1. Introduction
As one of China’s famous philosophical classics and the sacred book of Daoism, the
Dào Dé Jīng crystallizes the ancient wisdom and civilization of China. For centuries, the translation of the
Dào Dé Jīng has attracted the attention of scholars at home and abroad and helped the world know China better. According to Daoxuan’s
Collection of Critical Evaluations of Buddhism and Daoism from the Past and Present (
jí gǔ jīn fó dào lùn héng 集古今佛道论衡), the
Dào Dé Jīng was first translated into Sanskrit by Xuanzang and Taoist priests under the official organization in the twenty-first year of Zhenguan in the Tang Dynasty (AD 647) (
Liu 2018, p. 234). Later the
Dào Dé Jīng was translated into Latin, French, German, Japanese, English, and other languages. According to Prof. Misha Tadd, the number of translated versions of the
Dào Dé Jīng has reached 2000, involving 94 languages (
Tadd 2022, p. 88). Second only to the Bible, the
Dào Dé Jīng is the most translated classic with worldwide influence.
In 1823, French sinologist Jean-Pierre Abel-Rémusat published his
Mémoire sur la vie et les opinions de Lao-Tseu (Memory of the Life and Opinions of Laozi), in which he translated five chapters of
Dào Dé Jīng and elaborated the concept of
Dào. In 1827, based on French sinologist Abel Rémusat’s French translation, the German philosopher Carl Jos. Hieron Windischmann translated five chapters of the
Dào Dé Jīng into German
1. Since then, the translation of the
Dào Dé Jīng in the German-speaking regions began. The past two centuries witnessed the increase of German translations of the
Dào Dé Jīng from none to over 150. The number of German versions of the
Dào Dé Jīng is second only to that of the English ones. Among these German versions of the
Dào Dé Jīng, excellent translations by Victor von Strauss, Richard Wilhelm, Günther Debon, and so on are widely recognized and quite influential. Meanwhile, the German philosophical circle always pays close attention to Laozi and his work. From Immanuel Kant’s strong criticism of Laozi’s thinking to the critical acceptance of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling, Martin Buber, and so on to Laozi’s ideas, to Martin Heidegger and Karl Theodor Jaspers’ appreciation and recommendation of Laozi, Laozi and his
Dào Dé Jīng gradually came to the fore in the German philosophical circle (
Elberfeld 2000). Likewise, the
Dào Dé Jīng inspired many writers in German-speaking regions. Laozi’s thinking and ideas can be seen in Alfred Döblin’s 1915
Die drei Sprünge des Wang-lun (
The Three Leaps of Wang Lun) which sets the story in late eighteenth-century China, Bertolt Brecht’s poetry 1924
Morgendliche Rede an den Baum “Griehn” (
Morning address to a tree named “Green”) and 1953
Eisen (
Iron) and his dramas 1941
Mutter Courage und ihre Kinder (
Mother Courage and Her Children), 1943
Der gute Mensch von Sezuan (
The Good Person of Szechwan), Hermann Hesse’s 1919
Demian: Die Geschichte von Emil Sinclairs Jugend (
Demian: The Story of a Youth), 1922
Siddharta: Eine indische Dichtung (
Siddhartha: An Indian Tale), and 1932
Die Morgenlandfahrt: Eine Erzählung (
The Journey to the East). Since the 1990s, the promotion of the
Dào Dé Jīng to the world accelerates with more translations, diversified media, as well as more readers and audiences. The
Dào Dé Jīng and the philosophical thinking in the book become popular among modern readers, manifesting their vitality in the contemporary world.
Though the
Dào Dé Jīng is only a book of almost 5000 Chinese letters, it is a book of the world. The
Dào Dé Jīng covers many fields, such as self-cultivation, state governance, military strategy and tactics, epistemology, cosmology, world and natural outlook, and so on. Meanwhile, the
Dào Dé Jīng is obscure and hard to read, even for native readers. Without annotations, even Chinese readers cannot interpret the book correctly. However, why did the
Dào Dé Jīng maintain high popularity in the German world for over a century? This article aims to find the answer from the analysis of the translation of
Xiàng (Symbolic Imagery)
2 in the German versions of the
Dào Dé Jīng from the perspective of the conceptual metaphor field. Meanwhile, this article attempts to summarize the techniques used in the translation of the
Dào Dé Jīng and lay the foundation for the translation of other Chinese classics which bridge the communication between Chinese civilization and other civilization.
2. Xiàng as the Source Domain and the Conceptual Metaphor Field of Dào
Laozi said “The way that can be spoken of is not the constant way”
3 (
Laozi 1963, D. C. Lau, trans., p. 5). From the perspective of semantics,
Dào is an extremely abstract concept that cannot be explained in words. From Wang Bi’s explanation that “Semantically speaking,
Xiàng shares the closest meaning with
Dao” (
jìn yì mò ruò xiàng 尽意莫若象), people could find that Laozi sought to make an analogy between
Xiàng and
Dào and make himself better understood (
Lou 2011, p. 414). Though
Dào is an abstract concept “that could not be seen, heard, felt, smelled or sensed,” still
Dào could be “embodied by all things or found in all things”, and people could feel and understand Dao through the changes of things and their observation and experience (
Rao 2006, p. 11). Thus,
Xiàng could serve as the medium for us to better understand
Dào.
The original semantic meaning of
Xiàng is the mammal elephant, but its meaning gradually evolves. In Chapter XXI of
Hán Fēi Zǐ,
Illustrations of Laozi’s Teaching (
Hán Fēi Zǐ jiě lǎo 韩非子解老), the semantic evolution of
Xiàng is recorded as follows:
People can rarely see the living elephants, usually the bones of dead elephants, then some people try to represent the living elephants through pictures. With the help of those images, those who have not seen elephants can know what living elephants look like. Therefore, the images (Xiàng 象) are gradually referred to as people’s concepts of something.
4
In the Paleolithic Era (or Old Stone Age), China’s elephants mainly inhabited the northern regions such as Henan, Shanxi, and Shaanxi. Later, due to the colder climate and the elephants migrated southward. By the Period of Warring States, people in northern China could only see the dead bones of elephants instead of living elephants. Based on the bones, people imagined what living elephants look like (
Wang 2013, p. 22). Since then,
Xiàng has been referred to as what is in people’s minds or people’s concepts of things. For example, the Chinese letters originate from the inscriptions on bones or tortoise shells of the Shang Dynasty. These inscriptions symbolize the images in the external world. China’s ancient calendar was set through the observation of cosmos images. In Chinese medicine,
Xiàng means manifestation. Viscera are hidden inside the body. As manifestation reflects the condition of viscera and can be observed externally, it is called visceral manifestation (
Zàng Xiàng 藏象). Likewise,
Xiàng is an important concept in traditional Chinese aesthetics and painting. Images are widely used in literature and painting to reflect people’s feelings. Besides,
Xiàng is a key term in ancient Chinese philosophy. According to
Zuo Tradition (
zuǒ zhuàn 左传), in the third year of Lord Xuan’s reign (606 BCE), “the cauldrons were cast with images of various creatures. The hundred things were therewith completely set forth, and the people thus knew the spirits and the evil things” (
Zuo 2016, p. 601). Through the casting of images on the cauldrons, “the ancient Chinese developed the early understanding of the relationship between objects and images” (
Zhang 2014, p. 69). Likewise, in the
Zhou Book of Change (
zhōu yì 周易),
Xiàng is paraphrased as follows:
When the sages discovered the esoteric principles under heaven, they compared them to concrete states and appearances, symbolized them with appropriate objects and meaning, and thus called them images.
With the help of images, the sages make profound and obscure knowledge easier to understand for ordinary people. During the process, Xiàng serves as the medium between the physical world and the metaphysical world. In the Dào Dé Jīng, Laozi also uses the concrete Xiàng to interpret the abstract Dào. Such interpretation is based on the common characteristics shared by Wù 物(thing), Xiàng and Dào and their mutual relations. As Dào exists in all things (Wù 物) and things can be referred to as Xiàng, Xiàng shares similar, if not all, characteristics with Dào. From various perspectives, Xiàng is used to interpret Dào, to make the intangible tangible, and to make the abstract concrete. Thus, the essence and core of Dào are better explained.
To some extent, the relationship between
Xiàng and
Dào can also be elaborated by the conceptual metaphor theory. The western conceptual metaphor theory originated from Aristotle’s Poetics and Rhetoric, in which he discussed the rhetorical functions of metaphor. In the 1970s, there occurred a cognitive turn in the conceptual metaphor theory. Developed by Lakoff, Johnson, Turner, and other writers, the theory of conceptual metaphor became more and more mature in their books and articles, including
Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind (
Lakoff 1987),
Metaphors We Live By (
Lakoff and Johnson 1980),
More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor (
Lakoff and Turner 1989) (
Wang 2007, p. 34). The conceptual metaphor theory holds that metaphors are everywhere in daily life and they serve as conceptual norms which influence human thinking. Based on their experience of the objective world, people can understand the target concepts with relatively weak structures through those with relatively strong structures (
Lan 2005, p. 122). Lakoff points out that each metaphor contains a source domain, a target domain, and a source-to-target domain mapping (
Lakoff 1987, p. 68); the direction of metaphorical mapping is from concrete to abstract domains (
Lakoff 1987, pp. 275–76). Lakoff and Mark Turner further define metaphoric mapping as a set of correspondences between two conceptual domains (
Lakoff and Turner 1989, p. 4). However, there can be more than one source domain or one target domain in conceptual metaphors; in other words, metaphoric mapping does not always occur between two conceptual domains. With examples like “An argument is a container” “An argument is a journey” and “An argument is a building”, Kövecses answers “why does a target domain have several origin domains” (
Kövecses 2002, pp. 63–64). Kövecses argues that due to the partiality of metaphorical mappings, people tend to specify one target domain with multiple source domains instead of one. Meanwhile, the mapping from source to target domains can also be partial. In the partial metaphorical utilization, only part of the source domain is used in each metaphor. The used part of the source domain is highlighted in forming the target concept, while the part of the target domain that is not highlighted is hidden. The highlighting process is defined as metaphorical highlighting. One source domain can only play a partial role in forming the target domain, but the mystery of the target domain can be revealed with enough source domains. People can get the whole picture of the target domain with a comprehensive understanding of multiple source domains. Together, these source domains build the structure and content of the target domains, facilitating people’s understanding of abstract concepts (
Kövecses 2002, pp. 84–91).
Kövecses’ model of conceptual metaphor focuses on the relationship between the source domain and target domain, while it pays little attention to the relations between different source domains. Inspired by Kövecses’ theory, this article attempts to analyze the relationship between Dào and Xiàng through the mappings from multiple source domains to one target domain. Though the many-to-one mapping model does not reveal the interrelations among different source domains, or Xiàng in this article, still Kövecses’ theory could bring people closer to the concept of Dào.
As shown in
Figure 1 and
Table 1, [Dào] is the core concept surrounded by the
Xiàng concepts like
Pǔ,
Yī,
Gēn,
Shuǐ,
Mén,
Mǔ,
Yīng’ér,
Gǔ and so on
5. In the
Dào Dé Jīng, Laozi uses concepts like
Mǔ to illustrate his idea of
Dào, and concepts like
Mǔ serve as the
Xiàng (source domain) in building the structure and content of
Dào (target domain). What lie between [Dào] and
Xiàng are the semantic features shared by them. In the figure, the two-way arrows are used to reflect the mutual relations between the two ends
6. For example, the two-way arrows are used to reflect that
Xiàng shares the semantic features and these concepts share intertextuality. As shown in the figure, the author holds that the interrelated mappings from
Xiàng and the semantic features to [Dào] form the semantic field of [Dào], serving as the structure and content of [Dào], and bringing people closer to the concept of [Dào].
3. The Techniques Used in Translating Xiàng in German Translations
The article focuses on the German translations of the
Dào Dé Jīng and aims to analyze them from the perspective of the conceptual metaphor field of
Dào. It has been made clear that
Xiàng acts as the source domain in the conceptual metaphor field of
Dào. Meanwhile, the mapping from the source domain to the target domain diversifies the content and meaning of the target domain. The mapping process coincides with the translation process which happens from the source language to the target language. Excellent German translations of the
Dào Dé Jīng combine the mapping process with the translating process to better illustrate the major concepts in the book. Therefore, based on the six representative German translations published in different times, including
Victor von Strauss (
1870),
Richard Wilhelm (
2010),
Erwin Rousselle (
1985),
Günther Debon (
2014),
Viktor Kalinke (
2000), and
Annette Oelkers (
2014), the article attempts to analyze the three main techniques used in translating
Xiàng in German translations: the shifting of
Xiàng, the conversion of
Xiàng, and the concealment of
Xiàng.
3.1. The Shifting of Xiàng
Based on the corpus-based comparative studies on the above six German translations of the Dào Dé Jīng, the author finds that the shifting of Xiàng is the most commonly used translation technique. In Chinese, Shifting is originally a mathematical concept that means moving all points of an object in the same direction by the same distance on the same plane. Shifting doesn’t change the shape or size of an object but its position. The author borrows this mathematical term to describe the first technique used in translating Xiàng in the German Dào Dé Jīng. With such a translation technique, the translated Xiàng meets the following conditions: (1) The expressions in the German translation are commonly-used ones that match semantic meanings in Chinese, and the translation does not change the original Xiàng and its basic semantics; (2) Xiàng simply gets shifted from the original Chinese text to the German one with its relative function in the target text remains.
For example, the [Mǔ] concept appears in the source text in the forms of
Mǔ 母 (mother),
Cí 雌 (female), and
Pìn 牝 (female). The corresponding expressions of this
Xiàng after being transferred to the German translations are shown in the following table (
Table 2):
As shown in
Table 2, the
Xiàng of [Mǔ] is translated into different German expressions in the six German translations, with those highlighted in bold basically in accord with the Chinese expressions of the
Xiàng. For example,
Mutter means
mother,
Weibheit/Weibliche and
Weib/Weibliche both mean
female, all of which are corresponding expressions of the
Xiàng of [Mǔ] in German.
A similar example is the translation of [Shuǐ] 水 (water), whose expressions in the original text include
Shuǐ 水 (water),
Jiānghǎi 江海 (river or sea), and
Lù 露 (dew), which when shifted to the German translations become the following ones (
Table 3):
As shown in
Table 3, similar to the translation of [Mǔ], the expressions of [Shuǐ] in the German translations, such as
Wasser (water),
Strom (river),
Meer (sea),
Fluss (river),
Tau (dew) and
Nass (clear water), all fall under the category of [Shuǐ] in the original text. It is another typical example of the shifting of
Xiàng. In addition, the translations of [Gǔ] 谷 (valley) as
Tal (valley), and [Pǔ] 朴 (log) as
Rohholz (log) and
unbearbeiteter Stoff (unprocessed timber), etc., are examples of the shifting of
Xiàng.
The shifting of Xiàng keeps the content and form of the original text to the greatest extent. It is a translation with an almost original taste and flavor, which not only conforms better to the translation criterion of faithfulness but also ensures the unity of form and spirit of the translated text. However, from the perspective of the target readers, the Xiàng in the source language may not be familiar to the target readers, or the translated Xiàng means opposite to its original semantic meaning. Thus, the shifting of Xiàng may cause two consequences: first, the same Xiàng cannot be understood by the target readers without detailed annotations; second, the semantic asymmetry between the translated text and the source text could cause misunderstanding. Therefore, the shifting of Xiàng is the most appropriate technique to preserve both the form and spirit of Xiàng in the target language, as long as the Xiàng has slight semantic changes, or it is familiar to the target readers. Moreover, from the perspective of the conceptual metaphor field, this pattern keeps the metaphorical mapping relationship and mapping content of the original text.
3.2. The Conversion of Xiàng
Through data analysis, the author finds the second translation technique: the conversion of Xiàng. That is, the translator, when translating a Xiàng, uses another Xiàng in the place of the original one, thus introducing a conversion in translation. By further analyzing this technique, the author divides the conversion of Xiàng into the following two groups according to the mechanisms:
3.2.1. The Conceptual Conversion
The translators actively adopt translation strategies to avoid the disadvantages of shifting. When cultural differences pose obstacles to the readers’ understanding of the original
Xiàng while it is being transferred from the original text to the target text, the translator uses another
Xiàng in the target language culture with the same metaphorical meaning to eliminate or reduce the obstacles to the readers. The most typical example of conversion among the six German translations is Erwin Rousselle’s translation of [Mén]门 (door). Different from the other five translations which usually use the shifting of
Xiàng to translate
Mén 门 (door) from the original text into
Tor (door) and
Tür (door) in German, Rousselle translated the two
Mén in Chapter 1 and Chapter 6 of the
Dào Dé Jīng, both into
Schoß, as shown in the following table (
Table 4):
As shown in
Table 4, the basic semantic meaning of [Mén] in the German cultural context is the passage of entrance and exit, while that of
Schoß in German is the “pregnant woman’s abdomen” or “woman’s private parts”, which is closely related to productivity. If translated into
Tor or
Tür, German readers would not be able to understand [Mén] without detailed annotations. Beyond the
Dào Dé Jīng,
Schoß is more relevant to [Mǔ] than to [Mén] both in Chinese and German. The converted
Xiàng not only affiliates itself with another
Xiàng ([Mǔ]) in the conceptual metaphor field of
Dào, but also relates itself to the creativity and originality of
Dào in the German culture. This cannot be achieved by the shifting of
Xiàng like
Tor or
Tür. The conversion of
Xiàng not only keeps the expressions about
Dào as interpreted by
Xiàng in the original text but also conveys the original and creative semantic features of
Dào, making it easier for German readers to understand.
3.2.2. The Deviated Conversion
The reason for this conversion is the translator’s misunderstanding of the semantics of the original text or the existence of discrepancies between the reference text and the authoritative edition. For example (
Table 5):
As shown in
Table 5, Rousselle translated the two
Pìn in Chapter 6 of the
Dào Dé Jīng into
Tiergöttin (Goddess of Animals). The title of Rousselle’s version of the
Dào Dé Jīng is called
Lao-tse. Führung und Kraft aus der Ewigkeit (
Lao-tse. Guidance and Strength from Eternity 1985); and
Dào is translated as
Führerin throughout his translation. Therefore, from the perspective of textual semantics, Rousselle’s conversion of
Xiàng stems from his goddess-based interpretation of [Dào], which is an adaptation in the context of goddess discourse. Strauss converted
Gēn 根 (root) in Chapter 26 into
Chén 臣 (minister), a character with irrelevant semantic meanings because he took a different reference from the He Shang Gong Version. (
Wang 1993, p. 107) This conversion of
Xiàng was a de facto conversion, though not a product of Strauss’ subjective action. Moreover, Rousselle and Debon both translated
Dǐ 柢 (root) in Chapter 59 into
Stamm (tree trunk). Although the trunk and roots are both components of trees, they are not identical parts. More importantly, the semantic features conveyed by them are not the same. The reason for this deviation is probably that Rousselle and Debon had applied the expressions (
Wurzel and
Stamm) with a high level of co-occurrence.
From the perspective of conceptual metaphor, although conversion happened after Xiàng is translated, the metaphorical mapping relationship still exists because of the adoption of a new Xiàng in the translated text, whereas the translation uses a new source domain to describe the original target domain.
3.3. The Concealment of Xiàng
Compared with the above two techniques, the concealment of Xiàng makes the biggest change during the translation. This means the translator will conceal the Xiàng in the source text by completely not using it or only partially using it in the target text. Therefore, according to its concealment extent, the concealment of Xiàng in the translation can be divided into two types: the total concealment of Xiàng and the partial concealment of Xiàng.
3.3.1. The Total Concealment of Xiàng
This is quite typical in Annette Oelkers’ translation, as shown in the following table (
Table 6):
As shown in
Table 6, in the
Dào Dé Jīng, she translated
Mǔ 母 in Chapters 1, 52, and 59 and
Gēn 根 in Chapters 6 and 16 into
Ursprung (a German word meaning
origin). Yet
Mǔ in Chapter 20 was translated into
Dào,
Cí 雌 in Chapter 10 into
Neues leben entsteht (a German phrase meaning
creating new life),
Pìn 牝 in Chapter 6 into
dem weiblichen Prinzip; ohne Ende wird neues Leben geboren (German phrases meaning
the law of the female; endless creation of new life), and
Gēn 根 in Chapter 26 into
Grundlage (a German word which means
foundation) or
die Verbindung mit dir (a German phrase meaning
contact with you), etc. The reason why Oelkers largely adopted total concealment is that she intended to interpret the
Dào Dé Jīng in a chicken-soup style in her translation with more use of close-to-life wording and Free Translation. Therefore, she preferred erasing the
Xiàng that indirectly indicates the characteristics of
Dào and directly depicting them in her language. Such translation surely facilitated readers to understand her interpretation of
Dào, but it also lost the literary and aesthetic value of the source text in which
Xiàng was used to explain
Dào.
In addition to the above examples in Annette Oelkers’ translation, [Pǔ] was the most totally-concealed Xiàng and the only one that was concealed in all six versions of the translation. Pǔ 朴 appeared eight times in the source text. As listed in the following table, only the first one was translated with the technique of shifting, the other seven were translated into Einfalt/Einfältigkeit/einfältig (German words meaning simplicity), Einfachheit/einfach (German words that also represent simplicity), or Lauterkeit (a German word that means purity) that can directly indicate their semantic characteristics.
As shown in
Table 7, the literal German translation
Pǔ 朴 is
Rohholz, the semantic meaning of which is
log. In German,
Rohholz has no symbolic meanings, let alone the metaphorical meanings similar to those contained in the source text. Simply shifting
Pǔ into
Rohholz would make it hard for German readers to understand the source text. To solve this problem, the translators concealed
Pǔ and directly presented its metaphorical meanings.
3.3.2. The Partial Concealment of Xiàng
This means that some of
Xiàng are translated into other forms. They are not translated as individual concepts but collateral concepts. The meaning of these
Xiàng can be seen in different expressions, as shown in the following table (
Table 8):
In the above examples in
Table 8,
Xiàng concepts like [Mǔ] [Gǔ] [Gēn] and [Pǔ] are not translated as individual concepts, but their semantic features are kept in other forms. The words in bold in
Table 8 like
weiblich (female),
Tal (valley),
Wurzel (root), and
Holz (log) maintain the features of the corresponding
Xiàng. Though these words are attributives or compound words, the semantic features of the
Xiàng are concealed in them. The partial concealment of
Xiàng essentially takes the form of the “
Xiàng + its metaphorical meaning.” Together such form shall be regarded as simile, instead of metaphor.
4. The Differences between the Transfer Modes of Xiàng in German Translations
Based on the above analysis, the author lists the features of the transfer modes of
Xiàng in German translations in
Table 9 to examine the source domain, target domain, and the mapped semantic features (common features shared by
Dào and
Xiàng) before and after the translation.
According to
Table 9, we can find that: (1) Through the shifting of
Xiàng, the source domain, target domain, and mapped semantic features remain unchanged after translation. (2) Through the conceptual conversion of
Xiàng, the target domain and mapped semantic features remain unchanged while the source domain changes. However, if the translation is based on misreading or the different versions of the original text, only the target domain remains unchanged. (3) In the total concealment of
Xiàng, the conceptual metaphors in the original text are not translated; the source domain and target domain are concealed, while the mapped semantic features are expressed explicitly. In the partial concealment of
Xiàng, the mapped semantic features in the source language remain unchanged while the conceptual metaphors are changed to similes or fixed expressions in German which are usually ignored.
Judging from the effects of the different translation modes, through the shifting of Xiàng, the three elements of conceptual metaphor remain unchanged. However, such a mode does not always mean it is the best translation technique in dealing with Chinese classics. For example, Strauss and Wilhelm take such a mode in translating the Dào Dé Jīng in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, but their target readers are usually missionaries, sinologists, philosophers, and other professional scholars who are familiar with Chinese culture. Therefore, they use the shifting of Xiàng to maintain “both the form and spirit” of the original texts. Meanwhile, there are many annotations in their versions of the Dào Dé Jīng. Given the detailed explanation and annotation in the preface of Strauss’s translation, Strauss knows the huge differences between the two cultures and tries to bring German readers closer to the Chinese culture. Next to the shifting of Xiàng, the other two modes are also indispensable in translating Chinese classics like the Dào Dé Jīng. They all play essential roles in translation and cross-cultural communication.
5. Conclusions
In the past two centuries, excellent German translations of the Dào Dé Jīng kept on popping up, making the Dào Dé Jīng popular in the German regions and influencing people in various fields. Thanks to German translators’ flexible translation techniques used in translating Xiàng 象 (Symbolic Imagery, image), the gist of the Dào Dé Jīng and Laozi’s philosophical thinking becomes understandable and acceptable to readers. In the Dào Dé Jīng, Laozi uses concrete Xiàng to illustrate the abstract Dào, and these Xiàng concepts serve as the source domains of the target domain, namely Dào. Gradually the content and semantic features of Dào become diversified and enriched. Meanwhile, compared to Dào, Xiàng is easier to understand and more accessible in people’s daily life. From their daily experience, people gradually have a comprehensive and holistic view of Dào. Thus, the translation of Xiàng becomes a key issue and a tough issue in the translation of the Dào Dé Jīng. Based on the conceptual metaphor theory developed by Lakoff, Johnson, Turner, Kövecses, and other linguists, the author focuses on the translation of Xiàng concepts in six representative German versions of the Dào Dé Jīng and summarizes three techniques used in translating the Dào Dé Jīng: the shifting, conversion, and concealment. These techniques make the abstract Dào translatable and bring Laozi’s ideas closer to German-speaking readers.
Instead of focusing on the pros and cons of different German versions of the Dào Dé Jīng, this article focuses on analyzing the translation techniques or the transfer modes of Xiàng in German translations of the Dào Dé Jīng. The flexible translation techniques used by the German translators made Dào Dé Jīng popular in the German-speaking regions. Through the shifting of Xiàng, German translators attempted to find the replacement of the concepts of the Dào Dé Jīng in their native language, making small shifts between the source language and target language. Meanwhile, they use detailed annotations to illustrate the abstract concepts, maximizing the illustration of Dào to readers. Without these annotations, their translation will be confusing and obscure. Through the conversion of Xiàng, German translators narrow the cultural differences between the source and target language. Some of the Chinese Xiàng concepts in Chinese are conversed with new German concepts to facilitate German readers’ understanding of Dào. With the help of the conversed German concepts, the German readers feel close to these unknown Chinese concepts and have a holistic view of the semantic features of Dào. Through the concealment of Xiàng, German translators stick to the principle that “less is more.” German translators choose not to translate some of the Xiàng concepts to avoid making the readers confused. Though such concealment does not convey the original linguistic and aesthetic features of the texts, the semantic features and meaning are maintained. It is regrettable to make such concealment, but such concealment can facilitate people’s understanding of the text.
To sum up, the flexible translation of Xiàng in German versions of the Dào Dé Jīng inspires future translations of ancient Chinese classics. The translation of Chinese classics needs more than the translators’ proficient language skills in dealing with unique Chinese concepts and terms; it also requires the translators to have profound knowledge of different cultures and sharp conceptions of cultural differences. It is easy to translate the words but not the thoughts. Rigid translation of culture can only convey words not thoughts. Contemporary translators need to pay more attention to the cultural backgrounds of their target readers and choose words carefully, turning their translation into a bridge of cross-cultural communication. Though modern translators have done a great job in their work, they still have a long way to go.