Next Article in Journal
Prognostic Significance of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Left Atrial and Biventricular Strain Analysis during the Follow-Up of Suspected Myocarditis
Previous Article in Journal
What Is New in the Management of High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Is the Anterolateral or Posterolateral Approach More Effective for Early Postoperative Recovery after Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/jcm12020456
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Proximal Femur Fractures in the Elderly—A Novel Modality to Predict Mortality: The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio

by
Omer Marom
*,†,
Inbar Paz
†,
David Segal
,
Guy Topaz
,
Nitzan Abelson
,
Alex Tavdi
,
Refael Behrbalk
,
Ezequiel Palmanovich
,
Nissim Ohana
‡ and
Eyal Yaacobi
‡
Orthopedic Department, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 4428164, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
‡
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(2), 456; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020456
Submission received: 24 November 2022 / Revised: 28 December 2022 / Accepted: 3 January 2023 / Published: 6 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Research in Skeletal Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: The assessment and identification of elderly patients with proximal femur fractures (PFF) who are at high risk of postoperative mortality may influence the treatment decision-making process. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could be used to predict postoperative mortality in the elderly population. Methods: A four-year retrospective cohort study of electronic medical records was conducted at a single tertiary care hospital between 2015 and 2018. Data from 1551 patients aged 65 years and older who underwent surgical treatment for PFF were collected and analyzed. The data included complete blood counts at admission, demographic information, underlying illnesses, type of surgery, and postoperative mortality and complications during the first year of follow-up. A survival analysis model was utilized. Results: The mean age was 90.76 ± 1.88 years, 1066 (68.7%) women. Forty-four (2.8%) patients experienced postoperative infection. A higher NLR0 was independently associated with higher all-cause mortality rates in patients who underwent surgical treatment for PFF (p = 0.041). Moreover, the mean NLR0 value was higher when the death occurred earlier after surgery (p < 0.001). Conclusions: When combined with other clinical and laboratory findings, NLR0 levels may serve as a potentially valuable, inexpensive, and reliable prognostic biomarker to improve risk stratification for elderly patients who are candidates for PFF surgery. Furthermore, with additional research, we could potentially develop a treatment algorithm to identify patients at high risk of postoperative mortality.

1. Introduction

Proximal femur fractures (PFF) are a major healthcare and financial challenge, resulting in significant morbidity, mortality, and decreased functional ability [1,2,3,4]. As the population ages, the annual number of PFF increases [3,4,5,6]. Patients with PFF have a higher risk of mortality compared to the general population at their age. Mortality rates are estimated to be 10% one month after the fracture and 20–30% a year after the fracture [7,8,9,10,11]. Currently, surgical treatment of PFF is common practice, preferably within the first 48 h of injury. Assessing mortality, morbidity, and postoperative complications in patients with PFF is a complex task as the affected population is predominantly elderly and frail, with multiple comorbidities and a low level of preoperative physical activity [12]. Due to the severe pain and disability associated with an untreated PFF, a low threshold for surgical treatment may be required. Early risk stratification helps identify PFF patients who may benefit from a non-surgical approach or a less invasive type of surgery combined with pain management and immobilization. The use of clinical scoring systems, such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ (ASA) physical status classification system and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) as prognostic factors, has shown efficacy in distinguishing between high-risk and low-risk patients [13,14]. To identify high-risk PFF patients, clinical, radiologic, and laboratory evaluations should be performed.
PFF and the subsequent surgical treatment may trigger an inflammatory response and induce changes in white blood cell levels, resulting in an increased neutrophil count and decreased lymphocyte count [15,16]. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is calculated by dividing the absolute number of neutrophils circulating in the blood by the absolute number of lymphocytes circulating in the blood, making NLR routinely available from complete blood counts. Over the past decade, NLR has been extensively studied as a rapid, widely available, and inexpensive biomarker of the systemic inflammatory response. Elevated NLR levels were found to be a significant predictor of adverse outcomes and mortality in patients with a wide range of orthopedic conditions [17,18] as well as non-orthopedic conditions such as cardiovascular [19,20,21,22,23,24], renal [25,26], COPD [27], inflammatory [28,29], oncologic [30,31,32,33], and various postoperative conditions [34]. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that NLR is a marker of frailty or poor health and that it could be used for better risk stratification in the fields of orthopedic surgery as well as internal medicine.
In our effort to further investigate the role of NLR as a prognostic factor in patients with PFF, we hypothesized that NLR at hospital admission (NLR0) can serve as a reliable predictor of postoperative adverse outcomes in patients with PFF undergoing surgical treatment. We specifically investigated the relationship between an elevated level of NLR0 and mortality and infection rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Setting and Population

The study was conducted at a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. The Orthopedic Trauma Unit performs approximately 500 PFF surgeries annually. From 1 January 2015 through 31 December 2018, we collected and analyzed data from all patients aged 65 years and older who underwent bipolar cementless hemiarthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, and closed reduction internal fixation for intracapsular and extracapsular PFFs (AO/OTA 31). An orthopedic surgery specialist used a physical examination and radiographic studies to diagnose PFF. The type of surgery was chosen according to the type of fracture and the patient’s medical condition. Patients with the following characteristics were excluded from the analysis: pathological fractures, those under 65 years of age at admission, and those who had been treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or steroids within six months of admission.

2.2. Laboratory Measurements and Data Collection

We collected data from electronic medical records, including patients’ demographic information, underlying illnesses at the time of admission, type of surgery, and postoperative follow-up and complications. Mortality rates were obtained from the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. Data collection was approved by the Institutional Review Board.
On admission, venous peripheral blood samples were routinely collected at the Emergency Department (ED) for complete blood count, including neutrophil and lymphocyte counts. Blood samples were delivered to a central laboratory within one hour of venipuncture and analyzed using standardized, automated kits (Adiva 2120, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). During the one-year follow-up period, blood counts were retaken at routine clinic visits to the family physician. Since NLR was not a routinely derived marker, we calculated it for the purpose of this study.

2.3. Clinical Endpoints and Terms

Clinical endpoints included all-cause mortality and postoperative infection within the first year of surgery. Specialized orthopedic surgeons diagnosed the latter, taking into account blood test results, purulent wound discharges, positive wound cultures, abnormal swelling of the surgical site, local heat, erythema, and pain. Patients were divided into two groups. The first group included patients who did not die during the first postoperative year. The second group included patients who died during the first postoperative year. The second group was further divided into sub-groups based on when the patients passed away: within the first month, three months, six months, or twelve months of surgery. The mean NLR0 of Group 1 was compared to that of each of the sub-groups.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

We used descriptive statistics to present raw data. We used the student t test to compare continuous variables, and the Chi2 test to compare categorical variables. We used the Pearson’s correlation coefficient to evaluate correlations between two continuous variables. A Cox regression multivariable survival model was then constructed: the first year all-cause mortality was set as the dependent variable. Variables which have been found to have a statistically significant association with the dependent variable were introduced as the covariables. The hazard ratios for each variable were reported, along with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the p values. We performed a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to detect the best cut-off to predict the first-year mortality (as the categorical variable) with the NLR0 (as the continuous variable). Then we used this cut-off to categorize the patient population into two groups according to their NLR0. Following this categorization we constructed and analyzed Kaplan-Meier plot where the two groups were compared for survival. We regarded a beta of 0.05 and an alpha of 0.8 as statistically significant. The data was collected and analyzed with an SPSS V28.0 software (Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Inclusion and Exclusion

During the study period, 1725 patients underwent surgical treatment for PFF at our medical center. Following an exclusion process a total of 1551 (89.9%) patients with PFF were included in the analysis (Figure 1).

3.2. Patient Baseline Characteristics

The mean baseline NLR0 of the cohort was 8.51 ± 6.52. The mean age was 90.76 ± 1.88 years and was not found to have a statistically significant correlation with the NLR0 level (r = 0.005, p = 0.83). Female patients made up the majority of the cohort (915, 69.3%), and their mean NLR0 level was lower than that of male patients (7.92 ± 5.52 vs. 9.83 ± 8.17 respectively, p < 0.001, Table 1). The mean NLR0 was also found to be statistically significantly lower in patients with CHF (p = 0.014) and COPD (p = 0.023, Table 1).

3.3. Surgical Procedures

There was little evidence of association between surgical procedures and the one- year mortality rate (p = 0.058), nor with the one-, three-, and six-month mortality rates (p = 0.314, p = 0.148, and p = 0.071, respectively), although patients who underwent a THA had a comparably lower mortality rate (Table 2). There was no significant difference in NLR0 between patients who have been operated by residents or senior surgeons (p = 0.144). In addition, there was no significant correlation between NLR0 and the duration of surgery (r = 0.045, p = 0.079) or the duration of hospital stay (r = −0.021, p = 0.414). The associations between the NLR0 and various comorbidities is presented in Table 1.

3.4. NLR0 Postoperative Mortality and Infection

The overall mortality rate one year after surgery was 17.6% (273 patients). Patients who died during the first post-operative year had a higher mean NLR0 in all of the study’s four timepoints (1, 3, 6, and 12 months, p < 0.001, Figure 2). The mean NLR0 value was higher when the death occurred early after surgery (p = 0.009, Figure 2). Forty-three (2.8%) patients suffered from postoperative infection, but this complication had no association with the first-year mortality rate (p = 0.495, Table 2).
The multivariable Cox regression analysis included variables that have been found to be associated with a higher NLR0 in the preliminary univariable analysis (Table 2): sex, CRF, IHD, AF/PAF, colon cancer, smoking history, WBC, Hemoglobin, platelet count, MCV, RDW, Urea, Creatinine, and Albumin. The HR (hazard ratio) for NLR0 was found to be 1.024 (95% confidence interval 1.001 to 1.047, p = 0.041 (Table 3). Additional factors (Table 3) that have been found to have a statistically significant HR were sex (female being protective, p = 0.014), higher RDW (p = 0.026), high urea (p < 0.001). and low albumin (p < 0.001).
A ROC curve revealed that a cut-off of seven would provide the optimal distinction between patients with comparatively low or high NLR0 when plotted against the first-year mortality (p < 0.001, AUC = 0.564). A Kaplan-Meier survival curve revealed a statistically significant difference between the survival distributions of the two groups (p < 0.001 for the Log Rank test of equality, Figure 3).

3.5. Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, due to the lack of laboratory data, NLR was only calculated on admission, with no assessment of possible changes during the postoperative period at the hospital. Second, due to the retrospective nature of this study, the Cox regression analysis was unable to account for all the differences between those who survived and those who died during the first post-operative year. Third, this study referred only to the patients treated surgically, with no comparison between patients treated operatively vs. non-operatively. Further studies comparing these two groups will help to understand the role of NLR0 in the treatment decision-making process. Additional factors that have been found in association with the first post-operative year mortality were male sex, high urea, and low albumin levels. These findings are of importance but investigating them was beyond the scope of this study. Further studies in this regard should be performed to better understand their role as prognostic factors in the studied population. Finally, the cut-off for elevated NLR in the majority of the studies mentioned above was 5.5, and 18 for severely elevated NLR. In our study, the mean NLR for all patients was relatively high, at 8.2, and the optimal cutoff was set at 7. This might be explained by the characteristics of our study population, which consisted of older female adults who have been found in this study to have a higher NLR0 values than men.

4. Discussion

The main finding of this study is that higher NLR0 was independently associated with a higher rate of all-cause mortality in patients who underwent surgery for PFF at one month, three months, six months, and twelve months postoperatively. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that the mean level of NLR0 was higher when the death occurred earlier after surgery. A higher NLR0 did not correlate with a higher rate of postoperative infection.
The data on the association between NLR0 and the systemic inflammatory response is spared compared to that on CRP, IL-6, or other similar markers. The inflammatory response to trauma is complex, and studies have demonstrated that a hypo-inflammatory response, particularly in the late stages of trauma, may contribute to poor outcomes, including infection. In studies with a small sample of PFF patients, NLR0 has been identified as a marker for poor short- and medium-term postoperative outcomes. Alexandru L et al. investigated the association between NLR0 and diaphyseal fractures of the humerus, femur, and tibia in 148 patients. They discovered that patients with femur fractures had significantly higher NLR0 and that NLR0 was associated with the duration of hospitalization [35]. Fisher A et al., investigated the relationship between NLR0 and the presence of fractures and comorbidities, as well as the prognostic value of NLR0 for short-term outcomes in 415 orthogeriatric patients. They identified NLR0 > 5 as an independent predictor of postoperative myocardial injury and NLR0 > 8.5 as a predictor of infection and in-hospital mortality [36]. In another study by Temiz A et al., an increased NLR0 was associated with higher one-year mortality in 50 female patients with PFF [37]. In a study by Ozbek et al. on patients who underwent proximal femur fracture fixation by intramedullary nails, NLR0 > 5.25 was significantly associated with a higher rate of mortality one-year postoperatively [38].
NLR plays a highly significant role in different postoperative manifestations in orthopedic and non-orthopedic surgeries that were not demonstrated in this specific study as presented in recent studies by Melinte R. et al. and Pasqui E. et al., respectively [39,40].
Complementary to this current study in which the presentation of NLR (Day 0) was investigated, several studies examined the importance of the NLR levels that were measured during the post-operative period as a prognostic factor in patients with PFF. In a study of 247 patients with PFF, Forget P et al. determined that the fifth postoperative day NLR5 could be a risk factor for postoperative mortality and cardiovascular complications [41]. In a study of 286 patients with PFF by Forget P et al., a score composed of age, gender, NLR5, and CRP protein on the fifth postoperative day (CRP5) was predictive of mortality one-year after surgery [42]. In a study of 132 patients with PFF, Atlas A et al. demonstrated that the rate of increase in NLR values in the postoperative period is a predictor of morbidity and mortality [43]. Wasko MK et al. measured NLR and CRP levels pre-and post-total knee or hip arthroplasty in 387 patients. NLR levels had returned to preoperative values by the fifth postoperative day, and NLR had a more rapid postoperative kinetic pattern when compared to CRP [44]. While the investigation of the post-operative NLR levels was beyond the scope of the current study, these articles further demonstrate the role of the NLR values as indicators of a possible inferior outcome in PFF surgery.
Previous studies describing the link between NLR and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with PFF used small sample sizes and focused primarily on short-term outcomes. Our study included a larger sample of patients with PFF (N = 1527) and assessed both short-and medium-term outcomes. In contrast to the current study which did not demonstrate a significant association between NLR and postoperative infection, Xu H. et al. showed that NLR levels have been associated with infection but were not as reliable as the CRP levels [45]. Altogether, the current study supports the existing cumulative body of literature stating that higher NLR0 values have been indicative of inferior surgical outcomes.
Several mechanisms could explain the association between elevated NLR0 and high mortality rates following PFF surgery. Increased NLR reflects a systemic inflammatory response in which the neutrophil count is high while the lymphocyte count is low. Ozturk et al. assessed the relationship between NLR0 levels and bone mineral density in a cross-sectional study of 1635 elderly individuals and identified NLR0 as an independent predictor of osteoporosis [46]. Recent evidence suggests that inflammation may play a critical role in bone remodeling and the pathogenesis of osteoporosis [47,48] and atherosclerosis [49], which may partially explain the relationship between NLR0 as a marker of systemic inflammation and increased postoperative mortality following PFF surgery.

5. Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that elderly patients undergoing surgery for PFF who have an elevated NLR level at the time of admission could be at higher risk of both short-and medium-term postoperative mortality. A specific scale of NLR values has yet to be developed. However, we believe that these preliminary results warrant a larger database study to evaluate this biomarker and potentially contribute to the development of an algorithm or tool to help distinguish between patients who may benefit from surgical treatment and those who will not. Along with other clinical and laboratory findings, NLR0 could be a valuable, simple, and inexpensive prognostic biomarker that aids in mortality calculations, risk stratification, and treatment selection for patients with PFF.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, original draft preparation, investigation, O.M. and I.P., data analysis, article preparation and critical revisions, D.S., resources, supervision G.T., software, formal analysis, N.A. and A.T., methodology, data curation, R.B. and E.P., project administration, supervision, review, and editing, N.O. and E.Y., validation, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Meir Medical Center. Approval No. MMC-0290-18.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy issues.

Acknowledgments

I would like to extend my deep appreciation and thanks to my colleges who helped with this study, in particularly Ohana and Yaacobi.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gullberg, B.; Johnell, O.; Kanis, J.A. World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 1997, 7, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Johnell, O.; Kanis, J.A. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2004, 15, 897–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Neto, J.S.H.; Dias, C.R.; Bula de Almedia, J.D. Epidemiological characteristics and causes of proximal femur fractures among the elderly. Rev. Bras. Ortop. 2011, 46, 660–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Joosse, P.; Loggers, S.A.; Van de Ree, C.L.P.M.; Van Balen, R.; Steens, J.; Zuurmond, R.G.; Gosens, T.; Van Helden, S.H.; Polinder, S.; Willems, H.C.; et al. FRAIL-HIP study group et al. The value of nonoperative versus operative treatment of frail institutionalized elderly patients with a proximal femur fracture in the shade of life (FRAIL–HIP); protocol for a multicenter observational cohort study. BMC Geriatr. 2019, 19, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Johnell, O.; Kanis, J.A. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosos Int. 2006, 17, 1726–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Silva, J.; Linhares, D.; Ferreira, M.; Amorim, N.; Neves, N.; Pinto, R. Epidemiological trends of proximal femur fracture in the elderly population in Portugal. Acta Med. Port. 2018, 31, 562–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sheehan, S.E.; Shyu, J.Y.; Weaver, M.J.; Sodickson, A.D.; Khurana, B. Proximal femur fractures: What the orthopedic surgeon wants to know. Radiographics 2015, 35, 1563–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zamora-Navas, P.; Esteban-Pena, M. Seasonality in incidence and mortality of hip fracture. Rev. Esp. Cir. Ortop. Trauma. 2019, 63, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abrahamsen, B.; van Staa, T.; Ariely, R.; Olson, M.; Cooper, C. Excess mortality following hip fracture: A systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int. 2009, 20, 1633–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Parker, M.; Johansen, A. Hip fracture. BMJ 2006, 333, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Piolo, G.; Giusti, A.; Barone, A. Orthogeriatric care for the elderly with hip fractures: Where are we? Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2008, 20, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dennison, E.; Mohamed, A.; Cooper, C. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Rheumatol. Dis. Clin. North America 2006, 32, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zehir, S.; Sipahioglu, S.; Ozdemir, G.; Sahin, E.; Yar, U.; Akgul, T. Red cell distribution and mortality in patients with hip fracture treated with partial prosthesis. Acta Orthop. Traumatil. Turc. 2014, 48, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yin, P.; Lv, H.; Zhang, L.; Long, A.; Tang, P. Combination of red cell distribution width and American Society of Anesthesiologists score for hip fracture mortality prediction. Osteoporos Int. 2016, 27, 2077–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mimasaka, S.; Funayama, M.; Hashiyada, M.; Nata, M.; Tsunenari, S. Significance of levels of IL-6 and IL-8 after trauma: A study of 11 cytokines postmortem using multiplex immunoassay. Injury 2007, 38, 1047–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Menger, M.; Vollmar, B. Surgical trauma: Hyperinflammation versus immunosuppression? Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2004, 389, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Burak, K.; Kadir, B.; Nazan, K.; Erkam, K.; Umut, H.G.; Ferdi, G.; Mehmet, C.A. Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio may be a predictive marker of poor prognosis in Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease. Hip Int. 2016, 26, 598–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sigmund, I.; Puchner, S.; Windhager, R. Serum Inflammatory Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wang, X.; Fan, X.; Ji, S.; Ma, A.; Wang, T. Prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in heart failure patients. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2018, 485, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Shao, Q.; Chen, K.; Rha, S.W.; Lim, H.E.; Li, G.; Lui, T. Usefulness of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis. Arch. Med. Res. 2015, 46, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tamhane, U.U.; Aneja, S.; Montgomery, D.; Rogers, E.K.; Eagle, K.A.; Gurm, H.S. Association between admission neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Am. J. Cardiol. 2008, 102, 653–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Balta, S.; Celik, T.; Mikhailidis, D.P.; Ozturk, C.; Demirkol, S.; Aparci, M.; Iyisoy, A. The relation between atherosclerosis and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2015, 22, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Bhat, T.M.; Afari, M.E.; Garcia, L.A. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in peripheral vascular disease: A review. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2016, 14, 871–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Niculescu, R.; Russu, E.; Arbanasi, E.M.; Kaller, R.; Arbanasi, E.M.; Melinte, R.M.; Cosarca, C.M.; Cocuz, I.G.; Sabau, A.H.; Tinca, A.C.; et al. Carotid Plaque Features and Inflammatory Biomarkers as Predictors of Restenosis and Mortality Following Carotid Endarterectomy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Woziwodzka, K.; Dziewierz, A.; Pawica, M.; Panek, A.; Krzanowski, M.; Golasa, P.; Latacz, P.; Burkat, M.; Kuzniewski, M.; Krzanowska, K. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts long-term all-cause mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5. Folia Med. Cracov. 2019, 59, 55–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Muresan, A.V.; Russu, E.; Arbanasi, E.M.; Kaller, R.; Hosu, I.; Arbanasi, E.M.; Voidazan, S.T. The Predictive Value of NLR, MLR, and PLR in the Outcome of End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Paliogiannis, P.; Fois, A.G.; Sotgia, S.; Mangoni, A.A.; Zinellu, E.; Pirina, P.; Negri, S.; Carru, C.; Zinellu, A. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and clinical outcomes in COPD: Recent evidence and future perspectives. Eur. Respir Rev. 2018, 27, 170113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Chandrashekara, S.; Ahmad, M.M.; Renuka, P.; Anupama, K.R.; Renuka, K. Characterization of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a measure of inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 20, 1457–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, D.S.; Shin, D.; Lee, M.S.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, D.Y.; Kim, S.M.; Lee, M.G. Assessment of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in Korean patients with psoriasis vulgaris and psoriatic arthritis. J Dermatol. 2016, 43, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guthrie, G.J.; Charles, K.A.; Roxburgh, C.S.; Horgan, P.G.; McMillan, D.C.; Clarke, S.J. The systemic inflammation-based neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio: Experience in patients with cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2013, 88, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Miyamoto, R.; Inagawa, S.; Sano, N.; Tadano, S.; Adachi, S.; Yamamoto, M. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicts short-term and long-term outcomes in gastric cancer patients. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2018, 44, 607–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, J.J.; Hu, Z.G.; Shi, W.X.; Deng, T.; He, S.Q.; Yuan, S.G. Prognostic significance of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 2807–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bojaxhui, B.; Templeton, A.; Elicin, O.; Shelan, M.; Zaugg, K.; Walser, M.; Giger, R.; Aebersold, D.M.; Pra, A.D. Relation of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to survival and toxicity in head and neck cancer patients treated with (chemo-) radiation. Radiat Oncol. 2018, 13, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vaughan-Shaw, P.; Rees, J.R.; King, A. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in outcome prediction after emergency abdominal surgery in the elderly. Int. J. Surg. 2012, 10, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Alexandru, L.; Haragus, H.; Deleanu, B.; Timar, B.; Poenaru, D.N.; Vlad, D.C. Hematology panel biomarkers for humeral, femur, and tibial diaphyseal fractures. Int. Orthop. 2019, 43, 1567–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fisher, A.; Srikusalanukul, W.; Fisher, L.; Smith, P. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio on admission and short-term outcomes in orthogeriatric patients. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2016, 13, 588–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Temiz, A.; Ersozlu, S. Admission neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and postoperative mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture. Ulus. Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2019, 25, 71–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ozbek, E.A.; Ayanoglu, T.; Olcar, H.A.; Yalvac, E.S. Is the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio a predictive value for postoperative mortality un orthogeriatric patients who underwent peoximal femur nail surgery for pertrochanteric fracture? Ulus. Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020, 26, 607–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Melinte, R.M.; Arbanasi, E.M.; Blesneac, A.; Zolog, D.N.; Kaller, R.; Muresan, A.V.; Arbanasi, E.M.; Melinte, I.M.; Niculescu, R.; Russu, E. Inflammatory Biomarkers as Prognostic Factors of Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis Following the Total Knee Arthroplasty. Medicina 2022, 58, 1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pasqui, E.; de Donato, G.; Lazzeri, E.; Molino, C.; Galzerano, G.; Giubbolini, M.; Palasciano, G. High Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios Are Associated with a Higher Risk of Hemodialysis Vascular Access Failure. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Forget, P.; Moreau, N.; Engel, H.; Cornu, O.; Kock, M.D.; Yombi, J.C. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) after surgery for hip fracture (HF). Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2015, 60, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Forget, P.; Philippe, D.; Harald, E.; Olivier, C.; Marc, D.K.; Jean, C.Y. Use of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a component of a score to predict postoperative mortality after surgery for hip fracture in elderly subjects. BMC Res. Notes 2016, 9, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Atlas, A.; Duran, E.; Pehlivan, B.; Pehlivan, V.F.; Erol, M.K.; Altay, N. The effect of increased neutrophil lymphocyte ratio on mortality in patients operated on due to hip fracture. Cureus 2020, 12, e6543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Wasko, M.K.; Struminski, M.; Bobecka-Wesolowska, K.; Kowalczewski, J. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio shows faster changing kinetics than C-reactive protein after total hip and knee arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Translat. 2017, 10, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xu, H.; Xie, J.; Zhang, S.; Wang, D.; Huang, Z.; Zhou, Z. Potential Blood Biomarkers for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ozturk, Z.A.; Yesil, Y.; Kuyumcu, M.E.; Bilici, M.; Ozturk, N.; Yesil, N.K.; Ozkaya, M.; Kisacik, B.; Kepekci, Y.; Ariogul, S. Inverse relationship between neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and bone mineral density (BMD) in elderly people. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2013, 57, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhou, M.; Li, S.; Pathak, J.L. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and osteocytes. Curr. Osteoporos Rep. 2019, 17, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Guler-Yuksel, M.; Hoes, J.N.; Bultink, I.E.M.; Lems, W.F. Glucocorticoids, inflammation and bone. Calcif Tissue Int. 2018, 102, 592–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hansson Göran, K.; Anna-Karin, L. Robertson, and Cecilia Söderberg-Nauclér. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 2006, 1, 297–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 12 00456 g001 550
Figure 1. Study population flowchart (inclusion and exclusion). * Exclusion criteria: patients diagnosed with pathological fracture, younger than age 65 years at admission or after recent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or steroid therapy.
Figure 1. Study population flowchart (inclusion and exclusion). * Exclusion criteria: patients diagnosed with pathological fracture, younger than age 65 years at admission or after recent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or steroid therapy.
Jcm 12 00456 g001
Jcm 12 00456 g002 550
Figure 2. Primary outcome (all-cause mortality) as a function of NLR. All-cause mortality during the first year following a proximal femur fracture surgery in 1551 elderly patients (altogether: 1278 (82.4%) lived, 273 (17.6%) died). NLR0: neutrophile/Lymphocyte ratio.
Figure 2. Primary outcome (all-cause mortality) as a function of NLR. All-cause mortality during the first year following a proximal femur fracture surgery in 1551 elderly patients (altogether: 1278 (82.4%) lived, 273 (17.6%) died). NLR0: neutrophile/Lymphocyte ratio.
Jcm 12 00456 g002
Jcm 12 00456 g003 550
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival function: All-cause mortality following proximal femur fracture fixation surgery in an elderly population (p < 0.001).
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival function: All-cause mortality following proximal femur fracture fixation surgery in an elderly population (p < 0.001).
Jcm 12 00456 g003
Table
Table 1. Neutrophile/lymphocyte ratio (NLR0) upon presentation of 1551 elderly patients with a proximal femur fracture. Values are presented as a mean ± standard deviation. CHF, chronic heart failure; CRF, chronic renal failure; DM, diabetes mellitus; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HTN, hypertension; IHD, ischemic heart disease; AF, atrial fibrillation; PAF, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Table 1. Neutrophile/lymphocyte ratio (NLR0) upon presentation of 1551 elderly patients with a proximal femur fracture. Values are presented as a mean ± standard deviation. CHF, chronic heart failure; CRF, chronic renal failure; DM, diabetes mellitus; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HTN, hypertension; IHD, ischemic heart disease; AF, atrial fibrillation; PAF, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
VariablePresentAbsentp Value
Sex male (n = 473, 31%)7.92 ± 5.529.83 ± 8.18<0.001
CHF (n = 393, 25.7%)7.81 ± 5.178.75 ± 6.910.014
CRF (n = 106, 6.9%)8.58 ± 6.478.5 ± 6.520.91
DM (n = 310, 20.3%)7.8 ± 5.628.67 ± 6.720.52
COPD (n = 66, 4.3%)10.29 ± 8.418.43 ± 6.410.023
HTN (n = 529, 34.6%)8.42 ± 6.028.56 ± 6.770.692
Dyslipidemia (n = 254, 16.6%)8.57 ± 6.498.5 ± 6.530.867
IHD (n = 164, 10.7%)6.67 ± 6.998.49 ± 6.460.73
AF/PAF (n = 117, 7.7%)8.56 ± 6.658.50 ± 6.510.936
Breast cancer (n = 32, 2.1%)7.79 ± 5.568.52 ± 6.540.532
Colon cancer (n = 12, 0.8%)8.39 ± 7.458.51 ± 6.510.951
Smoking (n = 118, 7.7%)8.57 ± 6.518.5 ± 6.520.919
Table
Table 2. Patients who underwent surgery for a proximal femur fracture. Categorical variables are presented as absolute counts with rates, and continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation. CHF, chronic heart failure; CRF, chronic renal failure; DM, diabetes mellitus; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HTN, hypertension; IHD, ischemic heart disease; AF, atrial fibrillation; PAF, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; CRIF, closed reduction internal fixation; THA, total hip arthroplasty; HA, hemi arthroplasty; MCV, mean corpuscle volume; RDW, red blood cell distribution; MPV, mean platelet volume.
Table 2. Patients who underwent surgery for a proximal femur fracture. Categorical variables are presented as absolute counts with rates, and continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation. CHF, chronic heart failure; CRF, chronic renal failure; DM, diabetes mellitus; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HTN, hypertension; IHD, ischemic heart disease; AF, atrial fibrillation; PAF, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; CRIF, closed reduction internal fixation; THA, total hip arthroplasty; HA, hemi arthroplasty; MCV, mean corpuscle volume; RDW, red blood cell distribution; MPV, mean platelet volume.
VariableLived Until at Least One Year after Surgery
(n = 1278, 82.4%)		Died during the First Year after Surgery
(n = 273, 17.6%)		Total (1551, 100%)p Value
Demographics
Age90.76 ± 1.9190.76 ± 1.7590.76 ± 1.880.783
Survival among sex group: <0.001
Male363 (74.8%)122 (25.2%)485 (100%, 31.3% of total)
Female915 (85.8%)151 (14.2%)1066 (100%, 68.7% of total)
Survival among patients with comorbidities
CHF320 (79.8%)81 (20.2%)401 (100%, 25.9% of total)0.067
CRF80 (72.1%)31 (27.9%)111 (100%, 7.2% of total)0.003
DM259 (81.2%)60 (18.8%)319 (100%, 20.6% of total)0.288
COPD55 (82.1%)12 (17.9%)67 (100%, 4.3% of total)0.525
HTN438 (81.3%)101 (18.7%)539 (100%, 34.8% of total)0.215
Dyslipidemia202 (78%)57 (22%)259 (100%, 16.7% of total)0.27
IHD126 (74.1%)44 (25.9%)170 (100%, 11% of total)0.003
AF/PAF88 (72.7%)33 (27.3%)121 (100%, 7.8% of total)0.004
Breast cancer28 (84.8%)5 (15.2%)33 (100%, 2.1% of total)0.463
Colon cancer7 (58.3%)5 (41.7%)12 (100%, 0.8% of total)0.044
Smoking109 (89.3%)13 (10.7%)122 (100%, 7.9% of total)0.02
Survival by surgery features
Type of operation 0.058
CRIF876 (81.9%)194 (18.1%)1070 (100%, 69.2% of total)
THA66 (93%)5 (7%)71 (100%, 4.6% of total)
HA334 (82.3%)72 (17.7%)406 (100%, 26.2% of total)
Duration of surgery (min)74.84 ± 62.4373.99 ± 46.0574.69 ± 59.850.831
Surgeon-Attending orthopedic surgeon773 (83.5%)153 (16.5%)926 (100%, 59.7% of total)0.096
Postoperative infection35 (81.4%)8 (18.6%)43 (100%, 2.8% of total)0.495
Second PF surgery46 (76.7%)14 (23.3%)60 (100%, 3.9% of total)0.155
Blood laboratory tests
NLR08.24 ± 6.059.8 ± 8.288.51 ± 6.52<0.001
White blood cells10.46 ± 4.351.058 ± 4.4910.48 ± 4.510.68
Hemoglobin11.11 ± 1.7510.59 ± 1.6811.02 ± 1.75<0.01
Platelets214.31 ± 73.32221.6 ± 98.58215.59 ± 78.670.163
MCV89.49 ± 6.1191.05 ± 7.489.77 ± 6.39<0.01
RDW14.24 ± 1.514.95 ± 1.9914.37 ± 1.62<0.01
MPV8.32 ± 1.28.25 ± 1.118.31 ± 1.190.402
Lymphocytes1.41 ± 2.411.15 ± 0.691.37 ± 2.210.087
Urea48.42 ± 22.2867.63 ± 38.651.76 ± 26.86<0.001
Creatinine1.07 ± 0.591.46 ± 1.161.14 ± 0.74<0.001
Calcium8.53 ± 0.588.47 ± 0.868.52 ± 0.640.282
Albumin3.19 ± 0.653.01 ± 0.383.16 ± 0.36<0.001
Table
Table 3. A Cox regression analysis: The dependent variable is a death (yes or no) during the first year following a surgery for a proximal femur fracture in the elderly population. The covariables have been detected as having a statistically significant association with the dependent variable on a preliminary univariate analysis. CRF, chronic renal failure; IHD, ischemic heart disease; AF, atrial fibrillation; PAF, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; MCV, mean corpuscle volume; RDW, red blood cell distribution.
Table 3. A Cox regression analysis: The dependent variable is a death (yes or no) during the first year following a surgery for a proximal femur fracture in the elderly population. The covariables have been detected as having a statistically significant association with the dependent variable on a preliminary univariate analysis. CRF, chronic renal failure; IHD, ischemic heart disease; AF, atrial fibrillation; PAF, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; MCV, mean corpuscle volume; RDW, red blood cell distribution.
VariableHazard Ratio95% Confidence Intervalp Value
Lower LimitUpper Limit
Demographics and comorbidities
Sex0.6320.4380.9120.014
CRF0.7340.4141.30.289
IHD1.4590.9242.3060.105
AF/PAF1.1750.6812.0280.561
Colon cancer1.4280.4644.3980.534
Smoking0.5560.2411.2830.169
Blood laboratory tests
NLR01.0241.0011.0470.041
Hemoglobin0.9960.8951.1080.938
MCV1.0260.9991.0530.063
RDW1.1251.0141.2490.026
Urea1.0211.0121.03<0.001
Creatinine0.8420.651.0890.19
Albumin0.340.2180.53<0.001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marom, O.; Paz, I.; Segal, D.; Topaz, G.; Abelson, N.; Tavdi, A.; Behrbalk, R.; Palmanovich, E.; Ohana, N.; Yaacobi, E. Proximal Femur Fractures in the Elderly—A Novel Modality to Predict Mortality: The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020456

AMA Style

Marom O, Paz I, Segal D, Topaz G, Abelson N, Tavdi A, Behrbalk R, Palmanovich E, Ohana N, Yaacobi E. Proximal Femur Fractures in the Elderly—A Novel Modality to Predict Mortality: The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(2):456. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020456

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marom, Omer, Inbar Paz, David Segal, Guy Topaz, Nitzan Abelson, Alex Tavdi, Refael Behrbalk, Ezequiel Palmanovich, Nissim Ohana, and Eyal Yaacobi. 2023. "Proximal Femur Fractures in the Elderly—A Novel Modality to Predict Mortality: The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 2: 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020456

APA Style

Marom, O., Paz, I., Segal, D., Topaz, G., Abelson, N., Tavdi, A., Behrbalk, R., Palmanovich, E., Ohana, N., & Yaacobi, E. (2023). Proximal Femur Fractures in the Elderly—A Novel Modality to Predict Mortality: The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(2), 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020456

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop