An Empirical Study on the Impact of E-Commerce Live Features on Consumers’ Purchase Intention: From the Perspective of Flow Experience and Social Presence
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Social Presence Theories
2.2. Flow Experience Theories
2.3. Purchase Intention
2.4. Involvement Theories
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Model Establishment
3.2. Questionnaire Design
4. Results
4.1. Verification of Reliability and Validity
4.2. Path Detection
4.3. Detection of Regulating Effect
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
6.1. Theoretical Implications
6.2. Implications for the E-Economic Live Streaming Platform and Hosts
6.3. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Constructs and Items |
---|
A: The content of live broadcasting |
A1: Broadcast with goods can be a comprehensive dynamic display of goods or services |
A2: Anchors in live streaming can give professional responses to questions related to products or services |
A3: Anchors in live broadcasting can give personalized suggestions according to their own descriptions |
C: Host charm |
C1: I prefer to watch the products recommended by network celebrities |
C2: I expect to purchase and use web celebrity hot style |
C3: Recommended by network celebrities, increased my demand for online shopping |
D:Interactions |
D1: I can effectively interact with network celebrities in the live broadcast with goods |
D2: I live with goods to be able to communicate with other consumers |
D3: I am eager to participate in the interaction in the live broadcast with goods |
F: Trust |
F1: By viewing live video with goods, I trust the host more |
F2: I believe that the products and services recommended by the host are shared after their personal experience |
F3: I believe the products and services recommended by the host are useful to everyone |
J: Social presence experience |
J1: You can have a social feeling while watching a live webcast |
J2: When you watch a live webcast, you can feel the situation of contact with people |
J3: Watching a live webcast, you can feel a sense of human passion |
J4: While watching a live webcast, you can feel the presence of other relevant parties |
J5: Other interested parties will be aware of your presence while watching a live webcast |
J6: In the course of watching a live webcast, you can exchange information with other interested parties |
I:Flow experience |
I1: I was very focused when I was watching the live broadcast |
I2: When I watch live, I feel manipulative |
I3: When I watched the live broadcast, I felt the time passed quickly |
I4: I enjoyed the whole live broadcasting |
L: consumption intention |
L1: If the shop has the goods I need, I am willing to spend in this shop |
L2: If there is a future demand for similar goods, I would like to purchase them here |
L3: I would like to recommend this shop to others for suggestions |
L4: I would like to recommend this shop when others inquire about the goods |
L5: If the goods in this shop meet my needs, I am willing to spend money in this shop |
K: Involvement |
K1: I am very interested in live streaming of e-commerce |
K2: I often watch live broadcasts through live streaming platforms |
K3: I usually attach great importance to the practicality and entertainment of e-commerce live broadcast |
K4: I consider myself a member of the e-commerce live streaming community |
References
- Tang, X.J.; Huang, C.X.; Wang, D. “5G+”: A new starting point for the development of new media in China: The current situation and prospect of the development of new media in China during 2019–2020. News Writ. 2020, 433, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, Y.; Yin, W.H. The Dramaturgical Marketing in Online Live Shopping: Analysis Base on Tik-Tok Platform. J. Shanghai Univ. Int. Bus. Econ. 2021, 28, 114–124. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, Z.H.; Ge, J.P.; Zhou, X. Understanding Antecedents of Live Video Stream Continuance Use and Users’ Subjective Well-being via Expectation Confirmation Model and Parasocial Relationships. Journal. Commun. Rev. 2020, 73, 29–46. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, J.H.; Li, Q. Effect of Connection Attributes of Platform-based Business Model Innovation on Value co-creation Based on Case Study of Airbnb. Manag. Rev. 2016, 28, 252–260. [Google Scholar]
- Bu, Q.J.; Jin, Y.S.; Li, Z.H. Does Interactive Behavior Certainly Create Value? The Effect of Customer Value Co-creation Interactive Behavior on Customer Value. Foreign Econ. Manag. 2016, 38, 21–37, 50. [Google Scholar]
- Fei, H.P.; Zhou, C.H. Anchor Type Brand Attitude and Purchase Intention: Experimental Research on Online Live Shopping Scene. J. Henan Norm. Univ. (Philos. Soc. Sci.) 2021, 48, 80–89. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, D.L. Research on Brand Exposure and Sales Transformation in the Era of Online Broadcast: Taking Shopping Broadcast Platform as an Example. J. Commer. Econ. 2018, 740, 62–64. [Google Scholar]
- Sussman, S.W.; Siegal, W.S. Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption. Inf. Syst. Res. 2003, 14, 47–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Meng, F. Research of Opinion Leaders’ Impact on Purchase Intention under Social Commerce; Nanjing University: Nanjing, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Dai, J.P.; Yuan, Z.X.; Fang, R. A review on the effect of social presence in the context of social e-commerce. J. Commer. Econ. 2019, 784, 75–78. [Google Scholar]
- Witmer, B.G.; Singer, M.J. Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 1998, 7, 225–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, R.S.; Engelland, B.; Tung, W.H. Exploring attitudes and purchase intentions in a brand-oriented, highly interactive web site setting. Mark. Manag. J. 2006, 16, 94–106. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.M.; Chen, L. The impact of flow on online consumer behavior. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2010, 50, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Noort, G.V.; Voorveld, H.; Reijmersdal, E. Interactivity in Brand Web Sites: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Responses Explained by Consumers’ Online Flow Experience. J. Interact. Mark. 2012, 26, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luna, D.; Peracchio, L.A.; de Juan, M.D. Flow in individual websites: Model estimation and cross cultural validation. Adv. Consum. Res. 2003, 30, 280–301. [Google Scholar]
- Novak, T.; Hoffman, D.; Yung, Y. Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Mark. Sci. 2000, 19, 22–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, J.; Cong, F.; Kang, F. Influential Factor Analysis of Consumers’ Online Purchase Behavior: A Flow Experience Approach. Nankai Bus. Rev. 2009, 12, 132–140. [Google Scholar]
- Song, M.Y.; Xiao, H.J.; Qi, L.Y.; Yu, L.L. Relationship between Brand Experience and Purchasing Intention:Smart-Phone Market Based on the Moderating Effect of Brand Involvement. J. Dalian Univ. Technol. (Soc. Sci.) 2014, 35, 62–68. [Google Scholar]
- Saura, J.R. Using Data Sciences in Digital Marketing: Framework, methods, and performance metrics. J. Innov. Knowl. 2021, 6, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Short, J.; Williams, E.; Christie, B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications; Wiley: London, UK, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Shin, D.H.; Shin, Y.J. Consumers’ trust in virtual mall shopping: The role of social presence and perceived security. Int. J. Interact. 2011, 27, 450–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.M.; Nass, C. Social-psychological origins of feelings of presence: Creating social presence with machine-generated voices. Media Psychol. 2005, 7, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, B.Z.; Fan, W.G.; Zhou, M. Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 56, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dai, B.; Liu, Y.Z. Examining Users’ Intention to Continue Using Wechat Based on the Expectation-Confirmation Model, Social Presence and Flow Experience. J. Mod. Inf. 2015, 35, 19–23. [Google Scholar]
- Ogonowski, A.; Montandon, A.; Botha, E.; Reyneke, M. Should new online stores invest in social presence elements? The effect of social presence on initial trust formation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2014, 21, 482–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, J. Social comparison, social presence, and enjoyment in the acceptance of social shopping websites. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 2012, 13, 198–212. [Google Scholar]
- Animesh, A.; Pinsonneault, A.; Yang, S.-B.; Oh, W. An odyssey into virtual worlds: Exploring the impacts of technological and spatial environments on intention to purchase virtual products1. MIS Q. 2011, 35, 789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Csikszentmihalyi, M.; MacAloon, D. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Trevino, L.K.; Webster, J. Flow in Computer-Mediated Communication. Commun. Res. 1992, 19, 539–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghani, J.A.; Supnick, R.; Rooney, P. The Experience of Flow In Computer-Mediated And In Face-To-Face Groups. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 1991, New York, NY, USA, 16–18 December 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Koufaris, M. Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 2002, 13, 205–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, J.; Kim, M. Spectator e-sport and well-being through live streaming services. Technol. Soc. 2020, 63, 101401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Guan, Z.; Chong, A.Y.L.; Hou, F. What drives people to purchase virtual gifts in live streaming? The mediating role of flow. In Proceedings of the 22nd Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2018), Yokohama City, Japan, 26–30 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Yi, L.; Yi, P. What Drives Gift-giving Intention in Live Streaming? The Perspectives of Emotional Attachment and Flow Experience. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2021, 37, 1317–1329. [Google Scholar]
- Scheibe, K.; Fietkiewicz, K.J.; Stock, W.G. Information Behavior on Social Live Streaming Services. J. Inf. Sci. Theory Pract. 2016, 4, 6–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hoffman, D.L.; Novak, T.P. Flow online: Lessons learned and future prospects. J. Interact. Mark. 2009, 23, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Z.J.; Shi, X.L. The loyalty of group purchase website: Based on the flow and expectation confirmation theory. Sci. Technol. Manag. 2013, 15, 30–34. [Google Scholar]
- Oh, J.; Yoon, S.; Park, B. A structural approach to examine the quality attributes of e-shopping malls using the Kano model. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2012, 24, 305–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuo, W.M.; Wang, X.; Fan, C. Relationship between Electronic Word of Mouth and Purchase Intention in Social Commerce Environment: A Social Capital Perspectiv. Nankai Bus. Rev. 2014, 17, 140–150, 160. [Google Scholar]
- Loiacono, E.; Watson, R.; Goodhue, D. Web Qual: An Instrument for Consumer Evaluation of Web Sites. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2007, 11, 51–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathwick, C.; Malhotra, N.; Rigdon, E. Experiential Value: Conceptualization, Measurement and Application in the Catalog and Internet Shopping Environment. J. Retail. 2001, 77, 39–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, C.L.; Chang, K.C.; Chen, M.C. Flow experience and Internet shopping behavior: Investigating the moderating effect of consumer characteristics. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2012, 29, 317–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, H.; Suh, K.S.; Lee, U.K. Effects of collaborative online shopping on shopping experience through social and relational perspectives. Inf. Manag. 2013, 50, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, H.; Li, Z.; Lin, X.; Yu, S. Effect Mechanism of Internet Word of Mouth: The Mediation of Trust and the Moderation of Gender and Involvement. J. Syst. Manag. 2019, 28, 401–413. [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro-Navarrete, S.; Saura, J.R.; Palacios-Marqués, D. Towards a new era of mass data collection: Assessing pandemic surveillance technologies to preserve user privacy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 167, 120681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saura, J.R.; Palacios-Marqués, D.; Iturricha-Fernández, A. Ethical design in social media: Assessing the main performance measurements of user online behavior modification. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 129, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saura, J.R.; Ribeiro-Soriano, D.; Palacios-Marqués, D. From user-generated data to data-driven innovation: A research agenda to understand user privacy in digital markets. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 60, 102331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Factor | Standardization Estimate | AVE | CR | Cronbach’s Alpha |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The content of live broadcasting (A) | A1 | 0.907 | 0.880 | 0.957 | 0.956 |
A2 | 0.979 | ||||
A3 | 0.927 | ||||
Host charm (C) | C1 | 0.876 | 0.804 | 0.925 | 0.924 |
C2 | 0.947 | ||||
C3 | 0.865 | ||||
Interactions (D) | D1 | 0.938 | 0.855 | 0.947 | 0.946 |
D2 | 0.932 | ||||
D3 | 0.904 | ||||
Trust (F) | F1 | 0.897 | 0.805 | 0.925 | 0.925 |
F2 | 0.911 | ||||
F3 | 0.884 | ||||
Flow experience (I) | I1 | 0.766 | 0.700 | 0.903 | 0.903 |
I2 | 0.829 | ||||
I3 | 0.893 | ||||
I4 | 0.855 | ||||
Social presence experience (J) | J1 | 0.795 | 0.716 | 0.938 | 0.937 |
J2 | 0.871 | ||||
J3 | 0.848 | ||||
J4 | 0.884 | ||||
J5 | 0.874 | ||||
J6 | 0.803 | ||||
Consumption intention (L) | L1 | 0.854 | 0.785 | 0.948 | 0.948 |
L2 | 0.892 | ||||
L3 | 0.890 | ||||
L4 | 0.911 | ||||
L5 | 0.882 | ||||
Involvement (K) | K1 | 0.811 | 0.653 | 0.883 | 0.877 |
K2 | 0.800 | ||||
K3 | 0.827 | ||||
K4 | 0.794 |
The Content | Host Charm | Interactions | Trust | Flow Experience | Social Presence | Consumption Intention | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The content | 0.938 | ||||||
Host charm | 0.082 | 0.897 | |||||
Interactions | 0.138 | 0.279 | 0.925 | ||||
Trust | 0.255 | 0.253 | 0.270 | 0.897 | |||
Flow experience | 0.106 | 0.300 | 0.210 | 0.340 | 0.837 | ||
Social presence | 0.113 | 0.277 | 0.254 | 0.330 | 0.443 | 0.846 | |
Consumption intention | 0.141 | 0.231 | 0.232 | 0.296 | 0.302 | 0.247 | 0.886 |
Constucts | Absolute Fit Indices | Incremental Fit Indices | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X2 | Standardized RMR | CMIN/DF | GFI | NFI | CFI | IFI | |
Model | 0.000 | 0.051 | 2.282 | 0.86 | 0.914 | 0.949 | 0.95 |
Reference ranges | p > 0.05 | <0.07 | <3 | >0.8 | >0.8 | <1.0 | <1.0 |
Hypothesis | Path | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | p | Results | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1a | Social presence | <--- | The content | 0.013 | 0.047 | 0.286 | 0.775 | |
H1b | <--- | Host charm | 0.119 | 0.043 | 2.735 | 0.006 | Supported | |
H1c | <--- | Interactions | 0.084 | 0.04 | 2.088 | 0.037 | Supported | |
H1d | <--- | Trust | 0.167 | 0.044 | 3.78 | *** | Supported | |
H2a | Flow experience | <--- | The content | 0.008 | 0.043 | 0.192 | 0.848 | |
H2b | <--- | Host charm | 0.091 | 0.041 | 2.226 | 0.026 | Supported | |
H2c | <--- | Interactions | 0.021 | 0.037 | 0.548 | 0.584 | ||
H2d | <--- | Trust | 0.122 | 0.042 | 2.912 | 0.004 | Supported | |
H3 | <--- | Social presence | 0.296 | 0.059 | 5.05 | *** | Supported | |
H4 | Consumption intention | <--- | Social presence | 0.117 | 0.059 | 1.98 | 0.048 | Supported |
H5 | <--- | Flow experience | 0.206 | 0.064 | 3.225 | 0.001 | Supported |
Path | Involvement | C.R. | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low (N = 150, SD = 0.582) | High (N = 167, SD = 0.471) | ||||||
Estimate | p | Estimate | p | ||||
Social presence | <--- | The content | 0.119 | 0.093 | −0.036 | 0.524 | −0.012 |
<--- | Host charm | 0.200 | 0.001 | 0.034 | 0.519 | −0.488 | |
<--- | Interactions | 0.211 | *** | −0.049 | 0.323 | 0.241 | |
<--- | Trust | 0.093 | 0.165 | 0.134 | 0.01 | −0.822 | |
Flow experience | <--- | The content | −0.013 | 0.844 | −0.014 | 0.788 | −1.708 |
<--- | Host charm | 0.101 | 0.102 | 0.062 | 0.211 | −2.036 | |
<--- | Interactions | −0.029 | 0.617 | −0.011 | 0.815 | −1.381 | |
<--- | Trust | 0.152 | 0.020 | 0.084 | 0.093 | 2.485 | |
<--- | Social presence | 0.451 | *** | 0.053 | 0.517 | −3.190 | |
Consumption intention | <--- | Social presence | 0.134 | 0.128 | −0.001 | 0.989 | −1.437 |
<--- | Flow experience | 0.209 | 0.022 | 0.035 | 0.664 | 2.415 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, H.; Ding, J.; Akram, U.; Yue, X.; Chen, Y. An Empirical Study on the Impact of E-Commerce Live Features on Consumers’ Purchase Intention: From the Perspective of Flow Experience and Social Presence. Information 2021, 12, 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12080324
Wang H, Ding J, Akram U, Yue X, Chen Y. An Empirical Study on the Impact of E-Commerce Live Features on Consumers’ Purchase Intention: From the Perspective of Flow Experience and Social Presence. Information. 2021; 12(8):324. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12080324
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Haijian, Jianyi Ding, Umair Akram, Xialei Yue, and Yitao Chen. 2021. "An Empirical Study on the Impact of E-Commerce Live Features on Consumers’ Purchase Intention: From the Perspective of Flow Experience and Social Presence" Information 12, no. 8: 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12080324
APA StyleWang, H., Ding, J., Akram, U., Yue, X., & Chen, Y. (2021). An Empirical Study on the Impact of E-Commerce Live Features on Consumers’ Purchase Intention: From the Perspective of Flow Experience and Social Presence. Information, 12(8), 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12080324