Outcome of Monochorionic Pregnancies after Selective Feticide with Bipolar Cord Coagulation: A German Single Center Experience
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Material and Methods
- Severe discordant anomaly (DA): when the anomaly was a threat to the entire pregnancy (e.g., severe polyhydramnios) or parental decision for feticide of the abnormal fetus.
- sIUGR: If worsening of the Doppler measurements was observed with absent or reverse end-diastolic flow (AEDF or REDF) in either the UA or the DV prior to viability.
- Severe TTTS when laser therapy seemed not feasible: either the acceptor was suffering cardiac failure with abnormal flow in the DV, atrioventricular regurgitation, brain damage or hydrops fetalis, or the donor was presented with the reversed end-diastolic flow in the UA.
- TRAP: any case of TRAP as the risk of the fetal demise of the pump twin is high even in the absence of ultrasound finding, suggestive for high cardiac output failure
- TAPS: severe, early TAPS, inaccessible by fetoscopy, or laser therapy.
3. Results
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lewi, L.; Gucciardo, L.; Van Mieghem, T.; De Koninck, P.; Beck, V.; Medek, H.; Van Schoubroeck, D.; Devlieger, R.; De Catte, L.; Deprest, J. Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies: Natural History and Risk Stratification. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2010, 27, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shinar, S.; Xing, W.; Pruthi, V.; Jianping, C.; Slaghekke, F.; Groene, S.; Lopriore, E.; Lewi, L.; Couck, I.; Yinon, Y.; et al. Outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy complicated by Type-III selective intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 57, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mackie, F.L.; Rigby, A.; Morris, R.K.; Kilby, M. Prognosis of the co-twin following spontaneous single intrauterine fetal death in twin pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018, 126, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hillman, S.; Morris, K.; Kilby, M.D. Co-Twin Prognosis After Single Fetal Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 118, 928–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nicolini, U.; Poblete, A. Single intrauterine death in monochorionic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 1999, 14, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deprest, J.A.; Audibert, F.; Van Schoubroeck, D.; Hecher, K.; Mahieu-Caputo, D. Bipolar coagulation of the umbilical cord in complicated monochorionic twin pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000, 182, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallot, D.; Laurichesse, H.; Lemery, D. Selective feticide in monochorionic twin pregnancies by ultrasound-guided umbilical cord occlusion: Cord occlusion in twins. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 22, 484–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nicolini, U.; Poblete, A.; Boschetto, C.; Bonati, F.; Roberts, A. Complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: Experience with bipolar cord coagulation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001, 185, 703–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, H.; Wagner, A.J.; Sy, E.; Ball, R.; Feldstein, V.A.; Goldstein, R.B.; Farmer, D. Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for twin-reversed arterial perfusion sequence. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007, 196, 459.e1–459.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hecher, K.; Hackelöer, B.J.; Ville, Y. Umbilical cord coagulation by operative microendoscopy at 16 weeks’ gestation in an acardiac twin. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 1997, 10, 130–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shinar, S.; Agrawal, S.; El-Chaâr, D.; Abbasi, N.; Beecroft, R.; Kachura, J.; Keunen, J.; Seaward, G.; Van Mieghem, T.; Windrim, R.; et al. Selective fetal reduction in complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: A comparison of techniques. Prenat. Diagn. 2021, 41, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, N.; Sun, J.; Wang, J.; Jian, W.; Lu, J.; Miao, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, F.; Chen, D.; Ye, X.; et al. Selective termination of the fetus in multiple pregnancies using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weber, E.C.; Recker, F.; Gottschalk, I.; Strizek, B.; Geipel, A.; Gembruch, U.; Berg, C. Outcome of TRAP Sequence Treated in the First Trimester—A Ten-Year Single-Center Experience. Ultraschall Med. 2021; online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Greimel, P.; Csapo, B.; Haeusler, M.; Lang, U.; Klaritsch, P. A Modified Technique for Cord Transection in Monochorionic Monoamniotic Twin Pregnancies. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2018, 44, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weber, E.C.; Recker, F.; Gottschalk, I.; Strizek, B.; Geipel, A.; Gembruch, U.; Berg, C. Outcome of Monochorionic Monoamniotic Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion Sequence Diagnosed in the First Trimester. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2021, 48, 778–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Evans, M.I.; Goldberg, J.D.; Horenstein, J.; Wapner, R.J.; Ayoub, M.A.; Stone, J.; Lipitz, S.; Achiron, R.; Holzgreve, W.; Brambati, B.; et al. Selective termination for structural, chromosomal, and mendelian anomalies: International experience. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999, 181, 893–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewi, L.; Gratacos, E.; Ortibus, E.; Van Schoubroeck, D.; Carreras, E.; Higueras, T.; Perapoch, J.; Deprest, J. Pregnancy and infant outcome of 80 consecutive cord coagulations in complicated monochorionic multiple pregnancies. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006, 194, 782–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossi, A.C.; D’Addario, V. Umbilical cord occlusion for selective feticide in complicated monochorionic twins: A systematic review of literature. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009, 200, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hecher, K.; Lewi, L.; Gratacos, E.; Huber, A.; Ville, Y.; Deprest, J. Twin reversed arterial perfusion: Fetoscopic laser coagulation of placental anastomoses or the umbilical cord. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2006, 28, 688–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bos, E.M.V.D.; Van Klink, J.M.M.; Middeldorp, J.M.; Klumper, F.J.; Oepkes, D.; Lopriore, E. Perinatal outcome after selective feticide in monochorionic twin pregnancies: Perinatal outcome after selective feticide. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 41, 653–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Indication | All (n) | DA Twins (n) | MA Twins (n) | DC TA Triplets (n) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Discordant anomaly | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 |
Selective IUGR | 29 | 26 | 0 | 3 |
Type I | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Type II | 16 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
Type III | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
TTTS | 13 | 11 | 2 | 1 |
TTTS II° | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
TTTS III° | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
TTTS IV° | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
Recipients | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 |
Donors | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
TRAP sequence | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
TAPS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Characteristic | All n = 56 | Discordant Anomaly n = 10 | sIUGR n = 29 | TTTS n = 13 | TRAP Sequence n = 3 | TAPS n = 1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA at presentation (weeks) | 20.2 (17.5–22.3) | 21.6 (16.7–25.3) | 20.1 (17.3–22.4) | 19.5 (18.9–21.7) | 18.5 (14.1–n.a.) | 21.5 |
GA at intervention (weeks) | 21.2 (19.5–23.1) | 21.9 (19.1–29.4) | 21.6 (20.6–23.3) | 20.0 (19.2–22.7) | 19.0 (16.1–n.a.) | 21.5 |
IUD (weeks) | 21.1 (20.1–21.7) | - | 21.6 (21.1–21.6) | 19.6 | 20.9 (20.5–n.a.) | - |
Intervention until IUD (weeks) | 1.4 (0.0–4.4) | - | 1.8 (0.0–n.a.) | 1.4 | 2.6 (0.0–n.a.) | - |
PPROM (weeks) | 32.5 (25.6–35.5) | 36.2 | 32.0 (29.1–33.9) | 30.0 (23.7–35.9) | - | - |
23–34 weeks (n) | 7 | 0 | 5 | 2 | ||
34–36 weeks (n) | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
Intervention until PPROM (weeks) | 10.0 (3.5–15.3) | 16.6 | 9.6 (6.6–10.4) | 9.4 (2.8–16.1) | - | - |
GA at delivery (weeks) | 37.1 (32.0–38.3) | 36.1 (32.6–37.6) | 37.6 (31.1–38.5) | 36.3 (34.6–38.0) | 39.0 | 38.6 |
Intervention until delivery (weeks) | 14.1 (7.6–17.4) | 7.5 (4.3–17.5) | 13.0 (8.5–17.6) | 15.4 (12.3–17.1) | 20.0 | 17.1 |
PTD (n {%}) | 25 (44.6%) | 6 (60.0%) | 12 (41.4%) | 7 (53.8%) | - | - |
≤28 weeks (n {%}) | 6 (10.7%) | 1 (10.0%) | 4 (13.8%) | 1 (7.7%) | ||
28–31.6 weeks (n {%}) | 6 (10.7%) | 1 (10.0%) | 4 (13.8%) | 1 (7.7%) | ||
32–36 weeks (n {%}) | 13 (23.2%) | 4 (40.0%) | 4 (13.8%) | 5 (38.5%) | ||
Birth weight (g) | 2500 (1840–3000) | 2525 (1792–2940) | 2500 (1450–3280) | 2400 (1841–2633) | 2402 | 2550 |
IUD | 5 (8.9%) | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
NND | 2 (3.6%) | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PPROM | 11 (19.6%) | 1 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Perinatal Survival | 49 (87.5%) | 10 (100%) | 25 (86.2%) | 12 (92.3%) | 1 (33.3%) | 1 (100%) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Weber, E.C.; Strizek, B.; Recker, F.; Geipel, A.; Gembruch, U.; Berg, C.; Gottschalk, I. Outcome of Monochorionic Pregnancies after Selective Feticide with Bipolar Cord Coagulation: A German Single Center Experience. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1516. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061516
Weber EC, Strizek B, Recker F, Geipel A, Gembruch U, Berg C, Gottschalk I. Outcome of Monochorionic Pregnancies after Selective Feticide with Bipolar Cord Coagulation: A German Single Center Experience. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(6):1516. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061516
Chicago/Turabian StyleWeber, Eva Christin, Brigitte Strizek, Florian Recker, Annegret Geipel, Ulrich Gembruch, Christoph Berg, and Ingo Gottschalk. 2022. "Outcome of Monochorionic Pregnancies after Selective Feticide with Bipolar Cord Coagulation: A German Single Center Experience" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 6: 1516. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061516
APA StyleWeber, E. C., Strizek, B., Recker, F., Geipel, A., Gembruch, U., Berg, C., & Gottschalk, I. (2022). Outcome of Monochorionic Pregnancies after Selective Feticide with Bipolar Cord Coagulation: A German Single Center Experience. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(6), 1516. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061516