Evaluation of Eight Genotypes of Corn for the Commercial Cultivation of Huitlacoche in Nopalucan, Puebla, Mexico
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Biological Material
2.3. Corn Genotypes
2.4. Field Experiment
2.5. Proximal Chemical Analysis of Huitlacoche of Different Genotypes of Corn
2.6. Mineral Element Analysis
2.7. Data Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Krombach, S.; Reissmann, S.; Kreibich, S.; Bochen, F.; Kahmann, R. Virulence function of the Ustilago maydis sterol carrier protein 2. New Phytol. 2018, 220, 553–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Juárez-Montiel, M.; Ruiloba de León, S.; Chávez-Camarillo, G.; Hernández-Rodríguez, C.; Villa-Tanaca, L. Huitlacoche (corn smut) caused by the phytopathogenic fungus Ustilago maydis, as a functional food. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2011, 28, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paredes, L.O.; Guevara-Lara, F.; Bello, P.L. Los Alimentos Mágicos de las Culturas Indígenas Mesoamericanas; Fondo de Cultura Económica: Mexico City, Mexico, 2013; p. 197. [Google Scholar]
- Aguayo-Gonzalez, D.; Acosta-Ramos, M.; Pérez-Cabrera, L.; Guevara-Lara, F.; García-Munguía, F. Producción natural de Huitlacoche [Ustilago maydis (DC) Corda] en el estado de Aguascalientes. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agric. 2016, 7, 1043–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pataky, J. Production of cuitlacoche (Ustilago maydis) on sweet corn. HortScience 1991, 26, 374–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guevara-Vazquez, E.; Valadez-Moctezuma, E.; Acosta-Ramos, M.; Espinosa-Solares, T.; Villanueva-Verduzco, C. Identificación de levaduras asociadas al Huitlacoche. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic 2009, 15, 225–230. [Google Scholar]
- Kealey, K.S.; Kosikowski, F.V.; Gray, W.D. Corn smut as a food source. Perspectives on biology. Composition, and nutrition. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 15, 321–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pimentel-González, D.; Rodriguez-Huezo, M.; Campos-Montiel, R.; Trapala-Islas, A.; Hernández-Fuentes, A. Influencia de la variedad de maíz en las características fisicoquímicas del Huitlacoche (Ustilago maydis). Rev. Mex. Ing. Quím. 2011, 10, 171–178. [Google Scholar]
- Pataky, J.K.; Chandler, M.A. Production of Huitlacoche, Ustilago maydis: Timing inoculation and controlling pollitantion. Mycologia 2003, 95, 1261–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du-Toit, L.; Pataky, J. Effects of silk maturity and pollination on infection of corn ears by Ustilago maydis. Plant Dis. 1999, 83, 621–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thompson, M.; Raizada, M. Fungal pathogens of corn gaining free passage along the silk road. Pathogens 2018, 7, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Massieu-Trigo, Y.; Lechuga, J. El maíz en México: Biodiversidad y cambios en el consumo. Rev. Anál. Económico 2002, 17, 281–303. [Google Scholar]
- Pataky, J.; Nankam, C.; Kerns, M. Evaluation of a silk-inoculation technique to differentiate reactions of sweet corn hybrids to common smut. Phytopathology 1995, 85, 1323–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanegas, P.; Valverde, M.; Paredes-López, O.; Pataky, J. Production of the edible fungus Huitlacoche (Ustilago maydis): Effect of corn genotype on chemical composition. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 1995, 80, 104–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valdez-Morales, M.; Barry, K.; Fahey, G.; Dominguez, J.; Mejía, E.; Valverd, M.; Paredes-López, O. Effect of corn genotype, developmental stage, and cooking process on the nutraceutical potential of Huitlacoche (Ustilago maydis). Food Chem. 2010, 119, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Martínez, L.; Villanueva-Verduzco, C.; Sahagún-Castellanos, J. Susceptibility and resistance of corn to the edible fungus Huitlacoche (Ustilago maydis Cda) improving its virulence. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic. 2000, 6, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villanueva, C.; Molina, J.; Castillo, F.; Zavaleta, E. Artificial production of “Huitlacoche” (Ustilago maydis Cda.) influence of different conditions in the field. Micol. Neotrop. Appl. 1999, 12, 41–47. [Google Scholar]
- Valverde, M.E.; Hernández-Pérez, T.; Paredes-López, O. Edible mushrooms: Improving human health and promoting quality life. Int. J. Microbiol. 2015, e376387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, J.J.; Baumgarten, M.; May, G. Effects of host plant enviroment and Ustilago maydis infection of the fungal endophyte community of corn (Zea mays). New Phytol. 2008, 178, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SIAP-SAGARPA. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. 2019. Available online: www.siap.gob.mx (accessed on 10 August 2020).
- García, E. Modificaciones al Sistema de Clasificación Climática de Köppen; Instituto de Geografía, Ed.; Universidad Autónoma de México: Mexico City, Mexico, 2004; p. 170. [Google Scholar]
- Villanueva, V.; Sánchez, R.; Villanueva, S. El Huitlacoche y su Cultivo; Mundi Prensa: Mexico City, Mexico, 2007; p. 96. [Google Scholar]
- Ruiz-Herrera, J.; León, C.; Guevara-Olvera, L.; Cárabez-Trejo, A. Yeast mycelial dimorphism of haploid and diploid strains of Ustilago maydis. Microbiology 1995, 141, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Madrigal-Rodriguez, J.; Villanueva, C.; Sahagún, C.J. Ensayos de producción de Huitlacoche (Ustilago maydis Cda.) hidropónico en invernadero. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic 2010, 16, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- INIFAP. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. 2018. Available online: www.gob.mx/inifap (accessed on 1 August 2018).
- Banuett, F.; Herskowitz, I. Discrete Developmental Stages during Teliospore Formation in the Corn Smut Fungus, Ustilago maydis. Development 1996, 122, 2965–2976. [Google Scholar]
- AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International; Association of Official Analysis Chemists International: Rockville, MD, USA, 2005; ISBN 0935584544. [Google Scholar]
- Feldsine, P.; Abeyta, C.; Andrews, W.H. AOAC International methods committee guidelines for validation of qualitative and quantitative food microbiological official methods of analysis. J. AOAC Int. 2002, 85, 1187–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sales-Campos, C.; Carvalho, L.; Minhoni, M.; Saad, A.; Alquati, G.; Andrade, M. Cultivation and bromatological analysis of the medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum (Curt.: Fr.) P. Karst cultivated in agricultural waste. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 14, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van-Soest, P. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, 2nd ed.; Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA; London, UK, 2002; p. 500. [Google Scholar]
- Seibel, W. Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 8th ed.; American Association of Cereal Chemists: Saint Paul, MN, USA, 1989; p. 443. [Google Scholar]
- Pérez-Grana, R. Exactitud de las tablas de composición de alimentos en la determinación de nutrientes. Sanid. Mil. 2013, 69, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aydogdu, M.; Golukcu, M. Nutritional value of Huitlacoche, corn mushroom caused by Ustilago maydis. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 37, 531–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Codex Alimentarius Commission Codex-FAO Standard for Vitamin and Mineral Requirements, CODEX STAN 12-1985. Available online: http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/shproxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FMeetings%252FCX-720-14%252Fal85_26e.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2019).
- Cano-Estrada, A.; Romero-Bautista, L. Valor económico, nutricional y medicinal de hongos comestibles silvestres. Rev. Chil. Nutr. 2016, 43, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ruiz-Herrera, J. Ustilago maydis: Ascenso de un hongo mexicano de la gastronomía local al mundo científico. Nova Sci. 2008, 1, 118–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Karen Snetselaar, K.; McCann, M. Ustilago maydis, the corn smut fungus, has an unusual diploid mitotic stage. J. Mycol. 2017, 109, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez, M.L.; Muñoz, O.A.; Mejía, C.A.; Molina, G.D.; Zavaleta, M.E.; Sandoval, I.S.; Villanueva, V.C. Efectos genéticos e interacciones entre familias de maíz y aislados de Huitlacoche (Ustilago maydis D. C. Corda). Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic. 2005, 11, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aydoğdu, M. Huitlacoche yield in some corn genotypes in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 35, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Salazar-Torres, J.C.; Martínez, E.; Álvarez, R.; Méndez, A. Susceptibilidad de maíces híbridos y criollos al Huitlacoche (Ustilago maydis). Aport. Cienc. Agron. Ambient. 2014, 1, 39–47. [Google Scholar]
- Beas, F.; Loranca, P.; Guzmán, M.; Rodriguez, G.; Vasco, M.; Guevara, L. Potencial Nutracéutico de componentes bioactivos presentes en Huitlacoche de la zona centro de México. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Farm. 2011, 42, 36–44. [Google Scholar]
- Turło, J.; Gutkowska, B.; Kałucka, M.; Bujak, M. Accumulation of zinc by the lentinus edodes (Berk.) mycelium cultivated in submerged culture. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2007, 64, 45–51. [Google Scholar]
- Martha-Paz, A.; Eide, D.; Mendoza-Còztl, D.; Castro-Guerrero, N.; Aréchiga-Carvajal, E. Zinc uptake in the Basidiomycota: Characterization of zinc transporters in Ustilago maydis. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2019, 35, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Sample Availability: Samples are available from the authors. |
Category * | Cob Cover by Galls (%) | Judgment of Categorization |
---|---|---|
SEV1 | 0 | No presence of galls. |
SEV2 | >0–25 | Less than or equal to ¼ length of corn cob with the presence of galls. |
SEV3 | >25–50 | Greater than ¼ and less than or equal to ½ the length of the corn cob with the presence of galls. |
SEV4 | >50–75 | Greater than ½ and less than or equal to ¾ the length of the corn cob with the presence of galls. |
SEV5 | >75–100 | Greater than ¾ and full coverage of the length of the corn cob with the presence of galls. |
Genotype of Corn | Characteristics | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net Weight (g) | Sheet Weight (g) | Cob Weight (g) | Corn Kernels without Galls (g) | GMI * (g) | |
Creole white | 515.30 ± 43.9 a | 107.20 ± 19.6 a | 101.90 ± 17.3 a,b,c | 116.20 ± 0.9 a | 190.00 ± 0.4 c |
Creole white-creamy | 499.00 ± 3.43 a,b | 80.50 ± 10.2 a,b | 137.00 ± 17.7 a | 31.80 ± 0.5 e | 249.70 ± 0.5 a |
Creole yellow | 348.20 ± 26.1 c,d | 52.50 ± 8.1 b | 67.50 ± 11.6 b,c | 78.10 ± 0.7 c | 150.10 ± 0.4 d |
Creole blue | 300.00 ± 41.6 d | 67.20 ± 10.1 a,b | 51.60 ± 6.2 c | 29.00 ± 0.8 f | 152.20 ± 0.4 d |
Asgrow Hawk | 439.00 ± 27.7 a,b,c | 87.50 ± 6.4 a,b | 118.70 ± 13.4 a,b | 12.70 ± 0.1 g | 220.10 ± 0.5 b |
Asgrow Sparrow-hawk | 475.60 ± 36.4 a,b,c | 97.90 ± 12.7 a,b | 130.00 ± 10.2 a | 91.80 ± 0.3 b | 155.90 ± 0.5 d |
Aspros AS-722 | 479.50 ± 24.6 a,b,c | 100.30 ± 30.7 a,b | 133.80 ± 7.5 a | 65.80 ± 0.8 d | 179.60 ± 0.5 c |
Hartz seed Z-60 | 364.80 ± 26.7 b,c,d | 61.90 ± 9.0 a,b | 73.20 ± 14.0 b,c | 29.30 ± 0.9 f | 200.40 ± 0.4 b,c |
Origin | DF | SS Tight | MS Tight | F-Value | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 9 | 37,281,510,943 | 4,142,390,105 | 2441.79 | <0.001 |
Linear | 3 | 17,898,430,762 | 5,966,143,587 | 3516.82 | <0.001 |
X1 = Genotype of corn (1, 2, ……8). | 1 | 95,671,267 | 95,671,267 | 56.39 | <0.001 |
X2 = PI | 1 | 104,228,713 | 104,228,713 | 61.44 | <0.001 |
X3 = SEVi (1, 2, 3, 4 y 5). | 1 | 5,308,899 | 5,308,899 | 3.13 | <0.077 |
Square | 3 | 181,098371 | 60,366,124 | 35.58 | <0.001 |
X12 | 1 | 79,006,159 | 79,006,159 | 46.57 | <0.001 |
X22 | 1 | 28,362,348 | 2,836,2348 | 16.72 | <0.001 |
X32 | 1 | 43,519,284 | 43,519,284 | 25.65 | <0.001 |
Interaction of 2 factors | 3 | 51,679,520 | 17,226,507 | 10.15 | <0.001 |
X1 × X2 | 1 | 95,710 | 95,710 | 0.06 | 0.812 |
X1 × X3 | 1 | 8,809,578 | 8,809,578 | 5.19 | <0.023 |
X2 × X3 | 1 | 6,307,372 | 6,307,372 | 3.72 | 0.054 |
Error | 1990 | 3,375,951,088 | 1,696,458 | ||
Lack of fit | 1462 | 3,375,951,087 | 2,309,132 | 1.86 × 1010. | |
Pure error | 528 | 0 | 0 | ||
Total | 1999 | 40,657,462,030 | |||
S = 1302.48 | |||||
R2 = 91.7% | |||||
Square Fit R2 = 91.66% | |||||
Predictive Square R2 = 91.6% |
Genotype of Corn | Total Humidity | Crude Protein | Ethereal Extract | Crude Fiber | Carbohydrates | Kcal per 100 g (Dry Base) | Kcal per 100 g (Fresh Base) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (g) | (g) | |
Creole white | 90.20 ± 0.32 a | 15.30 ± 0.20 a | 3.20 ± 0.16 a | 0.12 ± 0.02 g | 76.20 ± 0.02 h | 395.30 ± 0.43 a | 38.60 ± 0.26 b |
Creole white-creamy | 90.40 ± 0.50 a | 10.20 ± 0.28 d | 3.30 ± 0.23 a | 0.12 ± 0.01 g | 81.20 ± 0.05 d | 395.70 ± 0.76 a | 37.90 ± 0.37 c |
Creole yellow | 89.90 ± 0.30 a | 12.80 ± 0.40 c | 2.20 ± 0.04 c | 0.19 ± 0.02 e | 79.40 ± 0.04 e | 389.70 ± 0.91 b | 39.20 ± 0.05 a |
Creole blue | 89.60 ± 0.17 a | 10.20 ± 0.16 e | 0.80 ± 0.04 f | 0.15 ± 0.02 f | 83.70 ± 0.02 a | 383.30 ± 0.37 e | 39.60 ± 0.34 a |
Asgrow Hawk | 89.50 ± 0.15 a | 10.60 ± 0.11 e | 0.60 ± 0.06 g | 0.67 ± 0.02 b | 83.40 ± 0.01 b | 382.20 ± 0.24 f | 39.90 ± 0.14 a |
Asgrow Sparrow-hawk | 90.70 ± 0.24 a | 11.30 ± 0.04 d | 1.80 ± 0.08 d | 0.48 ± 0.02 c | 81.50 ± 0.01 c | 388.40 ± 0.14 c | 36.00 ± 0.12 e |
Aspros AS-722 | 90.20 ± 0.17 a | 14.60 ± 0.18 b | 2.50 ± 0.02 b | 0.70 ± 0.01 a | 77.00 ± 0.02 g | 390.50 ± 0.42 b | 37.90 ± 0.21 c |
Hartz seed Z-60 | 90.30 ± 0.011 a | 14.30 ± 0.22 b | 1.50 ± 0.02 e | 0.44 ± 0.02 d | 78.90 ± 0.02 f | 386.60 ± 0.51 d | 37.10 ± 0.18 d |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Garcilazo Rahme, O.; Tello Salgado, I.; Mata, G.; Parraguirre Lezama, C.; Valencia de Ita, M.d.l.A.; Romero Arenas, O. Evaluation of Eight Genotypes of Corn for the Commercial Cultivation of Huitlacoche in Nopalucan, Puebla, Mexico. Agriculture 2020, 10, 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10110535
Garcilazo Rahme O, Tello Salgado I, Mata G, Parraguirre Lezama C, Valencia de Ita MdlA, Romero Arenas O. Evaluation of Eight Genotypes of Corn for the Commercial Cultivation of Huitlacoche in Nopalucan, Puebla, Mexico. Agriculture. 2020; 10(11):535. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10110535
Chicago/Turabian StyleGarcilazo Rahme, Omar, Isaac Tello Salgado, Gerardo Mata, Conrado Parraguirre Lezama, Maria de los Angeles Valencia de Ita, and Omar Romero Arenas. 2020. "Evaluation of Eight Genotypes of Corn for the Commercial Cultivation of Huitlacoche in Nopalucan, Puebla, Mexico" Agriculture 10, no. 11: 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10110535
APA StyleGarcilazo Rahme, O., Tello Salgado, I., Mata, G., Parraguirre Lezama, C., Valencia de Ita, M. d. l. A., & Romero Arenas, O. (2020). Evaluation of Eight Genotypes of Corn for the Commercial Cultivation of Huitlacoche in Nopalucan, Puebla, Mexico. Agriculture, 10(11), 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10110535