuel, M.H.; Mol, B.W.J.; Van der Veen, F.; van Wely, M.; Goddijn, M. Septum resection for women of reproductive age with a septate uterus. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghi, T.; De Musso, F.; Maroni, E.; Youssef, A.; Savelli, L.; Farina, A.; Casadio, P.; Filicori, M.; Pilu, G.; Rizzo, N. The pregnancy outcome in women with incidental diagnosis of septate uterus at first trimester scan. Hum. Reprod. 2012, 27, 2671–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Venturoli, S.; Colombo, F.M.; Vianello, F.; Seracchioli, R.; Possati, G.; Paradisi, R. A study of hysteroscopic metroplasty in 141 women with a septate uterus. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2002, 266, 157–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Di Spiezio Sardo, A.; Zizolfi, B.; Bettocchi, S.; Exacoustos, C.; Nocera, C.; Nazzaro, G.; da Cunha Vieira, M.; Nappi, C. Accuracy of Hysteroscopic Metroplasty With the Combination of Presurgical 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography and a Novel Graduated Intrauterine Palpator: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2016, 23, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghi, T.; Casadio, P.; Kuleva, M.; Perrone, A.M.; Savelli, L.; Giunchi, S.; Meriggiola, M.C.; Gubbini, G.; Pilu, G.; Pelusi, C.; et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies. Fertil. Steril. 2009, 92, 808–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Detti, L. Ultrasound assessment of uterine cavity remodeling after surgical correction of subseptations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 210, 262.e1–262.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Detti, L.; Hickman, H.; D’Ancona, R.L.; Wright, A.W.; Christiansen, M.E. Relevance of uterine subseptations: What length should warrant hysteroscopic resection? J. Ultrasound Med. 2017, 36, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caliskan, E.; Ozkan, S.; Cakiroglu, Y.; Sarisoy, H.T.; Corakci, A.; Ozeren, S.; Kampusu, U.; Kampusu, U. Diagnostic Accuracy of Real-Time 3D Sonography in the Diagnosis of Congenital Mullerian Anomalies in High-Risk Patients With Respect to the Phase of the Menstrual cycle. J. Clin. Ultrasound 2009, 38, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaucherand, P.; Awada, A.; Rudigoz, R.C.; Dargent, D. Obstetrical prognosis of the septate uterus: A plea for treatment of the septum. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1994, 54, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, L.H.; Li, M.J.; Li, M.; Xu, H.; Wei, Z.L. Not every subseptate uterus requires surgical correction to reduce poor reproductive outcome. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2011, 115, 260–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tonguc, E.A.; Var, T.; Batioglu, S. Hysteroscopic metroplasty in patients with a uterine septum and otherwise unexplained infertility. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2011, 113, 128–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Characteristics | Values |
---|---|
Age (years ± SD) | 30.7 ± 4.18 |
Indications for surgery, n (%) | |
Primary infertility | 47 (78.3) |
Spontaneous abortions | 13 (21.6) |
Type of uterine septum | |
Partial septum | 29 (48.3) |
Complete septum | 31 (51.6) |
Length of the septum, Z (mm ± SD) | 24.9 ± 5.13 |
Thickness of uterine myometrial fundus, X (mm ± SD) | 5.9 ± 1.94 |
Uterine Fundus Before Surgery n (%) | Uterine Fundus at Three Months Follow-Up | All | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Concave | Convex | Flat | ||
Concave | 0 (0%) | 4 (7%) | 9 (15%) | 13 (22%) |
Convex | 0 (0%) | 13 (22%) | 0 (0%) | 13 (22%) |
Flat | 0 (0%) | 22 (36%) | 12 (20%) | 34 (56%) |
All | 0 (0%) | 39 (65%) | 21 (35%) | 60 (100%) |
Uterine Fundus before Surgery n (%) | Uterine Fundus at 3-Month Follow-Up | All | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Concave | Convex | Flat | ||
Concave | 0 (0%) | 2 (5%) | 9 (21%) | 11 (26%) |
Convex | 0 (0%) | 6 (14%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (14%) |
Flat | 0 (0%) | 17 (40%) | 9 (21%) | 26 (60%) |
All | 0 (0%) | 25 (58%) | 18 (42%) | 43 (100%) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Casadio, P.; Magnarelli, G.; La Rosa, M.; Alletto, A.; Arena, A.; Fontana, E.; Morra, C.; Talamo, M.R.; Fabbri, M.; Giovannico, K.; et al. Uterine Fundus Remodeling after Hysteroscopic Metroplasty: A Prospective Pilot Study. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020260
Casadio P, Magnarelli G, La Rosa M, Alletto A, Arena A, Fontana E, Morra C, Talamo MR, Fabbri M, Giovannico K, et al. Uterine Fundus Remodeling after Hysteroscopic Metroplasty: A Prospective Pilot Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(2):260. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020260
Chicago/Turabian StyleCasadio, Paolo, Giulia Magnarelli, Mariangela La Rosa, Andrea Alletto, Alessandro Arena, Enrico Fontana, Ciro Morra, Maria Rita Talamo, Matilde Fabbri, Kevin Giovannico, and et al. 2021. "Uterine Fundus Remodeling after Hysteroscopic Metroplasty: A Prospective Pilot Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 2: 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020260
APA StyleCasadio, P., Magnarelli, G., La Rosa, M., Alletto, A., Arena, A., Fontana, E., Morra, C., Talamo, M. R., Fabbri, M., Giovannico, K., Virgilio, A., Raimondo, D., Guasina, F., Paradisi, R., & Seracchioli, R. (2021). Uterine Fundus Remodeling after Hysteroscopic Metroplasty: A Prospective Pilot Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(2), 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020260