Development of a Decision Support System for Animal Health Management Using Geo-Information Technology: A Novel Approach to Precision Livestock Management
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Enhanced modeling and evaluation of methodologies to optimize the growth potential of suitable tannin-rich, anti-parasitic forage legumes tailored to distinct regions within southern Africa. This will include assessment of various environmental factors and agronomic practices for maximizing forage production and efficacy.
- Employment of RFID Transponder supported telemetry technology to closely monitor animal activity (movement) patterns for detection and prediction not only of disease outbreaks, but also of individual animals unable to cope with common scourges, such as nematodosis disease outbreaks, in a timely manner. This information is then to be integrated with a smartphone application and a centralized software-based model to provide real-time preliminary treatment support and automated data evaluation [37,38,39].
- Fostering the education and training of recipient farmers through the aDSS, concentrating on subjects such as sustainable worm management practices. By leveraging the power of mobile technology, this research aims to empower farmers with the knowledge and tools necessary to improve their livestock’s health and productivity, with ultimate economic benefit to their communities.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. SSFMDSS for Efficient Production—Eswatini, as Example
2.2. Animal Remote Monitoring—Necessity and Process
- The nose for exudates
- The submandibular region for edema (bottle jaw)
- The conjunctivae of the eyelids for anemia
- The lumbar region for body condition score
- The perineum for dag (diarrhea) score
- (i)
- Establishment of a prototype RFID system designed for remote monitoring and communication of individual animal activity levels, thereby assessing the grazing behavior of sheep in typical small ruminant commercial and R-P enterprises.
- (ii)
- Subsequently assessing the performance of this system against various animal behaviors and disease states, with a particular focus on debilitating helminth infections.
- (iii)
- Examining data collected over several years (2013–2014) for both healthy and known sick animals to determine transponder signal range values associated with:
- Normal sleeping patterns (low signal volatility during sleep hours);
- Disease-induced sleep (prolonged sleep duration);
- Normal grazing patterns (low signal volatility during grazing hours);
- Flight response during attacks or poaching attempts (high signal volatility and increased signal strength); and developing real-time software capable of predicting an animal’s health and other statuses based on their signal range. This software is to be integrated into a smartphone app to provide instant alerts to R-P farmers’ cellphones when an animal is identified as sick or otherwise disturbed, through server-side analysis.
2.3. Prototype System Set Up
- (i)
- The combined influence of distance (between tags and reader) and tag movement (or lack thereof) on DTRs and the magnitude of transmitted values.
- (ii)
- The impact of different physical barriers within the reader’s interrogation zone on DTRs.
- (iii)
- The effect of background noise on DTRs, ascertained indirectly through a comparison of daytime and nighttime DTRs.
- (iv)
- The combined effects of the quantity and arrangement (clustered or dispersed) of tags within the reader’s interrogation zone on DTR.
2.4. RFID Transponder Data Analysis for Animal Movement-Based Decision Support
- (i)
- Between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m., animals rested in sheds, exhibiting minimal movement signal values.
- (ii)
- At 7 a.m., sheep rapidly transitioned to grazing pastures for several minutes, displaying peak movement signal values, but during daytime grazing, the animals demonstrated a moderate range of movement-based signals.
- (i)
- Resting and running, where it was hypothesized that there would be a significant increase in activity level scores when transitioning from a resting state to a running state.
- (ii)
- The onset of lameness and recovery from lameness: the hypothesis suggested that the daily mean activity level score and the activity level score count would decrease upon the start of lameness and then return to previous levels upon recovery.
- (iii)
- In relation to specific daily husbandry management routines for free-grazing sheep on a farm, the hypothesis was that as the distance between a tagged animal and the RFID reader increased, the hourly activity level scores would decrease, and vice versa. Moreover, the expectation was that hourly mean activity scores would either increase or decrease in relation to the energy requirements of the specific activity—whether grazing at pasture or yarding at night.
2.5. Software Development Based on Data Analysis
- Signals within a range of 0 to 40: the animal is resting or sleeping.
- Signals within a range of 41 to 90: the animal is engaged in normal grazing behavior.
- Signals with a range of 91 and above: the animal is running, as is to be expected during poaching incidents or predator attacks, or is being herded on the way home or to pasture. In this way, it becomes possible for farmers to keep an eye on animal management at home, for instance while away, for instance to check on speed of herding and the like.
- Sleeping hours: 7 p.m. to 7 a.m.
- Grazing hours: 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Forage Efficient Production Decision Support
3.2. Smartphone App Development for Animal Health Management DSS
4. Software and Modeling
4.1. Scripting for RFID Transponder Signal-Based AI Decision Support
4.2. Uncertainty and Limitations
5. Industrial Significance and Eventual Benefits upon Completion of aDSS
6. Conclusions and Summary Recommendations
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pretty, J.; Hine, R. Measuring Progress towards Agricultural Sustainability in Developing Regions. Report to the UK Department for International Development (DFID) Project CNTR 02 4047: An Analysis of Findings from the University of Essex SAFE 2 Project; University of Essex: Essex, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Pretty, J.N. Agricultural sustainability: Concepts, principles, and evidence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 2008, 363, 447–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godfray, C.; Beddington, J.R.; Crute, I.R.; Haddad, L.; Lawrence, D.; Muir, J.F.; Pretty, J.; Robinson, S.; Thomas, S.M.; Toulmin, C. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. J. Sci. 2010, 327, 812–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazonde, I.N. Social transformation and food security in the household: The experience of rural Botswana. In Alltagswelten Im Umbruch: Facets of a Changing Society; Lit Verlag: Hamburg, Germany, 2000; pp. 53–73. [Google Scholar]
- Myers, J.H.; Savoie, A.; Randen, E.V. Eradication and pest management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1998, 43, 471–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuivanen, K.S.; Alvarez, S.; Michalscheck, M.; Adjei-Nsiah, S.; Descheemaeker, K.; Mellon-Bedi, S.; Groot, J.C. Characterising the diversity of smallholder farming systems and their constraints and opportunities for innovation: A case study from the Northern Region, Ghana. NJAS Wagenin J. Life Sci. 2016, 78, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muriu, P. Mobile Based Expert System Model for Animal Health Monitoring: Cow’s Disease Monitoring in Kenya. Ph.D. Thesis, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Kenya, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Panda, S.S.; Terrill, T.H.; Mahapatra, A.K.; Kelly, B.; Van Wyk, J.A.; Morgan, E.R. Site-specific forage management of sericea lespedeza: Geospatial technology-based forage quality and yield enhancement model development. Agriculture 2020, 10, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panda, S.S.; Terrill, T.H.; Mahapatra, A.K.; Morgan, E.R.; Siddique, A.; Pech-Cervantes, A.A.; Van Wyk, J.A. Optimizing sericea lespedeza forage production in the southeastern US: A climate-informed geo-spatial engineering approach. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortigosa, G.R.; De Leo, G.A.; Gatto, M. VVF: Integrating modelling and GIS in a software tool for habitat suitability assessment. Environ. Model. Softw. 2000, 15, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendrickx, G.; Biesemans, J.; Deken, R.D. The use of GIS in veterinary parasitology. In GIS and Spatial Analysis in Veterinary Science; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2004; pp. 145–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ronchi, B.; Nardone, A. Contribution of organic farming to increase sustainability of Mediterranean small ruminant livestock systems. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003, 80, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabo, R.; Tarawali, S.A.; Singh, B.B.; Bationo, A.; Traore, B.; Traore, M.D.; Don-Gomma, A.; Odion, E.C.; Nokoe, S.; Harris, F.; et al. Enhancing the productivity and sustainability of integrated crop-livestock systems in the dry savannahs of West Africa. In Sustainable Agriculture Systems for the Drylands; CGSpace: Niamey, Niger, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Rivington, M.; Matthews, K.B.; Bellocchi, G.; Buchan, K.; Stöckle, C.O.; Donatelli, M. An integrated assessment approach to conduct analyses of climate change impacts on whole-farm systems. Environ. Model. Softw. 2007, 22, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bath, G.F.; Van Wyk, J.A. The Five Point Check© for targeted selective treatment of internal parasites in small ruminants. Small Rumin. Res. 2009, 86, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perry, B.D.; Randolph, T.F.; McDermott, J.J.; Sones, K.R.; Thornton, P.K. Investing in Animal Health Research to Alleviate Poverty; International Livestock Research Institute: Nairobi, Kenya, 2002; p. 140. [Google Scholar]
- Veglia, F. Anatomy and Life-History of the Haemonchus contortus (Rud.); UPSpace: West Chester, PA, USA, 1915. [Google Scholar]
- Mönnig, H.O.; Quin, J.I. Studies on the Alimentary Tract of the Merino Sheep in South Africa. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Ind. 1933, 1, 117–133. [Google Scholar]
- Van Wyk, J.A.; Malan, F.S.; Randles, J.L. How long before resistance makes it impossible to control some field strains of Haemonchus contortus in South Africa with any of the modern anthelmintics? Vet. Parasitol. 1997, 70, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaplan, R. Drug resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance: A status report. Trends Parasitol. 2004, 20, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Wyk, J.A.; Bath, G.F. The FAMACHA© system for managing haemonchosis in sheep and goats by clinically identifying individual animals for treatment. Vet. Res. 2002, 33, 509–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaik, S.A.; Terrill, T.H.; Miller, J.D.; Kouakou, B.; Kannan, G.; Kaplan, R.M.; Burke, J.M.; Mosjidis, J.A. Sericea lespedeza hay as a natural deworming agent against gastrointestinal nematode infection in goats. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 139, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debela, E.; Tolera, A.; Eik, L.O.; Salte, R. Condensed tannins from Sesbania sesban and Desmodium intortum as a means of Haemonchus contortus control in goats. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2012, 44, 1939–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terrill, T.H.; Miller, J.E.; Burke, J.M.; Mosjidis, J.A. Experiences with integrated concepts for the control of Haemonchus contortus in sheep and goats in the United States. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 186, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burke, J.M.; Miller, J.E.; Terrill, T.H.; Orlik, S.T.; Acharya, M.; Garza, J.J.; Mosjidis, J.A. Sericea lespedeza as an aid in the control of Eimeria spp. in lambs. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 193, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kommuru, D.S.; Barker, T.; Desai, S.; Burke, J.M.; Ramsay, A.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Kamisetti, N.; Terrill, T.H. Use of pelleted sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) for natural control of coccidia and gastrointestinal nematodes in weaned goats. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 204, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nieuwhof, G.J.; Bishop, S.C. Costs of the major endemic diseases of sheep in Great Britain and the potential benefits of reduction in disease impact. Anim. Sci. 2005, 81, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, F.; Bartley, D.; Bartley, Y.; Kenyon, F. Worm control in sheep in the future. Small Rumin. Res. 2009, 86, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan, E.R.; Charlier, J.; Hendrickx, G.; Biggeri, A.; Catalan, D.; Von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G.; Demeler, J.; Müller, E.; Van Dijk, J.; Kenyon, F.; et al. Global change and helminth infections in grazing ruminants in Europe: Impact, trends and sustainable solutions. Agriculture 2013, 3, 484–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babayani, N.D. Novel Approaches to an Automated Decision Support System for On-Farm Management of Internal Parasites of Small Ruminants. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Panda, S.S.; Terrill, T.H.; Van Wyk, J.A. An automated cellphone-based feedback and training system for resource-poor farmers for sustainable animal health and production management. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 4–8 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Panda, S.S.; Terrill, T.; Hundt, L.; Brady, L.; Novobiliski, A.; Van Wyk, J.A. Sustainable animal health management with real-time remote activity monitoring system development. Presented at the Annual International American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) Conference 2018, Detroit, MI, USA, 29 July–1 August 2018; p. 1801233. [Google Scholar]
- Charlier, J.; Morgan, E.R.; Rinaldi, L.; Van Dijk, J.D.; Höglund, J.; Hertzberg, H.; Ranst, B.V.; Hendrickx, G.; Vercruysse, J.; Kenyon, F. Practices to optimise gastrointestinal nematode control on sheep, goat and cattle farms in Europe using targeted (selective) treatments. Vet. Rec. 2014, 175, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoveland, C.S.; Windham, W.R.; Boggs, D.L.; Durham, R.G.; Calvert, G.V.; Newsome, J.F.; Dobson, J.W., Jr.; Owsley, M. Sericea lespedeza production in Georgia. Res. Bull. Ga. Agric. Exp. Station. 1990, 393, 11. [Google Scholar]
- Mkhatshwa, P.D.; Hoveland, C.S. Sericea Lespedeza Production on Acid Soils in Swaziland. Trop. Grassl. 1991, 25, 337–341. Available online: https://www.tropicalgrasslands.info/public/journals/4/Historic/Tropical%20Grasslands%20Journal%20archive/Abstracts/Vol_25_1991/Abs_25_04_91_pp337_341.html (accessed on 20 October 2023).
- Terrill, T.H.; Mosjidis, J.A. Smart man’s lucerne and worm control. In Proceedings of the WWWW 2015 International Congress Sustainable Parasitic Control, Pretoria, South Africa, 25–26 May 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Brown-Brandl, T.M.; Adrion, F.; Maselyne, J.; Kapun, A.; Hessel, E.F.; Saeys, W.; Van Nuffel, A.; Gallmann, E. A review of passive radio frequency identification systems for animal monitoring in livestock facilities. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2019, 35, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tzanidakis, C.; Tzamaloukas, O.; Simitzis, P.; Panagakis, P. Precision livestock farming applications (PLF) for grazing animals. Agriculture 2023, 13, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, X.; Shi, G.; Cheng, L.; Gu, L.; Rao, Y.; He, Y. Chipless RFID-inspired Sensing for Smart Agriculture: A Review. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2023, 363, 114725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panda, S.S.; Amatya, D.M.; Grace, J.M.; Caldwell, P.; Marion, D.A. Extreme precipitation-based vulnerability assessment of road-crossing drainage structures in forested watersheds using an integrated environmental modeling approach. Environ. Model. Softw. 2022, 155, 105413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vatta, A.F.; Lindberg, A.L.E. Managing anthelmintic resistance in small ruminant livestock of resource-poor farmers in South Africa. JSAVA 2006, 77, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanyangu, S.W.; Bain, R.K.; Rugutt, M.K.; Nginyi, J.M.; Mugambi, J.M. Anthelmintic resistance amongst sheep and goats in Kenya. Prev. Vet. Med. 1994, 25, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabriel, S.; Phiri, I.K.; Dorny, P.; Vercruysse, J. A survey on anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of sheep in Lusaka, Zambia. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 2001, 68, 271–274. [Google Scholar]
- Berger, J. Resistance of a field strain of Haemonchus contortus to five benzimidazole anthelmintics in current use. JSAVA 1975, 46, 369–372. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Van Wyk, J.A.; Hoste, H.; Kaplan, R.M.; Besier, R.B. Targeted selective treatment for worm management—How do we sell rational programs to farmers? Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 139, 336–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Wyk, J.A.; Van Wijk, E.F.; Stenson, M.O.; Barnard, S.H. Anthelmintic resistance reversion by dilution with a susceptible strain of Haemonchus contortus in the field: Preliminary report. In Proceedings of the 5th International Sheep Veterinary Congress, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 21–25 January 2001; pp. 194–195. [Google Scholar]
- Kenyon, F.; McBean, D.; Greer, A.W.; Burgess, C.G.; Morrison, A.; Bartley, D.J.; Bartley, Y.; Devin, L.; Nath, M.; Jackson, F. A comparative study of the effects of four treatment regimes on ivermectin efficacy, body weight and pasture contamination in lambs naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes in Scotland. Int. J. Parasitol. Drug 2013, 3, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kenyon, F.; Greer, A.W.; Coles, G.C.; Cringoli, G.; Papadopoulos, E.; Cabaret, J.; Berrag, B.; Varady, M.; Van Wyk, J.; Thomas, E.; et al. The role of targeted selective treatments in the development of refugia-based approaches to the control of gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 164, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- López-Gatiusa, F.; Santolariab, P.; Mundeta, I.; Yánizb, J.L. Walking activity at estrus and subsequent fertility in dairy cows. Theriogenology 2005, 63, 1419–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helwatkar, A.; Riordan, D.; Walsh, J. Sensor technology for animal health monitoring. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Sensing Technology, Liverpool, UK, 2–4 September 2014; pp. 266–271. Available online: https://sciendo.com/article/10.21307/ijssis2019-057 (accessed on 20 January 2023).
- Anon. Radio-Frequency Identification [Internet]. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 2012. Available online: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Radio_frequency_identificationandoldid=487109935 (accessed on 20 October 2023).
- Palmer, M. Seven Principles of Effective RFID Data Management. Enterprise Systems, Progress Real Time Division. 2004. Available online: www.progress.com (accessed on 20 December 2023).
- Yang, L.; Qi, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Zhong, X. Revisiting tag collision problem in RFID systems. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP 2010), San Diego, CA, USA, 13–16 September 2010; pp. 178–187. [Google Scholar]
- Bueno-Delgado, V.M.; Vales-Alonso, J. Analysis of the identification process in active RFID systems with capture effect. In Proceedings of the European Workshop on Smart Objects: Systems, Technologies and Applications (RFID SysTech), Ciudad Real, Spain, 15–16 June 2010; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Besier, R.; Kahn, L.P.; Sargison, N.; Van Wyk, J.A. The pathophysiology, ecology and epidemiology of Haemonchus contortus infection in small ruminants. In Advances in Parasitology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2016; pp. 95–143. [Google Scholar]
- Mapiye, O.; Makombe, G.; Molotsi, A.; Dzama, K.; Mapiye, C. Information and communication technologies (ICTs): The potential for enhancing the dissemination of agricultural information and services to smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Inf. Dev. 2023, 39, 638–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etzo, S.; Collender, G. The mobile phone ‘revolution’in Africa: Rhetoric or reality? Afr. Aff. 2010, 109, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodchild, M.F. A GIScience perspective on the uncertainty of context. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 2018, 108, 1476–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodchild, M.F. How well do we really know the world? Uncertainty in GIScience. J. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2020, 2020, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wechsler, S.P.; Ban, H.; Li, L. The pervasive challenge of error and uncertainty in geospatial data. In Geospatial Challenges in the 21st Century; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 315–332. [Google Scholar]
- Panda, S.S. ArcGIS Online Dashboard–Site-Specific Forage Management of Sericea Lespedeza: Geospatial Technology-Based Forage Quality and Yield Enhancement WebGIS Decision Support System. Available online: https://esriung.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/7a15d64416ef47188c32c08317128f7 (accessed on 26 February 2021).
- UN FAO. FAO SOILS PORTAL. 2024. Available online: https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/data-hub/soil-maps-and-databases/en/ (accessed on 11 January 2024).
- Fana, E.M.; Mpoloka, S.W.; Leteane, M.; Seoke, L.; Masoba, K.; Mokopasetso, M.; Rapharing, A.; Kabelo, T.; Made, P.; Hyera, J. A five-year retrospective study of foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in Southern Africa, 2014 to 2018. Vet. Med. Int. 2021, 2021, 7438809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bruckner, G.K.; Vosloo, W.; Plessis, B.J.; Kloeck, P.E.; Connoway, L.; Ekron, M.D.; Weaver, D.B.; Dickason, C.J.; Schreuder, F.J.; Marais, T. Foot and mouth disease: The experience of South Africa. Rev. Sci. Et Technol. Off. Int. Des Épizooties 2002, 21, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Environmental Factors | Suitability Criteria | Assigned Weights |
---|---|---|
Land cover | Open land (any land cover) | 0.35 |
Slope | Greater than 45% slope | 0.25 |
Soil characteristics | non-clay soil | 0.45 |
Temperature | 20 °C to 30 °C | N/A (entire study area has suitable condition) |
Precipitation | Low precipitation (Arid and semi-arid Condition) | N/A (entire study area has suitable condition) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Panda, S.S.; Terrill, T.H.; Siddique, A.; Mahapatra, A.K.; Morgan, E.R.; Pech-Cervantes, A.A.; Van Wyk, J.A. Development of a Decision Support System for Animal Health Management Using Geo-Information Technology: A Novel Approach to Precision Livestock Management. Agriculture 2024, 14, 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14050696
Panda SS, Terrill TH, Siddique A, Mahapatra AK, Morgan ER, Pech-Cervantes AA, Van Wyk JA. Development of a Decision Support System for Animal Health Management Using Geo-Information Technology: A Novel Approach to Precision Livestock Management. Agriculture. 2024; 14(5):696. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14050696
Chicago/Turabian StylePanda, Sudhanshu S., Thomas H. Terrill, Aftab Siddique, Ajit K. Mahapatra, Eric R. Morgan, Andres A. Pech-Cervantes, and Jan A. Van Wyk. 2024. "Development of a Decision Support System for Animal Health Management Using Geo-Information Technology: A Novel Approach to Precision Livestock Management" Agriculture 14, no. 5: 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14050696
APA StylePanda, S. S., Terrill, T. H., Siddique, A., Mahapatra, A. K., Morgan, E. R., Pech-Cervantes, A. A., & Van Wyk, J. A. (2024). Development of a Decision Support System for Animal Health Management Using Geo-Information Technology: A Novel Approach to Precision Livestock Management. Agriculture, 14(5), 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14050696