Journal of Intelligence

8 pages, 261 KiB

Open AccessArticle

What Happened to the Participants of the Math Olympiad 1971? A Multiple-Case Study Concerning the Occupational Success of the Winning Team from Hungary, Math Olympiad–Occupational Success

by Benedikt Gasser

J. Intell. 2019, 7(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence7010009 - 20 Mar 2019

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 6462

Abstract

The aim of this multiple-case study was to find out how the most successful team of the 1971 Mathematical Olympiad in Hungary developed professionally. It is impressive that in 1971, no fewer than four participants on the Hungarian team received gold medals and [...] Read more.

The aim of this multiple-case study was to find out how the most successful team of the 1971 Mathematical Olympiad in Hungary developed professionally. It is impressive that in 1971, no fewer than four participants on the Hungarian team received gold medals and four participants received silver medals. Seven of the eight analyzed participants on the team came from a grammar school in Budapest. Three of the four gold medal winners achieved remarkable academic positions. On average, professional positions were achieved (as scored by the magnitude prestige scale) well above the average for a normal grammar school sample. Interestingly, the calculated average of the Hungarian team (156.5 ± 15.5) was slightly higher than that of the comparison team from Sweden (142.8 ± 30.5), but this difference was not significant (p = 0.351). In principle, excellence seems to result in excellence. For several former participants on the Hungarian team, it was shown that they continued to be extremely successful in the field of mathematics, with a thematic focus in the field of statistics and probability calculations. Full article

3 pages, 183 KiB

Open AccessEditorial

Intelligence in Education

by Tomoe Kanaya

J. Intell. 2019, 7(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence7010008 - 4 Mar 2019

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 7098

Abstract

The articles in this special issue provide an overview of the wide breadth of questions and methodologies that arise when the research devoted to intelligence intersect with the research devoted to U.S. education. The unique contributions of each paper are highlighted and discussed [...] Read more.

The articles in this special issue provide an overview of the wide breadth of questions and methodologies that arise when the research devoted to intelligence intersect with the research devoted to U.S. education. The unique contributions of each paper are highlighted and discussed based on their contribution to the literature. The implications of these findings for educational research and policy are briefly discussed. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligence in Education)

17 pages, 671 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Assessing Student’s Achievement Gaps between Ethnic Groups in Brazil

by Luis E. C. Rocha and Luana de F. Nascimento

J. Intell. 2019, 7(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence7010007 - 20 Feb 2019

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 8337

Abstract

Achievement gaps refer to the difference in the performance on assessments of students belonging to different social groups. Achievement gaps between ethnic groups have been observed in countries with heterogeneous populations. In this paper, achievement gaps between ethnic populations in Brazil were analyzed [...] Read more.

Achievement gaps refer to the difference in the performance on assessments of students belonging to different social groups. Achievement gaps between ethnic groups have been observed in countries with heterogeneous populations. In this paper, achievement gaps between ethnic populations in Brazil were analyzed by studying the performance of a large cohort of senior high-school students in a standardized national exam. Ethnic groups were stratified by Brazilian states and socio-economic variables to homogeneize the groups, and the analyses focused on the disciplines of mathematics and writing that involve different cognitive functions. A Welch’s t-test analysis was performed and key socio-economic variables that may explain the gaps were studied. The results show that gaps between ethnic groups of students living in low-income households were either statistically insignificant or small (2–

6 %

) if statistically significant. Larger gaps however were observed for students coming from high-income families in some contexts. Although parental education was associated with higher performance, it may either increase, decrease or maintain the gaps between White and Black, and between White and Pardo students. Our results support that socio-economic variables, linked to historical developments, have an impact on student’s performance irrespective of ethnic background, resulting on little to no influence on group performance when students are exposed to similar cultural and economic contexts. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 400 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Stephen Jay Gould’s Analysis of the Army Beta Test in The Mismeasure of Man: Distortions and Misconceptions Regarding a Pioneering Mental Test

by Russell T. Warne, Jared Z. Burton, Aisa Gibbons and Daniel A. Melendez

J. Intell. 2019, 7(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence7010006 - 20 Feb 2019

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 21766

Abstract

In The Mismeasure of Man, Stephen Jay Gould argued that the preconceived beliefs and biases of scientists influence their methods and conclusions. To show the potential consequences of this, Gould used examples from the early days of psychometrics and allied fields, arguing [...] Read more.

In The Mismeasure of Man, Stephen Jay Gould argued that the preconceived beliefs and biases of scientists influence their methods and conclusions. To show the potential consequences of this, Gould used examples from the early days of psychometrics and allied fields, arguing that inappropriate assumptions and an elitist desire to rank individuals and/or groups produced incorrect results. In this article, we investigate a section of The Mismeasure of Man in which Gould evaluated the Army Beta intelligence test for illiterate American draftees in World War I. We evaluated Gould’s arguments that the Army Beta (a) had inappropriate content, (b) had unsuitable administration conditions, (c) suffered from short time limits, and (d) could not have measured intelligence. By consulting the historical record and conducting a pre-registered replication of Gould’s administration of the test to a sample of college students, we show that Gould mischaracterized the Army Beta in a number of ways. Instead, the Army Beta was a well-designed test by the standards of the time, and all evidence indicates that it measured intelligence a century ago and can, to some extent, do so today. Full article

11 pages, 289 KiB

Open AccessCommentary

Commenting on the “Great Debate”: General Abilities, Specific Abilities, and the Tools of the Trade

by Margaret E. Beier, Harrison J. Kell and Jonas W. B. Lang

J. Intell. 2019, 7(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence7010005 - 18 Feb 2019

Cited by 6 | Viewed by 7270

Abstract

We review papers in the special issue regarding the great debate on general and specific abilities. Papers in the special issue either provided an empirical examination of the debate using a uniform dataset or they provided a debate commentary. Themes that run through [...] Read more.

We review papers in the special issue regarding the great debate on general and specific abilities. Papers in the special issue either provided an empirical examination of the debate using a uniform dataset or they provided a debate commentary. Themes that run through the papers and that are discussed further here are that: (1) the importance of general and specific ability predictors will largely depend on the outcome to be predicted, (2) the effectiveness of both general and specific predictors will largely depend on the quality and breadth of how the manifest indicators are measured, and (3) research on general and specific ability predictors is alive and well and more research is warranted. We conclude by providing a review of potentially fruitful areas of future research. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Great Debate: General Ability and Specific Abilities in the Prediction of Important Outcomes)

17 pages, 2020 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Advancing the Measurement of Personal Intelligence with the Test of Personal Intelligence, Version 5 (TOPI 5)

by John D. Mayer, David R. Caruso and A. T. Panter

J. Intell. 2019, 7(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence7010004 - 6 Feb 2019

Cited by 7 | Viewed by 10016

Abstract

People use their personal intelligence (PI) to understand personality in themselves and others. In Studies 1 and 2 (Ns = 961 and 548), individuals completed the Test of Personal Intelligence, Version 5 (TOPI 5), which is introduced here. The TOPI 5 [...] Read more.

People use their personal intelligence (PI) to understand personality in themselves and others. In Studies 1 and 2 (Ns = 961 and 548), individuals completed the Test of Personal Intelligence, Version 5 (TOPI 5), which is introduced here. The TOPI 5 is an ability assessment with a broader range of content and more challenging items than earlier test versions. In past research, factor analyses indicated that people employ two distinct but highly correlated abilities to problem-solve in this area. These two-factor models, however, exhibited instabilities and limited applicability between the TOPI 4 and 5 in this research (and as reported in the Supplementary Materials). In Study 3, we successfully test the one-factor models of the TOPI with the present data and archival data sets (N_archival = 19,627). We then use the one-factor models to develop a pair of new test forms: one that is compatible with all the TOPI test versions and another, TOPI 5E, that is better at distinguishing among people scoring in the higher range of performance relative to previous measures. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 2253 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Towards a Process Model of Sustained Attention Tests

by Iris Blotenberg and Lothar Schmidt-Atzert

J. Intell. 2019, 7(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence7010003 - 28 Jan 2019

Cited by 10 | Viewed by 7957

Abstract

Taking up new approaches and calls for experimental test validation, in the present study we propose and validate a process model of sustained attention tests. Four sub-components were postulated: the perception of an item, a simple mental operation to solve the item, a [...] Read more.

Taking up new approaches and calls for experimental test validation, in the present study we propose and validate a process model of sustained attention tests. Four sub-components were postulated: the perception of an item, a simple mental operation to solve the item, a motor reaction, and the shift to the next item. In two studies, several cognitive tasks and modified versions of the d2-R test of sustained attention were applied in order to determine performance in the proposed sub-components. Their contribution for the prediction of performance in sustained attention tests and tests of higher cognitive abilities was assessed. The sub-components of the process model explained a large amount of variance in sustained attention tests, namely 55–74%. More specifically, perceptual and mental operation speed were the strongest predictors, while there was a trend towards a small influence of motor speed on test performance. The measures of item shifting showed low reliabilities and did not predict test scores. In terms of discriminant validity, results of Study 1 indicated that the postulated sub-components were insufficient to explain a large amount of variance in working memory span tasks, in Study 2 the same was demonstrated for reasoning tasks. Altogether, the present study is the first to disentangle sub-components in sustained attention tests and to determine their role for test performance. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 413 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Correlates of Adult Vocabulary Task Performance: Findings from a British Cohort

by Helen Cheng and Adrian Furnham

J. Intell. 2019, 7(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence7010002 - 12 Jan 2019

Cited by 4 | Viewed by 7334

Abstract

This study explored a longitudinal data set of 4361 adults (2119 males and 2239 females) to examine factors that influence adult vocabulary task performance. Data were collected at birth, in childhood (age 10 years), during teenage years (age 16 years), and in adulthood [...] Read more.

This study explored a longitudinal data set of 4361 adults (2119 males and 2239 females) to examine factors that influence adult vocabulary task performance. Data were collected at birth, in childhood (age 10 years), during teenage years (age 16 years), and in adulthood (ages 30, 34, and 42 years) to examine the effects of family social status, childhood cognitive ability, teenager locus of control, psychological distress, educational qualifications, and occupational prestige in adulthood on an adult vocabulary task—an index of crystallized intelligence. Structural equation modeling showed that childhood cognitive ability, teenager locus of control, education, and occupation were all significant and direct predictors of adult vocabulary task performance. Parental social status affected the outcome variable mediated through educational qualifications. The strongest predictor of adult vocabulary task performance was childhood cognitive ability, followed by educational qualifications and locus of control. Finally, limitations were acknowledged. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

2 pages, 194 KiB

Open AccessEditorial

Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Journal of Intelligence in 2018

by J. Intell. Editorial Office

J. Intell. 2019, 7(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence7010001 - 8 Jan 2019

Viewed by 5353

Abstract

Rigorous peer-review is the corner-stone of high-quality academic publishing. [...] Full article

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

J. Intell., Volume 7, Issue 1 (March 2019) – 9 articles

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI