Evaluation of Pollen Production of Common Male Date Palms Grown in the Mexicali Valley, Mexico
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Characterization of the Experimental Area
2.2. Plant Material, Phenotypic Characterization of Male Trees and Pollen Extraction
2.3. Pollen Fresh Viability
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mostaan, A. Mechanization in Date Palm Pollination. In Dates: Production, Processing, Food, and Medicinal Values; Manickavasagan, A., Essa, M.M., Sukumar, E., Eds.; CRC Press: London, UK, 2012; pp. 129–140. ISBN 978-1-4398-4947-7. [Google Scholar]
- Salomón-Torres, R.; Krueger, R.; García-Vázquez, J.P.; Villa-Angulo, R.; Villa-Angulo, C.; Ortiz-Uribe, N.; Sol-Uribe, J.A.; Samaniego-Sandoval, L. Date palm pollen: Features, production, extraction and pollination methods. Agronomy 2021, 11, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wertheimer, M. La Pollination du palmier dattier (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Fruits 1957, 12, 305–313. [Google Scholar]
- Krueger, R.R. Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) biology and utilization. In The Date palm Genome: Volume 1: Compendium of Plant Genomes; Al-Khayri, J.M., Jain, S.M., Johnson, D.V., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 3–38. [Google Scholar]
- Chao, C.T.; Krueger, R.R. The Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.): Overview of Biology, Uses, and Cultivation. HortScience 2007, 42, 1077–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohan, S.K.; Kumar, M.; Muralidharan, C.M.; Salomón-Torres, R. Pollen and Pollination Management in Date palm. In Modern Date Palm Cultivation; Al-Khayri, J.M., Mohan-Jain, S., Johnson, D.V., Krueger, R.R., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Zaid, A.; Arias-Jimenez, E.J. Date Palm Cultivation; Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2002; ISBN 92-5-104863-0. [Google Scholar]
- Nixon, R.W. Metaxenia in Dates. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1956, 32, 221–226. [Google Scholar]
- Karim, K.; Awad, M.A.; Manar, A.; Monia, J.; Karim, A.; Mohammed, E. Effect of flowering stage and storage conditions on pollen quality of six male date palm genotypes. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 2564–2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nasr, T.A.; Shaheen, M.A.; Bacha, M.A. Evaluation of seedling male palm used in pollination in the central region of Saudi Arabia. Date Palm J. 1986, 4, 163174. [Google Scholar]
- Ortiz-Uribe, N.; Salomón-Torres, R.; Krueger, R. Date palm status and perspective in Mexico. Agriculture 2019, 9, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salomón-Torres, R.; Ortiz-Uribe, N.; Sol-Uribe, J.A.; Villa-Angulo, C.; Villa-Angulo, R.; Valdez-Salas, B.; García-González, C.; Iñiguez Monroy, C.G.; Norzagaray-Plasencia, S. Influence of different sources of pollen on the chemical composition of date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivar Medjool in México. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2018, 12, 1008–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salomón-Torres, R.; Ortiz-Uribe, N.; Valdez-Salas, B.; Rosas-González, N.; García-González, C.; Chávez, D.; Córdova-Guerrero, I.; Díaz-Rubio, L.; Haro-Vázquez, M.d.P.; Mijangos-Montiel, J.L.; et al. Nutritional assessment, phytochemical composition and antioxidant analysis of the pulp and seed of medjool date grown in Mexico. PeerJ 2019, 7, e6821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsafy, M.; Garkava-Gustavsson, L.; Mujaju, C. Phenotypic Diversity of Date Palm Cultivars (Phoenix dactylifera L.) from Sudan Estimated by Vegetative and Fruit Characteristics. Int. J. Biodivers. 2015, 2015, 610391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalilia, W.M.; Abuamsha, R.; Alqaddi, N.; Omari, A. Phenotypic Characterization of Local Date Palm Cultivars at Jericho in Palestinian Jordan Valley District. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2022, 15, 989–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bedjaoui, H.; Benbouza, H. Assessment of phenotypic diversity of local Algerian date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2020, 19, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Oliveira, M.d.S.P.; Maués, M.M.; de Andrade Kalume, M.A. Viabilidade de pólen in vivo e in vitro em genótipos de açaizeiro. Acta Bot. Bras. 2001, 15, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2019.
- Cohen, Y.; Glasner, B. Date Palm Status and Perspective in Israel. In Date Palm Genetic Resources and Utilization: Volume 2: Asia and Europe; Al-Khayri, J.M., Mohan, S., Johnson, D.V., Eds.; Springer: New York, USA, 2015; pp. 265–298. [Google Scholar]
- Dawoud, D.H. Evaluation of nine seedling date palm males, used in pollination and their metaxenic effect on two female cultivars (MWL) & (MWK) at new Halfa area. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Date Palms, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates, 25–27 March 2001; p. 6. [Google Scholar]
- Gasim, A.A. Comparative study of morphological characteristics of six seedling date palm and their effects on the yield of some date cultivars. In Proceedings of the Program & Abstract of the Third Symposium on Date Palm, Al-Hassa, Saudi Arabia, 17–20 January 1993; p. 181. [Google Scholar]
- Moustafa, A.A.; Ibrahim, Z.A.; El-Yazel, S.A.S.; El-Anwer, M.A. Evaluation and Selection of Some Seedling Date Palm Males Grown in Fayoum Governorate, Egypt. In Proceedings of the 4th International Date Palm Conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 15–17 March 2010; pp. 69–79. [Google Scholar]
- Nixon, R.W.; Carpenter, J.B. Growing Dates in the United States; United States Department of Agriculture Bulletin No. 207, USDA: Washington, DC, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- El-Amer, M.; Fayed, M.; Gehgah, M.; El-Hammady, A. Evaluation of different pollinators on fruit set and qualities of some date cultivars. In Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Date Palm, Al-Hassa, Saudi Arabia, 17–20 January 1993; pp. 247–260. [Google Scholar]
- Shaheen, M.A. Evaluation of date palm males using pollen viability and ultrastructure. Acta Hortic. 2004, 632, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shawky, B.A.; El-Sharabasy, S.F. Date Palm Status and Perspective in Egypt. In Date Palm Genetic Resources and Utilization: Volume 1: Africa and the Americas; Al-Khayri, J.M., Mohan, S., Johnson, D.V., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; p. 566. [Google Scholar]
- Krueger, R.R. Date Palm Status and Perspective in the United States. In Date Palm Genetic Resources and Utilization: Volume 1: Africa and the Americas; Al-Khayri, J.M., Jain, S.M., Johnson, D.V., Eds.; Springer: London, UK, 2015; pp. 447–485. [Google Scholar]
- Aramendiz-Tatis, H.; Cardona-Ayala, C.; Jarma-Orozco, A. Eficiencia de Dos Metodos para Evaluar la Viabilidad del Polen de Berenjena (Solanum melongena L. cv. Lila criolla). Rev. UDCA Actual. Divulg. Cient. 2013, 16, 351–358. [Google Scholar]
Cultivar | Leaf Length (cm) | Leaf Width (cm) | Middle Leaflet Length (cm) | Middle Leaflet Width (cm) | Middle Spine Length (cm) | Middle Spine Width (cm) | Spined Portion Length (cm) | Leaflet Number | Spine Number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Medjool | 304–376 | 65–82 | 50–64 | 2.8–3.4 | 11–16.5 | 0.5–0.8 | 57–88 | 143–156 | 20–30 |
Deglet Noor | 327–400 | 63–74 | 49–53 | 2.9–3.7 | 8.1–13.5 | 0.6–0.8 | 103–122 | 117–182 | 36–44 |
Khadrawy | 316–329 | 71–89 | 47–57 | 3.6–4.5 | 9.8–13.2 | 0.5–0.6 | 57–64 | 130–143 | 20–22 |
Zahidi | 443–468 | 57–64 | 46–52 | 2.7–3.7 | 5.2–7.6 | 0.6–0.7 | 90–120 | 117–133 | 28–32 |
Palm | Group | Phenotypic | Leaf Length (cm) | Leaf Width (cm) | Middle Leaflet Length (cm) | Middle Leaflet Width (cm) | Middle Spine Length (cm) | Middle Spine Width (cm) | Spined Portion Length (cm) | Leaflet Number | Spine Number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | G1 | Medjool | 308 | 72 | 52 | 3.4 | 13.7 | 0.7 | 61 | 147 | 24 |
P2 | G1 | Medjool | 348 | 71 | 55 | 3.2 | 12.4 | 0.5 | 73 | 156 | 26 |
P3 | G1 | Medjool | 354 | 80 | 63 | 3.2 | 12.3 | 0.5 | 66 | 152 | 21 |
P4 | G1 | Medjool | 337 | 76 | 57 | 3.3 | 12.8 | 0.6 | 69 | 150 | 29 |
P5 | G2 | Deglet Noor | 330 | 66 | 49 | 3.1 | 10.3 | 0.6 | 104 | 169 | 42 |
P6 | G2 | Deglet Noor | 397 | 69 | 50 | 3.1 | 9.1 | 0.7 | 105 | 180 | 37 |
P7 | G2 | Deglet Noor | 385 | 71 | 53 | 3.5 | 12.1 | 0.7 | 112 | 155 | 38 |
P8 | G3 | Khadrawy | 323 | 82 | 51 | 4.0 | 11.2 | 0.5 | 62 | 137 | 21 |
P9 | G3 | Khadrawy | 321 | 79 | 56 | 3.7 | 11.9 | 0.6 | 60 | 140 | 20 |
P10 | G3 | Khadrawy | 326 | 87 | 47 | 4.2 | 10.2 | 0.5 | 63 | 130 | 22 |
P11 | G4 | Zahidi | 450 | 61 | 48 | 3.1 | 6.7 | 0.6 | 108 | 120 | 30 |
P12 | G4 | Zahidi | 447 | 60 | 46 | 2.9 | 7.5 | 0.6 | 115 | 127 | 32 |
Palm | Inflorescences | Production Weight | Average per Inflorescence Weight | Flowering Period | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Number) | (g) | (g) | (days) | |||||
2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | |
P1 | 29 | 21 | 661.56 | 632.26 | 22.81 | 30.11 | 64 | 55 |
P2 | 25 | 22 | 870.11 | 832.06 | 34.8 | 37.82 | 50 | 65 |
P3 | 24 | 26 | 966.76 | 1049.89 | 40.28 | 40.38 | 56 | 69 |
P4 | 32 | 31 | 906.7 | 951.52 | 28.33 | 30.69 | 54 | 26 |
Average G1 | 27.5 ± 3.70 a | 25.0 ± 4.55 a | 851.28 ± 132.61 b | 866.43 ± 179.74 ab | 31.55 ± 7.61 ab | 34.75 ± 5.14 a | 56 ± 5.89 a | 54 ± 19.41 a |
P5 | 36 | 35 | 1353.27 | 1262.52 | 37.59 | 36.07 | 51 | 37 |
P6 | 31 | 26 | 1026.68 | 994.95 | 33.12 | 38.27 | 45 | 25 |
P7 | 27 | 25 | 1373 | 1085.32 | 50.85 | 43.41 | 46 | 33 |
Average G2 | 31.3 ± 4.51 a | 28.6 ± 5.51 a | 1250.98 ± 194.50 a | 1114.26 ± 136.11 a | 40.52 ± 9.22 a | 39.25 ± 3.77 a | 47 ± 3.21 a | 32 ± 6.11 a |
P8 | 21 | 19 | 278.11 | 322.18 | 13.24 | 16.96 | 34 | 27 |
P9 | 16 | 22 | 395 | 325.98 | 24.69 | 14.82 | 33 | 21 |
P10 | 16 | 23 | 217.78 | 382.52 | 13.61 | 16.63 | 20 | 42 |
Average G3 | 17.6 ± 2.89 b | 21.3 ± 2.08 a | 296.96 ± 90.1 c | 343.56 ± 33.79 c | 17.18 ± 6.51 b | 16.13 ± 1.15 b | 29 ± 7.81 b | 30 ± 10.82 a |
P11 | 26 | 17 | 484.89 | 546.1 | 18.65 | 32.12 | 59 | 35 |
P12 | 24 | 26 | 837.5 | 940.13 | 34.9 | 36.16 | 56 | 64 |
Average G4 | 25 ± 1.41 ab | 21.5 ± 6.36 a | 661.2 ± 249.33 b | 743.11 ± 278.62 b | 26.77 ± 11.49 ab | 34.14 ± 2.86 a | 57 ± 2.12 a | 49 ± 20.51 a |
Total | 307 | 293 | 9371.36 | 9325.43 | ||||
Average | 26 | 24 | 780.94 | 777.11 | 29.41 | 31.12 | 47 | 41 |
Palm | Weight (g) | First Harvest Date—Day Number | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | |
P1 | 33.19 | 34.68 | February 21–52 | January 29–29 |
P2 | 54.83 | 54.59 | March 3–62 | February 10–41 |
P3 | 59.21 | 40.94 | February 25–56 | February 5–36 |
P4 | 40.97 | 29.58 | March 3–62 | March 16–75 |
Average G1 | 47.05 ± 14.7 a | 39.94 ± 14.44 a | 58 ± 4.9c | 45 ± 20.43 b |
P5 | 50.11 | 35.99 | March 3–62 | March 10–69 |
P6 | 40.29 | 32.81 | March 9–68 | March 20–79 |
P7 | 46.77 | 33.03 | March 7–66 | March 15–74 |
Average G2 | 45.72 ± 11.82 a | 33.94 ± 9.64 a | 65 ± 3.06 b | 74 ± 5 a |
P8 | 20.61 | 20.29 | March 19–78 | March 21–80 |
P9 | 16.99 | 18.45 | March 20–79 | March 25–84 |
P10 | 21.03 | 25.45 | March 25–84 | March 2–61 |
Average G3 | 19.54 ± 4.97 b | 21.39 ± 4.54 b | 80 ± 3.21 a | 75 ± 12.29 a |
P11 | 34.22 | 25.47 | March 1–60 | February 17–48 |
P12 | 46.23 | 39.4 | March 3–62 | February 3–34 |
Average G4 | 40.22 ± 16.2 a | 32.43 ± 15.36 a | 61 ± 1.41 bc | 41 ± 9.9 b |
Average | 38.7 | 32.55 | 66 | 59 |
Palm | Weight (g) | Harvest Date—Day Number | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | |
P1 | 2.99 | 20.6 | April 26–116 | March 25–84 |
P2 | 11.94 | 11.07 | April 22–112 | April 15–105 |
P3 | 22.37 | 31.27 | April 22–112 | April 13–103 |
P4 | 9.28 | 15.88 | April 26–116 | April 15–105 |
Average G1 | 11.65 ± 8.07 a | 19.7 ± 8.64 a | 114 ± 2.31 ab | 99 ± 10.21 a |
P5 | 11.36 | 31.79 | April 23–113 | April 15–105 |
P6 | 16.67 | 19.75 | April 23–113 | April 14–104 |
P7 | 12.45 | 22.79 | April 22–112 | April 18–108 |
Average G2 | 13.49 ± 2.80 a | 24.77 ± 6.26 a | 113 ± 0.58 bc | 106 ± 2.08 a |
P8 | 8.74 | 13.26 | April 20–110 | April 17–107 |
P9 | 7.26 | 11.42 | April 22–112 | April 15–105 |
P10 | 5.37 | 16.87 | April 14–104 | April 13–103 |
Average G3 | 7.12 ± 1.69 a | 13.85 ± 2.77 a | 109 ± 4.16 c | 105 ± 2.08 a |
P11 | 5.67 | 10.03 | April 28–118 | March 24–83 |
P12 | 14.3 | 14.69 | April 28–118 | April 8–98 |
Average G4 | 9.98 ± 6.1 a | 12.36 ± 3.3 a | 118 ± 4.16 a | 90 ± 2 a |
Average | 10.7 | 18.28 | 113 | 100 |
Group | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|
G1 | 52.04 ± 8.26 b | 68.64 ± 9.7 b |
G2 | 66.99 ± 7.72 a | 73.32 ± 9.87 a |
G3 | 54.24 ± 14.74 ab | 67.39 ± 15.83 ab |
G4 | 52.24 ± 8.15 b | 63.48 ± 9.16 b |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Salomón-Torres, R.; Ortiz-Uribe, N.; Krueger, R.; García-Vázquez, J.P.; Cohen, Y.; Wright, G.C.; Samaniego-Sandoval, L. Evaluation of Pollen Production of Common Male Date Palms Grown in the Mexicali Valley, Mexico. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081248
Salomón-Torres R, Ortiz-Uribe N, Krueger R, García-Vázquez JP, Cohen Y, Wright GC, Samaniego-Sandoval L. Evaluation of Pollen Production of Common Male Date Palms Grown in the Mexicali Valley, Mexico. Agriculture. 2022; 12(8):1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081248
Chicago/Turabian StyleSalomón-Torres, Ricardo, Noé Ortiz-Uribe, Robert Krueger, Juan Pablo García-Vázquez, Yuval Cohen, Glenn C. Wright, and Laura Samaniego-Sandoval. 2022. "Evaluation of Pollen Production of Common Male Date Palms Grown in the Mexicali Valley, Mexico" Agriculture 12, no. 8: 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081248
APA StyleSalomón-Torres, R., Ortiz-Uribe, N., Krueger, R., García-Vázquez, J. P., Cohen, Y., Wright, G. C., & Samaniego-Sandoval, L. (2022). Evaluation of Pollen Production of Common Male Date Palms Grown in the Mexicali Valley, Mexico. Agriculture, 12(8), 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081248