Next Article in Journal
Cervical Open-Door Laminoplasty for Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Correlation Between Spinal Canal Expansion and Clinical Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal
Ophthalmic Formulations for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis and Their Effect on the Ocular Surface: A Review of Safety and Tolerability Assessments in Clinical Trials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Pandoraea Infections in Humans—A Systematic Review

by
Afroditi Ziogou
1,
Alexios Giannakodimos
1,
Ilias Giannakodimos
2,
Andreas G. Tsantes
3 and
Petros Ioannou
4,*
1
Department of Medical Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, 18537 Piraeus, Greece
2
Department of Urology, Attikon University General Hospital of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
3
Laboratory of Hematology and Blood Bank Unit, School of Medicine, Attikon University General Hospital of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
4
School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(22), 6905; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226905
Submission received: 28 October 2024 / Revised: 10 November 2024 / Accepted: 14 November 2024 / Published: 16 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Pandoraea species are Gram-negative, aerobic, rod-shaped bacteria that belong to the Burkholderiaceae family and the Betaproteobacteria class. Despite their rare occurrence in the general population, they have been increasingly observed as the causes of infection in immunocompromised individuals or patients with severe comorbidities. The present review seeks to examine all documented cases of Pandoraea spp. infections in humans, focusing on data related to epidemiology, microbiology, antimicrobial susceptibility, treatment options, and mortality rates. Methods: A systematic review was conducted through a literature search of the PubMed/MedLine and Scopus databases. This review is subjected to certain limitations regarding the data accuracy or pathogen identification molecular techniques applied in the studies. Results: In total, 29 studies provided information on 43 patients with Pandoraea spp. infections. The mean age of the patients was 42 years, and 58% were male. Cystic fibrosis was these patients’ most prevalent risk factor (39.5%). The most frequently reported types of infection were lower respiratory tract infections (74.41%) and bacteremia (30.23%), followed by infective endocarditis, pancreatitis, upper respiratory tract infection, and osteomyelitis (4.65%). P. apista was the most regularly isolated species (37.2%), while antimicrobial resistance was lower for carbapenems, especially for imipenem (17.14%). The most commonly administered antibiotics included carbapenems (82%), cephalosporins, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (35.89%). The infection outcome primarily depended on the type of infection; mortality rates were high (30.23%) and particularly elevated for bloodstream infections. The protocol for this review was registered in Prospero (ID: CRD42024579385). Conclusions: Due to Pandoraea’s unique antimicrobial resistance pattern and capacity to induce severe infection, clinicians should include it when making a differential diagnosis, especially in patients with severe comorbidities and immunodeficiency.

1. Introduction

The discovery of new microorganisms has become increasingly common, resulting from genetic techniques like 16S rRNA gene sequencing [1]. These advanced methods offer greater accuracy in diagnosing infections caused by microorganisms that are difficult to detect using traditional microbiological approaches [2].
Pandoraea genus is an emerging Gram-negative, obligate aerobic, rod-shaped bacterium that belongs to the Burkholderiaceae family. This pathogen was initially described in 2000 to accommodate bacteria from Pseudomonas rRNA homology group II [3]. At present, eleven Pandoraea species have been described [4,5]. These pathogens may be isolated from various environmental sources and biological specimens, including respiratory tract, urine, or blood samples [6]. Although Pandoraea spp. are considered opportunistic pathogens, numerous cases of severe infection have been described, especially in patients with severe underlying conditions. This is attributed to the pathogens’ capacity to induce a pronounced pro-inflammatory response [7,8]. Most infections involve the respiratory tract and affect cystic fibrosis (CF) patients [9]. However, cases of Pandoraea bacteremia and even endocarditis or osteomyelitis have been reported in the literature [10,11]. Due to the challenges encountered in the pathogen’s detection and the phenotypic similarity with Ralstonia or Burkholderia species, these genera are often misidentified, leading to the underdiagnosis of Pandoraea infections globally [10]. Accurate identification necessitates advanced microbiological techniques, such as 16s rRNA gene sequencing [12]. Until today, there have been no officially established antibiotic susceptibility breakpoints for Pandoraea spp.; these pathogens are considered multi-drug-resistant, and most present high resistance to β lactams and aminoglycosides. Identifying these peculiar resistance patterns is essential for immediate infection control [3]. There are no established treatment guidelines for Pandoraea infections; most cases are empirically treated while the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing are pending. The difficulty in establishing treatment guidelines and applying empirical treatment may derive from the limited number of published studies globally. The mortality rates for these infections are relatively high, with outcomes largely influenced by the infection site and the patient’s underlying health conditions.
The main objective of this study was to review all published cases of Pandoraea spp. infections in humans, focusing on epidemiology and mortality data. Additionally, it aims to describe the microbiology, antimicrobial susceptibility, and treatment of these infections, address existing areas of uncertainty, including risk factors and treatment options, and expand the limited information available in the literature on this emerging microorganism.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy and Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The present systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) and Meta-Analyses guidelines [13]. The protocol was registered in Prospero (ID: CRD42024579385). Information on Pandoraea species-related human infections was extracted and gathered from the existing literature. The principal objective was to analyze these infections’ mortality rates and epidemiology data. Additionally, the secondary goals included demonstrating information on the specific infection sites, providing thorough clinical profiles of all affected patients, microbiological data, and treatment regimens administered to individuals affected with Pandoraea spp. infections. For this review, two investigators (A.Z. and A.G.) independently searched PubMed/Medline and Scopus databases for potential articles reporting on all Pandoraea spp. infections until 25 September 2024, using a pre-defined template. The following keywords were used for the search strategy: “Pandoraea” AND (“infection” OR “bacteremia” OR “endocarditis” OR “peritonitis” OR “pneumonia” OR “osteomyelitis”). Any occurring dispute was resolved by a senior investigator’s (P.I.) intervention. The inclusion criteria for the present review consisted of studies presenting original data, such as case series, case reports, and cohort studies that provided information on the epidemiology and clinical outcomes of Pandoraea spp. infections in humans. Only studies published in English were included to optimally comprehend all clinical details. Reviews and systematic reviews with aggregated data were not considered. Animal studies and articles that lacked full-text access or did not provide sufficient data on patient mortality and epidemiology were also excluded. To ensure comprehensive coverage, the references of all included articles were reviewed to detect any studies that may have been missed in the initial search.

2.2. Data Extraction and Definitions

The following data were collected from each included article: publication year, type of article, country of origin, patients’ demographics (age, gender), patients’ pertinent medical history, data on infection, and relevant microbiological features, such as exact infection site, complications, and identified pathogen and antibiotic resistance, as well as treatment options and clinical outcome (survival or mortality). The correlation between mortality and the initial infection was documented as per the authors of each study. The exclusion of studies in languages other than English may potentially lead to a sample bias; however, the number of these articles was small.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were applied for numerical variables, presenting mean values with their corresponding standard deviations (SDs) or medians with interquartile ranges (25–75%) in a skewed data distribution. Categorical variables were exhibited by frequencies and percentages to provide a detailed overview. Patients included in the case series were considered individual case reports to facilitate the evaluation of variables of interest.
A univariate linear regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with patients’ overall mortality. Given the small number of values provided for most patients’ characteristics, the small clinical relevance of some of them, and the small number of patients included in the present analysis, only gender, age, history of cystic fibrosis, previous use of antimicrobials, bloodstream infection, fever, and sepsis were included in the univariate linear analysis. Statistics were calculated with GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). A multivariate logistic regression analysis evaluated the effect of factors previously identified in the univariate analysis model associated with all-cause mortality with a p < 0.1. Multivariate analysis was performed using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Included Studies’ Characteristics

The literature search of the PubMed and Scopus databases retrieved 362 non-duplicate studies. After record screening and a snowball procedure, 29 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. These 29 studies provided data on 43 patients. A flow diagram of the selection process is depicted in Figure 1. Among them, ten studies were conducted in Europe, eight in Asia, eight in North and South America, and three in Oceania. There were 26 case reports, 2 case series, and 1 letter to the editor [6,8,9,10,11,12,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Table S1 shows the main characteristics of the studies. Figure 2 shows the geographical distribution of the cases.

3.2. Epidemiology of Pandoraea spp. Infections in General

The mean age of the patients with Pandoraea infection was 42.08 years, ranging from 1.5 to 79 years, while 58.14% (25 out of 43) were male. In regard to the patients’ medical history, 17 patients (39.5%) were diagnosed with cystic fibrosis, and 15 patients (34.88%) were administered antibiotics in the previous three months. Additionally, eight patients (18.6%) were immunosuppressed, seven individuals (16.27%) had a history of active malignancy, and among them, five patients (11.62%) were diagnosed with hematologic malignancies. Of note, recent organ transplantation and the presence of a central venous catheter (CVC) were documented in five individuals (11.62%), while severe trauma was noted in four patients (9.3%). The characteristics of the patients with Pandoraea species infection are presented in Table 1.

3.3. Microbiology and Antimicrobial Resistance of Pandoraea Infections in General

Pandoraea spp. were isolated from tracheobronchial secretion or sputum cultures in 29 patients (67.44%), blood cultures in 9 patients (20.93%), and CVC cultures in 1 patient (2.32%); of note, in 1 patient (2.32%) the pathogen was detected in a lung biopsy, in another patient (2.32%), in the peritoneal fluid and, in 1 patient (2.32%), in bone culture. Pandoraea apista was the most commonly identified species (37.2%); other detected species included Pandoraea commovens in 10 patients (23.25%), Pandoraea sputorum in 8 patients (18.6%), Pandoraea pnomenusa in 6 patients (13.95%), and Pandoraea pulmonicola in 3 patients (6.97%). A few rare species, including Pandoraea nosoerga, Pandoraea vervacti, and Pandoraea oxalalivorans, were also identified. The infection was polymicrobial in 23 individuals (53.48%); the most frequently co-isolated pathogen was Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 16 patients (37.2%), while Candida was present in 6 patients (13.95%). Of note, one patient (2.32%) was found positive for SARS-CoV-19. The identification of the pathogen was achieved through genetic testing, particularly using 16s-rRNA sequencing in 11 individuals (25.58%) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in 24 patients (55.81%).
Concerning antimicrobial resistance, disk diffusion was the most common method applied in 18 patients (41.86%). Antimicrobial resistance was high for Penicillin, Aztreonam, Macrolides, Chloramphenicol, Aminoglycosides, Piperacillin, Quinolones, and Cephalosporins. The antimicrobial resistance rates are depicted in Table 2.

3.4. Clinical Presentation of Pandoraea Infections

The most frequently observed Pandoraea infection site was the lower respiratory system in 32 patients (74.41%), followed by bloodstream infection in 13 patients (30.23%). Upper respiratory infection, osteomyelitis, pancreatitis, and endocarditis were noted in two patients (4.65%), while infections of the liver and skin were reported in one patient, respectively (2.32%). Based on the available data, the duration of symptoms varied between 0 days (acute onset of infection) and 180 days. Interestingly, 42.85% (12 out of 28 patients) presented symptoms of the infections intermittently for several years, ranging from 1.5 to 11 years.

3.5. Treatment and Outcomes of Pandoraea Infections

Concerning antimicrobial treatment, 69.23% of the included patients received antibiotics (27 out of 39 with the available data). The most frequently administered antibiotics were carbapenems at 82.05% (32 out of 39 patients) and cephalosporins and Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole at 35.89% (14 patients). Additionally, aminoglycosides were used in 28.2% (11 patients), quinolones in 25.64% (10 patients), macrolides in 23.07% (9 patients), and tetracyclines in 20.51% (8 patients). Other less common antibiotics used included rifampicin and piperacillin/tazobactam in 17.94% (seven patients), colistin and tigecycline in 12.82% (five patients), vancomycin in 10.25% (four patients), aminopenicillins in 5.12% (two patients), sulbactam, aztreonam, daptomycin, linezolid, and hydroxychloroquine in 2.56% (one patient). Notably, only 2.43% (1 out of 41 patients based on the available data) did not receive antibiotics. Operative interventions were conducted along with antimicrobial treatment in 16.6% (7 out of 42 patients), while 7.14% (3 out of 42 patients) underwent surgical procedures without antibiotic administration. The median duration of treatment for the survivors was 13 days. The overall mortality rate was 30.23% (13 out of 43 patients), while the mortality rate attributed specifically to Pandoraea infection was 20.93% (9 patients). The total characteristics of the different types of Pandoraea species infections are depicted in Table 3.

3.6. Respiratory Infection Due to Pandoraea

Thirty-two patients who developed upper and lower respiratory infections due to Pandoraea spp. were identified. The mean age of these patients was 38.07 years, ranging from 1.5 to 75 years, and 53.12% (17 out of 32 patients) were male. Among these patients, 53.12% (17 out of 32) had been diagnosed with cystic fibrosis, 37.5% (12 patients) had been administered antibiotics in the previous three months, 18.75% (6 patients) were immunosuppressed, and 12.5% (4 patients) presented with active malignancy; in 75% (three out of four) of this patient group, the malignancy was hematologic and only one patient (25%) was on chemotherapy. Of note, 12.5% (four patients) had been subjected to organ transplantation; lung transplantation was conducted on three of these individuals. Finally, neutropenia and a CVC were present in 6.25% (two patients). In most patients (62.5%), the infection was polymicrobial; Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequently isolated pathogen (50%). Respiratory failure was observed in 87.5% (28 patients). Sepsis and septic shock were reported in 31.25% (eight patients) and 15.62% (five patients), respectively. Heart failure and need for hemodialysis were noted in 9.37% (three patients). The mean duration of treatment for patients with respiratory infections due to Pandoraea was 30.23 days. Antibiotics were used in the majority of patients (93.75%), surgical interventions were conducted in 18.75% (six patients), while in 12.5% (four patients) both antibiotics and surgical procedures were applied. The overall mortality was 31.25% (10 patients), and mortality directly associated with Pandoraea infection was 21.87% (7 patients).

3.7. Bacteremia Due to Pandoraea

Bacteremia was detected in thirteen patients. The mean age of this patient group was 45.85 years, varying from 16 to 79 years, and 76.92% (10 patients) were males. Previous antibiotic administration during the last three months, immunosuppression, the presence of a CVC line, and organ transplantation were recorded in 30.76% (four patients). Active malignancy and a history of surgery in the last three months were noted in 23.07% (three patients), and a history of cystic fibrosis was noted in 15.38% (two patients), while end-stage renal disease, a history of rheumatic fever, intravenous drug use, and autoimmune syndrome in 7.7% (one patient) were noted. Polymicrobial infection was observed in 23.07% (three patients); Clostridium perfingens, Staphylococcus spp., Candida spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were isolated along with Pandoraea spp. from these individuals. Among all the cases with bacteremia, 76.92% (10 patients) developed fever, 46.15% (6 patients) sepsis, and 30.76% (4 patients) septic shock. Organ failure occurred in 46.15% (six patients); 83.33 (five out of six patients) presented with respiratory failure, while 33.3% (two patients) presented with heart and kidney failure, respectively. Hemodialysis was required for all the patients who presented with kidney insufficiency. Finally, 16.6% (one patient) developed liver insufficiency. The mean duration of treatment was 30.6 days. Antibiotics were applied to 84.61% of patients (11), a surgical approach was used in 30.7% (4), and both methods were used in 23.07% (3). The overall mortality was estimated at 38.46% (five patients), and mortality was caused specifically by Pandoraea spp. in 30.76% (four patients).

3.8. Infective Endocarditis Due to Pandoraea

In the present systematic review, 4.65% (2 out of 43 patients) developed infective endocarditis caused by Pandoraea spp. The mean age was 39.5 years, and 100% of cases were males. All patients (100%) had prosthetic cardiac valves. One patient was an intravenous drug user, had a CVC, underwent cardiac surgery, and received antibiotics within the previous three months. The second patient had a metallic valve and presented rheumatic fever. In both patients (100%), P. pnomenusa was the only identified pathogen. The infection was community-acquired in 50% (one patient), while in 50%, it was hospital-acquired. The diagnosis was established by applying Duke’s criteria in both patients (100%) and transesophageal or transthoracic ultrasound (50%, respectively). Fever was present in both cases (100%); however, septic shock, multiple organ failure, and the need for hemodialysis occurred in one patient (50%). None of the patients exhibited immunologic or embolic complications. The mean treatment duration was 28 days. All patients (100%) received antibiotics; one (50%) underwent CVC removal and replacement. The overall mortality was 50% (one patient), and Pandoraea-specific mortality was also 50% (one patient).

3.9. Osteomyelitis Due to Pandoraea

Osteomyelitis was recorded in 4.65% (2 out of 43 patients). The mean age was 61 years, and 100% were males. Risk factors were present only in one patient and included immunosuppression due to hematologic malignancy accompanied by neutropenia and recent antibiotic use; lower respiratory infection was also present in this patient. P. apista and P. commovens were identified in these two patients. In the first patient, osteomyelitis was located in the skull, leading to hearing loss. The second patient presented with mediastinitis complicated with sepsis and respiratory failure. Both patients received antibiotics, specifically quinolones (50%) and carbapenems (50%). Surgical interventions were not performed. The overall mortality was 50% (one patient), although no deaths were attributed to Pandoraea spp.

3.10. Other Infections Due to Pandoraea

Pancreatic infections were detected 4.65% (2 out of 43 cases). The mean age of the patients was 56 years, and 50% were male (one patient). One patient was recently subjected to ERCP that caused pancreatitis, while the second patient had a medical history of diabetes mellitus-associated chronic kidney disease. P. commovens was isolated after an intra-abdominal puncture in both patients. All patients (100%) needed hemodialysis and intensive care, while one (50%) was reported to have respiratory failure. All patients received antibiotics and underwent surgical interventions. The overall mortality was 50%, but no deaths were caused by Pandoraea infection.
Skin infection was reported in 2.32% (1 out of 43 patients). The patient was a 46-year-old woman with severe burns. Bacteremia was also present. Several Pandoraea species were identified, such as P. sputorum, P. vervacti, and P.oxalalivorans. The patient developed septic shock and needed intensive care. The survival rate was 100%.

3.11. Results of the Statistical Analysis

A univariate linear regression analysis of the overall mortality with gender, age, history of cystic fibrosis, previous use of antimicrobials, bloodstream infection, fever, and sepsis was performed, and fever and sepsis were identified as being positively associated with the overall mortality (p = 0.0143 and p = 0.0017, respectively). A multivariate logistic regression analysis, after including those two parameters (the only ones with a p < 0.1 in the univariate analysis), did not identify any factor to be independently associated with the overall mortality. Table 4 shows the regression analysis of the overall mortality in Listeria IE patients.

4. Discussion

The present systematic review highlights the characteristics of infections caused by Pandoraea species, drawn from various studies that offer detailed insights into epidemiology, microbiology, clinical presentations, treatment, and clinical outcomes. The most frequently reported infections were respiratory, bacteremia, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, pancreatitis, and skin and liver infections. Among the Pandoraea species, Pandoraea apista was the most commonly identified. Carbapenems emerged as the most widely utilized antimicrobial agent in treatment. This review also underlines that the overall mortality from Pandoraea infections was relatively high.
Due to the limited number of cases reported on Pandoraea spp. infections in the current literature, establishing precise epidemiological data for these infections remains challenging [19]. In this systematic review, most cases were male, and the mean age was 42.08 years. Intriguingly, most cases were detected in European countries, while only 27.58% were observed in Asia and North or South America. Only 10.34% were noted in Oceania. The higher prevalence in Europe may be attributed to better surveillance systems or a relatively larger number of individuals with CF [36]. The low prevalence in Asian countries and the lack of reported cases in Africa reduces the possibility of an association between Pandoraea infection and poor living conditions. However, the limited number of published studies and the elevated misdiagnosis rates globally impede the establishment of solid epidemiological conclusions regarding Pandoraea infections.
The Pandoraea genus currently includes 28 formally recorded taxa, a figure that is constantly increasing [37,38]. It belongs to the Burkholderiaceae family and the Betaproteobacteria class [10,24]. Eleven species have been described, including Pandoraea apista, P. norimbergensis, P. pulmonicola, P. sputorum, and P. pnomenusa [39]. The pathogen is a Gram-negative, obligate aerobic, rod-shaped bacterium that shows oxidase variability, with around 64% being oxidase-positive. It is non-lactose-fermenting, motile thanks to a single polar flagellum, urea-positive, indole-negative, capable of growth at 42 °C on cetrimide and Burkholderia cepacia-selective media, but unable to grow on acetamide [3,9]. It has been retrieved from environmental sources, respiratory secretions, blood cultures, urine samples, and wounds [9,40]. Pandoraea infections were initially considered nosocomial and frequently isolated from patients on long-term ventilation [3]. Pandoraea is frequently misidentified as Ralstonia or Burkholderia species, as these two genera are strongly related to Pandoraea spp. phylogenetically and phenotypically [10]. The microorganism generally exhibits low invasive potential; however, cases with systemic infection and severe complications, such as sepsis, have occasionally been described [10,39].
Regarding potential predisposing risk factors, a history of cystic fibrosis was the most prevalent, according to the results of this systematic review. Cystic fibrosis constitutes a genetic disorder that provokes the accumulation of thick mucus in several organs, particularly the lungs; respiratory failure remains the principal cause of morbidity and mortality in CF patients [41]. This condition facilitates bacterial proliferation and severe respiratory infection. Non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria are the most commonly isolated pathogens known to colonize the lungs [42]. However, several opportunistic pathogens invade the CF lungs through the years, often resulting in chronic infection with P. aeruginosa and, secondly, with Burkholderia cepacian complex (Bcc). Numerous opportunistic pathogens may also be isolated, including Enterobacteriaceae or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [42,43]. Pandoraea spp. has recently been associated with CF as a newly emerging and multi-drug-resistant bacteria [19,44]. Pandoraea, and especially P.pulmonicola and P. pnomenusa, are capable of biofilm formation; this increases the pathogen’s virulence in patients with cystic fibrosis [45,46]. Moreover, most CF patients in this study had received antibiotics within the last three months. In most cases, the infection was polymicrobial, with P. aeruginosa being the most frequently isolated pathogen, potentially contributing to the severity of the clinical manifestations. To date, little data regarding Pandoraea species’ pathogenicity, mechanisms of drug resistance, and effect on CF lung are available; thus, more studies are required to elucidate their exact role in CF [19].
Another important risk factor observed in patients with Pandoraea infections was immunosuppression; active malignancy, either solid or hematologic, chemotherapy administration, autoimmune syndromes, and organ transplantation were observed in several cases. In most cases included in this review, antibiotics were repeatedly administered within the three months prior to infection. The repeated systematic use of antibiotics may cause microorganism selection and foster types of rare pathogen infections. Moreover, in patients with immunodeficiency, the asymptomatic colonization of the respiratory tract and other organs with Pandoraea is a high possibility; the development of systemic infection depends on the pathogens’ invasive potential [21]. Moreover, patients subjected to organ transplantation also receive intense immunosuppressive treatment; therefore, the proliferation of opportunistic pathogens is facilitated due to decreased immunity [47,48]. In this review, three patients underwent lung transplantation, two patients underwent liver transplantation, and one patient underwent allogenic stem cell transplantation due to hematologic malignancy. The use of CVC lines may also predispose to infection, especially in patients with bacteremia. CVCs provide entry points for pathogens into the bloodstream and enable bacterial attachment to the silicone tubing. Biofilm formation, observed in particular Pandoraea species, promotes bacterial proliferation and antimicrobial resistance [49]. In the present review, most patients with a CVC presented with bacteremia.
The identification of Pandoraea spp. remains challenging since most microbiology laboratories have limited access to advanced molecular methods, such as genetic testing. The detection of non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli can be difficult, partly due to the exclusion of certain taxa from the databases of most commercial systems and partly because some species are non-reactive or exhibit slow growth [50]. Moreover, misidentification with Ralstonia or Burkholderia species is frequent, given their overlapping phenotypes [10]. High clinical and microbiological suspicions are essential for prompt identification. One key point in detecting the pathogen is the peculiar pattern of antimicrobial resistance to carbapenems, a distinctive characteristic of most Pandoraea species. Susceptibility tests have revealed significant multi-drug resistance as well as an exclusive pattern of carbapenem resistance: susceptibility to imipenem and resistance to meropenem [10,39]. Advanced microbiological procedures, such as 16s rRNA or matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), are generally necessary for more precise identification. In the present review, MALDI-TOF was the most common method used for pathogen identification, followed by 16s rRNA. In several cases, both methods were applied to successfully identify the pathogen. A study by Martina et al. demonstrated that a combination of 16s rRNA and mass spectrometry successfully detected P. sputorum infection that was initially misdiagnosed [12]. However, given these techniques’ high cost and low availability, successful diagnosis should also rely on specific pathogen biochemical or cultural features. In a study by Jorgensen et al., pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used to conduct an epidemiological analysis of P. apista isolates [9]. PFGE is considered one of the optimal methods for epidemiological studies. However, it is laborious and time-consuming; as a result, considerable effort has been made to design techniques incorporating PCR [16]. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have advanced rapidly in recent years and offer the potential to detect pathogens by recognizing small amounts of DNA or RNA sequences at a reduced cost [51]. While NGS could serve as a diagnostic tool for the rapid and precise identification of Pandoarea spp., its specific role in diagnosing this pathogen has not yet been documented in the literature. Additional studies are needed to gather relevant data.
Until today, there have been no official or widely established antibiotic susceptibility breakpoints for Pandoraea spp., as no formal studies have evaluated the susceptibility profile of this species. As a result, the data in this review are based on case reports that include information on the pathogen’s antimicrobial susceptibility. Treatment should be carefully considered given the pathogen’s peculiar resistance patterns; Pandoraea spp. is considered multi-drug-resistant, and most species are resistant to β lactams and aminoglycosides [15]. A possible explanation for multi-drug resistance is the germ’s production of certain enzymes and efflux pumps. Specifically, oxacillinase-62 plays an important role against imipenem resistance [22]. Moreover, resistance may be attributed to chronic antibiotic administration in CF patients [3]. Since no definitive explanation has been provided regarding the pathogens’ resistance pattern, more thorough investigations regarding these resistance mechanisms and establishing specific criteria for interpreting sensitivity assays remain essential.
In cases of systemic infection, aggressive antimicrobial treatment is indicated to prevent a fatal outcome [15]. According to the data in the present systematic review, carbapenems, especially imipenem, could be the optimal treatment for severe Pandoraea infection; in most cases, the pathogens were susceptible to imipenem. Cephalosporins and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were also commonly administered amongst Pandoraea-infected patients, followed by aminoglycosides and quinolones. Antibiotic therapy should rely on actual in vitro susceptibility testing, considering the pathogen’s resistance pattern [39]. The treatment duration depends on the infection site and the symptoms’ severity; in this review, the duration ranged from 14 days to more than three months for severe complications, such as respiratory failure [9]. Surgical procedures were conducted in complicated cases, mainly consisting of CVC removal and replacement and lung transplantation, in cases with respiratory failure [15,16]. The mortality rate of Pandoraea infections was relatively high, especially in patients with cystic fibrosis or cases complicated by respiratory or multi-organ failure. High mortality rates may result from delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis with other similar bacteria. The pathogen’s ability to produce serious infections, difficulty accessing suitable diagnostic tools, and unique resistance may also lead to elevated mortality rates [14,15].
This study is subject to certain limitations. The literature search may not have captured all the relevant studies on epidemiology and mortality, and the search strategy could have resulted in some studies being overlooked. Our analysis focused solely on case reports and case series, which rely on accurate record-keeping to maintain credibility. The exclusion of studies in languages other than English may potentially lead to a sample bias; however, the number of these articles was low. Additionally, in many studies, molecular identification methods such as 16s rRNA sequencing or MALDI-TOF MS were not utilized, raising the possibility of misidentification in some cases. Furthermore, some studies had incomplete data, limiting the scope of our statistical analysis to the available information. As a result, we could only present findings based on studies that provided complete data.

5. Conclusions

This study offers insights into the epidemiology, clinical features, microbiology, antimicrobial susceptibility, treatment, and outcomes of Pandoraea infections, highlighting key information on the pathogenic potential of this microorganism. P. apista was the most commonly identified species, while the respiratory system was the most frequently affected. Peculiar antimicrobial resistance patterns were observed, with resistance to meropenem and susceptibility to imipenem. Despite the lack of validated therapeutic guidelines, carbapenems were the most widely administered antibiotics. The site of infection affects patients’ outcomes, with its clinical severity closely linked to the patient’s immune status. Due to Pandoraea’s unique antimicrobial resistance pattern and capacity to induce severe infection, caution is advised when a pathogen cannot be definitively identified as either B. cepacia complex or Ralstonia species, and antibiotic treatment should be guided by actual in vitro susceptibility testing. Although the present review encompasses certain limitations, it may inspire further longitudinal investigations and controlled studies that will elucidate on Pandoraea infections and offer essential information on treatment strategies in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm13226905/s1: Table S1: Characteristics of included studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.I.; methodology, A.Z., A.G., I.G., P.I. and A.G.T.; software, A.Z.; validation, I.G., A.G. and A.G.T.; formal analysis, A.Z. and P.I.; investigation, A.Z., A.G. and I.G.; resources, A.Z. and P.I.; data curation, A.G.T.; writing—original draft preparation, A.Z., A.G. and I.G.; writing—review and editing, A.G.T. and P.I.; visualization, A.Z.; supervision, P.I.; project administration, P.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Woo, P.C.; Lau, S.K.; Teng, J.L.; Tse, H.; Yuen, K.Y. Then and now: Use of 16S rDNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification and discovery of novel bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratories. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008, 14, 908–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chen, H.; Li, J.; Yan, S.; Sun, H.; Tan, C.; Liu, M.; Liu, K.; Zhang, H.; Zou, M.; Xiao, X. Identification of pathogen(s) in infectious diseases using shotgun metagenomic sequencing and conventional culture: A comparative study. PeerJ 2021, 9, e11699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  3. Coenye, T.; Falsen, E.; Hoste, B.; Ohlén, M.; Goris, J.; Govan, J.R.; Gillis, M.; Vandamme, P. Description of Pandoraea gen. nov.with Pandoraea apista sp. nov., Pandoraea pulmonicola sp. nov., Pandoraea pnomenusa sp. nov., Pandoraea sputorum sp. nov. and Pandoraea norimbergensis comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2000, 50 Pt 2, 887–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Green, H.; Jones, A.M. Emerging Gram-negative bacteria: Pathogenic or innocent bystanders. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2018, 24, 592–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. See-Too, W.S.; Ambrose, M.; Malley, R.; Ee, R.; Mulcahy, E.; Manche, E.; Lazenby, J.; McEwan, B.; Pagnon, J.; Chen, J.W.; et al. Pandoraea fibrosis sp. nov., a novel Pandoraea species isolated from clinical respiratory samples. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Xiao, X.; Tian, H.; Cheng, X.; Li, G.; Zhou, J.; Peng, Z.; Li, Y. Pandoraea sputorum Bacteremia In A Patient Who Had Undergone Allogeneic Liver Transplantation Plus Immunosuppressive Therapy: A Case Report. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 3359–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  7. Degand, N.; Lotte, R.; Decondé Le Butor, C.; Segonds, C.; Thouverez, M.; Ferroni, A.; Vallier, C.; Mély, L.; Carrère, J. Epidemic spread of Pandoraea pulmonicola in a cystic fibrosis center. BMC Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  8. Kokcha, S.; Bittar, F.; Reynaud-Gaubert, M.; Mely, L.; Gomez, C.; Gaubert, J.Y.; Thomas, P.; Rolain, J.M. Pandoraea pulmonicola chronic colonization in a cystic fibrosis patient, France. New Microbes New Infect. 2013, 1, 27–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  9. Jørgensen, I.M.; Johansen, H.K.; Frederiksen, B.; Pressler, T.; Hansen, A.; Vandamme, P.; Høiby, N.; Koch, C. Epidemic spread of Pandoraea apista, a new pathogen causing severe lung disease in cystic fibrosis patients. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2003, 36, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Stryjewski, M.E.; LiPuma, J.J.; Messier, R.H., Jr.; Reller, L.B.; Alexander, B.D. Sepsis, multiple organ failure, and death due to Pandoraea pnomenusa infection after lung transplantation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 2255–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  11. Patil, N.R.; Tripathi, M.; Charaya, K.; Angrup, A.; Ahuja, C.; Mohindra, S. Skull base osteomyelitis by Pandoraea apista: An unusual pathogen at unusual location—A case report. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2021, 12, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  12. Martina, P.F.; Martínez, M.; Frada, G.; Alvarez, F.; Leguizamón, L.; Prieto, C.; Barrias, C.; Bettiol, M.; Lagares, A.; Bosch, A.; et al. First time identification of Pandoraea sputorum from a patient with cystic fibrosis in Argentina: A case report. BMC Pulm. Med. 2017, 17, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  13. Page, M.J.; Moher, D.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Moore, J.E.; Reid, A.; Millar, B.C.; Jiru, X.; Mccaughan, J.; Goldsmith, C.E.; Collins, J.; Murphy, P.G.; Elborn, J.S. Pandoraea apista isolated from a patient with cystic fibrosis: Problems associated with laboratory identification. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 2002, 59, 164–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Johnson, L.N.; Han, J.Y.; Moskowitz, S.M.; Burns, J.L.; Qin, X.; Englund, J.A. Pandoraea bacteremia in a cystic fibrosis patient with associated systemic illness. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2004, 23, 881–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Atkinson, R.M.; Lipuma, J.J.; Rosenbluth, D.B.; Dunne, W.M., Jr. Chronic colonization with Pandoraea apista in cystic fibrosis patients determined by repetitive-element-sequence, PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 833–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  17. Pimentel, J.D.; MacLeod, C. Misidentification of Pandoraea sputorum isolated from sputum of a patient with cystic fibrosis and review of Pandoraea species infections in transplant patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 3165–3168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  18. Fernández-Olmos, A.; Morosini, M.I.; Lamas, A.; García-Castillo, M.; García-García, L.; Cantón, R.; Máiz, L. Clinical and microbiological features of a cystic fibrosis patient chronically colonized with Pandoraea sputorum identified by combining 16S rRNA sequencing and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 1096–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  19. Pugès, M.; Debelleix, S.; Fayon, M.; Mégraud, F.; Lehours, P. Persistent Infection Because of Pandoraea sputorum in a Young Cystic Fibrosis Patient Resistant to Antimicrobial Treatment. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2015, 34, 1135–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ambrose, M.; Malley, R.C.; Warren, S.J.; Beggs, S.A.; Swallow, O.F.; McEwan, B.; Stock, D.; Roddam, L.F. Pandoraea pnomenusa Isolated from an Australian Patient with Cystic Fibrosis. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  21. Monzón, T.; Valga, F.; Reichert, J.; López, C. Hemodialysis catheter colonized by Pandoraea spotorum. Nefrologia (Engl. Ed). 2018, 38, 662–664, (In English, Spanish). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lin, C.; Luo, N.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Cai, M.; Zheng, G.; Yang, P. Pneumonia due to Pandoraea apista after evacuation of traumatic intracranial hematomas:a case report and literature review. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  23. Boutin, C.A.; Cornut, G.; Bilik Pinto, V.; GrandjeanLapierre, S. Pandoraea sp. infection in a lung transplant patient and the critical role of MALDI-TOF in accurate bacterial identification. J. Assoc. Med. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Can. 2020, 5, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  24. Gawalkar, A.A.; Kasinadhuni, G.; Kanaujia, R.; Rajan, P.; Vijay, J.; Revaiah, P.C.; Ray, P.; Vijayvergiya, R. Prosthetic aortic valve dehiscence following infective endocarditis by a rare bacterium—Pandoraea pnomenusa. J. Cardiol. Cases 2020, 24, 27–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  25. Peyclit, L.; Baron, S.A.; Reynaud-Gaubert, M.; Cassir, N.; Rolain, J.M. Fatal Pandoraea nosoerga infection after combined liver-lung transplantation for cystic fibrosis: A recontamination by the pre-transplantation strain. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 40, 2403–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dlewati, M.M.; Aung, P.P.; Park, K.; Rodriguez, J.A.; Poon, K.K. Meropenem-Resistant Pandoraea Pneumonia in a Critically Ill Patient With COVID-19. Cureus 2021, 13, e19498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  27. Bodendoerfer, E.; Personnic, N.; Mestres, C.A.; Wilhelm, M.J.; Meyer, L.; Hasse, B. Possible Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis by Pandoraea pnomenusa and Specific Virulence Mechanisms. Infect. Drug Resist. 2021, 14, 1319–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  28. Singh, S.; Sahu, C.; Patel, S.S.; Garg, A.; Ghoshal, U. Pandoraea apista Bacteremia in a COVID-Positive Man: A Rare Coinfection Case Report from North India. J. Lab. Physicians 2021, 13, 192–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  29. Ma, Z.; Zou, X.; Lin, J.; Zhang, C.; Xiao, S. Sepsis Due to Pandoraea sputorum Infection After Multiple Trauma in a Non-Cystic Fibrosis Patient: A Case Report from Southeast China. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 7043–7052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  30. Itoh, N.; Akazawa, N.; Ishibana, Y.; Masuishi, T.; Nakata, A.; Murakami, H. Clinical and microbiological features of obstructive cholangitis with bloodstream infection caused by Pandoraea apista identified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and ribosomal RNA sequencing in a cancer patient. BMC Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  31. Cubides-Diaz, D.A.; Muñoz Angulo, N.; Martin Arsanios, D.A.; Ovalle Monroy, A.L.; Perdomo-Rodriguez, D.R.; Del-Portillo, M.P. Pandoraea pnomenusa Superinfection in a Patient with SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia: First Case in the Literature. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2022, 14, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  32. Ramos Oliveira, S.; Costa Monteiro, I.; Rodrigues, C.; Soares, M.J. Fever in a Patient with a Central Venous Catheter Colonized by Pandoraea pnomenusa. Acta Medica Port. 2023, 36, 127–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Zheng, J.; Ma, C.; Xing, B.; Li, T. Green inclusions in peripheral blood neutrophils of a patient with Pandoraea apista bacteraemia. Br. J. Haematol. 2023, 200, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kim, M.E.; Goldstein, S.L.; Chlebowski, M.M. Recombinant angiotensin II therapy in a child with cardiac dysfunction and Pandoraea and Candida sepsis. Cardiol. Young 2023, 33, 2393–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kruis, T.; Menzel, P.; Schwarzer, R.; Wiesener, S.; Schoenrath, F.; Klefisch, F.; Stegemann, M.; Pfäfflin, F. Outbreak of Pandoraea commovens Infections among Non-Cystic Fibrosis Intensive Care Patients, Germany, 2019–2021. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2023, 29, 2229–2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  36. Tabatabaei, M.; Dastbarsar, M.; Moslehi, M.A. Isolation and identification of Pandoraea spp. From bronchoalveolar lavage of cystic fibrosis patients in Iran. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2019, 45, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  37. Parte, A.C.; SardàCarbasse, J.; Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Reimer, L.C.; Göker, M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 5607–5612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  38. Kostygov, A.Y.; Butenko, A.; Nenarokova, A.; Tashyreva, D.; Flegontov, P.; Lukeš, J.; Yurchenko, V. Genome of Ca. Pandoraea novymonadis, an Endosymbiotic Bacterium of the TrypanosomatidNovymonasesmeraldas. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  39. Daneshvar, M.I.; Hollis, D.G.; Steigerwalt, A.G.; Whitney, A.M.; Spangler, L.; Douglas, M.P.; Jordan, J.G.; MacGregor, J.P.; Hill, B.C.; Tenover, F.C.; et al. Assignment of CDC weak oxidizer group 2 (WO-2) to the genus Pandoraea and characterization of three new Pandoraea genomospecies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 1819–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  40. Costello, A.; Herbert, G.; Fabunmi, L.; Schaffer, K.; Kavanagh, K.A.; Caraher, E.M.; Callaghan, M.; McClean, S. Virulence of an emerging respiratory pathogen, genus Pandoraea, in vivo and its interactions with lung epithelial cells. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 60 Pt 3, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Brown, S.D.; White, R.; Tobin, P. Keep them breathing: Cystic fibrosis pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. JAAPA 2017, 30, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hauser, A.R.; Jain, M.; Bar-Meir, M.; McColley, S.A. Clinical significance of microbial infection and adaptation in cystic fibrosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 29–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  43. Gibson, R.L.; Burns, J.L.; Ramsey, B.W. Pathophysiology and management of pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003, 168, 918–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Coenye, T.; Liu, L.; Vandamme, P.; LiPuma, J.J. Identification of Pandoraea species by 16S ribosomal DNA-based PCR assays. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 4452–4455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  45. Caraher, E.; Collins, J.; Herbert, G.; Murphy, P.G.; Gallagher, C.G.; Crowe, M.J.; Callaghan, M.; McClean, S. Evaluation of in vitro virulence characteristics of the genus Pandoraea in lung epithelial cells. J. Med. Microbiol. 2008, 57 Pt 1, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gupta, P.; Sarkar, S.; Das, B.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Tribedi, P. Biofilm, pathogenesis and prevention--a journey to break the wall: A review. Arch. Microbiol. 2016, 198, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Schneider, C.; von Aulock, S.; Zedler, S.; Schinkel, C.; Hartung, T.; Faist, E. Perioperative recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Filgrastim) treatment prevents immunoinflammatory dysfunction associated with major surgery. Ann. Surg. 2004, 239, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  48. Jiang, J.W.; Ren, Z.G.; Lu, H.F.; Zhang, H.; Li, A.; Cui, G.Y.; Jia, J.J.; Xie, H.Y.; Chen, X.H.; He, Y.; et al. Optimal immunosuppressor induces stable gut microbiota after liver transplantation. World J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 24, 3871–3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  49. Yousif, A.; Jamal, M.A.; Raad, I. Biofilm-based central line-associated bloodstream infections. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2015, 830, 157–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Pagé, A.; Tivey, M.K.; Stakes, D.S.; Reysenbach, A.L. Temporal and spatial archaeal colonization of hydrothermal vent deposits. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 874–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Slatko, B.E.; Gardner, A.F.; Ausubel, F.M. Overview of Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2018, 122, e59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flow diagram of study inclusion.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of study inclusion.
Jcm 13 06905 g001
Figure 2. Pie chart of geographical distribution of Pandoraea spp. infections worldwide.
Figure 2. Pie chart of geographical distribution of Pandoraea spp. infections worldwide.
Jcm 13 06905 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of patients with Pandoraea species infection.
Table 1. Characteristics of patients with Pandoraea species infection.
CharacteristicAll Patients
(n = 43) *
Survived
(n = 30) *
Died
(n = 13) *
p-Value
Age, years, median (IQR)43 (22–61)40 (21.8–61.3)44 (28–61)0.7788
Male gender, n (%)25 (58.1)17 (56.7)8 (61.5)1
Predisposing factors
Post-surgery, n (%)3 (7)2 (6.7)1 (7.7)1
Post-cardiac surgery, n (%)2 (4.7)2 (6.7)0 (0)1
Cystic fibrosis, n (%)17 (39.5)14 (46.7)3 (23.1)0.1874
Immunosuppression, n (%)8 (18.6)4 (13.3)4 (30.8)0.2170
Active malignancy, n (%)7 (16.3)5 (16.7)2 (15.4)1
Central venous catheter, n (%)5 (11.6)4 (13.3)1 (7.7)1
Previous antimicrobial treatment, n (%)15 (34.9)10 (33.3)5 (38.5)0.7422
Bacteremia, n (%)13 (30.2)8 (26.7)5 (38.5)0.4854
Lower respiratory tract infection, n (%)32 (74.4)22 (73.3)10 (76.9)1
Polymicrobial infection, n (%)23 (53.5)19 (63.3)4 (30.8)0.0943
Clinical characteristics
Fever, n (%)14/32 (43.8)7/23 (30.4)7/9 (77.8)0.0225
Sepsis, n (%)13/36 (36.1)5/25 (20)8/11 (72.7)0.0064
Treatment
Cephalosporin, n (%)14/39 (35.9)12/27 (44.4)2/12 (16.7)0.1509
Carbapenem, n (%)32/39 (82.1)21/27 (77.8)11/12 (91.7)0.4026
Quinolone, n (%)10/39 (25.6)9/27 (33.3)1/12 (8.3)0.1312
Tetracyclines, n (%)13/39 (33.310/27 (37)3/12 (25)0.7144
TMP-SMX, n (%)14/39 (35.9)12/27 (44.4)2/12 (16.7)0.1509
Outcomes
Deaths due to infection, n (%)9 (20.9)NANANA
Deaths overall, n (%)13 (30.2)NANANA
IQR: interquartile range; NA: not applicable; TMP-SMX: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; *: data are among the number of patients mentioned on top unless otherwise described.
Table 2. Antimicrobial resistance rates (TMP-SMX: Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole).
Table 2. Antimicrobial resistance rates (TMP-SMX: Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole).
Antimicrobial AgentNumber of Patients Resistance (%)
Penicillin 6/6100
Aztreonam 21/21
Macrolides 7/7
Chloramphenicol7/7
Aminoglycosides27/2896.42
Piperacillin13/1681.25
Quinolones26/3378.78
Cephalosporins 26/3476.47
Piperacillin/Tazobactam18/2669.23
Aminopenicillins13/2356.52
Ticarcillin/Clavulanate2/450
Tetracyclines10/2147.61
Carbapenems6/3517.14
TMP-SMX3/348.82
Aminopenicillin + β-lactamase inhibitor1/128.33
Table 3. Characteristics of the different types of Pandoraea species infections.
Table 3. Characteristics of the different types of Pandoraea species infections.
Characteristic *Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
(n = 32)
Bacteremia
(n = 13)
Endocarditis
(n = 2)
Pancreatitis
(n = 2)
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
(n = 2)
Age, years, mean (IQR)38.0745.8539.55673.5
Male gender, n (%)17 (53.12%)10 (76.92%)2 (100%)1 (50%)1 (50%)
Predisposing factors
Post-surgery, n (%)1 (3.12%)3 (23.07%)000
Post-cardiac surgery, n (%)1 (3.12%)1 (7.69%)1 (50%)00
Cystic fibrosis, n (%)17 (53.12%)2 (15.38%)000
Immunosuppression, n (%)6 (18.75%)4 (30.76%)1 (50%)00
Active malignancy, n (%)4 (12.5%)3 (23.07%)000
Central venous catheter, n (%)2 (6.25%)4 (30.76%)1 (50%)00
Previous antimicrobial treatment, n (%)12 (37.5%)4 (30.76%)1 (50%)2 (100%)1 (50%)
Bacteremia, n (%)4 (12.5%)NA2 (100%)1 (50%)1 (50%)
Lower respiratory tract infection, n (%)NA4 (30.76%)002 (100%)
Polymicrobial infection, n (%)20 (62.5%)3 (23.07%)01 (50%)0
Clinical characteristics
Fever, n (%)8 (31.25%)10 (76.92%)2 (100%)NR 1 (50%)
Sepsis, n (%)8 (31.25%)6 (46.15%)1 (50%)NR1 (50%)
Treatment
Cephalosporin, n (%)11 (34.3%)5 (38.46%)000
Carbapenem, n (%)26 (81.25%)9 (69.23%)1 (50%)2 (100%)2 (100%)
Quinolone, n (%)6 (18.75%)4 (30.76%)1 (50%)00
Tetracyclines, n (%)10 (31.25%)4 (30.76%)1 (50%)00
TMP-SMX, n (%)11 (34.3%)3 (23.07%)1 (50%)1 (50%)0
Outcomes
Deaths due to infection, n (%)7 (21.87%)4 (30.76%)1 (50%)00
Deaths overall, n (%)10 (31.25%)5 (38.46%)1 (50%)1 (50%)1 (50%)
*: Data are among the number of patients mentioned on top unless otherwise described. IQR: interquarile range; NA: not applicable, NR: not reported; TMP-SMX: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
Table 4. Logistic regression of overall mortality of Pandoraea species infections.
Table 4. Logistic regression of overall mortality of Pandoraea species infections.
CharacteristicUnivariate Analysis p-ValueMultivariate Analysis p-ValueOR (95% CI)
Fever0.01430.2803.359 (0.372–30.297)
Sepsis0.00170.1534.658 (0.564–38.470)
CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ziogou, A.; Giannakodimos, A.; Giannakodimos, I.; Tsantes, A.G.; Ioannou, P. Pandoraea Infections in Humans—A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6905. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226905

AMA Style

Ziogou A, Giannakodimos A, Giannakodimos I, Tsantes AG, Ioannou P. Pandoraea Infections in Humans—A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(22):6905. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226905

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ziogou, Afroditi, Alexios Giannakodimos, Ilias Giannakodimos, Andreas G. Tsantes, and Petros Ioannou. 2024. "Pandoraea Infections in Humans—A Systematic Review" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 22: 6905. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226905

APA Style

Ziogou, A., Giannakodimos, A., Giannakodimos, I., Tsantes, A. G., & Ioannou, P. (2024). Pandoraea Infections in Humans—A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(22), 6905. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226905

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop