3. Results
A total of 100 adult participants (48 males/52 females) were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the participants was 32.33 ± 11.29. Epilepsy was present in 71% of patients and 31% had experienced infantile spams in the past. Intellectual disability (borderline to profound) occurred in a total of 44% of subjects, of which 16.7% had borderline (IQ 70–80), 21.4% mild (IQ 50–69), 26.2% moderate (IQ 35–49), 14.3% severe (IQ 21–34) and 26.2% profound (IQ < 20) intellectual disability.
The characteristics of the study group are presented in
Table 2.
In general, the most common symptoms on a behavioural level were temper tantrums (61%), difficulties in paying attention (59%) and getting on with people of similar ages (58%), impulsivity (57%), and anxiety (54%). The most common psychiatric disorders were ASD (22%), anxiety (19%), and depressive (13%) disorders and the most problematic scholastic skill was mathematics (52%). On a neuropsychological level, four out of six cognitive functions were problematic in more than half of individuals with TSC. On a psychosocial level, the most common symptom was low self-esteem (52%). All of the detailed results are presented in
Table 3 and
Table 4.
There was a statistically significant difference in the coexistence of intellectual disability, autism, and epilepsy based on patients’ IQ F(hypothesis df, Error df) = F value, p < sig; Wilk’s Λ = value, partial η2 = partial eta squared (F(2,97) = 25.052, p < 0.001; Wilk’s Λ = 0.659, partial η2 = 0.341).For a better understanding of the various cohorts of TSC individuals studied, the results were also analysed despite the presence/absence of epilepsy and normal IQ/intellectual disability.
Comparing epilepsy to the epilepsy-free groups, statistically significant differences were observed in the frequency of depressed mood (
p = 0.03), speech delay (
p = 0.002), difficulties getting on with other people of similar ages (
p = 0.001), paying attention (
p = 0.042) and impulsivity (
p = 0.001). ASD was only observed in the epilepsy group, although anxiety disorder was more often diagnosed in epilepsy-free individuals than in individuals with epilepsy. Patients with epilepsy more often had difficulties than the epilepsy-free group within all neuropsychological functions. Although, statistically significant differences between the mentioned groups were observed in executive functioning (
p = 0.035) and getting disoriented (
p = 0.001). Family stress (
p = 0.005) and relationship problems were more often reported by individuals without epilepsy than by epileptic subjects (
p = 0.005). The comparison of TAND results in the epilepsy and epilepsy-free groups is presented in
Table 3.
In the comparison of intellectually disabled/normal IQ groups, statistically significant differences were observed in anxiety (
p = 0.045) and depressed mood (
p = 0.045), self-injury (
p = 0.05), difficulties getting on with other people of similar ages (
p = 0.001) and paying attention (
p = 0.045), restlessness or fidgetiness (
p = 0.005) and impulsivity (
p = 0.05). In the intellectually disabled group, almost half of the subjects were diagnosed with ASD, and did not develop mathematical or spelling skills. On a neuropsychological level, the biggest difference was observed in attention (
p = 0.037), executive functions (
p = 0.05) and getting disoriented (
p = 0.032). Family stress (
p = 0.035) and relationship difficulties (
p = 0.002) were more frequently observed in individuals with normal IQ than in intellectually disabled group. The comparison of TAND results in the normal IQ and intellectually disabled groups is presented in
Table 4.
In the ninth question of TAND, individuals were asked to rate how much the difficulties stated bother them on a scale of 1 to 10. The mean caregiver in the general group was 5.87 (intellectually disabled—6.6, normal IQ—5.3, epilepsy—6, and epilepsy-free—5.1).
The twelfth question was completed by the person who conducted the TAND checklist examination (psychologist) and concerned the impact of TAND on the individual and their family (on a scale from 1 to 10). The mean specialist rate for the general group was 5.1 (intellectually disabled—6, normal IQ—4.4, epilepsy—5.3, and epilepsy-free—4.5).
Statistically significant differences (calculated with the Mann–Whitney U-test) between subjective (patient/caregiver) and objective (specialist/psychologist) rates were observed in the normal IQ (difference = 0.9) and epilepsy (difference = 0.75) groups. Detailed results are presented in
Table 5.
According to the TAND interview, only 11% of individuals had ever completed the TAND Checklist and those who had were the youngest subgroup of a studied cohort (18–21 years old). Only 36% had ever received psychological or psychiatric evaluation and almost none had ever had a detailed neuropsychological assessment. Scholastic difficulties were the most often examined symptoms assessed in 56% of subjects. The TAND Checklist revealed that 89% of the examined subjects had at least four TAND features (more in the intellectually disabled group—95.2%). Most symptoms were reported in patients in the intellectual disability (m = 14.5) and epilepsy groups (m = 14.8). Detailed results are presented in
Table 6 and
Table 7.
The more frequent TAND problems detected in our cohort were (at the behavioural level): difficulty paying attention (n = 20), extreme shyness (n = 29), mood swings (n = 21), repeating words or phrases over and over again (n = 22), difficulty getting on with peers (n = 20), being very rigid or inflexible about how to do things (n = 26), and restlessness or fidgetiness (n = 22). At the psychiatric level, anxiety disorders (n = 10) prevailed. At an intellectual level, intellectual disability affected 15 cases, while difficulties with writing and mathematics prevailed at the academic level. At the neuropsychological level, 14 patients showed difficulties in multitasking and 10 in cognitive flexibility. Finally, at the psychosocial level, 14 cases had difficulties in social interaction.
Several additional problems, not included in TAND Checklist, were mentioned by the interviewed subjects.
In an in-depth interview, several subjects from the normal-IQ group mentioned a fear of having children, as well as feelings of guilt related to the transmission of the TSC gene to their descendants. This was especially related to individuals with newly confirmed TSC (n = 8), some of whom were diagnosed after their child received a diagnosis. Half of the interviewed patients within the normal IQ (n = 28) range reported relationship problems such as being separated, divorced or having intimate relationships with other people related to low self-esteem and feelings of shame. One of the additional issues mentioned by subjects in our study was relationship difficulties, related to sexual problems, which were mostly associated with a fear of getting pregnant and the feelings of shame and low self-esteem caused by skin lesions. Moreover, psychologists noted low levels of sexual education, especially within the intellectually disabled group. Adding sexual education specialists, especially for the young adult group, might help with some of their needs.
In additional issues, patients within the normal IQ range mentioned occupational problems related to concentration difficulties (n = 14), as well as getting hired because of their epilepsy (n = 7).
ASD symptoms were noticed in eight individuals with normal IQ and without psychiatric diagnosis.
Additional psychiatric assessment was referred in eight cases. Three were diagnosed with depressive disorder, three with anxiety disorder, one with bipolar disorder and one with dissociative disorders (dissociative neurological symptom disorder, with non-epileptic seizures and dissociative amnesia).
Furthermore, 23% of subjects with normally distributed IQ reported suicidal thoughts and 11% attempted suicide (some of them multiple times).
4. Discussion
TSC has become the subject of more intensive research in the last decade of the twentieth century. Despite this, knowledge of neuropsychiatric illnesses remains insufficient to describe a patient’s functioning profile. Similar to the wide variety of physical symptoms, neuropsychiatric symptoms of TSC differ between patients; thus, each individual with TSC has their own unique TAND profile [
20,
28].
Our research aimed to identify all symptoms that concern adult TSC patients and their families; in the future, this may allow a personalised intervention plan focused on their needs to be created. During the diagnostic procedure, many of these abnormalities are ignored. Previous research highlights the fact that, although TANDs appear in the vast majority of patients, less than 20% of patients with TSC are properly diagnosed and receive the necessary help [
25,
32]. Our results show that when considering only adult populations, the detailed TAND assessment is even rarer. In our study, only 11% of individuals ever received a complete TAND features examination and those who had were the youngest of our cohort. This emphasises the fact that a greater gap exists in the treatment of TAND symptoms in adult patients. In our study, 89% of subjects mentioned more than four TAND symptoms (the mean count of TAND symptoms was 12.8) and only 36% ever received any form of psychological or psychiatric help.
A recent multidisciplinary study of TSC, the Tuberous Sclerosis registry to increase disease Awareness (TOSCA), showed that 44.4% of participants were within the normal range of intellectual abilities (47% within adults). In our study, 37% of subjects had a diagnosis of intellectual disability. A lower count of intellectually disabled patients in our study than in the TOSCA study might be explained by the source of subjects (nephrology clinics). It is plausible that some adult patients with an intellectual disability did not yet present the necessity for treatment of renal manifestations of TSC. Another possible explanation is that, due to the pandemic (the study was conducted between July 2017 and July 2021), some patients had logistic problems with access to healthcare.
In our study, more than half of individuals had behavioural problems such as temper tantrums, difficulties in paying attention and getting on with other people of similar ages, impulsivity, and high levels of anxiety. The most common psychiatric diagnosis was ASD, in 22% of individuals. The identification and acknowledgment of behavioural issues should lead to the identification of possible causes of behavioural challenges and the execution of suitable therapeutic procedures, although the minority of patients received needed psychiatric and therapeutic help.
Affective disorders such as anxiety and depressive disorders are underdiagnosed among the studied population, as high levels of anxiety were the most common affective symptom and depressive symptoms concerned 1/3 of subjects. In our study, eight patients were referred for further psychiatric diagnosis (three were diagnosed with depressive disorder, three with anxiety disorder, one with bipolar disorder and one with dissociative disorders—dissociative neurological symptom disorder, with non-epileptic seizures, and dissociative amnesia). In all eight cases, psychopharmacotherapy was introduced. Furthermore, psychotherapy was recommended for improving their mental health status.
Although scholastic skills concerned the majority of TSC individuals, among the youngest group, 67% received necessary help, such as individual school plans. Similar to an intellectual development diagnosis, 89% of intellectually disabled subjects received a formal IQ assessment. Even though, subjectively, four out of six cognitive functions were problematic in more than half of the TSC individuals studied, none of them ever received a formal neuropsychological assessment in their adult life. This underlines the greatest gap in the currently existing diagnostic system.
Moreover, TAND symptoms differ between patient cohorts (e.g., with and without intellectual disability and/or epilepsy). Our findings showed that epilepsy-free individuals more often report a depressed mood. Similarly, anxiety disorder was more often diagnosed in the epilepsy-free group. This might be linked to a potential positive impact of antiepileptic drugs on mood [
33]. Similar results were observed in the comparison of intellectually disabled and normal-IQ subjects in which individuals with an IQ within the normal range had higher levels of depression than intellectually disabled subjects, possibly linked to the subjective higher rating TAND impact on everyday life. Toldo et al. [
9] claimed that those findings support the hypothesis that patients with a normal IQ could have a better awareness of their pathology that favours the development of an internalising and affective disorder. It is worth considering that the diagnosis of depression in intellectually disabled patients is more challenging, especially in those who did not develop or have a speech delay. Nevertheless, it seems that affective problems are underdiagnosed in all adult groups and it should be noted that subjects with TSC have to be diagnosed by psychiatrists with a special focus.
The results of our study showed that patients with epilepsy and those who are intellectually disabled more often had difficulties with all neuropsychological functions than epilepsy-free individuals, especially concerning executive functioning and getting disoriented. It is widely known that epilepsy itself causes both disturbances in cognitive development and neuropsychological deficits, which leads to encephalopathy [
34,
35,
36,
37].
Our results showed that intellectually disabled patients with TSC have more behavioural problems, such as self-injury, difficulties getting on with other people of similar ages and paying attention, restlessness or fidgetiness and impulsivity. This is related to the fact that almost half of the subjects in the intellectually disabled group were diagnosed with ASD and those problems are common within the spectrum. However, it is worth noting that 23% of subjects with normally distributed IQ reported suicidal thoughts and 11% attempted suicide (some of them multiple times). Moreover, family stress and relationship difficulties were more frequently observed in normal IQ and epilepsy-free individuals than in intellectually disabled and epileptic groups. To date, there has been no report describing the frequency of suicide issues in TSC. Based on our research, we noticed that suicide is one of the most important psychiatric issues and its addition to the revised version of the TAND Checklist should be considered.
Family stress and relationship problems were more often reported by individuals without epilepsy than with epilepsy. In an in-depth interview, those individuals mentioned a fear of having children more often, as well as feelings of guilt related to the transmission of the TSC gene to their descendants. This was especially related to individuals with newly confirmed TSC, some of whom were diagnosed after their child received a diagnosis. Half of the interviewed patients within the normal IQ range reported relationship problems such as being separated, divorced or having intimate relationships with other people related to impulsivity, low self-esteem, and feelings of shame. In additional issues, patients within the normal IQ range mentioned occupational problems related to concentration difficulties, as well as getting hired because of their epilepsy. Adding another question about work status to TAND Checklist might therefore be useful. Caregivers of intellectually disabled individuals mentioned the incapacitation of their children and worries about the future care of TSC patients related to ageing [
38]. All of those aspects show that social care providers should also be introduced to the therapeutic team.
Several additional problems, not included in the TAND Checklist, were mentioned by the interviewed subjects. Some adults with TSC faced different types of problems, such as pregnancy and the diagnosis of TSC in their child. Families who have learned of their child’s illness face a stressful situation and require psychological assistance. Later on, they will need a lot of help, as well as attention for their problems and information about possible sources and forms of assistance. Families who face their children’s disorders without sufficient help end up facing separation and divorce. Adding the age of diagnosis and more detailed questions about family status and TSC in children to the TAND Checklist might help to find potential fields of special needs. Few patients learned about their diagnosis after having a child with more eminent features; all of them faced feeling of guilt and fear.
One of the additional issues mentioned by subjects in our study was relationship difficulties, related to sexual problems, which were mostly associated with a fear of getting pregnant and the feelings of shame and low self-esteem caused by skin lesions. Moreover, psychologists noted low levels of sexual education, especially within the intellectually disabled group. Adding sexual education specialists, especially for the young adult group, might help with some of their needs.
The minority of individuals with TSC may never have any TAND problems. However, it is important to consider that TAND symptoms may arise later in life despite years of apparently “normal” functioning. The diversity of psychopathologies that influence each other makes the accurate diagnosis of neuropsychiatric symptoms extremely difficult. All risk areas must be properly diagnosed and patients must receive the required psychological and psychiatric care, as well as effective treatments for their individual illnesses. Our findings based on the TAND Checklist showed that neuropsychiatric features in adult patients with TSC have to be properly assessed. Detailed, structural, deepened interviews with patients and/or their caregivers are needed for the best practice allowing for precise additional diagnostic testing or specialised counselling; describing the mechanism of challenges or providing information on therapy centres that deal with a specific problem are both examples of person-centred interventions.