Effect of Straw Length, Stubble Height and Rotary Speed on Residue Incorporation by Rotary Tillage in Intensive Rice–Wheat Rotation System
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Description of the Test Bench and Tillage Tool
2.2. Residue Preparation
2.3. Experimental Design
2.4. Measurements
2.4.1. Residue Burying
2.4.2. Residue Distribution
- (A) Sample collection and measurement
- (B) Analysis of residue distribution
2.5. Data Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Effect of Straw Length on Residue Burying and Distribution
3.1.1. Residue Burying
3.1.2. Residue Distribution
3.2. Effect of Stubble Height on Residue Burying and Distribution
3.2.1. Residue Burying
3.2.2. Residue Distribution
3.3. Effect of Rotary Speed on Residue Burying and Distribution
3.3.1. Residue Burying
3.3.2. Residue Distribution
3.4. Discussion of Tillage Operation Effect on Residue Incorporation Using Field-Testing Bench
4. Conclusions
- (i)
- Straw length and stubble height had a significant effect on residue burying and distribution. The burying rate and spatial distribution quality of residue decreased with the increase in straw length and stubble height. The residue incorporation quality with a 30 mm straw length was better than other treatments, and the burying rate and CV were 94.5%, and 72.9%, respectively. There was an excellent residue incorporation quality with 50 mm stubble height, and the burying rate and CV were 90.2% and 73.2%, respectively.
- (ii)
- The lower rotary speed parameter buried less residue and dispersed it with worse uniformity than the higher one. Compared to the value at 240 rpm, the percent of burying residue could be increased by 5.6% at 320 rpm.
- (iii)
- Straw length, stubble height, and rotary speed all impact residue incorporation quality. It is suggested that farmers determine the straw length and stubble height at the stage of harvest according to the burying rate and distribution uniformity of residue. A higher speed of rotary tillage (320 rpm) is recommended, as higher speed can increase burying and distribution quality of residue.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Karandish, F. Applying grey water footprint assessment to achieve environmental sustainability within a nation under intensive agriculture: A high-resolution assessment for common agrochemicals and crops. Environ. Earth Sci. 2019, 78, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ittersum, V.; Martin, K. Crop Yields and Global Food Security. Will Yield Increase Continue to Feed the World? Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2016, 97, 191–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Yuan, W.; Zhang, R.; Xi, X. Multiple Leveling for Paddy Field Preparation with Double Axis Rotary Tillage Accelerates Rice Growth and Economic Benefits. Agriculture 2021, 11, 1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Z.; Chen, Y. Performance evaluation of fluted coulters and rippled discs for vertical tillage. Soil Tillage Res. 2018, 183, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torotwa, I.; Ding, Q.; Makange, N.R.; Liang, L.; He, R. Performance evaluation of a biomimetically designed disc for dense-straw mulched conservation tillage. Soil Tillage Res. 2021, 212, 105068–105077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Adnan, A.; Wang, X.; Yang, S.; Shi, Y. Study of the Mechanics and Micro-Structure of Wheat Straw Returned to Soil in Relation to Different Tillage Methods. Agronomy 2020, 10, 894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binod, P.; Sindhu, R.; Singhania, R.R.; Vikram, S.; Devi, L.; Nagalakshmi, S.; Kurien, N.; Sukumaran, R.K.; Pandey, A. Bioethanol production from rice straw: An overview. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 4767–4774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, H.; Zhao, W.; Li, T.; Cheng, X.; Liu, Q. Balancing straw returning and chemical fertilizers in China: Role of straw nutrient resources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 2695–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jane, J.; Veronica, A.M.; Cynthia, C.; Nancy, B. Crop and Soil Responses to Using Corn Stover as a Bioenergy Feedstock: Observations from the Northern US Corn Belt. Agriculture 2013, 3, 72–89. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, P.; Wei, T.; Li, Y.; Wang, K.; Jia, Z.; Han, Q.; Ren, X. Effects of straw incorporation on the stratification of the soil organic C, total N and C:N ratio in a semiarid region of China. Soil Tillage Res. 2015, 153, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vera, J.C.; Valeiro, A.; Posse, G.; Acreche, M.M. To burn or not to burn: The question of straw burning and nitrogen fertilization effect on nitrous oxide emissions in sugarcane. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 587, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiu, L.; Zhang, W.; Sun, Y.; Wu, D.; Meng, J.; Chen, W. Effects of biochar and straw returning on the key cultivation limitations of Albic soil and soybean growth over 2 years. Catena 2019, 173, 481–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Zhang, X.; Shao, L.; Sun, H.; Liu, X. Effects of straw and manure management on soil and crop performance in North China Plain. Catena 2019, 187, 104359–104369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Song, D.; Dang, P.; Wei, L.; Qin, X.; Siddique, K. Combined ditch buried straw return technology in a ridge-furrow plastic film mulch system: Implications for crop yield and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 199, 104596–104605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Gan, G.; Chen, X.; Zou, J. Effects of Long-Term Straw Management and Potassium Fertilization on Crop Yield, Soil Properties, and Microbial Community in a Rice–Oilseed Rape Rotation. Agriculture 2021, 11, 1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schomberg, H.H.; Steiner, J.L.; Unger, P.W. Decomposition and Nitrogen Dynamics of Crop Residues: Residue Quality and Water Effects. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1994, 58, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Latifmanesh, H.; Deng, A.; Li, L.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, W. How incorporation depth of corn straw affects straw decomposition rate and C&N release in the wheat-corn cropping system. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 300, 107000–107007. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Kushwaha, R.L. Effect of tillage speed and straw length on soil and straw movement by a sweep. Soil Tillage Res. 2010, 109, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, W.; Yang, Q.; Li, D.; Liu, Z.; Xia, J. Evaluation of straw spatial distribution after straw incorporation into soil for different tillage tools. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 196, 104440–104449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, P.L.; Dickey, D.D. Losses of Wheat Straw Residue under Simulated Field Conditions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1970, 34, 118–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guérif, J.; Richard, G.; Dürr, C.; Machet, J.M.; Recous, S.; Roger-Estrade, J. A review of tillage effects on crop residue management, seedbed conditions and seedling establishment. Soil Tillage Res. 2001, 61, 13–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, X.; Wei, L.; Turner, N.C.; Ma, S.; Yang, M.; Wang, T. Improved straw management practices promote in situ straw decomposition and nutrient release, and increase crop production. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 250, 119511–119514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sommer, R.; Ryan, J.; Masri, S.; Singh, M.; Diekmann, J. Effect of shallow tillage, moldboard plowing, straw management and compost addition on soil organic matter and nitrogen in a dryland barley/wheat-vetch rotation. Soil Tillage Res. 2011, 115, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Z.; Ma, X.; Chen, Y.; Qi, L. Modelling residue incorporation of selected chisel ploughing tools using the discrete element method (DEM). Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 197, 104505–104518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eltom, A.F.; Ding, W.; Ding, Q.; Tagar, A.A.; Talha, Z.; Gamareldawla. Field investigation of a trash-board, tillage depth and low speed effect on the displacement and burial of straw. Catena 2015, 133, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanna, H.M.; Melvin, S.W.; Pope, R.O. Tillage implement operational effects on residue cover. Appl. Eng. Agric. 1995, 11, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Ying, C.; Lobb, D.A.; Kushwaha, R.L. Soil-straw-tillage tool interaction: Field and soil bin study. Can. Biosyst. Eng. 2007, 49, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Davut, A.; Kamil, E. Rotary tiller velocity effects on the distribution of wheat (Triticum aestivum) residue in the soil profile. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2008, 36, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Na, L.; Li, Y.; Ping, C.; Jing, W.; Wei, G.; Pang, G.; Zhang, L. Depth of straw incorporation significantly alters crop yield, soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in the North China Plain. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 205, 104772–104781. [Google Scholar]
- Tao, Z.; Li, C.; Li, J.; Ding, Z.; Xu, J.; Sun, X.; Zhou, P.; Zhao, M. Tillage and straw mulching impacts on grain yield and water use efficiency of spring maize in Northern Huang–Huai–Hai Valley. Crop J. 2015, 6, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Prasad, R.; Gangaiah, B.; Aipe, K.C. Effect of crop residue management in a rice-wheat cropping system on growth and yield of crops and on soil fertility. Exp. Agric. 1999, 35, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Chandio, F.A.; Guo, J.; Sattar, A.; Arslan, C.; Ji, C. Effect of straw length and rotavator kinematic parameter on soil and straw movement by a rotary blade. Eng. Agric. Environ. Food. 2016, 9, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Z.; Chen, Y. Simulation of straw movement by discrete element modelling of straw-sweep-soil interaction. Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 180, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matin, M.A.; Hossain, M.I.; Gathala, M.K.; Timsina, J.; Krupnik, T.J. Optimal design and setting of rotary strip-tiller blades to intensify dry season cropping in Asian wet clay soil conditions. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 207, 104854–104864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, H.; Ji, C.; Tagar, A.A.; Zhang, Q.; Guo, J. Simulation analysis of straw movement in straw-soil-rotary blade system. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2016, 47, 60–67. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Adnan, A.; Wang, X.; Yang, S.; Shi, Y. Straw Incorporation Management Affects Maize Grain Yield through Regulating Nitrogen Uptake, Water Use Efficiency, and Root Distribution. Agronomy 2020, 10, 324. [Google Scholar]
Parameter | Value | |
---|---|---|
Soil | Texture | Clay loam (21.20, 39.67 and 38.96% sand, silt and clay, respectively) |
Cone index | 635, 1000, 987 kPa at 5, 10, and 15 cm depths, respectively | |
Moisture content | 22.6, 23.4, 24.8% at depth of 0–5, 5–10 and 10–15 cm, respectively | |
Dry bulk density | 1.29 g cm−3 | |
Straw | Straw length | 0–15 cm |
Stubble height | 0–20 cm | |
Wet density | 8012 kg ha−1 | |
Dry density | 3943 kg ha−1 |
Layer, mm | The Total Length of Residue, mm | The Proportion of Residue, mm | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 125 | 150 | 30 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 125 | 150 | |
UL (0–50) | 1081 ± 74 | 1274 ± 91 | 1501 ± 109 | 1575 ± 97 | 1650 ± 115 | 1815 ± 112 | 23.2 c | 28.3 c | 35.2 a | 38.1 a | 42.3 a | 47.3 a |
ML (0–100) | 1965 ± 139 | 1764 ± 124 | 1580 ± 102 | 1542 ± 91 | 1568 ± 106 | 1568 ± 93 | 42.1 a | 39.3 a | 37.1 a | 37.3 a | 40.2 a | 40.8 b |
LL (0–150) | 1617 ± 115 | 1458 ± 86 | 1181 ± 74 | 1017 ± 88 | 683 ± 59 | 456 ± 57 | 34.7 b | 32.4 b | 27.7 b | 24.6 b | 17.5 b | 11.9 c |
Layer, mm | The Total Length of Residue, mm | The Proportion of Residue, mm | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | |
UL (0–50) | 1302 ± 78 | 1502 ± 89 | 1663 ± 139 | 1813 ± 124 | 28.8 c | 33.6 b | 40.4 a | 44.2 a |
ML (50–100) | 1721 ± 123 | 1717 ± 126 | 1495 ± 128 | 1589 ± 83 | 38.1 a | 38.4 a | 36.3 a | 38.7 b |
LL(100–150) | 1494 ± 102 | 1251 ± 97 | 958 ± 77 | 704 ± 61 | 33.1 b | 28.0 c | 23.3 b | 17.1 c |
Layer, mm | The Total Length of Residue, mm | The Proportion of Residue, mm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
240 | 280 | 320 | 240 | 280 | 320 | |
UL (0–50) | 1413 ± 104 | 1301 ± 99 | 1204 ± 96 | 32.2 b | 28.8 c | 25.7 c |
ML (50–100) | 1617 ± 111 | 1723 ± 115 | 1839 ± 108 | 36.8 a | 38.1 a | 39.3 a |
LL (100–150) | 1362 ± 95 | 1495 ± 107 | 1641 ± 103 | 31.0 b | 33.1 b | 35.0 b |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Xu, G.; Xie, Y.; Matin, M.A.; He, R.; Ding, Q. Effect of Straw Length, Stubble Height and Rotary Speed on Residue Incorporation by Rotary Tillage in Intensive Rice–Wheat Rotation System. Agriculture 2022, 12, 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12020222
Xu G, Xie Y, Matin MA, He R, Ding Q. Effect of Straw Length, Stubble Height and Rotary Speed on Residue Incorporation by Rotary Tillage in Intensive Rice–Wheat Rotation System. Agriculture. 2022; 12(2):222. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12020222
Chicago/Turabian StyleXu, Gaoming, Yixuan Xie, Md. A. Matin, Ruiyin He, and Qishuo Ding. 2022. "Effect of Straw Length, Stubble Height and Rotary Speed on Residue Incorporation by Rotary Tillage in Intensive Rice–Wheat Rotation System" Agriculture 12, no. 2: 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12020222
APA StyleXu, G., Xie, Y., Matin, M. A., He, R., & Ding, Q. (2022). Effect of Straw Length, Stubble Height and Rotary Speed on Residue Incorporation by Rotary Tillage in Intensive Rice–Wheat Rotation System. Agriculture, 12(2), 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12020222