Performance Simulation of the Transportation Process Risk of Bauxite Carriers Based on the Markov Chain and Cloud Model
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
It is an interesting paper; however, the reader is getting lost in Section 2 and partially in Section 3. I think that you should 'help' the reader by providing some more explanatory comments on the development of the analysis.
Author Response
Firstly, thank reviewers for detailed and pertinent comments.
The revised version is updated in detail according to review comments, and other minor problems exposed in the paper are revised. For detailed revisions, please refer to the manuscript.
The answers to comments of reviewers are listed in order as the following forms.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The reviewer has significant problems to understand the concept and argumentation of the paper.
This paper is hard zu read and understand and needs editorial improvements.
Line / Remark
34: the statement is to generic
35: Not clear what contribution the Iron ore reference has
50: States of what?
67 unclear statement
132: Explaination needed
137: spatial transfer model? Please explain
139: Transfer mode and phases?
163: Complexity of channel: wind etc....
166: metaphase?
171: pls check grammar
178: The model needs a better explaination. Especially R
219: The reviewer has significant problems to understand the concept of C3E
248: The figure and and its empirical basis is unclear
274: Where these numbers are comming from (empirical basis?)
290 and 294: The figures need explaination
318: The contribution of this figure and its grounding is unclear
Author Response
Firstly, thank reviewers for detailed and pertinent comments.
The revised version is updated in detail according to review comments, and other minor problems exposed in the paper are revised. For detailed revisions, please refer to the manuscript.
The answers to comments of reviewers are listed in order as the following forms.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Dear Authors,
overall your paper is OK. The is a missing explanation what is “stage”. Please also check the figures and text in figures.
Regards,
Author Response
Firstly, thank reviewers for detailed and pertinent comments.
The revised version is updated in detail according to review comments, and other minor problems exposed in the paper are revised. For detailed revisions, please refer to the manuscript.
The answers to comments of reviewers are listed in order as the following forms.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
Thank you for the extentions
Author Response
Thanks again for comments. Please see the response and revised edition.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
