Next Article in Journal
The Future of Adhesion Prophylaxis Trials in Abdominal Surgery: An Expert Global Consensus
Next Article in Special Issue
Using Corneal Confocal Microscopy to Identify Therapeutic Agents for Diabetic Neuropathy
Previous Article in Journal
Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management of Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: A Practical Review of Current Approaches
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/jcm11061475
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Corneal Confocal Microscopy and the Nervous System: Introduction to the Special Issue

by
Rayaz A. Malik
1 and
Nathan Efron
2,*
1
Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Research Division, Qatar Foundation, Education City, Doha 24144, Qatar
2
School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(6), 1475; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061475
Submission received: 1 March 2022 / Accepted: 5 March 2022 / Published: 8 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corneal Confocal Microscopy and the Nervous System)
Versions Notes

1. Introduction

The heretical idea that corneal confocal microscopy (CCM)—an ophthalmic instrument—could be used to assess neurological disease emerged around the turn of the 21st century. CCM allows the corneal ultrastructure to be examined in vivo at 700× magnification; the standard clinical instrument used for examining the cornea—the slip-lamp biomicroscope—only has a maximum magnification of 40×. Thus, CCM has enabled the discovery of previously unknown features of the cornea and the observation of known features at much higher magnifications and resolutions—a true revolution in ophthalmic science.
The repurposing of CCM to study diabetic neuropathy in the first instance, and, subsequently, a broader array of neurological disorders, is a wonderful illustration of challenging dogma in medicine.
We are delighted to write this cover editorial, which provides an overview of the past, present and future of CCM as a tool for investigating the nervous system. This editorial is unapologetically somewhat of a personal account, given our deep involvement in the development of this application from almost the beginning.

2. Discovering CCM

The optical principles of confocal microscopy were described by Minsky in 1955, who cited his rationale for developing this device “to better understand the interconnection of nerve cells” [1]. The first functional microscope was developed by Petran et al. [2] in 1960, but it was not until 1988 that Dilly [3] demonstrated how the device developed by Petran et al. could be mounted horizontally and used to examine the human cornea in vivo. The first scans were captured from Dilly’s own eye [3].
As an academic optometrist with a research interest in the impact of contact lenses on the cornea, I (N.E.) first learned about CCM at a contact lens conference in Hawaii, USA, in August 1988. I sat in on a lecture by ophthalmologist Dwight Cavanagh, who had very recently developed his own CCM. Coincidentally, Dilly’s seminal CCM paper [3] was published during the same week as this conference, but I had not seen it.
Renowned for his often flowery and effusive oratory, Cavanagh stepped up to the podium and commenced his lecture with a profound statement that stunned the audience: “It’s very rare in one’s life to ever be a part of something that’s really fundamental in science that changes the way everything is done. I guess there are points like that in the history of science, when Isaac Newton saw the apple fall off the tree, when Galileo Galilei looked through his first telescope, and when Antonie van Leeuwenhoek found the little animals in pond water; but believe me … confocal microscopy is one of those branch points in science, not just cell biology or ophthalmology or optometry or contact lenses. It is a new paradigm, a … microscope that lets us see things nobody else has ever been able to see before” [4].
Cavanagh proceeded to show images of the cornea obtained using CCM, which ‘blew me away’. I (N.E.) immediately saw the potential application of CCM to help understand the ocular response to contact lens wear. At great expense, I managed to obtain one of the first commercially available CCM instruments—the Tomey ConfoScan Confocal Microscope Model P4 (Tomey, Erlangen, Germany)—soon after it came onto the market in 1996.
I first spent a few weeks scanning the corneas of fellow researchers. One feature of corneal anatomy in particular that caught my attention was the sub-basal nerve plexus. This plexus was known to exist from ex vivo histological studies but had never before been seen in the living human eye. Recognizing the importance of this anatomical feature, I conducted a study with graduate optometry student Laura Oliveira-Soto, describing the morphology of the sub-basal nerve plexus in great detail [5].

3. Translating CCM from Ophthalmology to Neurology

No sooner had our paper describing the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus been published, on 1 May 2001 [5], than my annual review was due with my diabetes doctor, who happened to be Professor Andrew Boulton at the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Having gained weight and been less than attentive with my glycaemic control, more so to distract him, I handed him a copy of this paper [5]. At the time, I was unaware that Andrew was a noted authority on diabetic peripheral neuropathy (I had never Googled him to find out his academic interests). Naturally, therefore, Andrew was very interested, but he was time-poor; so, on 14 June 2001, he wrote me a letter stating: “Turning now to your controcal [sic] microscope … Rayaz [Malik] and I could possibly visit your Centre … and think of some collaborative work in diabetic neuropathy” [6].
When I met R.M., he was skeptical at first (“these are 5th cranial nerves, but I am more interested in small peripheral nerves”); nevertheless, he suggested we use CCM to assess a small cohort of diabetic patients. Recruitment was initially slow, as R.M. relied on patients in his clinic making their own way across the city to UMIST to undergo CCM. However, the study was rapidly completed when he offered to drive them personally to UMIST in his Porsche! This was the beginning of an extremely fruitful collaboration which enabled us to effectively translate CCM from the world of ophthalmology/optometry to neurology. Thus, I (N.E.) found myself to be in the right place, at the right time, working with the right people, and asking the right questions.
As an aside, I (N.E.) have continued with contact lens research alongside my diabetes/neurology research; CCM has also turned out to be a valuable tool for understanding the response of the cornea to contact lens wear [7], which was my original reason for obtaining a CCM.

4. According Precedence

The paper by Laura Oliveira-Soto and N.E. describing the detailed anatomy of corneal sub-basal nerves [5] was submitted to the journal Cornea in September 2000. In this paper, we concluded, “This study provides convincing evidence of the suitability of confocal microscopy to image corneal nerves”, and “Future studies should investigate the … morphology and architecture of corneal nerves in … diabetic patients …” [5].
In October 2000, Rosenberg et al. published a paper [8] which used a tandem scanning confocal microscope to show a progressive loss of long nerve fibre bundles with increasing severity of diabetic neuropathy; they concluded “Confocal microscopy appears to allow early detection of beginning neuropathy” [8]. In science, precedence must be accorded to those who publish first, so without doubt, credit must go to Rosenberg et al. [8] for being the first to describe corneal nerve loss in diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
We (R.M. and N.E.) had commenced our study in patients with diabetes in August 2001 and applied rigorous morphometric techniques, which R.M. had learnt from quantifying myelinated and unmyelinated nerve fibers in sural nerve biopsies from patients with diabetic neuropathy [9], to quantify corneal nerve fiber morphology. Our paper [10], which was submitted to Diabetologia in November 2002 and published in May 2003, rather ambitiously concluded “Corneal confocal microscopy is a rapid, non-invasive in vivo clinical examination technique which accurately defines the extent of corneal nerve damage and repair and acts as a surrogate measure of somatic neuropathy in diabetic patients. It could represent an advance to define the severity of neuropathy and expedite assessment of therapeutic efficacy in clinical trials of human diabetic neuropathy” [10].

5. CCM in Diabetic Neuropathy

We initially secured an innovation grant from the JDRF to build on our pilot data to show that CCM could identify diabetic patients with sub-clinical neuropathy and progressive worsening with increasing severity of diabetic neuropathy. Given the reluctance/hostility amongst some in the neurology community to accept that an ophthalmic instrument quantifying ‘short cranial nerves’ could reflect a dying back neuropathy affecting ‘long sensory nerves’, we knew we had to secure further financial support to increase the size of the cohorts, establish longitudinal change, and demonstrate response to interventions.
We were fortunate to secure an RO1 grant from the NIDDK and a substantial grant from the JDRF to conduct the LANDMARK study (Longitudinal Assessment of Neuropathy in Diabetes using novel ophthalmic MARKers) [11]. This study generated valuable cross-sectional and longitudinal CCM, neurological and general medical data on 231 type 1 and 2 diabetic patients with and without neuropathy, and 61 non-diabetic subjects, all of which served as a valuable contemporary control and historic reference set for future work.
Subsequent funding from the NIDDK enabled the establishment of an international consortium, which combined data from ~1000 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance and showed that CCM has excellent diagnostic [12,13] and prognostic [14] value and could detect early nerve regeneration after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes [15,16]. Age-adjusted normative values for CCM were established [17], and we showed that the severity of corneal nerve loss and associated risk factors are different for type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients [18].
Corneal nerve loss is found in children [19,20] and adults [21] with type 1 diabetes, prior to developing retinopathy and microalbuminuria, and in patients with impaired glucose tolerance [22,23] and type 2 diabetes that has been recently diagnosed [24]. Painful diabetic neuropathy is associated with greater corneal nerve loss at the inferior whorl [25] and is related to pain severity [26]. Corneal nerve loss is evident in patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy [27,28,29,30,31] and in men with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and erectile dysfunction [32,33]. Reduced corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL) predicts 4-year incident diabetic peripheral neuropathy [34,35]. A more rapid decline in CNFL has been associated with the development of diabetic peripheral neuropathy [36] and Charcot foot with foot ulceration [37].

6. CCM in Synergy with Other Ophthalmic Markers of Diabetic Neuropathy

Our work with the CCM led us to develop a more comprehensive neurological model incorporating other ophthalmic markers of diabetic peripheral neuropathy [38]. We demonstrated a commensurate loss of corneal sensitivity [39]. We also hypothesised that, given that the fifth cranial nerve is impacted, other ocular cranial nerves, such as the second (optic) cranial nerve, could also be involved. Our subsequent investigations using the newly developed technique of optical coherence tomography demonstrated significant thinning of the retinal nerve fibre layer in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy [40]. We also found a commensurate loss in visual sensitivity with the central 30° of the visual field in these patients [41].

7. CCM in Other Peripheral Neuropathies

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is characterised by pain and reduced quality of life and can lead to dose reduction or discontinuation from chemotherapy. Corneal nerve loss is observed in patients with various forms of cancer, and recovery has been demonstrated following chemotherapy [42,43,44].
Stettner et al. [45] showed significant corneal nerve loss and an increase in dendritic cells in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, and monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance, which were associated with disease severity and pain. Increased corneal inflammatory cells predict disease progression with high sensitivity [46,47]. Corneal nerve loss occurs in patients with HIV-associated neuropathy [48]. Corneal nerve fractal dimension may differentiate HIV neuropathy from diabetic neuropathy [49]. Idiopathic small fibre neuropathy [50] is associated with significant corneal nerve loss [51], with an increased detection rate for this condition using CCM [52].
Corneal nerve loss occurs in patients with Charcot Marie Tooth disease type 1A [53] and in severe peripheral neuropathy associated with a rare nerve growth factor-β mutation [54]. We have also demonstrated corneal nerve loss in patients with Friedreich’s ataxia [55] and neurofibromatosis type 1 [56].
The fatal inherited disorder, transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy, is characterized by a progressive neuropathy and cardiomyopathy [57]; CNFL is reduced in patients with this condition [58] and has good diagnostic utility [59].
Patients with Fabry’s disease demonstrate small fibre neuropathy as a result of nerve damage induced by globotriaosylceramide (GI3) [60]. Corneal nerve loss is demonstrated in patients with Fabry disease [61], which is correlated with disease severity [62]. Corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD) was reduced in patients with hypothyroidism but improved after levo-thyroxine treatment [63]. In patients with fibromyalgia, stromal nerve thinning reduced sub-basal nerve fibre density and was related to a variety of pain descriptors [64,65,66,67].

8. CCM in Central Neurodegenerative Disease

A number of studies have recently investigated whether corneal nerve loss could serve as a surrogate marker of neurodegeneration in central neurodegenerative diseases. Parkinson’s disease (PD) is associated with reduced corneal sensitivity and compromised corneal nerve morphology [68,69,70].
In patients with PD, loss of corneal nerves is associated with the severity of cognitive dysfunction [71] and with altered trigeminal nerve white matter diffusion properties [72]. Altered corneal nerve morphology has been shown in patients with PD [73]. We have confirmed corneal nerve fibre loss in PD [74], with CNFD demonstrating excellent diagnostic utility [75]. A lower CNFL predicts progressive worsening of UPDRS-III over 12 months in patients with PD [76], suggesting the application of CCM in diagnosing pre-motor PD.
Four recent studies [77,78,79] have demonstrated reduced sub-basal corneal nerve density in patients with multiple sclerosis. Corneal nerve loss is also associated with the bulbar function disability score in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [80] and with disease severity and progression [81].
Corneal nerve loss occurs in patients with transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke [82], major stroke [83], and recurrent stroke [84] and is associated with the presence of white matter hyperintensities [85]. In patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia, corneal nerve fibre loss is associated with the degree of cognitive impairment and physical disability [86,87]. The severity of cerebral ischemia is associated with cognitive impairment, brain atrophy, and corneal nerve loss in mild cognitive impairment and dementia [88].
Corneal nerve fibre density and length are reduced in patients with migraine [89], trigeminal neuralgia [90,91], and burning mouth syndrome [92].

9. CCM in Clinical Trials

Corneal nerve fibers have been shown to regenerate 6 months after simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes [93]. We have also shown corneal nerve regeneration 24 months after an improvement in glycemia, blood pressure, and lipids [94] and 12 months after SPK transplantation; there were no changes in symptoms, neurophysiology, quantitative sensory testing, or skin biopsy results [15]. We have more recently shown increased CNFL 12 months after SPK transplantation followed by improved neuropathic symptoms after 24 months and neurophysiology after 36 months [16].
We have demonstrated with CCM that there is a recovery of small-fiber neuropathy in type 1 diabetes subjects using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion compared with those using multiple daily injection [95].
Bariatric surgery improves in corneal nerve morphology in obese subjects with [96] and without [97] diabetes. A new anti-inflammatory peptide, ARA290-Cibinetide, improves corneal nerve morphology in patients with sarcoidosis-related neuropathy [98,99] and type 2 diabetes [100], with commensurate improvement in pain scores. Improvement in corneal nerve morphology strongly correlates with the GAP-43+ expression in skin biopsies, indicating intraepidermal nerve fibre repair and with an improvement in pain intensity after 28 days [99].
Seal oil omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid increased CNFL, with no change in nerve conduction velocity and sensory function over 12 months, in patients with type 1 diabetes [101]. Omega-3 fatty acid was also found to increase CNFL in patients with type 1 diabetes after 180 days, without change in thermal thresholds, autonomic function, or nerve conduction studies [102].
In a 12-month study of weekly GLP-1 or basal bolus insulin, corneal nerve regeneration occurred, but there was no change in vibration perception or sudomotor function [103].

10. Future Developments of CCM

Several slit scanning in vivo CCMs are commercially available, including Tomey Corporation (Cambridge, MA, USA), Nidek Technologies (Gamagori, Japan) and Helmut Hund (Wetzlar, Germany), but they have limited image resolution for the sub-basal nerve plexus. The laser-scanning CCM (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph III Rostock Corneal Module, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) is capable of generating very high resolution and high contrast images of sub-basal nerves. Looking to the future, a non-contact CCM would make image acquisition easier and facilitate widespread clinical application; a non-contact attachment for the Heidelberg instrument has been developed [104], but image acquisition of the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus is very difficult [104].
A limitation of CCM is its small field of view, and some centers have used wide-field imaging to create maps of the sub-basal nerve plexus [105,106,107]. The main morphological parameters quantified include corneal nerve fiber density, branch density, fiber length, and inferior whorl length [108,109]. Corneal nerve fractal dimension analysis [49] may help to differentiate neuropathies of differing aetiology [110]. To expedite unbiased corneal nerve quantification, CCMetrics and ACCMetrics are freely available software for manual, semi-automated, and fully automated quantification of sub-basal corneal nerves [111,112]. Novel artificial-intelligence-based algorithms have also been developed for fully automated corneal nerve quantification [113] and disease severity classification in diabetic neuropathy [114].

11. Bibliometrics of CCM Research for Assessing Corneal Nerves in Neuropathy

There has been an almost exponential growth of research into use of CCM to assess corneal nerves in patients with various forms of ophthalmic and systemic neuropathy. To illustrate this, we searched the Scopus database on 1 March 2022, for papers published since 2000, using the following search term:
TITLE-ABS-KEY(cornea*) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY(“confocal microscop*”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY(nerv* OR neura* OR neuro*) AND (PUBYEAR > 1999) AND (LIMIT-TO(LANGUAGE, “English”)) AND (LIMIT-TO(SRCTYPE, “j”))
A total of 1343 papers were captured by this search. These papers have collectively attracted 37,304 citations and have been published in >160 journals by >160 authors from >160 institutions (Scopus caps counts at 160) in 63 countries. Only 10 papers were published in year 2000 versus 179 in 2021 (i.e., more than 3 papers per week in 2021).
Although CCM was originally intended for ophthalmic research, the majority of papers captured appear to relate to systemic rather than ocular neuropathy. The five most prolific authors, who all happen to work primarily in the field of systemic neuropathy, are R.M. (163 papers), Ioannis Petropoulos (77), N.E. (74), George Ponirakis (62), and Maryam Ferdousi (53). The field as defined by the above search term has a h-index of 90.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.A.M. and N.E.; writing—original draft preparation R.A.M. and N.E.; writing—review and editing, R.A.M. and N.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Minsky, M. Memoir on inventing the confocal scanning microscope. Scanning 1988, 10, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Petráň, M.; Hadravský, M.; Egger, D.; Galambos, R. Tandem-scanning reflected-light microscope. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1968, 5, 661–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dilly, P.N. Tandem scanning reflected light microscopy of the cornea. Scanning 1988, 10, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cavanagh, D.H. Research techniques and methods: Current frontiers (section 7). In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium of the International Society of Contact Lens Research, Kauai, HI, USA, 31 August–3 September 1988; pp. 310–311. [Google Scholar]
  5. Oliveira-Soto, L.; Efron, N. Morphology of corneal nerves using confocal microscopy. Cornea 2001, 20, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Boulton, A.J.M.; (University of Manchester, Manchester, UK). Personal communication, 2001.
  7. Efron, N. Contact lens-induced changes in the anterior eye as observed in vivo with the confocal microscope. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2007, 26, 398–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rosenberg, M.E.; Tervo, T.M.; Immonen, I.J.; Müller, L.J.; Grönhagen-Riska, C.; Vesaluoma, M.H. Corneal structure and sensitivity in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41, 2915–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Malik, R.A.; Newrick, P.G.; Sharma, A.K.; Jennings, A.; Ah-See, A.K.; Mayhew, T.M.; Jakubowski, J.; Boulton, A.J.; Ward, J.D. Microangiopathy in human diabetic neuropathy: Relationship between capillary abnormalities and the severity of neuropathy. Diabetologia 1989, 32, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Malik, R.A.; Kallinikos, P.; Abbott, C.A.; van Schie, C.H.M.; Morgan, P.; Efron, N.; Boulton, A.J.M. Corneal confocal microscopy: A non-invasive surrogate of nerve fibre damage and repair in diabetic patients. Diabetologia 2003, 46, 683–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Edwards, K.; Pritchard, N.; Vagenas, D.; Russell, A.; Malik, R.A.; Efron, N. Utility of corneal confocal microscopy for assessing mild diabetic neuropathy: Baseline findings of the LANDMark study. Clin. Exp. Optom. 2012, 95, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Perkins, B.A.; Lovblom, L.E.; Bril, V.; Scarr, D.; Ostrovski, I.; Orszag, A.; Edwards, K.; Pritchard, N.; Russell, A.; Dehghani, C.; et al. Corneal confocal microscopy for identification of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy: A pooled multinational consortium study. Diabetologia 2018, 61, 1856–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Gad, H.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Khan, A.; Ponirakis, G.; MacDonald, R.; Alam, U.; Malik, R.A. Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Diabetes Investig. 2022, 13, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Perkins, B.A.; Lovblom, L.E.; Lewis, E.J.H.; Bril, V.; Ferdousi, M.; Orszag, A.; Edwards, K.; Pritchard, N.; Russell, A.; Dehghani, C.; et al. Corneal confocal microscopy predicts the development of diabetic neuropathy: A longitudinal diagnostic multinational consortium study. Diabetes Care 2021, 44, 2107–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tavakoli, M.; Mitu-Pretorian, M.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Fadavi, H.; Asghar, O.; Alam, U.; Ponirakis, G.; Jeziorska, M.; Marshall, A.; Efron, N.; et al. Corneal confocal microscopy detects early nerve regeneration in diabetic neuropathy after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. Diabetes 2013, 62, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Azmi, S.; Jeziorska, M.; Ferdousi, M.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Ponirakis, G.; Marshall, A.; Alam, U.; Asghar, O.; Atkinson, A.; Jones, W.; et al. Early nerve fibre regeneration in individuals with type 1 diabetes after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. Diabetologia 2019, 62, 1478–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Tavakoli, M.; Ferdousi, M.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Morris, J.; Pritchard, N.; Zhivov, A.; Ziegler, D.; Pacaud, D.; Romanchuk, K.; Perkins, B.A.; et al. Normative values for corneal nerve morphology assessed using corneal confocal microscopy: A multinational normative data set. Diabetes Care 2015, 38, 838–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ferdousi, M.; Kalteniece, A.; Azmi, S.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Ponirakis, G.; Alam, U.; Asghar, O.; Marshall, A.; Fullwood, C.; Jeziorska, M.; et al. Diagnosis of neuropathy and risk factors for corneal nerve loss in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: A corneal confocal microscopy study. Diabetes Care 2021, 44, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ferdousi, M.; Romanchuk, K.; Mah, J.K.; Virtanen, H.; Millar, C.; Malik, R.A.; Pacaud, D. Early corneal nerve fibre damage and increased Langerhans cell density in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gad, H.; Al-Jarrah, B.; Saraswathi, S.; Petropoulos, I.A.; Ponirakis, G.; Khan, A.; Singh, P.; Al Khodor, S.; Elawad, M.; Almasri, W.; et al. Corneal nerve loss in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus without retinopathy or microalbuminuria. J. Diabetes Investig. 2020, 11, 1594–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Petropoulos, I.N.; Green, P.; Chan, A.W.; Alam, U.; Fadavi, H.; Marshall, A.; Asghar, O.; Efron, N.; Tavakoli, M.; Malik, R.A. Corneal confocal microscopy detects neuropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes without retinopathy or microalbuminuria. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Asghar, O.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Alam, U.; Jones, W.; Jeziorska, M.; Marshall, A.; Ponirakis, G.; Fadavi, H.; Boulton, A.J.M.; Tavakoli, M.; et al. Corneal confocal microscopy detects neuropathy in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care 2014, 37, 2643–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. De Clerck, E.E.B.; Schouten, J.S.A.G.; Berendschot, T.T.J.M.; Koolschijn, R.S.; Nuijts, R.M.M.A.; Schram, M.T.; Schaper, N.C.; Henry, R.M.A.; Dagnelie, P.C.; Ruggeri, A.; et al. Reduced corneal nerve fibre length in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: The Maastricht Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020, 98, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ziegler, D.; Papanas, N.; Zhivov, A.; Allgeier, S.; Winter, K.; Ziegler, I.; Brüggemann, J.; Strom, A.; Peschel, S.; Köhler, B.; et al. Early detection of nerve fiber loss by corneal confocal microscopy and skin biopsy in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2014, 63, 2454–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kalteniece, A.; Ferdousi, M.; Azmi, S.; Mubita, W.M.; Marshall, A.; Lauria, G.; Faber, C.G.; Soran, H.; Malik, R.A. Corneal confocal microscopy detects small nerve fibre damage in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kalteniece, A.; Ferdousi, M.; Azmi, S.; Ullah Khan, S.; Worthington, A.; Marshall, A.; Faber, C.G.; Lauria, G.; Boulton, A.J.M.; Soran, H.; et al. Corneal nerve loss is related to the severity of painful diabetic neuropathy. Eur. J. Neurol. 2022, 29, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Maddaloni, E.; Sabatino, F.; Del Toro, R.; Crugliano, S.; Grande, S.; Lauria Pantano, A.; Maurizi, A.R.; Palermo, A.; Bonini, S.; Pozzilli, P.; et al. In vivo corneal confocal microscopy as a novel non-invasive tool to investigate cardiac autonomic neuropathy in Type 1 diabetes. Diabet. Med. 2015, 32, 262–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, H.; Fan, D.; Wang, W.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X. Early diagnosis of diabetic autonomic neuropathy by corneal confocal microscopy. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2015, 95, 2851–2856. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ishibashi, F.; Kojima, R.; Taniguchi, M.; Kosaka, A.; Uetake, H.; Tavakoli, M. The preferential impairment of pupil constriction stimulated by blue light in patients with type 2 diabetes without autonomic neuropathy. J. Diabetes Res. 2017, 2017, 6069730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Misra, S.L.; Craig, J.P.; Patel, D.V.; McGhee, C.N.J.; Pradhan, M.; Ellyell, K.; Kilfoyle, D.; Braatvedt, G.D. In vivo confocal microscopy of corneal nerves: An ocular biomarker for peripheral and cardiac autonomic neuropathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 5060–5065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tavakoli, M.; Begum, P.; McLaughlin, J.; Malik, R.A. Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2015, 52, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Azmi, S.; Ferdousi, M.; Alam, U.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Ponirakis, G.; Marshall, A.; Asghar, O.; Fadavi, H.; Jones, W.; Tavakoli, M.; et al. Small-fibre neuropathy in men with type 1 diabetes and erectile dysfunction: A cross-sectional study. Diabetologia 2017, 60, 1094–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Dhage, S.; Ho, J.H.; Ferdousi, M.; Kalteniece, A.; Azmi, S.; Adam, S.; Marshall, A.; Jeziorska, M.; Donn, R.; Soran, H.; et al. Small fibre pathology is associated with erectile dysfunction in men with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2020, 36, e3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pritchard, N.; Edwards, K.; Russell, A.W.; Perkins, B.A.; Malik, R.A.; Efron, N. Corneal confocal microscopy predicts 4-year incident peripheral neuropathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015, 38, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Lovblom, L.E.; Halpern, E.M.; Wu, T.; Kelly, D.; Ahmed, A.; Boulet, G.; Orszag, A.; Ng, E.; Ngo, M.; Bril, V.; et al. In vivo corneal confocal microscopy and prediction of future-incident neuropathy in type 1 diabetes: A preliminary longitudinal analysis. Can. J. Diabetes 2015, 39, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lewis, E.J.H.; Lovblom, L.E.; Ferdousi, M.; Halpern, E.M.; Jeziorska, M.; Pacaud, D.; Pritchard, N.; Dehghani, C.; Edwards, K.; Srinivasan, S.; et al. Rapid corneal nerve fiber loss: A marker of diabetic neuropathy onset and progression. Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 1829–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dehghani, C.; Russell, A.W.; Perkins, B.A.; Malik, R.A.; Pritchard, N.; Edwards, M.; Shahidi, A.M.; Srinivasan, S.; Efron, N. A rapid decline in corneal small fibers and occurrence of foot ulceration and Charcot foot. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2016, 30, 1437–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Efron, N. The Glenn, A. Fry award lecture 2010: Ophthalmic markers of diabetic neuropathy. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2011, 88, 661–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Tavakoli, M.; Kallinikos, P.A.; Efron, N.; Boulton, A.J.M.; Malik, R.A. Corneal sensitivity is reduced and relates to the severity of neuropathy in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007, 30, 1895–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Shahidi, A.M.; Sampson, G.P.; Pritchard, N.; Edwards, K.; Vagenas, D.; Russell, A.W.; Malik, R.A.; Efron, N. Retinal nerve fibre layer thinning associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Diabet. Med. 2012, 29, e106-111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sampson, G.P.; Shahidi, A.M.; Vagenas, D.; Pritchard, N.; Edwards, K.; Russell, A.; Malik, R.A.; Efron, N. Visual sensitivity loss in the central thirty degrees of visual field is associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Diabetologia 2012, 55, 1179–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Ferdousi, M.; Azmi, S.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Fadavi, H.; Ponirakis, G.; Marshall, A.; Tavakoli, M.; Malik, I.; Mansoor, A.; Malik, R.A. Corneal confocal microscopy detects small fibre neuropathy in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer and nerve regeneration in chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0139394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Bennedsgaard, K.; Ventzel, L.; Andersen, N.T.; Themistocleous, A.C.; Bennett, D.L.; Jensen, T.S.; Tankisi, H.; Finnerup, N.B. Oxaliplatin- and docetaxel-induced polyneuropathy: Clinical and neurophysiological characteristics. J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst. 2020, 25, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chiang, J.C.B.; Goldstein, D.; Trinh, T.; Au, K.; Mizrahi, D.; Muhlmann, M.; Crowe, P.; O’Neill, S.; Edwards, K.; Park, S.B.; et al. A cross-sectional study of sub-basal corneal nerve reduction following neurotoxic chemotherapy. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Stettner, M.; Hinrichs, L.; Guthoff, R.; Bairov, S.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Warnke, C.; Hartung, H.P.; Malik, R.A.; Kieseier, B.C. Corneal confocal microscopy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2016, 3, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Motte, J.; Grüter, T.; Fisse, A.L.; Bulut, Y.; Stykova, Z.; Greiner, T.; Enax-Krumova, E.; Yoon, M.S.; Gold, R.; Tegenthoff, M.; et al. Corneal inflammatory cell infiltration predicts disease activity in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pitarokoili, K.; Sturm, D.; Labedi, A.; Greiner, T.; Eitner, L.; Kumowski, N.; Enax-Krumova, E.K.; Fisse, A.L.; Maier, C.; Gold, R.; et al. Neuroimaging markers of clinical progression in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2019, 12, 1756286419855485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kemp, H.I.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Rice, A.S.; Vollert, J.; Maier, C.; Strum, D.; Schargus, M.; Peto, D.; Hau, S.; Chopra, R.; et al. Use of corneal confocal microscopy to evaluate small nerve fibers in patients with human immunodeficiency virus. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017, 135, 795–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, X.; Graham, J.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Ponirakis, G.; Asghar, O.; Alam, U.; Marshall, A.; Ferdousi, M.; Azmi, S.; Efron, N.; et al. Corneal nerve fractal dimension: A novel corneal nerve metric for the diagnosis of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 1113–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Freeman, R.; Gewandter, J.S.; Faber, C.G.; Gibbons, C.; Haroutounion, S.; Laura, G.; Levine, T.; Malik, R.A.; Singleton, J.R.; Smith, A.G.; et al. Idiopathic distal sensory polyneuropathy: ACTTION diagnostic criteria. Neurology 2020, 95, 1005–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tavakoli, M.; Marshall, A.; Pitceathly, R.; Fadavi, H.; Gow, D.; Roberts, M.M.; Efron, N.; Boulton, A.J.M.; Malik, R.A. Corneal confocal microscopy: A novel means to detect nerve fibre damage in idiopathic small fibre neuropathy. Exp. Neurol. 2010, 223, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Egenolf, N.; Zu Altenschildesche, C.M.; Kreß, L.; Eggermann, K.; Namer, B.; Gross, F.; Klitsch, A.; Malzacher, T.; Kampik, D.; Malik, R.A.; et al. Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: A deep phenotyping study. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2021, 14, 17562864211004318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tavakoli, M.; Marshall, A.; Banka, S.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Fadavi, H.; Kingston, H.; Malik, R.A. Corneal confocal microscopy detects small-fiber neuropathy in Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease type 1A patients. Muscle Nerve 2012, 46, 698–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Perini, I.; Tavakoli, M.; Marshall, A.; Minde, J.; Morrison, I. Rare human nerve growth factor-beta mutation reveals relationship between C-afferent density and acute pain evaluation. J. Neurophysiol. 2016, 116, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Pagovich, O.E.; Vo, M.L.; Zhao, Z.Z.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Yuan, M.; Lertsuwanroj, B.; Ciralsky, J.; Lai, E.; Kiss, S.; D’Amico, D.J.; et al. Corneal confocal microscopy: Neurologic disease biomarker in Friedreich ataxia. Ann. Neurol. 2018, 84, 893–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Barnett, C.; Alon, T.; Abraham, A.; Kim, R.H.; McGuaig, P.; Kongkham, P.; Maurice, C.; Suppiah, S.; Zadeh, G.; Bril, V.; et al. Evidence of small-fiber neuropathy in neurofibromatosis type 1. Muscle Nerve 2019, 60, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Plante-Bordeneuve, V. Transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy: An update. J. Neurol. 2018, 265, 976–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rousseau, A.; Cauquil, C.; Dupas, B.; Labbé, A.; Baudouin, C.; Barreau, E.; Théaudin, M.; Lacroix, C.; Guiochon-Mantel, A.; Benmalek, A.; et al. Potential role of in vivo confocal microscopy for imaging corneal nerves in transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016, 134, 983–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, X.; Fan, D. Corneal sub-basal whorl-like nerve plexus: A landmark for early and follow-up evaluation in transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy. Eur. J. Neurol. 2021, 28, 630–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Politei, J.M.; Durand, C.; Schenone, A.B. Small fiber neuropathy in Fabry disease: A review of pathophysiology and treatment. J. Inborn Errors Metab. 2016, 4, 2326409816661351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Tavakoli, M.; Marshall, A.; Thompson, L.; Kenny, M.; Waldek, S.; Efron, N.; Malik, R.A. Corneal confocal microscopy: A novel noninvasive means to diagnose neuropathy in patients with Fabry disease. Muscle Nerve 2009, 40, 976–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bitirgen, G.; Turkmen, K.; Malik, R.A.; Ozkagnici, A.; Zengin, N. Corneal confocal microscopy detects corneal nerve damage and increased dendritic cells in Fabry disease. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sharma, S.; Tobin, V.; Vas, P.R.J.; Rayman, G. The LDIFLARE and CCM methods demonstrate early nerve fibre abnormalities in untreated hypothyroidism: A prospective study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 3094–3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Ramírez, M.; Martínez-Martínez, L.A.; Hernández-Quintela, E.; Velazco-Casapía, J.; Vargas, A.; Martínez-Lavín, M. Small fiber neuropathy in women with fibromyalgia. An in vivo assessment using corneal confocal bio-microscopy. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2015, 45, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Oudejans, L.; He, X.; Niesters, M.; Dahan, A.; Brines, M.; van Velzen, M. Cornea nerve fiber quantification and construction of phenotypes in patients with fibromyalgia. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Turan, K.E.; Kocabeyoglu, S.; Unal-Cevik, I.; Bezci, F.; Akinci, A.; Irkec, M. Ocular surface alterations in the context of corneal in vivo confocal microscopic characteristics in patients with fibromyalgia. Cornea 2018, 37, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Evdokimov, D.; Frank, J.; Klitsch, A.; Unterecker, S.; Warrings, B.; Serra, J.; Papagianni, A.; Saffer, N.; Altenschildesche, C.M.Z.; Kampik, D.; et al. Reduction of skin innervation is associated with a severe fibromyalgia phenotype. Ann. Neurol. 2019, 86, 504–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Anjos, R.; Vieira, L.; Sousa, A.; Maduro, V.; Alves, N.; Candelaria, P. Peripheral neuropathy in Parkinson disease: An in vivo confocal microscopy study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kass-Iliyya, L.; Javed, S.; Gosal, D.; Kobylecki, C.; Marshall, A.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Ponirakis, G.; Tavakoli, M.; Chaudhuri, K.R.; Jerizorska, M.; et al. Small fiber neuropathy in Parkinson’s disease: A clinical, pathological and corneal confocal microscopy study. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2015, 21, 1454–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Podgorny, P.J.; Suchowersky, O.; Romanchuk, K.G.; Feasby, T.E. Evidence for small fiber neuropathy in early Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2016, 28, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Misra, S.L.; Kersten, H.M.; Roxburgh, R.H.; Danesh-Meyer, H.V.; McGhee, C.N. Corneal nerve microstructure in Parkinson’s disease. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2017, 39, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Arrigo, A.; Rania, L.; Calamuneri, A.; Postorino, E.I.; Mormina, E.; Gaeta, M.; Marino, S.; DiLorenzo, G.; Quartarone, A.; Anastasi, G.; et al. Early corneal innervation and trigeminal alterations in Parkinson disease: A pilot study. Cornea 2018, 37, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Avetisov, S.E.; Karabanov, A.V.; Surnina, Z.V.; Gamidov, A.A. Changes in corneal nerves fibers in the early stages of Parkinson’s disease according to in vivo confocal microscopy. Vestn. Oftalmol. 2020, 136, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lim, S.H.; Ferdousi, M.; Kalteniece, A.; Kass-Iliyya, L.; Peetropoulos, I.N.; Malik, R.A.; Kobylecki, C.; Silverdale, M. Corneal confocal microscopy detects small fibre neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease using automated analysis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Che, N.N.; Ding, G.X.; Chen, S.Y.; Li, D.S.; Ma, J.J.; Yang, H.Q. Measurement of corneal nerve fiber parameters in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2021, 101, 498–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Lim, S.H.; Ferdousi, M.; Kalteniece, A.; Mahfoud, Z.R.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Malik, R.A.; Kobylecki, C.; Silverdale, M. Corneal confocal microscopy identifies Parkinson’s disease with more rapid motor progression. Mov. Disord. 2021, 36, 1927–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Mikolajczak, J.; Zimmermann, H.; Kheirkhah, A.; Kadas, E.M.; Oberwahrenbrock, T.; Muller, R.; Ren, A.; Kuchling, J.; Dietze, H.; Prüss, H.; et al. Patients with multiple sclerosis demonstrate reduced subbasal corneal nerve fibre density. Mult. Scler. 2017, 23, 1847–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bitirgen, G.; Akpinar, Z.; Malik, R.A.; Ozkagnici, A. Use of corneal confocal microscopy to detect corneal nerve loss and increased dendritic cells in patients with multiple sclerosis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017, 135, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Petropoulos, I.N.; Kamran, S.; Li, Y.; Khan, A.; Ponirakis, G.; Akhtar, N.; Deleu, D.; Shuaib, A.; Malik, R.A. Corneal confocal microscopy: An imaging endpoint for axonal degeneration in multiple sclerosis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017, 58, 3677–3681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ferrari, G.; Grisan, E.; Scarpa, F.; Fazio, R.; Comola, M.; Quattrini, A.; Comi, G.; Rama, P.; Riva, N. Corneal confocal microscopy reveals trigeminal small sensory fiber neuropathy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2014, 6, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Fu, J.; He, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, H.; Li, J.; Chen, L.; Fan, D. Small fiber neuropathy for assessment of disease severity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Corneal confocal microscopy findings. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2022, 17, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gad, H.; Khan, A.; Akhtar, N.; Kamran, S.; El-Sotouhy, A.; Dargham, S.R.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Ponirakis, G.; Shuaib, A.; Streletz, L.J.; et al. Corneal nerve and endothelial cell damage in patients with transient ischemic attack and minor ischemic stroke. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Khan, A.; Kamran, S.; Akhtar, N.; Ponirakis, G.; Al-Muhannadi, H.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Al-Fahdawi, S.; Qahwaji, R.; Dartaj, F.; Babu, B.; et al. Corneal confocal microscopy detects a reduction in corneal endothelial cells and nerve fibres in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Khan, A.; Akhtar, N.; Kamran, S.; Almuhannadi, H.; Ponirakis, G.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Babu, B.; Jose, N.R.; Ibrahim, R.G.; Gad, H.; et al. Corneal confocal microscopy identifies greater corneal nerve damage in patients with a recurrent compared to first ischemic stroke. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Kamran, S.; Khan, A.; Salam, A.; Akhtar, N.; Petropoulos, I.; Ponirakis, G.; Babu, B.; George, P.; Shuaib, A.; Malik, R.A. Cornea: A window to white matter changes in stroke; corneal confocal microscopy a surrogate marker for the presence and severity of white matter hyperintensities in ischemic stroke. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2020, 29, 104543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Ponirakis, G.; Al Hamad, H.; Sankaranarayanan, A.; Khan, A.; Chandran, M.; Ramadan, M.; Tosino, R.; Gawhale, P.V.; Alobaidi, M.; AlSulaiti, E.; et al. Association of corneal nerve fiber measures with cognitive function in dementia. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2019, 6, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Al-Janahi, E.; Ponirakis, G.; Al Hamad, H.; Vattoth, S.; Elsotouhy, A.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Khan, A.; Gad, H.; Chandran, M.; Sankaranarayanan, A.; et al. Corneal nerve and brain imaging in mild cognitive impairment and dementia. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2020, 77, 1533–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ponirakis, G.; Elsotouhy, A.; Al Hamad, H.; Vattoth, S.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Khan, A.; Gad, H.; Al-Khayat, F.; Chandran, M.; Ramadan, M.; et al. Association of cerebral ischemia with corneal nerve loss and brain atrophy in MCI and dementia. Front. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 690896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kinard, K.I.; Smith, A.G.; Singleton, J.R.; Lessard, M.K.; Katz, B.J.; Warner, J.E.A.; Crum, A.V.; Mifflin, M.D.; Brennan, K.C.; Digre, K.B.; et al. Chronic migraine is associated with reduced corneal nerve fiber density and symptoms of dry eye. Headache 2015, 55, 543–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Shetty, R.; Deshmukh, R.; Shroff, R.; Dedhiya, C.; Jayadev, C. Subbasal nerve plexus changes in chronic migraine. Cornea 2018, 37, 72–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lee, J.I.; Böcking, T.; Holle-Lee, D.; Malik, R.A.; Kieseier, B.C.; Hartung, H.P.; Guthoff, R.; Kleinschnitz, C.; Stettner, M. Corneal confocal microscopy demonstrates corneal nerve loss in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. O’Neill, F.; Marshall, A.; Ferdousi, M.; Malik, R.A. Corneal confocal microscopy detects small-fiber neuropathy in burning mouth syndrome: A cross-sectional study. J. Oral Facial Pain Headache 2019, 33, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mehra, S.; Tavakoli, M.; Kallinikos, P.A.; Efron, N.; Boulton, A.J.M.; Augustine, T.; Malik, R.A. Corneal confocal microscopy detects early nerve regeneration after pancreas transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007, 30, 2608–2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Tavakoli, M.; Kallinikos, P.; Iqbal, A.; Herbert, A.; Fadavi, H.; Efron, N.; Boulton, A.J.M.; Malik, R.A. Corneal confocal microscopy detects improvement in corneal nerve morphology with an improvement in risk factors for diabetic neuropathy. Diabet. Med. 2011, 28, 1261–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Azmi, S.; Ferdousi, M.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Ponirakis, G.; Fadavi, H.; Tavakoli, M.; Alam, U.; Jones, W.; Marshall, A.; Jeziorska, M.; et al. Corneal confocal microscopy shown an improvement in small-fibre neuropathy in subjects with type 1 diabetes on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion compared to multiple daily injection. Diabetes Care 2015, 38, e3–e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Adam, S.; Azmi, S.; Ho, J.H.; Liu, Y.; Ferdousi, M.; Siahmannsur, T.; Kalteniece, A.; Marshall, A.; Dhage, S.S.; Iqbal, Z.; et al. Improvements in diabetic neuropathy and nephropathy after bariatric surgery: A prospective cohort study. Obes. Surg. 2021, 31, 554–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Azmi, S.; Ferdousi, M.; Liu, Y.; Adam, S.; Iqbal, Z.; Dhage, S.; Ponirakis, G.; Siahmansur, T.; Marshall, A.; Petropoulos, I.; et al. Bariatric surgery leads to an improvement in small nerve fibre damage in subjects with obesity. Int. J. Obes. 2021, 45, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Dahan, A.; Dunne, A.; Swartjes, M.; Proto, P.; Heij, L.; Vogels, O.; van Velzen, M.; Sarton, E.; Niesters, M.; Tannemaat, M.R.; et al. ARA 290 improves symptoms in patients with sarcoidosis-associated small nerve fiber loss and increases corneal nerve fiber density. Mol. Med. 2013, 19, 334–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Culver, D.A.; Dahan, A.; Bajorunas, D.; Jerizorska, M.; van Velzen, M.; Aarts, L.P.H.; Tavee, J.; Tannemaat, M.R.; Dunne, A.N.; Kirk, R.I.; et al. Cibinetide improves corneal nerve fiber abundance in patients with sarcoidosis-associated small nerve fiber loss and neuropathic pain. Investig. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 2017, 58, BIO52–BIO60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Brines, M.; Dunne, A.N.; van Velzen, M.; Proto, P.L.; Ostenson, C.G.; Kirk, R.I.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Javed, S.; Malik, R.A.; Cerami, A.; et al. ARA 290, a nonerythropoietic peptide engineered from erythropoietin, improves metabolic control and neuropathic symptoms in patients with type 2 diabetes. Mol. Med. 2015, 20, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Lewis, E.J.; Perkins, B.A.; Lovblom, L.E.; Bazinet, R.P.; Wolever, T.M.; Bril, V. Effect of omega-3 supplementation on neuropathy in type 1 diabetes: A 12-month pilot trial. Neurology 2017, 88, 2294–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Britten-Jones, A.C.; Kamel, J.T.; Roberts, L.J.; Braat, S.; Craig, J.P.; Maclsaac, R.J.; Downie, L.E. Investigating the neuroprotective effect of oral omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in type 1 diabetes (nPROOFS1): A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes 2021, 70, 1794–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ponirakis, G.; Abdul-Ghani, M.A.; Jayyousi, A.; Almuhannadi, H.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Khan, A.; Gad, H.; Megahed, A.; DeFronzo, R.; Mahfoud, Z.; et al. Effect of treatment with exenatide and pioglitazone or basal-bolus insulin on diabetic neuropathy: A substudy of the Qatar Study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2020, 8, e001420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Pritchard, N.; Edwards, K.; Efron, N. Non-contact laser-scanning confocal microscopy of the cornea in vivo. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye 2014, 37, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Edwards, K.; Pritchard, N.; Gosschalk, K.; Sampson, G.P.; Russell, A.; Malik, R.A.; Efron, N. Wide-field assessment of the human corneal subbasal nerve plexus in diabetic neuropathy using a novel mapping technique. Cornea 2012, 31, 1078–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Kheirkhah, A.; Muller, R.; Mikolajczak, J.; Ren, A.; Kadas, E.M.; Zimmermann, H.; Pruess, H.; Paul, F.; Brandt, A.U.; Hamrah, P. Comparison of standard versus wide-field composite images of the corneal subbasal layer by in vivo confocal microscopy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 5801–5807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Allgeier, S.; Maier, S.; Mikut, R.; Peschel, S.; Reichert, K.M.; Stachs, O.; Köhler, B. Mosaicking the subbasal nerve plexus by guided eye movements. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 6082–6089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Petropoulos, I.N.; Ferdousi, M.; Marshall, A.; Alam, U.; Ponirakis, G.; Azmi, S.; Fadavi, H.; Efron, N.; Tavakoli, M.; Malik, R.A. The inferior whorl for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy using corneal confocal microscopy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Kalteniece, A.; Ferdousi, M.; Petropoulos, I.; Azmi, S.; Adam, S.; Fadavi, H.; Marshall, A.; Boulton, A.J.M.; Efron, N.; Faber, C.G.; et al. Greater corneal nerve loss at the inferior whorl is related to the presence of diabetic neuropathy and painful diabetic neuropathy. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Petropoulos, I.N.; Al-Mohammedi, A.; Chen, X.; Ferdousi, M.; Ponirakis, G.; Kemp, H.; Chopra, R.; Hau, S.; Schargus, M.; Vollert, J.; et al. The utility of corneal nerve fractal dimension analysis in peripheral neuropathies of different etiology. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2020, 9, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Petropoulos, I.N.; Alam, U.; Fadavi, H.; Marshall, A.; Asghar, O.; Dabbah, M.A.; Chen, X.; Graham, J.; Ponirakis, G.; Boulton, A.J.M.; et al. Rapid automated diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with in vivo corneal confocal microscopy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 2071–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Dehghani, C.; Pritchard, N.; Edwards, K.; Russell, A.W.; Malik, R.A.; Efron, N. Fully automated, semiautomated, and manual morphometric analysis of corneal subbasal nerve plexus in individuals with and without diabetes. Cornea 2014, 33, 696–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Williams, B.M.; Borroni, D.; Liu, R.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lim, J.; Ma, B.; Romano, V.; Qi, H.; Ferdousi, M.; et al. An artificial intelligence-based deep learning algorithm for the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy using corneal confocal microscopy: A development and validation study. Diabetologia 2020, 63, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Salahouddin, T.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Ferdousi, M.; Ponirakis, G.; Asghar, O.; Alam, U.; Kamran, S.; Mahfoud, Z.R.; Efron, N.; Malik, R.A.; et al. Artificial intelligence-based classification of diabetic peripheral neuropathy from corneal confocal microscopy images. Diabetes Care 2021, 44, e151–e153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Malik, R.A.; Efron, N. Corneal Confocal Microscopy and the Nervous System: Introduction to the Special Issue. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061475

AMA Style

Malik RA, Efron N. Corneal Confocal Microscopy and the Nervous System: Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(6):1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061475

Chicago/Turabian Style

Malik, Rayaz A., and Nathan Efron. 2022. "Corneal Confocal Microscopy and the Nervous System: Introduction to the Special Issue" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 6: 1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061475

APA Style

Malik, R. A., & Efron, N. (2022). Corneal Confocal Microscopy and the Nervous System: Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(6), 1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061475

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop