Using ML to Predict User Satisfaction with ICT Technology for Educational Institution Administration
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Addressing the gaps in earlier research on identifying and analysing ICT user satisfaction for administration tasks in educational businesses, which has been limited and inconclusive.
- Providing insights into the key factors that impact user satisfaction in ICT administrative (business) systems.
- Enabling organisations to make data-driven decisions to improve their ICT systems, better meet user needs and expectations, maximise labour efforts while minimising resources, and identify potential issues earlier.
2. Related Work
2.1. ICT for Administration Tasks in Educational Organisations
2.2. User Satisfaction with ICT Systems
2.3. Machine Learning Models for ICT
3. Research Problem Formulation
- L number of attributes related to staff’s view about ICT systems aspects in an educational organisation
- X, where X is a vector of length L, represents the factors.
- Find that is a model to map X to Y where that shows the user satisfaction indicator.
- Decide the most influential factors that affect the user satisfaction.
- RQ1: What is the distribution of users’ satisfaction towards ICT systems at educational organisations in Saudi Arabia?
- RQ2: How can ML models aid in predicting users’ satisfaction towards ICT systems at educational organisations in Saudi Arabia?
- RQ3: What factors influence users’ satisfaction toward ICT systems at educational organisations in Saudi Arabia?
4. Methodology
4.1. Dataset Collection
Dataset Validity and Reliability Measures
- Cronbach’s Alpha: Cronbach’s alpha is a widely recognised statistical measure for evaluating the internal consistency reliability of a research instrument. It gauges the degree of inter-relatedness among the items on the instrument, ensuring that they collectively produce consistent outcomes. In this study, Cronbach’s alpha was computed as part of the initial analysis to ascertain the dataset’s consistency and validity. The value obtained for the survey instrument was 0.894, significantly surpassing the commonly accepted threshold of 0.7, indicating a high level of internal consistency [42,43].
- Split-Half Method: To further validate the reliability of the survey, the Split-Half Method was utilised, resulting in a reliability coefficient of 0.86. This corroborates the internal consistency of the survey items, reinforcing the reliability of the instrument [44].
- Exploratory Factor Analysis: This analysis was conducted to assess the construct validity of the survey. It verified the aggregation of the survey items into coherent factors, consistent with the theoretical constructs being measured. The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was determined to be 0.82, and the Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was significant (p < 0.001), indicating the suitability of the data for factor analysis [45,46].
4.2. Prediction Calculation
- RF is an ensemble learning method that constructs multiple decision trees at training time and outputs the class that is the mode of the classes (classification) or the mean prediction (regression) of the individual trees. We used an RF model with 100 trees and the ‘entropy’ criterion to measure the quality of a split.
- CBC, advantageous for its handling of categorical data, is utilised with default parameters but with a specific focus on depth optimisation (depth = 6) to ensure model complexity was balanced against its predictive accuracy.
- The DT model is used with the default parameters. The entropy function was used for determining the best split at each node, aiming to maximise information gain.
- KNN is a nonparametric classification algorithm that classifies a new instance based on its closest neighbours in the training dataset. In this study, the ‘brute’ method is employed with three neighbours in the KNN model. The ‘brute’ algorithm calculates distances between all pairs of data points, which is particularly suitable for small datasets. Interestingly, the accuracy of this model reached its peak performance when utilising three neighbours; any deviation from this number resulted in noticeably lower classification results.
- SVM is a binary classification algorithm that finds a hyperplane in a high-dimensional space that maximally separates the two classes. We used an SVM model with a radial basis function kernel and a regularisation parameter of 1.0. This kernel is commonly used in SVMs for nonlinear classification problems, while the regularisation parameter controls the balance between model complexity and error.
- The RC model is employed primarily for its efficiency and simplicity, with an alpha parameter of 1.0 to control model complexity through regularisation.
- LR is applied with an L2 penalty and a regularisation strength of 1.0, providing a solid foundation for modelling binary outcomes and examining the influence of individual predictors.
- The GPC model is chosen for its flexibility and nonparametric nature, using a default radial basis function kernel. This model excels in providing probabilistic predictions, which are invaluable for understanding prediction confidence levels.
- NB is a probabilistic classification algorithm that uses Bayes’ theorem to predict the probability of a target variable. The used implementation for the NB is with a variance smoothing parameter of 1 . The variance smoothing parameter is used to avoid probabilities of zero in cases where the variance of the predictors is zero.
- An ANN model is a type of neural network that consists of multiple layers of interconnected nodes; it has the potential to learn complex nonlinear relationships between input and output variables. This model is used with three hidden layers of ten nodes each, as well as the ‘tanh’ activation function. Also, in this model, the batch size is 32, with early stopping and the ‘Adam’ solver with an ‘adaptive’ learning rate.
4.3. Prediction Analysis
- Global Interpretability: This provides an overview of the importance of each feature across all predictions. It helps in understanding the overall impact of different features on user satisfaction.
- Local Interpretability: This offers insights into the contribution of each feature to individual predictions. It enables a detailed analysis of how specific features influence the satisfaction level of individual users.
5. Results and Discussion
5.1. Distribution of User Satisfaction
5.2. Predictive Power of ML Models
5.3. Factors Influencing User Satisfaction
5.3.1. Correlation Analysis
5.3.2. Interpreting Model Results with SHAP
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Fields | Discerption of the Measurement |
---|---|
Q1 | What is your gender? |
Q2 | What is your education level? |
Q3 | What is your role? |
Fields | Discerption of the Measurement |
---|---|
Q1 | The currently provided ICT systems maintain the users’ privacy. |
Q2 | You need to use third-party software. |
Q3 | Your performance of tasks has been negatively affected when using the systems and programs provided by the Ministry of Education due to the Internet connection. |
Q4 | The systems and programs provided by the Ministry of Education are safe to use. |
Q5 | The systems and programs provided by the Ministry of Education are characterised by an easy-to-use interface. |
Fields | Discerption of the Measurement |
---|---|
Q1 | You get enough training to use current ICT systems. |
Q2 | Previous experiences have helped you in dealing with programs and systems provided by the Ministry of Education. |
Fields | Discerption of the Measurement |
---|---|
Q1 | Your performance in completing administrative tasks has been negatively affected due to IT support. |
Q2 | Your performance in completing tasks has been negatively affected due to the lack or delay in proper periodic maintenance of equipment, devices and systems provided by the Ministry of Education. |
Fields | Discerption of the Measurement |
---|---|
Q1 | The current ICT systems help you for the internal communication. |
Q2 | The systems and programs provided by the Ministry of Education have helped you for the external communication. |
References
- Almaghrabi, H.; Li, A.; Soh, B. IiCE: A Proposed System Based on IoTaaS to Study Administrative Efficiency in Primary Schools. In Proceedings of the IoT as a Service: 7th EAI International Conference, IoTaaS 2021, Sydney, Australia, 13–14 December 2021; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 121–138. [Google Scholar]
- Hoque, K.E.; Samad, R.S.A.; Siraj, S.; Ziyadh, A. The Role of ICT in school management of Maldives. CzesŁAw Kupisiewicz 2012, 270, 270–282. [Google Scholar]
- Honka, A.; Kaipainen, K.; Hietala, H.; Saranummi, N. Rethinking health: ICT-enabled services to empower people to manage their health. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2011, 4, 119–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Perego, A.; Perotti, S.; Mangiaracina, R. ICT for logistics and freight transportation: A literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2011, 41, 457–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoque, K.E.; Razak, A.Z.A.; Zohora, M.F. ICT utilization among school teachers and principals in Malaysia. Int. J. Acad. Res. Progress. Educ. Dev. 2012, 1, 17–34. [Google Scholar]
- Samuel, R.; Bakar, Z. The utilization and integration of ICT tools in promoting English language teaching and learning: Reflections from English option teachers in Kuala Langat District, Malaysia. Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using ICT 2006, 2, 4–14. [Google Scholar]
- Fernández-Gutiérrez, M.; Gimenez, G.; Calero, J. Is the use of ICT in education leading to higher student outcomes? Analysis from the Spanish Autonomous Communities. Comput. Educ. 2020, 157, 103969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, I.H. The effect of principals’ technological leadership on teachers’ technological literacy and teaching effectiveness in Taiwanese elementary schools. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2012, 15, 328–340. [Google Scholar]
- Vanderlinde, R.; Van Braak, J.; Tondeur, J. Using an online tool to support school-based ICT policy planning in primary education. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 2010, 26, 434–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Passey, D. ICT and School management: A Review of Selected Literature; Lancaster University, Department of Educational Research: Lancaster, UK, 2002; Volume 16, p. 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Eremie, I.; Agi, U.K. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Skills and Efficient Management of Educational Resources in Public Secondary Schools. J. Int. Soc. Teach. Educ. 2020, 24, 36–47. [Google Scholar]
- Anshari, M.; Syafrudin, M.; Fitriyani, N.L. Fourth industrial revolution between knowledge management and digital humanities. Information 2022, 13, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almalki, G.; Williams, N. A strategy to improve the usage of ICT in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia primary school. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2012, 3, 42–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bright, A.A.; Asare, G. The impact of management information system on University of Education Winneba, Kumasi Campus-Ghana. Eur. J. Res. Reflect. Manag. Sci. 2019, 7, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, Y.; Janssen, M.; Wang, R.; Liu, Y. It is me, chatbot: Working to address the COVID-19 outbreak-related mental health issues in China. User experience, satisfaction, and influencing factors. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2022, 38, 1182–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhayani, B.; Abbas, S.T.; Khutar, D.Z.; Mohammed, H.J. Best ways computation intelligent of face cyber attacks. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 3, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brannigan, N.; Brannigan, N. Enhancing Leadership Capacity in ICTs in Education through technology enabled collaboration. Retrieved 2010, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Prokopiadou, G. Using information and communication technologies in school administration: Researching Greek kindergarten schools. Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh. 2012, 40, 305–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalid, M.S.; Nyvang, T. A change agent’s facilitation process for overcoming the barriers of ICT adoption for educational administration—The case of a rural-Bangladesh vocational institution. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 2014, 30, 547–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuhaib, H.; Muhammad, M. Efficient use of ICT in administration: A case from Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan. Int. J. Econ. Commer. Manag. 2016, 4, 540–550. [Google Scholar]
- Hayes, D.N. ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms. Comput. Educ. 2007, 49, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suleimen, N. Appraising the Attitude towards Information Communication Technology Integration and Usage in Kazakhstani Higher Education Curriculum. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. 2019, 18, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitomo, H. Utilization of ICT in elementary and secondary education in Japan: Its policies and effects. Telecommun. Policies Jpn. 2020, 1, 239–266. [Google Scholar]
- Ghavifekr, S.; Afshari, M.; Siraj, S.; Seger, K. ICT application for administration and management: A conceptual review. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 103, 1344–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 10004:2012; Quality Management—Customer Satisfaction—Guidelines for Monitoring and Measuring. International Standard; International Organization for Standardization: London, UK, 2018.
- Biesok, G.; Wyród-Wróbel, J. Customer satisfaction-Meaning and methods of measuring. In Marketing and Logistic Problems in the Management of Organization; Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Techniczno-Humanistycznej w Bielsku-Bialej: Bielsko-Biala, Poland, 2011; pp. 23–41. [Google Scholar]
- Kalankesh, L.R.; Nasiry, Z.; Fein, R.A.; Damanabi, S. Factors influencing user satisfaction with information systems: A systematic review. Galen Med. J. 2020, 9, e1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Z. How Canadian and Chinese high school students access and use ICT: An exploratory study. J. Educ. Technol. Dev. Exch. (JETDE) 2014, 7, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, A.A.; Mok, M.M.C.; Gu, X.; Spector, J.; Hai-Leng, C. ICT in higher education: An exploration of practices in Malaysian universities. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 16892–16908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanderlinde, R.; Aesaert, K.; Van Braak, J. Institutionalised ICT use in primary education: A multilevel analysis. Comput. Educ. 2014, 72, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- San, Y.Y.; Yew, M.P.; Mei, C.Y.; Pin, C.T. Exploring the Factors of Using Cloud Service in Malaysia Higher Education Institutions During COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak. Qeios 2024, 1, 7SZCV6. [Google Scholar]
- Qazdar, A.; Er-Raha, B.; Cherkaoui, C.; Mammass, D. A machine learning algorithm framework for predicting students performance: A case study of baccalaureate students in Morocco. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2019, 24, 3577–3589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojajuni, O.; Ayeni, F.; Akodu, O.; Ekanoye, F.; Adewole, S.; Ayo, T.; Misra, S.; Mbarika, V. Predicting student academic performance using machine learning. In Proceedings of the Computational Science and Its Applications—ICCSA 2021: 21st International Conference, Cagliari, Italy, 13–16 September 2021; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. Part IX 21. pp. 481–491. [Google Scholar]
- Fernandes, E.; Holanda, M.; Victorino, M.; Borges, V.; Carvalho, R.; Van Erven, G. Educational data mining: Predictive analysis of academic performance of public school students in the capital of Brazil. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 94, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hew, K.F.; Hu, X.; Qiao, C.; Tang, Y. What predicts student satisfaction with MOOCs: A gradient boosting trees supervised machine learning and sentiment analysis approach. Comput. Educ. 2020, 145, 103724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafiee, N.S.M.; Mutalib, S. Prediction of mental health problems among higher education student using machine learning. Int. J. Educ. Manag. Eng. (IJEME) 2020, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Verma, C.; Illés, Z. Attitude prediction towards ICT and mobile technology for the real-time: An experimental study using machine learning. In The International Scientific Conference Elearning and Software for Education; “Carol I” National Defence University: Bucharest, Romania, 2019; Volume 3, pp. 247–254. [Google Scholar]
- Panagiotakopoulos, T.; Kotsiantis, S.; Kostopoulos, G.; Iatrellis, O.; Kameas, A. Early dropout prediction in MOOCs through supervised learning and hyperparameter optimization. Electronics 2021, 10, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, P.; Singh, M.; Josan, G.S. Classification and prediction based data mining algorithms to predict slow learners in education sector. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2015, 57, 500–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, I.M.K.; Cheong, K.Y.; Weldon, A. Predicting student satisfaction of emergency remote learning in higher education during COVID-19 using machine learning techniques. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0249423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Afrin, F.; Rahaman, M.S.; Hamilton, M. Mining Student Responses to Infer Student Satisfaction Predictors. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2006.07860. [Google Scholar]
- Madaio, M.; Lasko, R.; Ogan, A.; Cassell, J. Using Temporal Association Rule Mining to Predict Dyadic Rapport in Peer Tutoring. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM), Wuhan, China, 25–28 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Bland, J.M.; Altman, D.G. Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 1997, 314, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vispoel, W.P.; Morris, C.A.; Kilinc, M. Using generalizability theory to disattenuate correlation coefficients for multiple sources of measurement error. Multivar. Behav. Res. 2018, 53, 481–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tabachnick, B.G.; Fidell, L.S.; Ullman, J.B. Using Multivariate Statistics; Pearson: Boston, MA, USA, 2013; Volume 6. [Google Scholar]
- Kaiser, H.F. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 1974, 39, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dake, D.K.; Buabeng-Andoh, C. Using Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Learner Drop-out Rate in Higher Educational Institutions. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2022, 2022, 2670562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chawla, N.V. Data mining for imbalanced datasets: An overview. In Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 875–886. [Google Scholar]
- Luan, H.; Tsai, C.C. A review of using machine learning approaches for precision education. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2021, 24, 250–266. [Google Scholar]
- Singla, S.; Feizi, S. Salient ImageNet: How to discover spurious features in Deep Learning? arXiv 2021, arXiv:2110.04301. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Y.W.; Zhou, Y.; Faghri, F.; Shaw, M.J.; Campbell, R.H. Analysis and prediction of unplanned intensive care unit readmission using recurrent neural networks with long short-term memory. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thaher, T.; Zaguia, A.; Al Azwari, S.; Mafarja, M.; Chantar, H.; Abuhamdah, A.; Turabieh, H.; Mirjalili, S.; Sheta, A. An enhanced evolutionary student performance prediction model using whale optimization algorithm boosted with sine-cosine mechanism. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Fan, J.; Sharma, A.; Kukkar, A. Data mining applications in university information management system development. J. Intell. Syst. 2022, 31, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Yun, Y.; An, R.; Cui, J.; Dai, H.; Shang, X. Educational data mining techniques for student performance prediction: Method review and comparison analysis. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 698490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arrieta, A.B.; Díaz-Rodríguez, N.; Del Ser, J.; Bennetot, A.; Tabik, S.; Barbado, A.; García, S.; Gil-López, S.; Molina, D.; Benjamins, R.; et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Inf. Fusion 2020, 58, 82–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galhotra, S.; Pradhan, R.; Salimi, B. Explaining black-box algorithms using probabilistic contrastive counterfactuals. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Management of Data, Xi’an, China, 11 June 2021; pp. 577–590. [Google Scholar]
- Habiba, U.; Ahmed, S.Z. ICT infrastructure and access to online services: Determining the factors affecting faculty satisfaction with university-subscribed resources. Int. Inf. Libr. Rev. 2020, 53, 112–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngwenyama, O.; Morawczynski, O. Factors affecting ICT expansion in emerging economies: An analysis of ICT infrastructure expansion in five Latin American countries. Inf. Technol. Dev. 2009, 15, 237–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacob, O.N.; Deborah, J.; Samuel, A.; Elizabeth, A.; Solomon, A.T. Administration of research programme in Nigerian public universities: Problems and way forward. Riwayat Educ. J. Hist. Humanit. 2020, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Dormann, M.; Hinz, S.; Wittmann, E. Improving school administration through information technology? How digitalisation changes the bureaucratic features of public school administration. Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh. 2019, 47, 275–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ifinedo, E.; Rikala, J.; Hämäläinen, T. Factors affecting Nigerian teacher educators’ technology integration: Considering characteristics, knowledge constructs, ICT practices and beliefs. Comput. Educ. 2020, 146, 103760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolaji, H.; Jimoh, H.A. Usability and utilization of ICT among educational administrators in secondary students in public school. Indones. J. Educ. Res. Technol. 2023, 3, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tokareva, E.A.; Smirnova, Y.V.; Orchakova, L.G. Innovation and communication technologies: Analysis of the effectiveness of their use and implementation in higher education. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2019, 24, 3219–3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panagiotarou, A.; Stamatiou, Y.C.; Pierrakeas, C.; Kameas, A. Gamification acceptance for learners with different E-skills. Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res. 2020, 19, 263–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marín, V.I.; Carpenter, J.P.; Tur, G. Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of social media data privacy policies. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2021, 52, 519–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sattaburuth, C.; Nilsook, P. Democratization of Information Technology Service for Higher Education Institutes. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 2022, 100, 2895–2904. [Google Scholar]
- Keržič, D.; Alex, J.K.; Pamela Balbontín Alvarado, R.; Bezerra, D.d.S.; Cheraghi, M.; Dobrowolska, B.; Fagbamigbe, A.F.; Faris, M.E.; França, T.; González-Fernández, B.; et al. Academic student satisfaction and perceived performance in the e-learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence across ten countries. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0258807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandal, S.; Khan, D.A. A Study of security threats in cloud: Passive impact of COVID-19 pandemic. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Smart Electronics and Communication (ICOSEC), Trichy, India, 10–12 September 2020; IEEE: New York, NY, USA; pp. 837–842. [Google Scholar]
- Apple, M.T.; Mills, D.J. Online teaching satisfaction and technostress at Japanese universities during emergency remote teaching. In Transferring Language Learning and Teaching from Face-to-Face to Online Settings; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez-Abitia, G.; Martínez-Pérez, S.; Ramirez-Montoya, M.S.; Lopez-Caudana, E. Digital gap in universities and challenges for quality education: A diagnostic study in Mexico and Spain. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belenko, V.; Klepikova, A.; Nemtsev, S.; Belenko, T. Innovative approaches in the educational process management of the university with the use of information and educational environment. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Innovative Approaches to the Application of Digital Technologies in Education, Stavropol, Russia, 12–13 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Xia, E.; Jia, W. Utilisation status and user satisfaction of online education platforms. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. (iJET) 2020, 15, 154–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolaji, H.; Adeoye, M.A. Accessibility, Usability, and Readiness Towards ICT Tools for Monitoring Educational Practice in Secondary Schools in Ilorin Metropolis. Indones. J. Multidiciplinary Res. 2022, 2, 257–264. [Google Scholar]
- Cidral, W.A.; Oliveira, T.; Di Felice, M.; Aparicio, M. E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Comput. Educ. 2018, 122, 273–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lethbridge, T.C. A survey of the relevance of computer science and software engineering education. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Software Engineering Education, Atlanta, GA, USA, 23–25 February 1998; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 1998; pp. 56–66. [Google Scholar]
ML Model | Application | Key Findings |
---|---|---|
Tree-based models e.g., Decision Trees (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and others | Predicting academic success [33]. Predicting academic success and user satisfaction [35]. Predicting students’ academic performance [34]. | Demonstrated high accuracy in predicting outcomes, comparable to SVM in certain contexts. Efficient in processing large datasets to accurately predict performance. |
Support Vector Machine (SVM) | Predicting academic success, user satisfaction, and mental health problems [36,37]. | Achieved high accuracy rates, outperforming other models in predicting students’ attitudes. |
Logistic Regression (LR) and Ridge Classifier (RC) | Predicting mental health problems [36]. predicting student dropout in a massive open online courses [38] | Commonly used alongside other models for varied predictive tasks. Simple and efficient. |
Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) | Predicting slow learners and user satisfaction during remote learning [39,40]. | Effective in identifying slow learners and predicting satisfaction with varying accuracy. |
k-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) | Analysing mental health issues among students [36]. | Accurately used for classifying user responses. |
Area of Investigation | Content of Investigation |
---|---|
Demographics | Gender, Education level, and Role |
Infrastructure | Privacy, Third-party, Internet connection, Security, and Usability |
Training | Training and Previous experience |
IT support | IT support and Maintenance |
Communication | Communication and Suggestions |
Variable | Measurement | Variable | Measurement |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Usability | ||
Education level | IT support | ||
Role | Maintenance | ||
Privacy | Training | ||
Third party | Previous experience | ||
Security | Communication | ||
Internet connection | Suggestion |
Gender | Male | Female | Prefer not to say | |||||
51% | 48% | 1% | ||||||
Education level | Primary school | Intermediate school | Secondary school | Diploma | Bachelor | Master | PhD | Other |
0.32% | 0.95% | 11.70% | 7.77% | 56.16% | 16.49% | 6.12% | 0.47% | |
Role | Principal | School Deputy-headmaster | Administrative Assistant | Teacher | Other | |||
8% | 5% | 17% | 59% | 11% |
Algorithm | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1-Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | RF | 94.902 | 94.068 | 94.872 | 94.468 |
2 | CBC | 94.118 | 92.500 | 94.872 | 93.671 |
3 | DT | 92.941 | 89.600 | 95.726 | 92.562 |
4 | KNN | 92.157 | 90.756 | 92.308 | 91.525 |
5 | SVM | 92.157 | 92.174 | 90.598 | 91.379 |
6 | RC | 91.765 | 90.000 | 92.308 | 91.139 |
7 | LR | 91.373 | 89.256 | 92.308 | 90.756 |
8 | GPC | 91.373 | 89.916 | 91.453 | 90.678 |
9 | NB | 90.588 | 88.430 | 91.453 | 89.916 |
10 | ANN | 90.196 | 90.351 | 88.034 | 89.177 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Almaghrabi, H.; Soh, B.; Li, A. Using ML to Predict User Satisfaction with ICT Technology for Educational Institution Administration. Information 2024, 15, 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15040218
Almaghrabi H, Soh B, Li A. Using ML to Predict User Satisfaction with ICT Technology for Educational Institution Administration. Information. 2024; 15(4):218. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15040218
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlmaghrabi, Hamad, Ben Soh, and Alice Li. 2024. "Using ML to Predict User Satisfaction with ICT Technology for Educational Institution Administration" Information 15, no. 4: 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15040218
APA StyleAlmaghrabi, H., Soh, B., & Li, A. (2024). Using ML to Predict User Satisfaction with ICT Technology for Educational Institution Administration. Information, 15(4), 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15040218