Opportunities to Breed Diverse Sweetpotato Varieties for California Organic Production
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Agronomic Trials
2.2. Culinary Evaluations
2.3. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Agronomic Traits
3.2. Culinary Traits
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wei, H.; Goodhue, R.; Muramoto, J.; Sumner, D. Statistical Review of California’s Organic Agriculture 2013–2016; California Department of Food and Agriculture: Sacramento, CA, USA, 2022.
- CDFA. California Agricultural Statistics Review 2021–2022; California Department of Food and Agriculture: Sacramento, CA, USA, 2023; p. 157.
- Nwosisi, S.; Illukpitiya, P.; Nandwani, D.; Arebi, I.T.; Nwosisi, O. Organic and conventional sweetpotato production in the Southeastern of United States: A comparative analysis. Agric. Food Secur. 2021, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- USDA. National Agricultural Statistics Service Data. 2021. Available online: https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/ (accessed on 16 November 2023).
- Truong, V.; Avula, R.; Pecota, K.; Yencho, G. Sweetpotato production, processing, and nutritional quality. In Handbook of Vegetables and Vegetable Processing; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 811–838. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, W.; Yan, P.; Shi, T.; Lu, P.; Zhao, W.; Yang, H.; Zeng, L.; Yang, J.; Li, Z.; Fan, W. Modulation of anthocyanin accumulation in storage roots of sweetpotato by transcription factor IbMYB1-2 through direct binding to anthocyanin biosynthetic gene promoters. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 196, 868–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.-X.; Wei, Z.-Z.; Zhou, Z.-L.; Zhao, D.-L.; Tang, J.; Yang, F.; Li, Y.-H.; Chen, X.-Y.; Han, Z.; Yao, G.-F. A single amino acid mutant in the EAR motif of IbMYB44. 2 reduced the inhibition of anthocyanin accumulation in the purple-fleshed sweetpotato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 167, 410–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Truong, V.; Hu, Z.; Thompson, R.; Yencho, G.; Pecota, K. Pressurized liquid extraction and quantification of anthocyanins in purple-fleshed sweet potato genotypes. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2012, 26, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Truong, V.-D.; Deighton, N.; Thompson, R.T.; McFeeters, R.F.; Dean, L.O.; Pecota, K.V.; Yencho, G.C. Characterization of anthocyanins and anthocyanidins in purple-fleshed sweetpotatoes by HPLC-DAD/ESI-MS/MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 404–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rolston, L.; Clark, C.; Cannon, J.; Randle, W.; Riley, E.; Wilson, P.; Robbins, M. Beauregard’sweet potato. HortScience 1987, 22, 1338–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoddard, C.S.; Davis, R.M.; Cantwell, M. Sweetpotato Production in California; Vegetable Production Series, Publication 7237; University of California Vegetable Research and Information Center, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources: Richmond, CA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Yencho, G.C.; Pecota, K.V.; Schultheis, J.R.; VanEsbroeck, Z.-P.; Holmes, G.J.; Little, B.E.; Thornton, A.C.; Truong, V.-D. ‘Covington’sweetpotato. HortScience 2008, 43, 1911–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- LaBonte, D.R.; Clark, C.A.; Smith, T.P.; Villordon, A.Q.; Stoddard, C.S. ‘Vermillion’Sweetpotato. HortScience 2021, 56, 979–981. [Google Scholar]
- LaBonte, D.R.; Villordon, A.Q.; Clark, C.A.; Wilson, P.W.; Stoddard, C.S. ‘Murasaki-29’sweetpotato. HortScience 2008, 43, 1895–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsu, C.M. Garden of the World: Asian Immigrants and the Making of Agriculture in California’s Santa Clara Valley; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Garcia, M. From the Jaws of Victory: The Triumph and Tragedy of Cesar Chavez and the Farm Worker Movement; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Daniels, R. Asian America: Chinese and Japanese in the United States since 1850; University of Washington Press: Siettle, WA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Roullier, C.; Duputié, A.; Wennekes, P.; Benoit, L.; Fernández Bringas, V.M.; Rossel, G.; Tay, D.; McKey, D.; Lebot, V. Disentangling the origins of cultivated sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz-Rodríguez, P.; Carruthers, T.; Wood, J.R.; Williams, B.R.; Weitemier, K.; Kronmiller, B.; Ellis, D.; Anglin, N.L.; Longway, L.; Harris, S.A. Reconciling conflicting phylogenies in the origin of sweet potato and dispersal to Polynesia. Curr. Biol. 2018, 28, 1246–1256.e1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Austin, D.F. The taxonomy, evolution and genetic diversity of sweet potatoes and related wild species. In Exploration, Maintenance, and Utilization of Sweetpotato Genetic Resources; International Potato Center: Lima, Peru, 1988; pp. 27–60. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, D.; Cervantes, J.; Huamán, Z.; Carey, E.; Ghislain, M. Assessing genetic diversity of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) cultivars from tropical America using AFLP. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2000, 47, 659–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Z.; Yao, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zou, H.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Fang, B.; Huang, L. Genetic fingerprint construction and genetic diversity analysis of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) germplasm resources. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Montenegro, Á.; Avis, C.; Weaver, A. Modeling the prehistoric arrival of the sweet potato in Polynesia. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2008, 35, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roullier, C.; Benoit, L.; McKey, D.B.; Lebot, V. Historical collections reveal patterns of diffusion of sweet potato in Oceania obscured by modern plant movements and recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 2205–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wadl, P.A.; Olukolu, B.A.; Branham, S.E.; Jarret, R.L.; Yencho, G.C.; Jackson, D.M. Genetic diversity and population structure of the USDA sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) germplasm collections using GBSpoly. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- FAOSTAT. Yield Production Data. 2022. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed on 16 November 2023).
- de Mendiburu, F. Package ‘agricolae’, R Package, version 2019, 1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2019.
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Wickham, H. ggplot2. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2011, 3, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nwosisi, S.; Nandwani, D.; Hui, D.; Ravi, R. Sensory evaluation of organic sweetpotato cultivars. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 2017, 23, 536–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variety | Root Flesh Color | Root Skin Color | Proportion Medium | Proportion No. 1 | Proportion Jumbo | Marketable Yield (kg/ha) | Yield Significance Groups |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diane | Orange | Red | 0.33 | 0.45 | 0.22 | 51,028 | a |
O’Henry | White | Cream | 0.27 | 0.58 | 0.15 | 43,444 | ab |
Viola | Orange | Red | 0.44 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 40,726 | abc |
Seon-Mi | White | Cream | 0.09 | 0.35 | 0.56 | 40,001 | abc |
Beauregard | Orange | Orange | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.50 | 39,775 | abc |
Murasaki | White | Burgundy | 0.17 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 37,788 | abc |
L-19-18 | Orange | Red | 0.25 | 0.49 | 0.26 | 36,601 | abc |
L-19-42 | Orange | Orange | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.08 | 34,688 | abc |
L-19-15 | Orange | Red | 0.52 | 0.38 | 0.10 | 31,498 | abc |
Carolina Ruby | Orange | Red | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.30 | 29,191 | bcd |
Morado | White | Burgundy | 0.27 | 0.51 | 0.22 | 27,149 | bcde |
L-19-56-P | Purple | Purple | 0.26 | 0.61 | 0.13 | 27,138 | bcde |
L-14-11 | Orange | Red | 0.35 | 0.6 | 0.05 | 25,909 | bcde |
Covington | Orange | Orange | 0.15 | 0.47 | 0.38 | 25,589 | bcde |
L-17-189 | Orange | Red | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 24,572 | bcde |
L-15-39 | White | Burgundy | 0.40 | 0.49 | 0.11 | 21,520 | cde |
Red Japanese | White | Burgundy | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 21,077 | cde |
L-17-182 | Orange | Red | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.02 | 20,468 | cde |
Vermillion | Orange | Red | 0.29 | 0.51 | 0.20 | 19,106 | cde |
Hopi | Orange | Orange | 0.80 | 0.2 | 0.00 | 18,109 | cde |
L-19-53-P | Purple | Purple | 0.61 | 0.31 | 0.08 | 13,551 | cde |
Camote Morado | White | Burgundy | 0.16 | 0.61 | 0.23 | 12,635 | cde |
Becca’s Purple | Purple | Purple | 0.43 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 11,913 | cde |
All Purple | Purple | Purple | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 11,037 | cde |
Dingess Purple | Purple | Purple | 0.47 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 10,994 | cde |
F1 Bonita × Diane | Variable | Variable | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.61 | 9688 | cde |
Purple-01 | White | Purple | 0.37 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 9438 | cde |
Molokai Purple | Purple | Purple | 0.12 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 9155 | cde |
Shore Gold | Orange | Orange | 0.57 | 0.32 | 0.11 | 8360 | cde |
Waimanalo | White | Burgundy | 0.14 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 8288 | de |
Yellow Sunflower | Light yellow | Orange | 0.17 | 0.28 | 0.55 | 8239 | de |
Porto Rico USDA | Orange | Orange | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 7789 | de |
Nancy Hall | Orange | Red | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 6998 | de |
Kekori | White | Cream | 0.26 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 6199 | de |
Nam Hai | Purple | Purple | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5924 | de |
Hayman | White | Cream | 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 3363 | e |
F1 Diane × Red Japanese | Variable | Variable | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2719 | e |
Red Jewel | Red | Orange | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1859 | e |
Okinawa Purple | Light purple | Cream | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 535 | e |
Amish Red | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | e |
F1 Diane × Bonita | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | e |
Markham | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | e |
Tonga | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | e |
Vardaman | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | e |
Variety | Flavor | Significance Groups (LSD) 1 |
---|---|---|
L-19-53-P | 3.62 | a |
Okinawa Purple | 3.60 | a |
Murasaki | 3.45 | ab |
Covington | 3.34 | ab |
Red Japanese | 3.20 | ab |
All Purple | 3.09 | ab |
Diane | 3.00 | b |
L-19-56-P | 3.00 | bc |
L-15-39 | 2.28 | c |
Variety | Appearance | Significance Groups (LSD) 1 |
---|---|---|
Covington | 4.19 | a |
Diane | 3.97 | a |
All Purple | 3.82 | a |
L-15-39 | 3.05 | b |
L19-56-P | 3.00 | bc |
L-19-53-P | 2.93 | bc |
Okinawa Purple | 2.93 | bc |
Red Japanese | 2.67 | bc |
Murasaki | 2.25 | c |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Parker, T.; Leach, K.; Stoddard, C.S.; Roser, L.; Palkovic, A.; Williams, T.; Lo, S.; Gepts, P.; La Bonte, D.; Chung, G.Y.; et al. Opportunities to Breed Diverse Sweetpotato Varieties for California Organic Production. Agriculture 2023, 13, 2191. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13122191
Parker T, Leach K, Stoddard CS, Roser L, Palkovic A, Williams T, Lo S, Gepts P, La Bonte D, Chung GY, et al. Opportunities to Breed Diverse Sweetpotato Varieties for California Organic Production. Agriculture. 2023; 13(12):2191. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13122191
Chicago/Turabian StyleParker, Travis, Kristyn Leach, C. Scott Stoddard, Laura Roser, Antonia Palkovic, Troy Williams, Sassoum Lo, Paul Gepts, Don La Bonte, Ga Young Chung, and et al. 2023. "Opportunities to Breed Diverse Sweetpotato Varieties for California Organic Production" Agriculture 13, no. 12: 2191. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13122191
APA StyleParker, T., Leach, K., Stoddard, C. S., Roser, L., Palkovic, A., Williams, T., Lo, S., Gepts, P., La Bonte, D., Chung, G. Y., & Brummer, E. C. (2023). Opportunities to Breed Diverse Sweetpotato Varieties for California Organic Production. Agriculture, 13(12), 2191. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13122191