Comparative Analysis of High-Frequency and Low-Frequency Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation of the Right Median Nerve in the Regression of Clinical and Neurophysiological Manifestations of Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Population
- European;
- adult men and women from 25 to 60 years old;
- history of at least 3 symptoms of GAD: apprehension, motor tension, and autonomic overactivity;
- GAD older than 6 months but less than 3 years;
- the severity of GAD by GAD-7 is mild and moderate (5–14 points);
- non-smokers;
- passed ineffective pharmacotherapy or treatment was canceled due to side effects of the drugs at least 3 months before the start of the study;
- signed voluntary informed consent to participate in this study.
- epilepsy and uncontrolled seizure disorder;
- severe cognitive disorders;
- damage to the median nerve anywhere along its path from the brachial plexus to the carpal canal;
- pregnancy;
- history of stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, edema of upper extremity;
- history of cardiac arrhythmias or hemodynamic instability;
- cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electronic system;
- history of obsessive-compulsive disorder;
- patients without stable housing (locator person);
- out of work and experiencing significant financial difficulties;
- shift and night shift jobs;
- alcohol and drug use disorder;
- late-night gaming;
- frequent consumption of coffee and caffeinated drinks;
- taking tranquilizers and sedative and psychotropic drugs during treatment;
- undergoing physiotherapy or acupuncture treatment.
2.2. Sample Size Calculation
2.3. Clinical Examination
2.3.1. Neurological Examination
2.3.2. Psychiatric Examination
2.4. Anxiety Assessment Tools
2.4.1. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7)
2.4.2. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
2.4.3. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire
2.5. Electroencephalography
- Power spectrum density (PSD). PSD is a frequency spectrum, which is calculated using a discrete Fourier transform as the mean squared amplitude of each frequency component [51].
- EEG coherence between occipital and frontal FO regions. EEG coherence is a promising approach for assessing functional cortical connections between different cortical regions. The higher the coherence, the higher the linear synchrony, indicating strong functional connectivity and synergism between different brain regions [52].
2.6. Transcutaneous Electroneurostimulation
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Result
3.1. Clinical Examination
3.1.1. Clinical Symptoms of GAD
- Before treatment, self-reported symptoms were irritability, fatigue, and restlessness as the most severe, with an average of 7.33 ± 0.1, 6.56 ± 0.2, and 6.33 ± 0.2, respectively. Difficulty concentrating, muscle tension, and sleep disturbances had a moderate character and averaged 4.67 ± 0.3 points. Results of the study before and after treatment are demonstrated in Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5. The mean of each symptom did not differ significantly between groups.
- After daily TENS, In the control group, no significant changes in GAD symptoms were recorded after sham stimulation (t = 0.60, p = 0.55). On the other hand, GAD symptoms decreased to 34% (t = 4.10, p = 0.0001) after HF-TENS and to 45% (t = 6.60, p = 0.0001) after LF-TENS. Thus, the reduction in GAD symptoms was greater after LF-TENS than HF-TENS by 31.5% (t = 2.30, p = 0.024).
- After weekly TENS, after sham stimulation, no changes were detected in all studied symptoms. Continuation of weekly TENS treatment did not improve the results of daily TENS but maintained the same level of improvement over 6 months (p > 0.05).
- Follow-up period without weekly TENS, during the first 2 months, GAD symptom scores were not significantly different from those obtained after daily TENS treatment. At the end of the 6-month observation period, the severity of GAD symptoms gradually increased and was greater than after daily TENS in the HF-TENS subgroup by 39.2% (t = 2.86, p = 0.005) and in the LF-TENS subgroup by 68% (t = 3.40, p = 0.001) and less than the initial values before treatment by 27.6% (t = 3.20, p = 0.002) in the LF-TENS subgroup. However, the small residual reduction in GAD symptoms in the HF-TENS group compared with baseline levels (10.9%) was not significant (t = 1.24, p = 0.21). The results after sham TENS were the same as before treatment.
3.1.2. Hyperreflexia
- Before treatment (Figure 6), in all groups, hyperreflexia averaged 1.30 ± 0.05 and did not differ significantly between the study groups (p 0 > 0.05).
- After daily TENS, a decrease in hyperreflexia was observed only in patients after treatment with TENS and was not observed after sham stimulation. The reduction in hyperreflexia after HF-TENS averaged 39.3% (t = 4.06, p = 0.0002) and after LF-TENS—65.4% (t = 6.89, p = 0.0001). Comparative analysis between the two groups showed that hyperreflexia after LF-TENS was lower than after HF-TENS by 44.3% (t = 2.24, p = 0.029).
- After weekly TENS, in the subgroups continuing treatment with weekly TENS, the reduction in hyperreflexia remained without significant changes (p > 0.05).
- Follow-up period without weekly TENS, in subgroups where weekly TENS was not continued, hyperreflexia remained at the same level in the second month of follow-up as was achieved after daily TENS (p > 0.05). At 6 months, there was an increase in hyperreflexia, which decreased from pre-treatment baseline to 16.0% after HF-TENS (t = 1.66, p = 0.1) and 41.4% after LF-TENS (t = 4.40, p = 0.0001) and was superior to results after daily TENS by 39.2% (t = 2.57, p = 0.014) in the HF-TENS subgroup and by 68.5% (t = 2.57, p = 0.015) in the LF-TENS subgroup. In addition, after 6 months without treatment, hyperreflexia was lower in the LF-TENS subgroup compared to the HF-TENS subgroup by 31.8%.
3.2. Anxiety Assessment Tools
3.2.1. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Scale
- Before treatment: Anxiety severity by GAD-7 averaged 10.6 ± 0.18 points (Figure 7) with no significant differences between groups (p > 0.05).
- After daily treatment with sham TENS, a slight decrease in anxiety was noted, which did not exceed 15.1% (t = 3.20, p = 0.002). After effective TENS, the regression of anxiety was higher than in the control group by 21.1% (t = 3.20, p = 0.002) in the HF-TENS subgroup and by 45.6% (t = 3.20, p = 0.002) in LF-TENS subgroup. Additionally, the anxiolytic properties of LF-TENS were found to be more effective than HF-TENS by 59.8% (t = 5.50, p = 0.001).
- In patients continuing treatment with weekly TENS, there were no significant dynamics compared with the level of anxiety after daily treatment of TENS by sham TENS, HF-TENS, or LF-TENS (p > 0.05).
- The follow-up period of patients who did not undergo weekly TENS revealed that in the first 2 months, the severity of anxiety did not differ significantly from the values obtained after daily TENS in all groups. In subsequent months, a gradual increase in anxiety was noted, reaching a maximum at the end of the sixth month of observation. Compared to daily TENS results, there was an increase in the control group by 12% (t = 1.72, p = 0.09), in the HF-TENS subgroup by 32% (t = 4.60, p = 0.0001), and in the LF-TENS subgroup by 49% (t = 5.36, p = 0.001). However, the severity of anxiety was less than the initial values before treatment in the HF-TENS subgroup by 33% (t = 2.60, p = 0.01) and in the LF-TENS subgroup by 34% (t = 6.60, p = 0.0001) and did not differ in the control group (t = 0.86, p = 0.39). Thus, the anxiolytic effect of daily LF-TENS had a more sustained effect compared to HF-TENS by 1.6 times for at least 6 months.
3.2.2. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
- Before treatment, when studying anxiety disorders using the HAM-A method, it was revealed that the severity of GAD symptoms averaged 15.1 ± 0.3 points (Figure 8). No considerable differences were recorded between the mean values of the study groups (p > 0.05).
- After daily TENS treatment, the reduction in anxiety disorders using sham TENS, HF-TENS, and LF-TENS averaged 11.9% (t = 2.30, p = 0.023), 34.0% (t = 4.09, p = 0.0001), 48.3% (t = 7.04, p = 0.0001), respectively. Apparently, the anxiolytic effect of effective TENS was more pronounced than that of sham TENS, which reached 24.1% (t = 4.10, p = 0.0001) after HF-TENS and 41.4% (t = 2.30, p = 0.023) after LF-TENS. From the results obtained, it can be seen that the reduction in anxiety disorders after LF-TENS is 42.2% (t = 3,59, p = 0.0006) higher compared to HF-TENS.
- The results of continued treatment with weekly TENS showed that the anxiolytic effect obtained after daily TENS remained at the same level after using sham TENS and HF-TENS (p > 0.05) and significantly improved after using LF-TENS by 16.6% (t = 2.29, p = 0.024).
- Observation of patients who did not undergo weekly maintenance TENS revealed that the positive effect after daily TENS was maintained during the first 2 months. However, at the end of the follow-up period, scores obtained after daily therapy worsened by 32% (t = 4.20, p = 0.0001) after HF-TENS and by 41% (t = 5.62, p = 0.0001) after LF-TENS. Despite this, the severity of anxiety was lower than the initial values before treatment by 12.4% (t = 2.43, p = 0.02) after HF-TENS and by 27.2%(t = 5.66, p = 0.0001) after LF-TENS.
3.2.3. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire
- Quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction on average in all groups was 56.6 ± 0.62% without noticeable differences between them (Figure 9).
- After daily TENS, the improvement in quality of life increased by 14.6% (t = 3.27, p = 0.002) in the HF-TENS subgroup and by 37.9% (t = 3.27, p = 0.002) in the LF-TENS subgroup. No significant change was found in the control group. Thus, the quality of life after LF-TENS was 1.59 times (t = 11.6, p = 0.0001) higher than after HF-TENS (t = 3.27, p = 0.002).
- The quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction after a weekly TENS remained at the same level as after completing a course of daily TENS.
- Without continuing the course of weekly TENS, the quality of life of patients compared to the level before treatment was at the same level in the control group and exceeded this level by 6.0% (t = 2.29, p = 0.02) in the HF-TENS subgroup and by 26.9% (t = 10.7, p = 0.0001) in the LF-TENS subgroup.
3.3. Electroencephalography
3.3.1. Power Spectrum Density
- Before treatment, PSD analysis revealed significant changes in theta, alpha, beta I, and beta II rhythms in the frontal, central, parietal, temporal, and occipital regions. More significant changes were associated with a decrease in the PSD of the alpha rhythm in the occipital regions with an increase in the PSD of the beta I and beta II rhythms in the frontal, central, and temporal regions (Figure 10). The changes were individual in nature: from a moderate increase in the beta rhythm in the temporal, central, and frontal regions to hypersynchronization of the high-amplitude beta rhythm in all regions. However, the most frequent increases in beta I and beta II PSD were localized in the left hemisphere, with markedly greater amplitudes in the temporal regions (Figure 5).
- After daily TENS, no significant changes were detected in all groups, regardless of the treatment method.
- After weekly TENS, EEG showed a significant improvement in EEG characteristics with an increase in PSD for alpha rhythm in occipital regions by 24%(t = 2.09, p = 0.04) and a decrease in PSD for beta I rhythm in temporal and frontal regions by 28% (t = 2.14, p = 0.036) in patients after LF-TENS. EEG changes after HF-TENS and sham TENS were unremarkable.
- At the end of the follow-up period in patients who did not receive weekly TENS, PSD was not significantly different from other baseline EEG findings in all study groups.
3.3.2. EEG Coherence
- The values of cross-regional frontal coherence ranged from 0.3 to 0.7 with an average of 0.4 ± 0.01(normal range for adults 0.4–0.6). Meanwhile, coherence analysis showed that there were no statistical differences between the groups either before or after treatment. The determination of the cross-regional coherence coefficient between other regions was not meaningful due to the initial marked differences between groups.
- Before treatment, F-O interhemispheric coherence was significantly weak in all patients, ranging from 0.01 to 0.11, with a mean of 0.046 ± 0.01 in the left hemisphere and 0.051 in the right hemisphere (normal range for adults 0.14–0.16).
- After daily TENS, no significant influence on F-O interhemispheric coherence was found for sham TENS, HF-TENS, or LF-TENS (p > 0.05).
- Treatment continued for 6 months with weekly TENS did not significantly change the baseline coherence coefficient value in the sham TENS group or the HF-TENS subgroup. Only after LF-TENS, the relationship between the interhemispheric frontal and occipital regions was recorded with a significant increase in the coherence coefficient by 93% (t = 2.09, p = 0.040) in the left hemisphere and by 74.5% (t = 2.03, p = 0.046) in the right hemisphere (Figure 11).
4. Discussion
4.1. Severity of GAD before Treatment
4.2. Severity of GAD after Treatment by TENS
4.3. Pathogenesis of the Anxiolytic Effect of TENS
4.4. Efficiency of TENS in the Treatment of GAD
5. Conclusions
6. Declaration of Patient Consent
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Munir, S.; Takov, V. Generalized Anxiety Disorder; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Macdonald-Gagnon, G.; Stefanovics, E.A.; Potenza, M.N.; Pietrzak, R.H. Generalized anxiety and mild anxiety symptoms in U.S. military veterans: Prevalence, characteristics, and functioning. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2024, 171, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Crocq, M.A. The history of generalized anxiety disorder as a diagnostic category. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2017, 19, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Papadopoulou, M.; Papapostolou, A.; Bakola, E.; Masdrakis, V.G.; Moschovos, C.; Chroni, E.; Tsivgoulis, G.; Michopoulos, I. Neurophysiological and ultrasonographic comparative study of autonomous nervous system in patients suffering from fibromyalgia and generalized anxiety disorder. Neurol. Sci. 2022, 43, 2813–2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adibi, A.; Golitaleb, M.; Farrahi-Ashtiani, I.; Pirani, D.; Yousefi, K.; Jamshidbeigi, Y.; Sahebi, A. The Prevalence of Generalized Anxiety Disorder Among Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 31, 658846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Davies, M.N.; Verdi, S.; Burri, A.; Trzaskowski, M.; Lee, M.; Hettema, J.M.; Jansen, R.; Boomsma, D.I.; Spector, T.D. Generalised Anxiety Disorder—A Twin Study of Genetic Architecture, Genome-Wide Association and Differential Gene Expression. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0134865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, W.; Singh, S.S.; Calhoun, S.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, X.; Yang, F. Generalized anxiety disorder in urban China: Prevalence, awareness, and disease burden. J. Affect. Disord. 2018, 234, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Park, S.C.; Kim, Y.K. Anxiety Disorders in the DSM-5: Changes, Controversies, and Future Directions. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1191, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hettema, J.M.; Neale, M.C.; Kendler, K.S. A review and meta-analysis of the genetic epidemiology of anxiety disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 2001, 158, 1568–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Domschke, K.; Maron, E. Genetic factors in anxiety disorders. Mod Trends Pharmacopsychiatry 2013, 29, 24–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dunn, E.C.; Sofer, T.; Gallo, L.C.; Gogarten, S.M.; Kerr, K.F.; Chen, C.Y.; Stein, M.B.; Ursano, R.J.; Guo, X.; Jia, Y.; et al. Genome-wide association study of generalized anxiety symptoms in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2017, 174, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Otowa, T.; Hek, K.; Lee, M.; Byrne, E.M.; Mirza, S.S.; Nivard, M.G.; Bigdeli, T.; Aggen, S.H.; Adkins, D.; Wolen, A.; et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of anxiety disorders. Mol. Psychiatry 2016, 21, 1391–1399, Erratum in Mol. Psychiatry 2016, 21, 1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jetty, P.V.; Charney, D.S.; Goddard, A.W. Neurobiology of generalized anxiety disorder. Psychiatr. Clin. North. Am. 2001, 24, 75–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Ye, L.; Chen, W.; Huang, X.; Cui, Q.; He, Z.; Liu, D.; Chen, H. Altered Brain Signal Variability in Patients With Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Front. Psychiatry 2019, 10, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Knyazev, G.G.; Savostyanov, A.N.; Levin, E.A. Alpha oscillations as a correlate of trait anxiety. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2004, 53, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dzhebrailova, T.D.; Korobeinikova, I.I.; Karatygin, N.A.; Venerina, Y.A.; Yantikova, E.V. Coherence in the EEG Theta1 Range in the State of Relative Rest and during Testing of Attention in Subjects with Different Levels of Trait Anxiety. Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 2023, 53, 1190–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribas, V.R.; Ribas, R.G.; Nóbrega, J.A.; da Nóbrega, M.V.; Espécie, J.A.A.; Calafange, M.T.; Calafange, C.O.M.; Martins, H.A.L. Pattern of anxiety, insecurity, fear, panic and/or phobia observed by quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG). Dement. Neuropsychol. 2018, 12, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Newson, J.J.; Thiagarajan, T.C. EEG Frequency Bands in Psychiatric Disorders: A Review of Resting State Studies. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2019, 12, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Massullo, C.; Carbone, G.A.; Farina, B.; Panno, A.; Capriotti, C.; Giacchini, M.; Machado, S.; Budde, H.; Murillo-Rodríguez, E.; Imperatori, C. Dysregulated brain salience within a triple network model in high trait anxiety individuals: A pilot EEG functional connectivity study. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2020, 157, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qi, X.; Xu, W.; Li, G. Neuroimaging Study of Brain Functional Differences in Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Depressive Disorder. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Love, A.S.; Love, R. Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care Settings. Nurs. Clin. North. Am. 2019, 54, 473–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ansara, E.D. Management of treatment-resistant generalized anxiety disorder. Ment. Health Clin. 2020, 10, 326–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Strawn, J.R.; Geracioti, L.; Rajdev, N.; Clemenza, K.; Levine, A. Pharmacotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder in adult and pediatric patients: An evidence-based treatment review. Expert. Opin. Pharmacother. 2018, 19, 1057–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Ribeiro, C.; Tsang, L.; Lin, B.; Kemp-Smith, K.; Phillips, J.; Furness, J. Physiotherapists’ perceptions of their role in treating and managing people with depression and anxiety disorders: A systematic review. Physiother. Theory Pract. 2022, 40, 431–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martinsen, E.W. Physical activity in the prevention and treatment of anxiety and depression. Nord. J. Psychiatry 2008, 62, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Zamil, M.; Minenko, I.A.; Kulikova, N.G.; Mansur, N.; Nuvakhova, M.B.; Khripunova, O.V.; Shurygina, I.P.; Topolyanskaya, S.V.; Trefilova, V.V.; Petrova, M.M.; et al. Efficiency of Direct Transcutaneous Electroneurostimulation of the Median Nerve in the Regression of Residual Neurological Symptoms after Carpal Tunnel Decompression Surgery. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Zamil, M.; Minenko, I.A.; Kulikova, N.G.; Alade, M.; Petrova, M.M.; Pronina, E.A.; Romanova, I.V.; Narodova, E.A.; Nasyrova, R.F.; Shnayder, N.A. Clinical Experience of High Frequency and Low Frequency TENS in Treatment of Diabetic Neuropathic Pain in Russia. Healthcare 2022, 10, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Zamil, M.; Kulikova, N.G.; Minenko, I.A.; Mansur, N.; Zalozhnev, D.M.; Uzdenov, M.B.; Dzhanibekova, A.A.; Gochiyayev, A.A.; Shnayder, N.A. Functional Recovery and Regenerative Effects of Direct Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Treatment of Post-COVID-19 Guillain–Barré and Acute Transverse Myelitis Overlap Syndrome: A Clinical Case. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2024, 9, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al Zamil, M.K.; Kulikova, N.G. Efficiency of Acupuncture and Transcutaneous Electroneurostimulation in Treatment of Patients with Anxiety Disorders. Int. J. Pharmacogn. Chin. Med. 2021, 5, 000214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torres, W.E.; Fraser, N.P.; Baumgartner, B.R.; Nelson, R.C.; Evans, G.R.; Jones, V.; Peterson, J. The use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation during the biliary lithotripsy procedure. J. Stone Dis. 1992, 4, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Ferrara, J.; Stamey, W.; Strutt, A.M.; Adam, O.R.; Jankovic, J. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) for psychogenic movement disorders. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2011, 23, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vance, C.G.; Dailey, D.L.; Rakel, B.A.; Sluka, K.A. Using TENS for pain control: The state of the evidence. Pain. Manag. 2014, 4, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Sluka, K.A.; Bjordal, J.M.; Marchand, S.; Rakel, B.A. What makes transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation work? Making sense of the mixed results in the clinical literature. Phys. Ther. 2013, 93, 1397–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Sokolova, N.I.; Kulakov, V.I.; Malygina, S.I. Izmenenie soderzhaniia beta-éndorfina v krovi materi i ploda v usloviiakh primeneniia chreskozhnoĭ élektroneĭrostimuliatsii pri prezhdevremennykh rodakh [Changes in the content of beta-endorphin in maternal and fetal blood during transcutaneous electric neurostimulation in premature labor]. Anesteziol. Reanimatol. 1990, 6, 17–19. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Kuzin, M.I.; Avrutskiĭ, M.; Shliuznikov, B.M.; Lakhter, M.A.; Panchenko, L.F. Vliianie chreskozhnoĭ transtserebral’noĭ élektrostimuliatsii v rezhime élektroanestezii na soderzhanie beta-éndorfina v spinnomozgovoĭ zhidkosti i plazme krovi [Effect of transcutaneous transcerebral electrostimulation as electroanesthesia on the beta-endorphin content of the cerebrospinal fluid and blood plasma]. Biull Eksp. Biol. Med. 1984, 97, 515–516. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Aiyer, R.; Johnson, E.; Poli, J. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation. In Anesthesiology In-Training Exam Review; Banik, R.K., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switherland, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bi, Y.; Wei, Z.; Kong, Y.; Hu, L. Supraspinal neural mechanisms of the analgesic effect produced by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Brain Struct. Funct. 2021, 226, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tanaka, M.; Vécsei, L. From Lab to Life: Exploring Cutting-Edge Models for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, J.; Fang, J.; Wang, Z.; Rong, P.; Hong, Y.; Fan, Y.; Wang, X.; Park, J.; Jin, Y.; Liu, C.; et al. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation modulates amygdala functional connectivity in patients with depression. J. Affect. Disord. 2016, 205, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aranberri Ruiz, A. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation to Improve Emotional State. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peng, W.W.; Tang, Z.Y.; Zhang, F.R.; Li, H.; Kong, Y.Z.; Iannetti, G.D.; Hu, L. Neurobiological mechanisms of TENS-induced analgesia. Neuroimage 2019, 195, 396–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Keute, M.; Wienke, C.; Ruhnau, P.H.; Zaehle, T. Effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) on beta and gamma brain oscillations. Cortex 2021, 140, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bang, S.K.; Ryu, Y.; Chang, S.; Im, C.K.; Bae, J.H.; Gwak, Y.S.; Yang, C.H.; Kim, H.Y. Attenuation of hypertension by C-fiber stimulation of the human median nerve and the concept based novel device. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sulu, R.; Akbas, M.; Cetiner, S. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation applied at different frequencies during labor on hormone levels, labor pain perception, and anxiety: A randomized placebo-controlled single-blind clinical trial. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2022, 52, 102124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoshimoto, S.; Babygirija, R.; Dobner, A.; Ludwig, K.; Takahashi, T. Anti-stress effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on colonic motility in rats. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2012, 57, 1213–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pati, D.; Harden, S.; Sheng, W.; Kelly, K.; de Kloet, A.; Krause, E.; Frazier, C. Endogenous oxytocin inhibits hypothalamic corticotrophin-releasing hormone neurones following acute hypernatraemia. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2020, 32, e12839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Di Gregorio, F.; Battaglia, S. The intricate brain–body interaction in psychiatric and neurological diseases. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2024, 33, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- George, M.S.; Ward, H.E., Jr.; Ninan, P.T.; Pollack, M.; Nahas, Z.; Anderson, B.; Kose, S.; Howland, R.H.; Goodman, W.K.; Ballenger, J.C. A pilot study of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment-resistant anxiety disorders. Brain Stimul. 2008, 1, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Movahed, F.S.; Goradel, J.A.; Pouresmali, A.; Mowlaie, M. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on worry, anxiety, and depression in generalized anxiety disorder: A randomized, single-blind pharmacotherapy and sham-controlled clinical trial. Iran J. Psychiatry Behav. Sci. 2018, 12, e11071. [Google Scholar]
- Babiloni, C.; Vecchio, F.; Buffo, P.; Onorati, P.; Muratori, C.; Ferracuti, S.; Roma, P.; Battuello, M.; Donato, N.; Pellegrini, P.; et al. Cortical sources of resting-state EEG rhythms are abnormal in naïve HIV subjects. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012, 123, 2163–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chikhi, S.; Matton, N.; Blanchet, S. EEG power spectral measures of cognitive workload: A meta-analysis. Psychophysiology 2022, 59, e14009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McCabe, L.; Johnstone, S.J.; Watts, A.; Jiang, H.; Sun, L.; Zhang, D. EEG coherence during subjectively-rated psychological state variations. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2020, 158, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Penninx, B.W.; Pine, D.S.; Holmes, E.A.; Reif, A. Anxiety disorders. Lancet 2021, 6, 914–927, Erratum in Lancet 2021, 397, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Sher, L. Etiology and pathogenesis of anxiety disorders. Med. Hypotheses 2001, 57, 101–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Q.; Wang, C.; Deng, Q.; Zhan, L.; Tang, Y.; Li, H.; Antwi, C.O.; Xiang, A.; Lv, Y.; Jia, X.; et al. Alterations of regional spontaneous brain activities in anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2022, 296, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elsaid, S.; Rubin-Kahana, D.S.; Kloiber, S.; Kennedy, S.H.; Chavez, S.; Le Foll, B. Neurochemical Alterations in Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD): A Systematic Review of Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Brehl, A.-K.; Kohn, N.; Fernandez, G.; Schene, A.H. A mechanistic model for individualised treatment of anxiety disorders based on predictive neural biomarkers. Psychol. Med. 2020, 50, 727–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vismara, M.; Girone, N.; Cirnigliaro, G.; Fasciana, F.; Vanzetto, S.; Ferrara, L.; Priori, A.; D’Addario, C.; Viganò, C.; Dell’Osso, B. Peripheral Biomarkers in DSM-5 Anxiety Disorders: An Updated Overview. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grigorova, O.V.; Akhapkin, R.V.; Aleksandrovsky, Y.A. Sovremennye predstavleniia o patogeneticheskoĭ terapii trevozhnykh rasstroĭstv [Modern concepts of pathogenetic therapy of anxiety disorders]. Zhurnal Nevrol. Psikhiatrii Im. SS Korsakova 2019, 119, 111–120. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Savage, K.; Sarris, J.; Hughes, M.; Bousman, C.A.; Rossell, S.; Scholey, A.; Stough, C.; Suo, C. Neuroimaging Insights: Kava’s (Piper methysticum) Effect on Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex GABA in Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Nuss, P. Anxiety disorders and GABA neurotransmission: A disturbance of modulation. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2015, 11, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tasan, R.O.; Bukovac, A.; Peterschmitt, Y.N.; Sartori, S.B.; Landgraf, R.; Singewald, N.; Sperk, G. Altered GABA transmission in a mouse model of increased trait anxiety. Neuroscience 2011, 183, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sporn, S.; Hein, T.; Herrojo Ruiz, M. Alterations in the amplitude and burst rate of beta oscillations impair reward-dependent motor learning in anxiety. Elife 2020, 9, e50654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Wang, J.; Fang, J.; Xu, Y.; Zhong, H.; Li, J.; Li, H.; Li, G. Difference analysis of multidimensional electroencephalogram characteristics between young and old patients with generalized anxiety disorder. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 1074587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Li, G.; Huang, S.; Xu, W.; Jiao, W.; Jiang, Y.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, J. The impact of mental fatigue on brain activity: A comparative study both in resting state and task state using EEG. BMC Neurosci. 2020, 21, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pfurtscheller, G.; Da Silva, F.H.L. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1999, 110, 1842–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miskovic, V.; Ashbaugh, A.R.; Santesso, D.L.; Mccabe, R.E.; Antony, M.M.; Schmidt, L.A. Frontal brain oscillations and social anxiety: A cross-frequency spectral analysis during baseline and speech anticipation. Biol. Psychol. 2010, 83, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engel, A.K.; Fries, P.; Singer, W. Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 2, 704–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Z.; Li, G.; Fang, J.; Zhong, H.; Wang, J.; Sun, Y.; Shen, X. Aberrated Multidimensional EEG Characteristics in Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Machine-Learning Based Analysis Framework. Sensors 2022, 22, 5420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Maeda, Y.; Lisi, T.L.; Vance, C.G.; Sluka, K.A. Release of GABA and activation of GABA(A) in the spinal cord mediates the effects of TENS in rats. Brain Res. 2007, 1136, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Somers, D.L.; Clemente, F.R. Contralateral high or a combination of high- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces mechanical allodynia and alters dorsal horn neurotransmitter content in neuropathic rats. J. Pain. 2009, 10, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- DeSantana, J.M.; Walsh, D.M.; Vance, C.; Rakel, B.A.; Sluka, K.A. Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for treatment of hyperalgesia and pain. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2008, 10, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Colzato, L.; Beste, C. A literature review on the neurophysiological underpinnings and cognitive effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation: Challenges and future directions. J. Neurophysiol. 2020, 123, 1739–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Santos, C.M.; Francischi, J.N.; Lima-Paiva, P.; Sluka, K.A.; Resende, M.A. Effect of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on nociception and edema induced by peripheral serotonin. Int. J. Neurosci. 2013, 123, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peng, L.; Mu, K.; Liu, A.; Zhou, L.; Gao, Y.; Shenoy, I.T.; Mei, Z.; Chen, Q. Transauricular vagus nerve stimulation at auricular acupoints Kindey (CO10), Yidan (CO11), Liver (CO12) and Shenmen (TF4) can induce auditory and limbic cortices activation measured by fMRI. Hear. Res. 2018, 359, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kraus, T.; Hösl, K.; Kiess, O.; Schanze, A.; Kornhuber, J.; Forster, C. BOLD fMRI deactivation of limbic and temporal brain structures and mood enhancing effect by transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation. J. Neural Transm. 2007, 114, 1485–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Palmer, A.; Hamann, T.; Liese, J.; Müller, B.; Kropp, P.; Jürgens, T.P.; Rimmele, F. Efficacy of cranial electrotherapy stimulation in patients with burning mouth syndrome: A randomized, controlled, double-blind pilot study. Front. Neurol. 2024, 15, 1343093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Al-Zamil, M.K.H.; Kulikova, N.G. Direct Transcutaneous Electroneurostimulation of Median Nerve Leads to an Improvement of Bioelectrical Activity of the Brain in Patients with Insomnia. J. Clin. Sci. Trans. Med. 2020, 2, 000108. Available online: https://medwinpublishers.com/JCSTM/direct-transcutaneous-electroneurostimulation-of-median-nerve-leads-to-an-improvement-of-bioelectrical-activity-of-the-brain-in-patients-with-insomnia.pdf (accessed on 15 November 2022).
- Feng, B.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, L.Y.; Wu, J.Y.; Yang, S.J.; Zhang, N.; Tan, Q.R.; Wang, H.N.; Ge, N.; Ning, F.; et al. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder: Assessor-blinded, randomized controlled study. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2019, 73, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yeh, M.L.; Chung, Y.C.; Hsu, L.C.; Hung, S.H. Effect of Transcutaneous Acupoint Electrical Stimulation on Post-Hemorrhoidectomy-Associated Pain, Anxiety, and Heart Rate Variability: A Randomized-Controlled Study. Clin. Nurs. Res. 2018, 27, 450–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, X.; Chen, T.; Wang, K.; Wei, X.; Feng, J.; Zhou, J. Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical acupoints stimulation for preoperative anxiety in thoracoscopic surgery: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2023, 13, e067082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cebalo, N.; Negovetić Vranić, D.; Bašić Kes, V. The Effect of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Anxiety and Fear in Children Aged 9–14 Years. Acta Stomatol. Croat. 2020, 54, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Johnson, M.I.; Jones, G.; Paley, C.A.; Wittkopf, P.G. The clinical efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain: A protocol for a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). BMJ Open 2019, 9, e029999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiong, F.; Xu, R.; Li, T.; Wang, J.; Hu, Q.; Song, X.; Wang, G.; Su, H.; Jia, S.; Wang, S.; et al. Application of Biophysical Properties of Meridians in the Visualization of Pericardium Meridian. J. Acupunct. Meridian Stud. 2023, 30, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dai, Y.; Yin, N.; Yu, H.; Xu, G. Cerebral cortex functional networks of magnetic stimulation at acupoints along the pericardium meridian. J. Integr. Neurosci. 2019, 18, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, H.; Yin, N.; Wang, A.; Xu, G. Cerebral cortex Functional Networks of Transdermal Electrical Stimulation at Daling (PC7) Acupoint. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 2023, 54, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jadidi, A.F.; Jensen, W.; Zarei, A.A.; Lontis, R. Alteration in Cortical Activity and Perceived Sensation Following Modulated TENS. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2023, 31, 875–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zarei, A.A.; Jensen, W.; Faghani Jadidi, A.; Lontis, E.R.; Atashzar, S.F. Gamma-band enhancement of functional brain connectivity following transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. J. Neural Eng. 2022, 19, 026020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Faghani Jadidi, A.; Stevenson, A.J.T.; Zarei, A.A.; Jensen, W.; Lontis, R. Effect of Modulated TENS on Corticospinal Excitability in Healthy Subjects. Neuroscience 2022, 485, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Control Group | TENS Group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
HF-TENS Subgroup | LF-TENS Subgroup | p | ||
No | 40 | 40 | 41 | |
Age | 46.4 ± 1.18 | 45.8 ± 1.12 | 46.2 ± 0.98 | p > 0.05 |
Gender (female:male) | 22:18 | 21:19 | 20:21 | p > 0.05 |
Disease duration (months) | 18.2 ± 1.27 | 19.2 ± 1.37 | 18.6 ± 1.24 | p > 0.05 |
GAD-7 | 10.6 ± 0.33 | 10.7 ± 0.28 | 10.6 ± 0.32 | p > 0.05 |
HAM-A | 15.1 ± 0.51 | 15.3 ± 0.51 | 15.1 ± 0.53 | p > 0.05 |
Sham Stimulation | HF-TENS | LF-TENS | |
---|---|---|---|
Waveform | Monophasic square wave | Monophasic square wave | Monophasic square wave |
Frequency | 1 Hz | 50 Hz | 1 Hz |
Duration | 30 mcs | 50 mcs | 200 mcs |
Amplitude * | Minimal sensory response | Distinct painless sensory response | Distinct painless motor response |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Al-Zamil, M.; Kulikova, N.G.; Minenko, I.A.; Shurygina, I.P.; Petrova, M.M.; Mansur, N.; Kuliev, R.R.; Blinova, V.V.; Khripunova, O.V.; Shnayder, N.A. Comparative Analysis of High-Frequency and Low-Frequency Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation of the Right Median Nerve in the Regression of Clinical and Neurophysiological Manifestations of Generalized Anxiety Disorder. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3026. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113026
Al-Zamil M, Kulikova NG, Minenko IA, Shurygina IP, Petrova MM, Mansur N, Kuliev RR, Blinova VV, Khripunova OV, Shnayder NA. Comparative Analysis of High-Frequency and Low-Frequency Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation of the Right Median Nerve in the Regression of Clinical and Neurophysiological Manifestations of Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(11):3026. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113026
Chicago/Turabian StyleAl-Zamil, Mustafa, Natalia G. Kulikova, Inessa A. Minenko, Irina P. Shurygina, Marina M. Petrova, Numman Mansur, Rufat R. Kuliev, Vasilissa V. Blinova, Olga V. Khripunova, and Natalia A. Shnayder. 2024. "Comparative Analysis of High-Frequency and Low-Frequency Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation of the Right Median Nerve in the Regression of Clinical and Neurophysiological Manifestations of Generalized Anxiety Disorder" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 11: 3026. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113026
APA StyleAl-Zamil, M., Kulikova, N. G., Minenko, I. A., Shurygina, I. P., Petrova, M. M., Mansur, N., Kuliev, R. R., Blinova, V. V., Khripunova, O. V., & Shnayder, N. A. (2024). Comparative Analysis of High-Frequency and Low-Frequency Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation of the Right Median Nerve in the Regression of Clinical and Neurophysiological Manifestations of Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(11), 3026. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113026