Next Article in Journal
Determinants of Humanities and Social Sciences Students’ Intentions to Use Artificial Intelligence Applications for Academic Purposes
Next Article in Special Issue
Digital Educational Tools for Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Review of Serious Games, Gamified Applications and Non-Gamified Virtual Reality Simulations/Tools for Nursing Students
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: AlJarrah et al. A Context-Aware Android Malware Detection Approach Using Machine Learning. Information 2022, 13, 563
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Ecosystem for the Provision of Digital Accessibility for People with Special Needs

1
Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, St. Cyril and St. Methodius University of Veliko Tarnovo, 5000 Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
3
Institute of Robotics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
4
Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with Ethnographic Museum, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Information 2024, 15(6), 315; https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060315
Submission received: 28 April 2024 / Revised: 15 May 2024 / Accepted: 20 May 2024 / Published: 28 May 2024

Abstract

:
Digital technologies occupy an important place in today’s developing world. They are also strongly related to new trends in educational technologies. In this context, the digital accessibility of this new environment for people with various special needs is of particular concern. A novel tool for assessment of the technological ecosystem, designed to provide digital accessibility to people with special needs, is described in the paper. The overall structure and the initial test of the system are discussed in the paper. The conceptual framework of the ecosystem and its ontological model are described. Special attention is paid to the accessibility of digital learning and e-learning for people with special needs from a robotic perspective.

1. Introduction

Digital technologies in the present day are interconnected globally, providing a dynamic environment to support the educational needs of any learner within novel technological ecosystems. A necessity of these technologies is them possessing emergent properties based on an understanding of disability as a discrepancy between a person’s goal and their available means (technological, social, cognitive or motivational) to achieve it [1].
World organizations such as the UN, the EU and state and international units continue to share good practices and recommendations on the use and implementation of strategies, policies and standards regarding people with special needs (PSN) and their participation in modern society (World report on vision [2]; Union of equality: Strategy on the rights of persons with disabilities 2021–2030 [3]; American Foundation For The Blind [4]).
According to the freely available data from Statista, as of 2020, Bulgaria is in 5th place out of 27 countries in the European ranking in terms of the share of people with vision loss according to the severity of the disability [5].
Since then, many steps have been taken to create conditions for the integration of PSN into and the participation of PSN in the modern economy and society, specifically people with visual impairments, such as:
  • The European Accessibility Act (EAA), which was adopted in 2019 and entered into force in June 2022.
  • Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021–2030, which provides a framework for promoting the rights of persons with disabilities, accessibility, equality and the participation of people with disabilities, including blind individuals.
  • Standards such as EN 301 549 [6] and EN 17161 [7], providing guidelines and requirements for the accessibility of ICT products and services, which are crucial for ensuring that digital platforms and technologies are usable by people with disabilities, including those who are blind or visually impaired, etc.
The paper discusses the current state of the research and the development of the informational ecosystem as a tool for the provision of digital support to preschool and adult learners with special needs, as well as its future applications. The present study proposes a conceptual framework for teaching through cloud-based, cyber-physical systems. The research is being conducted as part of the project “Digital Accessibility for People with Special Needs: Methodology, Conceptual Models and Innovative EcoSystems” (AB) [8]. The project length is three years: 2021–2024. It considers two target groups: preschool children with cognitive disabilities (6–7 years old) and adults with visual impairments (40–50 years old) in Bulgaria. Most of the authors have been involved from the beginning of the project, and a researcher with a disability is included. It provides a conceptual model of the social-oriented ecosystem with instruments that contain semantic mechanisms for providing and validating accessibility. The given model provides several levels of accessibility barriers, as it keeps the person at the center [9]. The first layer is that of human knowledge and motivation. There, the main barrier is called intrinsic since it is one based on the learner’s personal traits and is used when the information is derived from the web or any other repository. Various tools and tactics are adopted in order to increase learner motivation, such as robots to enhance motivation while acting as mediators of knowledge [9,10]. The sensor barrier to knowledge is faced using an array of different modalities such as 3D-printed objects, Braille keyboards, etc., as well as with volunteers aiding in improving knowledge accessibility [11]. Social–economic barriers, experienced according to the affordability of courses, devices, etc., required by PSN, are marked as an external layer [12].
The main contributions of the present study are related to the application of various technologies to ensure better digital accessibility for people with special needs:
  • Semantic technologies: A developed ontology of digital accessibility;
  • Digital technologies: Conceptual model of an experimental socially oriented ecosystem and information site;
  • Three-dimensional technologies/robotic technologies: Experiments, developed methodology and implementation;
  • Cloud technologies: Online tutorials and ecosystem modules;
  • Assistive technologies for people with disabilities.
More information about the project can be found on the project site [8].
This study examines current issues in digital accessibility for PSN, as the research was carried out within the framework of the AB project. In the Section 2 of the paper, a conceptual framework of a socially oriented AB ecosystem is presented. The ontological model of learning processes in the AB Ecosystem Tool is described in the Section 3. The Section 4 examines the accessibility of digital learning and e-learning for people with various special needs from a robotic perspective.

2. Conceptual Framework of the AB Ecosystem

Various models of semantic knowledge in the field of accessibility are being developed in the scientific community. Some of them emphasize the connectivity of accessible technologies and using them to overcome physical accessibility [13]. The interaction of accessible equipment and its adaptation to physical accessibility in specific cases are laid out in them [14]. As regards this point, Murillo-Morales and Miesenberger [15] use semantic technologies for affordable adaptation of digital images. In the same domain, the AB ecosystem adapts a variety of methods to provide greater semantic knowledge on accessibility.
Some of the studies propose methodologies that use semantic technologies to help accessible learning [16,17]. Most consider models of accessible knowledge presentation through lessons [18]. Some use semantic technologies to process learners’ responses and progress at a given stage in the education of people with disabilities [19,20].
The aim of this AB ecosystem is to assess the accessibility of digital resources after analysis [21]. The assessment considers accessibility for people with different needs, and in the case of an unsatisfactory assessment, various guidelines are indicated to deal with the barriers found.
The conceptual framework of the AB ecosystem consists of an ontology, on the one hand aiming to present key elements necessary for the creation of e-resources suitable for people with special visual needs and on the other hand aiming to provide guidance in the creation and maintenance of an e-platform containing such resources. The design of the AB site is ongoing. The objects in its structure are complemented by the team’s research on the current legislative framework and the ICT standards at the national and European levels when building digital resources for people with special educational needs.
The main objective of the AB project necessitates the creation and adaptation of optimal and applicable conceptual models for digital accessibility and learning in the field of accessibility. These models enhance and facilitate context-sensitive accessibility to digital resources and share knowledge in this domain in socially grounded ecosystems. Specialized training includes topics such as “what accessibility is and how to achieve it”, as well as teaching a variety of topics via cloud-based robotic systems to disadvantaged children. In Figure 1 is presented the conceptual structure of the AB system.
In the ecosystem, the main entities that will interact with the system are considered—software developers, teachers and learners. Contemporary trends in building electronic resources and/or platforms to help PSN are also reflected. The roles are also aligned with the hardware and software capabilities in creating and maintaining an e-platform and/or resources for visually disabled e-users.
From a user point of view, part of the conceptual structure of the system can give disabled people access to standards and regulations that are key to the social group under consideration, a space for discussion. In this space, it is appropriate to place information about legislative regulations at the national, European and international levels, including ways in which and means by which they can participate in the creation, discussion and voting of such citizens [22]. From an economic point of view, the subsection “Interact” enables the maintenance of up-to-date information for online users with visual disabilities, according to the following types of relationships:
  • C2C (Consumer-to-Consumer)—sharing and searching for useful information and experience through discussion forums and/or social networks; informing the public; feedback.
  • G2C and C2G (Government ↔ Consumer)—information to help the participation of interested parties in the processes of the integration of people with disabilities into the modern economy.
Digitization processes during the COVID-19 pandemic have shown the need for audio and audio–visual resources and assistive materials in teaching, in terms of general and specialized education, as well as lifelong learning.
The European Disability and Parking Card, valid in all member states, initiative is already underway, providing free access to some cultural and public institutions in the member states [23].
In the next section, the ontological structure for ensuring the educational processes in the AB system of Bulgarian citizens will be examined in more detail.

3. Conceptual Model of the Ontology Structure of Learning Processes in the AB Ecosystem Tool

An ontology is a formal explicit description of concepts in a domain of discourse called classes, with the properties of each concept describing various features and attributes of the concept and with restrictions on these properties [24].
The conceptual framework of the AB tool consists of an ontology reflecting the current need for a single online platform suitable for use by the blind in the country by using modern methods in the construction of an e-space and the relevant resources in it. The ontology describes the relations between the different domains of our accessibility knowledge base.
In Figure 2, the AB ontology is presented as a class hierarchy from the Protégé v.5.6.3 software environment. At the center of the ontology is the class Person. Individuals from this class represent the main types of ecosystem users. For the moment, these are learners (with possible disabilities, class Learner), developers of different software applications that are related to the ecosystem (class SoftwareDeveloper) and teachers involved in the educational process (class Teacher). Analogous to other similar electronic learning environments, the level of access of the individual here also depends on their position in the hierarchical structure. The following table describes the options for working with the system according to the role of the user (Table 1).
Here is a description in more detail of the main capabilities and interrelationships in the classes of the conceptual structure of the AB semantic hierarchy.
Using the class UserInterest, different types of interest topics and abilities of the users can be described in the ontology. An important part of the semantics is the class Disability. Its subclasses correspond to different types of disabilities considered in the research. Class Resource represents types of educational resources. There are classes in the ontology that represent documents classified as educational resources but that are also included in the ecosystem. These are all individuals in the subclasses of the class AccessibilityGuide. Resources can be referenced for individuals from the class Lesson, and all the lessons can be used for individuals from the class LearningCourse. The classes Robot and RobotType represent robots that can be used to assist the learning process.
In Figure 3 and Figure 4 are presented some of the data and object properties in the ontology.
The object property hasDisability and its subproperties assign list of disabilities to users. The property hasInterest assigns a list of interest to users. There are also object properties that represent relations between courses, lessons and resources. Guides, courses, lessons and resources can be classified in terms of their appropriateness for certain disabilities and interests (the property isProperFor and its subproperties). The object property isAssistedBy assigns a Robot object to concrete Course or Lesson.
In Figure 5, examples of individuals in the classes Learner, Teacher, Resource and Lesson are presented.
Although there are specialized hardware and software options available on the market for the blind (laptops, mobile devices, specialized keyboards, etc.), access to them is not guaranteed for every visually disabled person. In this regard, the conceptual ontology of accessibility covers the quantitative and qualitative indicators of a suitable interface of the site and the available ICT resources, according to the requirements of the recently adopted European guidelines and standards for the visually disabled (EU 2019/882 Directive [25] and EBU publication [26]).

4. Accessibility of Digital and e-Learning for PSN from a Robotic Perspective

A new conceptual model for the effective delivery of Internet-gathered knowledge to children/learners with special educational needs using humanoid robots is described in [9]. The experimental situation is similar to one of Piaget’s tests to overcome the so-called “intellectual egocentrism” at the age of about 7–8 years. In this framework, children learn to “see” the world through the eyes of another person in the room. This projection is equally transferable to the NAO robot. The child infers a mental picture of the robot depending on the facts about the robot witnessing an action or not. Therefore, the implementation of robots improves the accessibility of scientific (digitally represented) knowledge by making it memorable and enjoyable.
A framework for an educational technology ecosystem in inclusive classrooms: The implemented technological ecosystem allows inclusive education to take place outside of any modern constraints associated with schools, such as reliance on average test performance to determine progress, a lack of attention to the individual student’s subjective state or comfort in a class, a lack of adequate attention to students possibly being vulnerable due to pre-existing conditions, including sensory deficits and learning difficulties, etc.
One notable feature of such a school is the emphasis on cooperation rather than competition in the classroom and the encouragement of the talent and imagination of all children. However, this inclusive classroom of future professions will require a higher level of robotic autonomy on the one hand and a greater degree of orchestration of software performance outside the classroom—i.e., in the cloud. A possible framework for such cloud orchestration is provided in Figure 6. The scheme illustrates the potential of the technology ecosystem to support each individual student during a lesson in a teacher-coordinated way. In addition, this support can be equally beneficial to both slow and fast learners and learners with sensory deficits.
In our study (2021–2024), we have tested the scenario on two different groups of people to see whether the effects on people with learning disabilities will be comparable to the demonstrations observed. Models and a system for accessibility analysis of digital and electronic learning systems have been developed, which extends the subject–object relationship by including robots in the interaction process. The training uses robotic technologies, in particular the robot NAO, as an active participant in conducting lessons for people with special educational needs (with an emphasis on people with cognitive and visual disabilities). In recent years, the project team has implemented accessibility training. For example, in 2021, training with NAO robots (active participants in teaching lessons) was conducted for children with cognitive disabilities, demonstrating a false belief task with two NAO robots [9].
In March 2024, educational experiments on accessible learning with NAO robots were held at the Spring Seminar of the Interdisciplinary Network “Information Society”, Veliko Tarnovo, with a target group of people with visual impairments, together with the Union of the Blind in Bulgaria, Veliko Tarnovo. A pilot study on the individual interaction of three participants (two men and one woman between 40 and 50 years old) with visual impairments with the humanoid robot NAO after approval by the ethics committee at the “Institute of Robotics—BAS” was conducted. A scenario, “Get to know the robot NAO”, was created, the purpose of which was to familiarize the participants with the robot. The idea is for the robot to talk about itself, what it is as technical equipment and what it can do. This allows visually impaired people to touch the robot, learn about its parts and feel the change in the robot’s posture. Tactile sensors on the robot NAO were used, where after pressure, the robot talked about the part of the body that was touched. A voice recognition mode, where the robot responded to a greeting and changed its posture in response to a voice command, was used. Communicating with the robot NAO was interesting for the participants. As a result of the research, we received positive feedback, which encouraged us to continue our research in this direction. During the tactile exploration of the robot and its buttons, NAO described each pressed item individually based on pre-recorded short operating instructions. The instructions programmed for NAO are intended to allow the robot’s body to learn on its own. Within the seminar, workshops were organized with two groups of participants—on the first day, teachers, including the blind, were present, and on the second, people from the Veliko Tarnovo branch of the Union of the Blind (Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9), were present.
A robotic ontology was formulated, containing explanations and tools for optimizing robot actions and roles in performing tasks in the innovative classroom based on the AB concept. A special feature of our approach is that the implemented AB framework aims to connect education and healthcare by applying conceptually similar concepts: the “cyberphysical teacher” and the “cyberphysical nurse”. The similarity is in the “essential” human characteristics implemented by the two robotic agents [27].
The AB system can be of great help in adapting the process of retraining and the rehabilitation of various functions to impaired individuals at any age. A crucial aspect of the application of robotic technologies in the social or health field is the student’s level of motivation to interact with the robot, which in itself is an important research topic. In this regard, an acceptable definition of a “cyber physical nurse” is offered in [27]: “If we imagine the ‘perfect’ robotic nurse, it would probably be a cyber physical agent best described as the 4Ps.”—“pleasant, patient, polite and imperious” (p. 36979). Similar characteristics are also “essential” to an acceptable cyber-physical trainer/rehabilitator. Future studies are planned to investigate the rate of recovery as a function of the degree of motivation in rehabilitation settings with robotic assistants in the healthcare sector.

5. Conclusions

The presented AB ecosystem is an open access multifunctional tool that assists in the process of checking an online space and/or its resources against its accessibility for visually disabled people in an electronic environment. The described set of objects in the ontology is based on the authors’ ongoing research into ways of maintaining e-spaces for visually disabled people and storing and distributing resources for the same public group. Considering the socio-cultural differences in individual countries and the legislation at the international and European levels, the possibility of connectivity and feedback between the interested parties in the processes of the integration of and work with the blind is foreseen. The proposed structure for building a learning environment in this space meets the current requirements for access to information and communication technologies for PSN. The described mechanisms for uploading, using and sharing resources envisage various types of materials—3D models, audio and video materials, training courses for working with programming languages and working with robotic systems. This ontology of accessibility allows us to classify the resources in it according to several indicators—according to the role of the user, their interests, degree and type of disability, the type of resource, etc. The presented ontology is expected to help e-users with visual disabilities and increase their digital skills, as well as current and future developers of technological solutions for the blind in the e-environment. The paper emphasizes the technical aspects, so future work will focus more on the educational aspect by developing learning materials and conducting additional experiments, extending the semantic knowledge to increase access for people with other disabilities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.B. and T.T.; Methodology, G.B., T.T. and N.S.; Software, T.T. and N.N.; Validation, N.S. and M.T.-E.; Formal analysis, G.B. and T.T.; Investigation, N.S. and N.C.; Resources, M.T.-E. and A.K.; Data curation, A.K.; Writing—original draft, T.T. and N.C.; Writing—review & editing, G.B., N.N. and M.T.-E.; Visualization, N.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Fund of Bulgaria as part of the scientific project “Digital Accessibility for People with Special Needs: Methodology, Conceptual Models and Innovative EcoSystems”, (2020–2024), No. KP-06-N42/4.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Robotics, BAS, (protocol No 2/26.03.2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We are extremely grateful to Maya Dimitrova from IR BAN for her support and useful discussions, without which this research would not have happened in this way, for her careful reading of the article and for her constructive comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. A1EdTech AccessForAll Digital Resource Description Information Model. Available online: https://www.imsglobal.org/accessibility/accdrdv2p0/html/ISO_ACCDRDv2p0_InfoModelv1.html (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  2. WHO. World Report on Vision. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241516570 (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  3. EU. Union of Equality: Strategy on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021–2030 (Easy-to-Read Version). Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1535&langId=en (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  4. American Foundation for The Blind. Blindness and Low Vision. Digital Inclusion Toolkit. Available online: https://www.afb.org/AE3/toolkits (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  5. Statista. Share of Individuals with Vision Loss in Selected European Countries in 2020, by Severity. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1200735/vision-loss-by-severity-in-europe/ (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  6. EN 301 549 V3. The harmonized European Standard for ICT Accessibility. Available online: https://www.etsi.org/human-factors-accessibility/en-301-549-v3-the-harmonized-european-standard-for-ict-accessibility (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  7. EN 17161:2019. Design for All—Accessibility Following a Design for All Approach in Products, Goods and Services—Extending the Range of Users. Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/df0771a4-4515-4ea9-a074-5bd5d9ea4a0b/en-17161-2019 (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  8. AB Information Portal. Available online: http://www.math.bas.bg/vt/ab/index.php?lang=en (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  9. Dimitrova, M.; Krastev, A.; Sabev, N.; Nunez-Gonzalez, J.D. Digital and e-Learning Accessibility for People with Special Educational Needs: A Robotic Perspective. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), Sydney, Australia, 4–6 November 2021; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. de Haas, M.; Aroyo, A.M.; Haselager, P.; Smeekens, I.; Barakova, E. Comparing Robots with Different Levels of Autonomy in Educational Setting. In Practical Issues of Intelligent Innovations; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 293–311. [Google Scholar]
  11. Be My Eyes—See the World Together. Available online: https://www.bemyeyes.com/ (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  12. Rieber, L.P.; Estes, M.D. Accessibility and instructional technology: Reframing the discussion. J. Appl. Instr. Des. 2017, 6, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rix, J.; Garcia Carrizosa, H.; Seale, J.; Sheehy, K.; Hayhoe, S. The while of participation: A systematic review of participatory research involving people with sensory impairments and/or intellectual impairments. Disabil. Soc. 2020, 35, 1031–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kultsova, M.; Potseluico, A.; Dvoryankin, A. Ontology Based Personalization of Mobile Interfaces for People with Special Needs. In Creativity in Intelligent Technologies and Data Science. CIT&DS 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science; Kravets, A., Groumpos, P., Shcherbakov, M., Kultsova, M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Murillo-Morales, T.; Miesenberger, K. Ontology-based Semantic Support to Improve Accessibility of Graphics. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2015, 217, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Sanchez-Gordon, S.; Luján-Mora, S. Web Accessibility Requirements for Massive Open Online Courses. Can MOOCs be really universal and open to anyone? In Proceedings of the V Congreso Internacional sobre Calidad y Accesibilidad de la Formación Virtual (CAFVIR 2014), Antigua Guatemala, Guatemala, 14–16 May 2014. [Google Scholar]
  17. Abdellaoui, H.; Ben Mohamed, M.A.; Bacha, K.; Zrigui, M. Ontology based description of an accessible learning object. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Accessibility (ICTA), Hammamet, Tunisia, 24–26 October 2013; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nganji, J.T.; Brayshaw, M.; Tompsett, B. Ontology-driven disability-aware e-learning personalisation with ONTODAPS. Campus-Wide Inf. Syst. 2013, 30, 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Elias, M.; Lohmann, S.; Auer, S. Ontology-Based Representation of Learner Profiles for Accessible OpenCourseWare Systems. In Knowledge Engineering and Semantic Web. KESW 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science; Różewski, P., Lange, C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Elias, M.; Lohmann, S.; Auer, S. Towards an Ontology-based Representation of Accessibility Profiles for Learners. EKM@EKAW. 2016. Available online: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1780/paper5.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  21. Bogdanova, G.; Sabev, N.; Todorova-Ekmekci, M.; Noev, N.; Sotirova-Valkova, K.; Todorov, T.; Tomov, Z. Digital Accessibility for People with Special Needs: Research, Methodology, Analysis of Accessibility. Cult. Hist. Herit. Preserv. Present. Digit. (KIN J.) 2022, 8, 268–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. EBU Statement on the European Elections 2024. Stand for a Union more Inclusive of Visually Impaired People September 2023. Available online: https://www.euroblind.org/sites/default/files/documents/EBU%20Statement%20on%20European%20Parliament%20elections%202024%20(Sept2023).pdf (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  23. EU. Commission Welcomes Political Agreement on European Disability and Parking Cards. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=1484&furtherNews=yes&newsId=10763 (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  24. Horridge, M.; Knublauch, H.; Rector, A.; Stevens, R.; Wroe, C. A Practical Guide To Building OWL Ontologies Using The Protégé-OWL Plugin and CO-ODE Tools. 2007. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230585369_A_Practical_Guide_To_Building_OWL_Ontologies_Using_The_Prot%27eg%27e-OWL_Plugin_and_CO-ODE_Tools (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  25. Directive (EU) 2019/882 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the Accessibility Requirements for Products and Services (Text with EEA Relevance). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019L0882 (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  26. EBU. Making Information Accessible for All. Available online: https://www.euroblind.org/publications-and-resources/making-information-accessible-all (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  27. Dimitrova, M. Essential ‘Human’ Features of the Cyber-Physical Nurse. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2022, 46, 36979–36981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The AB ecosystem’s conceptual structure.
Figure 1. The AB ecosystem’s conceptual structure.
Information 15 00315 g001
Figure 2. Class hierarchy of AB ontology of accessibility on the Protégé platform.
Figure 2. Class hierarchy of AB ontology of accessibility on the Protégé platform.
Information 15 00315 g002
Figure 3. Data properties.
Figure 3. Data properties.
Information 15 00315 g003
Figure 4. Object properties.
Figure 4. Object properties.
Information 15 00315 g004
Figure 5. Individuals of classes (a) Learner; (b) Teacher; (c) Resource and (d) Lesson.
Figure 5. Individuals of classes (a) Learner; (b) Teacher; (c) Resource and (d) Lesson.
Information 15 00315 g005aInformation 15 00315 g005b
Figure 6. A computational framework for the classroom of the future based on the AB concept.
Figure 6. A computational framework for the classroom of the future based on the AB concept.
Information 15 00315 g006
Figure 7. Educational experiment with robot and didactic materials.
Figure 7. Educational experiment with robot and didactic materials.
Information 15 00315 g007
Figure 8. Educational experiments with robotic technologies in inclusive classrooms (first day of seminar).
Figure 8. Educational experiments with robotic technologies in inclusive classrooms (first day of seminar).
Information 15 00315 g008
Figure 9. Educational experiments on accessible learning with the NAO robot with visually impaired people (second day of the seminar).
Figure 9. Educational experiments on accessible learning with the NAO robot with visually impaired people (second day of the seminar).
Information 15 00315 g009
Table 1. The possibilities of working with the system according to the user role.
Table 1. The possibilities of working with the system according to the user role.
ActivityclassSoftwareDeveloperclassTeacherclassLearner
Create/update/delete role in classLearnerX
Create/update/delete role in classTeacherXX
Create/update/delete a subcategory in the classDisabilityX
Access to attendance data of e-users in classLearnerX
Access to attendance data of e-users in classTeacherXX
Create/update/delete association between classes “x”X
Access to view resources in class “x”
Upload/update/delete a resourceX
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bogdanova, G.; Todorov, T.; Noev, N.; Sabev, N.; Chehlarova, N.; Todorova-Ekmekci, M.; Krastev, A. An Ecosystem for the Provision of Digital Accessibility for People with Special Needs. Information 2024, 15, 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060315

AMA Style

Bogdanova G, Todorov T, Noev N, Sabev N, Chehlarova N, Todorova-Ekmekci M, Krastev A. An Ecosystem for the Provision of Digital Accessibility for People with Special Needs. Information. 2024; 15(6):315. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060315

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bogdanova, Galina, Todor Todorov, Nikolay Noev, Negoslav Sabev, Neda Chehlarova, Mirena Todorova-Ekmekci, and Aleksandar Krastev. 2024. "An Ecosystem for the Provision of Digital Accessibility for People with Special Needs" Information 15, no. 6: 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060315

APA Style

Bogdanova, G., Todorov, T., Noev, N., Sabev, N., Chehlarova, N., Todorova-Ekmekci, M., & Krastev, A. (2024). An Ecosystem for the Provision of Digital Accessibility for People with Special Needs. Information, 15(6), 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060315

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop