The Impact of Virtual Reality (VR) Tour Experience on Tourists’ Intention to Visit
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- Modeling the concept of telepresence to identify its dimensions that are most likely to influence tourist responses in a domestic context;
- (2)
- Exploring the effect of a VR tour experience on customer behavior in a domestic tourist context, investigating how the virtual tour is able to create realistic mental images and generate favorable attitudes toward the tourist destination;
- (3)
- Examining the mediating role of mental imagery and attitudes towards the domestic tourist destination.
2. Literature Review
2.1. VR and Its Influence on Tourism
2.2. Media Richness Theory
2.3. Telepresence
2.3.1. Definition
2.3.2. Determinants
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Study 1: «Exploratory» Qualitative Study
3.1.1. Methods
3.1.2. The Choice of the Destination «Monastir»
3.1.3. Data Collection Mode
3.1.4. Interviewing Process
3.1.5. Study Sample
3.1.6. The Method of Data Analysis and the Approach Followed for the Qualitative Analysis
3.1.7. Results
“It was very real, an exact presentation of the real world”;(P1)
“It is a very good experience, very identical to the real world”;(P2)
“What attracted me to this experience was the effect of reality, I mean that the video describes the real world exactly”;(P3)
“The virtual world is a world very close to the real world because it represents reality in the form of a 360-degree video”;(P12)
“In my opinion, the main characteristic of this experience is reality, it was very real, very identical to a real visit”;(P20)
“What caught my attention was the effect of reality: everything was real”.(P24)
“I was totally disconnected and isolated from the real world” (P5), “I was totally immersed and disconnected from the real world”;(P9)
“The virtual world is a world very close to the real world, (…), which is why I felt a kind of immersion in the destination”;(P12)
“During the virtual visit, I felt that I was immersed in the virtual environment”.(P17)
“Although I had the impression of really being in Monastir but still, I did not feel like I was 100% isolated from the real world. I lived this experience well, but I was always aware of the real world”.
“I was very connected with the virtual world but that does not mean that I did not feel total isolation of the real world”.
“I felt as if I was really in this place”,(P1)
“It’s a very nice experience, (…), which allowed me to have the impression of being there”,(P2)
“I had the impression of really being in Monastir”,(P8)
“I felt that I was really walking in Monastir”,(P10)
“Even though I visited this place, I felt I was present while viewing the promotional video in virtual reality”.(P15)
3.2. Refining the Research Hypotheses and Elaborating the Conceptual Framework
3.2.1. The Impact of Telepresence on Mental Imagery
“I liked this experience because it allowed me to feel as if I were in Monastir, and this is what actually allowed me to create mental images of the destination”.(P4)
“When viewing the video in virtual reality, my brain creates mental images based on what I have seen and on my feeling of being present in the destination”.(P8)
“The virtual world allows you to disconnect from the real world and therefore helps you to concentrate on creating mental images of the destination” (P5), “(…) I was totally immersed and disconnected from the real world. In my opinion, if I were not disconnected from my real environment, I could not create mental images”.(P9)
“What caught my attention was the effect of reality: everything was real”,(P10)
“It was very real, an accurate presentation of the real world, and that’s what allowed me to create mental images”;(P1)
“The realism of the virtual tour, the identical reproduction of the real world, allowed me to have images of the destination in my brain”;(P5)
“In my opinion, the main characteristic of this experience is the reality, it was very real, very identical to a real visit. This effect of reality helped me build images in my brain about the destination”;(P6)
“What attracted me was the effect of reality, the visit was very close to reality, and in my opinion, this is what made it possible to create mental images of the destination. I think I will use these images when organizing the actual visit”.(P14)
3.2.2. The Impact of Telepresence on Attitude
“The virtual visit and, more precisely, the feeling of presence that I felt in the destination allowed me to have a positive attitude about the destination before visiting it”;(P9)
“Among the consequences of the virtual visit, the development of an attitude about this destination”.(P11)
3.2.3. The Impact of Mental Imagery on Visit Intentions
3.2.4. The Impact of Attitude on Visit Intentions
3.2.5. The Impact of Telepresence on Visit Intentions
“In my experience, I had a great desire to go there and visit Monastir”;(P4)
“The virtual visit was quite like the real world, which made me feel like I was there. This feeling encouraged me to visit Monastir”;(P1)
“To immerse myself and to feel present in the destination allows me to have an intention of actually visiting it”;(P14)
“The virtual visit increased my intention to visit Monastir”.(P5)
3.2.6. The Mediating Effects of Mental Imagery and Attitude towards the Tourist Destination in the Telepresence-Visit Intentions Relationship
The Mediating Effect of Mental Imagery
The Mediating Effect of Attitude towards the Tourist Destination
3.2.7. The Conceptual Framework of the Study
3.3. Study 2: “Confirmatory” Quantitative Study
3.3.1. Measurement
3.3.2. Research Procedure
4. Results and Findings
4.1. Initial Data Screening
4.2. Common Method Bias
4.3. Demographic Profile
4.4. Confirmatory Factor Analysis
4.5. Structural Model
4.6. Model after Mediation
5. Discussion
6. Implications
6.1. Theoretical Implications
6.2. Managerial Implications
7. Limitation and Future Research Avenues
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zeng, G.; Cao, X.; Lin, Z.; Xiao, S.H. When online reviews meet virtual reality: Effects on consumer hotel booking. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020, 81, 102–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stamboulis, Y.; Skayannis, P. Innovation strategies and technology for experience-based tourism. Tour. Manag. 2003, 24, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neuhofer, B.; Buhalis, D.; Ladkin, A. A typology of technology-enhanced tourism experiences. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2014, 16, 340–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mura, P.; Tavakoli, R.; Sharif, S.P. ‘Authentic but not too much’: Exploring perceptions of authenticity of virtual tourism. Inf. Technol. Tour. 2017, 17, 145–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tussyadiah, I.P.; Wang, D.; Jia, C. Virtual reality and attitudes toward tourism destinations. In Proceedings of the Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2017: Proceedings of the International Conference, Rome, Italy, 24–26 January 2017; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland; pp. 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tussyadiah, I.P.; Wang, D.; Jung, T.H.; Tom Dieck, M.C. Virtual reality, presence, and attitude change: Empirical evidence from tourism. Tour. Manag. 2018, 66, 140–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buhalis, D.; Law, R. Progress in information technology and tourism management: 20 years on and 10 years after the Internet—The state of eTourism research. Tour. Manag. 2008, 29, 609–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tussyadiah, I.P. Toward a theoretical foundation for experience design in tourism. J. Travel. Res. 2014, 53, 543–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neuhofer, B.; Buhalis, D.; Ladkin, A. Conceptualising technology enhanced destination experiences. J. Dest. Mark. Manag. 2012, 1, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellezza, F.S.; Apel, M.B.; Hatala, M.H. The effects of imagery and pleasantness on recalling brand names. J. Ment. Imag.-N. Y.-Int. Imag. Assoc. 2001, 25, 47–62. [Google Scholar]
- Schlosser, A.E. Learning through virtual product experience: The role of imagery on true versus false memories. J. Consum. Res. 2006, 33, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escalas, J.E. Imagine yourself in the product: Mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion. J. Advert. 2004, 33, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, J.; Kim, M. The effects of online product presentation on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective. J. Bus. Res. 2014, 67, 2464–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balbo, L.; Gavard-Perret, M.L. Effets du cadrage du message sur les intentions en faveur du frottis: Une modération par l’objectif du comportement recommandé, médiatisée par la valence de l’imagerie mentale. Rech. Appl. Mark. 2015, 30, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacInnis, D.J.; Price, L.L. The role of imagery in information processing: Review and extensions. J. Consum. Res. 1987, 13, 473–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lao, A.; Martin, A.; Jeanpert, S. Stimulation de la présence et des états affectifs par l’imagerie mentale. Une application aux visites en 3D versus 2D. Téoros. Rev. Rech. Tour. 2019, 38, 1–23. Available online: http://journals.openedition.org/teoros/3835 (accessed on 28 December 2021).
- Steuer, J. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. J. Commun. 1992, 42, 73–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fox, J.; Bailenson, J.; Binney, J. Virtual experiences, physical behaviors: The effect of presence on imitation of an eating avatar. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 2009, 18, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogicevic, V.; Seo, S.; Kandampully, J.A.; Liu, S.Q.; Rudd, N.A. Virtual reality presence as a preamble of tourism experience: The role of mental imagery. Tour. Manag. 2019, 74, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, T.; tom Dieck, M.C.; Lee, H.; Chung, N. Effects of virtual reality and augmented reality on visitor experiences in museum. In Proceedings of the Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2016: Proceedings of the International Conference, Bilbao, Spain, 2–5 February 2016; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland; pp. 621–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, W.; Qi, R.; Zhang, L. Effects of virtual reality on theme park visitors’ experience and behaviors: A presence perspective. Tour. Manag. 2019, 71, 282–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, T.H.; Tom Dieck, M.C. Augmented reality, virtual reality and 3D printing for the co-creation of value for the visitor experience at cultural heritage places. J. Place. Manag. Dev. 2017, 10, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabello, J.M.; Franco, J.M.; Collado, A.; Janer, J.; Cruz-Lara, S.; Oyarzun, D.; Armisen, A.; Geraerts, R. Standards in virtual worlds virtual travel use case metaverse1 project. J. Virtual Worlds Res. 2011, 4, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, T.; Chen, Y. Will virtual reality be a double-edged sword? Exploring the moderation effects of the expected enjoyment of a destination on travel intention. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2019, 12, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishna, A.; Morrin, M.; Sayin, E. Smellizing cookies and salivating: A focus on olfactory imagery. J. Consum. Res. 2014, 41, 18–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Israel, K.; Zerres, C.; Tscheulin, D.K. Presenting hotels in virtual reality: Does it influence the booking intention? J. Hosp. Tour. 2019, 10, 443–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marasco, A. Beyond virtual cultural tourism: History-living experiences with cinematic virtual reality. Tour. Herit. 2020, 2, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hultman, M.; Skarmeas, D.; Oghazi, P.; Beheshti, H.M. Achieving tourist loyalty through destination personality, satisfaction, and identification. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 2227–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeh, C.H.; Wang, Y.S.; Li, H.T.; Lin, S.Y. The effect of information presentation modes on tourists’ responses in Internet marketing: The moderating role of emotions. J. Travel. Tour. Mark. 2017, 34, 1018–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Jung, T.H.; Tom Dieck, M.C.; Chung, N. Experiencing immersive virtual reality in museums. Inf. Manag. J. 2020, 57, 103–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheong, R. The virtual threat to travel and tourism. Tour. Manag. 1995, 16, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moura, F.T.; Nobis, C.; Filho, S.C. Virtual reality and the decision making process of German senior travelers: A cross-media comparison. In CAUTHE 2017: Time for Big Ideas? Re-Thinking the Field for Tomorrow; Department of Tourism, University of Otago: Dunedin, New Zealand, 2017; pp. 619–622. Available online: https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.849643300162597 (accessed on 4 March 2020).
- Huang, Y.C.; Backman, S.J.; Backman, K.F. Exploring the impacts of involvement and flow experiences in Second Life on people’s travel intentions. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2012, 3, 4–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.C.; Backman, S.J.; Backman, K.F.; Moore, D. Exploring user acceptance of 3D virtual worlds in travel and tourism marketing. Tour. Manag. 2013, 36, 490–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prayag, G.; Hosany, S.; Odeh, K. The role of tourists’ emotional experiences and satisfaction in understanding behavioral intentions. JDMM 2013, 2, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.C.; Backman, K.F.; Backman, S.J.; Chang, L.L. Exploring the implications of virtual reality technology in tourism marketing: An integrated research framework. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2016, 18, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tussyadiah, I.P.; Wang, D.; Jia, C.H. Exploring the persuasive power of virtual reality imagery for destination marketing. TTRA Adv. Tour. Res. Glob. 2016, 25. Available online: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/ttra/2016/Academic_Papers_Oral/25 (accessed on 27 February 2020).
- Griffin, T.; Giberson, J.; Lee, S.H.M.; Guttentag, D.; Kandaurova, M.; Sergueeva, K.; Dimanche, F. Virtual reality and implications for destination marketing. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual TTRA 2017, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 20–22 June 2017; Available online: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/ttra/2017/Academic_Papers_Oral/29 (accessed on 4 March 2020).
- Flavián, C.; Ibáñez-Sánchez, S.; Orús, C. Integrating Virtual Reality Devices into the Body: Effects of Technological Embodiment on Customer Engagement and Behavioral Intentions toward the Destination. J. Travel. Tour. Mark. 2019, 36, 847–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, T.; Chung, N.; Leue, M.C. The determinants of recommendations to use augmented reality technologies: The case of a Korean theme park. Tour. Manag. 2015, 49, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rauschnabel, P.A.; Ro, Y.K. Augmented reality smart glasses: An investigation of technology acceptance drivers. Int. J. Technol. Mark. 2016, 11, 123–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cowan, K.; Ketron, S. A dual model of product involvement for effective virtual reality: The roles of imagination, co-creation, telepresence, and interactivity. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 100, 483–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marasco, A.; Buonincontri, P.; Van Niekerk, M.; Orlowski, M.; Okumus, F. Exploring the role of next-generation virtual technologies in destination marketing. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2018, 9, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, J.E.M. The role of promotional touristic videos in the creation of visit intent to Barcelona. Int. J. Sci. Manag. Tour. 2017, 3, 463–490. [Google Scholar]
- Pasanen, K.; Pesonen, J.; Murphy, J.; Heinonen, J.; Mikkonen, J. Comparing tablet and virtual reality glasses for watching nature tourism videos. In Proceedings of the Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2019: Proceedings of the International Conference, Nicosia, Cyprus, 30 January–1 February 2019; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland; pp. 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, T.; Tung, V.W.S. The impact of tourism mini-movies on destination image: The influence of travel motivation and advertising disclosure. J. Travel. Tour. Mark. 2017, 34, 416–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leung, D.; Dickinger, A.; Nixon, L. Impact of destination promotion videos on perceived destination image and booking intention change. In Proceedings of the Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2017: Proceedings of the International Conference, Rome, Italy, 24–26 January 2017; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland; pp. 361–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.C.; Chang, Y.C. What drives purchase intention on Airbnb? Perspectives of consumer reviews, information quality, and media richness. Telemat. Inform. 2018, 35, 1512–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.J.; Lee, C.K.; Jung, T. Exploring consumer behavior in virtual reality tourism using an extended stimulus-organism-response model. J. Travel. Res. 2020, 59, 69–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daft, R.; Lengel, R. Information Richness: A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design; Staw, B.M., Cummings, L.L., Eds.; Research in Organizational Behavior (vol. 6); JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, USA, 1984; pp. 191–233. [Google Scholar]
- Vazquez, D.; Dennis, C.; Zhang, Y. Understanding the effect of smart retail brand–Consumer communications via mobile instant messaging (MIM)—An empirical study in the Chinese context. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 77, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gimpel, H.; Huber, J.; Sarikaya, S. Customer satisfaction in digital service encounters: The role of media richness, social presence, and cultural distance. In Proceedings of the 24th ECIS 2016, Istanbul, Turkey, 12–15 June 2016; Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2016_rp/91 (accessed on 19 September 2022).
- Kahai, S.S.; Cooper, R.B. Exploring the core concepts of media richness theory: The impact of cue multiplicity and feedback immediacy on decision quality. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2003, 20, 263–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kandaurova, M.; Lee, S.H.M. The effects of Virtual Reality (VR) on charitable giving: The role of empathy, guilt, responsibility, and social exclusion. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 100, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Novak, T.P.; Hoffman, D.L.; Yung, Y.F. Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Mark. Sci. 2000, 19, 22–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minsky, M. Telepresence. OMNI Magazine, June 1980; pp. 44–52. [Google Scholar]
- Hoffman, D.L.; Novak, T.P. Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. J. Mark. 1996, 60, 50–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Novak, T.P.; Hoffman, D.L.; Duhachek, A. The influence of goal-directed and experiential activities on online flow experiences. J. Consum. Psychol. 2003, 13, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouvier, P. La présence en réalité virtuelle, une approche centrée utilisateur. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris-Est, Paris, France, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Coyle, J.R.; Thorson, E. The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. J. Advert. 2001, 30, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suh, K.S.; Chang, S. User interfaces and consumer perceptions of online stores: The role of telepresence. Behav. Inf. 2006, 25, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keng, C.J.; Lin, H.Y. Impact of telepresence levels on internet advertising effects. CyberPsychol. Behav. 2006, 9, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slater, M.; Usoh, M. Representations systems, perceptual position, and presence in immersive virtual environments. Presence 1993, 2, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klein, L.R. Creating virtual product experiences: The role of telepresence. J. Interact. Mark. 2003, 17, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debbabi, S.; Daassi, M.; Baile, S. Effect of online 3D advertising on consumer responses: The mediating role of telepresence. J. Mark. Manag. 2010, 26, 967–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Z.; Benbasat, I. Research note—Investigating the influence of the functional mechanisms of online product presentations. Inf. Syst. Res. 2007, 18, 454–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evrard, Y.; Pras, B.; Roux, E. Market: Etudes et Recherches en Marketing, 3rd ed.; Dunod: Paris, France, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Ahn, S.J.; Le, A.M.T.; Bailenson, J. The effect of embodied experiences on self-other merging, attitude, and helping behavior. Media Psychol. 2013, 16, 7–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burkhardt, J.M. Réalité virtuelle et ergonomie: Quelques apports réciproques. Trav. Hum. 2003, 661, 65–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witmer, B.G.; Singer, M.J. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence 1998, 7, 225–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slater, M.; Usoh, M.; Steed, A. Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence 1994, 3, 130–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schubert, T.; Friedmann, F.; Regenbrecht, H. The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence 2001, 10, 266–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosenbloom, A. A game experience in every application. Commun. ACM 2003, 46, 28–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carù, A.; Cova, B. Approche empirique de l’immersion dans l’expérience de consommation: Les opérations d’appropriation. Rech. Appl. Mark. 2003, 18, 47–65. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40589366 (accessed on 9 March 2020). [CrossRef]
- Fornerino, M.; Helme-Guizon, A.; Gotteland, D. Expériences cinématographiques en état d’immersion: Effet sur la satisfaction. RAM 2008, 23, 95–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debbabi, S.; Baile, S.; Des Garets, V.; Roehrich, G. L’impact de la téléprésence dans une publicité en ligne sur la formation de l’attitude à l’égard du produit: Pertinence de l’approche traditionnelle par l’expérience. RAM 2013, 28, 3–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benford, S.; Greenhalgh, C.; Rodden, T.; Pycock, J. Collaborative virtual environments. Commun. ACM 2001, 44, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Adaval, R.; Steinhart, Y.; Wyer, R.S., Jr. Imagining yourself in the scene: The interactive effects of goal-driven self-imagery and visual perspectives on consumer behavior. J. Consum. Res. 2014, 41, 418–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicoletta, R.; Servidio, R. Tourists’ opinions and their selection of tourism destination images: An affective and motivational evaluation. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2012, 4, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franceschi, K.; Lee, R.M.; Zanakis, S.H.; Hinds, D. Engaging group e-learning in virtual worlds. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2009, 26, 73–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saunders, C.; Rutkowski, A.F.; von Genuchten, M.; Vogel, D.; Orrego, J.M. Virtual space and place: Theory and test. MIS Q. 2011, 35, 1079–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skard, S.; Knudsen, E.S.; Sjåstad, H.; Thorbjørnsen, H. How virtual reality influences travel intentions: The role of mental imagery and happiness forecasting. Tour. Manag. 2021, 87, 104–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Kerrebroeck, H.; Brengman, M.; Willems, K. Escaping the crowd: An experimental study on the impact of a Virtual Reality experience in a shopping mall. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 77, 437–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, X.; Unnava, H.R.; Lee, H. “Too true to be good?” when virtual reality decreases interest in actual reality. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 100, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fox, J.; Christy, K.R.; Vang, M.H. The experience of presence in persuasive virtual environments. In Interacting with Presence: HCI and the Sense of Presence in Computer-Mediated Environments; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 164–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, W.A.; Carey, S. Actual/Virtual Visits: What Are the Links. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Museums and the Web, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 13–17 April 2005; Available online: http://www.archimuse.com/mw2005/papers/thomas/thomas.html (accessed on 11 June 2020).
- Alyahya, M.; McLean, G. Examining tourism consumers’ attitudes and the role of sensory information in virtual reality experiences of a tourist destination. J. Travel. Res. 2021, 61, 1666–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hopkins, C.D.; Raymond, M.A.; Mitra, A. Consumer responses to perceived telepresence in the online advertising environment: The moderating role of involvement. Mark. Theory 2004, 4, 137–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, W.; Gretzel, U. Designing persuasive destination websites: A mental imagery processing perspective. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 1270–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burns, A.C.; Biswas, A.; Babin, L.A. The operation of visual imagery as a mediator of advertising effects. J. Advert. 1993, 22, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, D.W.; Stoica, M. Comparing the effects of a photograph versus artistic renditions of a beach scene in a direct-response print ad for a Caribbean resort island: A mental imagery perspective. J. Vacat. Mark. 2004, 10, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gavilan, D.; Avello, M.; Abril, C. The mediating role of mental imagery in mobile advertising. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2014, 34, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Chan, H.C. Touching products virtually: Facilitating consumer mental imagery with gesture control and visual presentation. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2019, 36, 823–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phillips, W.J.; Asperin, A.; Wolfe, K. Investigating the effect of country image and subjective knowledge on attitudes and behaviors: US Upper Midwesterners’ intentions to consume Korean Food and visit Korea. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2013, 32, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, T.H.; Lee, H.; Chung, N.; tom Dieck, M.C. Cross-cultural differences in adopting mobile augmented reality at cultural heritage tourism sites. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 30, 1621–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Stepchenkova, S. Effect of tourist photographs on attitudes towards destination: Manifest and latent content. Tour. Manag. 2015, 49, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pine, B.J.; Gilmore, J.H. Welcome to the experience economy. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1998, 76, 97–105. [Google Scholar]
- Sussmann, S.; Vanhegan, H. Virtual Reality and the Tourism Product. Substitution or complement? ECIS 2000 Proc. 2000, 117. Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2000/117 (accessed on 14 August 2022).
- Disztinger, P.; Schlögl, S.; Groth, A. Technology acceptance of virtual reality for travel planning. In Proceedings of the Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2017: Proceedings of the International Conference, Rome, Italy, 24–26 January 2017; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland; pp. 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemon, K.N.; Verhoef, P.C. Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. J. Mark. 2016, 80, 69–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, L.; Jang, S. Investigating the routes of communication on destination websites. J. Travel. Res. 2012, 51, 94–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.Y.; Li, H.; Edwards, S.M. The effect of 3-D product visualisation on the strength of brand attitude. Int. J. Advert. 2012, 31, 377–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schlosser, A.E.; Mick, D.G.; Deighton, J. Experiencing products in the virtual world: The role of goal and imagery in influencing attitudes versus purchase intentions. J. Consum. Res. 2003, 30, 184–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spears, N.; Singh, S.N. Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 2004, 26, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byrne, B.M. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- George, D.; Mallery, P. Windows Step by Step: A Simple Study Guide and Reference; GEN; Pearson Education, Inc.: Boston, MA, USA, 2010; Volume 10, pp. 152–165. [Google Scholar]
- Harman, H.H. Modern Factor Analysis; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mueller, R.O.; Hancock, G.R. Factor Analysis and Latent Structure: Confirmatory Factor Analysis; Smelser, N.J., Baltes, P.B., Eds.; IESBS: Sydney, Australia, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd ed.; Guilford: New York, NY, USA, 2005; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
- Byrne, B.M. Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming; Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 2010; Available online: https://www.drnishikantjha.com/papersCollection/Multivariate%20Data%20Analysis.pdf (accessed on 7 September 2023).
- Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Preacher, K.J.; Hayes, A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 2008, 40, 879–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Park, M.; Yoo, J. Effects of perceived interactivity of augmented reality on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 52, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibson, A.; O’Rawe, M. Virtual Reality as a Travel Promotional Tool: Insights from a Consumer Travel Fair. Augment. Real. Virtual Real. 2018, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yung, R.; Khoo-Lattimore, C.; Potter, L.E. Virtual reality and tourism marketing: Conceptualizing a framework on presence, emotion, and intention. Curr. Issues Tour. 2021, 24, 1505–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Massidda, C.; Etzo, I. The determinants of Italian domestic tourism: A panel data analysis. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mittal, A.; Bhandari, H.; Chand, P.K. Anticipated positive evaluation of social media posts: Social return, revisit intention, recommend intention and mediating role of memorable tourism experience. Int. J. Cult. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2022, 16, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, P.; Jhamb, D.; Yu, L. Measuring service quality perceptions of hotel management institutes on hotel recruiters’ hiring intentions: Effect of sacrifice, satisfaction and service value. J. Teach. Travel. Tour. 2023, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ertz, M.; Tandon, U.; Quenum, G.G.Y.; Salem, M.; Sun, S. Consumers’ coping strategies when they feel negative emotions in the face of forced deconsumption during the Covid-19 pandemic lockdowns. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tandon, U.; Ertz, M. Customer satisfaction towards online shopping by empirical validation of self-determination theory. In Handbook of Research on the Platform Economy and the Evolution of E-Commerce; Ertz, D.M., Ed.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 177–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tzeng, S.-Y.; Ertz, M.; Jo, M.-S.; Sarigöllü, E. Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction on Online Shopping Holiday. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2021, 39, 516–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Themes Raised | Number of Citations a | Number of Citations b |
---|---|---|
Theme: the VR visit experience
| 13 6 31 20 4 10 19 | 4 2 22 17 2 0 19 |
Constructs | Mean | St. Deviation | Skewness | Kurtosis |
---|---|---|---|---|
Presence | 3.9606 | 0.84303 | −1.631 | 1.631 |
Immersion | 4.0350 | 0.85963 | −1.472 | 1.605 |
Realism | 4.1869 | 0.75255 | −1.478 | 2.018 |
Mental imagery | 3.4525 | 1.21256 | −0.683 | −0.934 |
Attitude | 3.6075 | 0.49592 | −0.558 | 2.452 |
Actual visit intention | 3.9550 | 0.95989 | −1.301 | 0.533 |
Presence | Immersion | Realism | Mental Imagery | Attitude | Actual Visit Intention | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Early respondents | ||||||
Mean | 3.915 | 3.993 | 4.248 | 4.119 | 3.567 | 3.902 |
Std. Deviation | 0.810 | 0.880 | 0.774 | 0.803 | 0.461 | 0.988 |
Late respondents | ||||||
Mean | 4.060 | 4.108 | 4.272 | 4.123 | 3.696 | 4.072 |
Std. Deviation | 0.787 | 0.832 | 0.734 | 0.778 | 0.553 | 0.882 |
Demographic Characteristics (N = 400) | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 163 | 40.8 |
Female | 237 | 59.2 |
Age | ||
18–25 | 30 | 7.5 |
26–35 | 152 | 38.0 |
36–45 | 178 | 44.5 |
45–55 | 37 | 9.3 |
More than 55 | 3 | .8 |
Status | ||
Single | 154 | 38.5 |
Widowed | 4 | 1.0 |
Divorced | 18 | 4.5 |
Married with children | 128 | 32.0 |
Married without children | 96 | 24.0 |
Profession | ||
Farmer | 17 | 4.3 |
Intermediary occupation | 16 | 4.0 |
Employee | 278 | 69.5 |
Worker | 56 | 14.0 |
Jobseeker | 33 | 8.3 |
Income (in Tunisian Dinars [TND], TND 1 = USD 0.33) | ||
Without income | 33 | 8.3 |
500–1000 TND | 84 | 21.0 |
1000–1500 TND | 251 | 62.8 |
1500–2000 TND | 32 | 8.0 |
How often do you travel for tourism purposes? | ||
Once a year | 214 | 53.5 |
Twice a year | 143 | 35.75 |
More than twice a year | 43 | 10.75 |
Have you visited a tourist destination using VR technology? | ||
Yes | 39 | 9.75 |
No | 361 | 90.25 |
Items | Std. Estimate | Std. Error | Critical Ratio | AVE | CR | Cronbach’s Alpha | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Presence | PRS1 | 0.851 | |||||
PRS2 | 0.829 | 0.045 | 21.09 | 0.731 | 0.916 | 0.915 | |
PRS5 | 0.872 | 0.047 | 23.056 | ||||
PRS6 | 0.867 | 0.045 | 22.817 | ||||
Immersion | IMM1 | 0.859 | |||||
IMM2 | 0.862 | 0.038 | 22.602 | 0.754 | 0.897 | 0.892 | |
IMM4 | 0.868 | 0.037 | 22.862 | ||||
Realism | REL1 | 0.879 | |||||
REL2 | 0.835 | 0.042 | 21.543 | 0.635 | 0.873 | 0.851 | |
REL3 | 0.768 | 0.045 | 18.63 | ||||
REL4 | 0.692 | 0.047 | 15.972 | ||||
Mental Imagery | IMG1 | 0.913 | |||||
IMG2 | 0.876 | 0.04 | 26.145 | 0.818 | 0.931 | 0.927 | |
IMG3 | 0.924 | 0.043 | 29.143 | ||||
Attitude | ATT1 | 0.813 | |||||
ATT2 | 0.692 | 0.073 | 13.165 | ||||
ATT3 | 0.682 | 0.08 | 10.98 | 0.515 | 0.806 | 0.796 | |
ATT4 | 0.676 | 0.078 | 9.849 | ||||
Visit intentions | ITV1 | 0.832 | |||||
ITV2 | 0.934 | 0.05 | 24.272 | 0.776 | 0.912 | 0.906 | |
ITV3 | 0.874 | 0.056 | 21.931 | ||||
CMIN/DF = 4.963, GFI = 0.901, NFI = 0.898, IFI = 0.913, TLI = 0.897, CFI = 0.912, RMSEA = 0.08 |
Presence | Immersion | Realism | Mental Imagery | Attitude | Visit Intentions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Presence | 0.854 | |||||
Immersion | 0.704 a | 0.868 | ||||
Realism | 0.713 a | 0.672 a | 0.796 | |||
Mental imagery | 0.533 a | 0.464 a | 0.470 a | 0.904 | ||
Attitude | 0.550 a | 0.558 a | 0.619 a | 0.328 a | 0.717 | |
Visit intentions | 0.703 a | 0.652 a | 0.704 a | 0.532 a | 0.568 a | 0.880 |
Hypothesized Relationships | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | p-Value | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Presence → Telepresence | 0.944 * | ||||
Immersion → Telepresence | 0.907 | 0.03 | 32.161 | *** | |
Realism → Telepresence | 0.867 | 0.029 | 28.148 | *** | |
Telepresence → Mental imagery | 0.555 | 0.067 | 12.599 | *** | Support |
Telepresence → Attitude | 0.623 | 0.026 | 14.871 | *** | Support |
Mental imagery → Visit intentions | 0.388 | 0.031 | 9.935 | *** | Support |
Attitude → visit intentions | 0.568 | 0.080 | 13.795 | *** | Support |
Telepresence → Visit intentions | 0.845 | 0.039 | 26.355 | *** | Support |
CMIN/DF = 4.682, GFI = 0.961, NFI = 0.957, IFI = 0.983, TLI = 0.967, CFI = 0.985, RMSEA = 0.068 |
Bootstrapping Bias Corrected 95% Confidence Interval N = 2000 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | Hypotheses | Direct Effect β | Indirect Effect β | p-Value | Mediation Type | ||
H6 | Telepresence → Mental imagery → Visit intentions | 0.544 | 0.0594 | 0.001 | Partial mediation | ||
H7 | Telepresence → Attitude → Visit intention. | 0.589 | 0.0708 | 0.001 | Partial mediation | ||
CMIN/DF = 1.741, GFI = 0.971, NFI = 0.994, IFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.974, CFI = 0.978, RMSEA = 0.048 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ouerghemmi, C.; Ertz, M.; Bouslama, N.; Tandon, U. The Impact of Virtual Reality (VR) Tour Experience on Tourists’ Intention to Visit. Information 2023, 14, 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14100546
Ouerghemmi C, Ertz M, Bouslama N, Tandon U. The Impact of Virtual Reality (VR) Tour Experience on Tourists’ Intention to Visit. Information. 2023; 14(10):546. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14100546
Chicago/Turabian StyleOuerghemmi, Chourouk, Myriam Ertz, Néji Bouslama, and Urvashi Tandon. 2023. "The Impact of Virtual Reality (VR) Tour Experience on Tourists’ Intention to Visit" Information 14, no. 10: 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14100546
APA StyleOuerghemmi, C., Ertz, M., Bouslama, N., & Tandon, U. (2023). The Impact of Virtual Reality (VR) Tour Experience on Tourists’ Intention to Visit. Information, 14(10), 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14100546