Next Article in Journal
Status and Risk of Noncompliance of Adherence to Medications for Metabolic Diseases According to Occupational Characteristics
Next Article in Special Issue
Lipid, Aqueous and Mucin Tear Film Layer Stability and Permanence within 0.15% Liposome Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid versus 0.15% Non-Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Measured with a Novel Non-Invasive Ocular Surface Analyzer
Previous Article in Journal
A Randomized Pilot Study of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to Improve Social Support for Veterans with PTSD
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Noncontact Tonometry and Icare Rebound Tonometry on Tear Stability and Dry Eye Clinical Practice
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Contact Lenses Loaded with Melatonin Analogs: A Promising Therapeutic Tool against Dry Eye Disease

J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(12), 3483; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123483
by Francisco Javier Navarro-Gil 1,*, Fernando Huete-Toral 2, Carmen Olalla Domínguez-Godínez 1, Gonzalo Carracedo 1 and Almudena Crooke 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(12), 3483; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123483
Submission received: 25 May 2022 / Revised: 11 June 2022 / Accepted: 14 June 2022 / Published: 17 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Dry Eye Disease Treatment)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

General comments:

It was interesting reading the reported study. I congratulate the authors for the innovative ideas of this study. Furthermore, the study was conducted in a precise and sustainable manner. 

Specific comments

Line 155: The Schirmer test is non-specific and varies between individuals. Just so I understand better, it is correct that each rabbit was given a CL without melatonin before the processed CL with melatonin was applied. If so, then that should be more clearly stated. With a completely uncoupled sample group, comparing the Schirmer test becomes more difficult.

Line 170: The Shapiro-Wilks test is very useful to test the distribution of the samples. How were the samples that did not show a normal distribution further processed?

Line 424: Can the control group be precisely defined. As already mentioned above, the Schirmer test is not consistent interindividually and thus the absolute values are not always easy to compare. This should also be mentioned.

Line 588: It was rightly mentioned that the clinical results from rabbits cannot simply be transferred to humans. However, this is often the first step in obtaining a reliable evaluation. However, some questions should be mentioned in the discussion. What is the potential clinical hazard of melatonin at this concentration on corneal epithelial cells? What is the biocompatibility of melatonin on CL? Are allergies to be expected? Is trophic disturbance of the corneal tissue to be expected? Another important point is what would a clinical trial in humans look like? How long would the CLs have to be worn?

Line 598: It should be mentioned that melatonin treatment tends to improve the aqueous phase of the tear film. This would certainly help patients with Sjögren's syndrome. However, most dry eye patients suffer from meibomian gland dysfunction.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper “Contact Lenses loaded with melatonin analogs: a promising 2 therapeutic tool against Dry Eye Disease”, reported an interesting topic about  the in vitro ability of five commercially available hydrogels CLs to act as a delivery system for melatonin analogs and the in vivo secretagogue effect of melatonin analogs-loaded CLs.

I agree with the limitation of this study regarding the the eye toxicity of the compounds of melatonin and thus its analogs in eye diseases.

Only few specific concerns: 

Please add in the introduction section more informations about the role of Melatonin  as a neurohormone involved in the regulation of tear and aqueous humor production and the associated physiological processes.

Lines 80-84 of the introduction section are part of the results/discussion section. Therefore, please remove this part from introduction and add it in the results section. In the final part of introduction please add the aim of the study.

Lines 580-581 lines: Please add more information about the possible side effect. 

Please add a previous reference https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14051019

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop