Analysis of Visual Risk Factors of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury of Knee Joint
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Congratulations on an excellent paper on a topic of considerable relevance in trauma. In this regard, the study offers a significant element for the prevention of risk factors of ACL injury, which is of absolute social importance. Very interesting is the exposition regarding the external factors that affect its mechanism of production of ACL injuries, represented not only by the physical condition of athletes and the degree of coordination of motor and proprioceptive balance, but also by optimal coordination of visual function, which influences their gait, balance function and neurosensomotor response time, which are decisive factors for the preventability and predictability of sports injuries.
I believe that the information provided is sufficient and represents useful elements for the development of new scientific work.
Author Response
Thank you for your review, wish you work smoothly!Reviewer 2 Report
Review on manuscript Analysis of visual risk factors of anterior cruciate ligament injury of knee joint.
In my topic of the study is very important as the ACL injury happens often among athletes and further studies regarding primary prevention possibilities are valuable.
The manuscript in my opinion it is a very well prepared, clearly written and interesting.
Introduction brings well into study field. Authors have taken into consideration many important intristic and extrinstic aspects ACL injury.
Authors found that athletes with abnormal visual fusion range will have increase the risk of ACL non-contact and contact injury when they do quick turn, sudden stop, jump on hard ground such as wooden floor or cement ground on cloudy days.
Congratulations for authors hard work and throughout analysis.
Minor:
Authors stated that “The participants in both groups were male”, but in tables female are included.
Author Response
Sorry for our mistake, This sentence has been changed to "The main participants in both groups were male". Thank you for your careful review!Author Response File: Author Response.docx