Impact of Midurethral Sling Implantation on Sexual Function in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kwon, B.E.; Kim, G.Y.; Son, Y.J.; Roh, Y.S.; You, M.A. Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: A systematic literature review. Int. Neurourol. J. 2010, 14, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aslan, G.; Köseoğlu, H.; Sadik, O.; Gimen, S.; Cihan, A.; Esen, A. Sexual function in women with urinary incontinence. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2005, 17, 248–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Shaw, C. A systematic review of the literature on the prevalence of sexual impairment in women with urinary incontinence and the prevalence of urinary leakage during sexual activity. Eur. Urol. 2002, 42, 432–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duralde, E.R.; Rowen, T.S. Urinary Incontinence and Associated Female Sexual Dysfunction. Sex Med. Rev. 2017, 5, 470–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schiavi, M.C.; Sciuga, V.; Giannini, A.; Vena, F.; D’oria, O.; Prata, G.; Di Tucci, C.; Savone, D.; Aleksa, N.; Capone, C.; et al. Overactive bladder syndrome treatment with ospemifene in menopausal patients with vulvovaginal atrophy: Improvement of sexuality? Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2018, 34, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zyczynski, H.M.; Rickey, L.; Dyer, K.Y.; Wilson, T.; Stoddard, A.M.; Gormley, E.A.; Hsu, Y.; Kusek, J.W.; Brubaker, L.; Network, U.I.T. Sexual activity and function in women more than 2 years after midurethral sling placement. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 207, 421.e1–421.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Naumann, G.; Steetskamp, J.; Meyer, M.; Laterza, R.M.; Skala, C.; Albrich, S.; Koelbl, H. Sexual function and quality of life following retropubic TVT and single-incision sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: Results of a prospective study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2013, 287, 959–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mazouni, C.; Karsenty, G.; Bretelle, F.; Bladou, F.; Gamerre, M.; Serment, G. Urinary complications and sexual function after the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2004, 83, 955–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenton, K.; Stoddard, A.M.; Zyczynski, H.; Albo, M.; Rickey, L.; Norton, P.; Wai, C.; Kraus, S.R.; Sirls, L.T.; Kusek, J.W.; et al. 5-year longitudinal followup after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings. J. Urol. 2015, 193, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glavind, K.; Larsen, T.; Lindquist, A.S.I. Sexual function in women before and after tension-free vaginal tape operation for stress urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2014, 93, 986–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marszalek, M.; Roehlich, M.; Racz, U.; Metzenbauer, M.; Ponholzer, A.; Rauchenwald, M.; Madersbacher, S. Sexual function after tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Urol. Int. 2007, 78, 126–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jha, S.; Ammenbal, M.; Metwally, M. Impact of incontinence surgery on sexual function: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Sex Med. 2012, 9, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fürst, M.C.B.; Leite, P.H.B.; Glina, F.; Baccaglini, W.; Fürst, R.V.D.C.; Bezerra, C.A.; Glina, S. Female Sexual Function Following Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sex Med. Rev. 2018, 6, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzybowska, M.E.; Piaskowska-Cala, J.; Wydra, D.G. Polish translation and validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR). Int. Urogynecol. J. 2019, 30, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Rogers, R.G.; Rockwood, T.H.; Constantine, M.L.; Thakar, R.; Kammerer-Doak, D.N.; Pauls, R.N.; Parekh, M.; Ridgeway, B.; Jha, S.; Pitkin, J.; et al. A new measure of sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders (PFD): The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR). Int. Urogynecol. J. 2013, 24, 1091–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kociszewski, J.; Rautenberg, O.; Kuszka, A.; Eberhard, J.; Hilgers, R.; Viereck, V. Can we place tension-free vaginal tape where it should be? The one-third rule. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 39, 210–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mollaioli, D.; Ciocca, G.; Limoncin, E.; Di Sante, S.; Gravina, G.L.; Carosa, E.; Lenzi, A.; Jannini, E.A. Lifestyles and sexuality in men and women: The gender perspective in sexual medicine. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2020, 18, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rohleder, P.; Flowers, P. Towards a psychology of sexual health. J. Health Psychol. 2018, 23, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schiavi, M.C.; D’Oria, O.; Faiano, P.; Prata, G.; Di Pinto, A.; Sciuga, V.; Colagiovanni, V.; Giannini, A.; Zullo, M.A.; Monti, M.; et al. Vaginal Native Tissue Repair for Posterior Compartment Prolapse: Long-Term Analysis of Sexual Function and Quality of Life in 151 Patients. Female Pelvic. Med. Reconstr. Surg. 2018, 24, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alwaal, A.; Tian, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Ma, L.; Lin, G.; Deng, D. Female sexual function following mid-urethral slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2016, 28, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majkusiak, W.; Pomian, A.; Horosz, E.; Zwierzchowska, A.; Tomasik, P.; Lisik, W.; Barcz, E. Demographic risk factors for mid-urethral sling failure. Do they really matter? PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maaita, M.; Bhaumik, J.; Davies, A.E. Sexual function after using tension-free vaginal tape for the surgical treatment of genuine stress incontinence. BJU Int. 2002, 90, 540–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ghezzi, F.; Serati, M.; Cromi, A.; Uccella, S.; Triacca, P.; Bolis, P. Impact oftension-free vaginal tape on sexual function: Results of a prospective study. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006, 17, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elzevier, H.W.; Venema, P.L.; Lycklama á Nijeholt, A.A. Sexual function after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for stress incontinence: Results of a mailed questionnaire. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004, 15, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bekker, M.D.; Hogewoning, C.R.; Wallner, C.; Elzevier, H.W.; Deruiter, M.C. The somatic and autonomic innervation of the clitoris; preliminary evidence of sexual dysfunction after minimally invasive slings. J. Sex Med. 2012, 9, 1566–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lowenstein, L.; Mustafa, S.; Gartman, I.; Gruenwald, I. Effect of Midurethral Sling Surgery on Vaginal Sensation. J. Sex Med. 2016, 13, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caruso, S.; Rugolo, S.; Bandiera, S.; Mirabella, D.; Cavallaro, A.; Cianci, A. Clitoral blood flow changes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence: Pilot study on TVT Versus TOT procedures. Urology 2007, 70, 554–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
All (n = 171) | Sexually Active (n = 116) | Not Sexually Active (n = 55) | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 56.3 ± 11.2 | 52.7 ± 9.8 | 64.0 ± 10.1 | <0.001 |
Height (cm) | 163.4 ± 6.1 | 164 ± 6.1 | 162.1 ± 5.9 | 0.07 (ns) |
Body weight (kg) | 74.2 ± 12.7 | 72.7± 13.0 | 77.5 ± 1.7 | <0.02 |
Body mass index (BMI) | 27.8 ± 4.5 | 27.0 ± 4.5 | 29.5 ± 4.1 | <0.001 |
No. deliveries (total) | 2.1 ± 1.0 | 2.2± 1.0 | 2.0 ± 1.0 | 0.20 (ns) |
No. of vaginal deliveries | 1.9 ± 1.1 | 2.0 ± 1.1 | 1.9 ± 1.0 | 0.56 (ns) |
No. of Cesarean sections | 0.2 ± 0.5 | 0.2± 0.6 | 0.1± 0.3 | 0.15 (ns) |
No. of instrumental deliveries (vacuum or forceps) | 0.0 ± 0.1 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.1 | 0.15 (ns) |
Average birth weight (g) | 3362 ± 508 | 3367 ± 457 | 3351 ± 611 | 0.85 (ns) |
Maximum birth weight (g) | 3555 ± 528 | 3550 ± 467 | 3536 ± 648 | 0.76 (ns) |
Before TVT | After TVT | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All (n = 171) | Sexually active (n = 116) | Not sexually active (n = 55) | All (n = 133) | Sexually active (n = 86) | Not sexually active (n = 47) | |
Pad test (g) | 63.3 ± 71.7 | 61.9 ± 69.0 | 66.5 ± 77.9 | 5.7 ± 33.8 | 3.2 ± 23.3 | 10.1 ± 46.8 |
Pad test ≤ 2 g | (121/133) 90.98% | (80/88) 92.0% | (41/45) 91.1% | |||
IIQ7 score | 71.4 ± 18.6 | 74.3 ± 32.9 | 79.0 ± 20.0 | 14.8 ± 22.4 | 13.8 ± 22.4 | 15.7 ± 23.3 |
Coital incontinence | 96/171 (56.1%) | 11/133 (8.6%) |
Score | Before TVT | After TVT | p |
---|---|---|---|
Not sexually active * | |||
n | 50 | 41 | |
Global quality | 3.14 ± 0.98 | 2.58 ± 0.79 | 0.006 |
-Condition specific | 2.07 ± 0.92 | 1.61 ± 0.88 | 0.006 |
-Condition impact | 2.91 ± 1.09 | 1.44 ± 0.70 | <0.001 |
-Partner related | 2.72 ± 1.07 | 2.70 ± 1.06 | 0.87 (ns) |
Not Sexually active * (patients with missing data in both pre- and post-operative surveys were excluded) | |||
n | 39 | 39 | |
Global quality | 3.06 ± 1.04 | 2.61 ± 0.78 | 0.019 |
-Condition specific | 2.15 ± 0.98 | 1.68 ± 0.89 | 0.01 |
-Condition impact | 3.01 ± 1.07 | 1.64 ± 0.83 | <0.001 |
-Partner related | 2.79 ± 1.02 | 2.77 ± 1.08 | 0.95 |
Sexually active ** | |||
n | 109 | 80 | |
Global quality | 2.91 ± 0.80 | 3.31 ± 0.94 | 0.006 |
-Arousal, Orgasm | 3.29 ± 0.80 | 3.60 ± 0.65 | 0.008 |
-Partner related | 3.29 ± 0.58 | 3.43 ± 0.43 | 0.18 (ns) |
-Condition specific | 3.52 ± 1.09 | 4.54 ± 0.70 | <0.001 |
-Condition impact | 2.57 ± 0.77 | 3.42 ± 0.70 | <0.001 |
-Desire | 3.03 ± 0.62 | 3.07 ± 0.46 | 0.78 (ns) |
Sexually active ** (patients with missing data in both pre- and post-operative surveys were excluded) | |||
n | 77 | 77 | |
Global quality | 2.94 ± 0.79 | 3.32 ± 0.93 | 0.015 |
-Arousal, Orgasm | 3.20 ± 0.80 | 3.59 ± 0.65 | <0.001 |
-Partner related | 3.26 ± 0.52 | 3.41 ± 0.46 | 0.009 |
-Condition specific | 3.56 ± 1.08 | 4.57 ± 0.69 | <0.001 |
-Condition impact | 2.59 ± 0.76 | 3.36 ± 0.76 | <0.001 |
-Desire | 2.97 ± 0.60 | 3.04 ± 0.45 | 0.287 (ns) |
Score | Before TVT (n = 12) | After TVT (n = 12) | p |
---|---|---|---|
Not sexually active * | |||
n | 4 | 4 | |
Global quality | 2.27 ± 0.55 | 2.95 ± 0.90 | 0.48 (ns) |
-Condition specific | 2.30 ± 1.06 | 2.2 ± 0.67 | 0.61 (ns) |
-Condition impact | 2.67 ± 1.53 | 3.0 ± 0.96 | 0.48 (ns) |
-Partner related | 2.88 ± 0.85 | 3.0 ± 1.22 | 0.61 (ns) |
Sexually active ** | |||
n | 8 | 8 | p |
Global quality | 3.2 ± 0.40 | 2.94 ± 0.72 | 0.62 (ns) |
-Arousal, Orgasm | 2.53 ± 0.54 | 2.76 ± 0.25 | 0.07 (ns) |
-Partner related | 2.74 ± 0.62 | 2.92 ± 0.80 | 0.62 (ns) |
-Condition specific | 2.95 ± 1.42 | 3.8 ± 1.09 | 0.37 (ns) |
-Condition impact | 2.25 ± 0.69 | 2.46 ± 1.05 | 1.0 (ns) |
-Desire | 2.75 ± 0.36 | 2.68 ± 0.25 | 0.48 (ns) |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Horosz, E.; Zwierzchowska, A.; Pomian, A.; Majkusiak, W.; Tomasik, P.; Barcz, E. Impact of Midurethral Sling Implantation on Sexual Function in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051538
Horosz E, Zwierzchowska A, Pomian A, Majkusiak W, Tomasik P, Barcz E. Impact of Midurethral Sling Implantation on Sexual Function in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(5):1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051538
Chicago/Turabian StyleHorosz, Edyta, Aneta Zwierzchowska, Andrzej Pomian, Wojciech Majkusiak, Paweł Tomasik, and Ewa Barcz. 2020. "Impact of Midurethral Sling Implantation on Sexual Function in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 5: 1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051538
APA StyleHorosz, E., Zwierzchowska, A., Pomian, A., Majkusiak, W., Tomasik, P., & Barcz, E. (2020). Impact of Midurethral Sling Implantation on Sexual Function in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(5), 1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051538