Next Article in Journal
On-Site Investigations of Coastal Erosion and Accretion for the Northeast of Taiwan
Next Article in Special Issue
Revealing the Effectiveness of Fisheries Policy: A Biological Observation of Species Johnius belengerii in Xiamen Bay
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Evaluation of Shear Properties of Lightweight PVC Core for Marine Application Using Digital Image Correlation System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stock Assessment and Rebuilding of Two Major Shrimp Fisheries (Penaeus monodon and Metapenaeus monoceros) from the Industrial Fishing Zone of Bangladesh
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phylogeography and Genetic Structure of the Swimming Crabs Portunus sanguinolentus (Herbst, 1783) in East Asia

1
Institude of Fisheries Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei City 10617, Taiwan
2
Department of Leisure & Tourism Management, Shu-Te University, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan
3
Fisheries College, Jimei University, No. 185 Yinjiang Rd., Jimei District, Xiamen 361021, China
4
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Fishery Resources and Eco-Environment, Xiamen 361021, China
5
Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China
6
Department of Hospitality and Baking Management, Shu-Te University, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10(2), 281; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10020281
Submission received: 20 January 2022 / Revised: 12 February 2022 / Accepted: 15 February 2022 / Published: 18 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Fisheries Management)

Abstract

:
The three-spot swimming crab (Portunus sanguinolentus) is mainly distributed in South East Asia. An analysis of mitochondrial control region partial sequences allows us to determine the population genetic structure, phylogeography and historical demography of this species in East Asia. The seven populations, which included 110 individuals, were collected from mainland China (Shanghai, SH, Xiamen, XM and Hong Kong, HK), Taiwan (Yilan, YL, Taichung, TC, Donggang, DG) and Singapore (Singapore, SGP). The nucleotide diversity (π) of all individuals was 0.01149, with values ranging from 0.00372 (SGP) to 0.01345 (YL). In total, 90 haplotypes have been identified, which can be divided into two major lineages: lineage A consists of specimens from SH, YL, XM, TC and DG, and lineage B corresponds to specimen from SGP. From the second to the most recent interglacial period, population expansion was observed in each lineage. However, a low level of genetic differentiation was also observed in the three-spotted swimming crab, P. sanguinolentus, according to FST values. Our results suggest that several past and present habitat configurations have shaped the genetic patterns of P. sanguinolentus until now. During Pleistocene glaciations, when sea levels were low, this species may have moved along the coast from Southeast Asia to China. It first colonized the Hong Kong area during this era. After sea levels rose and shorelines receded, it subsequently spread to the coast of mainland China.

1. Introduction

Complex geological events and climatic histories in different regions can help to shape the current phylogeographic patterns of marine organisms [1,2]. Therefore, climate change, biology and geography interact to affect the current genetic composition of a specific species [3]. Paleoclimate changes have contributed to the modern biodiversity patterns of the Asian continent and nearby islands [4]. Due to the fluctuation of sea levels in East Asia during the Pleistocene glacial era, the connection between the islands of Luzon, Hainan and Taiwan to the mainland has been repeatedly changed [5,6]. The Taiwan Strait was nearly separated from the Pacific Ocean, the South China Sea was completely exposed, and the main islands of Taiwan were connected to the mainland [7]. Complex geological and climatic factors have led to ancient substitution and diffusion events, thus forming a highly diverse and unique biota [8]. These historical events seem to be the main reason for the genetic isolation, distribution and genetic structure of East Asian organisms [9].
During the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), the sea level in the East China Sea was 130–150 m lower than its level at the present, and the sea level in the South China Sea was 100–120 m lower [10,11]. Therefore, the entire Yellow Sea, Bohai gulf, Tsushima and Taiwan Strait were exposed, and Japan, South Korea and Taiwan became connected to mainland China [12]. During the post-glacial period, coastal currents traveled from mainland China to the South China Sea, and the Chinese coastal stream flowed along Fujian to Vietnam. In addition, the thermohaline circulation in Singapore waters was important. Additionally, as many rivers were separated by the sea during the glacial period, but were connected during the interglacial period, gene flow may have been an inevitable result [13]. The determination of how past and current factors have contributed to observed genetic structures allows a deeper understanding of a species’ evolutionary history and ecological adaptation, as well as the formulation of management and conservation strategies [14].
A species’ genetic diversity is often shaped by past and current patterns of habitat availability and connectivity [2,3,7]. Extant patterns of population genetic diversity may be primarily shaped by historical processes, such as glaciations, climate changes and palaeogeographic formations [15,16,17,18]. Several recent studies suggested that climate change might cause significant changes in species distributions and biological richness, and DNA technology could also be used to track the genetic impact of adaptation [2,3]. Mitochondrial (mt) DNA has many characteristics, including rapid evolution, minimal recombination and maternal inheritance, making it suitable for population genetics research [19,20].
The three-spotted swimming crabs of the species Portunus sanguinolentus, which have been documented from East Africa to Hawaii, are widely distributed throughout the Indo-Pacific region [21,22,23]. P. sanguinolentus is one of the major crab species in China’s East and South China Sea. This crab species is highly valuable in China, and its exports have increased since the 1990s. On the northern continental shelf of the South China Sea, crabs were analyzed for their composition and distribution in quantitative terms. P. sanguinolentus accounted for almost 30% of catches among all crab species [24]. After P. trituberculatus, P. sanguinolentus ranked high among the economically important crab species of the East China Sea in 1998 and 1999 [25]. However, fishing pressure has resulted in a decrease in the yield of P. sanguinolentus over the past few years [26].
Genetic diversity and its relationship to population genetic structure can be used to manage and protect a commercially important species [27,28]. Functional genetic diversity in an exploited marine species is relevant to fisheries management. Many studies on the reproductive biology [29], fisheries biology [30] and ecology [31] of P. sanguinolentus have been conducted. It is crucial to manage crab resources based on these data. By contrast, there is little information about the phylogeography and population genetic structure of P. sanguinolentus from Southeast Asia, East Asia and Northeast Asia. Using mtDNA fragments from the control region (D-loop) gene, we discovered the genetic structure of Southeast, East and Northeast Asia’s three-spotted swimmer crab populations, along with their historical demography.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

Specimens were collected in public and open waters between December 2018 and October 2019 by utilizing five decoy pitfalls in each coastal and estuarine location from 17:00 to 7:30 successively, working three days a week. Seven populations that included 110 individuals from mainland China (Shanghai, SH, Xiamen, XM and Hong Kong, HK), Taiwan (Yilan, YL, Taichung, TC, Donggang, DG) and Singapore (Singapore, SGP) were collected (Figure 1; Table 1). DNA was extracted from the specimens after freezing or icing and kept at −75 °C immediately after capture.

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR and Sequencing

Using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit, we extracted total genomic DNA from the pereopod muscle [32]. The mitochondrial DNA were amplified and sequenced. The control region fragments of mtDNA were then amplified and sequenced. The control region sequence was amplified using YEN-F (5′- GCA AAT ACA CGC AAT AAC TCT CAT AC -3′) and YEN-B (5′- TGT AAA TCC GTT ACG AAT AAT ATA GG -3′) primers. Thermal loop measurements were carried out using a Geneamp 2400 thermal loop device (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA). In the PCR reaction, a total of 39 denatured rings were run at 95 °C for 50 s, the annealing step was completed at 50 °C for 1 min, and the extension was completed at 72 °C for 1.5 min. The first and last loops included an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 95 °C and a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C, respectively. By separating PCR products on 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis, purifying them with a gene clean II kit (Bio101), and sequencing them with an ABI 377 DNA sequencer, we were able to identify mRNAs identified in the PCR products.

2.3. Analyses of Sequences

Megalign (DNASTAR, LaserGene, WI, USA) was used to align all sequences. The number, base composition, haplotype and nucleotide diversity [33] of variable and parsimony information sites were identified using calculations that were performed with DnaSP version 5.00 [34]. Some sequences of the control region genes were concatenated in the following analysis. Using MEGA 6, the neighbor-joining (NJ) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods were applied to analyze the geographic characteristics of the control area [35,36]. The phylogenetic relationships of all haplotypes were assessed using bootstrap analysis of 1000 replicates. Using the optimal substitution model determined using MEGA, networks were constructed using the median-joining method in Fluxus-Engineering networks version 4.6.1.3. In the ARLEQUIN program, the frequency distribution of pairwise differences (mismatch distribution) between sequences was examined for historical demographic expansion [7,37]. We used the formula A = μπ [38] to estimate the approximate age of the population or lineage, where A represents the age of the population or lineage, π represents the nucleotide diversity and μ is μ (mutation rate) × generation time; formula τ = 2μT [39] estimates the approximate date of population expansion, where T represents the time since the expansion, τ is the extension time, and 2μ is μ (the mutation rate) × generation time × the number of bases sequenced. The mutation rate of the nucleotide of the D-loop is 3.6% per myr, which is the average mutation rate of fish [40]. In the analysis of divergence rates, a mean mutation rate of 3.6% per myr was applied to the divergence rates of all of the D-loop sequences, and a generation time of one year was assumed [41,42]. The ARLEQUIN software version 3.5 was used to estimate pair-wise FST statistics in order to assess the genetic differentiation between two populations [43]. We assessed the structure of the population by molecular analysis of variance (AMOVA in ARLEQUIN; [44]) as well as by constructing a dendrogram for each point in our sample using an unweighted arithmetic mean based on FST values (UPGMA).
UPGMA trees for these seven populations provide information about their groupings. Hypothetical display groups with ΦC maxima that are significantly different from random tissues from similar populations are most likely to represent geographical subdivisions [45]. The permutation test was used for evaluation, and the significance test of the results, was evaluated via 10,000 random permutation tests. By testing for deviations from neutrality, Tajima’s D [46] can indicate if a population expansion had previously occurred. We also used Fu’s Fs test [47] to evaluate the evidence for population expansion by DnaSP. In order to determine whether the population is expanding, DnaSP was used; as a measure of deviation from neutrality, we used Tajima’s D test [46], which indicates whether population expansions occurred previously. Fu’s Fs test [47] was used to determine whether DnaSP evidence indicated population expansion. Additionally, using DnaSP, we examined, by way of mismatch analysis, the frequency distribution of the nucleotide differences with respect to frequency. Geographic distances were paired 1000 times to determine significance levels, and the significance level was determined using the pairwise FST value and paired geographic distance values. The Mantel test [48] was used to test distance isolation. The approximate geographical distance between sampling sites was used as the minimum distance map.

3. Results and Discussions

Biological Information and Growth Estimation

We sequenced 110 specimens and obtained the following results. For the control region of 864 bp, we found 57 variable sites and 71 parsimony informative sites, totaling 90 distinct haplotypes (S1 Dataset). GeneBank accession numbers OL692628–OL692737 contain all of the sequences deposited. Among the seven populations evaluated, the nucleotide compositions had an AT bias (with G + C content of 33.7%). The haplotypic diversity (h) of all seven populations was 0.988, with values ranging from 0.856 (XM) to 1.000 (YL, TC, HK and SGP) (Table 1).
A nucleotide diversity of 0.011 was found across all populations (π), with values ranging from 0.004 (XM) to 0.013 (SGP) (Table 1). A total of 90 haplotypes was detected in 110 samples. The most common genotype was shared by 11 individuals across 3 populations, including XM (7), SH (3) and SGP (3).
We used the T92 model to explain the best-fitting modes of our data. The model was used for both NJ and ML rebuilding as well as for the AMOVA study. Both NJ and ML trees had very similar results (Figure 2). Two distinct lineages were identified (A and B). Based on the NJ and ML trees, the bootstrap values were 99 and 100, respectively, for lineages A and B. The network of all specimens (Figure 3) confirms the findings of these phylogenetic trees. In lineage A, two sub-lineages were found. Figure 1 and Table 1 show the distribution of specimens of lineages A and B for different populations. Lineage A included all the individuals from SH, YL, TC, XM, DG and HK, and all the individuals from SGP were only involved in lineage B.
Accordingly, lineages A and B had haplotype diversities (h) of 0.987 and 1.000, respectively, and the nucleotide diversity (π) of each was respectively 0.008 and 0.013 (Table 1). The τ values of lineages A and B were 4.035/2 and 8.136/2 generations, respectively (Table 1). The τ values of lineages A and B were 4.035/2µ and 8.136/2µ generations, respectively, using an average mutation rate of 3.6%/myr and a generation time of 1 year. For lineage A, the time of expansion was approximately 160,022 years ago, and for lineage B, it was approximately 322,744 years ago. The FST values within the seven populations were all significant (Table 2). In terms of the UPGMA tree of these seven sampling areas, two major groups were identified (Figure 4); the first group includes XM, TC, SH, DG, HK and YL, and the second group includes SG.
It is possible to further divide the first group into two subgroups. One of the subgroups of the first group included the XM, TC, SH and DG populations; the second subgroup included the HK and YL populations. According to the UPGMA trees, five different groupings could be detected among the seven populations listed in Table 3. Based on the AMOVA analysis, the FST for seven pair-wise population was 0.4259, indicating significant heterogeneity in at least one case. Significant values of ΦCT were observed in all groupings.
Based on the AMOVA analysis, the FST for each pair-wise population was 0.4259, indicating that there was significant heterogeneity in at least one paired population. All ΦCT values were observed to reach significance. According to the study, grouping 2 had the highest ΦCT (0.7519), and two groups could properly be divided into the following populations: the first group included SH, YL, TC, XM, DG and HK, whereas the second group included the SGP one. There were also significant ΦCT values among different groups, indicating that it may also have happened among populations that there was an additional genetic discontinuity. Table 1 shows that values of Tajima’s D were non-significant, except for SH (Table 1). Tajima’s D values were significant across each lineage and across the entire sample. Fu’s Fs tests were significant for the SH, TC, DG, HK and YL populations. The bimodal distribution of mismatched specimens was obtained for all specimens (Figure 5), with one mode representing differences between lineages and another mode representing differences within lineages. For lineage A or B, a unimodal distribution was obtained.

4. Discussions

The present study found two distinct lineages of P. sanguinolentus in East Asia (A and B), which agrees with the previous study [49]. Despite the fact that all seven populations did include individuals from lineages A and B, two distinct lineages (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3) were detected. The SH, YL, TC, XM, DG and HK populations were only found to belong to lineage A, and the SGP population was only represented by individuals from lineage B.
All the populations of lineage A (the XM, SH and TC populations) shared the same most common allele, indicating that they were ancestrally related. There is evidence that populations containing ancestral genotypes tend to retain a higher level of haplotype and nucleotide diversity over time [50,51,52]. Compared to lineage A (π = 0.008), nucleotide diversity (π = 0.013; h = 1.000) in lineage B was significantly higher than haplotype diversity (h = 0.987). This indicates that lineage B is older than lineage A. Estimates are 160,022 and 322,744 years for the extension of lineages A and B, respectively.
The matching distribution of two different lineages indicates that a smaller population existed before the bottleneck or expansion of lineage A (Figure 5) [39]. According to this image, lineage A may have undergone expansion more recently than lineage B. This is also corroborated by the fact that the pairwise distribution pattern shifts toward being displaced to the right in Figure 5. Based on these findings, lineage A expanded for a longer period than lineage B. In other words, lineage B only experienced gene flow exchanges but did not experience population expansion. Since there are few samples, it is likely that there are multiple peaks in pair-wise differences and the expected distribution of mismatches for lineage B.
The currents in the planktonic larval stage of P. sanguinolentus in the study area include the offshore warm current of China and the South China Sea warm current. Therefore, offshore plankton larvae may be transported along the ocean currents, which bring low salinity to the south along the coast of China [53,54]. Genetic exchange in the marine environment may be due to the high transmission capacity of P. sanguinolentus larvae and the lack of physical barriers. The lack of genetic structure in marine ecosystems is usually due to limitations of physical barriers, larvae dispersal abilities and their ability to swim long distances [55]. Similar results have often appeared in previous studies; for example, the red crab Charybdis feriata found on the coast of the China Sea also demonstrated the phenomenon of low genetic differentiation [56]. The evolutionary age of lineage B is much older than lineage A (approximately 160,022 and 322,744 years ago, respectively), because during the Last Glacial Maxima, the continents of China and SE Asia were an exposed landmass [57]. After sea levels rose, these coastlines were immersed by the sea again, and lineage A developed in Northeast Asia and Southeast Asia. Probably after lineage A developed, it dispersed via the South China Sea warm currents and China coastal current to HK, XM, DG, TC and SH waters. Therefore, the oldest and youngest populations were those from SPG and XM, respectively.
Furthermore, the distribution limit of lineage B probably could not extend to the Indian Ocean through the Malacca Strait. During the glacial maxima, the sunda shelf was blocked [58]. After the sea level rose, lineage B could invade the new coastlines but their larvae could not travel through the Malacca Strait to the Indian Ocean. A similar pattern was also revealed for the tiger prawn, where there was a sharp genetic break at the west coast of the Malacca Strait [58]. Then, lineage B was probably only distributed in the South China Sea, and did not extend to the West Pacific (lineage A). Marine species were restricted into relatively confined areas as a result of habitat destruction, which resulted in the mixing of populations and reduced genetic variation [59]. After LGM, the distribution of three-spot swimming crabs gradually extended, corresponding to the rise of the sea level of the East China Sea. The swimming crab migrates from the inshore to the offshore as it reaches a certain size or life stage, but the distance is limited [60]. In this species, therefore, gene flow occurs primarily through larval dispersal. Ocean currents play a key role in dispersal. The life span of P. sanguinolentus is about 1–2 years. It usually inhabits sandy marine habitats at depths of 10–80 m [61,62,63]. The larvae drift with the ocean current. After 15–18 days, the hatched zoeae transform into giant crabs called juvenile crabs, which gradually transition to living on the bottom of the sea [29]. Therefore, the planktonic larval stage of crabs may have an impact on determining the genetic structure. Coastal currents shifted from mainland China to the South China Sea during the post-glacial period. The Chinese coastal stream flows along Fujian to Vietnam. The role of thermohaline circulation in the waters of Singapore is an important function. However, the interaction between the DG sample in Taiwan and the coastal current in China was not obvious in lineage A, resulting in the formation of the isolated group of lineage B.
Based on the above discussions, the expansion path of lineage A was carried by the Kuroshio Current from the southern end to Taiwan and then divided into three tributaries: one flowed through the east of Taiwan, one flowed to the west, forming the HK and YL populations that are relatively similar, and the last one flowed up the Taiwan Strait and the coastal waters of China to SH. For Lineage B, this means that SGP did not expand, but only formed a gene flow interaction. However, other marine organisms demonstrated similar patterns with two main lineages. As examples, barnacles [64,65] and intertidal crabs [66] have different lineages in the East, Northeast and Southeast Asia Sea and their populations in East and Northeast Asia are much younger. It is phylogeography important for the management and conservation of the commercial species of P. sanguinolentus along Asian coasts to determine where it originated from and its genetic structure.

5. Conclusions

Based on our study, we found two major lineages (A and B) among the three spot crab populations in East Asia. Lineage B is generally older than lineage A. The A and B lineages of the three-spotted swimming crab P. sanguinolentus underwent population expansion approximately during the Pleistocene glacial period (approximately 160,022 and 322,744 years ago, respectively). The genetic structure of P. sanguinolentus in East Asia may have been affected during the Pleistocene Glacial Maxima and due to ocean currents that blocked larval dispersal pathways, resulting in the evolution of lineage B into a single population, with marine species confined to relatively narrow areas, resulting in mixed populations with reduced genetic variation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-M.L., C.-H.S., P.-C.C. and T.-D.T.; methodology, Y.-M.L., C.-H.S., P.-C.C. and T.-D.T.; software, Y.-M.L., C.-H.S. and P.-C.C.; validation, Y.-M.L., C.-H.S., P.-C.C., W.-C.K., Y.-C.L. and T.-D.T.; formal analysis, Y.-M.L., C.-H.S., P.-C.C., W.-C.K., Y.-C.L. and T.-D.T.; investigation, Y.-M.L., C.-H.S., P.-C.C., W.-C.K., Y.-C.L. and T.-D.T.; resources, Y.-M.L., C.-H.S. and P.-C.C.; data curation, Y.-M.L., C.-H.S. and P.-C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-M.L., C.-H.S. and P.-C.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.-M.L., C.-H.S., Y.-S.H. and P.-C.C.; visualization, Y.-M.L., C.-H.S. and P.-C.C.; supervision, Y.-M.L., C.-H.S., P.-C.C. and T.-D.T.; project administration, Y.-M.L., C.-H.S., P.-C.C. and T.-D.T.; funding acquisition, Y.-M.L., C.-H.S., P.-C.C. and T.-D.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, grant number MOST 110-2121-M-366-001. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Global Institute for Green Tourism, University of California, Berkeley, for supporting the cruises of the biological survey. We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers, whose useful suggestions were incorporated into the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hewitt, G.M. Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1996, 58, 247–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Avise, J.C. Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species, 3rd ed.; Harvard Publishers Inc.: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hewitt, G.M. The genetic legacy of the quaternary ice ages. Nature 2000, 405, 907–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gallagher, S.J.; Kitamura, A.; Iryu, Y.; Itaki, T.; Koizumi, I.; Hoiles, P.W. The Pliocene to recent history of the Kuroshio and Tsushima Currents: A multi-proxy approach. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 2015, 2, 2–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hansen, J.E.; Sato, M. 2012 Paleoclimate Implications for human-made climate change. In Climate Change: Inferences from Paleoclimate and Regional Aspects; Berger, A., Mesinger, F., Sijacki, D., Eds.; Springer Publishers Inc.: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang, L.; Sarnthein, M.; Erlenkeuser, H.; Grimalt, J.; Grootes, P.; Heilig, S.; Ivanova, E.; Kienast, M.; Pelejero, C.; Pflaumann, U. East Asian monsoon climate during the late Pleistocene: High-resolution sediment records from the South China Sea. Mar. Geol. 1999, 156, 245–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chen, P.C.; Shih, C.H.; Chu, T.J.; Wang, D.; Lee, Y.C.; Tzeng, T.D. Population Structure and Historical Demography of the Oriental River Prawn (Macrobrachium nipponense) in Taiwan. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Jiang, L.; Qiao, G. Islands conserve high species richness and areas of endemism of Hormaphidinae aphids. Curr. Zool. 2017, 63, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Shen, K.N.; Jamandre, B.W.; Hsu, C.C.; Tzeng, W.N.; Durand, J.D. Plio-Pleistocene sea level and temperature fuctuations in the northwestern Pacifc promoted speciation in the globally-distributed fathead mullet Mugil cephalus. BMC Evol. Biol. 2011, 11, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Xiao, S.; Li, A.; Jiang, F.; Li, T.; Wan, S.; Huang, P. The history of the Yangtze river entering sea since the last glacial maximum: A review and lock forward. J. Coast. Res. 2004, 20, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, M.Y.; Cai, Y.; Tzeng, C.S. Molecular systematics of the freshwater prawn genus Macrobrachium Bate, 1868 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Palaemonidae) inferred from mtDNA sequences, with emphasis on east Asian species. Zool. Stud. 2007, 46, 272–289. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, P.; Sun, X. Last glacial maximum in China: Comparison between land and sea. Catena 1994, 23, 341–353. [Google Scholar]
  13. Craw, D.; Burridge, C.; Anderson, L.; Waters, J.M. Late Quaternary river drainage and fish evolution, Southland, New Zealand. Geomorphology 2007, 84, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McCartney-Melstad, E.; Shaffer, B.H. Amphibian molecular ecology and how it has informed conservation. Mol. Ecol. 2015, 24, 5084–5109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Strugnell, J.M.; Watts, P.C.; Smith, P.J.; Allcock, A.L. Persistent genetic signatures of historic climatic events in an Antarctic octopus. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21, 2775–2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pinceel, T.; Vanschoenwinkel, B.; Waterkeyn, A.; Vanhove, M.P.M.; Pinder, A.M.; Timms, B.V. Fairy shrimps in distress: A molecular taxonomic review of the diverse fairy shrimp genus Branchinella (Anostraca: Thamnocephalidae) in Australia in the light of ongoing environmental change. Hydrobiologia. 2013, 700, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pineros, V.J.; Gutierrez-Rodriguez, C. Population genetic structure and connectivity in the widespread coral-reef fish Abudefduf saxatilis: The role of historic and contemporary factors. Coral Reefs 2017, 36, 877–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nali, R.C.; Becker, C.G.; Zamudio, K.R.; Prado, C.P.A. Topography, more than land cover, explains genetic diversity in a Neotropical savanna tree frog. Divers. Distrib. 2020, 26, 1798–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hoelzel, A.R.; Hancock, J.M.; Dover, G.A. Evolution of the cetacean mitochondrial D-loop region. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1991, 8, 475–493. [Google Scholar]
  20. Xu, J.; Chan, T.Y.; Tsang, L.M.; Chu, K.H. Phylogeography of the mitten crab Eriocheir sensu stricto in East Asia: Pleistocene isolation, population expansion and secondary contact. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 52, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Apel, M.; Spiridonov, V.A. Taxonomy and zoogeography of the portunid crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Portunidae) of the Arabian Gulf and the adjacent waters. Fauna Arabia. 1998, 17, 159–331. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lai, J.C.Y.; Ng, P.K.L.; Davie, P.J.F. A revision of the Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) species complex (Crustacea: Brachyura: Portunidae), with the recognition of four species. Raffles Bull. Zool. 2010, 58, 199–237. [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang, Y.H.; Shih, H.T. Diversity in the Taiwanese swimming crabs (Crustacea: Brachyura: Portunidae) estimated through DNA barcodes, with descriptions of 14 new records. Zool. Stud. 2021, 60, 60. [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang, Z.R. Species composition and quantitative distribution of crabs in the northern continental shelf of South China Sea. J. Dalian Fish Univ. 2009, 24, 553–558. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yu, C.G.; Song, H.T.; Yao, G.Z.; Lü, H.Q. Composition and distribution of economic crab species in the East China Sea. Oceanol. Limnol. Sin. 2006, 37, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yang, C.P.; Li, H.X.; Li, L.; Xu, J.; Yan, Y. Population structure, morphometric analysis and reproductive biology of Portunus sanguinolentus (Herbst, 1783) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Portunidae) in Honghai Bay, South China Sea. J. Crustacean Biol. 2014, 34, 722–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ward, R.D. Genetics in fisheries management. Hydrobiologia 2000, 420, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ortega-Villaizan Romo, M.; Suzuki, S.; Nakajima, M.; Taniguchi, N. Genetic evolution of inter individual relatedness for broodstock management of the rare species barfin flounder Verasper moseri using microsatellite DNA markers. Fish. Sci. 2006, 72, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rasheed, S.; Mustaquim, J. Size at sexual maturity, breeding season and fecundity of three-spot swimming crab Portunus sanguinolentus (Herbst, 1783) (Decapoda, Brachyura, Portunidae) occurring in the coastal waters of Karachi, Pakistan. Fish Res. 2010, 103, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, H.H.; Hsu, C.C. Population biology of the swimming crab Portunus sanguinolentus in the waters off northern Taiwan. J. Crustacena Biol. 2003, 23, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Song, H.T.; Yu, C.G.; Xue, L.J.; Yao, G.Z. The Economical Shrimp and Crab from East China Sea; Ocean Press: Beijing, China, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sambrook, J.; Russell, D.W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Publishers Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  33. Nei, M. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, 1st ed.; Columbia Publishers Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rozas, J.; Sanchez-Delbarrio, J.C.; Messeguer, X.; Rozas, R. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 2496–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bandelt, H.J.; Forster, P.; Rohl, A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chen, P.C.; Shih, C.H.; Chu, T.J.; Lee, Y.C.; Tzeng, T.D. Phylogeography and genetic structure of the oriental river prawn Macrobrachium nipponense (Crustacea: Decapoda: Palaemonidae) in East Asia. PLoS ONE 2017, 2, e0173490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Nei, M.; Tajima, F. DNA polymorphism detectable by restriction endonucleases. Genetics 1981, 97, 145–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Rogers, A.R.; Harpending, H. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1992, 9, 552–569. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Aboim, M.A.; Menezes, G.M.; Schlitt, T.; Rogers, A.D. Genetic structure and history of populations of the deep-sea fish Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809) inferred from mtDNA sequence analysis. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 1343–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shen, K.N.; Tzeng, W.N. Reproductive strategy and recruitment dynamics of amphidromous goby Sicyopterus japonicus as revealed by otolith microstructure. J. Fish Biol. 2008, 73, 2497–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Iida, M.; Watanabe, S.; Shinoda, A.; Tsukamoto, K. Recruitment of the amphidromous goby Sicyopterus japonicus to the estuary of the Ota River, Wakayama, Japan. Environ. Biol. Fish. 2008, 83, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Excoffier, L.; Lischer, H.E. Arlequin suite ver. 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10, 564–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Excoffier, L.; Smouse, P.E.; Quattro, J.M. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 1992, 131, 479–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Stanley, H.F.; Casey, S.; Carnahan, J.M.; Goodman, S.; Harwood, J.; Wayne, K. Worldwide patterns of mitochondrial DNA differentiation in the harbor seal (Phoca vitulina). Mol. Biol. Evol. 1996, 13, 368–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Tajima, F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 1989, 123, 585–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fu, Y.X. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 1997, 147, 915–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mantel, N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 1967, 27, 209–220. [Google Scholar]
  49. Sezmis, E. The Population Genetic Structure of Portunus pelagicus in Australian Waters. Ph.D Thesis, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  50. Crandall, K.A.; Templeton, A.R. Empirical tests of some predictions from coalescent theory with applications to intraspecific phylogeny reconstruction. Genetics 1993, 134, 959–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Chiang, T.Y.; Schaal, B.A. Phylogeography of North American populations of the moss species Hylocomium splendens based on the nucleotide sequence of internal transcribed spacer 2 of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Mol. Ecol. 1999, 8, 1037–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, J.P.; Hsu, K.C.; Chiang, T.Y. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of Acrossocheilus paradoxus (Cyprinidae) in Taiwan. Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9, 1483–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, N.S.; Zhao, S.; Wasiliev, B. Geology of Marginal Sea in the North West Pacific; Heilongjiang Education Press: Harbin, China, 2000. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  54. Ren, G.; Ma, H.; Ma, C.; Wang, W.; Chen, W.; Ma, L. Genetic diversity and population structure of Portunus sanguinolentus (Herbst, 1783) revealed by mtDNA COI sequences. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2017, 28, 740–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Grant, W.S.; Bowen, B.W. Shallow population histories in deep evolutionary lineages of marinefishes: Insights from sardines and anchovies and lessons for conservation. J. Hered. 1998, 89, 415–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ma, H.Y.; Ma, C.Y.; Li, C.H.; Lu, J.X.; Zou, X.; Gong, Y.Y.; Wang, W.; Chen, W.; Ma, L.; Xia, L.J. First mitochondrial genome for the red crab (Charybdis feriata) with implication of phylogenomics and population genetics. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Xu, J.; Chu, K.H. Genome scan of the mitten crab Eriocheir sensu stricto in East Asia: Population differentiation, hybridization and adaptive speciation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2012, 64, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Abdul Halim, S.A.A.; Othman, A.S.; Akib, N.A.M.; Jamaludin, N.A.; Esa, Y.; Nor, S.A.M. Mitochondrial markers identify a genetic boundary of the Green Tiger Prawn (Penaeus semisulcatus) in the Indo-Pacific Ocean. Zool. Stud. 2021, 60, 8. [Google Scholar]
  59. Benzie, J.A.H.; Williams, S.T. Genetic structure of giant clam (Tridacna maxima) populations in the West Pacific is not consistent with dispersal by present-day ocean currents. Evolution 1997, 51, 768–783. [Google Scholar]
  60. Dall, W.; Hill, J.; Rothlisberg, P.C.; Staples, D.J. The Biology of Penaeidae. Advances in Marine Biology 27; Blaxter, J.H.S., Southward, A.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  61. Wenner, A.M. Sex ratio as a function of size in marine Crustacea. Am. Nat. 1972, 106, 321–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Campbell, G.R.; Fielder, D.R. Size at sexual maturity and occurrence of ovigerous females in three species of commercially exploited portunid crabs in S.E. Queensland. Proc. R. Soc. Qld. 1986, 97, 79–87. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kepel, A.A.; Tsareva, L.A. First record of tropical crabs Portunus sanguinolentus (Herbst, 1783) and Plagusia depressatuberculate Lamarck, 1818 in Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 2005, 31, 124–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chan, B.K.K.; Tsang, L.M.; Chu, K.H. Morphological and genetic differentiation of the acorn barnacle Tetraclita squamosa (Crustacea, Cirripedia) in East Asia and description of a new species of Tetraclita. Zool. Scr. 2007, 36, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tsang, L.M.; Wu, T.H.; Shih, H.T.; Williams, G.A.; Chu, K.H.B.; Chan, K.K. Genetic and morphological differentiation of the Indo-West Pacific intertidal barnacle Chthamalus malayensis. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2012, 52, 388–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Wong, K.J.H.; Chan, B.K.K.; Shih, H.T. Taxonomy of the sand bubbler crabs Scopimera globosa De Haan, 1835, and S. tuberculata Stimpson, 1858 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Dotillidae) in East Asia with description of a new species from the Ryukyus, Japan. Zootaxa 2010, 2345, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Sampling localities of Portunus sanguinolentus and haplotype frequencies in East Asia. In Table 1, the numbers of lineages A and B are also shown.
Figure 1. Sampling localities of Portunus sanguinolentus and haplotype frequencies in East Asia. In Table 1, the numbers of lineages A and B are also shown.
Jmse 10 00281 g001
Figure 2. Neighbor-joining (NJ) tree based on control region gene sequences with bootstrap values (NJ/ML, respectively) for P. sanguinolentus.
Figure 2. Neighbor-joining (NJ) tree based on control region gene sequences with bootstrap values (NJ/ML, respectively) for P. sanguinolentus.
Jmse 10 00281 g002
Figure 3. The haplotype network of Portunus sanguinolentus in all sampling sites.
Figure 3. The haplotype network of Portunus sanguinolentus in all sampling sites.
Jmse 10 00281 g003
Figure 4. The relationships between seven sampling sites are shown in an UPGMA tree.
Figure 4. The relationships between seven sampling sites are shown in an UPGMA tree.
Jmse 10 00281 g004
Figure 5. A sudden expansion model of the swimming crab P. sanguinolentus predicts the observed pair-wise differences and mismatch distributions.
Figure 5. A sudden expansion model of the swimming crab P. sanguinolentus predicts the observed pair-wise differences and mismatch distributions.
Jmse 10 00281 g005
Table 1. Codes of sampling sites, sample sizes (n), number of haplotypes (nh), gene diversity (h), nucleotide diversity (π) and Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs statistics for seven populations of Portunus sanguinolentus in East Asia.
Table 1. Codes of sampling sites, sample sizes (n), number of haplotypes (nh), gene diversity (h), nucleotide diversity (π) and Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs statistics for seven populations of Portunus sanguinolentus in East Asia.
CodeSample SitennhLineage 1Lineage 2h Diversityπ DiversityTajima’s DFu’s Fs
SHShanghai, China18141800.961 ± 0.0340.00478 ± 0.00097−1.8221 *−7.429 *
TCTaichung, Taiwan25252501.000 ± 0.0110.00818 ± 0.00818−1.6345 −22.885 **
XMXiamen, China18111800.856 ± 0.0790.00372 ± 0.00110−1.7473 −4.134
DGDonggang, Taiwan16131600.967 ± 0.0360.00596 ± 0.00088−0.9149 −5.639 *
HKHong Kong, China11111101.000 ± 0.0390.00652 ± 0.00078−0.7909 −6.454 *
YLYilan, Taiwan15151501.000 ± 0.0240.00909 ± 0.00111−0.9552 −8.867 **
SGPSingapore, Singapore77071.000 ± 0.0760.01345 ± 0.001731.0533 −1.300
Lineage A 10383 0.987 ± 0.0060.00780 ± 0.00054−2.1899 **−114.956 **
Lineage B 77 1.000 ± 0.0760.01345 ± 0.001731.0533 −1.300
Total 11090 0.988 ± 0.0050.01149 ± 0.00135−2.04282*−105.649 **
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Table 2. The matrices shown below show pairwise FST (below diagonal) and p values (above diagonal) for seven populations of P. sanguinolentus in East Asia.
Table 2. The matrices shown below show pairwise FST (below diagonal) and p values (above diagonal) for seven populations of P. sanguinolentus in East Asia.
SHYLXMTCDGHKSGP
SH-0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
YL0.354 -0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
XM0.063 0.342 -0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000
TC0.055 0.242 0.030 -0.000 0.000 0.000
DG0.182 0.274 0.136 0.075 -0.000 0.000
HK0.321 0.153 0.315 0.198 0.167 -0.000
SGP0.790 0.734 0.822 0.742 0.767 0.739 -
Table 3. The results of AMOVA for P. sanguinolentus in seven populations in East Asia.
Table 3. The results of AMOVA for P. sanguinolentus in seven populations in East Asia.
PopulationGroupingSource of VariationPercentage of VariationΦ-Statisticsp (More-Extreme Value)
One groupGroup 1{SH, YL, TC, XM, DG, HK, SGP}AP42.59ΦST = 0.42592***
WP57.41
Two groupsGroup 1{SH, YL, TC, XM, DG, HK}AG75.19ΦCT =0.75194***
Group 2 {SGP}AP/WG4.45ΦSC =0.17932***
WP20.36ΦST = 0.79643***
Three groupsGroup 1 {SH, XM, TC, DG}AG52.28ΦCT =0.52277***
Group 2 {HK, YL}AP/WG4.27ΦSC = 0.08937***
Group 3 {SGP}WP43.46ΦST =0.56542***
Four groupsGroup 1{SH, XM, TC}AG45.71ΦCT = 0.45707***
Group 2 {DG}AP/WG4.05ΦSC = 0.07457***
Group 3{HK, YL}WP50.24ΦST = 0.49755***
Group 4{SGP}
Five groupsGroup 1{SH}AG40.23ΦCT = 0.40227***
Group 2 {XM, TC}AP/WG5.16ΦSC = 0.08627***
Group 3{DG}WP54.62ΦST = 0.45384***
Group 4{HK, YL}
Group 5{SGP}
AG is the among-group component of variance; AP/WG is the among-populations/within-group component of variance; and WP is the within-population component of variance. *** p < 0.001 by the permutation test.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, Y.-M.; Shih, C.-H.; Chen, P.-C.; Kao, W.-C.; Lee, Y.-C.; Han, Y.-S.; Tzeng, T.-D. Phylogeography and Genetic Structure of the Swimming Crabs Portunus sanguinolentus (Herbst, 1783) in East Asia. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10020281

AMA Style

Lu Y-M, Shih C-H, Chen P-C, Kao W-C, Lee Y-C, Han Y-S, Tzeng T-D. Phylogeography and Genetic Structure of the Swimming Crabs Portunus sanguinolentus (Herbst, 1783) in East Asia. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022; 10(2):281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10020281

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Yu-Ming, Chun-Han Shih, Po-Cheng Chen, Wei-Chieh Kao, Ying-Chou Lee, Yu-San Han, and Tzong-Der Tzeng. 2022. "Phylogeography and Genetic Structure of the Swimming Crabs Portunus sanguinolentus (Herbst, 1783) in East Asia" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10, no. 2: 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10020281

APA Style

Lu, Y. -M., Shih, C. -H., Chen, P. -C., Kao, W. -C., Lee, Y. -C., Han, Y. -S., & Tzeng, T. -D. (2022). Phylogeography and Genetic Structure of the Swimming Crabs Portunus sanguinolentus (Herbst, 1783) in East Asia. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(2), 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10020281

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop