Next Article in Journal
Potential Involvement of Oxidative Stress in Ligamentum Flavum Hypertrophy
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of the Tibial Tunnel Angle and Posterior Tibial Slope on “Killer Turn” during Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Transperineal Laser Ablation of the Prostate (TPLA) for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction

J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(3), 793; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12030793
by Francesco Sessa 1,2,*,†, Paolo Polverino 1,†, Giampaolo Siena 3, Claudio Bisegna 1, Mattia Lo Re 1, Pietro Spatafora 1, Alessio Pecoraro 1, Anna Rivetti 1, Luisa Moscardi 1, Marco Saladino 1, Andrea Cocci 2,3, Mauro Gacci 1, Vincenzo Li Marzi 1, Marco Carini 3, Andrea Minervini 2,3, Riccardo Campi 1,2,‡ and Sergio Serni 1,2,‡
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(3), 793; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12030793
Submission received: 10 December 2022 / Revised: 12 January 2023 / Accepted: 16 January 2023 / Published: 19 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It's a well written review on currently available minimal invasive TPLA for BPO data, which is an interesting upcoming technique.

In order to improve the manuscript it is advised:

- to write a systematic review to create a more scientifically robust review. This would improve search strategy yield (for example use of Embase and include conference article data of current trials), structured outcome analysis, heterogeneity and risk of bias analysis.

- to include other laser systems performing transperineal laser ablation for BPO. 

- to create a graphical illustration of most important outcomes, such as IPSS, IIEF, uroflowmetry; for readability. 

- to perform English spell check. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have done a comprehensive review regarding TPLA. I have went through their manuscript with interest, without finding any readability issues  

Despite the fact that this is an interesting article, its methodology is weak. I would restructure it as a systematic review, adding a flow chart and other things that are missing in its current form.

Although an interesting article, it doesn't add anything to current literature around TPLA. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

An improved manuscript.

Back to TopTop