Next Article in Journal
T Cells Immunophenotyping and CD38 Overexpression as Hallmarks of the Severity of COVID-19 and Predictors of Patients’ Outcomes
Next Article in Special Issue
Can Liquid Biopsy Based on ctDNA/cfDNA Replace Tissue Biopsy for the Precision Treatment of EGFR-Mutated NSCLC?
Previous Article in Journal
Diagnostic Efficacy of Serum Asialo α1-Acid Glycoprotein Levels for Advanced Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Compared to That in Healthy Subjects: A Prospective Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Landscape and Predictive Significance of the Structural Classification of EGFR Mutations in Chinese NSCLCs: A Real-World Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/jcm12020709
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

KRAS Mutations in Solid Tumors: Characteristics, Current Therapeutic Strategy, and Potential Treatment Exploration

by
Yunkai Yang
,
Huan Zhang
,
Shanshan Huang
* and
Qian Chu
Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(2), 709; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020709
Submission received: 25 October 2022 / Revised: 21 December 2022 / Accepted: 22 December 2022 / Published: 16 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Target and Im-Oncology Therapeutic Approaches for Lung Cancer)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Kristen rat sarcoma (KRAS) gene is one of the most common mutated oncogenes in solid tumors. Yet, KRAS inhibitors did not follow suit with the development of targeted therapy, for the structure of KRAS has been considered as being implausible to target for decades. Chemotherapy was the initial recommended therapy for KRAS-mutant cancer patients, which was then replaced by or combined with immunotherapy. KRAS G12C inhibitors became the most recent breakthrough in targeted therapy, with Sotorasib being approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) based on its significant efficacy in multiple clinical studies. However, the subtypes of the KRAS mutations are complex, and the development of inhibitors targeting non-G12C subtypes is still at a relatively early stage. In addition, the monotherapy of KRAS inhibitors has accumulated possible resistance, acquiring the exploration of combination therapies or next-generation KRAS inhibitors. Thus, other non-target, conventional therapies have also been considered as being promising. Here in this review, we went through the characteristics of KRAS mutations in cancer patients, and the prognostic effect that it poses on different therapies and advanced therapeutic strategy, as well as cutting-edge research on the mechanisms of drug resistance, tumor development, and the immune microenvironment.

1. Introduction

Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) gene is one of the most common mutated oncogenes in numerous cancer types, such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer (CRC), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) [1]. It is a member of the rat sarcoma (RAS) viral oncogene family, and was first found in 1982 on the short arm of chromosome 12 in human lung cancer cells [2]. With KRAS lacking classical drug binding sites, the development of an inhibitor targeting KRAS mutations is extremely challenging, resulting in no breakthrough in KRAS-targeted therapy for a long time. Traditionally, chemotherapy has been used for patients with KRAS-mutant lung cancer and other solid tumors. With the development of immunotherapy in recent years, strategies have also been gradually developed for the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy for patients with KRAS mutations. The year of 2021 saw a breakthrough in KRAS-targeted drugs, with Sotorasib being approved for clinical use in patients with NSCLC and other solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations [3]. Adagrasib, another KRAS G12C inhibitor, also showed promising results in a phase-2 clinical trial of NSCLC patients in 2022 [4]. As research targeting the immune microenvironment of tumors has flourished, KRAS-related studies have also emerged. This review intends to summarize the characteristics of KRAS mutations in solid tumors, update the latest clinical therapeutic strategies, and discuss the mechanisms of drug resistance and tumor development, as well as the immune microenvironment.

2. Molecular Biological Functions of KRAS

The protein that KRAS encodes is a membrane-bound regulatory protein (G protein) that acts by binding guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) [5]. It usually acts as the switch altering its GTP-bound active state and GDP-bound inactive state, with a resynthesis half-life of ~24 h [6,7,8,9]. Guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), such as son of sevenless isoform 1 (SOS1) protein, functions to promote the active form of KRAS during this switch [10,11]. Such an alteration causes conformational changes of KRAS binding Raf proteins, activating downstream effectors that are in charge of cellular growth, differentiation, and survival. The deactivation of GTPase caused by oncogenic mutation accumulates the KRAS-GDP state, initiating downstream pathways such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway) [12,13]. In the MAPK pathway, activated KRAS-GTP causes a rapid increase in the number of serine/threonine-specific protein kinase (RAF) within cells localizing to the plasma membrane, leading to conformational change. The then activated RAF further binds to mitogen-activated protein kinase 1/2 (MEK1/2), activating extracellular regulated protein kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) via phosphorylation [14]. In the PI3K pathway, KRAS GTP binds to the p110s site of PI3K, leading to PI3K activation, which converts the phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-diphos-phate (PIP2) to phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP3). PIP3 promotes the phosphorylation of serine/threonine-protein kinase (AKT) by phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1), activating the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway [15]. Activated downstream signaling pathways regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and other cellular life activities [14,16].

3. KRAS Mutations in Cancers

3.1. Frequencies and Types of KRAS Mutations

According to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, KRAS mutations are present in approximately 11.6% of all carcinomas, the mutation rates and subtypes of which vary widely between tumors. KRAS mutations are most common in PDAC, with 81.72% of patients presenting KRAS mutations. CRC had the second highest KRAS mutation frequency, with a mutation frequency of 37.97%. KRAS mutations are present in approximately 21.20% of patients with NSCLC. In addition, KRAS mutations are mainly found in choloangiocarcinoma, uterine endometrial carcinoma, testicular germ cell cancer, and cervical squamous cell carcinoma, with a mutation frequency of about 12.7%, 14.1%, 11.7%, and 4.3%, respectively. KRAS mutations mainly contain 21 missense mutations, with G12D (29.19%), G12V (22.97%), and G12C (13.43%) being the most common. Studies from the TCGA database suggest that the prevalence of KRAS mutations in PDAC is the highest (over 80%) of all gene mutations, with G12D being the most common subtype; and that in CRC, KRAS G12D, and G12V are the two most common mutant subtypes. In all lung cancers, KRAS mutations mainly accounted for 11.2–25.3% of all mutations, with the KRAS G12C-type mutations accounting for 2.8–15% [17]. Specifically in NSCLC, KRAS G12C is the most common mutant subtype, accounting for roughly 45% of all KRAS mutations, followed by G12V and G12D [18]. Apart from the common tumor types, the landscape of the KRAS mutation in rare tumors is investigated, with an overall mutation rate of 8.7%; and G12D and G12V, along with G13D, are the most common subtypes [19]. The KRAS mutation frequency and subtype proportion in common cancers are summarized in Table 1. Mutations in KRAS, different mutant subtypes of KRAS, and other genetic co-alterations with the KRAS mutation may all have an impact on the clinicopathological features and prognoses of cancer patients.

3.2. Clinicopathological Characteristics of KRAS Mutations

KRAS mutations are associated with specific clinicopathological features in different tumors. In CRC, A study of left-sided, microsatellite stable CRC found that the proportion of KRAS-mutant patients is higher in the lung-metastatic cohort, while it is lower in the liver-metastatic cohort [20]. Another study of metastatic CRC showed that the regression of the KRAS mutation was associated with a better prognosis and oligo-metastatic status [21]. In NSCLC, KRAS mutations are seen in about 30% of lung adenocarcinomas and 5% of squamous lung cancers, in 26% of Westerners and 11% of Asians, and also in 30% of smokers and 10% of nonsmokers [22]. A study of lung adenocarcinoma patients found that KRAS mutations were significantly associated with older age (>45 years old) at diagnosis [23]. In addition, liver metastases and brain metastases occurred more frequently in NSCLC patients with KRAS mutations than in wild-type [24]. KRAS mutation was also found to be a biomarker of lower differentiation in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

3.3. Prognostic Value of KRAS Mutations

Numerous studies have shown that KRAS mutations can have an impact on the prognoses of cancer patients, although the results of different studies are somewhat contradictory regarding their specific impacts. Most of the current studies show an association with poor prognosis, and that subtypes and co-mutations may also have an impact.

3.3.1. Overall Impact of KRAS Mutations on Prognosis

In PDAC, more studies tend to consider KRAS mutations as a predictor of poor prognosis. A study including 39 PDAC patients found that patients with KRAS mutations, specifically the subtype of G12D, had a significantly worse overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) [25]. A study based on 110 PDAC patients reported that those with KRAS mutations have significantly shorter PFS and OS (5.3/6.9 months (p = 0.044) vs. 11.8/19.9 months (p = 0.037), respectively) [26]. Another study detecting the circulating cell-free tumor-DNA (cft-DNA) of 29 PDAC patients showed that the survival of patients with detectable plasma KRAS mutations pre-treatment was significantly worse (16.8 months vs. not reached, p < 0.031) [27]. A study comparing PDAC patients treated with surgery to chemotherapy showed that the detectable plasma KRAS mutation is an independent predictor of early recurrence after surgery, while not showing a significant difference in PFS after chemotherapy [28].
KRAS mutations have also been reported to have a negative impact on patients with colorectal cancer. A study of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) pump therapy in unresectable colorectal liver metastases showed that patients with KRAS mutations had worse responses to HAI chemotherapy, compared with wild-type patients [29]. A study of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors combined with third-line chemotherapy in metastatic CRC patients found that the RAS mutation was an independent predictor for shorter PFS [30]. A retrospective study based on locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) and proctectomy showed that KRAS mutations were not associated with a pathologic complete response (pCR), yet they were independently related to a worse prognosis [31]. Another study of stage IV CRC patients found a shorter OS for patients with KRAS mutations versus wild-type status (p = 0.004) [32]. A study using the National Cancer Database reported that KRAS mutations presented a worse OS than the KRAS wild-type in metastatic CRC patients under the age 70, while no significant association was detected above the age of 70 [33].
In the study of NSCLC, the prognostic impact of KRAS mutations is controversial. A retrospective study of Durvalumab in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC showed that patients with KRAS mutations had a better median PFS than EGFR and BRAF genetic mutations (not reached vs. 8.1 months vs. 7.8 months, p = 0.02) [34]. A study of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lung cancer patients with brain metastasis showed that KRAS mutations may drive a better efficacy of immunotherapy [35]. Despite these optimistic results, some reported that KRAS mutations might not have a significant impact on the prognoses of NSCLC patients. A multicenter cohort study of 1017 lung cancer patients of immunotherapy showed that the KRAS mutations had no significant impact on the response to ICIs in NSCLC patients [36]. Another meta-analysis regarding NSCLC patients concurred that no statistical OS improvement in KRAS mutant or KRAS wild-type patients [37]. A study of abemaciclib (a selective small-molecule CDK 4/6 inhibitor) combined with pembrolizumab in stage IV NSCLC patients showed that KRAS-mutant patients presented a better efficacy, yet a greater toxicity [38]. A study of stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with pembrolizumab as first-line monotherapy showed that KRAS has no prognostic impact on such treatment [39]. Another study of ICIs treating NSCLC patients with high programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression showed that the KRAS mutation status had no significant impact on the efficacy or safety of ICIs, though with a non-significant trend of worse survival in patients with KRAS G12C mutations [40]. A real-world study with 150 lung adenocarcinoma patients reported no significant difference in the PFS, OS, as well as first-line chemotherapy response among patients with or without KRAS mutations [41]. In conclusion, KRAS mutations may not have a significant impact on the prognosis of NSCLC patients.

3.3.2. Impacts of Different KRAS Mutation Subtypes on Prognosis

Different KRAS mutant subtypes may also present different impacts on prognosis. In NSCLC, a single-center cohort study of non-squamous NSCLC patients with KRAS mutations reported that patients with KRAS G12C mutations had a higher response rate (53.8% versus 8.3%, p = 0.030) and a longer PFS (4.8 months versus 2.1 months, p = 0.028) than those with mutations of other KRAS subtypes [42]. Such a finding might be controversial, considering that another real-world study based on 1039 NSCLC patients found no significant difference in treatment with ICI between patients with the KRAS wild type, G12C mutant, and other KRAS subtype mutations [43]. In CRC, a retrospective study comparing KRAS G12C mutations to other KRAS mutations in metastatic CRC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab showed that KRAS G12C had a significantly worse response rate (RR) than other subtypes (p = 0.017), while no difference in PFS (p = 0.76) and OS (p = 0.56) was observed [44]. A study of 419 CRC patients with unresectable liver metastases showed that the KRAS A146 mutations had a high tumor burden (TMB) and a worse OS compared with the G12 subtypes (median OS 10.7 months vs. 26.4 months; p = 0.003) [45].

3.3.3. Impact of KRAS Co-Alterations on Prognosis

The presence of genetic co-mutations in patients with KRAS mutations has also been reported in studies. According to current studies related to lung cancer patients with KRAS mutations, the most common co-mutated gene is tumor protein p53 gene (TP53), which accounts for about 39–42% of patients with KRAS mutations, followed by serine/threonine kinase 11 gene (STK11), accounting for about 20–30%, and kelch-like ECH associated protein 1 gene (KEAP1), accounting for about 13–27% [46,47]. In addition, there are co-mutated genes such as ATM serine/threonine kinase gene (ATM), MNNG HOS Transforming gene (MET), and erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 gene (ERBB2), which account for more than 10% of patients with KRAS mutated lung cancer [46].
Several features that coexist with KRAS mutations also have an impact on the prognosis of patients. In a retrospective study of 587 resected PDAC patients, the co-mutation of TP53 and KRAS G12D is shown to be an independent predictor of better OS and recurrence-free survival (RFS) [48]. In a study of HER2-mutant advanced gastric cancer patients treated with trastuzumab, KRAS mutation was found to be a predictor of insufficient efficacy and poor prognosis [49]. As for NSCLC, a study of 50 EGFR T790M-mutant NSCLC patients found that patients with TP53 R237C or KRAS G12V mutations cannot benefit from subsequent osimertinib treatment [50]. Another study of 946 patients reported that concomitant KRAS mutation and copy number gain (copy number ≥2) was a predictor of worse survival [51]. KRAS/STK11 co-mutations was reported to have a worse survival among all KRAS-mutant metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients [18]. In a study of NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy, patients with TP53/KRAS co-mutation were found to have a significantly longer PFS (5.8 vs. 2.6 months, p = 0.005) [52]. Another study of advanced lung adenocarcinoma showed that patients with KRAS mutations of all gene mutations had the best response to immunotherapy [53]. However, co-mutations may alter such efficacy, such as KRAS-mutant patients with STK11 or KEAP1, as co-mutations have a poorer prognosis for immunotherapy than KRAS wild-type lung adenocarcinoma patients [54].
Except from co-mutations, a High src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase 2 (SHP2) expression was reported to be a predictor of a better survival rate and a better efficacy of immunotherapy in a study of 61 KRAS-mutant advanced NSCLC patients [55]. A low expression level of serum deprivation protein response (SDPR) was found to be suppressing the immune system, independently correlated with a shorter OS in KRAS-mutant NSCLC patients [56]. Furthermore, a study based on 25 PDAC patients after R0/R1-resection showed that KRAS mutations combining a high carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level is a better predictor than individual markers, with an impact on early relapse and poorer OS, compared to those with KRAS wild-type or a low CA 19-9 level [57]. A high expression of both tyrosine phosphatase PTPN2 and LAMA3/AC245041.2 was found to be significantly related to the poor prognosis of KRAS-mutant patients with PDAC [58,59].

4. Therapeutic Strategies in KRAS-Mutant Cancers

The high incidence of KRAS makes it one of the most attractive and challenging therapeutic targets. Traditionally, patients with KRAS-mutant solid tumors were treated with chemotherapy, and the standard of care for patients with KRAS-mutant solid tumors is chemotherapy. In CRC, the median PFS of KRAS-mutant patients is 11.6 months, significantly worse than patients with wild-type KRAS [60]. Albuminpaclitaxel combined with gemcitabine is a first-line chemotherapy regimen that has been widely applied to pancreatic cancer, but most patients rapidly develop drug resistance after several courses of treatment [61]. The average OS of NSCLC patients with KRAS mutations treated with chemotherapy is less than 2 years [22]. The efficacy of conventionally applied chemotherapy for patients with KRAS mutations is limited and needs to be improved.
Since the development of immunotherapy, treatment options for patients with KRAS mutations have gradually entered the era of immunotherapy. In addition, many studies have explored the indirectly targeted therapy of upstream and downstream KRAS pathways, and recently, there has been a breakthrough in the directly targeted therapy of KRAS. The immunotherapeutic agents and targeted therapeutic agents currently under research, and their effects on the upstream and downstream pathways of KRAS can be seen in Figure 1.

4.1. Immunotherapy in KRAS-Mutant Cancers

With the application of monoclonal antibodies targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1) and its primary ligand PD-L1, the treatment paradigm for most advanced solid tumors has been fundamentally altered. Further studies have also been conducted in KRAS mutant tumors, and data shows that KRAS mutations may reshape the tumor immune microenvironment [62]. An analyzer powered by artificial intelligence based on hematoxylin and eosin showed that KRAS mutations were mostly found in the inflamed subtype of the immune microenvironment [63]. A study based on 202 patients of lung adenocarcinoma found that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were relatively abundant in more than 60% of cases, TTF1 positivity was found in 78.7% of cases, and PD-L1 positivity was found in 25.2% of cases [64]. The mechanisms of KRAS mutations regulating the immune microenvironment may include the secretion of neutrophil chemokines, the downregulation of major histocompatibility complex I (MHC I), the induction of regulatory T (Treg) cells, and the upregulation of PD-L1 [65]. These results all suggest that patients with KRAS mutations may benefit from immunotherapy.
In recent years, immunotherapy has shown advantages in treating patients with KRAS mutations, especially in NSCLC. A single-center, retrospective cohort study using ICIs as a first-line treatment for KRAS-mutant advanced NSCLC patients reported a median PFS of 16.2 months and a median OS of 31.3 months [66]. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-PD-(L)1 with chemo-monotherapy for advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC showed that patients treated with first- or second-line anti-PD-(L)1 with or without chemotherapy had longer OS and PFS than chemotherapy alone [67]. A study based on 44 NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression showed that patients with KRAS G12C mutations have a significantly longer PFS when treated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy [68]. A meta-analysis discussing the efficacy of immunotherapy in NSCLC patients with genetic mutations showed that ICIs significantly prolonged the OS of patients with KRAS mutations [69].
Combination strategies of immunotherapy and chemotherapy are also emerging, with most of the studies supporting that combination therapy has a better efficacy than monotherapy. A real-world retrospective study of 497 KRAS-mutant NSCLC patients reported that patients had a significantly longer survival when treated with chemoimmunotherapy than immunotherapy alone (median PFS 13.9 vs. 5.2 months, p = 0.049) [70]. According to the phase 3 Impower 150 trial, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy is an effective first-line therapy for KRAS-mutant NSCLC patients with STK11, KEAP1, or TP53 co-mutations [71]. A retrospective single-center study comparing PD-1 inhibitors combined with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) chemotherapy versus AG as the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer reported that PD-1+AG could improve the OS of patients with KRAS/TP53 co-mutations [72]. However, there also have been studies reporting different findings. A cohort study comparing ICIs monotherapy with chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC patients showed a better rate of survival in KRAS-mutant patients than wild-type patients, yet no significant difference was found between treatment strategies in the subgroup of KRAS-mutant patients [73].
In summary, immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy appears to provide greater clinical benefits in patients with KRAS mutations compared to immune monotherapy. However, it is worth noting that the PD-L1 expression level plays a more dominant role than KRAS mutations.

4.2. Direct and Indirect Inhibitors of KRAS

4.2.1. Directly Targeted Therapy

Direct targeting KRAS has long been considered difficult. As researchers have learned more about the structure of KRAS and the complex interactions involved in the RAS signaling protein family, they have been able to break through the perception that KRAS targets are “undruggable”, developing direct inhibitors of KRAS targets in recent years [74]. Drugs directly targeting KRAS have recently emerged with promising results. Sotorasib (AMG510) is currently the only FDA-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting KRAS G12C [3]. In the CodeBreaK 100 phase 2 single-arm trial, Sotorasib had an ORR of 37% and a median PFS of 6.7 months [75]. Adagrasib (MRTX849) performs well in the KRYSTAL-1 phase 1 and phase 2 trials, and it is expected to be the next approved drug targeting KRAS G12C [4,76]. ASP2453, a novel KRAS G12C inhibitor, showed antitumor efficacy in the preclinical models of KRAS G12C mutant cancers [77]. The latest clinical studies of all KRAS inhibitors are presented in Table 2.
Current clinical studies of KRAS inhibitors have shown promising results with multiple agents in a variety of solid tumors. The structural features of each subtype make G12C a breakthrough for KRAS inhibitors, but they also make it difficult for other subtypes to benefit from KRAS G12C inhibitors. Inhibitors for other subtypes are under investigation and are to be expected. However, most patients have previously received systemic immunotherapy or chemotherapy, so the evidence for their use as first-line therapy remains to be explored. Treatment strategies in combination with other therapies are still under investigation, yet the results are worth expecting.

4.2.2. Indirectly Targeted Therapy

Apart from drugs directly targeting KRAS, a number of indirectly targeted therapies targeting its upstream or downstream signaling pathway have also been developed. A study found that AZD0424 (an SRC inhibitor), when combined with MEK inhibitors (such as trametinib), inhibits tumor growth more than MEK inhibitor monotherapy, but does not reverse pre-existing MEK inhibitor resistance [78]. A study of KRAS G12R-mutant pancreatic cancer patients treated with selumetinib (KOSELUGO™; ARRY-142886, an oral MEK1/2 inhibitor) showed a median PFS of 3.0 months and a median OS of 9 months. Expectations were not met, and this group of patients should be considered for combination with other therapies [79]. The Traf2- and Nck-interacting protein kinase (TNIK) inhibitor NCB-0846 was found to enhance cell death induced by the BCL-X(L) inhibitor ABT-263 in KRAS/BRAF mutant cells, which may be a new combination treatment strategy for the KRAS/BRAF-mutant CRC [80]. Crenolanib, a TKI targeting tyrosine kinase receptors such as platelet-derived growth factor receptor A (PDGFRA), platelet-derived growth factor receptor B (PDGFRB), and FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3), may have clinical benefit for KRAS/BRAF-mutant CRC patients [81].
Some combination strategies have shown benefits as well. There is a retrospective study comparing bevacizumab plus capecitabine, with capecitabine monotherapy for KRAS-mutant metastatic CRC showing that combination therapy was better tolerated, and also contributing a longer PFS (9.0 months vs. 7.2 months, p < 0.05) [82]. Another study found that conventional mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy combined with cetuximab for KRAS-mutant CRC patients showed was shown to improve efficacy, reduce the overall incidence of adverse events (AEs), improve OS, and extend overall patient survival when adding simvastatin [83]. A phase 1 study of binimetinib (MEK inhibitor) plus carboplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy for stage-IV non-squamous NSCLC showed that the ORR of patients with KRAS/NRAS mutations was 62.5%, while wild-type patients had an ORR of 25% [84]. A phase 1b, multi-center study of binimetinib plus pemetrexed and cisplatin chemotherapy, followed by the maintenance of binimetinib and pemetrexed for advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC, reported an ORR of 33%, a median PFS of 5.7 months, and a median OS of 6.5 months, with no unacceptable AEs [85]. A study found that the sequential triple therapy of anti-PD-1 ICIs sequentially after fulvestrant (anti-estrogen) plus dacomitinib (a pan-HER inhibitor) had the potential for treating KRAS-mutant lung cancer [86]. In pancreatic cancer, an open-label, phase 2 RCT comparing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plus pembrolizumab and trametinib versus SBRT plus gemcitabine for locally recurrent pancreatic cancer post-operation reported that patients with KRAS mutations as well as high PD-L1 expression had a median OS of 14.9 and 12.8 months, respectively, with the major AEs being increased blood bilirubin and liver impairment [87]. The most recent clinical trials of non-KRAS-targeted therapies are presented in Table 3.

4.3. Other Unconventional Therapies

Some new progress has been made to cope with arising resistance towards conventional therapies. In CRC, a mutant Hydra actinoporin-like-toxin-1 (mHALT-1) immunotoxin was developed to treat KRAS G12V-mutant CRC patients, which showed cytotoxic effects in KRAS-mutant CRC cells [88]. 2-methoxyestradiol (2-ME), the superoxide dismutase inhibitor, showed synergistic effects with ABT-263 (a BCL-X(L) targeting agent) in KRAS-mutant CRC cell lines [89]. A study found that exosomes loaded with clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 could target the KRAS G12D-mutant allele in PDAC cells to suppress cell proliferation and tumor growth, making it a promising treatment strategy [90]. M-LIP-CLT, a hybrid nanoplatform capable of fusing Celastrol (CLT)-Loaded PEGylated lipids with the DC2.4 cell membrane, is an effective drug delivery system for PDAC-targeted therapy [91]. EAD1 is a synthesized analogue of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) that is found to make KRAS-mutant PDAC more sensitive to radiotherapy [92]. A study reported that cetuximab (CTX)-conjugated maleimide-polyethylene glycol-chlorin e6 (CMPC) is an immune-stimulating antibody-photosensitizer conjugate, and it can be used for KRAS-mutant PDAC, the mechanism of which is Fc-mediated dendritic cell phagocytosis and immunogenic cell death triggered by light [93]. Silvestrol (an eIF4A inhibitor) is reported to inhibit the overexpression of ARF6 and MYC driven by KRAS mutations, thus improving the efficacy of immunotherapy for PDAC [94].
In addition, Prochlorperazine (PCZ) is an antipsychotic drug reported to reverse the resistance of KRAS-mutant NSCLC cells to radiotherapy [95]. MicroRNA-16 is also found to restore the sensitivity of TKI therapy, with better performance than MEK inhibitors in KRAS-mutant NSCLC [96]. Melatonin is found to regulate the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) by inhibiting the YAP/PD-L1 axis, and it may be a novel therapy for KRAS-mutant NSCLC [97]. Luteolin and its derivative apigenin are reported to significantly suppress the expression of PD-L1 induced by IFN-γ, leading to the better anti-tumor activity of KRAS-mutant lung cancer, and a synergistic effect combined with PD-1 ICIs [98]. Statins can provoke the CD8+ T-cell immune response to KRAS-mutant tumors, and increase the sensitivity to PD-1 ICIs when combined with oxaliplatin [99]. More emerging therapies such as T-cell vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapy (ATC) are also under research [100]. Recent clinical trials of other unconventional therapies are presented in Table 4.

5. Advances in Drug Resistance and Oncological Mechanisms of KRAS-Mutant Cancers

Despite the significant innovation and clinical benefits in the treatment strategies for KRAS-mutant patients, drug resistance is still inevitable regardless of the treatment strategies. Therefore, research on drug resistance mechanisms and oncogenic mechanisms is urgently needed to overcome existing drug resistance and to improve the outcome of patients with KRAS mutations. This section will systematically discuss the latest research progress on drug resistance mechanisms and oncogenic mechanisms in patients with KRAS mutations to different therapies.

5.1. Drug Resistance of KRAS Inhibitors

The efficacy of KRAS inhibitors for treating patients with KRAS mutations varies. The mechanisms of resistance against KRAS inhibitors mainly include primary resistance and acquired resistance after receiving treatment. This section will elaborate on each in detail.

5.1.1. Primary Resistance

A low reliance on the KRAS pathway is the reason for primary drug resistance. Studies of KRAS-mutated cell lines in lung and pancreatic cancers have revealed that different cell lines have different degrees of dependence on KRAS [101]. A study of PDAC cell lines found that a subset of cells is not dependent on KRAS mutations, but instead is highly dependent on the PI3K-mediated MAPK pathway [102]. Studies have reported that the PI3K pathway can be activated by signalings other than KRAS [103], and that amplification and the overexpression of the transcriptional coactivator Yap1 can also drive KRAS-independent PDAC tumor maintenance [104]. The deubiquitin USP21 was also found to drive resistance to KRAS-targeted therapy in PDAC [105]. Alterations in the tumor immune microenvironment can also lead to primary drug resistance, such as the finding that tumor-associated macrophages can be recruited due to the effect of HDAC5 on chemokine, mediating SMAD4-dependent and KRAS-independent PDAC tumor growth [106].

5.1.2. Acquired Resistance

As the treatment population continues to expand, patients using KRAS inhibitors have developed resistance to the inhibitors, limiting their efficacy [1]. This may be explained with genetic alterations in nucleotide exchange function, adaptive mechanisms in downstream pathways, or newly emerged KRAS G12C mutations [107].
Mutations could disrupt covalent or potentially non-covalent drug binding [108]. For instance, clinical studies have reported on the development of the KRAS Y96D mutation in patients resistant to MRTX849, which affects the Switch-II pocket and can lead to resistance to all current KRAS G12C inhibitors [109]. Different KRAS secondary variants also cause resistance to different drugs, as it has been found that the G13D, R68M, A59S, and A59T mutations are resistant to AMG510 but sensitive to MRTX849, while the Q99L mutation has the opposite effect [110].
The negative feedback of upstream signals (such as EGFR) or downstream mediators (such as MEK) has also been demonstrated to attenuate the efficacy of KRAS inhibitors [111,112]. It was found that KRAS G12C inhibition is followed by the rapid adaptive RAS pathway feedback reactivation, driven by the RTK-mediated activation of wild-type RAS, which could not be inhibited by specific G12C inhibitors, requiring the combined inhibition of SHP2 to maintain its efficacy [113]. The EGFR and aurora kinase signaling pathways have also been found to reactivate KRAS through feedback regulation and maintain drug resistance in newly generated KRAS mutations [114].
Dysregulating FAK-YAP signaling and fibrosis formation is also found to cause attenuated treatment outcomes [115]. Inducing EMT to enhance PI3K/AKT signaling and MAPK signaling can also induce drug resistance [111,116]. The Transformation of pathology from adenocarcinoma to squamous cell carcinoma occurs in patients of solid tumors with KRAS mutations [108], and genetic alterations in cell cycle regulators is reported, causing cell cycle dysregulation to attenuate the therapeutic response of KRAS inhibitor [117]. MET amplification is found to induce resistance to KRAS inhibitors in NSCLC patients through RAS-dependent and non-dependent pathways, which can be reversed via MET/KRAS G12C dual inhibition [118]. HER2 has also been found to mediate resistance to KRAS inhibitors, which can be overcome by SHP2/KRAS G12C dual inhibition [119]. The mechanisms of acquired drug resistance are diverse and complex, and some studies have found that multiple mechanisms can occur simultaneously in the same patient [108], warranting further exploration.

5.2. Drug Resistances of Other Therapies

Apart from targeted therapies, patients with KRAS mutations also shown resistance to immunotherapy and radiotherapy. A possible mechanism is that KRAS mutations may promote an immunosuppressive TME of CRC through the inhibition of IRF2 and the recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [120]. Another study showed that KRAS-G12D mutations initiate the primary resistance of immunotherapy in NSCLC by suppressing the PD-L1 level via the P70S6K/PI3K/AKT axis, and reducing CXCL10/CXCL11 levels via the down-regulation of high mobility group protein A2 (HMGA2) level [121]. STK11/LKB1 mutations have been found to cause primary resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with KRAS-mutated lung adenocarcinoma [122]. KRAS mutations may also cause resistance to radiotherapy through the upregulation of NRF2-53BP1-mediated non-homologous end-joining repair [123].

5.3. Oncological Mechanisms of KRAS-Mutant Cancers

In addition to the development of more targeted agents to reverse existing drug resistance, preclinical studies in many other directions offer the possibility of future therapeutic directions as well. These studies may provide ideas for further improving patient outcomes, and delaying or overcoming drug resistance. We organized the corresponding research progress into two aspects: tumor cell characterization and immune microenvironment remodeling.

5.3.1. Tumor Proliferation, Survival, and Migration

In PDAC and CRC, a study based on the samples of seven PDAC patients found that blocking RAS downstream signaling and epigenetic pathways could synergistically increase the anti-proliferative activity of KRAS mutant PDAC cells [124]. A study found that PDAC cells regulate pH and glycolysis to increase carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) expression by stabilizing hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) 1-Alpha (HIF1A) and HIF2A during hypoxia; thus, the disruption of this pathway may slow the growth of PDAC xenograft tumors in mice, becoming a potential target pathway for pancreatic cancer [125]. A study based on public databases found that the inhibition of tensin 4 (TNS4) may be effective in treating patients with cetuximab-refractory CRC, including activated KRAS mutations [126].
In lung cancer, a study found that KRAS mutations could promote the cell growth of lung cancer cells with SLC3A2-NRG1 (S-N) fusion. An elevation of Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK and ERBB/PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways through disintegrin and metalloproteinase 17 (ADAM17)-mediated neuregulin 1 (NRG1) shedding was observed, indicating potential vulnerability to MEK1/2 and/or ADAM17 inhibitors in patients with concurrent KRAS mutation and S-N fusion [127]. A study based on cell experiments found that the simultaneous inhibition of activated Cdc42-associated kinase (ACK1) and AKT inhibited the growth and migration of KRAS-mutant NSCLC cells, providing the premise for the clinical translation of ACK1 and AKT inhibitors either as monotherapy or with rational combination [128]. GRP78 haploinsufficiency is reported to inhibit KRAS G12D-mediated tumor progression and prolong survival, and it is a potential therapeutic target for KRAS-mutant lung cancer [129]. It has also been found that regenerating family member (REG4) is highly expressed in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, and that silencing REG4 can inhibit cancer cell proliferation and genesis, making it a potential therapeutic target [130]. A study finds that the inhibition of phosphoglucomutase 3 (PGM3) reduces the growth of KRAS/LKB1 co-mutant lung tumors in both in vitro and in vivo settings, suggesting the potential for PGM3 targeted therapy in the KRAS-mutant population [131].
There are also some pan-cancer studies focusing on the oncogenic mechanism of KRAS mutations. KRAS-mutant cancer cells can produce exosomes that are enriched in Survivin, to promote cancer cell survival and resistance to therapy [132]. PTPN2 is reported to regulate the activation of KRAS mutations, as well as the proliferation and survival of cancer cells, making it a potential therapeutic target for KRAS-mutant cancers [58].

5.3.2. The Immune Microenvironment

In PDAC and CRC, a study found that resistance to anti-KRAS therapy may be driven by deubiquitinase USP21, which promotes KRAS-independent tumor growth by regulating MARK3-induced macrophagocytosis, and thus, USP21 may serve as a new target for the treatment of pancreatic cancer [105]. A study of 272 patients with metastatic CRC found statistically significant differences in neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.042), and systemic inflammation indices (p = 0.004) between the KRAS mutant group and the wild-type group [133]. A study based on 17,909 CRC patients found that rare KRAS mutation subtypes such as A59T were correlated with predictive immunotherapy response biomarkers [134]. The inhibition of ERK signaling was found to assist in reducing PD-L1 expression through autophagy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), indicating that ERK-targeted therapy may be combined with anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy for KRAS-mutant iCCA [135]. Equipping cetuximab on the surface of NK cells may solve the problem of cetuximab resistance in KRAS-mutant CRC [136].
In NSCLC, PD-L1 expression was found to be induced in KRAS G12V-mutant NSCLC and promote immune escape through the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β/EMT signaling pathway [137]. The correlation between low serum deprivation protein response (low SDPR) and immunosuppression in KRAS-mutant NSCLC was found, making low SDPR a possible prognostic factor for worse prognosis in KRAS-mutant NSCLC [56]. Th17 is found to cause resistance to MEK inhibitor combined with PD-L1 inhibitor therapy in lung cancer patients with KRAS/p53 mutations [138]. It was found that TRIM58 was positively correlated with an abundance of M2 macrophages and resting mast cells in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, and negatively correlated with an abundance of follicular helper T cells [139]. According to TCGA database, the PD-L1 protein expression level and immune cell infiltration are significantly decreased in the KRAS G12D/TP53 mutant group. Such co-mutation drives immunosuppression and may be a negative predictive biomarker for anti-PD-(L)1 ICIs in patients with lung adenocarcinoma [140].
In the research regarding all solid tumors, the KRAS mutation is reportedly immunogenic for CD4+ T cells and is a potential target for T-cell receptor (TCR)-based immunotherapy [141]. A study found that regulating ROS or inhibiting fibroblasts growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) signaling could abrogate the immunosuppression mediated by PD-L1, improving the efficacy of immunotherapy in KRAS-mutant cancers [142].

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

As mentioned above, immunotherapy is currently used mainly in the real world for patients with KRAS-mutant solid tumors. Clinical studies are gradually phased into target therapies, and more preclinical studies are considering other therapies such as T-cell vaccines. Sotorasib is the only FDA-approved KRAS G12C inhibitor, and has shown satisfying results in real-world studies. Immunotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy has been proven to be effective in treating patients with KRAS mutations as well.
However, more KRAS inhibitors targeting non-G12C subtypes are yet to be invented, and the acquired resistance of KRAS G12C inhibitors may reduce their efficacy. Co-mutations have the potential of interfering with the binding of KRAS inhibitors and their receptors, which is now the most acknowledged resistance mechanism. More research regarding the restoration of the sensitivity of targeted therapy is needed, and the immune microenvironment of KRAS-mutant tumors is worth exploring. In conclusion, the future of solid tumors with KRAS mutations is promising in terms of developing therapeutic strategies and overcoming drug resistance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Y.; investigation, Y.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.Y., H.Z. and S.H.; visualization, Y.Y. and H.Z.; supervision, S.H. and Q.C.; project administration, Q.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology of Hubei Province (No. YFXM2022000329) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82072597).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The figure in this review was created using Figdraw.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Q.; Fan, X.X.; Leung, E.L.; Yao, X.J.; Liu, L. Resistance looms for KRAS G12C inhibitors and rational tackling strategies. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 229, 108050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. McBride, O.W.; Swan, D.C.; Tronick, S.R.; Gol, R.; Klimanis, D.; Moore, D.E.; Aaronson, S.A. Regional chromosomal localization of N-ras, K-ras-1, K-ras-2 and myb oncogenes in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983, 11, 8221–8236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Zheng, X.; Luo, J.; Liu, W.; Ashby, C.R., Jr.; Chen, Z.S.; Lin, L. Sotorasib: A treatment for non-small cell lung cancer with the KRAS G12C mutation. Drugs Today 2022, 58, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jänne, P.A.; Riely, G.J.; Gadgeel, S.M.; Heist, R.S.; Ou, S.I.; Pacheco, J.M.; Johnson, M.L.; Sabari, J.K.; Leventakos, K.; Yau, E.; et al. Adagrasib in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring a KRAS(G12C) Mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 387, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Takai, Y.; Sasaki, T.; Matozaki, T. Small GTP-binding proteins. Physiol. Rev. 2001, 81, 153–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moore, A.R.; Rosenberg, S.C.; McCormick, F.; Malek, S. RAS-targeted therapies: Is the undruggable drugged? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020, 19, 533–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ostrem, J.M.; Shokat, K.M. Direct small-molecule inhibitors of KRAS: From structural insights to mechanism-based design. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016, 15, 771–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shukla, S.; Allam, U.S.; Ahsan, A.; Chen, G.; Krishnamurthy, P.M.; Marsh, K.; Rumschlag, M.; Shankar, S.; Whitehead, C.; Schipper, M.; et al. KRAS Protein Stability Is Regulated through SMURF2: UBCH5 Complex-Mediated β-TrCP1 Degradation. Neoplasia 2014, 16, W3–W5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Canon, J.; Rex, K.; Saiki, A.Y.; Mohr, C.; Cooke, K.; Bagal, D.; Gaida, K.; Holt, T.; Knutson, C.G.; Koppada, N.; et al. The clinical KRAS(G12C) inhibitor AMG 510 drives anti-tumour immunity. Nature 2019, 575, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vigil, D.; Cherfils, J.; Rossman, K.L.; Der, C.J. Ras superfamily GEFs and GAPs: Validated and tractable targets for cancer therapy? Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010, 10, 842–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hillig, R.C.; Sautier, B.; Schroeder, J.; Moosmayer, D.; Hilpmann, A.; Stegmann, C.M.; Werbeck, N.D.; Briem, H.; Boemer, U.; Weiske, J.; et al. Discovery of potent SOS1 inhibitors that block RAS activation via disruption of the RAS–SOS1 interaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 2551–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Drosten, M.; Barbacid, M. Targeting the MAPK Pathway in KRAS-Driven Tumors. Cancer Cell 2020, 37, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nussinov, R.; Wang, G.; Tsai, C.J.; Jang, H.; Lu, S.; Banerjee, A.; Zhang, J.; Gaponenko, V. Calmodulin and PI3K Signaling in KRAS Cancers. Trends Cancer 2017, 3, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Martinelli, E.; Morgillo, F.; Troiani, T.; Ciardiello, F. Cancer resistance to therapies against the EGFR-RAS-RAF pathway: The role of MEK. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2017, 53, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fresno Vara, J.Á.; Casado, E.; de Castro, J.; Cejas, P.; Belda-Iniesta, C.; González-Barón, M. P13K/Akt signalling pathway and cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2004, 30, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fruman, D.A.; Chiu, H.; Hopkins, B.D.; Bagrodia, S.; Cantley, L.C.; Abraham, R.T. The PI3K Pathway in Human Disease. Cell 2017, 170, 605–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Tan, A.C.; Tan, D.S.W. Targeted Therapies for Lung Cancer Patients with Oncogenic Driver Molecular Alterations. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 40, 611–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. El Osta, B.; Behera, M.; Kim, S.; Berry, L.D.; Sica, G.; Pillai, R.N.; Owonikoko, T.K.; Kris, M.G.; Johnson, B.E.; Kwiatkowski, D.J.; et al. Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic KRAS-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinomas: The Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium Experience. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2019, 14, 876–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, S.; Li, Q.; Ma, P.; Fang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Jiang, N.; Miao, H.; Tang, Q.; Yang, Y.; Xing, S.; et al. KRAS Mutation in Rare Tumors: A Landscape Analysis of 3453 Chinese Patients. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 831382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Z.; Zheng, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, Z.; Yu, J.; Yang, W.; Mao, B.; Zhang, H.; Li, J.; et al. Genetic differences between lung metastases and liver metastases from left-sided microsatellite stable colorectal cancer: Next generation sequencing and clinical implications. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021, 9, 967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ottaiano, A.; Nasti, G.; Santorsola, M.; Altieri, V.; Di Fruscio, G.; Circelli, L.; Luce, A.; Cossu, A.M.; Scognamiglio, G.; Perri, F.; et al. KRAS Mutational Regression Is Associated with Oligo-Metastatic Status and Good Prognosis in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 632962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ceddia, S.; Landi, L.; Cappuzzo, F. KRAS-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: From Past Efforts to Future Challenges. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hou, H.; Zhang, C.; Qi, X.; Zhou, L.; Liu, D.; Lv, H.; Li, T.; Sun, D.; Zhang, X. Distinctive targetable genotypes of younger patients with lung adenocarcinoma: A cBioPortal for cancer genomics data base analysis. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2020, 21, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Macerelli, M.; Caramella, C.; Faivre, L.; Besse, B.; Planchard, D.; Polo, V.; Ngo Camus, M.; Celebic, A.; Koubi-Pick, V.; Lacroix, L.; et al. Does KRAS mutational status predict chemoresistance in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? Lung Cancer 2014, 83, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Safi, S.A.; Haeberle, L.; Goering, W.; Keitel, V.; Fluegen, G.; Stoecklein, N.; Rehders, A.; Knoefel, W.T.; Esposito, I. Genetic Alterations Predict Long-Term Survival in Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Head. Cancers 2022, 14, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Itonaga, M.; Ashida, R.; Murata, S.I.; Yamashita, Y.; Hatamaru, K.; Tamura, T.; Kawaji, Y.; Kayama, Y.; Emori, T.; Kawai, M.; et al. Kras Gene Analysis Using Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens Predicts Therapeutic Responses and Prognosis in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schlick, K.; Markus, S.; Huemer, F.; Ratzinger, L.; Zaborsky, N.; Clemens, H.; Neureiter, D.; Neumayer, B.; Beate, A.S.; Florian, S.; et al. Evaluation of circulating cell-free KRAS mutational status as a molecular monitoring tool in patients with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 2021, 21, 1466–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ako, S.; Kato, H.; Nouso, K.; Kinugasa, H.; Terasawa, H.; Matushita, H.; Takada, S.; Saragai, Y.; Mizukawa, S.; Muro, S.; et al. Plasma KRAS mutations predict the early recurrence after surgical resection of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2021, 22, 564–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kolbeinsson, H.M.; Preihs, R.; Bengel, A.; Chandana, S.; Assifi, M.M.; Chung, M.H.; Wright, G.P. Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) oncogene mutation predicts magnitude of response and outcomes in hepatic arterial infusion pump therapy of unresectable colorectal liver metastases. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2022, 13, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sato, T.; Osumi, H.; Shinozaki, E.; Ooki, A.; Shimozaki, K.; Kamiimabeppu, D.; Nakayama, I.; Wakatsuki, T.; Ogura, M.; Takahari, D.; et al. Clinical Impact of Primary Tumor Location and RAS, BRAF V600E, and PIK3CA Mutations on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Efficacy as Third-line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2021, 41, 3905–3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Díez-Alonso, M.; Mendoza-Moreno, F.; Jiménez-Álvarez, L.; Nuñez, O.; Blazquez-Martín, A.; Sanchez-Gollarte, A.; Matías-García, B.; Molina, R.; San-Juan, A.; Gutierrez-Calvo, A. Prognostic factors of survival in stage IV colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: Negative effect of the KRAS mutation. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 14, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Uhlig, J.; Cecchini, M.; Sheth, A.; Stein, S.; Lacy, J.; Kim, H.S. Microsatellite Instability and KRAS Mutation in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: Prevalence, Geographic Discrepancies, and Outcomes From the National Cancer Database. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2021, 19, 307–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ozer, M.; Goksu, S.Y.; Sanford, N.N.; Ahn, C.; Beg, M.S.; Ali Kazmi, S.M. Age-dependent prognostic value of KRAS mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer. Future Oncol. 2021, 17, 4883–4893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Riudavets, M.; Auclin, E.; Mosteiro, M.; Dempsey, N.; Majem, M.; Lobefaro, R.; López-Castro, R.; Bosch-Barrera, J.; Pilotto, S.; Escalera, E.; et al. Durvalumab consolidation in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer with driver genomic alterations. Eur. J. Cancer 2022, 167, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lauko, A.; Kotecha, R.; Barnett, A.; Li, H.; Tatineni, V.; Ali, A.; Patil, P.; Mohammadi, A.M.; Chao, S.T.; Murphy, E.S.; et al. Impact of KRAS mutation status on the efficacy of immunotherapy in lung cancer brain metastases. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 18174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yoh, K.; Matsumoto, S.; Furuya, N.; Nishino, K.; Miyamoto, S.; Oizumi, S.; Okamoto, N.; Itani, H.; Kuyama, S.; Nakamura, A.; et al. Comprehensive assessment of PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden and oncogenic driver alterations in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Lung Cancer 2021, 159, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Xie, J.; Chen, M.; Liu, H.; Zhan, P.; Lv, T.; Song, Y. The Predictive Value of Clinical and Molecular Characteristics or Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 732214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pujol, J.L.; Vansteenkiste, J.; Paz-Ares Rodríguez, L.; Gregorc, V.; Mazieres, J.; Awad, M.; Jänne, P.A.; Chisamore, M.; Hossain, A.M.; Chen, Y.; et al. Abemaciclib in Combination with Pembrolizumab for Stage IV KRAS-Mutant or Squamous NSCLC: A Phase 1b Study. JTO Clin. Res. Rep. 2021, 2, 100234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Noordhof, A.L.; Damhuis, R.A.M.; Hendriks, L.E.L.; de Langen, A.J.; Timens, W.; Venmans, B.J.W.; van Geffen, W.H. Prognostic impact of KRAS mutation status for patients with stage IV adenocarcinoma of the lung treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy. Lung Cancer 2021, 155, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kartolo, A.; Feilotter, H.; Hopman, W.; Fung, A.S.; Robinson, A. A single institution study evaluating outcomes of PD-L1 high KRAS-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with first line immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Treat. Res. Commun. 2021, 27, 100330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gökyer, A.; Küçükarda, A.; Köstek, O.; Gökmen, İ.; Özcan, E.; Sayın, S.; Taştekin, E.; Hacıoğlu, B.; Erdoğan, B.; Uzunoğlu, S.; et al. Comparison of real-life data from patients with NGS panel negative and KRAS mutation positive metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Tumori 2022, 108, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wu, S.G.; Liao, W.Y.; Su, K.Y.; Yu, S.L.; Huang, Y.L.; Yu, C.J.; Chih-Hsin Yang, J.; Shih, J.Y. Prognostic Characteristics and Immunotherapy Response of Patients with Nonsquamous NSCLC with Kras Mutation in East Asian Populations: A Single-Center Cohort Study in Taiwan. JTO Clin. Res. Rep. 2021, 2, 100140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sebastian, M.; Eberhardt, W.E.E.; Hoffknecht, P.; Metzenmacher, M.; Wehler, T.; Kokowski, K.; Alt, J.; Schütte, W.; Büttner, R.; Heukamp, L.C.; et al. KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world cohort from the German prospective, observational, nation-wide CRISP Registry (AIO-TRK-0315). Lung Cancer 2021, 154, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Giampieri, R.; Lupi, A.; Ziranu, P.; Bittoni, A.; Pretta, A.; Pecci, F.; Persano, M.; Giglio, E.; Copparoni, C.; Crocetti, S.; et al. Retrospective Comparative Analysis of KRAS G12C vs. Other KRAS Mutations in mCRC Patients Treated with First-Line Chemotherapy Doublet + Bevacizumab. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 736104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Van’t Erve, I.; Wesdorp, N.J.; Medina, J.E.; Ferreira, L.; Leal, A.; Huiskens, J.; Bolhuis, K.; van Waesberghe, J.T.M.; Swijnenburg, R.J.; van den Broek, D.; et al. KRAS A146 Mutations Are Associated with Distinct Clinical Behavior in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases. JCO Precis. Oncol. 2021, 5, 1758–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Scheffler, M.; Ihle, M.A.; Hein, R.; Merkelbach-Bruse, S.; Scheel, A.H.; Siemanowski, J.; Brägelmann, J.; Kron, A.; Abedpour, N.; Ueckeroth, F.; et al. K-ras Mutation Subtypes in NSCLC and Associated Co-occuring Mutations in Other Oncogenic Pathways. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2019, 14, 606–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Arbour, K.C.; Jordan, E.; Kim, H.R.; Dienstag, J.; Yu, H.A.; Sanchez-Vega, F.; Lito, P.; Berger, M.; Solit, D.B.; Hellmann, M.; et al. Effects of Co-occurring Genomic Alterations on Outcomes in Patients with KRAS-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Shoucair, S.; Habib, J.R.; Pu, N.; Kinny-Köster, B.; van Ooston, A.F.; Javed, A.A.; Lafaro, K.J.; He, J.; Wolfgang, C.L.; Yu, J. Comprehensive Analysis of Somatic Mutations in Driver Genes of Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Reveals KRAS G12D and Mutant TP53 Combination as an Independent Predictor of Clinical Outcome. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2022, 29, 2720–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shimozaki, K.; Shinozaki, E.; Yamamoto, N.; Imamura, Y.; Osumi, H.; Nakayama, I.; Wakatsuki, T.; Ooki, A.; Takahari, D.; Ogura, M.; et al. KRAS mutation as a predictor of insufficient trastuzumab efficacy and poor prognosis in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2022. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00432-022-03966-7#citeas (accessed on 29 November 2021). [CrossRef]
  50. Fu, Y.; Wang, A.; Zhou, J.; Feng, W.; Shi, M.; Xu, X.; Zhao, H.; Cai, L.; Feng, J.; Lv, X.; et al. Advanced NSCLC Patients with EGFR T790M Harboring TP53 R273C or KRAS G12V Cannot Benefit From Osimertinib Based on a Clinical Multicentre Study by Tissue and Liquid Biopsy. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 621992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fung, A.S.; Karimi, M.; Michiels, S.; Seymour, L.; Brambilla, E.; Le-Chevalier, T.; Soria, J.C.; Kratzke, R.; Graziano, S.L.; Devarakonda, S.; et al. Prognostic and predictive effect of KRAS gene copy number and mutation status in early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2021, 10, 826–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wang, S.; Jiang, M.; Yang, Z.; Huang, X.; Li, N. The role of distinct co-mutation patterns with TP53 mutation in immunotherapy for NSCLC. Genes Dis. 2022, 9, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sholl, L.M. Biomarkers of response to checkpoint inhibitors beyond PD-L1 in lung cancer. Mod. Pathol. 2022, 35, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ricciuti, B.; Arbour, K.C.; Lin, J.J.; Vajdi, A.; Vokes, N.; Hong, L.; Zhang, J.; Tolstorukov, M.Y.; Li, Y.Y.; Spurr, L.F.; et al. Diminished Efficacy of Programmed Death-(Ligand)1 Inhibition in STK11- and KEAP1-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma Is Affected by KRAS Mutation Status. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2022, 17, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Feng, H.B.; Chen, Y.; Xie, Z.; Jiang, J.; Zhong, Y.M.; Guo, W.B.; Yan, W.Q.; Lv, Z.Y.; Lu, D.X.; Liang, H.L.; et al. High SHP2 expression determines the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac. Cancer 2021, 12, 2564–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Luo, X.; Peng, S.; Ding, S.; Zeng, Q.; Wang, R.; Ma, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W. Prognostic values, ceRNA network, and immune regulation function of SDPR in KRAS-mutant lung cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2021, 21, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hussung, S.; Akhoundova, D.; Hipp, J.; Follo, M.; Klar, R.F.U.; Philipp, U.; Scherer, F.; von Bubnoff, N.; Duyster, J.; Boerries, M.; et al. Longitudinal analysis of cell-free mutated KRAS and CA 19-9 predicts survival following curative resection of pancreatic cancer. BMC Cancer 2021, 21, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Huang, Z.; Liu, M.; Li, D.; Tan, Y.; Zhang, R.; Xia, Z.; Wang, P.; Jiao, B.; Liu, P.; Ren, R. PTPN2 regulates the activation of KRAS and plays a critical role in proliferation and survival of KRAS-driven cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 18343–18354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tian, C.; Li, X.; Ge, C. High expression of LAMA3/AC245041.2 gene pair associated with KRAS mutation and poor survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A comprehensive TCGA analysis. Mol. Med. 2021, 27, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zocche, D.M.; Ramirez, C.; Fontao, F.M.; Costa, L.D.; Redal, M.A. Global impact of KRAS mutation patterns in FOLFOX treated metastatic colorectal cancer. Front. Genet. 2015, 6, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dai, M.; Chen, S.; Teng, X.; Chen, K.; Cheng, W. KRAS as a Key Oncogene in the Clinical Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer. J. Cancer 2022, 13, 3209–3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hafezi, S.; Saber-Ayad, M.; Abdel-Rahman, W.M. Highlights on the Role of KRAS Mutations in Reshaping the Microenvironment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Park, J.; Cho, H.G.; Park, J.; Lee, G.; Kim, H.S.; Paeng, K.; Song, S.; Park, G.; Ock, C.Y.; Chae, Y.K. Artificial Intelligence-Powered Hematoxylin and Eosin Analyzer Reveals Distinct Immunologic and Mutational Profiles among Immune Phenotypes in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 2022, 192, 701–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pirlog, R.; Piton, N.; Lamy, A.; Guisier, F.; Berindan-Neagoe, I.; Sabourin, J.C.; Marguet, F. Morphological and Molecular Characterization of KRAS G12C-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinomas. Cancers 2022, 14, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Dias Carvalho, P.; Machado, A.L.; Martins, F.; Seruca, R.; Velho, S. Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment: An Unexplored Strategy for Mutant KRAS Tumors. Cancers 2019, 11, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Uehara, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Hakozaki, T.; Yomota, M.; Hosomi, Y. Efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced NSCLC with KRAS, MET, FGFR, RET, BRAF, and HER2 alterations. Thorac Cancer 2022, 13, 1703–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Landre, T.; Justeau, G.; Assié, J.B.; Chouahnia, K.; Davoine, C.; Taleb, C.; Chouaïd, C.; Duchemann, B. Anti-PD-(L)1 for KRAS-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancers: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2022, 71, 719–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cefalì, M.; Epistolio, S.; Ramelli, G.; Mangan, D.; Molinari, F.; Martin, V.; Freguia, S.; Mazzucchelli, L.; Froesch, P.; Frattini, M.; et al. Correlation of KRAS G12C Mutation and High PD-L1 Expression with Clinical Outcome in NSCLC Patients Treated with Anti-PD1 Immunotherapy. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, R.; Zhu, J.; Liu, Y.; Xin, Y.; Wang, Y.; Niu, K.; Wei, H. Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients with different genes mutation: A meta-analysis. Medicine 2021, 100, e19713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, H.; Huang, D.; Lin, G.; Yang, X.; Zhuo, M.; Chi, Y.; Zhai, X.; Jia, B.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; et al. The prevalence and real-world therapeutic analysis of Chinese patients with KRAS-Mutant Non-Small Cell lung cancer. Cancer Med. 2022, 11, 3581–3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. West, H.J.; McCleland, M.; Cappuzzo, F.; Reck, M.; Mok, T.S.; Jotte, R.M.; Nishio, M.; Kim, E.; Morris, S.; Zou, W.; et al. Clinical efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with STK11, KEAP1, or TP53 comutations: Subgroup results from the phase III IMpower150 trial. J. Immunother. Cancer 2022, 10, e003027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Zhang, F.; Wang, Y.; Yang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, X. The Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitors Combined with Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine versus Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Monocentric Study. Cancer Manag. Res. 2022, 14, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sun, L.; Hsu, M.; Cohen, R.B.; Langer, C.J.; Mamtani, R.; Aggarwal, C. Association Between KRAS Variant Status and Outcomes with First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Therapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2021, 7, 937–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Reck, M.; Carbone, D.P.; Garassino, M.; Barlesi, F. Targeting KRAS in non-small-cell lung cancer: Recent progress and new approaches. Ann. Oncol. 2021, 32, 1101–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Skoulidis, F.; Li, B.T.; Dy, G.K.; Price, T.J.; Falchook, G.S.; Wolf, J.; Italiano, A.; Schuler, M.; Borghaei, H.; Barlesi, F.; et al. Sotorasib for Lung Cancers with KRAS p.G12C Mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 2371–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Xu, Q.; Zhang, G.; Liu, Q.; Li, S.; Zhang, Y. Inhibitors of the GTPase KRAS(G12C) in cancer: A patent review (2019–2021). Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2022, 32, 475–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nakayama, A.; Nagashima, T.; Nishizono, Y.; Kuramoto, K.; Mori, K.; Homboh, K.; Yuri, M.; Shimazaki, M. Characterisation of a novel KRAS G12C inhibitor ASP2453 that shows potent anti-tumour activity in KRAS G12C-mutated preclinical models. Br. J. Cancer 2022, 126, 744–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Dawson, J.C.; Munro, A.; Macleod, K.; Muir, M.; Timpson, P.; Williams, R.J.; Frame, M.; Brunton, V.G.; Carragher, N.O. Pathway profiling of a novel SRC inhibitor, AZD0424, in combination with MEK inhibitors for cancer treatment. Mol. Oncol. 2022, 16, 1072–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kenney, C.; Kunst, T.; Webb, S.; Christina, D., Jr.; Arrowood, C.; Steinberg, S.M.; Mettu, N.B.; Kim, E.J.; Rudloff, U. Phase II study of selumetinib, an orally active inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2 kinases, in KRAS(G12R)-mutant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Investig. N. Drugs 2021, 39, 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jung, H.R.; Oh, Y.; Na, D.; Min, S.; Kang, J.; Jang, D.; Shin, S.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.E.; Jeong, E.M.; et al. CRISPR screens identify a novel combination treatment targeting BCL-X(L) and WNT signaling for KRAS/BRAF-mutated colorectal cancers. Oncogene 2021, 40, 3287–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fujino, S.; Miyoshi, N.; Ito, A.; Yasui, M.; Ohue, M.; Ogino, T.; Takahashi, H.; Uemura, M.; Matsuda, C.; Mizushima, T.; et al. Crenolanib Regulates ERK and AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathways in RAS/BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer Cells and Organoids. Mol. Cancer Res. 2021, 19, 812–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Huang, W.; Zhang, H.; Tian, Y.; Cha, Y.; Xiong, H.; Yuan, X. Efficacy and safety analysis of bevacizumab combined with capecitabine in the maintenance treatment of RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2022, 47, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Li, G.; Liu, J. Analysis of Efficacy, Safety, and Prognostic Factors of mFOLFOX6 Regimen Combined with Cetuximab and Simvastatin in the Treatment of K-RAS Mutant Colorectal Cancer. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2021, 2021, 2280440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Fung, A.S.; Graham, D.M.; Chen, E.X.; Stockley, T.L.; Zhang, T.; Le, L.W.; Albaba, H.; Pisters, K.M.; Bradbury, P.A.; Trinkaus, M.; et al. A phase I study of binimetinib (MEK 162), a MEK inhibitor, plus carboplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2021, 157, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Froesch, P.; Mark, M.; Rothschild, S.I.; Li, Q.; Godar, G.; Rusterholz, C.; Oppliger Leibundgut, E.; Schmid, S.; Colombo, I.; Metaxas, Y.; et al. Binimetinib, pemetrexed and cisplatin, followed by maintenance of binimetinib and pemetrexed in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and KRAS mutations. The phase 1B SAKK 19/16 trial. Lung Cancer 2021, 156, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Almotlak, A.A.; Farooqui, M.; Soloff, A.C.; Siegfried, J.M.; Stabile, L.P. Targeting the ERβ/HER Oncogenic Network in KRAS Mutant Lung Cancer Modulates the Tumor Microenvironment and Is Synergistic with Sequential Immunotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 23, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhu, X.; Cao, Y.; Liu, W.; Ju, X.; Zhao, X.; Jiang, L.; Ye, Y.; Jin, G.; Zhang, H. Stereotactic body radiotherapy plus pembrolizumab and trametinib versus stereotactic body radiotherapy plus gemcitabine for locally recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgical resection: An open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022, 23, e105–e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Teo, M.Y.M.; Ng, J.J.C.; Fong, J.Y.; Hwang, J.S.; Song, A.A.; Lim, R.L.H.; In, L.L.A. Development of a single-chain fragment variable fused-mutant HALT-1 recombinant immunotoxin against G12V mutated KRAS colorectal cancer cells. PeerJ 2021, 9, e11063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Oh, Y.; Jung, H.R.; Min, S.; Kang, J.; Jang, D.; Shin, S.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.E.; Sung, C.O.; Lee, W.S.; et al. Targeting antioxidant enzymes enhances the therapeutic efficacy of the BCL-X(L) inhibitor ABT-263 in KRAS-mutant colorectal cancers. Cancer Lett. 2021, 497, 123–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. McAndrews, K.M.; Xiao, F.; Chronopoulos, A.; LeBleu, V.S.; Kugeratski, F.G.; Kalluri, R. Exosome-mediated delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 for targeting of oncogenic Kras(G12D) in pancreatic cancer. Life Sci. Alliance 2021, 4, e202000875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Deng, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, S.; Du, Z.; Lin, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L. An exosome-mimicking membrane hybrid nanoplatform for targeted treatment toward Kras-mutant pancreatic carcinoma. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 5599–5611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Yazal, T.; Bailleul, J.; Ruan, Y.; Sung, D.; Chu, F.I.; Palomera, D.; Dao, A.; Sehgal, A.; Gurunathan, V.; Aryan, L.; et al. Radiosensitizing Pancreatic Cancer via Effective Autophagy Inhibition. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2022, 21, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kim, D.; Lee, S.; Na, K. Immune Stimulating Antibody-Photosensitizer Conjugates via Fc-Mediated Dendritic Cell Phagocytosis and Phototriggered Immunogenic Cell Death for KRAS-Mutated Pancreatic Cancer Treatment. Small 2021, 17, e2006650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hashimoto, A.; Handa, H.; Hata, S.; Tsutaho, A.; Yoshida, T.; Hirano, S.; Hashimoto, S.; Sabe, H. Inhibition of mutant KRAS-driven overexpression of ARF6 and MYC by an eIF4A inhibitor drug improves the effects of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Cell Commun. Signal. 2021, 19, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sad, K.; Parashar, P.; Tripathi, P.; Hungyo, H.; Sistla, R.; Soni, R.; Tandon, V. Prochlorperazine enhances radiosensitivity of non-small cell lung carcinoma by stabilizing GDP-bound mutant KRAS conformation. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2021, 177, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Fanini, F.; Bandini, E.; Plousiou, M.; Carloni, S.; Wise, P.; Neviani, P.; Murtadha, M.; Foca, F.; Fabbri, F.; Vannini, I.; et al. MicroRNA-16 Restores Sensitivity to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Outperforms MEK Inhibitors in KRAS-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chao, Y.C.; Lee, K.Y.; Wu, S.M.; Kuo, D.Y.; Shueng, P.W.; Lin, C.W. Melatonin Downregulates PD-L1 Expression and Modulates Tumor Immunity in KRAS-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jiang, Z.B.; Wang, W.J.; Xu, C.; Xie, Y.J.; Wang, X.R.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Huang, J.M.; Huang, M.; Xie, C.; Liu, P.; et al. Luteolin and its derivative apigenin suppress the inducible PD-L1 expression to improve anti-tumor immunity in KRAS-mutant lung cancer. Cancer Lett. 2021, 515, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Nam, G.H.; Kwon, M.; Jung, H.; Ko, E.; Kim, S.A.; Choi, Y.; Song, S.J.; Kim, S.; Lee, Y.; Kim, G.B.; et al. Statin-mediated inhibition of RAS prenylation activates ER stress to enhance the immunogenicity of KRAS mutant cancer. J. Immunother. Cancer 2021, 9, e002474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Nagasaka, M.; Potugari, B.; Nguyen, A.; Sukari, A.; Azmi, A.S.; Ou, S.I. KRAS Inhibitors- yes but what next? Direct targeting of KRAS- vaccines, adoptive T cell therapy and beyond. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2021, 101, 102309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Singh, A.; Greninger, P.; Rhodes, D.; Koopman, L.; Violette, S.; Bardeesy, N.; Settleman, J. A gene expression signature associated with "K-Ras addiction" reveals regulators of EMT and tumor cell survival. Cancer Cell 2009, 15, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Muzumdar, M.D.; Chen, P.Y.; Dorans, K.J.; Chung, K.M.; Bhutkar, A.; Hong, E.; Noll, E.M.; Sprick, M.R.; Trumpp, A.; Jacks, T. Survival of pancreatic cancer cells lacking KRAS function. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Franke, T.F. PI3K/Akt: Getting it right matters. Oncogene 2008, 27, 6473–6488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Kapoor, A.; Yao, W.; Ying, H.; Hua, S.; Liewen, A.; Wang, Q.; Zhong, Y.; Wu, C.J.; Sadanandam, A.; Hu, B.; et al. Yap1 activation enables bypass of oncogenic Kras addiction in pancreatic cancer. Cell 2014, 158, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Hou, P.; Ma, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, C.J.; Li, J.; Tan, L.; Yao, W.; Yan, L.; Zhou, X.; et al. USP21 deubiquitinase elevates macropinocytosis to enable oncogenic KRAS bypass in pancreatic cancer. Genes Dev. 2021, 35, 1327–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Hou, P.; Kapoor, A.; Zhang, Q.; Li, J.; Wu, C.J.; Li, J.; Lan, Z.; Tang, M.; Ma, X.; Ackroyd, J.J.; et al. Tumor Microenvironment Remodeling Enables Bypass of Oncogenic KRAS Dependency in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2020, 10, 1058–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Reita, D.; Pabst, L.; Pencreach, E.; Guérin, E.; Dano, L.; Rimelen, V.; Voegeli, A.C.; Vallat, L.; Mascaux, C.; Beau-Faller, M. Direct Targeting KRAS Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Focus on Resistance. Cancers 2022, 14, 1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Awad, M.M.; Liu, S.; Rybkin, I.I.; Arbour, K.C.; Dilly, J.; Zhu, V.W.; Johnson, M.L.; Heist, R.S.; Patil, T.; Riely, G.J.; et al. Acquired Resistance to KRAS(G12C) Inhibition in Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 2382–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Tanaka, N.; Lin, J.J.; Li, C.; Ryan, M.B.; Zhang, J.; Kiedrowski, L.A.; Michel, A.G.; Syed, M.U.; Fella, K.A.; Sakhi, M.; et al. Clinical Acquired Resistance to KRAS(G12C) Inhibition through a Novel KRAS Switch-II Pocket Mutation and Polyclonal Alterations Converging on RAS-MAPK Reactivation. Cancer Discov. 2021, 11, 1913–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Koga, T.; Suda, K.; Fujino, T.; Ohara, S.; Hamada, A.; Nishino, M.; Chiba, M.; Shimoji, M.; Takemoto, T.; Arita, T.; et al. KRAS Secondary Mutations That Confer Acquired Resistance to KRAS G12C Inhibitors, Sotorasib and Adagrasib, and Overcoming Strategies: Insights From In Vitro Experiments. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2021, 16, 1321–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Akhave, N.S.; Biter, A.B.; Hong, D.S. Mechanisms of Resistance to KRAS(G12C)-Targeted Therapy. Cancer Discov. 2021, 11, 1345–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Misale, S.; Arena, S.; Lamba, S.; Siravegna, G.; Lallo, A.; Hobor, S.; Russo, M.; Buscarino, M.; Lazzari, L.; Sartore-Bianchi, A.; et al. Blockade of EGFR and MEK intercepts heterogeneous mechanisms of acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 224ra226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ryan, M.B.; Fece de la Cruz, F.; Phat, S.; Myers, D.T.; Wong, E.; Shahzade, H.A.; Hong, C.B.; Corcoran, R.B. Vertical Pathway Inhibition Overcomes Adaptive Feedback Resistance to KRAS(G12C) Inhibition. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 1633–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Xue, J.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Aronowitz, J.; Mai, T.T.; Vides, A.; Qeriqi, B.; Kim, D.; Li, C.; de Stanchina, E.; Mazutis, L.; et al. Rapid non-uniform adaptation to conformation-specific KRAS(G12C) inhibition. Nature 2020, 577, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zhang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, P.; Jiao, B.; Wang, Z.; Ren, R. Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) Inhibition Synergizes with KRAS G12C Inhibitors in Treating Cancer through the Regulation of the FAK-YAP Signaling. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, e2100250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Adachi, Y.; Ito, K.; Hayashi, Y.; Kimura, R.; Tan, T.Z.; Yamaguchi, R.; Ebi, H. Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition is a Cause of Both Intrinsic and Acquired Resistance to KRAS G12C Inhibitor in KRAS G12C-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 5962–5973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hallin, J.; Engstrom, L.D.; Hargis, L.; Calinisan, A.; Aranda, R.; Briere, D.M.; Sudhakar, N.; Bowcut, V.; Baer, B.R.; Ballard, J.A.; et al. The KRAS(G12C) Inhibitor MRTX849 Provides Insight toward Therapeutic Susceptibility of KRAS-Mutant Cancers in Mouse Models and Patients. Cancer Discov. 2020, 10, 54–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Suzuki, S.; Yonesaka, K.; Teramura, T.; Takehara, T.; Kato, R.; Sakai, H.; Haratani, K.; Tanizaki, J.; Kawakami, H.; Hayashi, H.; et al. KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in MET-Amplified KRAS (G12C) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Induced By RAS- and Non-RAS-Mediated Cell Signaling Mechanisms. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 27, 5697–5707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ho, C.S.L.; Tüns, A.I.; Schildhaus, H.U.; Wiesweg, M.; Grüner, B.M.; Hegedus, B.; Schuler, M.; Schramm, A.; Oeck, S. HER2 mediates clinical resistance to the KRAS(G12C) inhibitor sotorasib, which is overcome by co-targeting SHP2. Eur. J. Cancer 2021, 159, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Xu, L.; Zhu, S.; Lan, Y.; Yan, M.; Jiang, Z.; Zhu, J.; Liao, G.; Ping, Y.; Xu, J.; Pang, B.; et al. Revealing the contribution of somatic gene mutations to shaping tumor immune microenvironment. Brief. Bioinform. 2022, 23, bbac064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Liu, C.; Zheng, S.; Wang, Z.; Wang, S.; Wang, X.; Yang, L.; Xu, H.; Cao, Z.; Feng, X.; Xue, Q.; et al. KRAS-G12D mutation drives immune suppression and the primary resistance of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Commun. 2022, 42, 828–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Skoulidis, F.; Goldberg, M.E.; Greenawalt, D.M.; Hellmann, M.D.; Awad, M.M.; Gainor, J.F.; Schrock, A.B.; Hartmaier, R.J.; Trabucco, S.E.; Gay, L.; et al. STK11/LKB1 Mutations and PD-1 Inhibitor Resistance in KRAS-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 822–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Yang, L.; Shen, C.; Estrada-Bernal, A.; Robb, R.; Chatterjee, M.; Sebastian, N.; Webb, A.; Mo, X.; Chen, W.; Krishnan, S.; et al. Oncogenic KRAS drives radioresistance through upregulation of NRF2-53BP1-mediated non-homologous end-joining repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, 11067–11082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zhang, X.; Mao, T.; Xu, H.; Li, S.; Yue, M.; Ma, J.; Yao, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ge, W.; et al. Synergistic blocking of RAS downstream signaling and epigenetic pathway in KRAS mutant pancreatic cancer. Aging 2022, 14, 3597–3606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. McDonald, P.C.; Chafe, S.C.; Brown, W.S.; Saberi, S.; Swayampakula, M.; Venkateswaran, G.; Nemirovsky, O.; Gillespie, J.A.; Karasinska, J.M.; Kalloger, S.E.; et al. Regulation of pH by Carbonic Anhydrase 9 Mediates Survival of Pancreatic Cancer Cells with Activated KRAS in Response to Hypoxia. Gastroenterology 2019, 157, 823–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Kim, S.; Kim, N.; Kang, K.; Kim, W.; Won, J.; Cho, J. Whole Transcriptome Analysis Identifies TNS4 as a Key Effector of Cetuximab and a Regulator of the Oncogenic Activity of KRAS Mutant Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines. Cells 2019, 8, 878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Shin, D.H.; Kim, S.H.; Choi, M.; Bae, Y.K.; Han, C.; Choi, B.K.; Kim, S.S.; Han, J.Y. Oncogenic KRAS promotes growth of lung cancer cells expressing SLC3A2-NRG1 fusion via ADAM17-mediated shedding of NRG1. Oncogene 2022, 41, 280–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Yu, X.; Liu, J.; Qiu, H.; Hao, H.; Zhu, J.; Peng, S. Combined inhibition of ACK1 and AKT shows potential toward targeted therapy against KRAS-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2021, 21, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Rangel, D.F.; Dubeau, L.; Park, R.; Chan, P.; Ha, D.P.; Pulido, M.A.; Mullen, D.J.; Vorobyova, I.; Zhou, B.; Borok, Z.; et al. Endoplasmic reticulum chaperone GRP78/BiP is critical for mutant Kras-driven lung tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2021, 40, 3624–3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sun, S.; Hu, Z.; Huang, S.; Ye, X.; Wang, J.; Chang, J.; Wu, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Hu, X.; et al. REG4 is an indicator for KRAS mutant lung adenocarcinoma with TTF-1 low expression. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 145, 2273–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Lee, H.; Cai, F.; Kelekar, N.; Velupally, N.K.; Kim, J. Targeting PGM3 as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy in KRAS/LKB1 Co-Mutant Lung Cancer. Cells 2022, 11, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Chang, W.H.; Nguyen, T.T.; Hsu, C.H.; Bryant, K.L.; Kim, H.J.; Ying, H.; Erickson, J.W.; Der, C.J.; Cerione, R.A.; Antonyak, M.A. KRAS-dependent cancer cells promote survival by producing exosomes enriched in Survivin. Cancer Lett. 2021, 517, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Miyamoto, Y.; Akiyama, T.; Kato, R.; Sawayama, H.; Ogawa, K.; Yoshida, N.; Baba, H. Prognostic Significance of Systemic Inflammation Indices by KRAS Status in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Dis. Colon Rectum 2022. Available online: https://journals.lww.com/dcrjournal/Abstract/9000/Prognostic_Significance_of_Systemic_Inflammation.99157.aspx (accessed on 21 February 2022). [CrossRef]
  134. Lou, E.; Xiu, J.; Baca, Y.; Nelson, A.C.; Weinberg, B.A.; Beg, M.S.; Salem, M.E.; Lenz, H.J.; Philip, P.; El-Deiry, W.S.; et al. Expression of Immuno-Oncologic Biomarkers Is Enriched in Colorectal Cancers and Other Solid Tumors Harboring the A59T Variant of KRAS. Cells 2021, 10, 1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Gao, Z.; Chen, J.F.; Li, X.G.; Shi, Y.H.; Tang, Z.; Liu, W.R.; Zhang, X.; Huang, A.; Luo, X.M.; Gao, Q.; et al. KRAS acting through ERK signaling stabilizes PD-L1 via inhibiting autophagy pathway in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2022, 22, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wang, X.; Luo, X.; Tian, Y.; Wu, T.; Weng, J.; Li, Z.; Ye, F.; Huang, X. Equipping Natural Killer Cells with Cetuximab through Metabolic Glycoengineering and Bioorthogonal Reaction for Targeted Treatment of KRAS Mutant Colorectal Cancer. ACS Chem. Biol. 2021, 16, 724–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Pan, L.N.; Ma, Y.F.; Li, Z.; Hu, J.A.; Xu, Z.H. KRAS G12V mutation upregulates PD-L1 expression via TGF-β/EMT signaling pathway in human non-small-cell lung cancer. Cell Biol. Int. 2021, 45, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Peng, D.H.; Rodriguez, B.L.; Diao, L.; Gaudreau, P.O.; Padhye, A.; Konen, J.M.; Ochieng, J.K.; Class, C.A.; Fradette, J.J.; Gibson, L.; et al. Th17 cells contribute to combination MEK inhibitor and anti-PD-L1 therapy resistance in KRAS/p53 mutant lung cancers. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Qu, X.; Bie, F.; Wang, Y.; Du, J. TRIM58 is a prognostic biomarker remodeling the tumor microenvironment in KRAS-driven lung adenocarcinoma. Future Oncol. 2021, 17, 565–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Gao, G.; Liao, W.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, B.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y. KRAS G12D mutation predicts lower TMB and drives immune suppression in lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 2020, 149, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Dillard, P.; Casey, N.; Pollmann, S.; Vernhoff, P.; Gaudernack, G.; Kvalheim, G.; Wälchli, S.; Inderberg, E.M. Targeting KRAS mutations with HLA class II-restricted TCRs for the treatment of solid tumors. Oncoimmunology 2021, 10, 1936757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Glorieux, C.; Xia, X.; He, Y.Q.; Hu, Y.; Cremer, K.; Robert, A.; Liu, J.; Wang, F.; Ling, J.; Chiao, P.J.; et al. Regulation of PD-L1 expression in K-ras-driven cancers through ROS-mediated FGFR1 signaling. Redox Biol. 2021, 38, 101780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 12 00709 g001 550
Figure 1. Signaling Pathways Related to KRAS Mutations, and Potential Treatment Strategies. * KRAS switches between a guanosine diphosphate (GDP)-bound inactive state and a guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-bound active state. Normally, KRAS is bound to GDP and remains inactive. Activation through receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) leads to the activation of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) family, which subsequently triggers the exchange between GDP and GTP. GTP-bound active KRAS transduces downstream signals, including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, which are responsible for cell proliferation, cell cycle regulation, cell survival, and cell differentiation. The treatment approaches of KRAS mutant patients include therapies targeting KRAS, and factors involved in the KRAS mutation pathways, such as RTKs, SHP2, PI3K pathway elements, MAPK pathway elements, and CDK4/6. ICIs are also included, considering the potential effect on KRAS mutant patients. This figure was created using Figdraw.
Figure 1. Signaling Pathways Related to KRAS Mutations, and Potential Treatment Strategies. * KRAS switches between a guanosine diphosphate (GDP)-bound inactive state and a guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-bound active state. Normally, KRAS is bound to GDP and remains inactive. Activation through receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) leads to the activation of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) family, which subsequently triggers the exchange between GDP and GTP. GTP-bound active KRAS transduces downstream signals, including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, which are responsible for cell proliferation, cell cycle regulation, cell survival, and cell differentiation. The treatment approaches of KRAS mutant patients include therapies targeting KRAS, and factors involved in the KRAS mutation pathways, such as RTKs, SHP2, PI3K pathway elements, MAPK pathway elements, and CDK4/6. ICIs are also included, considering the potential effect on KRAS mutant patients. This figure was created using Figdraw.
Jcm 12 00709 g001
Table
Table 1. KRAS mutation rate and subtype proportion in common cancers.
Table 1. KRAS mutation rate and subtype proportion in common cancers.
Cancer TypeKRAS Mutation
N of SamplesRate (%)Top 3 Subtypes
(Proportion of All KRAS Mutations, %)
Pan-cancer87,60611.60G12D (29.19)G12V (22.97)G12C (13.43)
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma99081.72G12D (40.20)G12V (31.96)G12R (17.10)
Colorectal carcinoma385337.97G12D (28.04)G12V (18.50)G13D (18.10)
Non-small cell lung cancer458421.20G12C (45.42)G12V (15.78)G12D (13.03)
Data acquired from cBioPortal.org. G12: codon 12 encoding glycine; G13: codon 13 encoding glycine.
Table
Table 2. Clinical Trials of KRAS G12C-Targeted Therapy on KRAS Mutant Tumors.
Table 2. Clinical Trials of KRAS G12C-Targeted Therapy on KRAS Mutant Tumors.
Drug NameTreatment StrategyStagePatient CharacteristicsNumber of PatientsInitiation YearNCT Number
Sotorasib
(AMG 510)		MonotherapyPhase 2Advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations1162021NCT04625647
MonotherapyPhase 1–2Advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations7932018NCT03600883
MonotherapyPhase 2Stage IV NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations without prior treatment1702022NCT04933695
MonotherapyPhase 2Stage Ib-IIIA resectable NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations252022NCT05400577
MonotherapyPhase 2Stage III unresectable NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations432022NCT05398094
MonotherapyPhase 1Advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations122020NCT04380753
MonotherapyPhase 2Stage III unresectable NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations432022NCT05398094
Monotherapy (VS Docetaxel)Phase 3Advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations3452020NCT04303780
Combined with Tarloxotinib (pan-ERBB inhibitor)Phase 1–2Advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations302022NCT05313009
Combined with BBP-398 (SHP2 inhibitor)Phase 1Advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations852022NCT05480865
Combined with VS-6766 (RAF/MEK inhibitor)Phase 1–2Advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations532022NCT05074810
Combined with targeted therapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapyPhase 1–2Advanced Solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations10542019NCT04185883
Combined targeted therapy, chemotherapy, or
immunotherapy		Phase 1–2Advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations10542019NCT04185883
Combined with Panitumumab (anti-EGFR mAb) vs. Trifluridine and Tipiracil (chemotherapy) + Regorafenib (multi-kinase inhibitor *)Phase 3Advanced CRC with KRAS G12C mutations1532022NCT05198934
Combined with MVASI (antiangiogenic drug)Phase 1–2Advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations and Brain metastasis432022NCT05180422
Combined with Cisplatin or Carboplatin and Pemetrexed (chemotherapy)Phase 2Stage IIA-IIIB resectable non-squamous NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations272022NCT05118854
Adagrasib
(MRTX849)		MRTX monotherapy or combined with Pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 ICI)/Cetuximab (anti-EGFR IgG1 mAb)/Afatinib (EGFR TKI)Phase 1–2Advanced or metastatic cancer with KRAS G12C mutations7402019NCT03785249
MonotherapyPhase 2Advanced or metastatic NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations1162022NCT03785249
MRTX849 monotherapy or combined with Pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 ICI)Phase 2Advanced or metastatic NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations2502020NCT04613596
Monotherapy vs. Docetaxel (chemotherapy)Phase 3Advanced or metastatic NSCLC3402021NCT04685135
MRTX849 combined with Cetuximab (anti- EGFR IgG1 mAb) vs. mFOLFOX6 and FOLFIRI (chemotherapy)Phase 3Advanced CRC with KRAS G12C mutations4202021NCT04793958
Combined with VS-6766 (RAF-MEK inhibitor)Phase 1–2Advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations852022NCT05375994
JAB-21822MonotherapyPhase 1–2Advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations1442021NCT05009329
Monotherapy or combined with Cetuximab (anti-EGFR IgG1 mAb)Phase 1–2Advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations1002021NCT05002270
Combined with Cetuximab (anti-EGFR IgG1 mAb)Phase 1–2Advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations622022NCT05194995
Combined with JAB-3312 (SHP2 inhibitor)Phase 1–2Advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations1242022NCT05288205
JDQ443MonotherapyPhase 3Advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations3602022NCT05132075
Monotherapy or combined with TNO155 (SHP2 inhibitor) or tislelizumab (anti-PD-1 ICI) or TNO155 + tislelizumabPhase 1–2Advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations4252021NCT04699188
D3S-001MonotherapyPhase 1Advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations982022NCT05410145
GFH925MonotherapyPhase 1–2Advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations1282021NCT05005234
YL-15293MonotherapyPhase 1–2Advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations552021NCT05119933
JNJ-74699157MonotherapyPhase 1Advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations102019NCT04006301
GDC-6036Monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, etc.Phase 1Advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations4982020NCT04449874
LY3537982Monotherapy or combined with targeted therapy, immunotherapy, etc.Phase 1Advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutations3602021NCT04956640
RMC-6236Monotherapy (KRAS G12X inhibitor)Phase 1Advanced solid tumors with KRAS mutations1412022NCT05379985
* NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; CRC: colorectal cancer; SHP2: Src homology2 (SH2) domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTPase); EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; MEK: mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase; IgG1: immunoglobulin G1; mAb: monoclonal antibody; ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitor; TKI: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
Table
Table 3. Clinical Trials of Non-KRAS-Targeted Therapies on KRAS Mutant Tumors.
Table 3. Clinical Trials of Non-KRAS-Targeted Therapies on KRAS Mutant Tumors.
Drug DefinitionDrug NameTreatment StrategyStagePatient CharacteristicsNumber of PatientsInitiation YearNCT Number
MEK inhibitorsBI 3011441MonotherapyPhase 1Advanced, unresectable or metastatic refractory solid tumors with NRAS/KRAS mutations152021NCT04742556
LNP3794MonotherapyPhase 1Advanced or metastatic refractory solid tumors with NRAS/KRAS mutations152020NCT05187858
RO5126766MonotherapyPhase 1Advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutations152018NCT03681483
TrametinibCombined with Pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 ICI)Phase 1Stage IV NSCLC with KRAS mutations152018NCT03299088
Ponatinib; TrametinibCombined with Ponatinib (BCR-ABL TKI)Phase 1–2Advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutations122018NCT03704688
TPX-0005; TrametinibCombined with TPX-0005 (ROS1/TRK/ALK inhibitor)Phase 1–2Advanced or metastatic solid tumors with KRAS mutations742021NCT05071183
Trametinib; AnlotinibCombined with Anlotinib (antiangiogenic drug)Phase 1Advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutations302021NCT04967079
Trametinib; HydroxychloroquineCombined with Hydroxychloroquine (chemotherapy)Phase 2Refractory BTC with KRAS mutations302022NCT04566133
MEK inhibitorsBinimetinib; HydroxychloroquineCombined with Hydroxychloroquine (chemotherapy)Phase 1Advanced PDAC with KRAS mutations392019NCT04132505
Binimetinib; HydroxychloroquineCombined with Hydroxychloroquine (chemotherapy)Phase 2Advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutations292021NCT04735068
Binimetinib; HydroxychloroquineCombined with Hydroxychloroquine (chemotherapy)Phase 2Advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutations292021NCT04735068
Binimetinib; FutibatinibCombined with Futibatinib (FGFR 1–4 inhibitor)Phase 1–2Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors with KRAS mutations362021NCT04965818
Binimetinib; Pemetrexed and CisplatinCombined with Pemetrexed and Cisplatin (chemotherapy)Phase 1Advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutations182017NCT02964689
Binimetinib; Palbociclib; Trifluridine and Tipiracil HydrochlorideBinimetinib + Palbociclib (CDK4/6 Inhibitor) vs. Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride (chemotherapy)Phase 2Advanced CRC with KRAS or NRAS mutations1012019NCT03981614
Binimetinib; PalbociclibCombined with Palbociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor)Phase 1–2Advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutations722017NCT03170206
Cobimetinib; Hydroxychloroquine; AtezolizumabCombined with Hydroxychloroquine (chemotherapy) and Atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1 ICI)Phase 1–2Advanced solid tumors with KRAS mutations1752020NCT04214418
MEK inhibitorsVS-6766; DefactinibMonotherapy vs, combination therapy of VS-6766 and Defactinib (FAK inhibitor)Phase 2Recurrent NSCLC with KRAS and BRAF mutations1002020NCT04620330
SHP2 inhibitorsHBI-2376MonotherapyPhase 1Advanced malignant solid tumors with KRAS or EGFR mutations422021NCT05163028
RMC-4630; LY3214996Combined with LY3214996 (ERK1/2 inhibitor)Phase 1Metastatic solid tumors with KRAS mutations552022NCT04916236
BBP-398 with nivolumabCombined with nivolumab (anti-PD-1 ICI)Phase 1Advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutations452022NCT05375084
Multi-targeting kinase inhibitorRegorafenib; MethotrexateCombined with Methotrexate (chemotherapy)Phase 2Recurrent or metastatic NSCLC with KRAS mutations182018NCT03520842
PLK1 inhibitorsOnvansertib; Bevacizumab; FOLFIRICombined with Bevacizumab (antiangiogenic drug) and (FOLFIRI: chemotherapy)Phase 1–2Metastatic CRC with KRAS mutations1002019NCT03829410
Rigosertib; NivolumabCombined with Nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody)Phase 1–2Stage IV NSCLC with KRAS mutations202020NCT04263090
NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; CRC: colorectal cancer; BTC: biliary tract cancer; PDAC: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; MEK: mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase; TRK: tropomyosin receptor kinase; ALK: anaplastic lymphoma kinase; FGFR: fibroblasts growth factor receptor; FAK: focal adhesion kinase; ERK: extracellular regulated protein kinases; CDK4/6: cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6; ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitor; TKI: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
Table
Table 4. Clinical Trials of Other Unconventional Therapies on KRAS Mutant Tumors.
Table 4. Clinical Trials of Other Unconventional Therapies on KRAS Mutant Tumors.
Drug NameDrug DefinitionTreatment StrategyStagePatient CharacteristicsNumber of PatientsInitiation YearNCT Number
TVB-2640Fatty acid synthase (FASN) inhibitorMonotherapyPhase 2Metastatic or advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutations122019NCT03808558
ELI-002KRAS therapeutic vaccineMonotherapyPhase 1Solid tumors with KRAS mutations182021NCT04853017
REOLYSINReovirusCombined with FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab (chemotherapy and antiangiogenic drug)Phase 1Metastatic CRC with KRAS mutations362010NCT01274624
Mutant KRAS G12V-specific TCR transduced autologous T cellsMutant KRAS G12V-specific TCR transduced autologous T cellsChemotherapy prior to combination therapy of Mutant KRAS G12V-specific TCR transduced autologous T cells and Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodyPhase 1–2Advanced PDAC with KRAS G12V mutations302021NCT04146298
NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; CRC: colorectal cancer; PDAC: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; FASN: fatty acid synthase; TCR: T-cell receptors.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Huang, S.; Chu, Q. KRAS Mutations in Solid Tumors: Characteristics, Current Therapeutic Strategy, and Potential Treatment Exploration. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020709

AMA Style

Yang Y, Zhang H, Huang S, Chu Q. KRAS Mutations in Solid Tumors: Characteristics, Current Therapeutic Strategy, and Potential Treatment Exploration. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(2):709. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020709

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Yunkai, Huan Zhang, Shanshan Huang, and Qian Chu. 2023. "KRAS Mutations in Solid Tumors: Characteristics, Current Therapeutic Strategy, and Potential Treatment Exploration" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 2: 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020709

APA Style

Yang, Y., Zhang, H., Huang, S., & Chu, Q. (2023). KRAS Mutations in Solid Tumors: Characteristics, Current Therapeutic Strategy, and Potential Treatment Exploration. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(2), 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020709

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop