3.1.2. Prediction and Analysis of Inundation Characteristics under the Scenario of RSLR Superimposed with the General Water Increase of Storm Surge
It can be seen from
Figure 8 that the obvious inundation areas of storm surge are Jiaojiang District, the eastern coast of Luqiao District and Yuhuan. The inundation range is large, and the inundation depth also reaches 4~5 m due to the existence of low-lying terrain. The coastal areas of Linhai City and Wenling also have obvious inundation areas, but the inundation depth is relatively small.
In the 12 RSLR scenarios in 2030, there is no obvious difference in the expansion effect of different RSLRs on the inundation range of the historical general storm surge. On the one hand, the RSLR value in 2030 is relatively small, and on the other hand, the basic water increase value of the historical general storm surge is low, so the expansion effect caused by the superposition of the two is limited. From the calculated inundation area, compared with the inundation area caused by general storm surge in history, except that the RSLR of the 2030 SOA-Low scenario only increased the inundation area by 1 km2 after superposing the storm surge, the other RSLR scenarios increased the inundation area by about 10 km2. From the result, the estimated inundation area of the storm surge under the 12 scenarios is relatively concentrated. According to the probability of the event, when the historical general storm surge occurs in 2030, the inundation area caused by it will increase by about 10 km2 compared with the current scenario. In a word, although the growth value of RSLR to 2030 is limited, and the expansion effect on the submerged area of storm surge is also limited, it still has a certain degree of impact.
It can be seen from
Figure 9 that under the 12 scenarios in 2050, the inundation range of the historical general storm surge does not change significantly compared with 2030, which is specifically shown in the southeast of Luqiao District. With the rise in relative sea level, seawater will further invade the inland areas with lower terrain based on the original inundation of the storm surge, and the new inundation area will have a relatively small inundation depth.
From the calculated inundation area, under the 12 scenarios in 2050, the inundation area of storm surge generally increased by more than 10 km2 compared with the current scenario, the largest increase was 14.19 km2 under the SSP5-8.5-High scenario and the lowest was still the SOA-Low scenario, with an increase of 9.49 km2. Compared with 2030, the RSLR value in 2050 has increased, and accordingly, the inundation range of storm surge has also been expanded to a certain extent. However, from the numerical point of view, the expanded inundation range is very small, which shows that the RSLR in 2050 has a limited capacity to expand the inundation range of the historical general storm surge. On the other hand, it also indicates that the elevation values of the non-flooded coastal areas in Taizhou are relatively high under various scenarios in 2030. In the scenario of a small increase in relative sea level, the threat of flooding is relatively small. However, the danger for low-lying coastal areas cannot be ignored, as compared to the current scenario, although the inundation range in this area has not changed much, the inundation depth may have increased by more than 0.5 m, with a total inundation depth of more than 5 m, reaching a level I hazard level, posing a high risk of casualties.
It can be observed that in the comprehensive scenario of RSLR in 2050, the contribution of land subsidence is greater than in 2030. The absolute sea level appreciation predicted by the three IPCC emission scenarios is not much different based on the division of the high, medium and low scenarios of land subsidence, while the SOA prediction value is only half of the IPCC prediction value. Comparing the submergence range of the four scenarios, it can be seen that the incremental difference between the three IPCC emission scenarios and the storm surge submergence range of SOA is not big, about 1~2 km2; that is, if land subsidence is not considered, the sea level rise predicted by SOA in 2050 will not have a significant impact on storm surge inundation. Due to the superposition of land subsidence and the scenario of the lowest and highest absolute sea level appreciation, the final inundation result is very close. Therefore, in 2050, land subsidence will make a greater contribution to the RSLR, and the expansion effect of storm surge inundation is also obvious.
Compared with 2030 and 2050, the RSLR in 2100 is very serious. Even the minimum estimated value approaches the maximum estimated value in 2050, while the maximum estimated value exceeds the historical general storm surge; that is, when only considering the threat of surge height, the threat of RSLR exceeds the historical general storm surge. In addition, unlike the RSLR scenarios in 2030 and 2050, the maximum RSLR scenario in 2100 is no longer the IPCC SSP5-8.5-High scenario but the SOA-High scenario, indicating that the speed of sea level rise in China’s waters is constantly increasing.
It can be seen from
Figure 10 that the inundation range under the scenario of RSLR superimposed with the general storm surge in 2100 has been significantly expanded. For example, in the southeast coastal area of Luqiao District, the inundation range of storm surge is larger, and the inundation depth has also increased. Another example is near the estuary of Sanmen County: although there is no large-scale inundation, a large number of small-scale inundation areas have been created.
In the 12 scenarios in 2100, except for the SSP1-2.6-Low and SSP2-4.5-Low scenarios, the inundation range increased by storm surge is small, and the inundation range is increased by more than 70 km2 in all other scenarios, with the maximum total inundation range reaching 340 km2, which is enough to cause major disasters. In a word, by 2100, the RSLR will itself cause disasters. If a storm surge occurs, it will raise the basic water level of the storm surge, and then superimpose storm surge to cause greater disasters.
3.1.3. Prediction and Analysis of Inundation Characteristics under the Scenario of RSLR Superimposed with Maximum Water Increase of Storm Surge
It is estimated that the minimum value of RSLR in 2030 is 0.07 m (SOA-Low scenario), which is the most optimistic prediction result but still slightly expands the area submerged by storm surge. The maximum RSLR is 0.2 m (SSP5-8.5-High), which is the worst-case scenario. Although the inundation area has only increased by about 1 km2 compared to no RSLR, once seawater invades land, the first victims are crops. Even if the crops on the plain are not completely submerged, they will be reduced to some extent. In addition, the soil affected by seawater intrusion will experience salinization. This damage will be long term and difficult to reverse. Residential land and vehicles parked in underground garages also exhibit high vulnerability to seawater intrusion. Once immersed in seawater, their structures and contents can cause significant losses.
From the perspective of IPCC Class I low-emission scenarios, the three RSLR values are 0.1 m, 0.15 m and 0.19 m, respectively. The difference between high and low scenarios is nearly 0.1 m, and the difference in inundation area is nearly 0.1 km
2. In
Figure 11, there is no obvious difference in inundation areas, but the increase in inundation depth is also worth paying attention to. The prediction values for the IPCC Class II medium-emission scenarios and the low-emission scenarios are the same, indicating that under the low- and medium-emission scenarios, this group of RSLR prediction results has high reliability. Therefore, the prediction values are relatively stable and can be used as a valuable reference for 2030 prediction results.
From the perspective of IPCC Class III high-emission scenarios, the RSLR values of the three scenarios are 0.11 m, 0.16 m and 0.2 m, respectively, which are slightly higher than the first two scenarios. The difference between the high and low scenarios is 0.9 m, and the difference between the submerged area and that of the first two scenarios is 0.25 km2. Although the RSLR values of the third scenario are only 0.01 m higher than the first two scenarios on the whole, the maximum storm surge submerged area that may increase is more than twice that of the first two scenarios. The prediction results under such high-emission scenarios can be used as a reference for the possible maximum submergence of storm surge.
Overall, the minimum prediction value of RSLR in 2030 is given by SOA, and the maximum prediction value is given by the high-emission scenario of IPCC. However, the prediction values of the two are relatively small due to the small period and the less significant comparison effect with the current scenario. However, it should be noted that the speed of RSLR itself is not slow, and due to the barrier effect of terrain elevation, the RSLR may significantly increase the expansion of the storm surge inundation area in the region after exceeding a critical elevation point. In addition, the increase in the inundation depth of storm surge caused by RSLR will continue, so the losses caused by inundation will also continue to increase.
By 2050, the minimum RSLR is expected to be 0.12 m (SOA-Low), the inundation area of storm surge is 532.78 km
2, the maximum RSLR is expected to be 0.52 m (SSP5-8.5-High) and the inundation area of storm surge is 555.28 km
2. From the perspective of RSLR, the maximum value is 0.4 m higher than the minimum value, and the inundation area of storm surge is increased by 2.5 km
2. As shown in
Figure 12, when the RSLR is high enough, the raised storm surge will go deep into the interior of the land along the inland river and submerge the land along the river, resulting in the invasion of inland freshwater by seawater and a poor living environment for residents on both sides of the river, and the impact of storm surge will further expand inland.
From the IPCC Class I low-emission scenarios, the three RSLR values are 0.21 m, 0.35 m and 0.48 m, respectively, with a difference of 0.27 m between the high and low scenarios and a difference of nearly 22 km2 between inundation areas. It can be seen that a difference in RSLR of only 0.27 m can lead to a significant increase in the inundation area of storm surges. Compared with 2030, when the possible maximum scenario of RSLR is 0.2 m, storm surge will only expand the inundation area by less than 2 km2, so it can be concluded that when the RSLR is about 0.5 m, its effect on the expansion of the inundation area of storm surge is very obvious.
From the IPCC Class II medium-emission scenarios, the three RSLR values are 0.23 m, 0.37 m and 0.5 m, respectively, with a difference of 0.27 m between the high and low scenarios and a difference of 22.12 km2 in inundation areas. This scenario is 0.02 m higher than the first low-emission scenario as a whole and 0.02 m lower than the third high-emission scenario. Under the corresponding scenarios of high, medium and low sedimentation in the three scenarios, the minimum inundation area difference is 0 (SSP1-2.6-Low and SSP2-4.5-Low scenarios), the maximum inundation area differs by 21.8 km2 (SSP2-4.5-Medium and SSP5-8.5-Medium scenarios), of which the RSLR prediction value in the SSP2-4.5-Medium scenario is 0.37 m, and the RSLR prediction value in the SSP5-8.5-Medium scenario is 0.39 m. Obviously, there is a terrain-critical point elevation between the two RSLR values. When the critical value is exceeded, storm surge can break through this barrier and quickly spread to produce a wider inundation range.
From the perspective of SOA scenarios, the three RSLR values are 0.12 m, 0.26 m and 0.39 m, respectively. The prediction values of this group are all smaller than the three scenarios of IPCC, and the maximum values are close to the medium-speed subsidence scenarios of the other three prediction scenarios. This may be because the rate of sea level rise in China is lower than the rate of Eustatic sea level rise in the short term, while the rate of subsidence in China is higher than the world average rate.
In general, the impact of RSLR on the inundation area of storm surge will become more and more obvious by 2050. If encountering special regions, the relative sea level may rise only 0.02 m, which will lead to the flood inundation of a 20 km2 scale storm surge. Therefore, it is self-evident that it is of great significance to control sea level rise and mitigate land subsidence. In consideration of the worst case, by 2050, the maximum RSLR will have exceeded 0.5 m, which will significantly increase the basic water level of storm surges. If the height of the protective seawalls is not increased, storm surge may easily cross the seawalls, causing impact disasters and deep inundation in coastal areas.
Overall, it can be seen that there is a significant difference in the inundation area among the three scenarios, as the magnitude of the inundation area is positively correlated with the magnitude of the water increase value. From the changing trend of inundation areas, it can be seen that the changing trend of inundation areas in the three scenarios is relatively gentle before 2050, while it is relatively large in 2100. This is because the RSLR is relatively small before 2050, and the superposition effect on storm surge is also relatively limited. By 2100, the RSLR is large, which can significantly increase the strength of storm surges, thus greatly increasing the inundation area.
From the observation and analysis of the inundation area under the RLSR scenario and the scenario of RLSR superimposed with the general water increase of storm surge, it can be seen that with the rise in relative sea level, the inundation area under the RLSR scenario increases, and is close to that under the scenario of RLSR superimposed with the general water increase of storm surge. There may be two reasons: Firstly, the general water increase value of storm surge is low, and the expansion effect of RSLR is not obvious. Secondly, due to the influence of terrain blocking, the inundation area will not increase significantly until the water increase value reaches a certain height. This can be seen from the inundation area under the scenario of RLSR superimposed with the maximum water increase of storm surge. Compared with the scenario in SSP1-2.6-Medium, the RSLR value is 0.36 m under the SSP1-2.6-High scenario, while the inundation area of the storm surge increases rapidly, increasing by 306.49 km2.
It is estimated that by 2100, the minimum value of RSLR will be 0.48 m (SSP1-2.6-Low), which is close to the extreme scenario of 2050; that is, if no precautions are taken, the extreme storm surge event under the 2050 scenario will occur by 2100, which is only the most ideal and conservative estimation result at the end of this century. The maximum value of RSLR is 1.57 m (SOA–high), which is 1.09 m higher than the conservative prediction value. In this scenario, even if there is no storm surge, the seawater will submerge part of the coastal lowlands. When a storm surge similar to the NO. 1909 “Lekima” intensity occurs, the inundation area will reach 866.19 km
2, which is 311.18 km
2 larger than the RSLR 0.48 m scenario, and 1.63 times the inundation area generated by the current storm surge. Please refer to
Figure 13 for details.
From the IPCC Class I low-emission scenario, the three RSLR values are 0.48 m, 0.85 m and 1.21 m, respectively. The difference between the high and low scenarios is 0.73 m, and the difference between inundation areas is 307.34 km2. From the inundation map, it can be seen that the expansion of the inundation areas is obvious. In addition to Wenling City, the inundation area of Luqiao District is also rapidly expanding, which has the largest and most direct impact on these two coastal cities.
From the IPCC Class II medium emission scenario, the three RSLR values are 0.6 m, 0.97 m and 1.33 m, respectively, with a difference of 0.73 m between the high and low scenarios and a difference of 307.04 km2 in inundation area. This scenario is similar to the IPCC high-emission scenario, where the inundation area caused by the medium- to high-speed sedimentation scenario is much larger than that caused by the low-speed sedimentation scenario.
From the perspective of SOA scenarios, the three RSLR values are 0.84 m, 1.21 m and 1.57 m, respectively. Contrary to 2030 and 2050, the SOA prediction value in 2100 is higher than the three types of predictions of IPCC, and even higher than the high-emission scenarios of IPCC. This may be due to the fact that the rate of regional sea level rise in China is lower than the global sea level rise rate in the short term, but the sustained rise in sea level in China’s waters over the long term leads to a sea level rise higher than the global average by the end of this century. At the same time, China’s land subsidence problem has attracted worldwide attention, with the amount and rate of subsidence ranking among the top values in the world. As a result, China’s RSLR situation is not optimistic.
In general, by 2100, the relative sea level has risen to a very threatening height. On the one hand, it will cause near-shore inundation. On the other hand, it can greatly increase the basic water level of storm surge, so that storm surge can easily cross the embankment facilities and have more destructive power. Not only coastal residents will be affected, but also inland and offshore residents will be at risk of being submerged by storm surge. In extreme cases, when the RSLR increases by 1.57 m, the inundation area of storm surge will expand by more than 300 km2, and the total inundation area is 1.62 times of the current scenario. From the perspective of inundation areas alone, this result is very serious. When the RSLR is 1.57 m, the inundation depth of storm surge increases to 1.5 times the original, which will not only greatly strengthen the losses caused by storm surge but also pose an unprecedented survival threat to coastal residents. Inland areas that have not been or are rarely affected by storm surge may also become severely affected areas at that time.