Factors Affecting the Success Rate of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Paediatric Patients
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Patients and Method
2.1. Preoperative Evaluation
2.2. Surgical Technique
2.3. Postoperative Evaluation
2.4. Statistical Evaluation
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Alpay, H.; Ozen, A.; Gokce, I.; Biyikli, N. Clinical and metabolic features of urolithiasis and microlithiasis in children. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2009, 24, 2203–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Demirkesen, O.; Önal, B.; Tansu, N.; Altintaş, R.; YalçIn, V.; Öner, A. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower caliceal stones in children compared with stones in other renal locations. Urology 2006, 67, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kurien, A.; Symons, S.; Manohar, T.; Desai, M. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: Equivalent clearance rates to adults is achieved with fewer and lower energy shock waves. BJU Int. 2009, 103, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muslumanoglu, A.Y.; Tefekli, A.; Sarilar, O.; Binbay, M.; Altunrende, F.; Ozkuvanci, U. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy as First Line Treatment Alternative for Urinary Tract Stones in Children: A Large Scale Retrospective Analysis. J. Urol. 2003, 170, 2405–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Soygur, T.; Arikan, N.; Kilic, O.; Suer, E. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: Evaluation of the results considering the need for auxiliary procedures. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2006, 2, 459–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Erdenetsesteg, G.; Manohar, T.; Singh, H.; Desai, M.R. Endourologic Management of Pediatric Urolithiasis: Proposed Clinical Guidelines. J. Endourol. 2006, 20, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ozden, E.; Sahin, A.; Tan, B.; Dogan, H.S.; Eren, M.T.; Tekgul, S. Percutaneous renal surgery in children with complex stones. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2008, 4, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kennedy, W.A. Assessment and Management of Fetal Hydronephrosis. NeoReviews 2002, 3, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayar, G.; Kadihasanoglu, M.; Aydin, M.; Sariogullari, U.; Tanriverdi, O.; Kendirici, M. The effect of stone localization on the success and complication rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol. J. 2014, 11, 1938–1942. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Tiselius, H.G.; Andersson, A. Stone burden in an average Swedish population of stone formers requiring active stone removal: How can the stone size be estimated in the clinical routine? Eur. Urol. 2003, 43, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dindo, D.; Demartines, N.; Clavien, P.A. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004, 240, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choi, H.; Snyder, H.M.; Duckett, J.W. Urolithiasis in childhood: Current management. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1987, 22, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, P.E.I.; Tong, H.-L.; Cocks, F.H.; Pearle, M.S.; Preminger, G.M. Transient Cavitation and Acoustic Emission Produced by Different Laser Lithotripters. J. Endourol. 1998, 12, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pertusa, C.; Albisu, A.; Acha, M.; Blasco, M.; Llarena, R.; Arregui, P. Lithotripsy with the alexandrite laser: Our initial 100 clinical cases. Eur. Urol. 1991, 20, 269–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Segura, J.W. The role of percutaneous surgery in renal and ureteral stone removal. J. Urol. 1989, 141 Pt 2, 780–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldwasser, B.; Weinerth, J.L.; Carson, C.C.; Dunnick, N.R. Factors affecting the success rate of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and the incidence of retained fragments. J. Urol. 1986, 136, 358–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desai, M.R.; Kukreja, R.A.; Patel, S.H.; Bapat, S.D. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric renal calculus disease. J. Endourol. 2004, 18, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yadav, S.S.; Aggarwal, S.P.; Mathur, R.; Sharma, K.K.; Yadav, R.G.; Tomar, V.; Teli, R.D.; Jain, D. Pediatric Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy-Experience of a Tertiary Care Center. J. Endourol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gonen, M.; Turunc, T.; Ozturk, B.; Aygun, C.; Ozkardes, H. Outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children having complex stones. Urol. Int. 2009, 83, 416–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guven, S.; Istanbulluoglu, O.; Gul, U.; Ozturk, A.; Celik, H.; Aygun, C.; Ozdemir, U.; Ozturk, B.; Ozkardes, H.; Kilinc, M. Successful percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: Multicenter study on current status of its use, efficacy and complications using Clavien classification. J. Urol. 2011, 185, 1419–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Turk, C.; Petrik, A.; Sarica, K.; Seitz, C.; Skolarikos, A.; Straub, M.; et al. EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis. Eur. Urol. 2016, 69, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Netto, N.R., Jr.; Ikonomidis, J.; Ikari, O.; Claro, J.A. Comparative study of percutaneous access for staghorn calculi. Urology 2005, 65, 659–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, Z.; Dong, Z.; Ding, H.; Wang, H.; Ma, B.; Wang, Z. Tamsulosin for Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Urol. Int. 2012, 89, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Basiri, A.; Karrami, H.; Moghaddam, S.M.H.; Shadpour, P. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with or without a History of Open Nephrolithotomy. J. Endourol. 2003, 17, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yuruk, E.; Tefekli, A.; Sari, E.; Karadag, M.A.; Tepeler, A.; Binbay, M.; Muslumanoglu, A.Y. Does previous extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy affect the performance and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J. Urol. 2009, 181, 663–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Allen, D.; O’Brien, T.; Tiptaft, R.; Glass, J. Defining the Learning Curve for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J. Endourol. 2005, 19, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Onal, B.; Dogan, H.S.; Satar, N.; Bilen, C.Y.; Gunes, A.; Ozden, E.; Ozturk, A.; Demirci, D.; Istanbulluoglu, O.; Gurocak, S.; et al. Factors affecting complication rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: Results of a multi-institutional retrospective analysis by the Turkish pediatric urology society. J. Urol. 2014, 191, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, Y.; Ma, Y.; Song, Y.; Fei, X. Evaluating the Learning Curve for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy under Total Ultrasound Guidance. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saad, K.S.; Youssif, M.E.; Hamdy, S.A.I.N.; Fahmy, A.; Hanno, A.G.E.D.; El-Nahas, A.R. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for large renal stones in pediatric patients: A randomized controlled trial. J. Urol. 2015, 194, 1716–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
n (%) | ||
---|---|---|
Side | Right | 29 (70.7) |
Left | 12 (29.3) | |
Same side previous urological procedure history | Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy | 6 (14.6) |
Ureterorenoscopy | 3 (7.3) | |
Retrograde intrarenal surgery | 2 (4.9) | |
Pyelolithotomy | 7 (17.1) | |
No previous procedure | 23 (56.1) | |
Grade of hydronephrosis | Grade 0 | 19 (46.3) |
Grade 1 | 8 (19.5) | |
Grade 2 | 10 (24.4) | |
Grade 3 | 4 (9.8) | |
Radiological diagnostic method | Abdominal X-ray and US | 6 (14.6) |
Intravenous urography and US | 19 (46.3) | |
Intravenous urography | 11 (26.8) | |
US and sCT | 5 (12.2) | |
Accompanying disease | Frequent urinary tract infection | 7 (17.1) |
Contralateral stone | 5 (12.2) | |
Cystinosis | 5 (12.2) | |
Vesicoureteral reflux | 1 (2.4) | |
Tip 1 Hypercalciuria | 1 (2.4) | |
Chronic renal disease | 1 (2.4) | |
Osteogenesis imperfecta | 1 (2.4) | |
No accompanying disease | 20 (48.8) |
Mean (Min–Max) | |
---|---|
Duration of anaesthesia (minute) | 122.44 (75–195) |
Duration of fluoroscopy (minute) | 2.53 (0.5–10.0) |
Amount of irrigation (liter) | 5.01 (2.2–9.0) |
Duration of operation (minute) | 102.07 (60–180) |
Duration of diversion (day) | 2.45 (1–5) |
Duration of postoperative hospitalization (day) | 4.27 (2–12) |
Duration of total hospitalization (day) | 7.41 (2–18) |
Overall n (%) | Mean Stone Burden (cm2) ± SS | Successful | Unsuccessful n (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stone Free n (%) | <4 mm Residual Fragment n (%) | ||||
Simple Stones | 30 (73.2) | 5.89 ± 1.99 | 20 (66.7) | 9 (30) | 1 (3.3) |
Isolated renal pelvic | 18 (43.9) | 6.08 | 14 (77.8) | 3 (16.7) | 1 (5.6) |
Isolated lower calyceal | 6 (14.6) | 5.84 | 4 (66.7) | 2 (33.3) | 0 |
Isolated medium calyceal | 1 (2.4) | 3.60 | 0 | 1 (100) | 0 |
Isolated upper calyceal | 5 (12.2) | 6.0 | 2 (40) | 3 (60) | 0 |
Complex Stones | 11 (26.8) | 7.57 ± 1.73 | 4 (36.4) | 1 (9.1) | 6 (54.5) |
Staghorn | 2 (4.9) | 7.35 | 1 (50) | 0 | 1 (50) |
Partial staghorn | 4 (9.8) | 8.88 | 3 (75) | 1 (25) | 0 |
Renal pelvic and lower calyceal | 3 (7.3) | 6.87 | 0 | 0 | 3 (100) |
Medium and upper calyceal | 1 (2.4) | 4.50 | 0 | 0 | 1 (100) |
Multiple calyceal | 1 (2.4) | 8.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (100) |
Overall | 41 | 6.34 ± 2.05 | 22 (53.7) | 12 (29.3) | 7 (17.1) |
Successful n (%) | Unsuccessful n (%) | p-Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (year) | <5 | 6 (75) | 2 (25) | 0.777 |
5–12 | 15 (83.3) | 3 (16.7) | ||
13–18 | 13 (86.7) | 2 (13.3) | ||
Body mass index (kg/m2) | <25 | 28 (82.4) | 6 (17.6) | 0.830 |
≥25 | 6 (85.7) | 1 (14.3) | ||
Stone burden (cm2) | <5 | 10 (90.9) | 1 (9.1) | 0.411 |
≥5 | 24 (80) | 6 (20) | ||
Stone localization | Simple | 29 (96.7) | 1 (3.3) | <0.001 |
Complex | 5 (45.5) | 6 (54.5) | ||
Grade of hydronephrosis | Gr 0–1 | 25 (92.6) | 2 (7.4) | 0.022 |
Gr 2–4 | 9 (64.3) | 5 (35.7) | ||
Location of access | Lower calyx | 16 (84.2) | 3 (15.8) | 0.839 |
Medium calyx | 18 (81.8) | 4 (18.2) | ||
Diameter of sheath (Fr) | <20 | 29 (85.3) | 5 (14.7) | 0.375 |
≥20 | 5 (71.4) | 2 (28.6) | ||
Complications | No | 28 (87.5) | 4 (12.5) | 0.142 |
Yes | 6 (66.7) | 3 (33.3) | ||
Same side previous urological procedure history | No | 27 (93.1) | 2 (6.9) | <0.001 |
Yes | 7 (58.3) | 5 (41.7) |
Grade | n (%) |
---|---|
Grade 1 | 8 (44.4) |
Fever | 4 (22.2) |
Transient serum creatinine elevation | 3 (16.6) |
Wound infection | 1 (5.6) |
Grade 2 | 7 (38.8) |
Blood transfusion | 3 (16.6) |
Urinary tract infection | 4 (22.2) |
Grade 3a | 2 (11.1) |
Urine leakage for longer than 24 hours | 2 (11.1) |
Grade 3b | 1 (5.6) |
Ureteral obstruction related to stone | 1 (5.6) |
Grade 4a | 0 |
Grade 4b | 0 |
Grade 5 | 0 |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jabrayilov, H.; Koparal, M.Y.; Gürocak, S.; Küpeli, B.; Tan, M.Ö. Factors Affecting the Success Rate of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Paediatric Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7030043
Jabrayilov H, Koparal MY, Gürocak S, Küpeli B, Tan MÖ. Factors Affecting the Success Rate of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Paediatric Patients. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2018; 7(3):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7030043
Chicago/Turabian StyleJabrayilov, Hikmat, Murat Yavuz Koparal, Serhat Gürocak, Bora Küpeli, and Mustafa Özgür Tan. 2018. "Factors Affecting the Success Rate of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Paediatric Patients" Journal of Clinical Medicine 7, no. 3: 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7030043
APA StyleJabrayilov, H., Koparal, M. Y., Gürocak, S., Küpeli, B., & Tan, M. Ö. (2018). Factors Affecting the Success Rate of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Paediatric Patients. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 7(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7030043