Next Article in Journal
Drivable Agricultural Road Region Detection Based on Pixel-Level Segmentation with Contextual Representation Augmentation
Next Article in Special Issue
Research on Differential Steering Dynamics Control of Four-Wheel Independent Drive Electric Tractor
Previous Article in Journal
Classification of Urban Agricultural Functional Regions and Their Carbon Effects at the County Level in the Pearl River Delta, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design and Experiment of Sweet Potato Ridging and Forming Machine
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Results of Experimental Studies of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of an Elastic-Plastic Material for Tribological Properties during Separation

Agriculture 2023, 13(9), 1735; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091735
by Alexey Dorokhov, Otari Didmanidze, Alexander Aksenov, Alexey Sibirev *, Maxim Mosyakov, Nikolay Sazonov and Maria Godyaeva
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Agriculture 2023, 13(9), 1735; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091735
Submission received: 16 July 2023 / Revised: 25 August 2023 / Accepted: 30 August 2023 / Published: 1 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agricultural Machinery Design and Agricultural Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 In this paper ,a methodology and algorithm for performing actions to study the effect of tubers injury when interacting with a cleaning device, as well as to assess the effect of the separation process on the tribological  properties of soil clod has been studied,.The research fall in the scope of the journal.

1.More deep analysis is needed to the introductoin part, there are just very less papers have been cited. The authors are asked to explain its main idea.

2.Some figures are need to add some notes to explain the main parts, the figure 2 has a poor quality, a new figure has to be added to replace it. for figure 3, each subfigure should have their own horizontal and vertical coordinates. For figure 7 & 8, the fitted  should not be appeared in the figure.The tables also have to revise according to the journal standar. the figure 9 also should have to revise to avoid overlapping.

3. 1600...1700 should be 1600-1700? others like 1300...1400, 22...24% also have to revise.

4.More journal referecnes have to cite.

5.The title of paper is too long.

 

Author Response

  1. More deep analysis is needed to the introductoin part, there are just very less papers have been cited. The authors are asked to explain its main idea

Reviewer â„– 1, Remark â„– 1: The remark has been corrected, an in-depth analysis of the introductory part has been performed, articles have been additionally cited.

  1. Some figures are need to add some notes to explain the main parts, the figure 2 has a poor quality, a new figure has to be added to replace it. for figure 3, each subfigure should have their own horizontal and vertical coordinates. For figure 7 & 8, the fitted  should not be appeared in the figure.The tables also have to revise according to the journal standar. the figure 9 also should have to revise to avoid overlapping.

Reviewer â„– 1, Remark â„– 2: Note corrected.

  1. ..1700 should be 1600-1700? others like 1300...1400, 22...24% also have to revise.

Reviewer â„– 1, Remark â„– 3: Note corrected.

  1. More journal referecnes have to cite.

Reviewer â„– 1, Remark â„– 4: Added links to magazines.

  1. The title of paper is too long

Reviewer â„– 1, Remark â„– 5: Note corrected: «The results of experimental studies of the physical and me-chanical properties of an elastic-plastic material for tribological properties during separation»

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript was discussed the effect of tubers injury when interacting with cleaning device and the separation process on the tribological properties of soil clods. The manuscript was useful and meaningful. However, the manuscript needs to be improved before publish.

Line 20- Change the expression ‘22…24%’ to 22-24% and other similar expressions.

Line 32- Please added the reference for this sentence.

Figure 1- Please added number 1, 2, 3, 4……, 10 in the Figure 1 to clear which is frame, container for preliminary placement of a heap……

Figure 2- Delete the light spot in Figure 2.

Line 114-Does the Figure 2.3 right?

Line 124-Does the Figure 2.1 right?

Line 155-158 Please revise this sentence.

Line 171 and 172 Change the ‘A.A. Sorokina, N.A. Kachinsky, B.A. Kina’ to Sorokina A.A. Kachinsky N.A. and Kina B.A.. Furthermore, it needs some references for this sentence and Line 178.

Table 3- The fourth, fifth, and sixth columns shared the same value with different units. Please delete two of them and keep one column. Furthermore, please add necessary explanations to the data in Table 3.

How many times did you repeat the experiments? The values of experiments should express as meanSTD.

Table 4 and Figure 7 shared the same data, please delete one of them.

Please added error bar for Figure 7, 8, ……14.

Figure 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 need to be improve.

Some sentence need to be improved.

Author Response

  1. Line 20- Change the expression ‘22…24%’ to 22-24% and other similar expressions.

Reviewer â„– 2, Remark â„– 1: Note corrected.

  1. Line 32- Please added the reference for this sentence.

Reviewer â„– 2, Remark â„– 2: Note corrected.

  1. Figure 1- Please added number 1, 2, 3, 4……, 10 in the Figure 1 to clear which is frame, container for preliminary placement of a heap.

Reviewer â„– 2, Remark â„– 3: Note corrected. Added numbers in the picture

  1. Figure 2- Delete the light spot in Figure 2.

Reviewer â„– 2, Remark â„– 4: Note corrected. Light spot removed

  1. Line 114-Does the Figure 2.3 right?

Reviewer â„– 2, Remark â„– 5: Note corrected.

  1. Line 124-Does the Figure 2.1 right?

Reviewer â„– 2, Remark â„– 6: Note corrected.

  1. Line 155-158 Please revise this sentence.

Reviewer â„– 2, Remark â„– 7: Note corrected.

  1. Line 171 and 172 Change the ‘A.A. Sorokina, N.A. Kachinsky, B.A. Kina’ to Sorokina A.A. Kachinsky N.A. and Kina B.A.. Furthermore, it needs some references for this sentence and Line 178.

Reviewer â„– 2, Remark â„– 8: Note corrected.

  1. Table 3- The fourth, fifth, and sixth columns shared the same value with different units. Please delete two of them and keep one column. Furthermore, please add necessary explanations to the data in Table 3.

Reviewer â„– 2, Remark â„– 9: Note corrected.

  1. How many times did you repeat the experiments? The values of experiments should express as mean

Reviewer â„– 2, Remark â„– 10: The remark has been eliminated, the values of the experiments are expressed as the mean STD.

  1. Table 4 and Figure 7 shared the same data, please delete one of them.

Reviewer â„– 2, Remark â„– 11: Note corrected, duplication removed in Table 4 and Figure 7.

  1. Please added error bar for Figure 7, 8, ……14.

Reviewer â„– 2, Remark â„– 12: Added error panel for Figures 7-14.

  1. Figure 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 need to be improve.

Reviewer â„– 2, Remark â„– 13: Figures 9-14 corrected.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Figure 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 need to be improve.

Author Response

Figures 10-15 have been finalized

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop