Next Article in Journal
Karl Barth, Memory, and the Nazi Past: Confronting the Question of German Guilt
Next Article in Special Issue
Identity Styles and Readiness to Enter into Interreligious Dialogue: The Moderating Function of Religiosity
Previous Article in Journal
Daoist Reflections on the See-Saw of Contingency and Autonomy: The Laozi and Zhuangzi in Dialogue with Sandel, Rosa, Rorty, Gray
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multidimensional Prayer Inventory: Psychometric Properties and Clinical Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Religions
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/rel13100973
religions-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Older Adults with Dementia: Association of Prayer with Neuropsychiatric Symptoms, Cognitive Function, and Sleep Disturbances

by
Katherine Carroll Britt
1,*,
Kathy C. Richards
2,
Gayle Acton
2,
Jill Hamilton
3 and
Kavita Radhakrishnan
2
1
School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
2
School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
3
Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Religions 2022, 13(10), 973; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13100973
Submission received: 21 September 2022 / Revised: 10 October 2022 / Accepted: 11 October 2022 / Published: 17 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prayer: A Psychological Perspective)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Protective factors that slow dementia progression and improve quality of life are needed. Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), cognitive decline, and sleep disturbances are commonly found in dementia, indicate progression, and increase caregiver distress. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of private prayer with NPS, cognitive function, and sleep disturbances in older adults with dementia. We analyzed data from the Health and Retirement Study in 2000, 2006, and 2008 and Aging, Demographics, and Memory Sub study in 2001–2003, 2006–2007, and 2008–2009 among 40 older adults (age 70–100 years, mean age = 84.67, 29 females and 11 males, 73.9% non-Hispanic White, and 19.2% Non-Hispanic Black, and 3% Hispanic, cognitive function = 1.169 indicating mild cognitive impairment) using correlational analysis. The results indicated that increased frequency of private prayer was significantly associated with lower NPS, better cognitive function, and lower sleep disturbances. In total, 100% of Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic participants reported praying at least once per week. Findings could be due to use of cognitive processes used in prayer during supplication, requesting aid, and through communication with the divine, reducing loneliness. Longitudinal studies including historically underrepresented populations are needed to examine these associations over time.

1. Introduction

Dementia is one of the costliest conditions to society and a public health priority (World Health Organization 2017). An increasingly prevalent terminal illness, dementia does not presently have a cure and it cannot be prevented. In 2015, the United States spent over $800 billion on dementia care and it is estimated that by 2050, 152 million people will have dementia worldwide (World Health Organization 2017). Alzheimer’s disease is the most common cause of dementia and can affect thinking, memory, independence, learning, speaking, understanding speech, and communication (Alzheimer’s Association 2021).
As the disease progresses, persons with dementia often rely on others for care and support of their needs. Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), cognitive decline, and sleep disturbances are commonly found in dementia and indicate disease progression (Okura et al. 2010; Santacruz Escudero et al. 2019). With symptoms such as aggression, apathy, wandering, anxiety, and depression, NPS in persons with dementia can be difficult to manage, prompt earlier institutionalization, and increase caregiver burden (Mehta et al. 2003; Scarmeas et al. 2005; Tsunoda et al. 2020). Declining cognitive function prompts increased reliance on caregivers for daily needs and activities. Manifestations of sleep disturbances include frequent nighttime awakenings and increased daytime napping which in turn may affect caregiver sleep as well. With increasing methods of early identification of individuals at greater risk of dementia through precision health and with the increasing dementia burden, identifying ways to slow disease progression is warranted, especially as up to 35% of risk factors are modifiable (Livingston et al. 2020).

1.1. Religious and Spiritual Practices

The utilization of religion and spirituality in times of uncertainty, stress, and illness is well documented (Balboni et al. 2022) and as adults age, religion and spirituality may become more important (Katsuno 2003; Tornstam 1996; Thunstrom and Noy 2022). Among older adults, religious and spiritual practices may play a protective role in cognitive decline as reported by a systematic review of several studies by Hosseini et al. (2019). Additionally, frequency of prayer in midlife is associated with lower risk of preclinical dementia, adjusting for age and education, among Arabic women (Inzelberg et al. 2013). However, few studies have examined religious and spiritual practices among persons with dementia (Britt et al. 2022a). For persons with Alzheimer’s disease, McGee et al. (2013) report negative religious coping is associated with fewer behavioral symptoms in persons with Alzheimer’s disease in the U.S. in a cross-sectional study (N = 28). These studies suggest religious and spiritual practices may be protective, but more studies are needed (Britt et al. 2022a), especially upon dementia progression to slow the dementia burden and to improve quality of life.

1.2. Theoretical Framework

This study was informed by the vulnerability-stress model incorporating religiosity/spirituality (VSM-RS) which served as a conceptual guide (Zwingmann et al. 2011) (see Figure 1). This VSM-RS framework displays a heuristic, linear model to project a pathway from a stressor to health incorporating factors of predispositions, health resources, and coping behaviors. Positing health outcomes are the result of a combination of these factors in response to a stressor, Zwingmann and colleagues (2011) suggest five dimensions of religiosity/spirituality along the linear path which include (1) centrality of religion/spirituality (i.e., religiosity, spirituality, religiousness), (2) religious and spiritual (R/S) resources, (3) religious coping, (4) spiritual needs, and (5) health outcomes using spiritual well-being. Based on established theories (i.e., diathesis-stress model, transactional theory of stress and coping), it posits individuals embrace religion and spirituality found in individual and environmental predispositions, coping behaviors, and resources in response to a stressor perceived to exceed a threshold (Ingram and Price 2001; Lazarus and Folkman 1984; Zuckerman 2009). Using the model as a guide, the present study concentrated on the concepts identified in the framework: (1) centrality of religion/spirituality conceptualized as private R/S activities (i.e., private prayer) and individual predispositions (e.g., race/ethnicity, gender), and (2) health outcomes, conceptualized as NPS, cognitive function, and sleep disturbances. The present study is strengthened by the model’s framework providing clear boundaries for religion, spirituality, and health dimensions and is based on R/S measures utilized in health research (Steinhauser and Balboni 2017).

1.3. The Present Study Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine associations between private prayer and NPS, cognitive function, and sleep disturbances among older adults with dementia.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Population

To examine these associations, we conducted a secondary analysis of publicly available data utilizing The Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and sub study, Aging, Demographics, and Memory study (ADAMS). The HRS consists of a nationally representative sample of adults aged 50 and above across the U.S. collecting data every two years beginning in 1992 to examine cognition, demographics, behavioral and social science factors and health. ADAMs is a sub study of the HRS sampling U.S. older adults aged 70 years and above every 1.5–2 years beginning in 2001, and was designed to examine health, risk factors, costs, and prevalence of dementia and cognitive impairment. A participant’s record was dropped if more than 5% of responses were missing from the record.

2.2. Procedures

For persons with all-cause dementia, data were examined for frequency of private prayer on NPS, cognitive function, and sleep disturbances. Data were used from the RAND HRS Longitudinal and Fat Files in 2000, 2006, and 2008, and in ADAMS waves 2001–2003, 2006–2007, and 2008–2009. Data were obtained from participants with all-cause dementia who completed the HRS survey for private prayer and covariates in HRS and in ADAMS for NPS, global cognition, and sleep disturbances.

2.3. Measures

In ADAMS, a dementia-trained nurse and neuropsychological technician conducted in-person assessments in the participant’s residential setting with presence of a familiar surrogate required. A neuropsychological test battery was conducted, a chronological history was taken (medical, psychiatric, cognitive function, family history, behavioral symptoms), as well as prior neuroimaging and laboratory test results collected from participants’ physicians (Langa et al. 2005). Final diagnosis was established by consensus panel of clinical experts (Gure et al. 2010) based on the DSM-III-R (American Psychiatric Association 1987) and DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association 1994). HRS weights were created for sampling of participants and nursing home status.
NPS measures used a structured caregiver interview using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), a widely accepted measure utilized in cognitive impairment to assess frequency, severity, and presence of behavioral and psychiatric expressions across 10 dimensions: aberrant motor behaviors, apathy, agitation/aggression, anxiety, delusions, depression, disinhibition, elation, hallucinations, and irritability (Cummings et al. 1994; Kaufer et al. 1998). An additional dimension was added in the ADAMs study, sleep disturbances. For NPI scoring, absence of a neuropsychiatric symptom was coded as 0; if the symptom was present, informants reported frequency by severity of symptoms with total scores calculated by multiplying symptom frequency and severity. A score of 4 or more was deemed clinically and meaningfully significant (Schneider et al. 2001). Scale validity and strong reliability have been reported in other studies (Ismail et al. 2016). Captured by three items with yes/no response, sleep disturbance scores were summed by these three items to create one total score composite with range from 0–3. Higher scores indicated higher degree of disturbed sleep collected across these three items: (1) (a) Do you have problems falling asleep? (b) Do you wake frequently? and (c) Do you have trouble waking too early? (Jelicic et al. 2002; Moon et al. 2017). To retain partial responses for sleep disturbance, responses across the 3 items marked “98” (don’t know) were marked as 0.
Cognition and functional performance were rated by the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) based on information provided by participants and the surrogate during evaluation (Hughes et al. 1982; Morris 1993). Scored across a 5-point scale quantifying severity of cognitive impairment with ranges: normal (0), very mild dementia (0.5), mild dementia (1), moderate dementia (2), and severe (3) (Gure et al. 2010; Morris 1993), this cognition score was created based on evaluation across six domains: memory, orientation, problem solving, community affairs, hobbies, and personal care.
Private spiritual practice was measured as frequency of private prayer. For HRS 2000, participants were asked, “Do you ever pray privately in places other than at church or synagogue?” A dichotomous response (yes/no) was recorded; for those answering “yes”, a follow up question was asked, “How often do you pray privately?” Five response scores range from less than once per month (0) to daily (5). For HRS 2006 and 2008, “How often do you pray privately in places other than at church or synagogue?” Five responses range from (1) more than once per day to (8) never in HRS 2006, and from (1) daily to (6) not in the last month in HRS 2008. Due to smaller sample size and response frequencies, responses were recoded into 3 categories across all data: none/not at all (0), less than once per week (1), and once per week or more (2). Selected based on workgroup recommendation for HRS (Levin 2003), this item for private prayer is widely applicable across the U.S. serving as a sensitive indicator of religious activity (Levin et al. 1994).
Demographics included age (years), sex (male = 0, female = 1), education (years), social contact (“frequency of getting together with people” range from (1) day to (6) almost never), and race/ethnicity (0 = non-Hispanic White, 1 = non-Hispanic Black, 2 = non-Hispanic Other, 3 = Hispanic).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were calculated for age, marital status, sex, education, social contact, race/ethnicity, living location (i.e., nursing home, community), religious preference, private prayer, and importance of religion. To examine the relationship between private prayer and NPS, cognitive function, and sleep disturbance, we calculated a bootstrapped Spearman’s Rho correlation using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 25). To account for the complex sampling design (stratification, clustering, nonresponse) of both the HRS and ADAMS, all analyses were weighted and adjusted (Heeringa et al. 2009).
Data were analyzed for missing data, errors, and presence of multicollinearity. Frequency distribution of all categorical variables and mean, standard deviation, and percentiles of all continuous variables were obtained.

3. Results

The sample included 40 older adults (74.9% females) aged 73–100 (M = 84.67, sd = 5.16) (see Table 1). Most were non-Hispanic White participants (73.9%), living in the community (93.2%), widowed (56.2%), Protestant (66.6%), and mean education was 9.84 years. The remaining participants identified as Catholic (32.2%) or other (1.2%) for religious preference. Participants reported religion as very important (69.5%) with 91% praying at least once or more per week. Around 30.2% reported almost never having any social contact, 30.1% having social contact every year, followed by 22.2% reporting daily social contact. Cognitive function was 1.169 (sd 0.516), indicating mild cognitive impairment, mean score of NPS 5.22 (sd 7.41) was identified as clinically significant, and mean sleep disturbances 0.79 (sd 1.078) were mild on 0–9 score.
Approximately 100% of non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic participants both reported praying at least once a week compared to 87.8% of non-Hispanic White participants (see Table 2).
Across sex differences, 89.1% of females reported praying daily compared to 96.4% males while 67.5% females compared to 75.6% males reported religion as very important (see Table 3).
Data did not meet the assumptions of regression analysis due to heteroscedasticity, nonnormal distribution, and nonlinearity as assessed with regression assumptions, therefore, a nonparametric correlation analysis was conducted using bootstrapped Spearman’s correlation for all 3 outcomes: NPS, CDR, and sleep disturbance.
Private prayer was significantly associated with NPS (rs (97) = −0.358, 95% CI [−0.363, −0.353], p < 0.01), cognitive function (rs (97) = −0.383, 95% CI [−0.388, −0.378], p < 0.01), and sleep disturbances (rs (97) = −0.147 95% CI [−0.153, −0.141], p < 0.01) (see Table 4).

4. Discussion

Our findings indicate increased frequency of private prayer was associated with lower NPS, better cognitive function, and lower sleep disturbances. These are similar to other previously reported research conducted in Italy among persons with mild and moderate Alzheimer’s disease (N = 64) suggesting higher religiosity (i.e., frequency of religious activity participation) and spirituality (i.e., defined as one’s personal attitude towards Christianity) are associated with slower cognitive and behavioral decline over 12 months (Coin et al. 2010). The type of prayer in the present study was not differentiated but in a recent qualitative study among caregivers and their loved ones with dementia, supplication prayer was utilized by dementia dyads to request aid for friends and loved ones experiencing illness or difficult life circumstances during social distancing; it was spoken of as a positive action an individual with limited functional ability can utilize to help others (Britt et al. 2022b). Among African American adults with history of life-threatening illness, prayer was used for requesting strength to endure, for healing, to give thanks, and ask for protection (Hamilton et al. 2019); their prayers helped them feel connected to God, to self, and to others, supporting their spirituality. Our studies’ findings of lower behavioral expressions, better cognitive function, and lower sleep disturbances could be due to the use of cognitive processes used in prayer to seek guidance for making decisions, to request aid when overwhelmed, in prompting positive psychological emotions such as hope, and by reducing loneliness through communication with the divine.
Though empirical evidence supporting positive effects of private prayer in health outcomes are limited, individuals may find hope in utilizing prayer, believing that it helps them (Masters and Spielmans 2007). According to Laird et al. (2004), there are five types of prayer an individual may utilize: adoration, confession, thanksgiving, supplication, and reception. Adoration prayer refers to praising and worshipping God without referencing needs or desires while confession prayer refers to admitting negative behavior and thought, seeking forgiveness (Laird et al. 2004). Thanksgiving prayer is expressing gratitude for positive life circumstances, supplication prayer refers to seeking intervention from God in personal life events or on behalf of others, and reception prayer is passively awaiting divine attainment of wisdom, guidance, and understanding (Laird et al. 2004). Adoration prayer is associated with meaning in life and optimism and negatively associated with depressive symptoms (Whittington and Scher 2010; Perez et al. 2011). It is a form of submission to a higher power and worship. Confession predicts poorer well-being, self-esteem, and optimism thus utilized when individuals acknowledge misdoings, shortcomings, requesting forgiveness (Laird et al. 2004; Whittington and Scher 2010) resulting in more positive psychological and physiological outcomes (Martinez-Pilkington 2007; Vitz and Mango 1997). A predictor of better wellbeing, self-esteem, optimism (Whittington and Scher 2010) and lower depression (Perez et al. 2011), thanksgiving prayer is utilized to express gratitude for perceived provisions and positive life circumstances. Supplication prayer is negatively associated with well-being and life satisfaction and represents requests or petition to God for help for self or others. Reception prayer represents contemplation—waiting for guidance or understanding from the divine. It is associated with better self-esteem, meaning in life, and optimism (Whittington and Scher 2010) and negatively associated with depressive symptoms (Perez et al. 2011). The current sample consists of a majority of Protestant (66.6%) and Catholic (32.2%) older participants in the U.S. possibly indicating a narrower, institutionalized-ritual interpretation of prayer. Though a diverse, cross-cultural phenomenon, broader concepts of prayer are utilized across the world including centering meditation as a contemplative practice (Dorais and Gutierrez 2021), deep breathing through prayer therapy (Sadeghimoghaddam et al. 2019), and music in prayer (Koen 2005).
Perhaps prayer provides some sense of control in debilitating illness. Persons with dementia may find peace in prayer practice, thus we see lower apathy, aggression, depression, and agitation. In another study among U.S. adults with acute coronary syndrome, 59.3% reported praying for their health with 85% reported finding strength and comfort in their spiritual practice (Abu et al. 2019). Among U.S. adults with cancer, prayer was negatively associated with depressive symptoms across many types of prayer: supplication, thanksgiving, adoration, and reception (Perez et al. 2011). In India, 90% of adult cancer patients (N = 300) reported prayer made them feel better and higher spiritual distress was also associated with higher pain scores (Bhatnagar et al. 2017). However, in a palliative care clinic in Brazil, individual prayer activity among adults with advanced cancer (N = 221) was not associated with quality of life (Paiva et al. 2014).
Utilizing religion and spirituality to cope may reduce stress and anxiety by providing resources such as beliefs, practices, and rituals, providing a greater sense of meaning and purpose in the midst of challenging life circumstances (Koenig 2012). Though the pathway between these is unclear, it appears religious and spiritual practices promote social interaction and support, increase positive psychological emotions, prompt cognitive stimulation, reduce stress and anxiety, and support healthy lifestyle behaviors (Chen et al. 2021; Koenig 2012). It is possible that psychological factors influence biological means through interactions with the central nervous system and immune systems (Kiecolt-Glaser et al. 2002). With prayer, those who are facing illness may practice petitioning, a form of supplication, requesting control of symptoms or to return to a healthy state (McCaffrey et al. 2004; Ross et al. 2008). For persons with dementia, a decline in independence and communication may prompt individuals to pray—an unlimited and nonpharmacological action that promotes hope and is associated with greater well-being, greater purpose in life, greater satisfaction, and optimism (Anderson and Nunnelley 2016; Laird et al. 2004; Olver and Dutney 2012; Tosta 2004). Thunstrom and Noy (2022) report individuals who positively value prayer believe prayer will give them comfort and support and will be answered by God to improve their health and wealth.
As 69.5% of our sample reported religion to be very important, persons diagnosed with dementia utilized spiritual practice as a coping activity. Similar research reports older adults are more religious than younger populations with religion and spirituality becoming more important with age (Bengtson et al. 2015; Pew Research Center 2018). Prayer is valued across faiths and cultures (Masters and Spielmans 2007) and can be used as a strategy to cope with adverse life circumstances. As seen in our findings, importance of religion and frequency of prayer was higher among historically underrepresented participants and males. Religion and spirituality are culturally salient factors among racial and ethnic minority communities reporting higher rates of religious and spiritual views and behaviors compared to White counterparts (Chatters et al. 2013). Socially marginalized populations report using religious and spiritual practices for psychological support and coping (Chatters et al. 2013). Around 62% of U.S. adults report utilizing some form of alternative medicine of which prayer for themselves (43%) and prayer for others (24.4%) were two of the most commonly reported alternative therapies to medical treatment (Barnes et al. 2002). McGee et al. (2013) in a cross-sectional study of adults with mild Alzheimer’s disease (N = 28), 90.4% practiced private prayer some or most days and 95.7% found relationship with the transcendent to be very important. These findings support the importance for spiritual activity and need for increased spiritual practice interventions created to support the spiritual activities of persons with dementia to continue cognitive exercise, improve well-being, and to provide hope and comfort through their disease trajectory.

5. Conclusions

A key component of successful aging, lifestyle factors such as religious and spiritual practices may reduce the risk of cognitive impairment and improve mental and physical health (Balboni et al. 2022; Coelho-Junior et al. 2022; Paillard-Borg et al. 2009) but more research is needed examining associations with dementia progression using a larger sample size. Most published studies have looked at prayer among adults with advanced illness and dementia caregivers but there is a large gap among persons with dementia. More studies are needed examining associations over time for religious and spiritual practices among diverse populations. Clinical trials should be created and designed around personal preferences and cultural sensitivity for persons with dementia upholding dignity and supporting person-centered care.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.C.B.; methodology, K.C.B. and K.R.; formal analysis, K.C.B.; writing—original draft preparation, K.C.B.; writing—review and editing, K.C.B., K.C.R., G.A., J.H., and K.R.; supervision, K.R.; project administration, K.C.B.; funding acquisition, K.C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Article Processing Charge was funded by the first author. Author K.C.B. is supported by Jonas Philanthropy as a Mental Health/Psychology Jonas Scholar and a T32 Postdoctoral Research Fellowship from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Nursing Research (5T32-NR009356-14). The Health and Retirement Study was funded by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging (U01AG009740) and the Social Security Administration. The Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study was also supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging (U01AG009740).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The University of Texas at Austin granted the current study exempt status due to utilization of publicly available, de-identified data.

Informed Consent Statement

All participants provided written informed consent to participate in the Health and Retirement Study and Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study.

Data Availability Statement

The data utilized in this study are publicly available at https://hrs.isr.umich.edu (accessed on 2 November 2021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abu, Hawa O., David D. McManus, Darleen M. Lessard, Catarina I. Kiefe, and Robert J. Goldberg. 2019. Religious practices and changes in health-related quality of life after hospital discharge for an acute coronary syndrome. Health Quality of Life Outcomes 17: 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Alzheimer’s Association. 2021. Facts and Figures. Available online: https://www.alz.org/alzheimers-dementia/facts-figures (accessed on 15 November 2021).
  3. American Psychiatric Association. 1987. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed. revised. Virginia: American Psychiatric Association. [Google Scholar]
  4. American Psychiatric Association. 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Virginia: American Psychiatric Association. [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson, James W., and Paige A. Nunnelley. 2016. Private prayer associations with depression, anxiety and other health conditions: An analytical review of clinical studies. Postgraduate Medicine 128: 635–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Balboni, Tracy A., Tyler J. Vander Weele, Stephanie D. Doan-Soares, Katelyn N. G. Long, Betty R. Ferrell, George Fitchett, Harold G. Koenig, Paul A. Bain, Christina Puchalski, Karen E. Steinhauser, and et al. 2022. Spirituality in serious illness and health. JAMA 328: 184–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Barnes, Patricia M., Eve Powell-Griner, Kim McFann, and Richard L. Nahin. 2002. Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use among Adults: United States, 2002. Washington, DC: National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bengtson, Vern L., Merril Silverstein, Norella M. Putney, and Susan C. Harris. 2015. Does religiousness increase with age? Age changes and generational differences over 35 years. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 54: 363–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bhatnagar, Sushma, Joris Gielen, Aanchal Satija, Suraj Pal Singh, Simon Noble, and Santosh K. Chaturvedi. 2017. Signs of spiritual distress and its implications for practice in Indian palliative care. Indian Journal of Palliative Care 23: 306–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Britt, Katherine Carroll, Jung Kwak, Gayle Acton, Kathy C. Richards, Jill Hamilton, and Kavita Radhakrishnan. 2022a. Measures of religion and spirituality in dementia: An integrative review. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions 8: e12352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Britt, Katherine Carroll, Kathy C. Richards, Kavita Radhakrishnan, Andrea Vanags-Louredo, Eunice Park, Nalaaka Gooneratne, and Liam Fry. 2022b. Religion, spirituality, and coping during the pandemic: Perspectives of dementia caregivers. Clinical Nursing Research. online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chatters, Linda M., Ann W. Nguyen, and Robert Joseph Taylor. 2013. Religion and spirituality among older African Americans, Asians, and Hispanics. In Handbook of Minority Aging. Edited by Keith E. Whitfield and Tamara A. Baker. New York: Springer, pp. 47–64. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, Ying, Eric S. Kim, and Tyler J. VanderWeele. 2021. Religious-service attendance and subsequent health and well-being throughout adulthood: Evidence from three prospective cohorts. International Journal of Epidemiology 49: 2030–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Coelho-Junior, Helio Jose, Riccardo Calvani, Francesco Panza, Riccardo F. Allegri, Anna Picca, Emanuele Marzetti, and Vicente Paulo Alves. 2022. Religiosity/Spirituality and mental health in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Frontiers in Medicine 9: 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Coin, Alessandra, Egle Perissinotto, Marvin Najjar, Agostino Girardi, Ernine Metal Inelmen, Giuliano Enzi, Enzo Manzato, and Giuseppe Sergi. 2010. Does religiosity protect against cognitive and behavioral decline in Alzheimer’s dementia? Curent Alzheimer’s Research 7: 445–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cummings, Jeffrey L., Michael Mega, Katherine Gray, Susan Rosenberg-Thompson, Daniela Anne Carusi, and Jeffrey Gornbein. 1994. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: Comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology 44: 2308–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Dorais, Stepahnie, and Daniel Gutierrez. 2021. The influence of spiritual transcendence on a centering meditation: A growth curve analysis of resilience. Religions 12: 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gure, Tanya Ruff, Mohammed U. Kabeto, Brenda L. Plassman, John D. Piette, and Kenneth M. Langa. 2010. Differences in functional impairment across subtypes of dementia. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 65: 434–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Hamilton, Jill B., Leslie Kweon, La-Urshalar B. Brock, and Angelo D. Moore. 2019. The use of prayer during life-threatening illness: A connectedness to God, inner-self, and others. Journal of Religion and Health 59: 1687–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Heeringa, Steven G., Gwenith G. Fisher, Michael Hurd, Kenneth M. Langa, Mary Beth Ofstedal, Brenda L. Plassman, Williard L. Rodgers, and David R. Weir. 2009. Aging, Demographics and Memory Study (ADAMS): Sample Design, Weighting and Analysis for ADAMS. Available online: https://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/userg/ADAMSSampleWeights_Jun2009.pdf (accessed on 2 November 2021).
  21. Hosseini, Shera, Ashok Chaurasia, and Mark Oremus. 2019. The effect of religion and spirituality on cognitive function: A systematic review. Gerontologist 59: e76–e85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hughes, Charles P., Leonard Berg, Warren Danziger, Lawrence A. Coben, and Ronald L. Martin. 1982. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry 140: 566–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ingram, Rick E., and Joseph M. Price. 2001. Vulnerability to Psychopathology: Risk Across the Lifespan. New York: The Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
  24. Inzelberg, Rivka, Anne E. Afgin, Magda Massarwa, Edna Schechtman, Simon D. Israeli-Korn, Rosa Strugatsky, Amin Abuful, Efrat Kravitz, Lindsay A. Farrer, and Robert P. Friedland. 2013. Prayer at midlife is associated with reduced risk of cognitive decline in Arabic women. Current Alzheimer Research 10: 340–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ismail, Zahinoor, Eric E. Smith, Yonas Geda, David Sultzer, Henry Brodaty, Gwenn Smith, Luis Agüera-Ortiz, Rob Sweet, David Miller, and Constantine G. Lyketsos. 2016. Neuropsychiatric symptoms as early manifestations of emergent dementia: Provisional diagnostic criteria for mild behavioral impairment. Alzheimer’s Dementia 12: 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jelicic, Marko, Hans Bosma, Rudolf W. H. M. Ponds, Martin P. J. Van Boxtel, Peter J. Houx, and Jelle Jolles. 2002. Connections between sleep and cognition in older adults. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 17: 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Katsuno, Towako. 2003. Personal spirituality of persons with early-stage dementia: Is it related to perceived quality of life? Dementia 2: 315–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaufer, Daniel I., Jeffrey L. Cummings, Dianne Christine, Tim Bray, Steve Castellon, Donna Masterman, Audrey MacMillan, Patrick Ketchel, and Steven T. DeKosky. 1998. Assessing the impact of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease: The Neuropsychiatric Inventory Caregiver Distress Scale. Journal of American Geriatric Society 46: 210–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kiecolt-Glaser, Janice K., Lynanne McGuire, Theodore F. Robles, and Ronald Glaser. 2002. Emotions, morbidity, and mortality: New perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology. Annual Review of Psychology 53: 83–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Koen, Benjamin D. 2005. Medical ethnomusicology in the Pamir Mountains: Music and prayer in healing. Ethnomusicology 49: 287–311. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20174379 (accessed on 2 August 2022).
  31. Koenig, Harold G. 2012. Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. ISRN Psychiatry 2012: 278730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Laird, Steven P., Charles. R. Snyder, Michael A. Rapoff, and Sam Green. 2004. Measuring private prayer: Development, validation, and clinical application of the multidimensional prayer Inventory. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 14: 251–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Langa, Kenneth M., Brenda L. Plassman, Robert B. Wallace, A. Regula Herzog, Steven G. Heeringa, Mary Beth Ofstedal, James R. Burke, Gwenith G. Fisher, Nancy H. Fultz, Michael D. Hurd, and et al. 2005. The Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study: Study design and methods. Neuroepidemiology 25: 181–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lazarus, Richard S., and Susan Folkman. 1984. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  35. Levin, Jeffrey S. 2003. Private religious practices. In Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for Use in Health Research: A Report of the Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group, 2nd ed. Edited by NIA Working Group. Kalamazoo: John E. Fetzer Institute, pp. 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  36. Levin, Jeffrey S., Robert Joseph Taylor, and Linda M. Chatters. 1994. Race and gender differences in religiosity among older adults: Findings from four national surveys. Journal of Gerontology 49: S137–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Livingston, Gill, Jonathan Huntley, Andrew Sommerlad, David Ames, Clive Ballard, Sube Banerjee, Carol Brayne, Alistair Burns, Jiska Cohen-Mansfield, Claudia Cooper, and et al. 2020. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet 396: 413–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Martinez-Pilkington, Amber. 2007. Shame and guilt: The psychology of sacramental confession. The Humanistic Psychologist 35: 203–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Masters, Kevin S., and Glen I. Spielmans. 2007. Prayer and health: Review, meta-analysis, and research agenda. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 30: 329–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. McCaffrey, Anne M., David M. Eisenberg, Anna T. R. Legedza, Roger B. Davis, and Russell S. Phillips. 2004. Prayer for health concerns: Results of a national survey on prevalence and patterns of use. Archives of Internal Medicine 164: 858–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. McGee, Jocelyn Shealy, Dennis R. Myers, Holly Carlson, Angela Pool Funai, and Paul A. Barclay. 2013. Spirituality, faith, and mild Alzheimer’s disease. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion 24: 221–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mehta, Kala M., Kristine Yaffe, Kenneth M. Langa, Laura Sands, Mary A. Whooley, and Kenneth E. Covinsky. 2003. Additive effects of cognitive function and depressive symptoms on mortality in elderly community-living adults. Journal of Gerontology Series A: Biological Science and Medical Sciences 58: M461–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Moon, Chooza, Ju Young Yoon, and Lisa C. Bratzke. 2017. The role of heart failure, daytime sleepiness, and disturbed sleep on cognition. Western Journal of Nursing Research 39: 473–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Morris, John C. 1993. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules. Neurology 43: 2412–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Okura, Toru, Brenda L. Plassman, David C. Steffens, David J. Llewellyn, Guy G. Potter, and Kenneth M. Langa. 2010. Prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms and their association with functional limitations in older adults in the United States: The Aging, Demographics, And Memory Study. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 58: 330–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Olver, Ian N., and Andrew Dutney. 2012. A randomized, blinded study of the impact of intercessory prayer on spiritual well-being in patients with cancer. Alternative Therapies 18: 18–27. [Google Scholar]
  47. Paillard-Borg, Stephanie, Laura Fratiglioni, Bengt Winblad, and Hui-Xin Wang. 2009. Leisure activities in late life in relation to dementia risk: Principal component analysis. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders 28: 136–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Paiva, Carlos Eduardo, Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro Paiva, Sriram Yennurajalingam, and David Hui. 2014. The impact of religiosity and individual prayer activities on advanced cancer patients’ health: Is there any difference in function of whether or not receiving palliative anti-neoplastic therapy? Journal of Religion and Health 53: 1717–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Perez, John E., Amy Rex Smith, Rebecca L. Norris, Katia M. Canenguez, Elizabeth F. Tracey, and Susan B. Decristofaro. 2011. Types of prayer and depressive symptoms among cancer pts: The mediating role of rumination and social support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 34: 519–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Pew Research Center. 2018. The Age Gap in Religion around the World, June 13. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2018/06/13/the-age-gap-in-religion-around-the-world/ (accessed on 15 January 2022).
  51. Ross, Louie E., Ingrid J. Hall, Temeika L. Fairley, Thenneko J. Taylor, and Daniel L. Howard. 2008. Prayer and self-reported health among cancer survivors in the United States, National Health Interview Survey, 2002. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 14: 931–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Sadeghimoghaddam, Soudabeh, Mousa Alavi, Tayebeh Mehrabi, and AmirHosein Bankpoor-Fard. 2019. The effect of two methods of relaxation and prayer therapy on anxiety and hope in patients with coronary artery disease: A quasi-experimental study. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research 24: 102–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Santacruz Escudero, Jose Manuel, Jonathan Beltrán, Alvaro Palacios, Claudia Marcela Chimbí, Diana Matallana, Pablo Reyes, Victor Perez-Sola, and Hernando Santamaría-García. 2019. Neuropsychiatric symptoms as predictors of clinical course in neurodegeneration. A Longitudinal Study. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 11: 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Scarmeas, Nikolaos, Jason Brandt, Marilyn Albert, Georgios Hadjigeorgiou, Alexandros Papadimitriou, Bruno Dubois, Maria Sarazin, Davangere Devanand, Lawrence Honig, Karen Marder, and et al. 2005. Delusions and hallucinations are associated with worse outcome in Alzheimer disease. Archives of Neurology 62: 1601–08. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Schneider, Lon S., Pierre N. Tariot, Constantine G. Lyketsos, Karen S. Dagerman, Kenneth L. Davis, Sonia Davis, John K. Hsiao, Dilip V. Jeste, Ira R. Katz, Jason T. Olin, and et al. 2001. National Institute of Mental Health Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE): Alzheimer disease trial methodology. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 9: 346–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Steinhauser, Karen E., and Tracy A. Balboni. 2017. State of the Science of Spirituality and Palliative Care Research: Research Landscape and Future Directions. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 54: 426–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Thunstrom, Linda, and Shiri Noy. 2022. What we think prayers do: Americans’ expectations and valuation of intercessory prayer. PLoS ONE 17: e0265836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tornstam, Lars. 1996. Caring for the elderly: Introducing the theory of gerotranscendence as a supplementary frame of reference for caring for the elderly. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 10: 144–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tosta, Carlos Eduardo. 2004. Does prayer heal? Brasília Médica 34: 38–45. [Google Scholar]
  60. Tsunoda, Keiichiro, Toru Yamashita, Yosuke Osakada, Ryo Sasaki, Koh Tadokoro, Namiko Matsumoto, Emi Nomura, Ryuta Morihara, Yumiko Nakano, Yoshiaki Takahashi, and et al. 2020. Early emergence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in cognitively normal subjects and mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Alzheimers Disease 73: 209–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vitz, Paul C., and Philip Mango. 1997. Kernbergian psychodynamics and religious aspects of the forgiveness process. Journal of Psychology and Theology 25: 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Whittington, Brandon L., and Steven J. Scher. 2010. Prayer and subjective well-being: An examination of six different types of prayer. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 20: 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. World Health Organization. 2017. Infographic on Dementia. Available online: https://doi.org/https://www.who.int/mental_health/neurology/dementia/infographic_dementia/en/ (accessed on 15 January 2022).
  64. Zuckerman, Marvin. 2009. Vulnerability to Psychopathology: A Biosocial Model, 1st ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zwingmann, Christian, Constatin Klein, and Arndt Büssing. 2011. Measuring religiosity/spirituality: Theoretical differentiations and categorization of instruments. Religions 2: 345–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Religions 13 00973 g001 550
Figure 1. The Vulnerability-Stress Model incorporating Religiosity/Spirituality (VSM-RS) which includes (1) centrality of religion, (2) R/S resources, (3) spiritual needs, (4) religious coping, and (5) spiritual well-being.
Figure 1. The Vulnerability-Stress Model incorporating Religiosity/Spirituality (VSM-RS) which includes (1) centrality of religion, (2) R/S resources, (3) spiritual needs, (4) religious coping, and (5) spiritual well-being.
Religions 13 00973 g001
Table
Table 1. Description of Dementia Participants (N = 40).
Table 1. Description of Dementia Participants (N = 40).
DemographicsMean (SD),
Range
Age84.67 (5.159),
73–100
Education9.84 (4.027),
0–16
Income20,602.00 (18,440.31),
5280–97,020
Cognitive Rating1.169 (0.5164),
0.5–3.0
NPS scores5.22 (7.413),
0–35
Sleep Disturbance 0.79 (1.078),
0–3
Unweighted Count (N = 40) * (%)
Race/Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic White26 (73.9)
Non-Hispanic Black11 (19.2)
Non-Hispanic Other0 (0)
Hispanic3 (6.9)
Gender
Females29 (74.9)
Males11 (25.1)
Proxy
Yes1 (0.7)
No39 (99.3)
Living Arrangements
Community38 (93.2)
Nursing Home3 (6.8)
Marital Status
Single0 (0)
Married, partnered14 (38.7)
Divorced, separated3 (5.1)
Widowed23 (56.2)
Religious Preference
Protestant27 (66.6)
Catholic12 (32.2)
Jewish0 (0)
None/no preference0 (0)
Other1 (1.2)
Importance of Religion
Not too important2 (6.8)
Somewhat important9 (23.6)
Very important29 (69.5)
Private Prayer
Never or not in the last month3 (9)
At least once a month0 (0)
At least once a week33 (91)
Frequency Social Contact
Almost never12 (30.2)
Year13 (30.1)
Month1 (2.8)
Every 2 weeks5 (12)
Week1 (2.8)
Day8 (22.2)
Note. * Table contains raw counts and survey-weighted: means, standard deviations, median, ranges, and percentages; therefore, percentages may not sum to 100. Cognitive Rating: higher number indicates more impairment. NPS = neuropsychiatric symptoms; CDR = clinical dementia rating; SD = standard deviation.
Table
Table 2. Frequencies across race/ethnicity.
Table 2. Frequencies across race/ethnicity.
VariablesIn Dementia (N = 40)
Non-Hispanic WhiteNon-Hispanic BlackNon-Hispanic OtherHispanic
N ^
(%)		N ^
(%)		N ^
(%)		N ^
(%)
Importance of Religion
Not too important2
(9.3)		000
Somewhat important9
(31.9)		000
Very important15
(58.8)		11
(100)		03
(100)
Frequency of Private Prayer
Less than once a month3
(12.2)		000
At least once a month0000
At least once a week23
(87.8)		11
(100)		03
(100)
Mean
(SD)		Mean
(SD)		Mean
(SD)		Mean
(SD)
NPS5.24
(8.655)		4.21
(9.632)		00.67
(0.469)
Cognitive Rating1.232
(0.5735)		0.955
(0.301)		01.00
(0.000)
Sleep Disturbance0.66
(0.962)		0.75
(0.935)		01.43
(1.285)
Notes. ^ Table contains raw counts and survey-weighted: means, standard deviations, median, ranges, and percentages; therefore, percentages may not sum to 100. Cognitive Rating: higher number indicates more impairment.
Table
Table 3. Frequencies of Females and Males.
Table 3. Frequencies of Females and Males.
VariablesIn Dementia
(N = 40)
FemalesMales
N ^
(%)		Mean
(SD)		N ^
(%)		Mean
(SD)
Importance of Religion
Not too important1
(5)		 1
(12.4)
Somewhat important7
(27.5)		 2
(12.1)
Very important21
(67.5)		 8
(75.6)
Frequency of Private Prayer
Less than once a month2
(10.8)		 1
(3.6)
At least once a month0 0
At least once a week27
(89.1)		 10
(96.4)
NPS 5.66
(10.08)		 3.44
(5.260)
Cognitive Rating 1.246
(0.5548)		 1.029
(0.455)
Sleep Disturbance 0.82
(1.104)		 0.50
(0.660)
Notes. ^ Table contains raw counts and survey-weighted: means, standard deviations, median, ranges, and percentages; therefore, percentages may not sum to 100. Cognitive Rating: higher number indicates more impairment. SD = standard deviations; NPS = neuropsychiatric symptoms.
Table
Table 4. Bootstrapped Spearman’s Rho Correlation Analysis Results.
Table 4. Bootstrapped Spearman’s Rho Correlation Analysis Results.
VariableNPSCognitive RatingSleep Disturbance
r
(CI)		r
(CI)		r
(CI)
Private Prayer−0.358
(−0.363, −0.353) *		−0.383
(−0.388, −0.378) *		−0.147
(−0.153, −0.141) *
Note. Cognitive Rating: higher number indicates more impairment. r = correlation; CI = Confidence Interval; NPS = neuropsychiatric symptoms; CDR = clinical dementia rating. * p < 0.01.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Britt, K.C.; Richards, K.C.; Acton, G.; Hamilton, J.; Radhakrishnan, K. Older Adults with Dementia: Association of Prayer with Neuropsychiatric Symptoms, Cognitive Function, and Sleep Disturbances. Religions 2022, 13, 973. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13100973

AMA Style

Britt KC, Richards KC, Acton G, Hamilton J, Radhakrishnan K. Older Adults with Dementia: Association of Prayer with Neuropsychiatric Symptoms, Cognitive Function, and Sleep Disturbances. Religions. 2022; 13(10):973. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13100973

Chicago/Turabian Style

Britt, Katherine Carroll, Kathy C. Richards, Gayle Acton, Jill Hamilton, and Kavita Radhakrishnan. 2022. "Older Adults with Dementia: Association of Prayer with Neuropsychiatric Symptoms, Cognitive Function, and Sleep Disturbances" Religions 13, no. 10: 973. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13100973

APA Style

Britt, K. C., Richards, K. C., Acton, G., Hamilton, J., & Radhakrishnan, K. (2022). Older Adults with Dementia: Association of Prayer with Neuropsychiatric Symptoms, Cognitive Function, and Sleep Disturbances. Religions, 13(10), 973. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13100973

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop