Next Article in Journal
Myocardial Fibrosis in Young and Veteran Athletes: Evidence from a Systematic Review of the Current Literature
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantified Deltoid Muscle Stiffness Can Predict Improved Muscle Strength for Elevation Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
Previous Article in Journal
Physical Treatments and Therapies for Androgenetic Alopecia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cutting Periprosthetic Infection Rate: Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization as a Mandatory Procedure in Preoperative Knee and Hip Replacement Care—Insights from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of More Than 50,000 Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Etiology, Outcomes, and Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Younger Patients: A Nationwide Big Data Analysis

1
Carmel Medical Center, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 2611001, Israel
2
Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(15), 4535; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154535
Submission received: 28 June 2024 / Revised: 11 July 2024 / Accepted: 30 July 2024 / Published: 2 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Total Joint Arthroplasty: Management and Future Opportunities)

Abstract

:
Background: This study investigates the rising trend of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients under 55 years old, commonly referred to as “younger” THA patients. Traditionally a procedure for older adults with osteoarthritis, THA is increasingly performed on younger patients. Methods: Using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2019, we analyze the factors driving this trend, including the causes of hip issues, patient characteristics, and coexisting medical conditions. The study examines in-hospital mortality, length of stay, post-surgical complications, and hospitalization costs for 231,630 THA patients aged 18–54.9, identified using ICD-10 codes. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that younger patients (aged 18–34.9) had higher rates of chronic anemia, inflammatory bowel disease, sickle cell disorders, connective tissue disorders, and coagulation defects compared to patients aged 35–44.9 and 45–54.9. They also experienced the longest hospital stays (2.08 days) and highest costs ($70,540). Significant odds ratios were found for sickle cell disorders (36.078), coagulation defects (1.566), inflammatory bowel disease (2.582), connective tissue disorders (11.727), hip dislocation (3.447), and blood transfusion (1.488) in younger patients compared to other THA patients. Conclusions: Comprehensive analysis of these unique needs is crucial for optimizing care, tailoring treatment, managing co-existing conditions, and personalizing recovery strategies to improve outcomes and quality of life for younger THA patients.

1. Introduction

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become a well-established surgical intervention for relieving pain and improving joint function in patients with severe hip conditions, particularly osteoarthritis [1,2,3,4]. Traditionally, THA has been performed primarily on older adults due to the gradual progression of degenerative joint diseases. However, recent years have witnessed a growing trend of THA procedures in younger patients [5,6]. This shift in demographics presents a unique set of challenges and considerations for orthopedic surgeons and healthcare providers managing this patient population.
Performing THA in younger patients has historically been approached with caution. Factors such as implant durability, increased polyethylene wear due to higher activity levels, and longer life expectancy have led to concerns about aseptic loosening and revision surgeries [5,7,8]. Despite these concerns, improvements in surgical procedures and implant materials have made THA feasible for young patients. Consequently, there has been an upward trend in the number of procedures performed on this age group over the past few decades [5,6,9].
The impact of age on THA outcomes presents a complex picture. While earlier studies reported promising results for younger patients [7], more recent research suggests higher rates of revision surgery and complications in this population [9,10,11]. This discrepancy might be due to increased functional demands placed on the implants by younger, more active individuals, coupled with their longer lifespans, leading to greater wear and tear [4,11]. Additionally, variations in study designs and patient populations make it challenging to definitively assess the long-term success of THA in younger patients.
The economic burden of THA on healthcare systems is significant. In the United States alone, hip arthroplasty accounted for a substantial number of hospitalizations and surgeries [12,13,14], highlighting its prevalence and associated costs. Understanding early postoperative complications is crucial, especially with the projected surge in THA demand fueled by an aging population and rising joint disease prevalence [12,13,14].
There is a significant lack of research on the clinical outcomes and healthcare usage patterns of younger patients receiving THA [1,2,7,12,13,14]. Most existing studies focus on older populations, leaving a critical gap in data on perioperative outcomes for younger individuals. This absence of information hinders effective clinical decision-making and resource allocation.
To address this knowledge gap, our study utilizes a nationwide big data analysis of the NIS database. We aim to explore the reasons for surgery (etiology), patient characteristics, and prevalence of comorbid conditions in younger THA patients (under 55 years old). Additionally, we will analyze hospital stays and postoperative complications across different age groups. This comprehensive analysis seeks to enhance the understanding of THA in younger patients, ultimately leading to better treatment strategies and healthcare policies.

Research Questions

This study investigates the primary causes leading to THA in three younger age groups, examining the influence of demographics and clinical profiles on outcomes. It explores the prevalence and impact of comorbidities on postoperative complications and compares hospital stays, costs, and mortality rates across younger age subgroups. Additionally, it determines the odds ratios for various conditions and complications in younger patients compared to the overall THA population.

2. Methods

2.1. Data Source

The data were drawn from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), a part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) managed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Rockville, MD, USA). The NIS provides a representative 20% stratified sample of all inpatient discharges from US hospitals, amounting to approximately seven million unweighted hospital stays annually. This study analyzed data from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2019.

2.2. Study Population and Patient Variables

This study analyzed data for 231,630 adult patients (aged 18–54 years) who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). The patients were divided into three age groups: 18–34.9 years (n = 16,295), 35–44.9 years (n = 41,045), and 45–54.9 years (n = 174,290).
ICD-10 codes specific to THA procedures were used to identify patients. To ensure data accuracy, the study excluded patients admitted for emergency procedures, those with prior surgeries before admission, surgeries due to trauma, or surgeries related to oncology. A detailed list of ICD-10 codes for inclusion and exclusion is available in the Supplementary Materials.
Comorbidities were determined by reviewing each patient’s ICD-10 codes. Patients with hospital cost records of $0 were excluded. The study investigated the presence of the following comorbidities: hypertension, dyslipidemia, chronic anemia, osteoporosis, alcohol abuse, type 2 diabetes, renal disease, chronic heart failure (CHF), chronic lung disease, obesity, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), coagulation defects, connective tissue disorders, sickle cell disease, and gout.

2.3. Outcome Measures

The study assessed several key outcomes for THA patients: in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), complications, and total hospitalization costs. Established methods analyzed clinical outcomes. Specific ICD-10 codes identified complications like blood loss anemia, blood transfusion, and various other conditions. The postoperative period is defined as the time of the hospital stay.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis using SPSS software version 26 involved calculating frequencies and proportions of factors like demographics, clinical characteristics, and hospital stay details. These were then weighted to reflect national estimates. Pearson’s chi-square test compared categorical variables; ANOVAs assessed differences in continuous variables. A p-value less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

2.5. Ethical Considerations

The study was conducted under exempt status granted by the institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived due to the de-identified nature of the NIS dataset.

3. Results

We focus on three age groups (16,295 patients 18–34.9 years old, 41,045 patients 35–44.9 years old, and 174,290 patients 45–54.9 years old), underlying causes, patient demographics, and outcomes like hospitalization length and complications. The mean age at admission for each group was as follows: 27.92 years (SD 5.358) for the under-35 group, 40.47 years (SD 2.755) for the 35–44.9 group, and 50.55 years (SD 2.712) for the 45–54.9 group, with a total mean age of 47.17 years (SD 7.180) for all groups combined.

3.1. Proportion of THA Procedures across Age Groups

From 2016 to 2019, the percentage of THA procedures performed on patients aged 18–34.9 increased from 6.8% to 7.5%, as shown in Figure 1. In numbers, this represents a slight increase each year: 4003 patients in 2016, 4081 in 2017, 4069 in 2018, and 4145 in 2019. The proportion of THAs in patients aged 35–44.9 showed slight fluctuations from 16.8% to 18.4%. Patients aged 45–54.9 consistently represented the largest proportion, ranging from 74.1% to 76.1% (p < 0.0001).

3.2. Etiologies of THA by Age Group

Primary osteoarthritis was the major cause of THA across all age groups. It accounted for 56.15% of cases in patients aged 18–34.9, increasing significantly to 77.30% in those aged 35–44.9, and 91.32% in the 45–54.9 age group (p < 0.0001). Osteonecrosis was more common in younger patients (35.86%) compared to older groups (20.16% and 7.77%). The chi-square test indicated that the distribution of etiologies for THA differed significantly among the three age groups (p < 0.0001). Specifically, etiologies such as congenital deformities of the hip, Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, acquired leg deformity, arthropathic psoriasis, and systemic lupus erythematosus were found to have a significantly different distribution across age groups. These conditions were more prevalent in the younger age group (18–34.9) compared to the older age groups (35–44.9 and 45–54.9). This statistical significance indicates that the etiologies for THA vary significantly among the three age groups, rather than implying that each etiology is significantly more prevalent in the youngest group (Table 1).

3.3. Demographics and Clinical Characteristics

The study revealed significant differences in demographics and clinical characteristics across age groups. Younger THA patients (18–34.9 years) were more likely to have Medicaid coverage (28.0%) compared to older patients. Conversely, private insurance prevalence increased with age, covering 56.8% of the youngest group, 65.2% of the 35–44.9 age group, and reaching 71.0% in the oldest patients (45–54.9 years). Racial makeup also differed by age. The youngest group had a higher proportion of Black (18.7%) and Hispanic (11.1%) patients compared to the older age groups. Pearson’s chi-square test was used to analyze the differences in demographics, clinical characteristics, and etiologies for THA among age groups. This test assessed the associations between categorical variables such as insurance type and racial composition across different age groups. The p-values indicating statistical significance are reported (Table 2).

3.4. Prevalence of Comorbidities in THA Patients by Age Group

Younger patients (18–34.9) had lower rates of hypertension (p < 0.0001) and dyslipidemia (p < 0.0001) compared to older patients. However, they exhibited higher rates of chronic anemia (p = 0.002) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (p < 0.0001) compared to the oldest age group. Obesity (BMI over 35) and morbid obesity (BMI over 40) were more prevalent in the oldest age group (p < 0.0001 for both). The incidence of type 2 diabetes (p < 0.0001) and chronic lung disease (p < 0.0001) increased with age.
Younger patients also had a higher prevalence of sickle cell disorder (p < 0.0001) and coagulation defects (p < 0.0001) compared to older groups. The use of anticoagulants was highest in the oldest age group (p < 0.0001) (Table 3).

3.5. Hospitalization Outcomes by Age Group

According to Table 4, the LOS, total charges, and mortality rates varied by age group. Patients aged 18–34.9 years had the longest average stay (2.08 days) and the highest total charges ($70,540) compared to other age groups (p < 0.0001). Mortality rates remained low across all age groups, although statistically significant differences were observed (p = 0.009).

3.6. Postoperative Complications by Age Group

The rates of postoperative complications are presented in Table 5. Younger patients (18–34.9) had higher rates of blood loss anemia (16.69%), blood transfusion (3.80%), intraoperative fractures (0.83%), hip dislocation (0.49%), and pneumonia (0.15%) compared to older patients (p < 0.0001). Acute kidney injury and acute coronary artery disease increased with age.

3.7. Risk Estimates of Etiologies, Comorbidities, and Postoperative Complications

In this study, we compared three age groups; however, in this section, we focus on comparing patients under 35 with all other patients, encompassing a total of 1.6 million elective THA cases, to determine the odds ratios of various conditions and complications for younger patients compared to all ages of THA.
As shown in Figure 2, young patients with sickle cell disorders have an odds ratio of 36.078 (95% CI: 33.352–39.027), p < 0.0001. For coagulation defects, the odds ratio is 1.566 (95% CI: 1.360–1.802), p < 0.0001. IBD shows an odds ratio of 2.582 (95% CI: 2.270–2.938), p < 0.001, and connective tissue disorders have an odds ratio of 11.727 (95% CI: 9.470–14.523), p < 0.001.
As shown in Figure 3, young patients have higher odds ratios for hip dislocation (3.447, 95% CI: 2.774–4.282, p < 0.001) and blood transfusion (1.488, 95% CI: 1.381–1.604, p < 0.001).

4. Discussion

While osteoarthritis remains the leading cause of THA across all ages, our study aligns with previous research by indicating a higher prevalence of secondary causes in younger patients [9,15,16]. These secondary causes, such as osteonecrosis, congenital deformities, post-traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and lupus, often arise from underlying health conditions or injuries rather than the age-related degeneration seen in older adults. This younger population undergoing THA frequently presents with complex medical histories and conditions that necessitate earlier intervention to preserve joint function and mobility [7,16].
Furthermore, younger THA patients exhibit a distinct comorbidity profile compared to their older counterparts. IBD, coagulation defects, connective tissue disorders, and sickle cell disease are more prevalent in this younger group. These conditions not only increase the risk of developing arthritis at a younger age but also complicate THA procedures and postoperative management [15,17,18,19,20,21]. The higher rates of blood loss anemia and blood transfusion needs observed in younger patients further highlight the challenges of managing bleeding during and after surgery in this population.
Our analysis revealed significant differences in postoperative complications across age groups. Younger patients have higher odds ratios for hip dislocation and blood transfusion, indicating a greater susceptibility to these complications compared to older patients. This aligns with existing literature documenting the increased risk of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and the need for intensive management of these complications [22,23,24,25].
Our analysis revealed a clear trend: younger patients undergoing THA experienced longer hospital stays and incurred higher total charges compared to older patients [7,26,27]. This difference can be attributed to several factors. First, younger THA patients often have more complex medical histories, potentially requiring additional monitoring and interventions during their hospitalization. Second, the underlying cause of their arthritis might necessitate more extensive surgical procedures compared to older adults experiencing age-related degeneration. Finally, younger individuals tend to be more active after surgery. This higher activity level may require a more intensive rehabilitation program and a longer inpatient stay to ensure proper recovery.
These unique characteristics observed in younger THA patients highlight the importance of personalized surgical and postoperative care plans. Surgeons need to carefully consider the specific reasons for their arthritis (etiologies) and any pre-existing medical conditions (comorbidities) to optimize long-term outcomes.
For instance, the higher prevalence of coagulation defects in younger patients necessitates meticulous perioperative management of anticoagulation medications to minimize bleeding risks. Additionally, developing standardized protocols specifically tailored to younger patients with high post-surgical activity levels could improve rehabilitation outcomes and enhance patient satisfaction.

Strengths and Limitations

This study delves into THA trends among younger patients by utilizing a large, nationally representative dataset. While this offers robust insights, the reliance on administrative data has limitations. It does not capture long-term outcomes or patient-reported measures [28,29,30,31], both crucial for a complete understanding of THA success in younger individuals. Future research should incorporate long-term follow-up data and patient-reported experiences to provide a more comprehensive picture of how THA impacts quality of life in this population. Despite these limitations, the study’s extensive data volume and long timeframe offer valuable information about demographics, comorbidities, early postoperative results, and the economic burden of THA in younger patients.

5. Conclusions

Understanding the unique challenges and outcomes associated with THA in younger patients is crucial for optimizing care and improving long-term results. By addressing specific etiologies, managing comorbidities effectively, and tailoring postoperative care, healthcare providers can enhance the success of THA in young patients under 55. This comprehensive approach will ultimately inform better treatment strategies and healthcare policies, ensuring improved outcomes and quality of life for younger THA patients.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm13154535/s1: Table S1: ICD10 codes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.B.; Writing—original draft, D.M.; Writing—review & editing, L.F.; Supervision, Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted under exempt status granted by the institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived due to the de-identified nature of the NIS dataset.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

HCUPHealthcare Cost and Utilization Project
IBDInflammatory bowel disease
ICD-10International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision
LOSLength of stay
NISNationwide Inpatient Sample
SPSSStatistical Package for the Social Sciences
THATotal hip arthroplasty

References

  1. Gademan, M.G.J.; Hofstede, S.N.; Vlieland, T.P.M.V.; Nelissen, R.G.H.H.; De Mheen, P.J.M.-V. Indication criteria for total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: A state-of-the-science overview. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2016, 17, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Amstutz, H.C.; Thomas, B.J.; Jinnah, R.; Kim, W.; Grogan, T.; Yale, C. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 1984, 66, 228–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mäkelä, K.T.; Eskelinen, A.; Pulkkinen, P.; Paavolainen, P.; Remes, V. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older: An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2008, 90, 2160–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Horlocker, T.T. Pain Management in total joint arthroplasty: A historical review. Orthopedics 2010, 33, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Daras, M.; Macaulay, W. Total hip arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis. Am. J. Orthop. 2009, 38, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. McLaughlin, J.R.; Lee, K.R. Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients: 8-to 13-Year Results Using an Uncemented Stem. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2000, 373, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Deans, C.F.; Buckner, B.C.; Garvin, K.L. Wear, Osteolysis, and Aseptic Loosening Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients with Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene: A Review of Studies with a Follow-Up of over 15 Years. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 6615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hu, C.Y.; Yoon, T.-R. Recent updates for biomaterials used in total hip arthroplasty. Biomater. Res. 2018, 22, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. El-Desouky, I.I.; Helal, A.H.; Mansour, A.M.R. Ten-year survival of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2021, 16, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Patel, I.; Nham, F.; Zalikha, A.K.; El-Othmani, M.M. Epidemiology of total hip arthroplasty: Demographics, comorbidities and outcomes. Arthroplasty 2023, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Adeyemi, A.; Trueman, P. Economic burden of surgical site infections within the episode of care following joint replacement. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2019, 14, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zomar, B.O.; Marsh, J.D.; Lanting, B.A.; Bryant, D.M. A protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating the safety and cost-effectiveness of outpatient total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2020, 21, 663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chin, G.; Wright, D.J.; Snir, N.; Schwarzkopf, R. Primary vs. conversion total hip arthroplasty: A cost analysis. J. Arthroplast. 2016, 31, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Daigle, M.E.; Weinstein, A.M.; Katz, J.N.; Losina, E. The cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty: A systematic review of published literature. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2012, 26, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Punzi, L.; Frigato, M.; Frallonardo, P.; Ramonda, R. Post-traumatic arthritis: Overview on pathogenic mechanisms and role of inflammation. RMD Open 2016, 2, e000279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Negm, A.M.; Beaupre, L.A.; Goplen, C.M.; Weeks, C.; Jones, C.A. A scoping review of total hip arthroplasty survival and reoperation rates in patients of 55 years or younger: Health services implications for revision surgeries. Arthroplast. Today 2022, 16, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nasimuzzaman, M.; Malik, P. Role of the coagulation system in the pathogenesis of sickle cell disease. Blood Adv. 2019, 3, 3170–3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kaur, D.; Kerlin, B.A. Bleeding associated with connective tissue disorders. In Management of Bleeding Patients; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 201–209. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jeong, G.K.; Cross, M.B.; Morin, R.L.; Rodriguez, E.K.; Zurakowski, D.; Thornhill, T.S. Total hip arthroplasty in sickle cell hemoglobinopathies. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2005, 13, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moran, M.M.; Wessman, P.; Rolfson, O.; Bohl, D.D.; Kärrholm, J.; Keshavarzian, A.; Sumner, D.R. The risk of revision following total hip arthroplasty in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, a registry based study. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Korompilias, A.V.; Ortel, T.L.; Urbaniak, J.R. Coagulation abnormalities in patients with hip osteonecrosis. Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 2004, 35, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Conroy, J.L.; Whitehouse, M.R.; Bolland, B.J.R.F.; Timperley, A.J.; Gie, G.A.; Howell, J.R. Risk factors for revision for early dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplast. 2008, 23, 867–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lamb, J.N.; Baetz, J.; Messer-Hannemann, P.; Eastwick-Field, P.; Emerton, M.; Pandit, H.G. Risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures during primary total hip arthroplasty. An analysis from the national joint registry for England and Wales and the Isle of Man. J. Arthroplast. 2019, 34, 3065–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ricioli, W.; Dall’Oca, C.; Andriolo, L.; Valenti, M.T.; Ortolani, S.; Samaila, E.M. Prevalence and risk factors for intra-operative periprosthetic fractures in one thousand eight hundred and seventy two patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: A cross-sectional study. Int. Orthop. 2015, 39, 1939–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Abdel, M.P.; Watts, C.D.; Houdek, M.T.; Lewallen, D.G.; Berry, D.J. Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties: A 40-year experience. Bone Jt. J. 2016, 98, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Busch, V. The young osteoarthritic hip: Clinical outcome of total hip arthroplasty and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Acta Orthop. 2015, 86 (Suppl. S360), S1–S21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ashraf, A.; Singh, V.K.; Mehta, S.S.; Woodgate, I. Hospital costs of total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2014, 472, 2237–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Maman, D.; Mahamid, A.; Finkel, B.; Gan-Or, H.; Fournier, L.; Berkovich, Y.; Behrbalk, E. Comparative evaluation of postoperative outcomes and expenditure between robotic and conventional single-level lumbar fusion surgery: A comprehensive analysis of nationwide inpatient sample data. Eur. Spine J. 2024, 33, 2637–2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Maman, D.; Laver, L.; Becker, R.; Mahamid, A.; Berkovich, Y. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty reduces postoperative complications and length of stay without increased cost compared to navigation-guided techniques: A national analysis. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Maman, D.; Laver, L.; Becker, R.; Takrori, L.A.; Mahamid, A.; Finkel, B.; Gan-Or, H.; Yonai, Y.; Berkovich, Y. Trends and Epidemiology in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Reduced Complications and Shorter Hospital Stays. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Maman, D.; Mahamid, A.; Yonai, Y.; Berkovich, Y. Comparing Complication Rates, Costs, and Length of Stay between Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Insights from a Big Data Analysis Using the National Inpatient Sample Dataset. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Percentage of THA procedures among different age groups (2016–2019).
Figure 1. Percentage of THA procedures among different age groups (2016–2019).
Jcm 13 04535 g001
Figure 2. Odds ratios of etiologies and comorbidities in younger patients (under 35) undergoing THA compared to all other THA patients.
Figure 2. Odds ratios of etiologies and comorbidities in younger patients (under 35) undergoing THA compared to all other THA patients.
Jcm 13 04535 g002
Figure 3. Odds ratios of postoperative complications in younger patients (under 35) undergoing THA compared to all other THA patients.
Figure 3. Odds ratios of postoperative complications in younger patients (under 35) undergoing THA compared to all other THA patients.
Jcm 13 04535 g003
Table 1. Distribution of etiologies for THA by age group.
Table 1. Distribution of etiologies for THA by age group.
EtiologiesUnder 35Age 35–44.9Age 45–54.9Significance
Primary osteoarthritis (%)56.15%77.30%91.32%p < 0.0001
Osteonecrosis (%)35.86%20.16%7.77%
Congenital deformities of hip (%)2.69%1.14%0.31%
Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease2.24%0.34%0.07%
Rheumatoid arthritis (%)1.15%0.29%0.21%
Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (%)0.73%0.11%0.01%
Post-traumatic arthritis (%)0.60%0.50%0.20%
Acquired leg deformity (%)0.27%0.11%0.07%
Arthropathic psoriasis (%)0.12%0.05%0.03%
Systemic lupus erythematosus (%)0.18%0.00%0.01%
Table 2. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics by age group.
Table 2. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics by age group.
ParameterUnder 35Age 35–44.9Age 45–54.9Significance
Total surgeries (count)16,29541,045174,290-
Female (%)45.4%43.7%46.1%p < 0.0001
Payer—Medicare (%)8.1%9.2%9.6%p < 0.0001
Payer—Medicaid (%)28.0%19.1%13.8%
Payer—private (%)56.8%65.2%71.0%
Payer—other (including self-pay) (%)7.2%6.6%5.6%
Race—White (%)62.5%71.0%78.2%p < 0.0001
Race—Black (%)18.7%16.0%13.0%
Race—Hispanic (%)11.1%8.0%5.4%
Race—Asian or Pacific Islander (%)2.9%1.8%1.0%
Race—Native American (%)0.6%0.6%0.4%
Race—Other (%)4.2%2.7%2.0%
Table 3. Prevalence of comorbidities in THA patients by age group.
Table 3. Prevalence of comorbidities in THA patients by age group.
ParameterUnder 35Age 35–44.9Age 45–54.9Significance
Hypertension diagnosis (%)12.64%28.15%41.31%p < 0.0001
Dyslipidemia diagnosis (%)3.99%13.03%24.23%p < 0.0001
Chronic anemia (%)5.58%4.98%4.95%p = 0.002
Osteoporosis (%)1.26%1.02%1.32%p < 0.0001
Alcohol abuse (%)2.70%3.16%2.47%p < 0.0001
Type 2 diabetes (%)2.33%6.42%10.45%p < 0.0001
Renal disease (%)2.49%1.89%2.11%p < 0.0001
CHF (%)0.25%0.32%0.63%p = 0.004
Chronic lung disease (%)0.61%2.07%4.37%p < 0.0001
Obesty (%)18.35%28.05%30.42%p < 0.0001
Morbid (severe) obesity (%)9.79%17.51%18.62%p < 0.0001
IBD1.4%1.1%0.6%p < 0.0001
Coagulation defects1.2%1.0%0.8%p < 0.0001
Connective tissues disorder0.6%0.3%0.1%p < 0.0001
Gout0.7%1.8%2.5%p < 0.0001
Use of anticoagulants2.30%2.05%2.61%p < 0.0001
Sickle cell disorder5.3%1.2%0.3%p < 0.0001
Table 4. Hospitalization outcomes by age group.
Table 4. Hospitalization outcomes by age group.
ParameterUnder 35Age 35–44.9Age 45–54.9Significance
Died during hospitalization (%)0.0310.0000.017p = 0.009
Length of stay (mean in days)2.081.891.82p < 0.0001
Total charges (mean in $)70,54065,71662,589p < 0.0001
Table 5. Postoperative complications by age group.
Table 5. Postoperative complications by age group.
ParameterUnder 35Age 35–44.9Age 45–54.9Significance
Blood loss anemia (%)16.69%16.10%15.25%p < 0.0001
Blood transfusion (%)3.80%2.63%2.04%p < 0.0001
Intraoperative fracture (%)0.83%0.74%0.66%p < 0.0001
Hip dislocation (%)0.49%0.33%0.30%p < 0.0001
Pneumonia (%)0.15%0.05%0.09%p < 0.0001
Venous thromboembolism (%)0.12%0.16%0.07%p < 0.0001
Pulmonary embolism (%)0.09%0.11%0.06%p = 0.005
Acute kidney injury (%)0.61%0.69%0.81%p = 0.002
Acute coronary artery disease (%)0.00%0.00%0.02%p = 0.003
Pulmonary edema (%)0.00%0.00%0.02%p = 0.001
Heart failure (%)0.00%0.01%0.01%p = 0.301
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maman, D.; Fournier, L.; Steinfeld, Y.; Berkovich, Y. Etiology, Outcomes, and Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Younger Patients: A Nationwide Big Data Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 4535. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154535

AMA Style

Maman D, Fournier L, Steinfeld Y, Berkovich Y. Etiology, Outcomes, and Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Younger Patients: A Nationwide Big Data Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(15):4535. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154535

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maman, David, Linor Fournier, Yaniv Steinfeld, and Yaron Berkovich. 2024. "Etiology, Outcomes, and Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Younger Patients: A Nationwide Big Data Analysis" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 15: 4535. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154535

APA Style

Maman, D., Fournier, L., Steinfeld, Y., & Berkovich, Y. (2024). Etiology, Outcomes, and Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Younger Patients: A Nationwide Big Data Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(15), 4535. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154535

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop