Next Article in Journal
Far-Infrared Therapy Improves Arteriovenous Fistula Patency and Decreases Plasma Asymmetric Dimethylarginine in Patients with Advanced Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Journal
The Value of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Predicting the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association of Dry Eye Diseases and Auditory Sensitivity

1
Department of Ophthalmology, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 07442, Korea
2
Hallym BioEyeTech Research Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 07442, Korea
3
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 07442, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(14), 4171; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144171
Submission received: 19 April 2022 / Revised: 28 June 2022 / Accepted: 16 July 2022 / Published: 18 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)

Abstract

:
This study aimed to evaluate the association between dry eye and inner ear diseases in a Korean population. Methods: Data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey (KNHANES V, 2010–2012), a national cross-sectional health examination and survey, were collected by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The association between dry eye and inner ear disease was determined using the chi-square test and logistic regression analysis. The individuals were divided into two age groups (<60 and ≥60 years). Results: In total, 17,542 individuals (n = 11,932 in the <60 years group and n = 5610 in the ≥60 years group) were enrolled. After adjusting for confounding factors, the logistic regression model revealed that the associated factors were dizziness and loss of balance experience (OR, 1.315; 95% CI, 1.143–1.513), self-awareness of abnormal voice (OR, 1.372; 95% CI, 1.120–1.679), subjective hearing discomfort (OR, 1.278; CI, 1.084–1.506), and tinnitus (OR, 1.265; 95% CI, 1.101–1.453). The inversely associated factor for dry eye was bilateral hearing loss (OR, 0.497; 95% CI, 0.367–0.672). The hearing threshold was lower in the dry eye group than in the non-dry eye group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Tinnitus was associated with dry eye and bilateral hearing loss was inversely associated with dry eye. These results suggest that hypersensitivity of the senses and nerves, which is neuropathic hyperesthesia, is one of the main mechanisms of dry eye. Treatment of neuropathy may help in treating dry eye associated with dizziness or tinnitus.

1. Introduction

Dry eye is a common disease, with a prevalence of 5–50% [1,2]. Dry eye is characterized by symptoms such as pain, burning sensation, cold sensitivity, and foreign body sensation, which are caused by tear film instability, decreased tear secretion, and increased tear evaporation [2,3]. Although inflammation, oxidative stress, and endoplasmic reticulum stress have been reported to contribute to dry eye, neuropathic theory has been proposed as one of the pathogeneses of dry eye [4,5,6,7]. Ocular neuropathic pain is a condition in which pain is felt with or without normal stimuli [8]. Age-related dry eye disease is associated with corneal nerve fiber attrition, caused by an increased sensitivity or corneal hyperalgesia to tear evaporation [4,9,10]. The subepithelial nerves of the cornea are thicker [11], and the corneal sub-basal nerves show increased tortuosity, number of beadings, and width in dry eye patients [12], which supports the neuropathic theory of dry eye.
Neuropathic mechanisms include hypersensitivity of the peripheral nerve to normal sensations, experiencing non-existent sensations, and perception of sensations to be suppressed in the central nervous system [13,14]. Tinnitus is the perception of sound in the absence of an external sound stimulus [15]. It has neuropathic causes and is similar to neuropathic pain [16]. Conversely, hearing loss is a disease that entails the development of insensitivity to external sounds and has rarely neuropathic causes [17,18]. Although the relationship between hearing loss and glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration has been described [19], the relationship between inner ear diseases and dry eye has not been reported. However, dry eye may be associated with hearing sensitivity or tinnitus, because both dry eye and tinnitus are associated with neuropathic sensations. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between dry eye and hearing loss and tinnitus.

2. Materials and Methods

The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and all participants provided written informed consent. This study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved from IRB approval by the institutional review board of Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital.
For this cross-sectional, population-based study, we used data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey V (2010–2012), a series of cross-sectional surveys of nationally representative samples of the civilian Korean population, conducted annually to assess the health and nutritional status of the South Korean population. To obtain representative samples, KNHANES uses a stratified, multistage, cluster probability sampling design according to geographical area, age, and sex. For the health interview survey, a trained interviewer asked questions directly to individuals aged ≥19 years old. This study included 17,542 adults (7434 men and 10,108 women) aged ≥19 years who met the eligibility criteria, completed a questionnaire regarding independent risk factors, and underwent slit-lamp examinations.
Dry eye was evaluated by ophthalmologist. The subjects were asked whether they were diagnosed with dry eye by an ophthalmologist as like the interview about whether thyroid disorder or heart diseases was diagnosed. Interview was conducted by ophthalmologists. Risk factor analysis using this type of dry eye diagnosis by KHANES has been reported in a lot of studies [20,21,22,23]. Data collected from the 2010 to 2012 KNHANES were analyzed in the present study. Unmatched or untested responses (untested) were excluded (Figure 1). The population was divided according to age: young (<60 years) or older (≥60 years). The participants were asked whether they had been diagnosed with dry eye, dizziness, loss of balance, severe dizziness, falls, self-awareness of abnormal voice, period of voice abnormality, subjective hearing discomfort, hearing aid or artificial cochlear implant use, tinnitus, and discomfort due to the tinnitus. The ears of participants were examined using a 4 mm 0° angled rigid endoscope attached to a charge-coupled device camera to find tympanic membrane perforation or cholesteatoma, retraction pocket, otitis media with effusion or abnormal external auditory canal. Only one ear was evaluated to exclude the possibility of statistical duplication.
Pure-tone audiometric testing was conducted using an SA 203 audiometer (Entomed, Malmö, Sweden). All audiometric tests were performed in a soundproof booth inside a mobile bus reserved for the KNHANES under the supervision of an otolaryngologist. The lowest level at which the participant responded to 50% of the pure tone was set as the threshold. The tested frequency ranges were 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 kHz. Hearing loss was categorized as unilateral or bilateral. Unilateral hearing loss was defined as hearing loss at a threshold of ≥25 dBHL in the ear with worse hearing, and bilateral hearing loss as hearing loss at ≥25 dBHL in the ear with better hearing.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Version 27.0 (SPSS Inc., IBM Software, Portsmouth, UK), and two-sided p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The chi-square test was used to compare discrete variables between the groups. The percentage (%) differences were calculated as the absolute value of the change in value divided by the average of the two numbers, all multiplied by 100. To estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of dry eye and potential factors, we conducted logistic regression analyses using a generalized linear model for a complex survey design. The ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in the following ways: confounder adjustment for age and sex.

3. Results

3.1. General Characteristics

The characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. The Pearson χ2 test showed significant differences in dizziness and loss of balance (p < 0.001), self-awareness of abnormal voice (p < 0.001), subjective hearing discomfort (p = 0.002), tinnitus (p < 0.001), tympanic membrane of the left ear (p = 0.030), and bilateral hearing loss (p < 0.001) in dry eye.

3.2. Factors Associated with Dry Eye

Table 2 shows the logistic regression analysis between dry eye and potential risk factors, adjusted for age and sex. The analysis showed that the risk factors for dry eye included dizziness and loss of balance (OR, 1.355; 95% CI, 1.188–1.546), self-awareness of abnormal voice (OR, 1.453; 95% CI, 1.222–1.727), subjective hearing discomfort (OR, 1.294; 95% CI, 1.118–1.498), and tinnitus (OR, 1.381; 95% CI, 1.236–1.543). Bilateral hearing loss (OR, 0.597; 95% CI, 0.452–0.790) was a protective factor against dry eye.
In the logistic regression analysis between dry eye and potential risk factors adjusted for age, sex, dizziness, loss of balance, self-awareness of abnormal voices, subjective hearing discomfort, tinnitus, and bilateral hearing loss (Table 3), the risk factors for dry eye included dizziness and loss of balance (OR, 1.315; 95% CI, 1.143–1.513), self-awareness of abnormal voices (OR, 1.372; 95% CI, 1.120–1.679), subjective hearing discomfort (OR, 1.278; 95% CI, 1.084–1.506), and tinnitus (OR, 1.265; 95% CI, 1.101–1.453). The protective factor for dry eye was bilateral hearing loss (odds ratio (OR), 0.497; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.367–0.672). Table 4 shows the auditory thresholds for dry eye. They were lower in patients with dry eye at 3000 Hz or more in the right ear and at all frequency ranges in the left eye.

4. Discussion

Dry eye is mainly caused by decreased tear volume and increased evaporation [24]. Risk factors for dry eye, old age, female sex, menopause, obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, depression, and sleep disturbances have been described [1,25,26,27]. In this study, dizziness and loss of balance, self-awareness of abnormal voice, and tinnitus, which are associated with the inner ear [28], were identified as new risk factors. These results suggest that abnormalities in the inner ear are related to dry eye. The cochlea of the inner ear comprises a hollow bone shaped like a snail and is divided into two chambers by a membrane [29]. The chambers of the cochlea are filled with fluid, which vibrates when sound comes in, and 30,000 tiny hairs [29]. Fluid composition is delicately controlled, and changes in surface tension or composition of this fluid may cause abnormal signals or inflammation [30], which is reminiscent of the relationship between tears and the ocular surface.
Diseases of the inner ear, including dizziness, loss of balance, self-awareness of abnormal voice, and tinnitus, may contribute to the pathogenesis with dry eye. Dizziness and loss of balance indicate disturbances or inflammation of the inner ear, such as labyrinthitis or vestibular neuritis [31,32]. Neuroinflammation and neuropathy, which are associated with dizziness, reportedly play critical roles in dry eye [33,34,35]. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, a systemic inflammatory marker, is high in both peripheral vertigo and dry eye [36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. Self-awareness of an abnormal voice may be due to the fact of vocal problems, conduction disorders, or inner-ear problems. Recently, it was reported that laryngopharyngeal reflux disease is associated with dry eye and pepsin was detected in tears [43]. The laryngopharyngeal reflux disease may contribute to self-awareness of an abnormal voice as laryngopharyngeal inflammation.
The possible mechanisms of the association between dry eye and tinnitus can be suggested as follows. First, both dry eye and tinnitus may have common causes, such as neuropathy or neuroinflammation. Neuropathic causes are important in dry eye [35,44,45], and tinnitus is associated with chronic neuropathic pain [46,47]. Chronic dry eye induces corneal hypersensitivity, neuroinflammatory responses, and synaptic plasticity in the mouse trigeminal brainstem [34]. Tinnitus may be caused by abnormal neural activity generated in the brain without the involvement of the ear [15,30]. Phantom sensations in tinnitus are similar to those in ocular neuropathic pain. Second, sleep disturbance due to the fact of tinnitus may have caused dry eye, because sleep disorders are an important risk factor for dry eye [48,49,50]. Sleep apnea accompanied with laryngopharyngeal reflux also may affect to dry eye [43,51]. Sleep disorders are associated with both tinnitus and dry eye [48,49,50,52,53]. Third, tinnitus can lead to high levels of stress, anxiety, and depression [54,55], and medication for these psychological problems may cause dry eye [56]. Fourth, the systemic hypersensitivity of sensations may result in both dry eye and tinnitus. In this study, the auditory threshold was lower in dry eyes, especially at high frequencies, indicating that patients with dry eye syndrome were more sensitive to sound. In dry eye, the sensory threshold is lowered, resulting in sensory and nerve hypersensitivity and potentially causing abnormal nociception and neuropathic symptoms on the ocular surface.
Conversely, bilateral hearing loss was inversely associated with dry eye. The causes of bilateral hearing loss include age, noise exposure, heredity, and medication [57]. The neuropathic causes of bilateral hearing loss are rare [18]. Unilateral hearing loss was not associated with dry eye, which may be because unilateral hearing loss may be associated with head trauma or injury, acoustic neuroma, or viral or bacterial infections [57].
The limitations of this study are that this study was conducted in Korean adults older than 19 years and dry eye diagnosis was assessed by interviews without objective examination of ocular surface and tear film. However, dry eye was evaluated by ophthalmologists. There have been a lot of studies reporting risk factor analysis using this type of dry eye diagnosis by KHANES [20,21,22,23]. Further study is necessary to include cross-sectional study design or cohort study design.

5. Conclusions

Tinnitus is associated with dry eye, whereas bilateral hearing loss is inversely associated with dry eye. The hearing threshold was lower in the dry eye group. These results suggest that hypersensitivity of the senses and nerves, which is a neuropathic hyperesthesia, is the primary mechanism of dry eye. Treatment of neuropathy may help treat dry eye syndrome associated with dizziness or tinnitus.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C. and Y.J.S.; methodology and software, K.W.K. and Y.J.S.; validation. and formal analysis, J.C. and Y.J.S.; investigation and resources, J.S.H. and Y.J.S.; data curation, J.S.H. and Y.J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, K.W.K., J.S.H. and Y.J.S.; writing—review and editing, J.C. and Y.J.S.; visualization, K.W.K. and J.S.H.; supervision, Y.J.S.; project administration, J.C. and Y.J.S.; funding acquisition, Y.J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Hallym University Medical Center Research Fund and Hallym University Research Fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital (Approval number: 2022-01-019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All the data utilized in this study are publicly available through the KNHANES website (http://knhanes.cdc.go.kr, accessed on 14 July 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stapleton, F.; Alves, M.; Bunya, V.Y.; Jalbert, I.; Lekhanont, K.; Malet, F.; Na, K.S.; Schaumberg, D.; Uchino, M.; Vehof, J.; et al. TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report. Ocul. Surf. 2017, 15, 334–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gayton, J.L. Etiology, prevalence, and treatment of dry eye disease. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2009, 3, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Messmer, E.M. The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of dry eye disease. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2015, 112, 71–81. quiz pl82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Galor, A. Painful Dry Eye Symptoms: A Nerve Problem or a Tear Problem? Ophthalmology 2019, 126, 648–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Seen, S.; Tong, L. Dry eye disease and oxidative stress. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018, 96, e412–e420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. de Souza, R.G.; Yu, Z.; Hernandez, H.; Trujillo-Vargas, C.M.; Lee, A.; Mauk, K.E.; Cai, J.; Alves, M.R.; de Paiva, C.S. Modulation of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in the Aged Lacrimal Gland. Am. J. Pathol. 2021, 191, 294–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kroeger, H.; Chiang, W.C.; Felden, J.; Nguyen, A.; Lin, J.H. ER stress and unfolded protein response in ocular health and disease. FEBS J. 2019, 286, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dieckmann, G.; Goyal, S.; Hamrah, P. Neuropathic Corneal Pain: Approaches for Management. Ophthalmology 2017, 124, S34–S47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rosenthal, P.; Borsook, D. Ocular neuropathic pain. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 100, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ebrahimiadib, N.; Yousefshahi, F.; Abdi, P.; Ghahari, M.; Modjtahedi, B.S. Ocular Neuropathic Pain: An Overview Focusing on Ocular Surface Pains. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2020, 14, 2843–2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hosal, B.M.; Ornek, N.; Zilelioglu, G.; Elhan, A.H. Morphology of corneal nerves and corneal sensation in dry eye: A preliminary study. Eye 2005, 19, 1276–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Labbe, A.; Liang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, L.; Baudouin, C.; Sun, X. Corneal nerve structure and function in patients with non-sjogren dry eye: Clinical correlations. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 5144–5150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Costigan, M.; Scholz, J.; Woolf, C.J. Neuropathic pain: A maladaptive response of the nervous system to damage. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 32, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Cooper, M.A.; Kluding, P.M.; Wright, D.E. Emerging Relationships between Exercise, Sensory Nerves, and Neuropathic Pain. Front. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Han, B.I.; Lee, H.W.; Kim, T.Y.; Lim, J.S.; Shin, K.S. Tinnitus: Characteristics, causes, mechanisms, and treatments. J. Clin. Neurol. 2009, 5, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Moller, A.R. Sensorineural Tinnitus: Its Pathology and Probable Therapies. Int. J. Otolaryngol. 2016, 2016, 2830157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Shapiro, S.B.; Noij, K.S.; Naples, J.G.; Samy, R.N. Hearing Loss and Tinnitus. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 105, 799–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lerat, J.; Magdelaine, C.; Roux, A.F.; Darnaud, L.; Beauvais-Dzugan, H.; Naud, S.; Richard, L.; Derouault, P.; Ghorab, K.; Magy, L.; et al. Hearing loss in inherited peripheral neuropathies: Molecular diagnosis by NGS in a French series. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2019, 7, e839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kim, J.M.; Kim, S.Y.; Chin, H.S.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, N.R.; on behalf of the Epidemiologic Survey Committee of The Korean Ophthalmological Society. Relationships between Hearing Loss and the Prevalences of Cataract, Glaucoma, Diabetic Retinopathy, and Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Korea. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lee, J.H.; Lee, W.; Yoon, J.H.; Seok, H.; Roh, J.; Won, J.U. Relationship between symptoms of dry eye syndrome and occupational characteristics: The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010–2012. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015, 15, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ahn, J.M.; Lee, S.H.; Rim, T.H.; Park, R.J.; Yang, H.S.; Kim, T.I.; Yoon, K.C.; Seo, K.Y.; Epidemiologic Survey Committee of the Korean Ophthalmological Society. Prevalence of and risk factors associated with dry eye: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010–2011. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 158, 1205–1214.e1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Um, S.B.; Yeom, H.; Kim, N.H.; Kim, H.C.; Lee, H.K.; Suh, I. Association between dry eye symptoms and suicidal ideation in a Korean adult population. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ahn, J.H.; Choi, Y.H.; Paik, H.J.; Kim, M.K.; Wee, W.R.; Kim, D.H. Sex differences in the effect of aging on dry eye disease. Clin. Interv. Aging 2017, 12, 1331–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Craig, J.P.; Nelson, J.D.; Azar, D.T.; Belmonte, C.; Bron, A.J.; Chauhan, S.K.; de Paiva, C.S.; Gomes, J.A.P.; Hammitt, K.M.; Jones, L.; et al. TFOS DEWS II Report Executive Summary. Ocul. Surf. 2017, 15, 802–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, K.I.; Park, Y.S.; Kim, R.H.; Kim, J.H. Factors Associated with Dry Eye Symptoms in Elderly Koreans: The Fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010–2012. Korean J. Fam. Med. 2019, 40, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lee, W.; Lim, S.S.; Won, J.U.; Roh, J.; Lee, J.H.; Seok, H.; Yoon, J.H. The association between sleep duration and dry eye syn-drome among Korean adults. Sleep Med. 2015, 16, 1327–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zahra, I.Y.H. Dry eye syndrome risk factors: A systemic review. Saudi J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 35, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Agrup, C.; Gleeson, M.; Rudge, P. The inner ear and the neurologist. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2007, 78, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ekdale, E.G. Form and function of the mammalian inner ear. J. Anat. 2016, 228, 324–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shulman, A.; Wang, W.; Luo, H.; Bao, S.; Searchfield, G.; Zhang, J. Neuroinflammation and Tinnitus. Curr. Top Behav. Neurosci. 2021, 51, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Espinosa-Sanchez, J.M.; Lopez-Escamez, J.A. New insights into pathophysiology of vestibular migraine. Front. Neurol. 2015, 6, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Thompson, T.L.; Amedee, R. Vertigo: A review of common peripheral and central vestibular disorders. Ochsner J. 2009, 9, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Chin, J.; Kviatkovsky, B.; Lomiguen, C. Osteopathic Considerations for Peripheral Neuropathy Due to Concomitant Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis Syndrome and Lumbar Epidural Lipomatosis: Case Report. Interact. J. Med. Res. 2019, 8, e14607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fakih, D.; Zhao, Z.; Nicolle, P.; Reboussin, E.; Joubert, F.; Luzu, J.; Labbe, A.; Rostene, W.; Baudouin, C.; Melik Parsadaniantz, S.; et al. Chronic dry eye induced corneal hypersensitivity, neuroinflammatory responses, and synaptic plasticity in the mouse trigeminal brainstem. J. Neuroinflammation 2019, 16, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. McMonnies, C.W. The potential role of neuropathic mechanisms in dry eye syndromes. J. Optom. 2017, 10, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Temirbekov, D.; Sakalli, E. Effects of Peripheral Vertigo on Inflammatory and Immunologic Laboratory Markers. Ear Nose Throat J. 2020, 99, 470–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shushan, S.; Shemesh, S.; Ungar, O.J.; Cavel, O.; Handzel, O.; Tamir, S.O.; Oron, Y. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio among Patients with Vestibular Neuritis. ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec. 2019, 81, 304–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mun, Y.; Hwang, J.S.; Shin, Y.J. Role of Neutrophils on the Ocular Surface. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Meng, Y.F.; Pu, Q.; Ma, Q.; Zhu, W.; Li, X.Y. Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio as an Inflammatory Predictor of Dry Eye Disease: A Case-Control Study. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2021, 17, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sekeryapan, B.; Uzun, F.; Buyuktarakci, S.; Bulut, A.; Oner, V. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Increases in Patients with Dry Eye. Cornea 2016, 35, 983–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Celik, T. Assessment of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Dry Eye Disease. Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 2018, 26, 1219–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ozbay, I.; Kahraman, C.; Balikci, H.H.; Kucur, C.; Kahraman, N.K.; Ozkaya, D.P.; Oghan, F. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with peripheral vertigo: A prospective controlled clinical study. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2014, 35, 699–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bonini, S.; Labetoulle, M.; Messmer, E.; Aragona, P.; Benitez Castillo, J.M.; Ciprandi, G.; Damiani, V.; Irkec, M.; Baudouin, C.; Rolando, M. Association of Dry Eye with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Clinical Practice. Curr. Eye Res. 2022, 47, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Galor, A.; Moein, H.R.; Lee, C.; Rodriguez, A.; Felix, E.R.; Sarantopoulos, K.D.; Levitt, R.C. Neuropathic pain and dry eye. Ocul. Surf. 2018, 16, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nortey, J.; Smith, D.; Seitzman, G.D.; Gonzales, J.A. Topical Therapeutic Options in Corneal Neuropathic Pain. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 4103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rauschecker, J.P.; May, E.S.; Maudoux, A.; Ploner, M. Frontostriatal Gating of Tinnitus and Chronic Pain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2015, 19, 567–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Wallace, M.N.; Sumner, C.J.; Berger, J.I.; McNaughton, P.A.; Palmer, A.R. Salicylate decreases the spontaneous firing rate of guinea pig auditory nerve fibres. Neurosci. Lett. 2021, 747, 135705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ayaki, M.; Tsubota, K.; Kawashima, M.; Kishimoto, T.; Mimura, M.; Negishi, K. Sleep Disorders are a Prevalent and Serious Comorbidity in Dry Eye. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, DES143–DES150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zhu, Y.; Huang, X.; Lin, L.; Di, M.; Chen, R.; Fang, F.; Jin, X. Sleep Quality Is Associated With Severe Meibomian Gland Disruption in Dry Eye. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 812705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, S.; He, X.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, J.; Zong, R.; Zhuang, J.; Quantock, A.J.; Gao, Y.; Li, W.; et al. Obstructive Sleep Apnea Affects Lacrimal Gland Function. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022, 63, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mahfouz, R.; Barchuk, A.; Obeidat, A.E.; Mansour, M.M.; Hernandez, D.; Darweesh, M.; Aldiabat, M.; Al-Khateeb, M.H.; Yusuf, M.H.; Aljabiri, Y. The Relationship Between Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) in Inpatient Settings: A Nationwide Study. Cureus 2022, 14, e22810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Inagaki, Y.; Suzuki, N.; Oishi, N.; Goto, F.; Shinden, S.; Ogawa, K. Personality and Sleep Evaluation of Patients with Tinnitus in Japan. Psychiatr. Q. 2021, 92, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Czornik, M.; Malekshahi, A.; Mahmoud, W.; Wolpert, S.; Birbaumer, N. Psychophysiological treatment of chronic tinnitus: A review. Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 2022, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pattyn, T.; Van Den Eede, F.; Vanneste, S.; Cassiers, L.; Veltman, D.J.; Van De Heyning, P.; Sabbe, B.C.G. Tinnitus and anxiety disorders: A review. Hear. Res. 2016, 333, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ziai, K.; Moshtaghi, O.; Mahboubi, H.; Djalilian, H.R. Tinnitus Patients Suffering from Anxiety and Depression: A Review. Int. Tinnitus J. 2017, 21, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Na, K.S.; Han, K.; Park, Y.G.; Na, C.; Joo, C.K. Depression, Stress, Quality of Life, and Dry Eye Disease in Korean Women: A Population-Based Study. Cornea 2015, 34, 733–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vos, B.; Noll, D.; Pigeon, M.; Bagatto, M.; Fitzpatrick, E.M. Risk factors for hearing loss in children: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis protocol. Syst. Rev. 2019, 8, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart of the study population KHANES V.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the study population KHANES V.
Jcm 11 04171 g001
Table 1. Clinical characteristics according to dry eye in the study population.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics according to dry eye in the study population.
Non-Dry EyeDry Eye% Differencep-Value
N (%)15,720 (89.6%)1822 (10.4%)
Age 0.015 *
<60 years10,734 (90.0%)1198 (10.0%)
≥60 years4986 (88.9%)624 (11.1%)1.23
Dizziness and loss of balance <0.001 *
No8566 (90.3%)923 (9.7%)
Yes2269 (85.8%)377 (14.2%)5.11
Severe dizziness 0.144
No703 (85.3%)121 (14.7%)
Absent now, but present within a year 1206 (85.1%)211(14.9%)0.23
Yes360 (88.9%)45 (11.1%)4.13
Fall 0.183
No1969 (85.4%)336 (14.6%)
Yes300 (88.2%)40 (11.8%)3.22
Self-awareness of abnormal voice <0.001 *
No14,416 (89.9%)1612 (10.1%)
Yes990 (85.3%)171 (14.7%)5.25
Period of voice abnormality 0.447
<3 weeks404 (86.3%)64 (13.7%)
>3 weeks584 (84.6%)106 (15.4%)1.99
Subjective hearing discomfort 0.002 *
No uncomfortable 13,071 (89.9%)1462(10.1%)
A little uncomfortable 1821 (87.3%)266 (12.7%)2.93
Very uncomfortable 466 (90.1%)51 (9.9%)0.22
Unable to hear48 (92.3%)4 (7.7%)2.63
Hearing aid or artificial cochlear implant use 0.404
No2152 (87.7%)302 (12.3%)
Rarely used52 (92.9%)4 (7.1%)5.76
Yes130 (89.7%)15 (10.3%)2.25
Tinnitus <0.001 *
No11,932 (90.4%)1260 (9.6%)
Yes3431 (86.8%)522 (13.2%)4.06
Unable to remember43 (97.7%)1 (2.3%)7.76
Discomforts of life due to the fact of tinnitus 0.469
No2246 (87.2%)330 (12.8%)
Annoying1057 (86.3%)168 (13.7%)1.04
Difficult to sleep128 (84.2%)24 (15.8%)3.5
Unilateral hearing loss 0.594
No13,306 (89.5%)1,563 (10.5%)
Yes1126 (90.0%)125 (10.0%)0.56
Bilateral hearing loss <0.001 *
No13,645 (89.3%)1629 (10.7%)
Yes787 (93.0%)59 (7.0%)4.06
p Values were determined using the chi-squared test for categorical variables. * p < 0.05.
Table 2. Factors that affect the occurrence of dry eye after adjusting for age (60 years) and gender.
Table 2. Factors that affect the occurrence of dry eye after adjusting for age (60 years) and gender.
OR95% CIp-Value
Dizziness and loss of balance experience
No1.0 (ref)
Yes1.3551.188–1.546<0.001 *
Severe dizziness
No 1.0 (ref)
Absent now, but present within a year 1.3470.932–1.9450.113
Yes, present0.9960.780–1.2700.972
Fall
No1.0 (ref)
Yes0.7930.557–1.1290.197
Self-awareness of abnormal voice
No1.0 (ref)
Yes1.4531.222–1.727<0.001 *
Period of voice abnormality
<3 weeks 1.0 (ref)
>3 weeks1.1790.840–1.6550.341
Subjective hearing discomfort
No uncomfortable1.0 (ref)
A little uncomfortable1.2941.118–1.4980.001 *
Very uncomfortable10.738–1.3551
Unable to hear 0.7630.272–2.1360.606
Hearing aid or artificial cochlear implant use
No1.0 (ref)
Rarely used0.9440.541–1.6470.84
Yes0.6210.221–1.7470.367
Tinnitus
No1.0 (ref)
Yes1.3811.236–1.543<0.001 *
Unable to remember0.2010.028–1.4680.114
Discomforts of life due to the fact of tinnitus
Not uncomfortable1.0 (ref)
Annoying1.3170.832–2.0860.24
Difficult to sleep1.1860.741–1.8990.478
Unilateral hearing loss
No1.0 (ref)
Yes0.9460.775–1.1530.581
Bilateral hearing loss
No1.0 (ref)
Yes0.5970.452–0.790<0.001*
p Values were determined by binominal logistic regression analysis. * p < 0.05.
Table 3. Factors that affect dry eye after adjusting for age, gender, dizziness, self-awareness of abnormal voice, subjective hearing discomfort, tinnitus and bilateral hearing loss.
Table 3. Factors that affect dry eye after adjusting for age, gender, dizziness, self-awareness of abnormal voice, subjective hearing discomfort, tinnitus and bilateral hearing loss.
OR95% CIp-Value
Dizziness and loss of balance1.3151.143–1.513<0.001 *
Self-awareness of abnormal voice1.3721.120–1.6790.001 *
Subjective hearing discomfort
No uncomfortable
A little uncomfortable1.2781.084–1.5060.003 *
Very uncomfortable1.1650.817–1.6630.399
Unable to hear1.5020.513–4.3990.458
Tinnitus
No
Yes1.2651.101–1.4530.001 *
Unable to remember0.330.044–2.4690.28
Bilateral hearing loss0.4970.367–0.672<0.001 *
p Values were determined by binominal logistic regression analysis. * p < 0.05.
Table 4. Auditory thresholds according to dry eye.
Table 4. Auditory thresholds according to dry eye.
Non-Dry EyeDry Eyep-Value
N14,7281713
Age (Y) 50.63 ± 16.2351.72 ± 15.900.009 *
Right ear
500 Hz (dB)36.34 ± 138.8130.47 ± 118.830.058
1000 Hz (dB)34.39 ± 139.1628.66 ± 119.170.065
2000 Hz (dB)37.19 ± 138.9531.52 ± 119.020.067
3000 Hz (dB)40.94 ± 138.9434.14 ± 119.150.028 *
4000 Hz (dB)45.30 ± 138.7036.44 ± 116.810.004 *
6000 Hz (dB)55.49 ± 137.6547.74 ± 118.170.012 *
Mean (dB)37.23 ± 138.8831.21 ± 118.920.052
Left ear
500 Hz (dB)37.37 ± 138.6631.24 ± 118.920.047 *
1000 Hz (dB)33.94 ± 138.2627.70 ± 119.200.044 *
2000 Hz (dB)37.54 ± 139.0131.05 ± 119.030.036 *
3000 Hz (dB)42.08 ± 138.9534.22 ± 119.160.011 *
4000 Hz (dB)46.27 ± 138.6837.28 ± 119.050.004 *
6000 Hz (dB)57.23 ± 137.5549.60 ± 118.160.013 *
Mean (dB)37.75 ± 138.8831.07 ± 118.890.031 *
p Values were determined by independent t-test. * p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, K.W.; Hwang, J.S.; Chang, J.; Shin, Y.J. Association of Dry Eye Diseases and Auditory Sensitivity. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4171. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144171

AMA Style

Kim KW, Hwang JS, Chang J, Shin YJ. Association of Dry Eye Diseases and Auditory Sensitivity. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(14):4171. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144171

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Kyung Wook, Jin Sun Hwang, Jiwon Chang, and Young Joo Shin. 2022. "Association of Dry Eye Diseases and Auditory Sensitivity" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 14: 4171. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144171

APA Style

Kim, K. W., Hwang, J. S., Chang, J., & Shin, Y. J. (2022). Association of Dry Eye Diseases and Auditory Sensitivity. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(14), 4171. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144171

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop