Next Article in Journal
Impact of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant on Safety and Outcomes of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CAR-T) Therapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM)
Next Article in Special Issue
Adaptive Hyperactivity and Biomarker Exploration: Insights from Elders in the Blue Zone of Sardinia
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Pancreatic Surgery: The Surgeon’s Point of View
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prevalence and Risk by Age and Sex of Sleep Dysregulation and Depressive Episodes in Bipolar and Depressive Disorders in a Community Survey in Sardinia, Italy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Alexithymia and Bipolar Disorder: Virtual Reality Could Be a Useful Tool for the Treatment and Prevention of These Conditions in People with a Physical Comorbidity

1
Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
2
IDEGO Digital Psychology Society, 00197 Rome, Italy
3
CEREBRUM VR, 00197 Rome, Italy
4
Department of Systems Medicine, University of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
5
The National Alliance for Neuromuscular Diseases and Neuroscience GANGLION Skopje, Skopje 1000, North Macedonia
6
Department of Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy
7
Institute of Psychiatry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(20), 6206; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206206
Submission received: 24 May 2024 / Revised: 14 October 2024 / Accepted: 16 October 2024 / Published: 18 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stress, Rhythms Dysregulation and Bipolar Spectrum)

Abstract

:
Background: Alexithymia, a predictor in chronic illnesses, like cardiovascular and bipolar disorder (CD–BD), could be improved with a virtual reality (VR) cognitive remediation program. This secondary analysis of a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates alexithymia improvement and its factors in an experimental group versus a control group, exploring extensions to individuals with comorbid non-psychiatric chronic conditions. Methods: A feasibility cross-over RCT (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05070065) enrolled individuals aged 18–75 with mood disorders (BD, DSM-IV), excluding those with relapses, epilepsy, or severe eye conditions due to potential risks with VR. Alexithymia levels were measured using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale with 20 items (TAS-20). Results: The study included 39 individuals in the experimental group and 25 in the control group, with no significant age or sex differences observed. Significantly improved alexithymia scores were noted in the experimental group compared to controls (F = 111.9; p < 0.0001) and in subgroups with chronic non-psychiatric comorbidities (F = 4.293, p = 0.048). Scores were particularly improved for difficulty in identifying feelings (F = 92.42; p < 0.00001), communicating feelings (F = 61.34; p < 0.00001), and externally oriented thinking (F = 173.12; p < 0.00001). Conclusions: The findings highlight alexithymia enhancement in BD, even with comorbid non-psychiatric chronic diseases. Given its impact on BD progression and related conditions, like CD, developing and evaluating VR-based tools in this context is suggested by these findings.

1. Background

The term “Alexithymia” originates from the Greek words “lexis” (word) and “thymos” (emotion), coined by A (the Greek privative), thus signifying “lack of words for emotions”. Peter Emanuel Sifneos introduced this term to delineate the characteristics observed in individuals exhibiting psychosomatic symptoms who struggled to engage in a psychotherapeutic relationship [1,2]. Those with high levels of alexithymia exhibit minimal awareness of their emotional experiences and symptoms, along with difficulties in expressing their moods and feelings, and struggle to emotionally engage with situations. When questioned about their emotional state, they tend to describe their discomfort in vague and confusing terms, often attributing it to bodily sensations rather than psychological distress [3]. Therefore, alexithymia is characterized as a personality trait marked by (a) difficulty in distinguishing and identifying specific emotions, including discerning somatic sensations from emotions; (b) significant difficulty in expressing one’s emotions verbally; (c) limited imaginative capacity; and (d) a tendency to focus on external stimuli with a lack of attention towards internal cues [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Alexithymia has been linked to numerous chronic illnesses [7,8] and is recognized as a negative prognostic factor, particularly in cardiovascular disorders (CDs), which are closely associated with bipolar disorder (BD) [9,10]. Actually, it plays a significant role in delaying treatment for acute myocardial infarction [11], consequently impacting patient outcomes. Following a myocardial infarction, it is linked to lower survival rates [12]. Only recently has research focused to the significance of alexithymia in BD. It is now evident that individuals with this disorder typically exhibit higher levels of alexithymia compared to those without it [13,14]. Furthermore, there is an observed association between high level of alexithymia and histories of childhood abuse, as well as an elevated risk of suicide among individuals with BD. Specifically, emotional dysregulation appears to act as a mediating factor in the risk of suicidal ideation [15]. Therefore, it is not surprising that alexithymia is recognized as a predictor of adverse outcomes and social decline in individuals with BD [16,17]. To address these complex needs, mental health rehabilitation aims to employ intervention models that integrate diverse techniques in accordance with theoretical frameworks and evidence-based practices [18,19,20]. New evolutionary models, which consider the social determinants of health, interpret illnesses not merely as products of biological determinism but rather as outcomes influenced by multiple factors that contribute to the development of both physical and mental comorbidities [21,22,23]. These factors also limit individuals in their achievement of recovery goals, including personal and social aspects [21]. Thus, it is crucial for rehabilitative interventions to be recovery-oriented and to incorporate these multifactorial aspects into their methodology [24]. In order to attain their subjective recovery goals, it becomes of primary importance to develop tools capable of modifying also alexithymia levels in individuals suffering from both BD and CD.
In this regard, cognitive remediation (CR) interventions are currently recognized as a promising treatment for BD [25,26,27,28,29]. They offer the potential to bridge the gap between symptomatic relief and achieving full functional recovery by improving not only cognitive outcomes but also clinical and social functioning [25,30,31]. This is due to the intervention method incorporating combined cognitive and behavioral techniques aimed at generalization into everyday life [32,33]. With the advancement of technology and its application in prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation settings, CR training are also integrating technologies such as virtual reality (VR) [34,35]. Fully immersive VR offers the intrinsic advantage of rendering the rehabilitation setting experience appealing, aligned with the individual’s real-life needs, and facilitating learning [36,37,38,39,40,41].
For these reasons, immersive VR-based CR training has been developed for BD treatment, aiming not only to improve cognitive processes but also addressing alexithymia, biological and social rhythms, quality of life, and depression and anxiety symptoms. A comprehensive and multidimensional approach is required, ranging from cognitive and emotional aspects to rhythm regulation and symptom management, components primarily implicated in BD. The current study is part of a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated the feasibility of the intervention in this specific population as the primary outcome, and the preliminary efficacy regarding cognitive, clinical and functional variables as secondary outcomes; the protocol and the results were previously published [42,43].

2. Aims

The aim of this research is to conduct a detailed secondary analysis of the previously mentioned randomized controlled trial (RCT), investigating the preliminary efficacy of VR-based cognitive remediation (VR-CR) training (NCT05070065). The initial study observed an enhancement in alexithymia levels, evidenced by a reduction in scores on the Toronto Alexithymia Scale with 20 items (TAS-20) [44] linked to the VR intervention [42]. This secondary analysis seeks to achieve several objectives: firstly, to understand the change and quantify the degree of improvement in alexithymia levels in the VR-treated group compared to the control group; secondly, we aimed to identify which specific aspects of alexithymia (difficulty recognizing feelings, difficulty describing feelings, and externally oriented thinking) are most influenced by the intervention; and thirdly, to determine if the observed improvement in alexithymia extends to the subgroup of participants with mood disorders (specifically BD, as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) who also have comorbid non-psychiatric chronic diseases.
By addressing these objectives, this study aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the future efficacy of VR-CR training in improving emotional processing difficulties. The findings will contribute to the broader field of psychosomatic medicine by highlighting the potential of VR-based interventions to enhance emotional awareness and regulation in individuals with complex clinical profiles.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Design

This study is a feasibility cross-over RCT [42], with the protocol number NCT05070065 registered on ClinicalTrials.gov in 2021. The primary aim of the original investigation was to evaluate the feasibility of the study, while the current analysis focuses on one of the declared secondary outcomes, namely the “level of alexithymia” [43]. The design and execution of the survey adhered strictly to the CONSORT guidelines for feasibility studies, ensuring methodological rigor and transparency [44]. The primary outcome of the initial study was to assess various aspects of feasibility, including participant recruitment, retention rates, and adherence to the intervention protocol and clinical outcomes as secondary outcomes. For the current study the secondary analysis presented here specifically examines changes in alexithymia levels among participants, providing additional insights into the potential benefits of the intervention beyond the primary feasibility outcomes. This comprehensive approach allows for an understanding of both the practicality of implementing the intervention and its impact on emotional processing difficulties, which is crucial for informing future research and clinical practice.

3.2. Sample

Participants enrolled in the randomized controlled trial (RCT) were diagnosed with a mood disorder, specifically bipolar disorder (BD), according to the diagnostic criteria outlined in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) [45]. They were recruited from individuals seeking treatment at the Consultation Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Center of the Hospital “San Giovanni di Dio” (University Hospital of Cagliari).
Inclusion criteria required individuals to be aged between 18 and 75 years old, with no gender restrictions, and to have provided informed consent before the intervention began. Exclusion criteria comprised current manic or depressive episodes due to the severity of symptoms, which would preclude bi-weekly participation over three months in an outpatient setting, and severe eye diseases or epilepsy due to the potential exacerbation or recurrence of symptoms under VR stimulation. Participants were randomized into two groups by a biometrician utilizing a computerized algorithm, ensuring blinding with respect to the final participant identifiers. The researcher overseeing the randomization process was not involved in the subsequent phases of the study. Additionally, the researchers responsible for psychometric assessments were blinded to the specific intervention assigned to each participant, ensuring the integrity and objectivity of the assessment process. This rigorous methodology was designed to minimize bias and enhance the reliability of the study’s findings.

3.3. Experimental and Control Groups

Participants assigned to the experimental group received fully immersive VR-CR training. The VR environment was generated by the “CEREBRUM” software (version 3.0.1), developed by the Italian small and medium enterprise Cerebrum VR (Italy). A comprehensive description of the software is available in previously published papers [42,43]. In summary the device used is an all-in-one headset Oculus Go, CE-marked, providing 360° visual immersion, with the use of a controller to select options during the exercises. The immersive scenarios encompassed domestic and urban settings, directly facilitating training of both cognitive and personally functional strategies through everyday life tasks. During the exercises, auditory stimuli are also present, including exercise instructions, urban sounds, weather-related sounds, and in some scenarios, social settings with dialogue.
The tasks varied in difficulty, allowing clinicians to adjust the exercises based on participants’ functional performance levels and specific competencies. Consequently, the learning process was stimulating rather than frustrating, as the exercises were adapted to each participant’s specific level. The intervention consisted of 24 sessions, each lasting 45 min, conducted twice a week, and completed over 3 months. It was manualized and developed with a human-centered [46,47], recovery-oriented, and bio–psycho–social approach [24,48,49]. The session methodology was specifically described in the trial protocol [43]. In summary, it adheres to an integrated hierarchical approach where emphasis is placed on training strategies that integrate emotional, cognitive, metacognition, social cognition and behavioral techniques [20,32,50]. Indeed, each session included an introduction with mindfulness techniques to promote emotional integration in the cognitive learning process, psychoeducation on functions to enhance awareness and self-monitoring, and generalization to promote the implementation of trained strategies in the individual’s life context according to their needs. Both the control group and the experimental group received treatment as usual (psychiatric consultation with pharmacotherapy with or without psychotherapy). Therefore, the comparison is between the experimental group receiving VR plus treatment as usual versus the control group receiving only treatment as usual. The intervention was carried out by mental health rehabilitation experts, including psychiatric rehabilitation technicians and psychologists [51].

3.4. Outcome and Study Tools

The outcome of this secondary analysis is the level of alexithymia, as measured by the TAS-20 [6,52] in its Italian version [53]. Originally, in the research protocol registered on ClinicalTrials and approved by the local Ethics Committee (see the Ethical Aspects section), this was designated as a secondary outcome. The TAS-20 is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 20 items, each rated on a Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The TAS-20 provides a total score that reflects the overall level of alexithymia. Additionally, the tool assesses three primary dimensions central to the construct of alexithymia: (1) difficulty recognizing feelings and distinguishing them from physical sensations (F1), (2) difficulty describing and communicating one’s feelings to others (F2), and (3) a cognitive style oriented toward external realities (F3). The TAS-20 has demonstrated good reliability, as well as factorial, convergent, and discriminant validity. Scores range from 20 to 100, with a total score exceeding 60 indicating the presence of significant alexithymia. This comprehensive tool allows for a nuanced understanding of the various facets of alexithymia, making it a valuable instrument in the assessment of emotional processing difficulties [6,52].

3.5. Statistical Analysis

The change in the TAS-20 total score (in the overall sample experimental and control sample and in subsamples of people with comorbid chronic diseases) and of each TAS-20 sub scale within group by time (To vs T1) was calculated as difference in the mean score ± standard deviation (SD); the differences in score change T0 vs T1 between groups was measured using ANOVA one-way statistics. The comparison of non-parametric variables was carried out using the chi-square test with Yates correction where needed. A p value < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. The analysis of the change in the frequency of people with alexithymia in the groups from T0 to T1 was carried out by using the analysis of variance for nominal data by Castellan [53].

4. Results

The final experimental sample consisted of 39 individuals out of the initially recruited 50, with some dropouts occurring during follow-up. This was compared to 25 individuals in the control group, and no dropouts occurred. The degrees of freedom correspond to df = 1.62.
No statistically significant differences were observed between the experimental and control groups in terms of mean age and frequency of sex, as shown in Table 1, both in the total groups and in subgroups with comorbid chronic diseases. Within the subgroup of individuals with comorbid chronic diseases, the experimental group included seven individuals with chronic thyroid disease, four with CD, three with neurological disorders, three with autoimmune or rheumatological diseases, three with female genital disorders, one with diabetes, two with spinal hernias, and two with chronic gastrointestinal diseases (some individuals experienced multiple disorders). In contrast, the control group comprised two individuals with chronic thyroid disease, one with CD, one with neurological disorders, two with autoimmune or rheumatological diseases, three with female genital disorders, one with diabetes, and two with chronic gastrointestinal diseases (some individuals experienced multiple disorders). As showed in Table 2, a notable decrease was observed in the overall TAS-20 score, indicating an improvement in alexithymia within the experimental group compared to the control group. This trend was also evident across the three components, namely difficulty identifying feelings, difficulty communicating feelings to others, and externally oriented thinking. Similarly, within the experimental group, there was a decrease in the frequency of individuals with high alexithymia, dropping from 43.5% at T0 to 25.6% at T1. In contrast, the control group witnessed an increase in individuals with high alexithymia, rising from 24% to 52% (analysis of variance for nominal data by Castellan), as detailed in Table 3. The contrast in alexithymia improvement from T0 to T1 persists when comparing the two subgroups, namely experimental and control, that presented comorbidity with another chronic non-psychiatric pathology (Table 4).

5. Discussion

The study highlighted that fully immersive VR-based CR training for individuals with BD could led to improvements in alexithymia, as assessed by the TAS-20 scale, within the experimental group compared to the control group and possible prevention of worsening. Notably, there were significant enhancements in the scores of the three subscales constituting the construct of alexithymia when compared with the worsening in the control condition.
In line with these findings, the experimental group experienced a reduction in the number of individuals with high alexithymia at T1, whereas the control group did not exhibit such an improvement; on the contrary, they exhibited a worsening. Moreover, the positive impact on alexithymia following the intervention was evident when comparing subgroups with or without chronic non-psychiatric pathologies. This finding holds significance considering that alexithymia has been identified as a negative prognostic factor in BD. While the direct correlation between improving alexithymia and the course of BD remains uncertain, it is plausible that such improvement could positively influence the disorder; certainly, these interpretations (which provide no information regarding the correlation) must be confirmed in future studies. This assumption is rooted in the recognition that alexithymia indicates poor awareness of one’s emotional experiences. In the management of BD, early symptom recognition and communication are essential for relapse prevention [54,55]. Several pieces of evidence support the notion that early symptom recognition is integral to psychosocial interventions aimed at preventing relapse [56,57,58,59,60]. Recent research has highlighted the presence of individuals exhibiting hyperactivity traits who function well socially and professionally without evident pathologies, despite representing a potential area of vulnerability towards BD, particularly under stressful conditions [60,61,62]. Developing an effective tool to address alexithymia could prove invaluable for such individuals, especially during periods of heightened stress that may trigger BD. In hyperactive individuals, there might be a tendency to deny symptoms, potentially leading to maladaptive coping mechanisms [63,64,65,66].
Another area of potential interest lies in the prevention of chronic pathologies, with particular attention to certain conditions, like CD. Our study reveals an improvement in alexithymia in the experimental group when compared with the worsening in the control condition, even in cases of BD comorbid with chronic non-psychiatric conditions. This suggests that it could be valuable to investigate whether a similar outcome is achievable in individuals with CD, specifically those with cardiovascular atherosclerosis and post-myocardial infarction patients. As noted in the introduction, alexithymia is a significant barrier to seeking treatment among individuals who have experienced a heart attack [3,11]. Additionally, alexithymia is associated with increased mortality following a heart attack. Difficulty in interpreting bodily symptoms may lead to delayed treatment-seeking behavior. Therefore, an intervention that is both enjoyable and easy to implement, with a recovery-oriented approach, could serve as a valuable preventive tool for at-risk populations. Employing a comprehensive intervention methodology, which addresses various needs and is translated into multidimensional techniques, could serve as a reproducible and effective approach for managing comorbidity across different disorders. For instance, it could be used to manage the relationship between BD and CD [67], as the latter constitute one of the leading causes of premature death in individuals with BD [68,69,70].
In conclusion, it is essential to explore why the intervention achieved this important and somewhat unexpected outcome. One hypothesis for future research is whether the effect on alexithymia could be a secondary result of cognitive improvement. However, a crucial factor may be the mindfulness component integrated into each session, along with the VR experience that fosters a sense of a “judgment-free” environment. Indeed, a central aspect of mindfulness practice is cultivating an open, non-reactive awareness of inner experiences, which is vital for emotional regulation [71].

5.1. Limitations

The main limitations of the present study are related to the sample size and the absence of an intention-to-treat analysis. Specifically, the sample size is insufficient to definitively demonstrate the effectiveness of these results. Additionally, the marked worsening observed in the control sample could be due to chance, and, therefore, this finding should be supported by more robust phase three studies.

5.2. Implication for Research

Future prospective research should investigate whether similar outcomes can be achieved in individuals with chronic diseases, particularly those with cardiovascular atherosclerosis and post-myocardial infarction patients. Furthermore, exploring whether alexithymia could be a secondary outcome of cognitive improvement, especially when combined with mindfulness, in the treatment of BD. It is also crucial that these findings be validated in studies with larger sample sizes capable of demonstrating their effectiveness.

6. Conclusions

This study demonstrates an improvement in alexithymia, when compared with the worsening in the control condition, among individuals with BD, even when they are also managing other non-psychiatric chronic diseases, and, thus, are presenting with comorbid conditions. The improvement was achieved through a VR-based CR intervention utilizing a multidisciplinary approach, including mindfulness techniques, cognitive training in VR, and the generalization of trained strategies for daily life. The study primarily targeted other aspects of BD, such as feasibility outcomes and cognitive impairment. Given the significant role that alexithymia plays in the chronic course of BD and other chronic conditions, such as CD, our findings underscore the importance of developing and rigorously studying the efficacy of specialized tools. These tools should utilize fully immersive VR technology and be oriented towards recovery, aiming to address not only the primary symptoms of BD but also the comorbid conditions that often accompany it.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.S.; methodology, A.P. and D.P.; software, V.D.L. and L.D.N.; formal analysis, D.P., A.E.N. and F.S.; investigation S.L., A.G., E.P. and E.C.; resources, F.S. and A.P.; data curation, G.K.; writing—original draft preparation, F.S.; writing—review and editing, F.S., A.P., V.D.L., S.L., A.G., E.P., E.C., M.N., D.P., L.D.N., A.E.N., R.M. and G.K.; supervision, F.S. and A.P.; project administration, D.P.; funding acquisition, A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The project received financial support from Fondazione di Sardegna. (U351.2020/AI.334.MGB-2020.1581). However, the funding organization did not take part in the study’s design, or the determination to present and disseminate its findings.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The protocol received approval from the Local Independent Ethics Committee under the designation Prot. PG/2020/21681. Additionally, this study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05070065, September 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

The research adhered to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Prior to enrollment, all patients provided written informed consent, either personally or through their legal guardians.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors disclose that there are no conflicts of interest, whether financial or otherwise. It is pertinent to note that two co-authors (VDL and LDN) serve as legal administrators for the societies responsible for the development of the CEREBRUM software.

References

  1. Sifneos, P.E. The Prevalence of ‘Alexithymic’ Characteristics in Psychosomatic Patients. Psychother. Psychosom. 1973, 22, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lumley, M.A.; Neely, L.C.; Burger, A.J. The Assessment of Alexithymia in Medical Settings: Implications for Understanding and Treating Health Problems. J. Pers. Assess. 2007, 89, 230–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sancassiani, F.; Montisci, R.; Meloni, L.; Nardi, A.E.; Carta, M.G. Why Is It Important to Assess and Treat Alexithymia in the Cardiologic Field? An Overview of the Literature. Clin. Pract. Epidemiol. Ment. Health 2023, 19, e174501792307140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Taylor, G.J. Recent Developments in Alexithymia Theory and Research. Can. J. Psychiatry 2000, 45, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Taylor, G.J.; Bagby, R.M. New Trends in Alexithymia Research. Psychother. Psychosom. 2004, 73, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Taylor, G.J.; Bagby, R.M.; Ryan, D.P.; Parker, J.D.A. Validation of the Alexithymia Construct: A Measurement-Based Approach. Can. J. Psychiatry 1990, 35, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wen, J.; Wu, Y.; Peng, L.; Chen, S.; Yuan, J.; Wang, W.; Cong, L. Constructing and Verifying an Alexithymia Risk-Prediction Model for Older Adults with Chronic Diseases Living in Nursing Homes: A Cross-Sectional Study in China. Geriatrics 2022, 7, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shibata, M.; Ninomiya, T.; Jensen, M.P.; Anno, K.; Yonemoto, K.; Makino, S.; Iwaki, R.; Yamashiro, K.; Yoshida, T.; Imada, Y.; et al. Alexithymia Is Associated with Greater Risk of Chronic Pain and Negative Affect and with Lower Life Satisfaction in a General Population: The Hisayama Study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Polcwiartek, C.; O’Gallagher, K.; Friedman, D.J.; Correll, C.U.; Solmi, M.; Jensen, S.E.; Nielsen, R.E. Severe Mental Illness: Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Management. Eur. Heart J. 2024, 45, 987–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Miley, K.M.; Hooker, S.A.; Crain, A.L.; O’Connor, P.J.; Haapala, J.L.; Bond, D.J.; Rossom, R.C. 30-Year Cardiovascular Disease Risk for Young Adults with Serious Mental Illness. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 2023, 85, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sancassiani, F.; Montisci, R.; Preti, A.; Paribello, P.; Meloni, L.; Romano, F.; Nardi, A.E.; Carta, M.G. Surviving to Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Role of Psychological Factors and Alexithymia in Delayed Time to Searching Care: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Carta, M.G.; Sancassiani, F.; Bina, D.; Licciardi, M.; Cossu, G.; Nardi, A.E.; Meloni, L.; Montisci, R. Alexithymia Is a Determinant of Early Death in the Long-Term Course of Post-Myocardial Infarction. J. Public Health Res. 2022, 11, jphr.2022.2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Craba, A.; Marano, G.; Kotzalidis, G.; Avallone, C.; Lisci, F.; Crosta, M.; Callea, A.; Monti, L.; De Berardis, D.; Lai, C.; et al. Resilience and Attachment in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Namlı, Z.; Tamam, L.; Demirkol, M.E.; Karaytuğ, M.O.; Yeşiloğlu, C.; Uğur, K. The Relationship among Dyadic Adjustment and Disease Burden in Patients with Bipolar Disorder and Their Spouses. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khosravani, V.; Berk, M.; Sharifi Bastan, F.; Samimi Ardestani, S.M.; Wrobel, A. The Effects of Childhood Emotional Maltreatment and Alexithymia on Depressive and Manic Symptoms and Suicidal Ideation in Females with Bipolar Disorder: Emotion Dysregulation as a Mediator. Int. J. Psychiatry Clin. Pract. 2021, 25, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ospina, L.H.; Shanahan, M.; Perez-Rodriguez, M.M.; Chan, C.C.; Clari, R.; Burdick, K.E. Alexithymia Predicts Poorer Social and Everyday Functioning in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2019, 273, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Karayagiz, S.; Basturk, M. Alexithymia Levels in Patients with Unipolar and Bipolar Depression and the Effect of Alexithymia on Both Severity of Depression Symptoms and Quality of Life. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg. 2016, 17, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Engert, V.; Grant, J.A.; Strauss, B. Psychosocial Factors in Disease and Treatment—A Call for the Biopsychosocial Model. JAMA Psychiatry 2020, 77, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Porter, R.J. The Biopsychosocial Model in Mental Health. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2020, 54, 773–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wiest, G. Neural and Mental Hierarchies. Front. Psychol. 2012, 3, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kirkbride, J.B.; Anglin, D.M.; Colman, I.; Dykxhoorn, J.; Jones, P.B.; Patalay, P.; Pitman, A.; Soneson, E.; Steare, T.; Wright, T.; et al. The Social Determinants of Mental Health and Disorder: Evidence, Prevention and Recommendations. World Psychiatry 2024, 23, 58–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fiorillo, A.; Giordano, A. The Biopsychosocial Model of Schizophrenia and Cancer: Unraveling the Etiopathogenesis of Complex Diseases. Eur. Psychiatry 2022, 65, e86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bhugra, D. Migration and Depression. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2003, 108, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Giusti, L.; Ussorio, D.; Salza, A.; Casacchia, M.; Roncone, R. Easier Said than Done: The Challenge to Teach “Personal Recovery” to Mental Health Professionals through a Short, Targeted and Structured Training Programme. Community Ment. Health J. 2022, 58, 1014–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Samamé, C.; Durante, P.; Cattaneo, B.; Aprahamian, I.; Strejilevich, S. Efficacy of Cognitive Remediation in Bipolar Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Psychol. Med. 2023, 53, 5361–5373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tsapekos, D.; Strawbridge, R.; Cella, M.; Goldsmith, K.; Kalfas, M.; Taylor, R.H.; Swidzinski, S.; Marwaha, S.; Grey, L.; Newton, E.; et al. Cognitive Remediation in Bipolar (CRiB2): Study Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing Efficacy and Mechanisms of Cognitive Remediation Therapy Compared to Treatment as Usual. BMC Psychiatry 2023, 23, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Accardo, V.; Barlati, S.; Ceraso, A.; Nibbio, G.; Vieta, E.; Vita, A. Efficacy of Functional Remediation on Cognitive and Psychosocial Functioning in Patients with Bipolar Disorder: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Study. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ott, C.V.; Macoveanu, J.; Bowie, C.R.; Fisher, P.M.; Knudsen, G.M.; Kessing, L.V.; Miskowiak, K.W. Change in Prefrontal Activity and Executive Functions after Action-Based Cognitive Remediation in Bipolar Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neuropsychopharmacology 2021, 46, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bernabei, L.; Bersani, F.S.; Pompili, E.; Delle Chiaie, R.; Valente, D.; Corrado, A.; Vergnani, L.; Ferracuti, S.; Biondi, M.; Coccanari de’Fornari, M.A. Cognitive Remediation for the Treatment of Neuropsychological Disturbances in Subjects with Euthymic Bipolar Disorder: Findings from a Controlled Study. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 273, 576–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Macoveanu, J.; Damgaard, V.; Ott, C.V.; Knudsen, G.M.; Kessing, L.V.; Miskowiak, K.W. Action-Based Cognitive Remediation in Bipolar Disorder Improved Verbal Memory but Had No Effect on the Neural Response during Episodic Memory Encoding. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 2022, 319, 111418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tsapekos, D.; Strawbridge, R.; Wykes, T.; Young, A.H.; Cella, M. Cognitive Remediation for People with Bipolar Disorder: The Contribution of Session Attendance and Therapy Components to Cognitive and Functional Outcomes. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2022, 152, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Trapp, W.; Heid, A.; Röder, S.; Wimmer, F.; Hajak, G. Cognitive Remediation in Psychiatric Disorders: State of the Evidence, Future Perspectives, and Some Bold Ideas. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vita, A.; Barlati, S.; Ceraso, A.; Nibbio, G.; Ariu, C.; Deste, G.; Wykes, T. Effectiveness, Core Elements, and Moderators of Response of Cognitive Remediation for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Psychiatry 2021, 78, 848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jahn, F.S.; Skovbye, M.; Obenhausen, K.; Jespersen, A.E.; Miskowiak, K.W. Cognitive Training with Fully Immersive Virtual Reality in Patients with Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Psychiatry Res. 2021, 300, 113928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Perra, A.; Riccardo, C.L.; De Lorenzo, V.; De Marco, E.; Di Natale, L.; Kurotschka, P.K.; Preti, A.; Carta, M.G. Fully Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Cognitive Remediation for Adults with Psychosocial Disabilities: A Systematic Scoping Review of Methods Intervention Gaps and Meta-Analysis of Published Effectiveness Studies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Freeman, D.; Reeve, S.; Robinson, A.; Ehlers, A.; Clark, D.; Spanlang, B.; Slater, M. Virtual Reality in the Assessment, Understanding, and Treatment of Mental Health Disorders. Psychol. Med. 2017, 47, 2393–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bruno, R.R.; Wolff, G.; Wernly, B.; Masyuk, M.; Piayda, K.; Leaver, S.; Erkens, R.; Oehler, D.; Afzal, S.; Heidari, H.; et al. Virtual and Augmented Reality in Critical Care Medicine: The Patient’s, Clinician’s, and Researcher’s Perspective. Crit. Care 2022, 26, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Demeco, A.; Zola, L.; Frizziero, A.; Martini, C.; Palumbo, A.; Foresti, R.; Buccino, G.; Costantino, C. Immersive Virtual Reality in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review. Sensors 2023, 23, 1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Riva, G.; Serino, S. Virtual Reality in the Assessment, Understanding and Treatment of Mental Health Disorders. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cortés-Pérez, I.; Sánchez-Alcalá, M.; Nieto-Escámez, F.A.; Castellote-Caballero, Y.; Obrero-Gaitán, E.; Osuna-Pérez, M.C. Virtual Reality-Based Therapy Improves Fatigue, Impact, and Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis. Sensors 2021, 21, 7389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Valmaggia, L.R.; Latif, L.; Kempton, M.J.; Rus-Calafell, M. Virtual Reality in the Psychological Treatment for Mental Health Problems: An Systematic Review of Recent Evidence. Psychiatry Res. 2016, 236, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Perra, A.; Galetti, A.; Zaccheddu, R.; Locci, A.; Piludu, F.; Preti, A.; Primavera, D.; Di Natale, L.; Nardi, A.E.; Kurotshka, P.K.; et al. A Recovery-Oriented Program for People with Bipolar Disorder through Virtual Reality-Based Cognitive Remediation: Results of a Feasibility Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Perra, A.; De Lorenzo, V.; Zaccheddu, R.; Locci, A.; Piludu, F.; Preti, A.; Di Natale, L.; Galetti, A.; Nardi, A.E.; Cossu, G.; et al. Cognitive Remediation Virtual Reality Tool a Recovery-Oriented Project for People with Bipolar Disorder: Protocol of a Feasibility Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin. Pract. Epidemiol. Ment. Health 2022, 18, e174501792208220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Eldridge, S.M.; Chan, C.L.; Campbell, M.J.; Bond, C.M.; Hopewell, S.; Thabane, L.; Lancaster, G.A. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Extension to Randomised Pilot and Feasibility Trials. BMJ 2016, 355, i5239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; American Psychiatric Association: Arlington, VA, USA, 2000; Volume IV. [Google Scholar]
  46. Skivington, K.; Matthews, L.; Simpson, S.A.; Craig, P.; Baird, J.; Blazeby, J.M.; Boyd, K.A.; Craig, N.; French, D.P.; McIntosh, E.; et al. A New Framework for Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: Update of Medical Research Council Guidance. BMJ 2021, 374, n2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gagnon Shaigetz, V.; Proulx, C.; Cabral, A.; Choudhury, N.; Hewko, M.; Kohlenberg, E.; Segado, M.; Smith, M.S.D.; Debergue, P. An Immersive and Interactive Platform for Cognitive Assessment and Rehabilitation (bWell): Design and Iterative Development Process. JMIR Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2021, 8, e26629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Saxena, S.; Funk, M.; Chisholm, D. World Health Assembly Adopts Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan 2013–2020. Lancet 2013, 381, 1970–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hoemann, K.; Feldman Barrett, L. Concepts Dissolve Artificial Boundaries in the Study of Emotion and Cognition, Uniting Body, Brain, and Mind. Cogn. Emot. 2019, 33, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Roncone, R.; Ussorio, D.; Salza, A.; Casacchia, M. Psychiatric Rehabilitation in Italy: Cinderella No More—The Contribution of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Technicians. Int. J. Ment. Health 2016, 45, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bagby, R.M.; Parker, J.D.A.; Taylor, G.J. The Twenty-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale—I. Item Selection and Cross-Validation of the Factor Structure. J. Psychosom. Res. 1994, 38, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Siegel, S.; John Castellan, N. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences; Social Sciences & World Languages; McGraw-Hill Humanities: New York, NY, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  53. Bressi, C.; Taylor, G.; Parker, J.; Bressi, S.; Brambilla, V.; Aguglia, E.; Allegranti, I.; Bongiorno, A.; Giberti, F.; Bucca, M.; et al. Cross Validation of the Factor Structure of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: An Italian Multicenter Study. J. Psychosom. Res. 1996, 41, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Duffy, A.; Grof, P. Longitudinal Studies of Bipolar Patients and Their Families: Translating Findings to Advance Individualized Risk Prediction, Treatment and Research. Int. J. Bipolar Disord. 2024, 12, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cho, C.-H.; Son, S.; Lee, Y.; Jeong, J.; Yeom, J.W.; Seo, J.Y.; Moon, E.; Baek, J.H.; Park, D.Y.; Kim, S.J.; et al. Identifying Predictive Factors for Mood Recurrence in Early-Onset Major Mood Disorders: A 4-Year, Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study. Psychiatry Res. 2024, 335, 115882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. O’Donnell, L.A.; Weintraub, M.J.; Ellis, A.J.; Axelson, D.A.; Kowatch, R.A.; Schneck, C.D.; Miklowitz, D.J. A Randomized Comparison of Two Psychosocial Interventions on Family Functioning in Adolescents with Bipolar Disorder. Fam. Process 2020, 59, 376–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Miklowitz, D.J.; Chung, B. Family-focused Therapy for Bipolar Disorder: Reflections on 30 Years of Research. Fam. Process 2016, 55, 483–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Miklowitz, D.J.; Schneck, C.D.; George, E.L.; Taylor, D.O.; Sugar, C.A.; Birmaher, B.; Kowatch, R.A.; DelBello, M.P.; Axelson, D.A. Pharmacotherapy and Family-Focused Treatment for Adolescents with Bipolar I and II Disorders: A 2-Year Randomized Trial. Am. J. Psychiatry 2014, 171, 658–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Morris, C.D.; Miklowitz, D.J.; Waxmonsky, J.A. Family-focused Treatment for Bipolar Disorder in Adults and Youth. J. Clin. Psychol. 2007, 63, 433–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kalcev, G.; Scano, A.; Orrù, G.; Primavera, D.; Cossu, G.; Nardi, A.E.; Carta, M.G. Is a Genetic Variant Associated with Bipolar Disorder Frequent in People without Bipolar Disorder but with Characteristics of Hyperactivity and Novelty Seeking? Clin. Pract. Epidemiol. Ment. Health 2023, 19, e174501792303280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kalcev, G.; Cossu, G.; Preti, A.; Littera, M.T.; Frau, S.; Primavera, D.; Zaccheddu, R.; Matza, V.; Ermellino, M.; Pintus, E.; et al. Development and Validation of the Questionnaire for Adaptive Hyperactivity and Goal Achievement (AHGA). Clin. Pract. Epidemiol. Ment. Health 2023, 19, e174501792303281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Carta, M.G.; Kalcev, G.; Scano, A.; Primavera, D.; Orrù, G.; Gureye, O.; Cossu, G.; Nardi, A.E. Is Bipolar Disorder the Consequence of a Genetic Weakness or Not Having Correctly Used a Potential Adaptive Condition? Brain Sci. 2022, 13, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Carta, M.G.; Kalcev, G.; Scano, A.; Pinna, S.; Gonzalez, C.I.A.; Nardi, A.E.; Orrù, G.; Primavera, D. Screening, Genetic Variants, and Bipolar Disorders: Can Useful Hypotheses Arise from the Sum of Partial Failures? Clin. Pract. 2023, 13, 853–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Carta, M.G.; Kalcev, G.; Fornaro, M.; Pinna, S.; Gonzalez, C.I.A.; Nardi, A.E.; Primavera, D. Does Screening for Bipolar Disorders Identify a “Dysregulation of Mood, Energy, and Social Rhythms Syndrome” (DYMERS)? A Heuristic Working Hypothesis. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 5162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Primavera, D.; Aviles Gonzalez, C.I.; Romano, F.; Kalcev, G.; Pinna, S.; Minerba, L.; Scano, A.; Orrù, G.; Cossu, G. Does the Response to a Stressful Condition in Older Adults with Life Rhythm Dysregulations Provide Evidence of the Existence of the “Dysregulation of Mood, Energy, and Social Rhythms Syndrome”? Healthcare 2023, 12, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Primavera, D.; Cossu, G.; Marchegiani, S.; Preti, A.; Nardi, A.E. Does the Dysregulation of Social Rhythms Syndrome (DYMERS) be Considered an Essential Component of Panic Disorders? Clin. Pract. 2024, 20, e17450179293272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Biazus, T.B.; Beraldi, G.H.; Tokeshi, L.; de Siqueira Rotenberg, L.; Dragioti, E.; Carvalho, A.F.; Solmi, M.; Lafer, B. All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality among People with Bipolar Disorder: A Large-Scale Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mol. Psychiatry 2023, 28, 2508–2524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Goldfarb, M.; De Hert, M.; Detraux, J.; Di Palo, K.; Munir, H.; Music, S.; Piña, I.; Ringen, P.A. Severe Mental Illness and Cardiovascular Disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2022, 80, 918–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. McIntyre, R.S.; Berk, M.; Brietzke, E.; Goldstein, B.I.; López-Jaramillo, C.; Kessing, L.V.; Malhi, G.S.; Nierenberg, A.A.; Rosenblat, J.D.; Majeed, A.; et al. Bipolar Disorders. Lancet 2020, 396, 1841–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vieta, E.; Berk, M.; Schulze, T.G.; Carvalho, A.F.; Suppes, T.; Calabrese, J.R.; Gao, K.; Miskowiak, K.W.; Grande, I. Bipolar Disorders. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018, 4, 18008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gibson, J. Trauma, Early Life Stress, and Mindfulness in Adulthood. BMC Psychol. 2024, 12, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Study sample and subgroups with chronic non psychiatric disease.
Table 1. Study sample and subgroups with chronic non psychiatric disease.
Experimental GroupControl GroupStatistics
Sex (female) 14 (64.1%)7 (72%)Chi square 1 df = 0.431; p = 0.512
Age 47.51 ± 13.5246.28 ± 13.40F 1.63 df = 0.127; p = 0.723
Subgroup with chronic diseases (Sex—female)15 (78.9%)8 (80%)Chi square Yates Correction 1 df = 0.001; p = 0.999
Subgroup with chronic diseases (age)52.26 ± 12.8949.8 ± 12.84
Table 2. Tas-20 global and sub-scales scores comparison within group by time (To vs. T1) with mean difference ± standard deviation and one way-repeated measures ANOVA (F, p value).
Table 2. Tas-20 global and sub-scales scores comparison within group by time (To vs. T1) with mean difference ± standard deviation and one way-repeated measures ANOVA (F, p value).
T0 Mean ± SDT1 Mean ± SDT0 × T1 Mean Difference ± SD
Tas GlobalEX (N = 39) 55.12 ± 14.5149.66 ± 14.87−5.46 ± 2.06
CC (N = 25) 52.08 ± 14.5255.76 ± 16.13+3.68 ± 2.36
F = 267.5; p < 0.00001
F1—Difficulty identifying feelingsEX (N = 39) 20.84 ± 7.2918.05 ± 8.43−2.27 ± 1.25
CC (N = 25) 19.87 ± 78.3720.44 ± 7.58+0.57 ± 0.98
F = 92.42; p < 0.00001
F2—Difficulty communicating feelings to othersEX (N = 39) 15.23 ± 4.7714.35 ± 4.74−0.88 ± 0.54
CC (N = 25) 14.56 ± 4.8515.00 ± 5.23+0.44 ± 0.81
F = 61.34; p < 0.00001
F3—Externally oriented thinkingEX (N = 39) 19.05 ± 5.8817.66 ± 4.69−1.39 ± 1.16
CC (N = 25) 17.72 ± 4.5020.32 ± 6.33+2.60 ± 1.22
F = 173.12; p < 0.00001
Table 3. Change in frequency from T0 to T1 of individuals with high alexithymia (Tas-20 score ≥ 60) by time and group.
Table 3. Change in frequency from T0 to T1 of individuals with high alexithymia (Tas-20 score ≥ 60) by time and group.
T0T1Analyis of Variance for Nominal Data p
Experimental group17/39 (43.5%)10/39 (25.6%)143.19p < 0.0001
Control group6/25 (24%)13/25 (52%)
Table 4. TAS-20 Subgroups with comorbid chronic diseases including cardiovascular.
Table 4. TAS-20 Subgroups with comorbid chronic diseases including cardiovascular.
T0T1T0×T1 Mean Difference ± SD
Experimental subgroup with chronic diseases T0 (N = 19) 55.57 ± 15.5856.47 ± 14.61−1.10 ± 2.01
Control subgroup with chronic diseases T0 (N = 10) 57.5 ± 14.4158.10 ± 15.27+0.60 ± 2.27
F = 4.293
p = 0.048
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sancassiani, F.; Perra, A.; Galetti, A.; Di Natale, L.; De Lorenzo, V.; Lorrai, S.; Kalcev, G.; Pintus, E.; Cantone, E.; Nonnis, M.; et al. Alexithymia and Bipolar Disorder: Virtual Reality Could Be a Useful Tool for the Treatment and Prevention of These Conditions in People with a Physical Comorbidity. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6206. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206206

AMA Style

Sancassiani F, Perra A, Galetti A, Di Natale L, De Lorenzo V, Lorrai S, Kalcev G, Pintus E, Cantone E, Nonnis M, et al. Alexithymia and Bipolar Disorder: Virtual Reality Could Be a Useful Tool for the Treatment and Prevention of These Conditions in People with a Physical Comorbidity. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(20):6206. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206206

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sancassiani, Federica, Alessandra Perra, Alessia Galetti, Lorenzo Di Natale, Valerio De Lorenzo, Stefano Lorrai, Goce Kalcev, Elisa Pintus, Elisa Cantone, Marcello Nonnis, and et al. 2024. "Alexithymia and Bipolar Disorder: Virtual Reality Could Be a Useful Tool for the Treatment and Prevention of These Conditions in People with a Physical Comorbidity" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 20: 6206. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206206

APA Style

Sancassiani, F., Perra, A., Galetti, A., Di Natale, L., De Lorenzo, V., Lorrai, S., Kalcev, G., Pintus, E., Cantone, E., Nonnis, M., Nardi, A. E., Montisci, R., & Primavera, D. (2024). Alexithymia and Bipolar Disorder: Virtual Reality Could Be a Useful Tool for the Treatment and Prevention of These Conditions in People with a Physical Comorbidity. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(20), 6206. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206206

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop