Predisposing Factors and Neurologic Outcomes of Patients with Elevated Serum Amylase and/or Lipase after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study
by
, , and
Shin Young Park
1, 
Min Joung Kim
1,
Incheol Park
1,
Ha Yan Kim
2,
Myeongjee Lee
2,
Yoo Seok Park
1,* and
Sung Phil Chung
1 1
Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
2
Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(5), 1426; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051426
Submission received: 24 January 2022
/
Revised: 23 February 2022
/
Accepted: 3 March 2022
/
Published: 4 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Emergency Medicine)
Abstract
:This study investigated the patient outcomes, incidence, and predisposing factors of elevated pancreatic enzyme levels after OHCA. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients treated with targeted temperature management (TTM) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Elevation of pancreatic enzyme levels was defined as serum amylase or lipase levels that were at least three times the upper limit of normal. The factors associated with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels and their association with neurologic outcomes and mortality 28 days after OHCA were analyzed. Among the 355 patients, 166 (46.8%) patients developed elevated pancreatic enzyme levels. In the multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval), initial shockable rhythm (0.62, 0.39–0.98, p = 0.04), time from collapse to return of spontaneous circulation (1.02, 1.01–1.04, p < 0.001), and history of coronary artery disease (1.7, 1.01–2.87, p = 0.046) were associated with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels. After adjusting for confounding factors, elevated pancreatic enzyme levels were associated with neurologic outcomes (5.44, 3.35–8.83, p < 0.001) and mortality (3.74, 2.39–5.86, p < 0.001). Increased pancreatic enzyme levels are common in patients treated with TTM after OHCA and are associated with unfavorable neurologic outcomes and mortality at 28 days after OHCA.
1. Introduction
Despite significant advances in post-cardiac arrest care [1], hospital mortality remains high in patients who experience out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) [2,3]. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome is defined by unique and complex combinations of pathophysiological processes after the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). It comprises post-cardiac arrest brain injury, myocardial dysfunction, systemic ischemia/reperfusion response, and persistent precipitating pathology [4]. Of these, systemic ischemia/reperfusion response may be compared to a sepsis-like syndrome, which causes multiple organ damage [5]. Although many studies on solid organ damage have evaluated the kidney and liver, only a few studies have investigated pancreatic damage after ROSC [6,7,8,9,10].
The clinical course of acute pancreatitis ranges from recovery without special treatment to death [11]. Despite significant progress in the treatment of acute pancreatitis, morbidity and mortality rates remain high [12]. An animal study reported that ischemia/reperfusion injury of the pancreas caused acute pancreatitis [13]. Moreover, blood flow suppression (total or near-total) by cross-clamping of the descending thoracic aorta during aortic aneurysm surgery, even for a brief duration, resulted in significant pancreatic injury [14]. The increase in serum pancreatic enzyme level was also correlated with the aortic clamping time. However, there are only a few studies on ischemic pancreatitis in association with cardiac arrest. Polderman [15] reported that hypothermia treatment in post-cardiac arrest syndrome often resulted in elevated levels of amylase in the blood, but the risk of clinically severe pancreatitis was low. However, Choi et al. [16] reported that acute pancreatitis was the most common complication after hypothermia treatment in patients with ROSC after cardiac arrest due to drowning. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, no study in the literature has evaluated the relationship between increased pancreatic enzyme levels and neurologic prognosis in patients with OHCA after targeted temperature management (TTM). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the incidence of and predisposing factors for elevated serum amylase and/or lipase after OHCA, as well as patient outcomes.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Population
We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data using the registry of a critical pathway (CP) for post-resuscitation care, including TTM, from Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea, from September 2011 to October 2020. Patients who recovered spontaneous circulation after OHCA were selected for CP activation according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria [17]. We collected data of the index cardiac arrest event and outcomes according to the Utstein Style recommendation for reporting cardiac arrest research [18]. Post-cardiac arrest care, including TTM, was conducted in accordance with international guidelines. Patients aged <19 years, those who died within 24 h after ROSC, those transferred to another hospital, those whose families demanded for withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment during TTM, those with cardiac arrest due to trauma to exclude traumatic pancreatic damage, those diagnosed with pancreatitis before cardiac arrest, those diagnosed with pancreatic and biliary cancer, and those without serum amylase and lipase level data during the first 24 h after ROSC were excluded from the analysis. The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital (approval reference No. 4-2021-0567). The requirement for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee because of the retrospective nature of the study.
2.2. Data Collection
The patients’ demographic data (age, sex, weight, height, and comorbidities), resuscitation variables (initial rhythm, witnessed or unwitnessed arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) status, time from collapse to ROSC, presence or absence of defibrillation, total dose of epinephrine, and cause of arrest) were collected. Based on the CP protocol of our institution, serum amylase and lipase levels were measured immediately, 12 h, and 24 h after ROSC. However, the attending physician decided whether to perform additional tests for patients with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels. Based on previous studies that a significant increase in serum pancreatic enzyme levels peaks approximately 24 h after ischemic injury to the pancreas [14], we collected serum amylase and lipase data for up to 24 h in this study. The use of vasoactive agents, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were also recorded. Post-cardiac arrest shock was defined as the need for vasopressors or inotropics to maintain a mean arterial pressure of >65 mmHg even after fluid administration within 72 h of cardiac arrest.
2.3. Definition of Elevated Serum Pancreatic Enzyme Level
Acute pancreatitis was said to occur if more than two of the following three features were present: (1) typical abdominal pain of acute pancreatitis (acute upper abdominal pain radiating to the back), (2) serum amylase (normal value < 115 U/L) or lipase (normal value < 60 U/L) levels at least three times the upper limit of normal, and (3) characteristic findings of acute pancreatitis on computed tomography (CT) and, less commonly, magnetic resonance imaging or transabdominal ultrasonography [19,20,21,22,23]. However, abdominal pain cannot be evaluated in patients who receive TTM after cardiac arrest and an abdominal imaging study such as CT is not usually performed after cardiac arrest. Therefore, in this study, elevation of serum pancreatic enzyme levels was defined as a serum amylase or lipase level that was at least three times the upper limit of normal within 24 h after ROSC. Additionally, we divided elevated serum pancreatic enzyme levels into three groups: elevated amylase, elevated lipase, and elevated amylase and lipase levels.
2.4. Outcome Measures
The primary outcome of this study was the neurologic outcome at 28 days after ROSC. The Cerebral Performance Category score (CPC 1 = conscious and alert with good cerebral performance, CPC 2 = moderate cerebral disability, CPC 3 = severe cerebral disability, CPC 4 = coma or vegetative state, and CPC 5 = brain death) was used to assess neurologic outcome, with a CPC score of 1–2 being regarded as a favorable neurologic outcome and a score of 3–5 as an unfavorable neurologic outcome [24]. The secondary outcome was 28-day mortality.
2.5. Statistical Methods
Statistical analysis was performed using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and the R package ‘rms’ (version 3.6.3, http://www.R-project.org). Categorical variables are presented as frequency (%), whereas continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The independent two-sample t-test was used to compare continuous variables, and the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables, as appropriate. Changes in serum amylase and lipase levels over time were analyzed using a linear mixed model in patients with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels. For the evaluation of the risk factors associated with elevated serum pancreatic enzyme levels, univariate logistic regression analysis was performed using the demographic and resuscitation variables. Thereafter, multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed with variables that had a p-value of <0.1 in the univariate logistic regression. To assess the association between elevated pancreatic enzyme levels and neurologic outcomes or mortality, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis after covariate adjustment. We conducted subgroup analysis according to the division of elevated serum pancreatic enzyme levels. To assess adjusted relationships between the maximum pancreatic enzyme level within 24 h and prognosis, we used restricted cubic spline regression models with 4 knots placed at the 5th, 35th, 65th, and 95th percentiles. The maximum serum amylase or lipase level was employed in the logistic regression analysis with the spline term after covariate adjustment. All reported p-values are two-sided, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Baseline Characteristics
3.2. Characteristics of and Risk Factors for Elevated Pancreatic Enzyme Levels
Increased pancreatic enzyme levels within 24 h after ROSC occurred in 166 patients (46.8%). The mean age of patients with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels (65.0 ± 15.6 years) was significantly higher than that of patients without elevated pancreatic enzyme levels (61.5 ± 15.5 years). Among the laboratory test results, the amylase level (775.2 ± 691.9 U/L) measured at 12 h after ROSC was the highest, while lipase level (135.3 ± 292.7 U/L) was the highest after 24 h in patients with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels. In those patients, serum amylase and lipase tests were performed in 133 patients at 48 h after ROSC and in 85 patients at 72 h after ROSC. The amylase levels measured at 48 and 72 h after ROSC were 615.2 ± 574.8 U/L and 383.5 ± 401.2 U/L, respectively. These levels were lower than those measured at 12 h and 24 h (all p < 0.001). The lipase levels measured at 48 and 72 h after ROSC were 142.3 ± 401.4 U/L and 114.3 ± 379.3 U/L, respectively. However, the lipase level measured at 48 h was similar to that measured at 12 h and 24 h (p = 0.46 and p = 0.92, respectively) (Figure 2). Moreover, only six patients underwent an abdominal CT after increased pancreatic enzyme levels were noted. Among them, findings of pancreatitis were found in three patients. The initial shockable rhythm was 30.7% in the group with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels and 46.0% in patients without elevated pancreatic enzyme levels, and the difference was significant (p = 0.003). The mean time from collapse to ROSC for the group with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels was 33.9 ± 21.0 min, which was significantly longer than that for the group without elevated pancreatic enzyme level (25.1 ± 19.3 min, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, initial shockable rhythm (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39–0.98; p = 0.04], time from collapse to ROSC (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04; p < 0.001), and medical history of coronary artery disease (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.01–2.87; p = 0.046) were associated with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels (Table 2).
3.3. Neurologic Outcome and 28-Day Mortality
We observed significantly more unfavorable neurologic outcomes and higher 28-day mortality rates in patients with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels after OHCA than in patients without elevated pancreatic enzyme levels. The rates of unfavorable neurologic outcomes and 28-day mortality were 81.3% and 56.0%, respectively, in patients with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels compared to 42.4% and 25.4%, respectively, in patients without elevated pancreatic enzyme levels (both p < 0.001).
Factors associated with neurologic outcomes and 28-day mortality are described in Table 3. A total of 219 patients (61.7%) had unfavorable neurologic outcomes at 28 days after ROSC. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, patient age, sex, witnessed arrest, bystander CPR, shockable rhythm, cause of arrest, time from collapse to ROSC, medical history (such as diabetes mellitus and renal disease), post-cardiac arrest shock, CRRT application, and increase in pancreatic enzyme levels were significantly associated with neurologic prognosis. Of these, male sex (OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.20–7.28; p = 0.02), bystander CPR (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19–0.81; p = 0.01), shockable rhythm (OR, 0.44; 95% C,: 0.22–0.85; p = 0.012), time from collapse to ROSC (per minute) (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04–1.07; p < 0.001), cardiac cause of arrest (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12–0.53; p < 0.001), CRRT application (OR, 3.77; 95% CI, 1.22–11.65; p = 0.02), and elevated pancreatic enzyme levels (OR, 5.44; 95% CI, 3.35–8.83; p < 0.001) were associated with unfavorable neurologic outcomes as determined by multivariable logistic regression analysis (Table 4). At 28 days, 141 patients (39.7%) had died, and elevated pancreatic enzyme levels were also associated with 28-day mortality in the multivariable logistic regression analysis (OR, 3.74; 95% CI, 0.39–5.86; p < 0.001).
The subgroup analysis of elevated pancreatic enzyme levels compared with nonelevated pancreatic enzyme levels showed that amylase elevation alone was associated with both unfavorable neurologic outcomes (OR, 6.03; 95% CI; 3.03–12.00; p < 0.001) and 28-day mortality (OR, 2.8; 95% CI; 1.58–4.93; p < 0.001). Elevation of both amylase and lipase levels was only associated with unfavorable neurologic outcomes (OR, 7.08; 95% CI, 1.73–29.02; p < 0.01). However, lipase elevation alone was not associated with unfavorable neurologic outcomes or 28-day mortality.
In patients with unfavorable neurologic outcome, the maximum serum amylase within 24 h was 629.5 ± 730.5 U/L compared to 258.7 ± 297.5 U/L in patients with favorable neurologic outcomes (p < 0.001). To assess the relationship of maximum serum amylase and lipase levels with prognosis, we used restricted cubic spline regression models. When a reference amylase level of 345 U/L (three times the upper limit of normal) was used, the higher the maximum serum amylase level, the higher the odds for an unfavorable neurologic outcome (Figure 3A). However, there was no association between maximum serum amylase and 28-day mortality and between maximum serum lipase and neurologic outcomes or mortality (Figure 3B–D).
4. Discussion
In our study, of 355 patients who underwent TTM after OHCA, the prevalence of elevated pancreatic enzyme was 47%. We also observed that increase in pancreatic enzyme levels was associated with an unfavorable neurologic outcome and 28-day mortality. Furthermore, initial rhythm, time from collapse to ROSC, and history of coronary artery disease were factors associated with the development of elevated pancreatic enzyme levels. This study is the first to investigate the incidence, neurologic outcome, and predisposing factors of elevated pancreatic enzyme levels in patients treated with TTM after OHCA.
Systemic ischemia/reperfusion response, which is similar to sepsis syndrome [25], is an important component of post-cardiac arrest syndrome and causes multiple organ damage. Many studies on organ damage after cardiac arrest have involved the cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, and hepatic systems [6,7,8,9,10], but, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no such study on pancreatic damage after ROSC. The pancreas is sensitive to hypoxia and ischemia [14,26]. The role of ischemia in pancreatitis has been well reported in both clinical and laboratory studies [27,28,29]. However, we believe that there is only one case report about hypoxic pancreatitis following cardiac arrest, and in this case, the patient survived but developed ischemic encephalopathy [30]. In the present study, increase in pancreatic enzyme levels was a frequent complication and was related to an unfavorable neurologic prognosis and mortality in patients treated with TTM after OHCA.
Many studies have reported the mortality rate of acute pancreatitis [31,32,33,34]. The mortality rate among patients with acute pancreatitis is reported to be relatively high (21%), and the severity of the disease is a major factor affecting the mortality rate [31]. Our study also showed that patients with TTM after OHCA who developed increased pancreatic enzyme levels had unfavorable neurologic outcomes (81.3%) and a high mortality rate (56.0%). However, it is unclear whether this was due to elevated pancreatic enzyme levels or other causes such as hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy.
Serum amylase and lipase levels are commonly used as laboratory tests for diagnosing acute pancreatitis, but there are few studies about the effect of their levels on prognosis. A previous study showed that serum amylase and/or lipase levels decreased with worsening chronic pancreatitis [35], and another study in patients with acute paraquat poisoning reported that the higher the amylase level, the higher the mortality rate [36]. Patients with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels in the neurosurgery intensive care unit have a higher mortality rate than patients with normal enzyme levels [33]. In an animal study, hyperamylasemia was suggested but not confirmed as a pathogenic factor of pancreatic encephalopathy [37] and a possible contributor to the development of brain damage [38]. In our study, neurologic outcomes in patients with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels were worse when the amylase level was higher. However, above the reference amylase level (345 U/L), there was no difference in the 28-day mortality, even if the maximum serum amylase level increased further. Moreover, in the subgroup analysis, elevation of the amylase level alone was associated with an unfavorable neurologic outcome and 28-day mortality, but elevation of lipase level alone did not affect the prognosis. Further studies may be needed to determine the reason for such a result.
In this study, positive findings were found in only three of six patients who underwent abdominal CT after an increase in pancreatic enzyme levels. However, it is not yet known when the imaging changes of the pancreas will appear on CT in patients who have undergone cardiac arrest.
There are several limitations to this study. First, the generalizability of the results may be limited as the study was conducted in a single center. Second, we could not use the concept of acute pancreatitis due to hypoxic injury. Previously, the diagnosis was made when two or more of the three diagnostic criteria for acute pancreatitis were met, although a history of abdominal pain could not be recorded and abdominal CT is not usually performed in patients with OHCA. Therefore, in this study, only laboratory tests (amylase and lipase) were used. In addition, based on a previous study in which amylase and lipase levels peaked at 24 h, the laboratory tests were conducted for up to 24 h. Therefore, patients with elevated amylase or lipase levels 24 h after ROSC were not included in our study. Finally, some diseases affecting the serum amylase and/or lipase elevation, such as salivary gland lesions, renal failure, liver failure, peptic ulcer and biliary or gastrointestinal tract inflammation, and drugs that could cause amylase and/or lipase elevation were not considered [39,40]. Therefore, additional studies that can address these shortcomings are needed.
5. Conclusions
Increased serum pancreatic enzyme levels were found to be a common complication and a potent predictor of unfavorable neurologic outcomes and 28-day mortality in patients treated with TTM after OHCA. Initial rhythm, time from collapse to ROSC, and history of coronary artery disease were associated with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.Y.P., M.J.K., I.P., Y.S.P. and S.P.C.; methodology, H.Y.K. and M.L.; data analysis, S.Y.P., H.Y.K., M.L. and Y.S.P.; data curation, S.Y.P. and M.J.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.Y.P.; writing—review and editing, Y.S.P.; supervision, M.J.K., I.P. and S.P.C.; project administration, Y.S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Yoo Seok Park was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2018R1D1A2B07049888). The funding bodies had no role in the design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of this study. For the remaining authors, no conflicts of interest or sources of funding are declared.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital (approval reference No. 4-2021-0567).
Informed Consent Statement
The requirement for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee because of the retrospective nature of the study.
Data Availability Statement
Datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Dumas, F.; White, L.; Stubbs, B.A.; Cariou, A.; Rea, T.D. Long-term prognosis following resuscitation from out of hospital cardiac arrest: Role of percutaneous coronary intervention and therapeutic hypothermia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012, 60, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bougouin, W.; Lamhaut, L.; Marijon, E.; Jost, D.; Dumas, F.; Deye, N.; Beganton, F.; Empana, J.P.; Chazelle, E.; Cariou, A.; et al. Characteristics and prognosis of sudden cardiac death in greater paris: Population-based approach from the paris sudden death expertise center (paris-sdec). Intensive Care Med. 2014, 40, 846–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lemiale, V.; Dumas, F.; Mongardon, N.; Giovanetti, O.; Charpentier, J.; Chiche, J.D.; Carli, P.; Mira, J.P.; Nolan, J.; Cariou, A. Intensive care unit mortality after cardiac arrest: The relative contribution of shock and brain injury in a large cohort. Intensive Care Med. 2013, 39, 1972–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nolan, J.P.; Neumar, R.W.; Adrie, C.; Aibiki, M.; Berg, R.A.; Böttiger, B.W.; Callaway, C.; Clark, R.S.; Geocadin, R.G.; Jauch, E.C.; et al. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. A scientific statement from the international liaison committee on resuscitation; the american heart association emergency cardiovascular care committee; the council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia; the council on cardiopulmonary, perioperative, and critical care; the council on clinical cardiology; the council on stroke. Resuscitation 2008, 79, 350–379. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Adrie, C.; Adib-Conquy, M.; Laurent, I.; Monchi, M.; Vinsonneau, C.; Fitting, C.; Fraisse, F.; Dinh-Xuan, A.T.; Carli, P.; Spaulding, C.; et al. Successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation after cardiac arrest as a "sepsis-like" syndrome. Circulation 2002, 106, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Geri, G.; Guillemet, L.; Dumas, F.; Charpentier, J.; Antona, M.; Lemiale, V.; Bougouin, W.; Lamhaut, L.; Mira, J.P.; Vinsonneau, C.; et al. Acute kidney injury after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Risk factors and prognosis in a large cohort. Intensive Care Med. 2015, 41, 1273–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yanta, J.; Guyette, F.X.; Doshi, A.A.; Callaway, C.W.; Rittenberger, J.C. Renal dysfunction is common following resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2013, 84, 1371–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laurent, I.; Monchi, M.; Chiche, J.D.; Joly, L.M.; Spaulding, C.; Bourgeois, B.; Cariou, A.; Rozenberg, A.; Carli, P.; Weber, S.; et al. Reversible myocardial dysfunction in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 40, 2110–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Roberts, B.W.; Kilgannon, J.H.; Chansky, M.E.; Mittal, N.; Wooden, J.; Parrillo, J.E.; Trzeciak, S. Multiple organ dysfunction after return of spontaneous circulation in postcardiac arrest syndrome. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 41, 1492–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roedl, K.; Spiel, A.O.; Nürnberger, A.; Horvatits, T.; Drolz, A.; Hubner, P.; Warenits, A.M.; Sterz, F.; Herkner, H.; Fuhrmann, V. Hypoxic liver injury after in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Risk factors and neurological outcome. Resuscitation 2019, 137, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, W.; Wan, J.; Yang, X.; Chen, J.; Yang, Q.; Liu, F.; Xia, L. Heparin-binding protein levels at admission and within 24 h are associated with persistent organ failure in acute pancreatitis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2021, 66, 3597–3603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Banks, P.A.; Bollen, T.L.; Dervenis, C.; Gooszen, H.G.; Johnson, C.D.; Sarr, M.G.; Tsiotos, G.G.; Vege, S.S. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: Revision of the atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013, 62, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maduzia, D.; Ceranowicz, P.; Cieszkowski, J.; Chmura, A.; Galazka, K.; Kusnierz-Cabala, B.; Warzecha, Z. Administration of warfarin accelerates the recovery in ischemia/reperfusion-induced acute pancreatitis. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2020, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gullo, L.; Cavicchi, L.; Tomassetti, P.; Spagnolo, C.; Freyrie, A.; D’Addato, M. Effects of ischemia on the human pancreas. Gastroenterology 1996, 111, 1033–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polderman, K.H. Mechanisms of action, physiological effects, and complications of hypothermia. Crit. Care Med. 2009, 37, S186–S202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, S.P.; Youn, C.S.; Park, K.N.; Wee, J.H.; Park, J.H.; Oh, S.H.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, J.Y. Therapeutic hypothermia in adult cardiac arrest because of drowning. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2012, 56, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H.; Kim, M.J.; You, J.S.; Lee, H.S.; Park, Y.S.; Park, I.; Chung, S.P. Multimodal approach for neurologic prognostication of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients undergoing targeted temperature management. Resuscitation 2019, 134, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jacobs, I.; Nadkarni, V.; Bahr, J.; Berg, R.A.; Billi, J.E.; Bossaert, L.; Cassan, P.; Coovadia, A.; D’Este, K.; Finn, J.; et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: Update and simplification of the utstein templates for resuscitation registries. A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the international liaison committee on resuscitation (american heart association, european resuscitation council, australian resuscitation council, new zealand resuscitation council, heart and stroke foundation of canada, interamerican heart foundation, resuscitation council of southern africa). Resuscitation 2004, 63, 233–249. [Google Scholar]
- Banks, P.A.; Freeman, M.L. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 101, 2379–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Library of Medicine. Uk guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut 2005, 54 (Suppl. 3), iii1–iii9. [Google Scholar]
- Uhl, W.; Warshaw, A.; Imrie, C.; Bassi, C.; McKay, C.J.; Lankisch, P.G.; Carter, R.; Di Magno, E.; Banks, P.A.; Whitcomb, D.C.; et al. Iap guidelines for the surgical management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2002, 2, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arvanitakis, M.; Delhaye, M.; De Maertelaere, V.; Bali, M.; Winant, C.; Coppens, E.; Jeanmart, J.; Zalcman, M.; Van Gansbeke, D.; Devière, J.; et al. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2004, 126, 715–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bollen, T.L.; van Santvoort, H.C.; Besselink, M.G.; van Es, W.H.; Gooszen, H.G.; van Leeuwen, M.S. Update on acute pancreatitis: Ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging features. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2007, 28, 371–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rittenberger, J.C.; Raina, K.; Holm, M.B.; Kim, Y.J.; Callaway, C.W. Association between cerebral performance category, modified rankin scale, and discharge disposition after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2011, 82, 1036–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Adrie, C.; Laurent, I.; Monchi, M.; Cariou, A.; Dhainaou, J.F.; Spaulding, C. Postresuscitation disease after cardiac arrest: A sepsis-like syndrome? Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2004, 10, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sakorafas, G.H.; Tsiotos, G.G.; Sarr, M.G. Ischemia/reperfusion-induced pancreatitis. Dig. Surg. 2000, 17, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Robert, J.H.; Toledano, A.E.; Toth, L.S.; Premus, G.; Dreiling, D.A. Hypovolemic shock, pancreatic blood flow, and pancreatitis. Int. J. Pancreatol. 1988, 3, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanfey, H.; Broe, P.J.; Cameron, J.L. Experimental ischemic pancreatitis: Treatment with albumin. Am. J. Surg. 1985, 150, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lefer, A.M.; Spath, J.A., Jr. Pancreatic hypoperfusion and the production of a myocardial depressant factor in hemorrhagic shock. Ann. Surg. 1974, 179, 868–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piton, G.; Barbot, O.; Manzon, C.; Moronval, F.; Patry, C.; Navellou, J.C.; Belle, E.; Capellier, G. Acute ischemic pancreatitis following cardiac arrest: A case report. Jop 2010, 11, 456–459. [Google Scholar]
- Popa, C.C.; Badiu, D.C.; Rusu, O.C.; Grigorean, V.T.; Neagu, S.I.; Strugaru, C.R. Mortality prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. J. Med. Life 2016, 9, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Carnovale, A.; Rabitti, P.G.; Manes, G.; Esposito, P.; Pacelli, L.; Uomo, G. Mortality in acute pancreatitis: Is it an early or a late event? Jop 2005, 6, 438–444. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Lee, C.C.; Chung, W.Y.; Shih, Y.H. Elevated amylase and lipase levels in the neurosurgery intensive care unit. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2010, 73, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Malinoski, D.J.; Hadjizacharia, P.; Salim, A.; Kim, H.; Dolich, M.O.; Cinat, M.; Barrios, C.; Lekawa, M.E.; Hoyt, D.B. Elevated serum pancreatic enzyme levels after hemorrhagic shock predict organ failure and death. J. Trauma 2009, 67, 445–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, H.C.; Kwon, C.I.; El, H., II; Easler, J.J.; Watkins, J.; Fogel, E.L.; McHenry, L.; Sherman, S.; Zimmerman, M.K.; Lehman, G.A. Low serum pancreatic amylase and lipase values are simple and useful predictors to diagnose chronic pancreatitis. Gut Liver 2017, 11, 878–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, R.; Li, C.; Hu, D.; Xue, W.; Wu, T.; Mohan, C.; Peng, A. Hyperamylasemia as an early predictor of mortality in patients with acute paraquat poisoning. Med. Sci. Monit. 2016, 22, 1342–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boon, P.; de Reuck, J.; Achten, E.; de Bleecker, J. Pancreatic encephalopathy. A case report and review of the literature. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 1991, 93, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farkas, G.; Márton, J.; Nagy, Z.; Mándi, Y.; Takács, T.; Deli, M.A.; Abrahám, C.S. Experimental acute pancreatitis results in increased blood-brain barrier permeability in the rat: A potential role for tumor necrosis factor and interleukin 6. Neurosci. Lett. 1998, 242, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muniraj, T.; Dang, S.; Pitchumoni, C.S. Pancreatitis or not?--elevated lipase and amylase in icu patients. J. Crit. Care 2015, 30, 1370–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da, B.L.; Shulman, I.A.; Joy Lane, C.; Buxbaum, J. Origin, presentation, and clinical course of nonpancreatic hyperlipasemia. Pancreas 2016, 45, 846–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of the study. Abbreviations: TTM, targeted temperature management; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; CA, cardiac arrest.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of the study. Abbreviations: TTM, targeted temperature management; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; CA, cardiac arrest.
Figure 2.
Trends in serum amylase and lipase levels in patients with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels. Estimated means and standard errors obtained by linear mixed model are plotted on the y-axes. The solid lines represent the estimated means with vertical lines denoting the standard errors. Serum amylase (U/L) (A) and lipase (U/L) levels (B).
Figure 2.
Trends in serum amylase and lipase levels in patients with elevated pancreatic enzyme levels. Estimated means and standard errors obtained by linear mixed model are plotted on the y-axes. The solid lines represent the estimated means with vertical lines denoting the standard errors. Serum amylase (U/L) (A) and lipase (U/L) levels (B).
Figure 3.
Adjusted relationships between the maximum serum amylase or lipase levels within 24 h and neurologic outcome or 28-day mortality. Estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) obtained by multivariable logistic regression using restricted cubic splines are plotted on the y-axes. The solid lines represent the estimated adjusted ORs, with shaded ribbons denoting the 95% CIs. The horizontal dotted lines represent the OR of 1.0, which indicates the OR of maximum serum amylase at 345 U/L or lipase at 180 U/L. Relationships between maximum serum amylase and (A) neurologic outcome or (B) 28-day mortality and relationships between maximum lipase and (C) neurologic outcome or (D) 28-day mortality. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3.
Adjusted relationships between the maximum serum amylase or lipase levels within 24 h and neurologic outcome or 28-day mortality. Estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) obtained by multivariable logistic regression using restricted cubic splines are plotted on the y-axes. The solid lines represent the estimated adjusted ORs, with shaded ribbons denoting the 95% CIs. The horizontal dotted lines represent the OR of 1.0, which indicates the OR of maximum serum amylase at 345 U/L or lipase at 180 U/L. Relationships between maximum serum amylase and (A) neurologic outcome or (B) 28-day mortality and relationships between maximum lipase and (C) neurologic outcome or (D) 28-day mortality. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics, cardiac arrest-related information, and outcomes of patients with and without elevated serum amylase and/or lipase levels.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics, cardiac arrest-related information, and outcomes of patients with and without elevated serum amylase and/or lipase levels.
| All Patients | Non-Elevated Pancreatic Enzyme Levels | Elevated Pancreatic Enzyme Levels | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 355) | (n = 189, 53.2%) | (n = 166, 46.8%) | ||
| Patients’ demographic data | ||||
| Age (years) | 63.1 ± 15.6 | 61.5 ± 15.5 | 65.0 ± 15.6 | 0.03 |
| Sex, male | 266 (74.9) | 139 (73.5) | 127 (76.5) | 0.52 |
| Weight (kg) | 64.9 ± 12.4 | 64.7 ± 13.1 | 65.1 ± 11.6 | 0.77 |
| Height (cm) | 166.4 ± 9.0 | 166.7 ± 10.5 | 166.1 ± 7.2 | 0.53 |
| CA information | ||||
| Witnessed | 255 (71.8) | 142 (75.1) | 113 (68.1) | 0.14 |
| Bystander CPR | 248 (69.9) | 139 (73.5) | 109(65.7) | 0.11 |
| Shockable rhythm (VF/VT) | 138 (38.9) | 87 (46.0) | 51 (30.7) | 0.003 |
| Cardiac cause | 225 (63.4) | 127 (67.2) | 98 (59) | 0.11 |
| Time from collapse to ROSC (minutes) | 29.2 ± 20.6 | 25.1 ± 19.3 | 33.9 ± 21.0 | <0.001 |
| Total dose of epinephrine (mg) | 2.5 ± 3.2 | 2.1 ± 3.1 | 3.0 ± 3.3 | 0.01 |
| Comorbidities | ||||
| Hypertension | 135 (38) | 70 (37) | 65 (39.2) | 0.68 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 90 (25.4) | 46 (24.3) | 44 (26.5) | 0.64 |
| Coronary artery disease | 86 (24.2) | 38 (20.1) | 48 (28.9) | 0.053 |
| Cerebrovascular accident | 28 (7.9) | 10 (5.3) | 18 (10.8) | 0.053 |
| Pulmonary disease | 33 (9.3) | 20 (10.6) | 13 (7.8) | 0.37 |
| Renal disease | 46 (13) | 22 (11.6) | 24 (14.5) | 0.43 |
| Liver cirrhosis | 2 (0.6) | 0 | 2 (1.2) | 0.22 |
| Other cancer | 27 (7.7) | 17 (9) | 10 (6) | 0.29 |
| Laboratory test levels (U/L) | ||||
| Amylase at 0 h (n = 232) | 179.9 ± 362.6 | 95.3 ± 49.7 | 289.6 ± 526.5 | <0.001 |
| Amylase at 12 h (n = 333) | 422.1 ± 575.3 | 118.2 ± 71.4 | 775.2 ± 691.9 | <0.001 |
| Amylase at 24 h (n = 326) | 417.3 ± 510.3 | 116.2 ± 77.9 | 745.4 ± 575.9 | <0.001 |
| Maximum amylase | 487.4 ± 628.5 | 141.1 ± 80.2 | 881.7 ± 739.1 | <0.001 |
| Lipase at 0 h (n = 232) | 55.9 ± 87.5 | 42.5 ± 22.0 | 73.1 ± 127.9 | 0.004 |
| Lipase at 12 h (n = 331) | 69.2 ± 194.7 | 31.1 ± 24.2 | 112.9 ± 278.3 | <0.001 |
| Lipase at 24 h (n = 328) | 80.0 ± 209.8 | 29.2 ± 24.8 | 135.3 ± 292.7 | <0.001 |
| Maximum lipase | 108.0 ± 242.9 | 46.1 ± 29.7 | 178.5 ± 340.9 | <0.001 |
| Outcome | ||||
| Unfavorable neurologic outcome | 219 (61.7) | 84 (44.4) | 135 (81.3) | <0.001 |
| 28-day mortality | 141 (39.7) | 48 (25.4) | 93 (56) | <0.001 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or n (%). Abbreviations: CA, cardiac arrest; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation.
Table 2.
Multivariable logistic regression model for risk factors associated with elevated serum amylase and/or lipase levels.
Table 2.
Multivariable logistic regression model for risk factors associated with elevated serum amylase and/or lipase levels.
| OR | 95% CI | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shockable rhythm (VF/VT) | 0.62 | 0.39–0.98 | 0.04 |
| Time from collapse to ROSC (per minute) | 1.02 | 1.01–1.04 | <0.001 |
| Coronary artery disease | 1.7 | 1.01–2.87 | 0.046 |
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation.
Table 3.
Characteristics of the study population according to neurologic outcomes and 28-day mortality.
Table 3.
Characteristics of the study population according to neurologic outcomes and 28-day mortality.
| Neurologic Outcome | 28-Day Mortality | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Favorable | Unfavorable | p-Value | Survival | Death | p-Value | |
| (n = 136, 38.3%) | (n = 219, 61.7%) | (n = 214, 60.3%) | (n = 141, 39.7%) | |||
| Patients’ demographic data | ||||||
| Age (years) | 61.0 ± 14.9 | 64.5 ± 16.0 | 0.04 | 61.1 ± 15.8 | 66.2 ± 14.6 | 0.003 |
| Sex, male | 113 (83.1) | 153 (69.9) | 0.005 | 166 (77.6) | 100 (70.9) | 0.16 |
| Weight (kg) | 65.3 ± 13.4 | 64.7 ± 11.8 | 0.61 | 64.2 ± 13.1 | 65.9 ± 11.3 | 0.21 |
| Height (cm) | 167.9 ± 8.7 | 165.5 ± 9.2 | 0.01 | 167 ± 10.0 | 166 ± 7.4 | 0.43 |
| CA information | ||||||
| Witnessed | 112 (82.4) | 143 (65.3) | <0.001 | 170 (79.4) | 85 (60.3) | <0.001 |
| Bystander | 114 (83.8) | 134 (61.2) | <0.001 | 166 (77.6) | 82 (58.2) | <0.001 |
| Shockable rhythm (VF/VT) | 82 (60.3) | 56 (25.6) | <0.001 | 108 (50.5) | 30 (21.3) | <0.001 |
| Cardiac cause | 108 (79.4) | 117 (53.4) | <0.001 | 149 (69.6) | 76 (53.9) | 0.003 |
| Time from collapse to ROSC (minutes) | 18.8 ± 15.6 | 35.7 ± 20.7 | <0.001 | 23 ± 18.4 | 38.5 ± 20.2 | <0.001 |
| Total dose of epinephrine (mg) | 1.4 ± 2.7 | 3.2 ± 3.4 | <0.001 | 1.8 ± 2.7 | 3.6 ± 3.7 | <0.001 |
| Comorbidities | ||||||
| Hypertension | 50 (36.8) | 85 (38.8) | 0.7 | 76 (35.5) | 59 (41.8) | 0.23 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 26 (19.1) | 64 (29.2) | 0.03 | 43 (20.1) | 47 (33.3) | 0.005 |
| Coronary artery disease | 38 (27.9) | 48 (21.9) | 0.2 | 53 (24.8) | 33 (23.4) | 0.77 |
| Cerebrovascular accident | 8 (5.9) | 20 (9.1) | 0.27 | 11 (5.1) | 17 (12.1) | 0.02 |
| Pulmonary disease | 9 (6.6) | 24 (11.0) | 0.17 | 20 (9.3) | 13 (9.2) | 0.97 |
| Renal disease | 6 (4.4) | 40 (18.3) | <0.001 | 19 (8.9) | 27 (19.1) | 0.005 |
| Liver cirrhosis | 0 | 2 (0.9) | 0.53 | 0 | 2 (1.4) | 0.16 |
| Other cancer | 8 (5.9) | 19 (8.7) | 0.33 | 15 (7.0) | 12 (8.5) | 0.60 |
| Laboratory test levels (U/L) | ||||||
| Amylase at 0 h (n = 232) | 106.8 ± 66.9 | 236.9 ± 473.0 | 0.001 | 120.6 ± 92.3 | 274.3 ± 560.8 | <0.001 |
| Amylase at 12 h (n = 333) | 225.7 ± 295.8 | 544.6 ± 667.0 | <0.001 | 328.3 ± 493.7 | 572.2 ± 660.9 | 0.001 |
| Amylase at 24 h (n = 326) | 224.9 ± 269.7 | 540.1 ± 585.0 | <0.001 | 332.0 ± 482.6 | 554.4 ± 525.5 | 0.03 |
| Maximum amylase | 258.7 ± 297.5 | 629.5 ± 730.5 | <0.001 | 375.8 ± 538.9 | 656.8 ± 713.4 | 0.001 |
| Lipase at 0 h (n = 232) | 45.0 ± 36.8 | 64.4 ± 111.4 | 0.12 | 47.6 ± 37.9 | 69.2 ± 131.6 | 0.048 |
| Lipase at 12 h (n = 331) | 68.8 ± 224.0 | 69.4 ± 174.2 | 0.59 | 67.5 ± 224.2 | 71.9 ± 135.1 | 0.84 |
| Lipase at 24 h (n = 328) | 45.3 ± 88.2 | 101.9 ± 256.6 | <0.001 | 58.8 ± 161.9 | 113.9 ± 266.7 | 0.001 |
| Maximum Lipase | 86.9 ± 219.7 | 121.1 ± 255.9 | 0.098 | 90.8 ± 224.4 | 134.1 ± 267.3 | 0.045 |
| Elevated pancreatic enzyme levels | ||||||
| None | 105 (77.2) | 84 (38.4) | 141 (65.9) | 48 (34.0) | ||
| Amylase alone | 22 (16.2) | 105 (47.9) | <0.001 a | 55 (25.7) | 72 (51.1) | <0.001 a |
| Lipase alone | 5 (3.7) | 8 (3.7) | 0.29 a | 7 (3.3) | 6 (4.3) | 0.11 a |
| Both | 4 (2.9) | 22 (10.0) | <0.001 a | 11 (5.1) | 15 (10.6) | 0.001 a |
| Post-CA shock | 97 (71.3) | 188 (85.8) | 0.001 | 157 (73.4) | 128 (90.8) | <0.001 |
| CRRT | 8 (5.9) | 63 (28.8) | <0.001 | 22 (10.3) | 49 (34.8) | <0.001 |
| ECMO | 13 (9.6) | 26 (11.9) | 0.5 | 18 (8.4) | 21 (14.9) | 0.06 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or n (%); a frequency is reported in comparison with non-elevated pancreatic enzyme levels. Abbreviations: CA, cardiac arrest; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Table 4.
Factors associated with unfavorable neurologic outcomes and 28-day mortality in the multivariable analysis.
Table 4.
Factors associated with unfavorable neurologic outcomes and 28-day mortality in the multivariable analysis.
| CPC | Mortality | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | p-Value | OR | 95% CI | p-Value | |
| Sex, male | 2.96 | 1.20–7.28 | 0.02 | |||
| Witnessed | 0.51 | 0.28–0.91 | 0.02 | |||
| Bystander | 0.39 | 0.19–0.81 | 0.01 | |||
| Shockable rhythm (VF/VT) | 0.44 | 0.22–0.85 | 0.01 | 0.48 | 0.25–0.94 | 0.03 |
| Time from collapse to ROSC (per minute) | 1.05 | 1.04–1.07 | <0.001 | 1.04 | 1.02–1.05 | <0.001 |
| Cardiac cause | 0.26 | 0.12–0.53 | <0.001 | |||
| Elevated pancreatic enzyme levels | ||||||
| Amylase alone | 6.03 | 3.03–12.00 | <0.001 a | 2.8 | 1.58–4.93 | <0.001 a |
| Lipase alone | 0.56 | 0.09–3.37 | 0.52 a | 1.05 | 0.24–4.56 | 0.94 a |
| Both | 7.08 | 1.73–29.02 | 0.007 a | 2.05 | 0.73–5.77 | 0.17 a |
| Post-CA shock | 2.78 | 1.12–6.92 | 0.03 | |||
| CRRT | 3.77 | 1.22–11.65 | 0.02 | 4.05 | 1.69–9.72 | 0.002 |
a OR is reported in comparison with nonelevated pancreatic enzyme levels. Abbreviations: CPC, cerebral performance category; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; CA, cardiac arrest; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Park, S.Y.; Kim, M.J.; Park, I.; Kim, H.Y.; Lee, M.; Park, Y.S.; Chung, S.P. Predisposing Factors and Neurologic Outcomes of Patients with Elevated Serum Amylase and/or Lipase after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051426
AMA Style
Park SY, Kim MJ, Park I, Kim HY, Lee M, Park YS, Chung SP. Predisposing Factors and Neurologic Outcomes of Patients with Elevated Serum Amylase and/or Lipase after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(5):1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051426
Chicago/Turabian StylePark, Shin Young, Min Joung Kim, Incheol Park, Ha Yan Kim, Myeongjee Lee, Yoo Seok Park, and Sung Phil Chung. 2022. "Predisposing Factors and Neurologic Outcomes of Patients with Elevated Serum Amylase and/or Lipase after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 5: 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051426
APA StylePark, S. Y., Kim, M. J., Park, I., Kim, H. Y., Lee, M., Park, Y. S., & Chung, S. P. (2022). Predisposing Factors and Neurologic Outcomes of Patients with Elevated Serum Amylase and/or Lipase after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(5), 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051426
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
