Beach Conditions for Guiding the Sandy Beach Management in Phuket, Thailand

Abstract

Thailand’s current beach management strategies lack integration across sectors, resulting in conflicts of interest and insufficient consideration of diverse beach uses. The complexity of environmental, socio-economic, and coastal disasters challenge policymakers to describe the conditions of sandy beaches, and the most effective coastal management adaptation measures. This study suggests an integrated approach to evaluate beach conditions by incorporating the Urbanization Index, Conservation Index, and Recreation Index. Furthermore, the assessment of beach conditions will include the Threat Index, which consists of erosion rates and shoreline recession caused by sea level rise. The trends index will prioritize beach conditions for appropriate management actions. The study suggests management strategies that aim to preserve the physical and environmental aspects of the beach, while restoring its functionality for ecosystem services by applying engineering structures with beach nourishment. The main purpose of this study is to develop a beach condition that can be used as a guideline for sandy beach management in Thailand. It provides insights and recommendations to policymakers for enhancing the sustainability and resilience of Thailand’s coastal areas in the face of urbanization and climate change.

1. Introduction

Beaches are dynamic areas that change as a result of natural processes. In Thailand, beach areas are essential for various uses, such as fishing, biological diversity, and recreation. Furthermore, urbanization in the coastal zone leads to the development of activities close to the shoreline. Nowadays, the physical environment of beaches is impacted by human activities and the effects of climate change, such as sea level rise and the frequency of storm surges [1,2].

Moreover, coastal activities in Phuket Island are increasing because of the growing number of tourists visiting the region due to the sea–sand–sun tourism project supported by the Ministry of Tourism and Sport, Thailand [3]. Therefore, the use of beaches has intensified, potentially leading to environmental overcapacity and subsequent physical and ecological degradation in the tourism industry at the local levels [4,5].

Various approaches have been proposed to assess the beach condition of tourist sandy beaches that integrate indicators related to physical, ecological, and socio-economic issues [6,7,8,9]. However, these approaches often focus on the hedonic and functional aspects of sandy beaches, and lack an integration of ecological metrics [10].

Conserving the ecological and biological aspects of the beach, specifically the dunes, is essential for the preservation of wildlife [11]. Coastal dunes serve as a habitat for various organisms, and are involved in organic exchange, while marine turtles rely on beaches for nesting. These components indicate beach conditions, and can guide management strategies to protect these habitats. These characteristics show that sandy beaches are socio-ecological systems, thus their management requires an integrative approach to assess sandy beach conditions.

Thailand’s current beach management strategies are separated and lack integration across sectors. The management strategies have not adequately addressed the integration of beach uses, such as tourism and conservation [12]. Furthermore, many beaches in Phuket encounter conflicts of interest due to divergent service purposes within the same areas, such as fishing villages and recreational activities. Therefore, it is crucial to assess beach management by integrating various beach uses collectively.

The growing tourism demand has increased pressure on beaches, threatening their utilization as economic, recreational, natural, and resource assets [12]. In 2007, a study on Function Analyses in Spain found that beach managers had mainly considered the recreational function of beaches, with the natural and protective functions being focused on with secondary importance [7,13]. In 2021, Jurkus et al. applied GIS-detected parameters, such as beach width and distances from parking lots to the beach, among others, to assess the conditions necessary for ensuring tourism sustainability in the coastal areas of Lithuania [14]. It is also essential to apply beach management practices with new tools, including the physical, natural, and socio-economic characteristics of beaches [12].

In 2013, McLachlan et al. introduced the Conservation Index (CI) and Recreation Index (RI) indices to categorize sandy beaches based on their primary use, informing their management guidelines [15]. Then, Cardoso et al. included the Urbanization Index (UI) and other indices for analysis in 2016. These three indicators are relatively easy to measure, enabling a quick assessment of the beach conditions [16,17]. Several factors determine the potential beach conditions based on various viewpoints, such as socio-economic, ecosystems, and available recreation infrastructure. Integrated approaches that assess beach conditions and prioritize management strategies have become increasingly important in the last decade [7].

The beach conditions contain physical and environmental parameters such as beach carrying capacity, beach width, dune height, dune vegetation, and turtle nest. In addition, socio-economic conditions include factors that human activity affects, such as pollution, infrastructures, and safety–security [18].

In recent years, integrated coastal management has been drawing attention in Thailand, despite the lack of a specific management policy. However, it is important to prioritize the sustainable management of beaches in filling the gap between recreation and conservation [6,19]. The literature review of management strategies includes the management issues of sandy beaches, which can be categorized into three main directions: protection, regulation, and restoration [2,12,15,20]. These previous studies introduced strategies that conserve the beach’s physical and ecological characteristics, including implementing buffer zones (Dunes). The regulation strategies were determined to deal with the environmental policies and related practices such as pollution control, carrying capacity, and beach zoning implementation. Finally, restoration measures were defined to recover the beach’s functionality and capacity to provide ecosystem services [10]. Moreover, this study improved the restoration measures by integrating beach nourishment implementation with engineering structures. This is particularly important as engineering structures often have a negative impact on beach areas, resulting in a reduction in the beach width in front of structures [21]. However, beach areas are crucial for promoting tourism and recreational activities. In this regard, beach nourishment develops as an effective strategy to extend the beach width and mitigate the adverse effects caused by engineering structures.

Climate change influences processes and dynamics in coastal zones through long-term changes in winds, wave actions, and extreme sea levels [22,23]. Nevertheless, shoreline changes vary from seasonal to interannual and long-term scales due to different trigger impacts such as erosion and flooding [24,25,26]. As such, this study aims to improve beach conditions by including the Threat Index (TI), encompassing erosion rates and shoreline recession resulting from sea level rise, in conjunction with physical, environmental, and socio-economic factors. Subsequently, the management strategies will be determined based on the trends index of the beach. The trends index was determined by identifying the maximum score from each index, enabling the classification of beach conditions according to their priority. The management strategies comprise three categories: protection, regulation, and restoration. This finding will support the future planning regulation or guidance of beach management.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Phuket is a famous tourist destination located in southern Thailand along the Andaman Sea (Figure 1). Phuket Island has 200 km of beach length. The eastern part of the island comprises mangrove, harbors, and muddy beaches. The study sites consist of 33 locations (

Table 1. Thirty-three sandy beaches’ locations on Phuket Island, Thailand.

Location	Name	Location	Name
PKT1	Saikaew Maikhaw and Naiyang Beach	PKT18	Amari Patong Beach
PKT2	Naithorn Beach	PKT19	Tritrung Beach
PKT3	Andaman White Beach	PKT20	Meesuk Beach
PKT4	Banana Beach	PKT21	Paradise Beach
PKT5	Trisara Beach	PKT22	Merlin Beach
PKT6	Anantara Layan Beach	PKT23	Freedom Beach
PKT7	Layan and Bangtao beach	PKT24	Karon-noi Beach
PKT8	Surin1 Beach	PKT25	Karon Beach
PKT9	Surin2 Beach	PKT26	Kata Beach
PKT10	Laemshing Beach	PKT27	Kata-noi Beach
PKT11	Kamala Beach	PKT28	Nui Beach
PKT12	Regency Beach	PKT29	Jungle Beach
PKT13	Hua Beach	PKT30	Saen Beach
PKT14	Naka Beach	PKT31	Naiharn Beach
PKT15	Thavorn Beach	PKT32	Yanui Beach
PKT16	Kamala-patong road	PKT33	Rawai Beach
PKT17	Patong Beach

) in the island’s western part, with the most famous sandy beaches (37 km). The average sediment grain size, beach width, and beach slope measured in the 20–26 April 2022 observations were 0.42 mm, 23.16 m, and 6.00 degrees. The tide data from Aowpor tide station associated with the Department of Marine Thailand from 2013 to 2021 show that the maximum, minimum, mean, and range are 1.67 m.msl, −2.29 m.msl, −0.18 m.msl, and 3.96 m.msl [27].

2.2. Method

The method contains two parts: assessing the beach conditions and identifying management strategies (Figure 2).

2.2.1. Assessing the Beach Conditions

The multi-purpose metrics are categorized into four indices to assess the Urbanization Index (UI), Conservation Index (CI), Recreation Index (RI), and Threat Index (TI) for trends in the use of the beaches.

The Urbanization Index (

Table 2. The urbanization Index (UI) consists of accessibility, noise pollution, wastewater pollution in the sea, and solid waste on the beach.

Category	Condition and Scores
Accessibility	0	1	2
	Difficult to directly access the beach	Can access but still have some conditions (Private hotel)	Easy access (Can directly access the beach easily)
Noise pollution (Distance to urban center)	0	1
	Absent	Present
Wastewater pollution into the sea	0	1
	Absent	Present
Solid waste on the beach	0	1
	Absent	Present

) comprises noise pollution, beach accessibility, solid waste on the beach, and wastewater pollution in the sea. The Conservation Index (

Table 3. The Recreation Index (RI) consists of physical carrying capacity, infrastructure, hotel with beach access, and safety–security.

Category	Condition and Score
Physical carrying capacity (m2)	0	1	2
	900 to 105,600	105,600 to 210,300	210,300 to 315,000
Infrastructure	0	1	2
	Absent	There are some umbrellas, sunbeds or toilets.	There are umbrellas, sunbeds and toilets.
Hotel with beach access	0	1
	Absent	Present
Safety–security	0	1
	Absent	Present

) includes dune height, beach width, dune vegetation, and turtle nests. The Recreation Index (

Table 4. Conservation Index (CI) consists of dune height, dune vegetation, beach width, and turtle nests.

Category	Condition and Score
Dune Height (m)	0	1	2
	0.8 to 1.7	1.7 to 2.6	2.6 to 3.5
Dune vegetation	0	1
	Absent	Present
Beach Width (m)	0	1	2
	4 to 18	18 to 34	34 to 50
Turtle Nests	0	1
	Absent	Present

) considers physical carrying capacity, infrastructure, hotel with beach access, and safety and security. The Threat Index (

Table 5. Threat Index (TI) consists of shoreline recession due to sea level rise analyzed via Bruun and the rate of shoreline change derived from a previous study [27].

Category	Condition and Score
Shoreline recession due to sea level rise (m)	0	1	2
	−9 to −28.67	−28.67 to −48.34	−48.34 to −68
Rate of shoreline changes (m/year)	0	1	2
	−4 to −0.67	−0.67 to 2.66	2.66 to 5.99

) evaluates the average rate of shoreline changes and shoreline recession caused by sea level rise.

Noise pollution, beach accessibility, the presence of solid waste on the beach, wastewater pollution into the sea, dune height, beach width, dune vegetation, infrastructure, hotel with beach access, and safety and security were interpreted via field observations. In contrast, physical carrying capacity, the average rate of shoreline changes, and shoreline recession due to sea level rise were estimated from the analysis.

Physical carrying capacity is calculated with beach width and beach length using Equation (1).

$$Physical carrying capacity=beach width\times beach length$$

(1)

The average rates of shoreline changes are evaluated by the Net Shoreline Movement (NSM) [28]. Therefore, the shoreline changes in each transaction are calculated using Equation (2). $D_1$ is the shoreline position in the latest year and $D_2$ is the shoreline position in the earliest year. The shoreline position refers to the mean sea level, and each transaction is undertaken at 20 m to 500 m, depending on the shoreline lengths.

$$Shoreline changes=D_2-D_1$$

(2)

The Bruun rule (Equation (3)) has been chosen to estimate the future shoreline recession due to sea level rise [29], where Δy is shoreline recession, S is the rising of the sea level, $B_h$ is the berm height, and $h_{\ast }$ is the distance from the horizontal to the closure depth, while $y_{\ast }$ is the depth of closure [30].

$$\frac{∆y}{y_{\ast }}=\frac{S}{h_{\ast }+B_h}$$

(3)

A previous study addressing shoreline change analysis demonstrated the method for shoreline recession and shoreline change estimation with coastal management in Phuket, Thailand [27].

Each parameter was normalized and scored accordingly. UI, RI, CI, and TI were calculated by Equation (4).

$$\mathrm{X}\mathrm{I}=\frac{(x_a+x_b+x_c+\dots )}{\left({\mathsf{Ʃ}x}_n\right)}$$

(4)

XI is the beach conditions index (UI, RI, CI, and TI) and $x_a,x_b,x_c,\dots$ are the parameters in that index. ${\mathsf{Ʃ}x}_n$ is a summarization of all the parameters.

Table 2 shows the Urbanization Index indicators. Accessibility was indicated by the level of difficulty encountered in accessing the beach. Noise pollution was related to field observations in the surrounding environment and the distance of the beach to the urban center. It is hypothesized that beaches near urban centers, communities, or central infrastructure are more likely to experience noise pollution. Wastewater pollution into the sea (Figure 3) and solid waste on the beach (Figure 4) were monitored via field observations.

The Recreation Index is shown in Table 3. Infrastructure is essential for the recreational use of beaches [16]. Hotels with beach access and their safety–security are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6.

The Conservation Index is presented in Table 4. The measurement of dune height and dune vegetation is depicted in Figure 7. Dune height was determined relative to the mean sea level, and data on dune vegetation factors were obtained through field observations. The turtle nest (Figure 8) factors were observed using information from the Department of Marine and Coastal Resources of Thailand, along with details from local people.

2.2.2. Identifying Management Strategies

The management strategies were derived from the literature, which separated the approaches into three main directions: protection, regulation, and restoration (

Table 6. Management strategies ¹ implemented for sandy beaches.

A. Protection Measures	B. Regulation Measure	C. Restoration Measures
A1 Maintenance of dune vegetation	B1 Management of the beach access	C1 Beach cleaning
A2 Biodiversity conservation	B2 Determine carrying capacity	C2 Beach nourishment
	B3 Implement beach zoning	C3 Dune restoration/rehabilitation
	B4 Control pollution	C4 Engineering structures with beach nourishment

¹ Modified from [2,12,15,21].

) [2,12,15,20]. Protection strategies preserve the physical and ecological aspects of the beach. The appropriate regulatory strategies for implementing environmental policies include controlling access, managing carrying capacity, implementing pollution control measures, and defining zones for specific uses and activities. The restoration strategies were adjusted to recover the function of the beaches, so as to provide ecosystem services related to use trends [7]. The management strategies were proposed in relation to beach conditions and trends in usage. Since many beaches are primarily used for tourism, it is crucial to prioritize maintaining these areas in the face of rising sea levels and erosion. This study added the C4 measures (engineering structures and beach nourishment) to adjust the management strategies implemented for sandy beaches, as derived from the previous research undertaken by Ocaña et al. (2022) [10] into alternative adaptation strategies for tourism beaches.

3. Results and Discussion

The results and discussion sections present the assessment of beach conditions and the corresponding management strategies.

3.1. Beach Conditions Assessment

The beach condition assessment results are presented in

Table 7. The assessment of beach conditions using factors included in each index, such as area accessibility, noise pollution, wastewater pollution into the sea, solid waste on the beach, physical carrying capacity, hotel with beach access, infrastructure, safety–security, dune vegetation, beach width, dune height, turtle nest, beach erosion, and shoreline recession due to sea level rise. The total index score was calculated by summarizing all the factors.

Locations	Accessibility	Noise Pollution (Distance to Urban Center)	Wastewater Pollution into the Sea	Solid Waste on the Beach	Urbanization Index	Physical Carrying Capacity	Hotel with Beach Access	Infrastructure	Safety–Security	Recreation Index	Dune Vegetation	Beach Width	Dune Height	Turtle Nest	Conservation Index	Erosion	Shoreline Recession	Threat Index	Total Score
PKT1	2	1	1	0	4	2	1	2	0	5	1	1	2	1	4	1	2	3	16
PKT2	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	2	0	0	2	2	2	4	8
PKT3	1	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	0	2	0	2	0	0	2	2	2	4	9
PKT4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	1	2	2	4	5
PKT5	1	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	0	2	1	0	0	0	0	1	1	2	5
PKT6	1	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	4
PKT7	2	1	1	1	5	1	1	1	0	3	1	1	1	0	2	1	2	3	13
PKT8	1	0	1	0	2	0	1	1	0	2	1	2	0	0	2	1	2	3	9
PKT9	1	1	1	0	3	0	0	1	1	2	1	2	0	0	2	0	2	2	9
PKT10	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	1	1	2	3	4
PKT11	2	1	0	0	3	0	1	1	0	2	0	0	1	0	1	2	2	4	10
PKT12	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	2	4
PKT13	2	0	0	1	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	1	2	6
PKT14	1	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	0	2	0	0	1	0	1	1	2	3	7
PKT15	1	0	1	0	2	0	1	1	0	2	0	0	1	0	1	2	1	3	8
PKT16	2	1	1	1	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	2	3	9
PKT17	2	1	1	1	5	0	0	2	1	3	0	1	0	0	1	1	2	3	12
PKT18	1	0	0	0	1	0	1	2	0	3	0	0	1	0	1	0	2	2	7
PKT19	1	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	0	2	0	0	1	0	1	1	2	3	7
PKT20	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	2	3	4
PKT21	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	1	2	3
PKT22	1	0	1	0	2	0	1	2	1	4	0	1	1	0	2	1	1	2	10
PKT23	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	1	1	2	3	4
PKT24	1	0	0	0	1	0	1	2	1	4	0	1	1	0	2	1	2	3	10
PKT25	2	1	1	1	5	1	1	2	1	5	1	2	1	0	3	2	2	4	17
PKT26	2	1	1	0	4	0	1	2	0	3	0	2	2	0	4	1	2	3	14
PKT27	2	1	0	0	3	0	1	2	0	3	0	2	0	0	2	1	2	3	11
PKT28	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	2
PKT29	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	2	3
PKT30	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	1	1	0	1	3
PKT31	1	1	1	1	4	0	0	2	0	2	1	2	1	0	3	1	2	3	12
PKT32	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	1	1	2	3	6
PKT33	2	1	1	1	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	7

and Figure 9. The scores of the factors are displayed in Table 7. The results show that all beaches have a Threat Index (TI). In contrast, some beaches have a Conservation Index (CI), an Urbanization Index (UI), or a Recreation Index (RI). Therefore, it is crucial to prioritize the assessment of the Threat Index in order to determine the conditions affecting the beaches.

In this study, the parameter scores ranged from 0 to 2, reflecting the classification of primary data observed during the field survey. The scores can be further enhanced by increasing the quantitative measurements of the parameters. Additionally, it is imperative to note that the parameters were determined based on a literature review that may not have fully captured the context of Thailand’s tourist beaches. Therefore, enhancing the quantitative parameters through effective management planning and reassessing the scoring range after implementing the necessary improvements is imperative. This expansion of quantitative data will allow for a more comprehensive evaluation of beach conditions.

The findings of this study suggest that the absence of an Urbanization Index (UI), Recreation Index (RI), and Conservation Index (CI) in specific locations warrants the inclusion of these parameters in beach management assessments to ensure the sustainable environmental management and appropriate utilization of the beach.

Furthermore, guiding the integrated development of beaches can facilitate urbanization while encouraging the preservation of their natural resources, which was promoted in the 20-Year National Strategy of Thailand (2018–2037) [31]. The assessment of beach conditions supports the indicator aimed at promoting sustainable economic growth based on maritime activities. It considers the scores of each parameter to establish an integrated coastal management policy.

It would be advantageous to align this assessment of beach conditions with international coastal zone management in the pursuit of target 14.7 of Goal 14 of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which aims to enhance the economic benefits of developing small island states and the least developed countries through the sustainable utilization of marine resources [32]. Conversely, it is essential to consider the factors used to assess each index concerning the specific use of individual beaches.

3.2. Management Strategies

Based on the trends index (Figure 10) and the parameter scores set out in each index, management strategies have been suggested for each location in

Table 8. Potential management strategies.

Locations	Trends Index	Management Strategies
PKT1	RI	B1, B2, B3, C1, C2
PKT2	TI	C2, C3, C4
PKT3	TI	C2, C3, C4
PKT4	TI	C2, C3, C4
PKT5	RI, TI	B1, B2, B3, C1, C2, C3, C4
PKT6	RI	B1, B2, B3, C1, C2
PKT7	UI	B3, B4, C1
PKT8	TI	C2, C3, C4
PKT9	UI	B3, B4, C1
PKT10	TI	C2, C3, C4
PKT11	TI	C2, C3, C4
PKT12	UI, TI	C1, B4
PKT13	UI	B3, B4, C1
PKT14	TI	C2, C3, C4
PKT15	TI	C2, C3, C4
PKT16	UI	B3, B4, C1
PKT17	UI	B3, B4, C1
PKT18	RI	B2, B3, C1, C2
PKT19	TI	C2, C3, C4
PKT20	TI	C2, C3, C4
PKT21	TI	C3, C4
PKT22	RI	B2, B3, C1, C2
PKT23	TI	C2, C3, C4
PKT24	RI	B2, B3, C1, C2
PKT25	RI	B2, B3, C1, C2
PKT26	UI, CI	A1, A2, B3, B4, C1
PKT27	UI, RI, TI	B1, B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, C3, C4
PKT28	RI, TI	B1, B2, B3, C1, C2, C3, C4
PKT29	TI	C2, C3, C4
PKT30	RI, CI, TI	A1, A2, B1, B2, B3, C1, C2, C3, C4
PKT31	UI	B3, B4, C1
PKT32	TI	C2, C3, C4
PKT33	UI	B3, B4, C1

. The trends index is evident in TI, UI, and RI, but not in CI. Moreover, the trends index is in some locations indicated by multiple indices, such as at Kata Beach (PKT26), Kata-noi Beach (PKT27) and Saen Beach (PKT30).

It is suggested that beaches with a trend index expressed in RI and UI should be subjected to regulation and restoration measures. At the same time, protection measures should be selected as potential management strategies for the primary purpose of beach use in relation to the CI. Several restoration measures have been suggested for beaches with a trends index in relation to the TI index. It is necessary to mitigate the risks of natural changes while preserving beach areas for recreational activities.

The most significant aspect of the 33 study locations is reflected by the Threat Index, which indicates that many tourism beaches in Phuket are exposed to natural hazards, such as coastal erosion and sea level rise. The next most important is the Urbanization Index, which signifies that the beach areas are experiencing increased urban development. The Urbanization Index is related to litter and pollution from wastewater discharges into the sea, or runoff from roads along the beach, resulting in coastal erosion and increased risks.

In cases with a multiple trends index, potential management strategies should be introduced to cover and support various beach conditions. Moreover, the trends index will show the priority management issues of each beach. This helps promote the integrated use of the beach and preserve it from natural and human-induced threats.

The results indicate that the beach nourishment strategy (C2) is the most commonly employed across the thirty-three study locations. Due to the expansion of beach areas facilitated by beach nourishment, tourism activities such as beach recreation, sunbathing, and beach play are well-supported.

In Thailand, it is evident that there is currently no specific management policy for tourism beaches [12]. However, the findings of this study can be incorporated into the sustainable coastal management policy framework, aligning with the targets outlined in Thailand’s 20-Year National Strategy. The implemented management strategies aim to support the sustainable conservation, rehabilitation, and development of natural resources. Additionally, these strategies establish ecological landscape plans that will promote integrated urban and conservation area development in harmony with the carrying capacity of the respective region [31].

Furthermore, the enhanced management strategies for sandy beaches proposed in this study have the potential to be implemented in international coastal zone management, supporting the objectives outlined in the SDGs. Focusing on the threat represented by sea level rise caused by climate change leads us to target 13.2 of Goal 13, which aims to integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning. By incorporating climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies into beach management practices, policymakers can work towards achieving this target and ensuring the long-term resilience of coastal areas [32]. Implementing beach nourishment helps towards target 14.c of Goal 14, which aims to enhance the conservation and sustainable use of oceans and resources by implementing international law, as reflected in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. This includes the sustainable management of fisheries, aquaculture, and tourism. Increasing the beach area through nourishment can contribute to economic growth by supporting recreational activities [32]. Moreover, beach areas are essential for conserving wildlife species that inhabit these coastal environments.

4. Conclusions

The tourism beaches in Phuket, Thailand face natural and human-induced threats. This study proposes to evaluate the beach conditions by use of four indices: the Urbanization Index (UI), the Conservation Index (CI), the Recreation Index (RI), and the Threat Index (TI). The factors in each index include noise pollution, beach accessibility, solid waste on the beach, wastewater pollution in the sea, dune height, beach width, dune vegetation, turtle nests, physical carrying capacity, infrastructure, hotels with beach access, safety and security, the average rate of shoreline changes and shoreline recession due to sea level rise. The narrow score ranges of each parameter can be expanded by implementing a comprehensive management plan and reassessing them following the necessary improvements. The existence of the Threat Index is evident in all beaches, emphasizing the necessity of concentrating on integrating adaptation measures into the management planning of the beaches so as to mitigate these threats effectively. Identifying the multiple trends index on various beaches influences the potential management strategies. This study suggests management strategies aiming in three main directions: protection, regulation, and restoration, based on the integrated assessment of beach conditions with the trends index. Improving management strategies contributes to achieving the 20-Year National Strategy of Thailand and the Sustainable Development Goals, and mainly the target of integrating climate change into national policies and increasing the economic benefits through sustainable management. This finding can be used as a guideline for policymakers to prioritize the essential issues associated with each beach in Phuket. The framework developed in this study can be utilized in other study sites to assess beach conditions and inform decision-making processes regarding management strategies.