Next Article in Journal
Fermentation Profile, Bacterial Community Structure, Co-Occurrence Networks, and Their Predicted Functionality and Pathogenic Risk in High-Moisture Italian Ryegrass Silage
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of P Reduction on phoD-Harboring Bacteria Community in Solar Greenhouse Soil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biocontrol Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis Strain 00-50-5 Against the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii in Pepper

by
Yanfang Sun
1,
Yuan Guo
1,
Yueling Pei
1,
Yuan Chen
1,
Tuizi Feng
1 and
Haibo Long
1,2,*
1
Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Tropical Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
2
Hainan Key Laboratory for Monitoring and Control of Tropical Agricultural Pests, Haikou 571101, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2024, 14(11), 1920; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111920
Submission received: 19 September 2024 / Revised: 24 October 2024 / Accepted: 28 October 2024 / Published: 29 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Protection, Diseases, Pests and Weeds)

Abstract

:
The root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii is a major constraint to pepper production in tropical regions. In the long-term practice of root-knot nematode management, bacterial nematicides have attracted increasing attention as effective biocontrol agents. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis strain 00-50-5 (Bt 00-50-5) against M. enterolobii through in vitro, greenhouse and field trials. The cell-free supernatant of Bt 00-50-5 exhibited potent nematicidal activity against second-stage juveniles (J2s) of M. enterolobii, with mortality rates of 98.0% and 100% after 24 h and 36 h of exposure, respectively. In addition, Bt 00-50-5 showed inhibitory effects on the hatching of M. enterolobii eggs, resulting in a remarkable 96.6% reduction in the egg hatching rate after 6 days compared to the control. The pot trials showed that both pepper root galls and egg masses were reduced, and plant growth was improved after treatment with Bt 00-50-5. The field trials showed that the gall index was significantly reduced, with a 66.3% and 68.2% reduction in disease index in 2020–2021 and 2021–2022, respectively, and pepper yield was improved, with a 96.2% and 93.1% increase in yield in 2020–2021 and 2021–2022, respectively, compared to the control. These results indicate the potential use of Bt 00-50-5 as an effective biocontrol agent against M. enterolobii.

1. Introduction

Root-knot nematodes (RKN, Meloidogyne spp.) are considered one of the most pathogenic plant-parasitic nematodes, threatening more than 3000 plants and causing an average yield loss of 10% in vegetable crops [1]. Among the nearly 100 described species of RKNs, M. enterolobii is considered to be one of the most damaging species due to its ability to infect and reproduce on host plants that are resistant to the major tropical RKN species, such as M. incognita, M. javanica and M. arenaria [2,3]. M. enterolobii was first described in 1983 from the roots of Pacara earpod trees on Hainan Island in China and is widespread across tropical regions in Africa, Europe and the Americas [4,5]. This nematode is particularly damaging to many important Solanaceae crops such as tomato, eggplant and pepper. In southern China, which belongs to the tropical regions, M. enterolobii is considered to be the major limiting factor in vegetable production and is now the most widespread and dominant RKN species in pepper growing areas of Hainan, China [6].
RKN has a wide host range, and the availability of resistant cultivars is limited, making it difficult to control. In recent decades, RKN control has relied primarily on chemical nematicides, such as soil fumigants, carbamates and organophosphates [7]. However, safety and environmental concerns have limited the use of chemical nematicides such as aldicarb in many countries due to their high environmental toxicity [8]. In addition, the high cost of chemicals and the induction of pest resistance to these chemicals with repeated use are major concerns [9]. As a result, chemical nematicides are no longer considered to be an ideal way to control RKN. Meanwhile, biological control is attracting attention as a safer alternative to chemical nematicides. In recent years, beneficial microorganisms have gained considerable attention as biocontrol agents for pest management [10,11]. These include microbial insecticides, bactericides, agricultural antibiotics, and other similar agents. They are characterized by their specificity and selectivity [12,13,14]. Among these microbial pesticides, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), a Gram-positive soil bacterium that produces a variety of crystal proteins, is widely used to control a wide range of insect orders, nematodes, mites, protozoa and even human cancer cells [15]. It is also recognized as the most widely used microbial pesticide in the world. The toxicity of Bt to plant-parasitic nematodes was first demonstrated in 1972, with the thuringiensin (Thu) or β-exotoxin it produces having an inhibitory effect on M. incognita [16]. Subsequently, Cry proteins produced by some Bt strains, such as Cry5, Cry6, Cry13, Cry14, Cry21 and Cry55, were reported to be virulent against root-knot nematodes [17,18]. These studies suggest that Cry proteins are important virulence factors in the control of RKN. In addition, metalloproteinases and chitinases produced by Bt act in concert to enhance the virulence of the Cry proteins, making them an important component of virulence factors for Bt [19].
Recently, some studies have shown that beyond crystal proteins, other virulence factors produced by Bt strains are toxic to RKN. Cyclic dipeptide produced by Bt strain MB751 showed significant nematicidal activity against M. incognita [20]. Cyclo (D-Pro-L-Leu) produced by bacterial culture supernatant and crude extract of B. amyloliquefaciens strain Y1 inhibited egg hatching and caused juvenile mortality against M. incognita in vitro and in vivo on tomato [21]. Bt7N crude suspension (CS) and cell-free supernatant (CFS) could reduce the number of egg masses and eggs of M. incognita in tomato plants compared to a control [22]. TAA from the Bt strain CT-43 exhibited lethal activity against Caenorhabditis elegans, M. incognita and soybean cyst nematode [23]. Thus, these strains, which have the ability to produce toxic compounds with different chemical structures and properties, offer a good direction for finding more biocontrol resources.
In our previous study, a Bt strain 00-50-5 (Bt 00-50-5), isolated from sunflower head extract, was found to be highly toxic to lepidopteran insects such as Cochylis hospes and Trichoplusia ni [24,25]. To further extend the applicability of this Bt strain against plant-parasitic nematodes, we evaluated its nematicidal activity both in vitro and under greenhouse and field conditions to determine its potential biocontrol efficacy in cell-free supernatant (CFS) and bacterial culture against M. enterolobii. This comprehensive approach provides valuable insights into the practical applicability of Bt 00-50-5 as a sustainable alternative to chemical nematicides, potentially transforming nematode management practices in tropical regions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacteria Culture

Bacillus thuringiensis 00-50-5 was isolated from sunflower head extract in a previous study [25] and stored in glycerol at −80 °C. Bt 00-50-5 was inoculated and cultured on nutrient agar (NA) in a Petri dish for 24 h at 30 °C. Subsequently, it was transferred to 500 mL flasks containing 100 mL of liquid broth (LB) as the culture medium and incubated for 8 to 12 h at 30 °C on an incubator shaker. Cultures in the mid-logarithmic growth phase were then transferred to 400 mL of nutrient broth (NB) in 1 L flasks and shaken at 200 rpm in the dark for 3 days. At this stage, the concentration was approximately 2 × 108 CFU/mL. The cultures were then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants were filtered through Whatman No. 6 filter paper, and a syringe filter (0.22 μm) was subsequently used to remove any remaining bacterial cells. This final product was considered to be 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5.

2.2. Nematode Extraction and Hatching

M. enterolobii was first collected from Wenchang City, Hainan Province, China, identified in the laboratory, and cultured on tomato plants from a single egg mass. After 45 days, the roots of infected plants were carefully cleaned, cut into 1–2 cm slices and macerated in 0.05% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution. The mixture was stirred for 5 min using an electric blender to break up the egg mass matrix. The supernatant was then poured through a 30 μm diameter sieve mesh and rinsed several times with sterilized water. M. enterolobii eggs were obtained as described by Hussey and Barker [26]. The eggs were transferred to a funnel and allowed to hatch into second-stage juveniles (J2s), and freshly hatched J2s were used for experiments on the same day.

2.3. In Vitro Mortality Assay

M. enterolobii J2s were prepared in sterile distilled water. A suspension of 10 μL containing approximately 200 J2s, together with 1.3 mL of fermentation filtrate and NB medium, was added to each sterilized 1.5 cm diameter plastic dish. NB medium was used as a control. After 12, 24, and 36 h of treatment, the J2s were rinsed and transferred to distilled water, and 4 h later, J2 mortality was measured using a stereomicroscope (25×) (PXS-EX, Shanghai, China). Nematodes were considered dead if they remained straight, stiff and immotile when agitated with a fine hair needle [27]. Morphological images were captured using a light microscope (40×) (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) after 24 h. The experiment was conducted in triplicate and each treatment was repeated three times. J2 mortality was calculated using Equation (1):
  J 2   mortality   % = Number   of   dead   J 2 s   Total   number   of   J 2 s ×   100  

2.4. In Vitro Inhibition of Egg Hatching Assay

M. enterolobii eggs were obtained from mature egg masses and purified using the centrifugal/sugar flotation technique [28]. The egg suspension was then washed thoroughly with sterilized water prior to use in the bioassay to remove any potential microbial contamination. Subsequently, 10 μL of the egg suspension (containing 100–300 eggs) and 1.3 mL of fermentation filtrate were added to a sterilized plastic dish with a diameter of 1.5 cm. The NB medium was used as a control. The plate was then covered with Parafilm (Bemis, Sheboygan Falls, WI, USA) and sealed. An inverted microscope (Ni-E, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) was used to observe the hatching of the eggs after 2, 4, and 6 days. To assess the ovicidal properties of Bt 00-50-5 fermentation, unhatched eggs were placed in distilled water for further observation [29]. Each treatment was replicated three times to ensure the accuracy of the results. The cumulative hatching rate was calculated using Equation (2):
Egg   hatching   rate   ( % ) =   Number   of   hatched   J 2 s Total   number   of   eggs ×   100  

2.5. Pot Trials

The pot experiment was conducted with pepper plants (Capsicum annuum CV. Changfeng, susceptible to M. enterolobii). Four-week-old pepper seedlings were transplanted into 8 cm diameter plastic pots containing 500 g of soil, sand and vermiculite in a 2:1:1 ratio. Before use, the soil mixtures were dry-autoclaved at 180 °C for 120 min to eliminate indigenous microbes. Each treatment consisted of eight replicates, with each replicate containing one pepper plant. The pots were arranged in a randomized block design and maintained in a greenhouse under ambient light at 25 ± 2 °C.
One week after transplanting, four treatments were applied: bacterial fermentation broth (2 × 108 CFU/mL) at full strength (100%) and dilutions at 5-fold (20%) and 10-fold (10%) [30], and water serving as a control. Each plant received a dose of 50 mL via root irrigation. Five hours later, 500 freshly hatched M. enterolobii J2s were inoculated into a 1–2 cm deep cavity at the base of the stem for each plant. The plants were watered and fertilized as usual.
Forty-five days after transplanting, the plants were harvested by gently shaking the soil around the roots to obtain intact plant roots, followed by rinsing with water to remove any remaining soil from the root surface. The root fresh weight, shoot fresh weight and number of nematode galls and egg masses were measured.

2.6. Field Trials

Field experiments were performed over two consecutive years in a field naturally and severely infested with M. enterolobii in Wenchang City (Hainan, China) from October 2020 to March 2021 and from October 2021 to March 2022. The temperature during the experimental period ranged from 15 °C to 30 °C. The field was divided into nine blocks (8 m2 each) arranged in a randomized block design with three replications. Each block consisted of 2 rows and 10 pepper plants planted per row, with a row spacing of 50 cm and plant-to-plant spacing of 80 cm.
Four-week-old healthy pepper seedlings were transplanted to the field. Three treatments were applied: (1) water (CK), (2) Bt 00-50-5 and (3) 1.8% abamectin. The untreated control was irrigated with water. For the Bt treatment, each pepper seedling was irrigated with a mixture of 100 mL Bt fermentation broth (2 × 108 CFU/mL) and 300 mL water. The first irrigation was conducted on the day of transplanting, followed by additional irrigations 7 days and 14 days after transplanting. For the abamectin treatment, the standard solution (800× dilution) was applied for the first time along the planting line after transplanting. Abamectin was applied three times at the same intervals as Bt 00-50-5. Sixty days after transplanting, the pepper plants were uprooted and the disease index and biocontrol efficacy were calculated. During this time, the fruit was harvested four times and the yield was measured. The gall index was scored on a 1- to 5-point scale: 1 = no galls; 2 = 1–25% of roots with galls; 3 = 26–50% with galls; 4 = 51–75% with galls; and 5 = over 75% with galls [30]. The disease index was calculated according to Equation (3). Biocontrol efficacy was calculated using Equation (4). Twenty plants were harvested 60 days after transplanting, and the rate of yield increase was calculated using Equation (5).
  Disease   index = ( Number   of   diseased   plants   in   each   rating   × scale ) ( Total   number   of   plants   investigated   ×   the   highest   scale )
Biocontrol   efficacy   % = ( Disease   index   of   control - Disease   index   of   treatment ) Disease   index   of   control × 100
Yield   increase % = Average   yield   of   treated   group - Average   yield   of   control Average   yield   of   pepper   of   control     ×   100

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses and graphs were generated using OriginPro 2021 software version 9.8. The data were checked for normality and homogeneity of variance before performing the ANOVA. If the assumptions of normality and variance were not met, the data were log-transformed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, and significant differences were identified using Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test, with significant differences indicated by lowercase letters (p < 0.05). All data are presented as the mean ± standard error.

3. Results

3.1. Nematicidal Activity of Bt 00-50-5 Against M. enterolobii J2s In Vitro

The 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5 had a significant effect on the mortality of J2s, with mortality rates gradually increasing over time, reaching 82.9%, 98.0% and 100% at 12, 24 and 36 h, respectively (Figure 1A). At 24 h, the morphology of the control J2s appeared alive and curved (Figure 1C), whereas those treated with Bt 00-50-5 were stiff and dead (Figure 1B). Bt 00-50-5, thus, had strong nematicidal activity against M. enterolobii.

3.2. Inhibition of M. enterolobii Egg Hatching by Bt 00-50-5 In Vitro

After 2, 4 and 6 days, the egg hatching rates in the 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5 were 0.11%, 0.58% and 3.24%, respectively, while the control group exhibited rates of 38.5%, 63.7% and 94.5%, respectively (Figure 2A). This indicates that the CFS of Bt 00-50-5 significantly inhibits egg hatching. The morphological structures of the eggs treated with 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5 were damaged, resulting in stagnation of embryo development at the J1 stage; J1 was not observed in these eggs. In contrast, the control eggs were well developed after 2 days, the embryo inside the egg was fully formed, and after 4 days, the embryo had progressed to the first-stage juvenile, with its outline still clearly visible at this time (Figure 2B,C). The hatching of M. enterolobii eggs was significantly suppressed by Bt 00-50-5.

3.3. The Biocontrol Efficacy of Bt 00-50-5 Against M. enterolobii in the Greenhouse

Plants treated with different dilutions of Bt 00-50-5 fermentation broth showed better growth compared to the control. The fresh shoot weight of plants treated with 100% Bt 00-50-5 fermentation broth increased by 25% compared to the control, but the positive effect gradually decreased with increasing dilution of the fermentation broth (Figure 3A). The root weight of plants treated with different concentrations of Bt 00-50-5 was also higher than that of the control, and 100% Bt 00-50-5 increased the fresh root weight by 18%, although this increase was not statistically significant compared to the control (Figure 3B). The number of root galls in plants treated with different dilutions of Bt 00-50-5 was lower than in the control (Figure 3E–H), with reductions of 64%, 41% and 37%, respectively (Figure 3C). Similarly, the 100% Bt 00-50-5 treatment resulted in a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in egg masses compared to the control, with the reductions in the three dilutions (100%, 20% and 10%) being 70%, 37% and 14%, respectively (Figure 3D).

3.4. The Biocontrol Efficacy of Bt 00-50-5 Against M. enterolobii in the Field

Sixty days after transplanting, the disease index of peppers treated with Bt 00-50-5 was 31.0% and 30.5% in the 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 seasons, respectively, which was significantly different from the untreated control (Table 1). The biocontrol efficacy of Bt 00-50-5 was also higher than that of abamectin, with efficacies of 66.1% and 68.2% versus 59.5% and 63.6% in the two growing seasons, respectively (Table 1). Bt 00-50-5 improved pepper yield compared to the untreated control, with increases of 96.2% and 93.1% in the 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 seasons, respectively (Table 1), compared to 77.2% and 69.4% for abamectin. The difference in yield between Bt 00-50-5 and abamectin was significant (Table 1). The Bt 00-50-5 strain showed high nematode control efficacy, thus reducing pepper yield losses in the field.

4. Discussion

The use of antagonistic microorganisms to control pests is receiving increasing attention, and some bacterial Bacillus spp. have been used as biocontrol agents to control plant-parasitic nematodes [31,32]. In this study, the bacterium B. thuringiensis strain 00-50-5 exhibited a direct effect on M. enterolobii J2, resulting in high mortality rates and the suppression of egg hatching upon treatment with the bacterial fermentation supernatant. In addition, the Bt 00-50-5 strain significantly reduced nematode galls and egg masses and promoted pepper plant growth in the pot trials, and increased pepper yield in the field. Therefore, the Bt 00-50-5 strain showed great potential for controlling M. enterolobii in pepper production.
The CFS of the Bt 00-50-5 strain showed high nematicidal activity against M. enterolobii in vitro. A 100% concentration of CFS of Bt 00-50-5 over 24 h can result in 98% mortality of J2s. To date, several nematicidal mechanisms of Bt have been reported to contribute to biological control, including the RNA polymerase inhibition-like mechanism of thuringiensin, the degradation mechanism of proteases and/or chitinases, and the perforation mechanism of crystal protein [33]. More recently, a study reported that the protease enzyme secreted by Bt strain B79 resulted in mortality against M. enterolobii, and SEM showed that dead J2s treated with this strain were shrunken and wrinkled, with cuticle abnormalities [34]. Similarly, previously published studies have shown that protease secreted by B. cereus and B. firmus causes severe damage to the nematode cuticle and intestinal tissue of M. incognita [35,36]. However, further research is needed to identify and characterize the nematicidal compounds of Bt 00-50-5.
Bt 00-50-5 fermentation broth also showed good control of M. enterolobii both in the greenhouse and in the field, showing potential for use in practical production. In the pot experiments, different dilutions of Bt 00-50-5 significantly reduced nematode-induced root damage compared to the controls. In addition, 100% Bt 00-50-5 fermentation broth also increased the fresh root and shoot weight of pepper compared to the untreated control. Many studies have reported the growth-promoting properties of Bacillus spp. on plants, and the properties of plant growth-promoting bacteria are correlated with the genus of bacteria rather than the host plant species or plant part [37]. In natural field experiments, Bt 00-50-5 was even more effective than the chemical nematicide abamectin. It has been reported that abamectin is unstable in response to light and may be degraded by soil microorganisms, resulting in a low residues in soil or on crops, which may limit its efficacy against RKN in the field [38].
The main challenges for microbial nematicides in field applications are durability and efficacy against nematodes. Unlike chemical nematicides, which typically require only one application during one growing season, microbial nematicides usually require multiple applications to achieve the desired control efficacy. For example, Bt treatment applied twice per season reduced nematode density under field conditions in a citrus nematode-infested private orchard in Nubaria [31]. Three applications of 50 mL of Bt KYC culture broth to tomato plants at 1, 2 and 3 weeks after transplanting can significantly reduce the number of egg masses [32]. In this study, Bt 00-50-0 was applied three times by root irrigation at the early seedling stage of pepper and showed good control of M. enterolobii in the field. Undoubtedly, the application timing and concentration of Bt 00-50-0 could be optimized to further improve its control efficacy. Multi-location field trials are also needed to validate the efficacy of Bt 00-50-0 before it can be recommended for commercial application.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, we comprehensively evaluated the efficacy of Bt 00-50-5 against M. enterolobii. The results confirmed that the fermentation of Bt 00-50-5 resulted in high mortality of J2s of M. enterolobii, and strongly inhibited egg hatching. This strain also gave satisfactory results under both greenhouse and field conditions. Bt 00-50-5 as a nematicidal strain effectively controlled M. enterolobii and improved pepper yield, making it a promising alternative bionematocide.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L.; Data Curation, Y.S. and Y.P.; Investigation, Y.S. and T.F.; Methodology, Y.S.; Project Administration, Y.S. and H.L.; Software, Y.S. and Y.C.; Supervision, H.L.; Validation, Y.S. and Y.G.; Writing—Original Draft, Y.S. and H.L.; Writing—Review and Editing, H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No.321QN292), Hainan Province Science and Technology Special Fund (No. ZDYF2023XDNY076) and Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund for Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (No. 1630042022008).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hunt, D.J.; Handoo, Z.A. Taxonomy, identification and principal species. In Root-Knot Nematodes; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2009; pp. 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Forghani, F.; Hajihassani, A. Recent advances in the development of environmentally benign treatments to control root-knot nematode. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Koutsovoulos, G.D.; Poullet, M.; Elashry, A.; Kozlowski, D.K.; Sallet, E.; Da Rocha, M. Genome assembly and annotation of Meloidogyne enterolobii, an emerging arthenogenetic root-knot nematode. Sci. Data 2020, 7, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yang, B.; Eisenback, J.D. Meloidogyne enterolobii n. sp. (Meloidogynidae), a root-knot nematode parasitizing pacara earpod tree in China. J. Nematol. 1983, 15, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Collett, R.L.; Marais, M.; Daneel, M.; Rashidifard, M.; Fourie, H. Meloidogyne enterolobii, a threat to crop production with particular reference to sub-saharan Africa: An extensive, critical and updated review. Nematology 2021, 23, 247–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Long, H.B.; Sun, Y.F.; Chen, Y.; Pei, Y.L.; Feng, T.Z.; Che, H.Y. Occurrence of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) on peppers in Hainan, China, and resistance of common cultivars to M. enterolobii and M. incognita. Plant Dis. 2023, 107, 3148–3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khan, A.; Khan, A.; Ali, A.; Fatima, S.; Siddiqui, M.A. Root-Knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.): Biology, plant-nematode interactions and their environmentally benign management strategies. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2023, 75, 2187–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gao, H.J.; Qi, G.F.; Yin, R.Y.; Zhang, H.C.; Li, C.G.; Zhao, X.Y. Bacillus cereus strain S2 shows high nematicidal activity against Meloidogyne incognita by producing sphingosine. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Khan, M.R.; Mohiddin, F.A. Biocontrol strategies for nematode management, an overview. In Novel Biological and Biotechnological Applications in Plant Nematode Management; Khan, M.R., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ahmad, G.; Khan, A.; Khan, A.A. Biological control: A novel strategy for the control of the plant parasitic nematodes. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2021, 114, 885–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Antil, S.; Kumar, R.; Pathak, D.V.; Kumari, A. Recent advances in utilizing bacteria as biocontrol agents against plant parasitic nematodes emphasizing Meloidogyne spp. Biol. Control 2023, 183, 105244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Azlay, L.; El Boukhari, M.E.M.; Mayad, E.H.; Barakate, M. Biological management of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.): A review. Org. Agric. 2022, 13, 99–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Borrajo, M.P.; Mondino, E.A.; Maroniche, G.A. Potential of rhizobacteria native to Argentina for the control of Meloidogyne javanica. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2021, 54, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bel, Y.; Ferre, J.; Martinez, P.H. Bacillus thuringiensis toxins: Functional characterization and mechanism of action. Toxins 2020, 12, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, X.Q.; Wei, J.Z.; Tan, A.; Aroian, R.V. Resistance to root-knot nematode in tomato roots expressing a nematicidal Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2007, 5, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Prasad, S.S.V.; Tilak, K.V.B.R.; Gollakota, K.G. Role of Bacillus thuringiensis var. thuringiensis on the larval survivability and egg hatching of Meloidogyne spp.; the causative agent of root-knot disease. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1972, 20, 377–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wei, J.; Lum, A.; Schepers, E.; Liu, L.; Weston, R.T. Novel insecticidal proteins from ferns resemble insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2306177120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ruan, L.; Crickmore, N.; Peng, D.; Sun, M. Are nematodes a missing link in the confounded ecology of the entomopathogen Bacillus thuringiensis? Trends Microbiol. 2015, 23, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Luo, X.; Chen, L.; Huang, Q.; Zheng, J.; Zhou, W.; Peng, D.; Ruan, L.; Sun, M. Bacillus thuringiensis metalloproteinase Bmp1 functions as a nematicidal virulence factor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 460–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, X.; Zhang, R.; Ding, M.; Liu, Y.; Li, L. Biocontrol of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita by a nematicidal bacterium Paeudomonas simiae MB751 with cyclic dipeptide. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 4365–4374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jamal, Q.; Cho, J.Y.; Moon, J.H.; Munir, S.; Anees, M.; Kim, K.Y. Identification for the first time of Cyclo(D-Pro-L-Leu) produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Y1 as a nematicide for control of Meloidogyne incognita. Molecules 2017, 22, 1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mohammed, S.H.; Saedy, M.A.; Enan, M.R.; Ibrahim, N.E. Biocontrol efficiency of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2008, 7, 57–66. [Google Scholar]
  23. Du, C.; Cao, S.; Shi, X.; Nie, X.; Zheng, J.; Deng, Y.; Ruan, L.; Peng, D.; Sun, M. Genetic and biochemical characterization of a gene operon for trans-Aconitic acid, a novel nematicide from Bacillus thuringiensis. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 3517–3530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bai, C.; Barker, J.F.; Yi, S. A new Bacillus thuringiensis isolate with an unusually high activity against the banded sunflower moth. In Proceedings of the 23rd Sunflower Research Workshop, Fargo, ND, USA, 17–18 January 2001; National Sunflower Association: Bismark, ND, USA, 2001; pp. 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bai, C.; Brady, A.V. Fermentation of a new Bacillus thuringiensis strain. Helia 2001, 24, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hussey, R.S.; Barker, K.R. A comparison of methods of collecting inocula on Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Dis. Rep. 1973, 57, 1025–1028. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cayrol, J.C.; Djian, C.; Pijarowski, L. Study of the nematicidal properties of the culture filtrate of the nematophagous fungus Paecilomyces lilacinus. Rev. Nematol. 1989, 12, 331–336. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jenkins, W.R.B. A rapid centrifugal-flotation technique for separating nematodes from soil. Plant Dis. Rep. 1964, 48, 692. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wu, H.; de Oliveira Silva, J.; Becker, J.S.; Becker, J.O. Fluazaindolizine mitigates plant-parasitic nematode activity at sublethal dosages. J. Pest Sci. 2021, 94, 573–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tian, X.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, S.; Zhao, J.; Mao, Z. The biocontrol functions of Bacillus velezensis strain Bv-25 against Meloidogyne incognita. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 843041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Saedy, M.E.; Hammad, S.E.; Allah, S.F.A. Nematicidal effect of abamectin, boron, chitosan, hydrogen peroxide and Bacillus thuringiensis against citrus nematode on Valencia orange trees. J. Plant Sci. Phytopathol. 2019, 3, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Choi, T.G.; Maung, C.E.H.; Lee, D.R.; Henry, A.B.; Lee, Y.S.; Kim, K.Y. Role of bacterial antagonists of fungal pathogens, Bacillus thuringiensis KYC and Bacillus velezensis CE 100 in control of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita and subsequent growth promotion of tomato. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2020, 30, 685–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zheng, Z.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, Z.; Peng, D.; Sun, M. Nematicidal spore-forming Bacilli share similar virulence factors and mechanisms. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Puttawong, K.; Beesa, N.; Kasem, S.; Jindapunnapat, K.; Chinnasri, B.; Sasnarukkit, A. Potential of Bacillus spp. against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne enterolobii parasitizing chili (Capsicum annuum L.). Crop Prot. 2024, 184, 106780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hu, H.; Gao, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, S.; Yan, S.; Tian, X. Identification and nematicidal characterization of proteases secreted by endophytic bacteria Bacillus cereus BCM2. Phytopathology 2020, 110, 336–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Geng, C.; Nie, X.; Tang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, J.; Sun, M.; Peng, D. A novel serine protease, Sep1, from Bacillus firmus DS-1 has nematicidal activity and degrades multiple intestinal-associated nematode proteins. Sci. Rep. 2016, 27, 25012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Woźniak, M.; Gałązka, A.; Tyśkiewicz, R.; Jaroszuk-Ściseł, J. Endophytic bacteria potentially promote plant growth by synthesizing different metabolites and their phenotypic/physiological profiles in the Biolog GEN III MicroPlateTM Test. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Khalil, M.S. Abamectin and azadirachtin as eco-friendly and promising biorational tools in integrated nematodes management programs. J. Plant Pathol. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5 on J2 mortality in vitro. (A) Mortality rates of J2s treated with 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5 at different times; (B) morphology of J2 treated with NB medium control after 24 h; (C) morphology of J2 treated with 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5 after 24 h. Scale bars indicate 200 µm.
Figure 1. Effect of 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5 on J2 mortality in vitro. (A) Mortality rates of J2s treated with 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5 at different times; (B) morphology of J2 treated with NB medium control after 24 h; (C) morphology of J2 treated with 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5 after 24 h. Scale bars indicate 200 µm.
Agriculture 14 01920 g001
Figure 2. Effect of 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5 on egg hatching in vitro. (A) Hatching rate of eggs treated with Bt 00-50-5 on different days; (B) morphology of eggs treated with 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5 and NB medium control after 2 days; (C) morphology of eggs treated with 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5 and NB medium control after 2 days. Scale bars indicate 10 µm.
Figure 2. Effect of 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5 on egg hatching in vitro. (A) Hatching rate of eggs treated with Bt 00-50-5 on different days; (B) morphology of eggs treated with 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5 and NB medium control after 2 days; (C) morphology of eggs treated with 100% CFS of Bt 00-50-5 and NB medium control after 2 days. Scale bars indicate 10 µm.
Agriculture 14 01920 g002
Figure 3. Biocontrol of Bt 00-50-5 against M. enterolobii in greenhouse. (AD) Effects of different concentrations of Bt 00-50-5 fermentation on shoot weight, root weight, gall number and egg mass number. Statistical comparisons between treatments were performed using Fisher’s LSD test at p < 0.05. Means with same letter are not significantly different. (EH) Root symptoms treated with water, 100% Bt 00-50-5, 20% Bt 00-50-5 and 10% Bt 00-50-5 after 45 days.
Figure 3. Biocontrol of Bt 00-50-5 against M. enterolobii in greenhouse. (AD) Effects of different concentrations of Bt 00-50-5 fermentation on shoot weight, root weight, gall number and egg mass number. Statistical comparisons between treatments were performed using Fisher’s LSD test at p < 0.05. Means with same letter are not significantly different. (EH) Root symptoms treated with water, 100% Bt 00-50-5, 20% Bt 00-50-5 and 10% Bt 00-50-5 after 45 days.
Agriculture 14 01920 g003
Table 1. Biocontrol efficacy of Bt 00-50-5 against M. enterolobii in the field.
Table 1. Biocontrol efficacy of Bt 00-50-5 against M. enterolobii in the field.
YearTreatmentDisease Index *Control
Efficiency (%)
Yield
(kg/ha) *
Increase in
Production Rate (%)
2020–2021Untreated92.0 ± 4.6 a-4595.2 ± 122.8 c-
Bt 00-50-531.0 ± 0.6 b66.1 9017.2 ± 312.5 a96.2
Abamaectin37.1 ± 2.1 b59.5 8140.9 ± 61.3 b77.2
2021–2022Untreated96.0 ± 2.3 a-4698.8 ± 172.5 c-
Bt 00-50-530.5 ± 0.5 b68.2 9074.2 ± 234.6 a93.1
Abamaectin35.5 ± 3.9 b63.6 7961.0 ± 249.4 b69.4
* Significant differences are indicated by lowercase letters (p < 0.05) according to Fisher’s LSD test. All data are presented as mean ± standard error.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, Y.; Guo, Y.; Pei, Y.; Chen, Y.; Feng, T.; Long, H. Biocontrol Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis Strain 00-50-5 Against the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii in Pepper. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1920. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111920

AMA Style

Sun Y, Guo Y, Pei Y, Chen Y, Feng T, Long H. Biocontrol Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis Strain 00-50-5 Against the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii in Pepper. Agriculture. 2024; 14(11):1920. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111920

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Yanfang, Yuan Guo, Yueling Pei, Yuan Chen, Tuizi Feng, and Haibo Long. 2024. "Biocontrol Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis Strain 00-50-5 Against the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii in Pepper" Agriculture 14, no. 11: 1920. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111920

APA Style

Sun, Y., Guo, Y., Pei, Y., Chen, Y., Feng, T., & Long, H. (2024). Biocontrol Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis Strain 00-50-5 Against the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii in Pepper. Agriculture, 14(11), 1920. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111920

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop