4.1. Surface Signature
The long-term temperature variations in the Black Sea indicate two distinct phases marked by decadal oscillations: a cooling phase from 1960 to 1993, followed by a warming phase that began in 1993 and continued thereafter [
1,
25,
30,
31]. The decadal oscillations are primarily influenced by the North Atlantic oscillation (NAO) and shorter oscillations associated with the East Atlantic/West Russia (EA-WR) oscillation [
1,
25]. The warming trend in SST and CIL temperatures from 1993 to 2013 was shown in [
16]; the SST trend was extended until 2022 in this study.
Figure 2a illustrates the persistent warming trend (0.39 °C per decade), with the mean winter SST reaching 10.01 °C in 2020 and 9.99 °C in 2021, marking exceptionally warm years for 2000–2022. Notably, the 10.01 °C recorded in 2020 stands as the highest winter SST since the 1960s, surpassing the previous peak of 9.75 °C in 1963 [
16].
A larger timeframe, starting from 2019, is necessary for analyzing the ocean reactions to March 2022 cold episodes, as the CIL retains a memory of atmospheric conditions from previous winters [
17,
18]. In 2020 and 2021, mean SSTs consistently exceeded 8 °C; in February 2022, these dropped slightly below 8 °C, reached 7.90 °C, and finally decreased down to 7.58 °C following the two consecutive episodes in March 2022 (
Figure 2b). To understand the prevailing conditions in the Black Sea prior to the cold intrusions of 2022, SST and surface heat fluxes were analyzed starting from early 2019. In 2022, SST dropped below 8 °C after two warmer years. In the beginning of February 2022, the temperature dipped slightly below 8 °C, reaching 7.90 °C, and eventually dropped to 7.58 °C following two consecutive cold episodes in March 2022, as indicated by the red shading in
Figure 2b. The winter SST decline was a response to increased heat loss, where the basin-wide daily mean heat flux reached up to −400 W/m
2 (
Figure 2c). Following the winter cooling, cold intrusions in March triggered a second peak in heat loss, with fluxes reaching approximately −250 W/m
2. The lowest SST was observed in March 2022 during the Siberian cold episode.
Figure 2d–g display the monthly mean SST maps. The spatial variations in SST are linked to the distribution of heat content and the local dynamics, characterized by cyclonic circulation dominating the basin’s interior and anticyclonic eddies meandering around the periphery of the Rim Current [
31]. The coldest temperatures were observed in the shallow, less saline waters of the NWS region throughout all seasons.
Figure 2d shows that in January, the coldest temperatures were confined to the NWS area. In February, temperatures below 8 °C expanded into the interior cyclonic area and the western half of the basin (
Figure 2e). By March, cold outbreaks significantly intensified the surface heat loss, leading to a pronounced basin-wide drop in SST, with the temperatures below 8 °C expanding across the basin, except in the northeastern region (
Figure 2f). However, by April, this cold area became restricted to the NWS with the onset of seasonal warming (
Figure 2g).
Figure 3a,c,e display the SST anomalies’ (SSTAs’) distribution along with SST contours for selected dates during the first and second episodes, as well as during the subsequent period. On March 10, the coldest waters on the Northwestern Shelf and along the western and southern coasts gradually moved eastward, following the periphery of the Rim Current. Simultaneously, the cyclonic circulation of the Rim Current transported relatively warmer water westward from the east [
4,
8,
10]. By the second episode on March 18 and in the following period, SST decreased further, and cold anomalies intensified.
Evaluating the spatio-temporal SSTA for March 2022,
Figure 3a reveals a noticeable gradient in SST, as well as in SSTA, which increases from west to east over the first episode. The SST gradient aligns with the climatological monthly means in March [
32]; however, the intrusion of cold air from the west resulted in a cooler SST in the western basin when compared to the climatological mean temperatures. The sharp gradient in SSTA, during the first intrusion, was reduced by the second episode (
Figure 3c). In the next couple of days, negative anomalies were extended across almost half of the basin. Throughout the first cold episode, cooling was primarily effective in the western basin, whereas for the second episode, together with the local circulation dynamics, cooling was effective all over the basin. This second episode resulted in a substantial change, with negative SSTA across the entire basin and an additional ~0.3 °C decrease in SST (
Figure 3c). Following the second episode, SSTA rose up to −1 °C along the periphery in the western and southern regions of the Black Sea (
Figure 3e).
SLA fields are displayed in
Figure 3b,d,f. The circulation structure is characterized by a narrow Rim Current that includes two decoupled gyre systems, which became separated at approximately longitude 38° (
Figure 3b). The western cyclonic gyre system was extending to southeastward, covering most of the basin and consisting of three mesoscale cyclonic gyres within it. These cyclonic gyres appear to have been strengthened by the second cold episode (
Figure 3d). Flow at the narrow channel separating the southeastern cyclonic gyre from its larger counterpart weakened (
Figure 3d). The meandering Rim Current was intensified by the second cold intrusion, where the Rim Current jet flow exhibited varying velocities, reaching 50–70 cm/s in the west and up to 100 cm/s in the southwest section (
Figure 3d). Indeed, these velocities corresponded to the highest climatologic geostrophic velocities of the Rim Current [
3,
9]. Finally, during the subsequent period, the Rim Current developed into a continuous, basin-wide cyclonic system (
Figure 3f). This system involved all four gyres, which became interconnected. The western gyre extended to around 34°N, while the other three gyres were positioned in the interior half of the basin, forming a continuous cyclonic system. The anti-cyclonic eddies over the Rim Current periphery began to weaken (
Figure 3f).
Anticyclonic eddies intensified by the second episode, caused a drastic drop in SLAs in the entire interior cyclonic area. Positive high sea-level anomalies (~8 cm) in the cyclonic interior area (
Figure 3b) dropped to ~−10 cm (
Figure 3f). The intense circulation period observed from March 17 to 25 had gradually diminished by the end of the month.
4.2. Vertical Structures and CIW Formation
In order to evaluate the vertical structures in the uppermost water column, 5 Argo floats were selected out of 13 active floats over the Black Sea in 2022 (
Figure 4a). The trajectories of the selected floats (3001854 across the north to southwest, 3902005 in the south along the southern Rim Current zone, 6903867 and 690366 in the central zone, and 7900595 in the southeast Black Sea) provided good coverage which dynamically resembled different areas in the Black Sea (
Figure 4a). Integrated time variations in temperature compiled from floats were examined against both depth and density coordinates. The time window size was kept larger to capture the abrupt changes in water column temperature and stability during the cold events. Considering the spatial variability of the Argo floats within this time window, SLAs and heat flux were specifically evaluated at the float positions to account for the local dynamics.
The yellow frame in
Figure 4b–m highlights two successive cold episodes and following intense dynamic periods. Over this timeframe, there was a simultaneous decrease in upper layer temperatures (<8 °C) observed for all floats, as depicted in
Figure 4d–m. The SLAs and surface heat fluxes extracted along Argo float trajectories are depicted in
Figure 4b,d. The extracted heat fluxes showed two minima, one in January and the other in March. The heat loss over the prevailing warm waters in January did not result in any CIW formation. However, the relatively weaker March episodes led to significant cooling in the mixed-layer water column. The SLA indicated a sharp transition from +17 cm to −17 cm over a two-week period within the highlighted yellow timeframe. The notable decreasing gradients of SLAs and heat flux were observed during the second episode. The maximum cooling in March, within the marked yellow timeframe, reached 250 W m
−2 and was observed at the positions of Argo floats in the northwestern Rim Current zone, followed by the interior cyclonic area, with weaker cooling in the southern periphery.
In February, Argo float 3901854 travelled along the northeastern edge of the Rim Current (
Figure 4d,e), where the upper-layer temperatures were above 8 °C. As shown in
Figure 2e, the temperatures in the northeastern region were higher than those in the northwestern part because of the advection of warmer waters from the east by the Rim Current [
8,
10]. Argo float 3901854 travelled to the edge of the NWS in the cold-episode period. The float recorded temperatures under ~8 °C in this area over the first event. When the second cold episode occurred, the float was still in the north and drifting on the continental slope of the NWS close to the anticyclonic eddy formed in the NWS, as seen from SLA maps on 18 and 25 March (
Figure 3d,f). Previous modelling efforts and observations demonstrated that the northwestern cross-shelf area was a major contributor to the CIW formation by transporting the cold NWS waters isopycnally to the deep interior [
9,
12,
14,
33]. When less saline and low-temperature waters of the northwestern shelf mixed with saline waters of the open interior, the density increased. That density increase caused cold-water penetration deeper into the water column. The anticyclones formed along the edge of the NWS, continually fed by cold waters from the coastal shelf, enhanced deep convection. After the second episode, Argo float records depicted a drop from 7.9 °C to 7.3 °C in the upper 50 m (
Figure 4d) accompanied by cold-water intrusion to a denser layer of 15.0 σ
t (
Figure 4e). The convective mixing shifted the lower boundary of the CIL remarkably at the 14.75 σ
t to 15.0 σ
t isopycnal surfaces. In mid-April, the thickness decreased to ~25 m, with a temperature of ~7.75 °C. The CIL temperature gradually increased during April and May as the float drifted southwest along the Rim Current.
The float 3902005 was on the southwestern Black Sea drifting along the Rim Current flow direction until the end of March; then, its path was altered to the interior basin in April. In January, near Bosporus, the float recorded mixed-layer temperatures above 9.3 °C. By the end of January and February, the mixed-layer temperatures were around 8 °C, yet the layer was not completely homogeneous (
Figure 4f,g). Following the first episode on 9–10 March, the mixed-layer temperatures dropped to 7.5 °C. Over the second episode between 17 and 20 March, a sharp decrease in SLAs (
Figure 4a) and strong geostrophic flows (~60 cm/s) at 3902005’s positions (
Figure 3d) indicated intense dynamics. The mixed layer deepened to nearly 60 m coincident with the sharp decrease in temperatures, suggesting that the deepening was a result of convective mixing in addition to local dynamic circulation accompanied with enhanced Rim Current flow (
Figure 3f). Stratification was established as air temperatures rose, and the uppermost 25 m layer warmed by the end of March. A newly formed CIW, located between 25 and 60 m, decreased to 50 m when the float changed its path to the interior basin in April. Apparently, the 8 °C isotherm rose from 14.75 σ
t to ~15 σ
t in the cyclonic interior part (
Figure 4g).
Argo floats 6903271 and 6903867 were in the eastern and western cyclonic interior, respectively.
Figure 4h,i show that the upper-mixed-layer temperatures were slightly cooler than 8 °C in the eastern basin during the cold-episode period depicted by the yellow frame. It should be noted that the eastern basin had a higher SST than the western gyre (
Figure 3a,c,e). Although the temperature of the mixed layer decreased remarkably—about 0.7 °C throughout two consecutive episodes—the temperatures in the uppermost 50 m decreased down to 7.9 °C (
Figure 4h,i) due to the high background temperatures in the eastern basin. The 8 °C temperature of the CIL definition was only met during the time interval between two episodes in the eastern basin.
Figure 3b,d,f reveal that the western gyre extended eastward, comprising various cyclonic structures at different scales. Float 6903867 drifted within this elongated western cyclonic gyre (
Figure 4a), following a cyclonic eddy pattern in the mid-latitudes. In February, temperatures in the quasi-homogeneous layer (~60 m) dipped slightly below 8 °C (
Figure 4j). The intensification of cyclonic circulation resulted in a pronounced “doming” of the isopycnal surfaces, as noted in many studies [
9,
16]. In other words, the upwelling of relatively dense deep waters reduced the static stability of the surface layer above the pycnocline. In the Western Black Sea, the Rim Current became more intense, starting with the first episode and gaining strength with the second episode (
Figure 3b,d,f). This intensification of the Rim Current led to noticeable “doming” and resulted in shoaling of density layers, reducing the pycnocline from ~48 m in early March to ~38 m (
Figure 5a). The second episode led to further cooling of the mixed layer to ~7.3 °C, which was the minimum temperature recorded on the western cyclonic gyre. The convective mixing eroded the upper pycnocline by allowing cold surface water to enter deeper isopycnal levels, as indicated by the steep gradient lines framed with a yellow box in
Figure 4k. By the subsequent seasonal surface warming, the thermocline was formed; meanwhile, the density at the lower boundary of the 8 °C isotherm decreased from 15.50 σ
t to ~15.25 σ
t (
Figure 4k). In April, the cold-water mass was confined between the seasonal thermocline and the permanent pycnocline and formed a thin CIW with a 20 m thickness (
Figure 4j,k). The temperature of this CIW increased in time due to mixing of the cold-water mass with the upper thermocline waters and outcropping of the pycnocline. A detailed analysis of the CIW formation in the cyclonic interior is provided in the following T-S diagram analysis in this section.
Argo float 7900595 drifted over the southeastern zone of the Rim Current (
Figure 4a). The temperature of the upper mixed layer, initially at 8.5 °C at the beginning of March, dipped slightly below 8 °C during the first cold episode and further decreased to 7.7 °C with the second episode later in March (
Figure 4l,m). The float followed the Rim Current as it meandered around the anticyclonic eddy in the southern periphery area between longitudes 37° and 39° (
Figure 3b,d). Because the weaker stability in the anticyclonic area allowed deeper ventilation [
14,
16], cooling extended up to ~75 m. After spring warming, the temperature rose and the thermocline formed, deepening to 60 m by the end of spring (
Figure 4l). The cold layer under the thermocline, between depths of 25 m and 50 m, warmed but remained under 8 °C at the end of April (
Figure 4l).
Figure 6 shows temperature–salinity (T-S) diagrams for the period corresponding to the two consecutive cold episodes. This period is indicated with a yellow frame in
Figure 4b–m. Please note that 12 out of 13 active Argo floats in the Black Sea are plotted (only float 6903782 is not, because it travelled from an anticyclone to a cyclone). The trajectories of these floats covering the analysis period are indicated in the
Supplementary Materials, Figure S1. Due to lower current speeds in the cyclonic interior, the floats drifted short distances and stayed relatively stationary inside gyres. Therefore, the time window could be made wider in the interior cyclonic area, covering the period from 1 March to 5 April 2022 (
Figure 6a–c). On the other hand, the time window was made narrower for the Rim Current and its periphery area, since the high current speeds associated with the Rim Current lead to significant drifting of floats. Moreover, other factors, such as dynamic features and mesoscale coastal eddies in the narrow band of the continental shelf, introduced complexity into the analysis. Consequently, a limited time window for evaluations was necessary to eliminate the influence of local dynamics at the new position of a float. Therefore, a shorter time window was selected, and two consecutive measurements were analyzed through the coldest period in these areas. The lowest temperatures observed between March 14 and 25 were analyzed (
Figure 6d).
Figure 6a–c show T-S diagrams in the cyclonic interior in the order of positions of the floats from west to east. All of the three floats (
Figure 6a–c) showed effective cooling after the first episode (on 12, 14, 15, and 17 March), as indicated in dark green. The measurements just after the second episode period (12–24 March) are shown in dark blue. It was observed that the eastward depth inclination of convection matched the background temperature profiles of the three subregions in the cyclonic interior. In fact, the temperature drop (in the upper mixed layer) during the two consecutive episodes was almost the same (~0.7 °C) in all the three float measurements in the cyclonic interior; this occurred independently of the measurement location. The salinity of the mixed layer gradually increased in the first episode and continued until the second episode. After the second episode, all three floats in the cyclonic interior showed a strong increase (>0.2 ppt) in mixed-layer salinities (
Figure 6a–c). The mixed-layer depth decreased gradually in the western gyre with the initiation of the first episode until the end of the second episode.
Figure 5a depicts the shoaling of the mixed-layer depth (from 47 m to 39 m on 14 March) with the first cold intrusion and its further reduction to 36 m with the second cold intrusion on 19 March. The increase in the mixed-layer salinity (~0.2 ppt) and its accompanying density can be explained by the weakening of the static stability at the pycnocline due to upwelling. As the intensity of circulation weakened after the second episode, the mixed layer deepened to 45 m on 24 March (
Figure 5a), the mixed-layer temperature decreased to its minimum, and its salinity continued to increase. Over 5 days, the salinity of the mixed layer increased by 0.08 ppt, while the temperature dropped by approximately 0.1 °C (
Figure 6a), indicating convective mixing. As surface heat loss made the water cooler and denser, it sunk into the deeper, more saline waters, leading to a corresponding increase in the salinity of the sinking water. Following the second episode, the salinity of the newly formed CIW increased by ~0.2 ppt in total compared to the beginning of March; this was accompanied by an increase in σ
t of about 0.25: from ~14.6 to ~14.85 (
Figure 6a).
Figure 5 presents the density profiles obtained from Argo floats drifting through three cyclonic structures within the Rim Current: the western, mid, and eastern zones centered at 34° E, 35° E, and 37° E, respectively. As explained in
Section 4.1 and illustrated in
Figure 3b,d,f, the sea level dropped due to the intensification of the Rim Current within the cyclonic interior during the cold episodes. The mixed-layer depth in the western cyclone shoaled over the cold episodes and then deepened afterward (
Figure 5a). In contrast, the mixed layers in the central and eastern cyclones remained stable at around 35 m throughout March (
Figure 5b,c). According to the discussion in
Section 4.1, the difference between the western gyre and the central and eastern gyres can be attributed to relatively weaker upwelling and less intense circulation in the latter through the cold episodes. Additionally, the increase in upper-mixed-layer salinity corresponded to the decrease in temperatures observed on 16 and 26 March (
Figure 6b) and on 12, 17, and 22 March (
Figure 6c).
Figure 6d shows T-S diagrams of the floats drifting along the Rim Current and its periphery by indicating the locations of the floats during 13–25 March as the northwestern, “NW_R”; southwestern, “SW_R”; southeastern, “SE-R”; eastern, “E_R”; and northeastern, “NE_R” part of the Rim Current and eastern periphery “E”. The measurements made just after the second intrusion, shown in dark blue, were saltier than the previous measurements for all floats. The northwestern part of the Rim Current was particularly notable for its ~0.3 ppt increase in salinity, ~0.25 increase in σ
t (15 σ
t), and additional temperature decrease of ~0.3 °C within a couple of days after the second episode. It was observed that the temperature increased gradually clockwise along the Rim Current and in the southwestern part of the Rim Current; the deepening occurred from 14.5 σ
t to 14.6 σ
t. In the southeastern part, it deepened from 14.70 σ
t to 14.80 σ
t (
Figure 6d). The greatest temperature drop was observed in the northeastern part of the Rim Current. Although cooling was strong, relatively high temperatures were noted in the upper water. This phenomenon resulted from the advection of warm waters from the eastern zone of the Rim Current, preventing convection to very deep waters [
14]. In other words, as the cooled-down surface water mixed with the warm water carried by the Rim Current flow, the CIW formation rates were reduced by local dynamics. Precisely the opposite situation was observed in the Western Black Sea, where the Rim Current (
Figure 6a) transported cold water originating from the northern shelves into a narrow band over the continental slope. The advection of the water column along the Rim Current preconditioned the penetration of surface cooling down to deep layers. No convection was observed in the northeastern periphery area.
4.3. Evaluation of CIL
All cycles of active Argo floats, covering 2022, as well as the two preceding warm years, are shown in
Figure 7. Cycles with a mean temperature of the water column below 8 °C are shown as blue circles; darker blue tones represent colder temperatures, while circle size indicates the thickness of the cold layer. Orange circles indicate water column temperatures between 8 °C and 8.5 °C, which are near the CIL boundary temperature definition.
A total of 21 Argo active floats provided a good areal distribution of measurements in a total of 1534 cycles throughout the warm years of 2020 and 2021 (
Figure 7a,b). In these years, only a few instances of a thin layer (<7 m) were recorded in February and March, with temperatures slightly cooler than 8 °C. The cooling events, however, were not sufficiently strong to create deep convection. Hence, the CIL detections were rare and limited to the northwestern continental slope and cyclonic gyres during this period. The annual mean SST distribution, which remained above 8 °C across the entire basin except for the western shelf area (
Supplementary Materials, Figure S4), strongly suggests that CIL formation was rare in the entire basin over these years. Therefore, by early 2022, there was no old CIL remaining from previous years. This situation provided a unique opportunity to directly observe the formation and spread of a new CIW mass.
In January 2022, surface heat loss intensified due to cooling events (
Figure 2c), but it was not strong enough to lower surface temperatures below 8 °C. However, a few Argo floats recorded temperatures below 8.5 °C in the eastern and southern Black Sea (
Figure 7c). In February, gradual cooling affected the entire basin, with temperatures increasing from west to east (
Figure 2e). During this period, the upper-mixed-layer temperatures fell slightly below 8 °C in the cyclonic interior and near the Bosporus area (
Figure 7d).
The most extensive, thickest, and coldest water formation occurred in March (
Figure 7e) and was driven by episodic cold intrusions discussed in
Section 3. It was widespread, excluding the northeastern part of the Rim Current and its peripheries. Argo floats in the Western Black Sea recorded CIL temperatures as low as ~7.3 °C, while floats in the eastern region registered warmer CIL temperatures, indicating an increase in CIL temperatures from west to east. No CIL was observed in the northeastern part of the Rim Current, while it was present in the northwestern section. The relatively warm waters advected from the eastern Rim Current could explain the absence of CIW in the northeastern Rim Current near the Kerch Strait.
Thicknesses of the CIL were lower in the cyclonic interior region compared to the periphery region because pronounced upwelling caused the denser deep isopycnal surfaces to become shallower (
Figure 4j,k and
Figure 5a). On the other hand, anticyclones, having weaker stability, allowed deeper ventilation, leading to thicker CIL formation. In March 2022, the deepest CIL formation was observed in the Sakarya anticyclone, close to the Bosphorus, with a depth of 100 m; in addition, several others were reported, with ~70 m along the Anatolian periphery and the NWS continental slope.
As the seasonal warming process began in April, a thermocline emerged in the upper 25–30 m. Therefore, the cold-water mass was squeezed between the seasonal thermocline and the permanent pycnocline (
Figure 7f). In May, the CIL observations persisted primarily in the cyclonic interior while the CIL temperatures rose slightly. The temperatures of the CIL along the western periphery exceeded 8 °C, except for the few thin-CIL observations (less than 10 m). While CIL formation was not observed on the Rim Current periphery from the Caucasus to the Crimea costal area in March, it appeared in April and persisted between May and June in the Caucasus periphery. The CIL observations later in summer suggested CIL formation based on advection along the Rim Current and its periphery. The advective CIL formations are frequently mentioned in previous studies [
12,
15,
33]. Examining the months after April, random distribution of the CIL can be attributed to isopycnal spreading inside the cyclonic interior due to mesoscale processes inside the cyclonic interior [
9,
12]. The temperatures continued to rise during the summer, with most of the float recording CIW temperatures exceeding 8 °C (
Figure 7g–j). Warming of the CIL was slower in the western cyclonic and coastal areas compared to the eastern part of a region; nevertheless, temperatures of the CIL increased gradually by ~0.5 °C until the end of the year.
It is worth noting that the western periphery area was rarely observed by Argo floats in 2022. The irregular thickness of the CIL between spring and summer was most probably related to the distance of the float from the anticyclonic eddy structures along the periphery of this region. CIL formation was observed only after April in the Caucasus and Kerch anticyclonic area. CIL observations in this region from late spring suggest isopycnal spreading, likely driven by advection from the Rim Current or onshore excursions from the eastern basin influenced by mesoscale features.
Using the warm CIL criterion (<8.35 °C) proposed by Capet et al. [
5] (shown in the
Supplementary Materials, Figure S2), only a few more weak cold-water formations were detected in the northwestern continental slope and cyclonic gyres during the winters of 2020 and 2021, with no detections occurring in the rest of the year.
Figure 8 shows the T-S distributions for the autumn months of the years 2020, 2021, and 2022. The slope of the T-S distribution curve at the base of the CIL (between σ
t = 16 and σ
t = 16.75) decreased from 2020 to 2021. A dramatic drop in the steepness of the T-S curve at the bottom of the CIL occurred in 2022. The curvature in the core of the T-S graphic increased, the mixing curve became non-linear, and the steepness of the mixing curve at σ
t = 15.5 changed substantially, indicating intensified diapycnal mixing at this depth.
The changes in CIL structure in autumn seasons (distant from the period of winter convection) between 2005 and 2019 were studied by Stanev, E.V., and Chtirkova, B. [
18]. They compared the slopes of the T-S distribution curves at the base of the CIL and showed a dramatic change in the slope in 2012. The study concluded that the slopes of the T-S curves below the core of the CIL decreased over the period that they analyzed, suggesting a diminished influence of temperature in these layers of the water column. The flattening trend in the slopes of the T-S curves at the same levels continued for the years 2020, 2021, and 2022, as shown in this study. The substantial change that occurred in 2021 persisted with intense mixing conditions in 2022 (
Figure 8). The distributions for the entire year are provided in the
Supplementary Materials (Figure S3).