Next Article in Journal
Disturbance of Vancomycin Infusion Flow during Multidrug Infusion: Influence on Endothelial Cell Toxicity
Previous Article in Journal
Strategies for Antimicrobial Peptides Immobilization on Surfaces to Prevent Biofilm Growth on Biomedical Devices
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetic Comparison of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli from Workers and Pigs at Vietnamese Pig Farms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/antibiotics11010015
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Carriage Rate of the Multiple Resistant Plasmids Harboring Quinolone Resistance Genes in Enterobacter spp. Isolated from Healthy Individuals

by
Yongyan Long
1,†,
Xin Lu
2,†,
Xiansheng Ni
1,
Jiaqi Liu
2,3,
Mengyu Wang
1,2,
Xu Li
3,
Zhe Li
2,
Haijian Zhou
2,
Zhenpeng Li
2,
Kui Wu
1,
Wei Wang
1,
Liya Yang
2,3,
Jialiang Xu
3,
Haiying Chen
1,* and
Biao Kan
2,4,*
1
The Collaboration Unit for Field Epidemiology of State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Animal-Origin and Vector-Borne Disease, Nanchang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanchang 330038, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China
3
Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 102206, China
4
School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this article.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11010015
Submission received: 5 November 2021 / Revised: 27 November 2021 / Accepted: 4 December 2021 / Published: 23 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomic Analysis and AMR Detection in Pathogenic Bacteria)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria causing intractable and even fatal infections are a major health concern. Resistant bacteria residing in the intestinal tract of healthy individuals present a silent threat because of frequent transmission via conjugation and transposition. Plasmids harboring quinolone resistance genes are increasingly detected in clinical isolates worldwide. Here, we investigated the molecular epidemiology of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) in Gram-negative bacteria from healthy service trade workers. From 157 rectal swab samples, 125 ciprofloxacin-resistant strains, including 112 Escherichia coli, 10 Klebsiella pneumoniae, two Proteus mirabilis, and one Citrobacter braakii, were isolated. Multiplex PCR screening identified 39 strains harboring the PMQR genes (including 17 qnr,19 aac(6′)-Ib-cr, and 22 oqxA/oqxB). The genome and plasmid sequences of 39 and 31 strains, respectively, were obtained by short- and long-read sequencing. PMQR genes mainly resided in the IncFIB, IncFII, and IncR plasmids, and coexisted with 3–11 other resistance genes. The high PMQR gene carriage rate among Gram-negative bacteria isolated from healthy individuals suggests the high-frequency transmission of these genes via plasmids, along with other resistance genes. Thus, healthy individuals may spread antibiotic-resistant bacterial, highlighting the need for improved monitoring and control of the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and genes in healthy individuals.

1. Introduction

Quinolones, a group of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents, are widely used for treating infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria and are routinely used in animal breeding. In China, total antibiotic usage is estimated at approximately 162,000 tons/year [1], with human consumption accounting for approximately 48% and the remainder attributed to consumption by livestock and other domesticated animals [2]. Fluoroquinolone usage accounts for 17% of this total [3]. The acquisition of quinolone resistance may be caused by (i) chromosomal mutations in the bacterial genes encoding the protein targets of quinolones or by mutations that cause reduced drug accumulation via decreased uptake or increased efflux, or (ii) via the plasmid-located genes associated with quinolone resistance [4]. To date, three plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) mechanisms have been described: the first involves Qnr proteins, the second involves aac(6′)-Ib-cr genes, and the third involves oqxA, oqxB, and qepA plasmid-mediated efflux pumps [5,6]. Since the first PMQR gene was identified in a Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate [7], horizontal gene transfer has been considered the main route of quinolone resistance dissemination [8].
Numerous studies on the prevalence of PMQR genes in clinical settings and in animals have been reported worldwide [9,10,11,12]. However, few studies have investigated the prevalence of PMQR genes in healthy people. To ensure food safety, it is a regulatory requirement in China for healthy individuals in food-related industries to undergo health examinations to determine whether they harbor transferable drug resistance genes. In this study, we selected healthy individuals from the catering industry to investigate the prevalence of PMQR genes, and to estimate the potential threat that mobile quinolone resistance genes pose to the food industry.

2. Results

2.1. Bacterial Isolates

In total, 125 non-duplicated ciprofloxacin (CIP)-resistant Gram-negative strains (including 112 Escherichia coli, 10 K. pneumoniae, two Proteus mirabilis, and one Citrobacter braakii) were isolated from 157 rectal swab samples; this corresponds to a carriage rate of 79.6% (125/157).

2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Analysis

All isolates were resistant to one or more quinolones or fluoroquinolones, including CIP (100%, 125/125), moxifloxacin (100%, 125/125), LVX (99.2%, 124/125), and levofloxacin (99.2%, 124/125), with the next highest resistance rates found for TET (73.6%, 92/125), SXT (66.4%, 84/125), GEN (37.6%, 47/125), and CHL (36.8%, 46/125). Some isolates exhibited resistance to cephalosporins, including cefazolin (50.4%, 63/125), FEP (40%, 50/125), and AXO (48.8%, 61/125). The antimicrobial susceptibility test results for the 29 tested antimicrobials are shown in Figure 1.

2.3. Prevalence of PMQR Genes

Among the 125 isolates, the overall detection rate for PMQR genes was 31.2% (39/125). PMQR genes were identified in 26 E. coli isolates (23.2%, 26/112), 10 K. pneumoniae (100%, 10/10), two P. mirabilis (100%, 2/2), and one C. braakii isolate (100%, 1/1) (Table 1).
The qnr subtypes detected included qnrS1, qnrS2, qnrS13, qnrB6, qnrB52, qnrB91, and qnrA1, with qnrS1 predominating. None of the isolates were positive for qnrC, qnrD, or qepA. The aac(6′)-Ib gene was detected in 26 isolates. In most of these isolates (19 isolates, 73.1%), the mutated variant aac(6′)-Ib-cr of this gene was identified. There were 22 isolates that carried both oqxA and oqxB genes.
Overall, the most prevalent PMQR genes were oqxB (17.6%, 22/125), oqxA (17.6%, 22/125), aac(6′)-Ib-cr (15.2%, 19/125), and qnr (qnrS1 = 7 qnrS2 = 2, qnrS13 = 1,qnrB6 = 4, qnrB52 = 1, qnrB91 = 1, and qnrA1 = 1; 13.6%, 16/125), additionally, both qnr2 and qnr13 subtypes genes were detected in one E.coli strain. Among the 125 isolates, 26 (20.8%) carried two or more PMQR genes. Certain E. coli isolates (8.9%) carried only a single PMQR gene, whereas all K. pneumoniae isolates carried three or more PMQR genes (Table 1).

2.4. Other Acquired Resistance Genes Exist and Coexist in the Isolates

We further identified coexisting antibiotic resistance genes based on the complete sequences of PMQR gene-harboring plasmids. Among all 39 PMQR gene-positive isolates (Table 2), the prevalence of beta-lactam genes in E. coli was 88.5% (23/26), with the main genotypes being blaTEM-1B (40.7%), blaOXA-1 (29.6%), and blaCTX-M-55 (18.5%). One K. pneumoniae isolate was positive for blaCTX-M-15 + blaOXA + blaTEM-1B, and three other isolates were positive for either blaSHV182, blaSHV187, or blaPLA2a. The sulfonamide gene detection rate in K. pneumoniae was 80% (8/10), with sul1 being the predominant genotype, whereas in E. coli it was 88.5% (23/26), with sul1 (44%) and sul2 (55.6%) predominating. The TET gene detection rate in K. pneumoniae was 80% (8/10), which included tet(A) (50%) and tet(D) (30%), whereas it was 88.5% (23/26) in E. coli, with tet(A) (66.7%) and tet(B) (22.2%) the main genotypes. While all K. pneumoniae isolates carried fosA, only five E. coli isolates carried fosA3. The trimethoprim gene detection rate in K. pneumoniae was 80% (8/10), with dfrA1, dfrA12, dfrA17, and dfrA27 identified, whereas that for E. coli was 88.5% (23/26), with dfrA17 (40.7%) the predominant genotype. The aminoglycoside gene detection rate in K. pneumoniae was 70% (7/10), with aadA16 and aac(3)-IId the predominant genotypes, whereas that for E. coli was 88.5% (23/26), with aph(3″)-Ib combined with aph(6)-Id predominating. In addition, floR was the predominant phenicol-resistance gene in the K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and P. mirabilis isolates. The macrolide gene detection rate in E. coli was 100% (26/26), and mph(A), mdf(A), erm(B), and ere(A) were detected. In addition, two E. coli isolates harbored the mcr-1.1 gene. The distribution of drug resistance genes in the PMQR gene-positive isolates is shown in Figure 2.

2.5. Drug Resistance Caused by Gene Mutations

Gene mutations in the DNA topoisomerase IV and gyrase encoding genes were found in all 26 E. coli strains (100%, 26/26). Ser at position 83 of the E. coli gyrase subunit A (gyrA) gene was mutated to Leu, and Asp at position 87 was mutated to Asn or Tyr. Ala at position 56 of the DNA topoisomerase IV, subunit A (parC) gene was mutated to Thr, Ser at position 80 was mutated to Ile, and Glu at position 84 was mutated to Val. Ser at position 458 of the topoisomerase IV, subunit B (parE) gene was mutated to Ala and Ile at position 529 was mutated to Leu. Among these, the parC and gyrA gene mutations were the most frequent.

2.6. Consistency Rates between the Drug Resistance Genes and Drug Resistance Phenotypes

By analyzing the correspondence between drug resistance genes and drug resistance phenotypes (Table 3), we found that the drug sensitivity results for 10 strains of K. pneumoniae to CIP, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, and GEN were completely consistent with the sequencing results (100%). The drug sensitivity test results for norfloxacin, however, were completely different from the sequencing results. The antibiotics whose drug sensitivity results were consistent with the sequencing results were cefoxitin (90%), amoxicillin-clavulanate (90%), piperacillin-tazobactam (90%), TET (70%), TGC (60%), CHL (90%), SXT (90%), FEP (50%), minocycline (50%), and amikacin (50%). The antimicrobial substances with a consistency rate of less than 50% were cefoperazone-sulbactam (40%), AXO (30%), aztreonam (10%), TGC (40%), and tobramycin (40%).
Additionally, the resistance patterns of the 26 E. coli strains to CIP, TGC, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, cefoxitin, TET, GEN, tobramycin, and myxin were completely consistent with the predicted results (100%). Over 50% of the drug sensitivity results from the other antibiotics were consistent with the predicted results, including cefepime (70.37%), FEP (66.67%), piperacillin-tazobactam (55.56%), CHL (77.78%), amikacin (55.56%), fosfomycin (92.59%), and SXT (88.89%).

3. Discussion

Antibiotic resistance is recognized as a ‘One Health’ challenge because of the rapid emergence and dissemination of resistant bacteria and genes that not only exists in humans (both in healthy individuals and patients), but also in wildlife, companion animals, agriculture (food-producing animals, fruits, and vegetables), and the environment (water and soil) on a global scale. Enterobacter spp. resistant to quinolones frequently arise in animals, being easily disseminated through the food-chain [13]. In rectal swab samples from some wildlife (non-human primates, mice) rectal swab samples, different variants of the qnrB gene were detected [14]. In the rectal swab samples selected from the companion animals, Gibson et al. reported that the qnrA1 or qnrB2 gene was often detected long with aac(6′)-1b-cr [15]. Approximately 4.1% (15/363) of strains isolated from the food-producing animals, such as swine, poultry, rabbit, and cattle, carried the qnrB2, qnrB19, and qnrS1 genes, simultaneously [13]. In addition, fruits are usually consumed without cooking or processing, making them a potentially high-risk source in humans [16]. As mediators for the dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli, raw salads vegetable present a great risk to public health, and Nayme et al. detected PMQR determinants were detected in 52% of isolates [17]. In a study of wastewater samples from the swine feedlot, qnrD, qepA, oqxB, qnrS, and oqxA genes were detected [18]. Vaz-Moreira et al. found that the resistance strains could be disseminated from hospital effluent to aquatic environments, and that quinolone-resistant Gram-negative bacteria carried one or more of the PMQR genes [19]. Among 200 faecal samples randomly collected from chickens and pigs originating from different farms at the time of slaughter in Ibadan and Nigeria, PMQR genes were detected in 18 E. coli strains, which suggesting that the food animals may represent an important reservoir of PMQR in this region of Africa, and that antibiotic-resistant bacteria carried by animals can enter the human food chain through the consumption of meat or by direct contact [20]. PMQR genes (including aac(6′)-1b-cr, qnrB, and qnrS) were frequently detected in the herbs originating from Thailand (Water morning glory, Acacia and Betel leaf), Vietnam (Parsley, Asian pennywort, Houttuynia leaf, and Mint) and Malaysia (Holy basil and Parsley), suggesting that fresh culinary herbs from Southeast Asia are a potential source of contamination of food with quinolones resistant bacteria [21]. Because these herbs are generally consumed without appropriate heating, the resistant bacteria may be readily transferred to humans. Therefore, AMR Gram-negative bacteria can transfer from human-to-human directly or indirectly.
In this study, the isolation rate for Gram-negative strains with CIP resistance was alarmingly high at 79.6%. Almost all of the CIP-resistant strains were also resistant to moxifloxacin, norfloxacin, and levofloxacin. This may be related to the fact that these antibiotics are commonly used to treat gastroenteritis in adults [22]. Furthermore, low-dose antibiotics are added to animal feed as growth promoters and, while providing economic benefits, this accelerates the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria [13]. These factors contribute to the high prevalence of quinolone-resistant bacteria in healthy people. Multidrug resistance to different antibiotic categories was found in most isolates, particularly to commonly used antimicrobials such as TET, FEP, AXO, and cefepime. The minimum inhibitory concentration 50 (MIC50) and MIC90 for TET exceeded 16 µg/mL. Resistance to some commonly used clinical antibiotics, especially third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, is concerning because this may lead to clinical treatment failure. To the best of our knowledge, few prevalence studies on PMQR genes in healthy people have been conducted. In this study, the PMQR gene detection rate was 31.2% and PMQR genes were identified in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis, and C. braakii isolates. The PMQR gene carriage rate for E. coli in health practitioners was shown to be higher than that in healthy volunteers (14.3%) [23], and the reported detection rate for PMQR genes in animal breeders (55.9%) and the carriage rate in patients (51.4%) [24] were both higher than in our study [12]. The reason for these differences could be the high use of these antibiotics in clinical treatment and animal breeding. We found that the PMQR gene carriage rate for K. pneumoniae was higher than that for E. coli, which was consistent with previous studies showing carriage rates for K. pneumoniae and E. coli of 60.0–65.3% and 12.6–22.3%, respectively [25,26].
The most prevalent PMQR genes were oqxB and oqxA, followed by aac(6′)-Ib-cr and qnr. The detection rates for the aac(6′)-Ib-cr and qnr genes in E. coli were 9.8% and 6.25%, respectively, which were higher than the 9.0% and 0.85% rates recorded in Sweden and Norway [27]; these differences might be related to the scope and degree of antibiotic use in the different countries.
The prevalence rates for aac(6′)-Ib-cr, oqxB, and oqxA were slightly higher than those reported previously in healthy populations, but the prevalence of qnr was lower than that reported previously [28]. Some studies have shown that oqxB and oqxA are widely distributed among E. coli strains isolated from animal husbandry, with detection rates of 58.5% and 33.8%, respectively [29,30]. The oqxB and oqxA genes are also prevalent among K. pneumoniae isolates [31]. Of the 125 isolates we tested, two or more PMQR genes were present in 27 (21.5%) of the isolates. Some of the E. coli isolates (8.9%) only carried a single PMQR gene, whereas all of the K. pneumoniae isolates carried three or more PMQR genes, a result similar to previous findings [32].
According to the rules and regulations of the Public Places Sanitation Administration, the participants who work in the food processing and service trades must undertake a preventive health examination each year. In this study, we just focused on the individuals who work in the food processing and service trades; however, in future studies, we will expand our research to include all healthy individuals as the sample sources to represent the general healthy population.
In the present study, 39 PMQR-positive strains carried six to 16 types of acquired resistance genes, with most of the resistance genes co-existing on the same plasmid. The tet(A) and blaCTX-M-55 genes were spread throughout the population, which may have public health significance. K. pneumoniae isolates also have a tendency to acquire resistance [33]. In this study, we found that the sul1, floR, and tet(A) genes were more common, which may also have public health significance. The most prevalent plasmid replicon types were IncFIB and IncFII in E. coli and IncFIB, IncR, and IncHI2 in K. pneumoniae. Other studies have also reported that these plasmids are the main types [31]. aac(6′)-Ib-cr and qnr were found to be chromosomally located in E. coli, which is in agreement with previous reports [34,35]. We found that oqxA and oqxB were chromosomally located in all strains except for one in which these genes were not detected. Previous studies have also reported that oqxA and oqxB are chromosomally located in K. pneumoniae [36]. In addition, two strains showed resistance to polymyxin, with mcr-1.1 located on plasmids IncI2 and IncX4. Previous studies have reported that variant mcr-1.6 was present in Salmonella isolated from healthy people [37]. Plasmids that carry mcr-1.1 are a concern for healthy people because the frequent exchange of antibiotic resistance genes among E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and Salmonella enterica serovars could lead to the spread of polymyxin resistance [38].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Samples and Bacterial Strains

From May to August 2015, approximately 40 rectal swab samples were collected once a month; 157 rectal swab samples were collected at the Nanchang Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China) from healthy participants (55 males, 102 females; age range: 18–57 years), who received preventive health examination because of their occupation in food processing and other service trades, according to the rules of the administration for market regulation. None of the healthy individuals included in this study had been exposed to antibiotics or a hospital environment during the 3 months prior to sample collection. The swab samples were screened using ciprofloxacin (CIP) (4 µg/mL)-containing LB agar plates incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. For each sample, one transparent and smooth colony was selected, followed by identification using the API20E test (bioMerieux, France).

4.2. PMQR Gene Amplification

All of the selected isolates were screened for nine PMQR genes (qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, qnrS, aac(6′)-Ib, oqxA, oqxB, and qepA) by PCR using the primers and reaction parameters reported in the references [9,28].

4.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

For the PMQR gene-positive isolates, we conducted antimicrobial susceptibility testing with the following 29 antimicrobial agents: amikacin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ampicillin-sulbactam, aztreonam, cefazolin, cefepime, cefoperazone-sulbactam, cefoxitin, ceftazidime (FEP), ceftriaxone (AXO), cefuroxime, chloramphenicol (CHL), CIP, colistin, ertapenem, fosfomycin with G6P, gentamicin (GEN), imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, minocycline, moxifloxacin, nitrofurantoin, norfloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, tetracycline (TET), tigecycline (TGC), tobramycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT). We used the reference broth microdilution method with custom-made plates (BD, Phoenix NMIC-413). The breakpoints for each antimicrobial susceptibility test were selected based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2017 [39]) recommendations and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility recommendations (EUCAST, 2018 [40]). E. coli ATCC25922 and K. pneumoniae ATCC700603 were used as quality control strains.

4.4. Genome and Plasmid Sequencing

DNA was extracted from 39 PMQR gene-positive isolates using the Wizard Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), followed by sequencing (HiSeq sequencer; Illumina, California, USA). Plasmid DNA was purified from 100 mL of liquid culture of the strain using the Qiafilter Plasmid max kit (Qiagen, Dusseldorf, German) as per the protocol for low-copy plasmids, and then sequenced using MinION (Oxford Nanopore, Oxford, UK) sequencers. MinION libraries of all plasmid DNAs were prepared using the SQK-LSK108 nanopore sequencing kit, R9 version (Oxford Nanopore, Oxford, UK). 1D base-calling was performed on a local computer in real-time by MinKNOW. We assembled each genome using a combination of short- and long-reads using the Unicycler hybrid assembler [41]. Plasmid replicons and drug resistance genes were identified in silico using online tools (http://www.genomicepidemiology.org/, accessed on 21 June 2021).
We sequenced the genomes of the PMQR gene-positive strains and the PMQR gene-harboring plasmids using both short- and long-read sequencing techniques. The complete sequences of all detected PMQR gene-positive plasmids have been deposited in the GenBank database, under BioSample numbers SAMN23848296, SAMN23848740, SAMN23848304, SAMN23848904, SAMN23848884, SAMN23895582, SAMN23895744, SAMN23895604, SAMN23895602, SAMN23895726, SAMN23895742, SAMN23895581, SAMN23895741, SAMN23895745, SAMN23895750, SAMN23895740, SAMN23895754, SAMN23895770, SAMN23895770, SAMN23895789, SAMN23895747, SAMN23895753, SAMN23895790, SAMN23895791, SAMN23895793, SAMN23895793, SAMN23895794, SAMN23895795, SAMN23895796, SAMN23895797, SAMN23895798, SAMN23895799, SAMN23895802, SAMN23895803, SAMN23895804, SAMN23895806, SAMN23895809, SAMN23895810, SAMN23847286.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we investigated the prevalence of quinolone-resistant, Gram-negative bacteria in healthy people. The prevalence rate of PMQR genes in healthy participants was relatively high, and the co-existence of resistance genes on plasmids is an important finding. Bacterial drug resistance in healthy people is a serious issue because it may unknowingly lead to the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which poses a serious public health threat. These findings highlight the necessity for improved monitoring of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in healthy individuals.

Author Contributions

Investigation and resources: Y.L., K.W. and H.C.; analysis: M.W. and Z.L. (Zhenpeng Li); methodology: X.N., X.L. (Xu Li) and L.Y.; visualization: H.Z. and Z.L. (Zhe Li); writing—original draft preparation: X.L. (Xin Lu), J.L. and J.X.; writing—review & editing: W.W. and H.C.; supervision: B.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project (2018ZX10714002), and the Foundation for Young Scholars from China CDC (2018A103).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, X.M. International perspectives on food safety and regulations—A need for harmonized regulations: Perspectives in China. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 1928–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tang, Q.; Song, P.; Li, J.; Kong, F.; Sun, L.; Xu, L. Control of antibiotic resistance in China must not be delayed: The current state of resistance and policy suggestions for the government, medical facilities, and patients. Biosci. Trends 2016, 10, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Zhang, Q.Q.; Ying, G.G.; Pan, C.G.; Liu, Y.S.; Zhao, J.L. Comprehensive evaluation of antibiotics emission and fate in the river basins of China: Source analysis, multimedia modeling, and linkage to bacterial resistance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 6772–6782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Anna, F.; Sergi, M.; Ernest, G.; Jordi, V. Mechanism of action of and resistance to quinolones. Microb. Biotechnol. 2009, 2, 40–61. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rodríguez-Martínez, J.M.; Machuca, J.; Cano, M.E.; Calvo, J.; Martinez-Martinez, L.; Pascual, A. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance: Two decades on. Drug Resist. Updates 2016, 29, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jacoby, G.A.; Strahilevitz, J.; Hooper, D.C. Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance. Microbiol. Spectr. 2014, 2, 475–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Martà nez-Martà nez, L.; Pascual, A.; Jacoby, G.A. Quinolone resistance from a transferable plasmid. Lancet 1998, 351, 797–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ruiz, J.; Pons, M.J.; Gomes, C. Transferable mechanisms of quinolone resistance. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2012, 40, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chen, X.; Zhang, W.; Pan, W.; Yin, J.; Pan, Z.; Gao, S.; Jiao, X. Prevalence of qnr, aac(6′)-Ib-cr, qepA, and oqxAB in Escherichia coli isolates from humans, animals, and the environment. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 3423–3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Jiang, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, H.; Wang, Y.; Shi, L.; Zhou, L. Detection of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants and qnrS expression in Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2014, 8, 1625–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Zhao, L.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, B.; Wei, Z.; Shen, P.; Li, S.; Li, L.; Xiao, Y. Molecular epidemiology and genetic diversity of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from patients with community-onset infections in 30 Chinese county hospitals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 766–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Li, P.; Liu, D.; Zhang, X.; Tuo, H.; Lei, C.; Xie, X.; Gu, J.; Zhang, A. Characterization of Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacterial Strains from Animals and Humans in China. Microb. Drug Resist. 2019, 25, 1050–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jones-Dias, D.; Manageiro, V.; Francisco, A.P.; Martins, A.P.; Domingues, G.; Louro, D.; Ferreira, E.; Canica, M. Assessing the molecular basis of transferable quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. from food-producing animals and food products. Vet. Microbiol. 2013, 167, 523–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Albrechtova, K.; Papousek, I.; De Nys, H.; Pauly, M.; Anoh, E.; Mossoun, A.; Dolejska, M.; Masarikova, M.; Metzger, S.; Couacy-Hymann, E.; et al. Low Rates of Antimicrobial-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Wildlife in Tai National Park, Cote d’Ivoire, Surrounded by Villages with High Prevalence of Multiresistant ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli in People and Domestic Animals. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gibson, J.S.; Cobbold, R.N.; Heisig, P.; Sidjabat, H.E.; Kyaw-Tanner, M.T.; Trott, D.J. Identification of Qnr and AAC(6′)-1b-cr plasmid-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance determinants in multidrug-resistant Enterobacter spp. isolated from extraintestinal infections in companion animals. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 143, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yang, F.; Shen, C.; Zheng, X.B.; Liu, Y.; Ahmed, M.A.E.; Zhao, Z.H.; Liao, K.; Shi, Y.L.; Guo, X.; Zhong, R.X.; et al. Plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-1 in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from market retail fruits in Guangzhou, China. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 385–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Nayme, K.; Barguigua, A.; Bouchrif, B.; Diawara, I.; El Otmani, F.; Elmdaghri, N.; Zerouali, K.; Timinouni, M. Occurrence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, AmpC and virulence genes in Escherichia coli isolates from vegetable salads in Morocco. Br. Food J. 2017, 119, 1633–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, J.; Wang, T.; Shao, B.; Shen, J.Z.; Wang, S.C.; Wu, Y.N. Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance Genes and Antibiotic Residues in Wastewater and Soil Adjacent to Swine Feedlots: Potential Transfer to Agricultural Lands. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 1144–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Vaz-Moreira, I.; Varela, A.R.; Pereira, T.V.; Fochat, R.C.; Manaia, C.M. Multidrug Resistance in Quinolone-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated from Hospital Effluent and the Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant. Microb. Drug Resist. 2016, 22, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Daniela, F.; Kayode, F.; Aurora, G.-F.; Laura, V.; Alessandra, C. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance and β-lactamases in Escherichia coli from healthy animals from Nigeria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 1269–1272. [Google Scholar]
  21. Veldman, K.; Kant, A.; Dierikx, C.; van Essen-Zandbergen, A.; Wit, B.; Mevius, D. Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins and quinolones in fresh culinary herbs imported from Southeast Asia. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 177, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, J.; Park, K.Y.; Park, H.K.; Hwang, H.S.; Seo, M.R.; Kim, B.; Cho, Y.; Rho, M.; Pai, H. High fecal carriage of bla(CTX-M), bla(CMY-2), and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes among healthy Korean people in a metagenomic analysis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 5874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, T.; Zeng, Z.; Rao, L.; Chen, X.; He, D.; Lv, L.; Wang, J.; Zeng, L.; Feng, M.; Liu, J.H. The association between occurrence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance and ciprofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli isolates of different origins. Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 170, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Y.; Li, X.Y.; Wan, L.G.; Jiang, W.Y.; Yang, J.H.; Li, F.Q. Virulence and transferability of resistance determinants in a novel Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 1137 in China. Microb. Drug Resist. 2014, 20, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mirzaii, M.; Jamshidi, S.; Zamanzadeh, M.; Marashifard, M.; Hosseini, S.A.A.M.; Haeili, M.; Jahanbin, F.; Mansouri, F.; Darban-Sarokhalil, D.; Khoramrooz, S.S. Determination of gyrA and parC mutations and prevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from patients with urinary tract infection in Iran. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 13, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pasom, W.; Chanawong, A.; Lulitanond, A.; Wilailuckana, C.; Kenprom, S.; Puang-Ngern, P. Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance Genes, aac (6)-Ib-cr, qnrS, qnrB, and qnrA, in Urinary Isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae at a Teaching Hospital, Thailand. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 66, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Karah, N.; Poirel, L.; Bengtsson, S.; Sundqvist, M.; Kahlmeter, G.; Nordmann, P.; Sundsfjord, A. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants qnr and aac(6′)-Ib-cr in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. from Norway and Sweden. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2010, 66, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ni, Q.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, C.; Dong, D.; Li, Z.; Mao, E.; Peng, Y. Prevalence and quinolone resistance of fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in 6 communities and 2 physical examination center populations in Shanghai, China. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 86, 428–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Liu, B.; Wu, H.; Zhai, Y.; He, Z.; Sun, H.; Cai, T.; He, D.; Liu, J.; Wang, S.; Pan, Y.; et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of oqxAB in clinical Escherichia coli isolates from companion animals and humans in Henan Province, China. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2018, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wang, J.; Zhi, C.P.; Chen, X.J.; Guo, Z.W.; Liu, W.L.; Luo, J.; Huang, X.Y.; Zeng, L.; Huang, J.W.; Xia, Y.B.; et al. Characterization of oqxAB in Escherichia coli Isolates from Animals, Retail Meat, and Human Patients in Guangzhou, China. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Cheng, L.; Cao, X.-L.; Zhang, Z.-F.; Ning, M.-z.; Xu, X.-J.; Zhou, W.; Chen, J.-H.; Zhang, J.-H.; Shen, H.; Zhang, K. Clonal dissemination of KPC-2 producing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST11 clone with high prevalence of oqxAB and rmtB in a tertiary hospital in China: Results from a 3-year period. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2016, 15, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Azargun, R.; Barhaghi, M.H.S.; Kafil, H.S.; Oskouee, M.A.; Sadeghi, V.; Memar, M.Y.; Ghotaslou, R. Frequency of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV mutations and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from urinary tract infections in Azerbaijan, Iran. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2019, 17, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bi, W.; Liu, H.; Dunstan, R.A.; Li, B.; Torres, V.V.L.; Cao, J.; Chen, L.; Wilksch, J.J.; Strugnell, R.A.; Lithgow, T.; et al. Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Causing Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections in China: Molecular Investigation of Antibiotic Resistance Determinants, Informing Therapy, and Clinical Outcomes. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhou, H.; Zhang, K.; Chen, W.; Chen, J.; Zheng, J.; Liu, C.; Cheng, L.; Zhou, W.; Shen, H.; Cao, X. Epidemiological characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae collected from 17 hospitals in Nanjing district of China. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2020, 9, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ruiz, E.; Sáenz, Y.; Zarazaga, M.; Rocha-Gracia, R.; Martínez-Martínez, L.; Arlet, G.; Torres, C. qnr, aac(6′)-Ib-cr and qepA genes in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp.: Genetic environments and plasmid and chromosomal location. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 886–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rodríguez-Martínez, J.M.; Díaz de Alba, P.; Briales, A.; Machuca, J.; Lossa, M.; Fernández-Cuenca, F.; Rodríguez Baño, J.; Martínez-Martínez, L. Contribution of OqxAB efflux pumps to quinolone resistance in extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 68, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lu, X.; Hu, Y.; Luo, M.; Zhou, H.; Wang, X.; Du, Y.; Li, Z.; Xu, J.; Zhu, B.; Xu, X.; et al. MCR-1.6, a New MCR Variant Carried by an IncP Plasmid in a Colistin-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Isolate from a Healthy Individual. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e02632-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Hu, Y.; Yang, X.; Li, J.; Lv, N.; Liu, F.; Wu, J.; Lin, I.Y.; Wu, N.; Weimer, B.C.; Gao, G.F.; et al. The Bacterial Mobile Resistome Transfer Network Connecting the Animal and Human Microbiomes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 6672–6681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Todorovic, D.; Velhner, M.; Milanov, D.; Vidanovic, D.; Suvajdzic, L.; Stojanov, I.; Krnjaic, D. Characterization of tetracycline resistance of salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar infantis isolated from poultry in the northern part of serbia. Acta Vet.-Beogr. 2015, 65, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Deiss, R.G.; Bolaris, M.; Wang, A.; Filler, S.G. Cryptococcus gattii Meningitis Complicated by Listeria monocytogenes Infection. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016, 22, 1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Gorrie, C.L.; Holt, K.E. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Antibiotics 11 00015 g001 550
Figure 1. Antimicrobial-resistance phenotypes of the 125 bacterial isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was assessed using the following antimicrobial agents: amikacin (AK), amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC), ampicillin-sulbactam (SAM), aztreonam (ATM), cefazolin (CFZ), cefepime (FEP), cefoperazone-sulbactam (SCP), cefoxitin (FOX), ceftazidime (FEP), ceftriaxone (AXO), cefuroxime (CXM), chloramphenicol (CHL), CIP, colistin (COL), ertapenem (ETP), fosfomycin with G6P (FOS), gentamicin (GEN), imipenem (IMI), levofloxacin (LVX), meropenem (MEC), minocycline (MIN), moxifloxacin (MXF), nitrofurantoin (FD), norfloxacin (NOR), piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), tetracycline (TET), tigecycline (TGC), tobramycin (TOB), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT).
Figure 1. Antimicrobial-resistance phenotypes of the 125 bacterial isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was assessed using the following antimicrobial agents: amikacin (AK), amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC), ampicillin-sulbactam (SAM), aztreonam (ATM), cefazolin (CFZ), cefepime (FEP), cefoperazone-sulbactam (SCP), cefoxitin (FOX), ceftazidime (FEP), ceftriaxone (AXO), cefuroxime (CXM), chloramphenicol (CHL), CIP, colistin (COL), ertapenem (ETP), fosfomycin with G6P (FOS), gentamicin (GEN), imipenem (IMI), levofloxacin (LVX), meropenem (MEC), minocycline (MIN), moxifloxacin (MXF), nitrofurantoin (FD), norfloxacin (NOR), piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), tetracycline (TET), tigecycline (TGC), tobramycin (TOB), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT).
Antibiotics 11 00015 g001
Antibiotics 11 00015 g002 550
Figure 2. Heatmap showing the diversity profiles of drug resistance genes in the 39 PMQR gene-positive isolates.
Figure 2. Heatmap showing the diversity profiles of drug resistance genes in the 39 PMQR gene-positive isolates.
Antibiotics 11 00015 g002
Table
Table 1. PMQR gene combinations in 125 bacterial isolates.
Table 1. PMQR gene combinations in 125 bacterial isolates.
Bacterial StrainsNo. of Isolates with Detected PMQR Gene a
qnraacoqxA+
oqxB		qnr+
oqxA+
oqxB		qnr+
aac		oqxA+
oqxB+
aac		aac+
qnr+
oqxA+
oqxB		Total in Every Species, n (%)
E. coli (n = 112)3 (2.7)7 (6.3)11 (9.8)1 (0.9)3 (2.7)1 (0.89)0 (0.0)26 (23.2)
K. pneumoniae (n = 10)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (10)4 (40)1 (10)1 (10)3 (30)10 (100)
P. mirabilis (n = 2)0 (0.0)2 (100)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)2 (100)
C. braakii (n = 1)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (100)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (100)
Total (125)3 (2.4)9 (7.2)12 (9.6)5 (4.0)5 (4.0)2 (1.6)3 (2.4)39 (31.2)
a aac, aac(6′)-Ib-cr.
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of PMQR and other resistance genes in the plasmids of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates.
Table 2. Characteristics of PMQR and other resistance genes in the plasmids of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates.
StrainsIncompatibility Group plasMINds and the Carrying Resistant GenesResistant Genes on ChromosomePoint Mutations of DNA Topoisomerase IV and GyraseMDR Phenotype
K. pneumoniae
H93IncR: qnrS; sul1; tet(A); dfrA1
IncX1: floR		OqxA, oqxB; fosA-CIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, TET, CHL, SXT
H165IncN:aac(6′)-Ib-cr, qnrB6; sul1; aadA16; tet(A); dfrA27; ARR-3
IncHI2A: -		blaPLA2a; fosA-CIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, TET, SXT
H204IncHI1B:qnrA; aac(3)-IId, aadA5; catA1; mph(A); sul1, sul2, tet(D); dfrA17
IncHI2A: -		OqxA, oqxB; blaSHV-110, blaSHV-81;fosA-CIP, GEN, LVX, MXF, NOR, MIN, CHL, FD, TET, SXT
H221IncFIB: aac(3)-IId, aph(3′)-Ia
IncHI2A: -
IncFIB: -		OqxA, oqxB; blaSHV-187; fosA-CIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, MIN, TET, CHL, GEN, FD, SXT
H224IncR: aac(6′)-Ib-cr, qnrB6; aadA16; floR; sul1; tet(D); ARR-3; dfrA27OqxA, oqxB; fosA-CIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, SAM, TET, MIN, CHL, SXT
H233IncFIB: aac(6′)-Ib-cr; blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1, blaTEM-1B; aadA2; catB3; mph(A); sul1; tet(A); dfrA12OqxA, oqxB; fosA-CIP, NOR, MXF, LVX, SAM, ATM, CFZ, CAZ, AXO, CXM, TET, TOB, SXT
H234IncR: aac(6′)-Ib-cr, qnrB52; aac(3)-IId, aadA16, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(3′)-Ia, aph(6)-Id; floR; mph(A); sul; tet(A); dfrA27; ARR-3
IncFIB: -		oqxA, oqxB; fosA-CIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, TET, CHL, GEN, FD, SXT
H249IncR: qnrS1; sul1; tet(A); dfrA1
IncHI2A: -
IncL/M(pOXA-48): -		oqxA, oqxB; fosA-CIP, LVX, MXF, NOR, FOX, CXM, TET, MIN, CHL, FD, SXT
H251IncR: aac(6′)-Ib-cr, qnrB91, aadA16; floR; sul1; tet(D); dfrA27; ARR-3
IncFIB: -
IncHI1B: -		oqxA, oqxB; fosA-CIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, MIN, TET, CHL, FD, SXT
E. coli
H8IncFII:aac(6′)-Ib-cr; blaOXA-1; aadA5; catA1, catB3; mph(A); sul1; tet(B); dfrA17
IncB: -
IncO: -
IncK: -
IncZ: -		mdf(A)parC; gyrA; parECIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, SAM, TET, TOB, SXT
H32IncFIB: oqxA, oqxB; aac(3)-IId, aadA2; floR; dfrA12; tet(A)
IncFII(29): -		mdf(A)gyrA; parCCHL, CIP, LVX, MXF, NOR, TET, GEN, TOB
H40IncFIB: oqxA, oqxB; aac(3)-IId, aadA, aadA2, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(6)-Id; cmlA1, floR; sul3; tet(A); dfrA12mdf(A)gyrA; parE; parCCHL, CIP, GEN, FD, MXF, LVX, NOR, TET, TOB, SXT
H45IncFII: aac(6′)-Ib-cr, oqxA, oqxB; blaCTX-M-55; aac(6′)-Ib3, aadA5; floR; sul2; tet(A); dfrA17; fosA3mdf(A)gyrA; parCCHL, CIP, MXF, LVX, NOR, ATM, CFZ, AXO, CXM, TET, TOB, FOS, SXT
H58IncFIB: qnrS13; dfrA14; tet(A); floR
IncHI2: oqxA, oqxB, qnrS2; blaCTX-M-65; sul1; tet(A)		mdf(A)gyrA; parCCIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, ATM, AXO, CFZ, CXM, TE, CHL
H62p0111: blaOXA-10; aadA1; tet(A); dfrA14; sul2; floR, cmlA1; ARR-2
IncI1: aac(6′)-Ib-cr; blaCTX-M-14b; aadA16; sul; floR; dfrA27; ARR-3
IncI2: mcr-1.1
IncFIB: -
IncFII: -
Col(MG828): -		mdf(A)parE; parC; gyrACIP, LVX, MXF, NOR, SAM, CFZ, FEP, AXO, CXM, TET, CHL, TOB, SXT, COL
H66IncFIB: blaTEM-1B; aadA5, aac(3)-IId, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(6)-Id; mph(A); sul2, sul1; tet(A)
IncHI1A: -
IncHI1B: -
IncX9: -		aac(6′)-Ib-cr, qnrS2; blaCTX-M-65, blaOXA-1; floR, catB3; mdf(A); ARR-3parC; gyrACIP, LVX, MXF, NOR, SAM, ATM, CFZ, AXO, CXM, TET, CHL, GEN, TOB, SXT
H68IncN: blaCARB-2; aac(3)-IId, aadA1, aadA2b, aph(3′)-Ia; sul3; tet(M); cmlA1, floR; dfrA17
IncFII: qnrS1; blaTEM-1B; floR; mph(A), erm(B)
IncX1: aph(3″)-Ib, aph(6)-Id; tet(B)
IncX4: mcr-1.1		mdf(A)parC; gyrACIP, NOR, MXF, LVX, SAM, CHL, MIN, TET, GEN, TOB, SXT, COL
H74IncFIB:oqxA, oqxB; aph(3′)-Ia, aph(4)-Ia, aac(3)-IV, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(3′)-Ia, aph(6)-Id; mph(A); sul2; tet(A); dfrA12; floR
IncFII: blaCTX-M-55; fosA3		-gyrA; parCCIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, SAM, ATM, FEP, CFZ, AXO, CXM, TET, CHL, GEN, TOB, FOS
H84IncR: oqxA, oqxB; blaTEM-1B; floRmdf(A)parC; gyrACIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, TET, CHL
H91IncFIA-IncHI1B-IncQ1: qnrB6, aac(6′)-Ib-cr; aph(3′)-Ia, aac(3)-IId, aadA16, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(6)-Id; sul2; tet(B), tet(M); dfrA27; ARR-3
IncI1: floR
IncX1: -
Col440II: -		blaTEM-1B; mdf(A), mph(A)gyrA; parE; parCCIP, LVX, MXF, NOR, SAM, CFZ, SCP, AXO, CXM, MIN, TET, CHL, GEN, TOB, SXT
H104IncA/C2: oqxA, oqxB; blaCMY-2; sul1, sul2; aac(6′)-Il, aph(6)-Id, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(3′)-Ia; mph(A); tet(A)
IncFII/IncN: blaCTX-M-55
Col156: -		mdf(A)gyrA; parCCIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, AMC, SAM, ATM, FEP, CFZ, FOX, SCP, CAZ, AXO, CXM, TET, CHL, TOB, FOS, SXT
H108IncFIA: aac(6′)-Ib-cr; blaOXA-1, blaCTX-M-15; aadA5; catB3; mph(A); sul1; tet(A); dfrA17
Col440II: -		mdf(A)parE; gyrA; parCCIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, FEP, SAM, ATM, CFZ, SCP, CAZ, AXO, CXM, TET, TOB, SXT
H114IncFIB: oqxA, oqxB; blaCTX-M-55; aadA5, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(6)-Id; sul2; tet(A); dfrA17; floRmdf(A)gyrA; parCCIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, ATM, CFZ, FEP, CAZ, AXO, CXM, TET, CHL, SXT
H115IncN: oqxA, oqxB; blaTEM-1C; aadA2, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(6)-Id; floR; mph(A); sul2; tet(A); dfrA12
Col440I: -		mdf(A)gyrA; parCCIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, TET, CHL, SXT
H133IncFII-IncN: oqxA, oqxB; blaCTX-M-55; aph(3″)-Ib, aph(3′)-IIa, aph(6)-Id; floR; sul2; tet(A); dfrA14
Col(MG828): -		-parC; gyrACIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, ATM, CFZ, FEP, CAZ, AXO, CXM, TET, CHL, FD, SXT
H167IncFIB: qnrS1; floR; tet(A); dfrA14mdf(A)gyrA; parCCIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, TET, CHL
H175IncFIA: aadA5; mph(A); sul1; tet(A); dfrA17aac(6′)-Ib-cr; blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1; catB3; aac(3)-IIa; mdf(A)parC; gyrA; parECIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, ATM, CFZ, FEP, CAZ, AXO, CXM, TET, GEN, TOB, SXT
H176IncFIA: aadA5; mph(A); sul; tet(A); dfrA17
IncFII: -		aac(6′)-Ib-cr;blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1; catB3; aac(3)-IIa; mdf(A)gyrA; parE; parCCIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, ATM, CFZ, FEP, CAZ, AXO, CXM, TET, GEN, TOB, SXT
H205IncFIC: qnrS; blaTEM-1B; aph(3″)-Ib, aph(6)-Id; sul; tet(A); dfrA14mdf(A)parE; gyrA; parCCIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, SAM, CFZ, FOX, AXO, CXM, TET, SXT
H225IncFIA: aac(6′)-Ib-cr; blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1; aadA5, aac(3)-IIa; catB3; sul; dfrA17; mph(A)
IncN:qnrS1; blaTEM-1B; mph(A)
IncL/M: -		mdf(A); tet(B)gyrA; parC; parECIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, SAM, ATM, CFZ, FEP, CAZ, AXO, CXM, TET, GEN, TOB, SCP
H226RepA: aac(6′)-Ib-cr; blaOXA-1, blaTEM-1B; aac(3)-IIa, aadA2b; catA2, catB3, cmlA; ere(A); sul1, sul2; tet(D); dfrA19; fosA3; ARR-3
IncX1: -		mdf(A)gyrA; parCCIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, SAM, TET, CHL, GEN, TOB, SXT
H227RepA: aac(6′)-Ib-cr; blaOXA-1, blaTEM-1B; aac(3)-IIa, aadA2b; catA2, catB3, cmlA; ere(A); tet(D); sul1, sul2; dfrA19; fosA3; ARR-3
IncX1: -		mdf(A)gyrA; parCCIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, SAM, TET, CHL, GEN, TOB, SXT
H238IncQ1:oqxA, oqxB; blaTEM-1B, blaCTX-M-27; aph(3″)-Ib, aph(3′)-Ia, aph(6)-Id; catA1; sul2; tet(B); dfrA17
IncFIB: -		-gyrA; parCCIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, ATM, CFZ, FEP, AXO, CXM, CHL, TET, SXT
H240IncQ1: -oqxA, oqxB; blaTEM-1B; aadA5, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(6)-Id; tet(A); mdf(A); sul2; dfrA17gyrA; parCCIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, SAM, TET, FD, SXT
H250IncFIB: oqxA, oqxB; blaTEM-1B; aac(3)-IId, aadA2; mph(A), tet(A); dfrA12
IncI1: floR; sul2		mdf(A)parC; gyrA; parECIP, LVX, NOR, MXF, NOR, CHL, TET, GE, TOB, FD, SXT
C. braakii
H138IncR:qnrB6, aac(6′)-Ib-cr; aadA16, aph(6)-Id; mph(A); sul1; tet(A); dfrA27; ARR-3; floR--CIP, LVX, MFX, NOR, AMC, CFZ, FOX, TET, CHL, SXT
MDR: multidrug resistance. This is defined in a strain as resistance to more than three different antibiotics. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was assessed in the PMQR isolates using the following antimicrobial agents: amikacin (AK), amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC), ampicillin-sulbactam (SAM), aztreonam (ATM), cefazolin (CFZ), cefepime (FEP), cefoperazone-sulbactam (SCP), cefoxitin (FOX), ceftazidime (FEP), ceftriaxone (AXO), cefuroxime (CXM), chloramphenicol (CHL), CIP, colistin (COL), ertapenem (ETP), fosfomycin with G6P (FOS), gentamicin (GEN), imipenem (IMI), levofloxacin (LVX), meropenem (MEC), minocycline (MIN), moxifloxacin (MXF), nitrofurantoin (FD), norfloxacin (NOR), piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), tetracycline (TET), tigecycline (TGC), tobramycin (TOB), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT). The Plasmidfinder detection results (Table 2) showed that, apart from two P. mirabilis strains, one to six plasmid replicon types were present in all strains. In all 39 PMQR gene-positive isolates, the highest detection rate was for IncFIB (n = 15), followed by IncFII (n = 9), IncR (n = 7), IncN (n = 6), and IncFIA (n = 5). We sequenced all 39 PMQR gene-positive strains, yielding 31 complete sequences and two draft sequences of the PMQR gene plasmids, additionally, two E. coli strains possessed two PMQR gene plasmids. The PMQR genes were located on the chromosome in four E. coli strains, two P. mirabilis strains, and one K. pneumoniae strain. The location of the PMQR gene could not be determined in one K. pneumoniae strain. The PMQR genes were detected both on plasmids and the chromosome in seven K. pneumoniae strains. The complete sequences of seven IncFIB, six IncR, three IncN, three IncFII, two IncFIA, two RepA, one IncQ1, one IncFIA-IncHI1B-IncQ, one IncFII- IncN, one IncHI1B, one IncHI2, one IncFIC, and one IncI1 PMQR-harboring plasmid were obtained, with lengths of 59,494–224,070, 53,007–96,613, 49,618–168,792, 25,700–141,489, 123,952–167,131, 250,898, 161,298, 290,674, 126,885, 285,541, 233,321, 118,361, and 115,027 bp, respectively. Seven IncFIB PMQR plasmids carried 5–12 resistance genes, six IncR PMQR plasmids carried 4–13 resistance genes, three IncN PMQR plasmids carried 2–11 resistance genes, three IncFII PMQR plasmids carried 4–11 resistance genes, two IncFIA PMQR plasmids carried nine resistance genes, two RepA PMQR plasmids carried 15 resistance genes, one IncQ1 PMQR plasmid carried 11 resistance genes, one IncFIA-IncHI1B-IncQ1 PMQR plasmid carried 12 resistance genes, one IncFII-IncN PMQR plasmid carried 10 resistance genes, one IncHI1B PMQR plasmid carried 10 resistance genes, one IncHI2 PMQR plasmid carried six resistance genes, one IncFIC PMQR plasmid carried four resistance genes, and one IncI1 PMQR plasmid carried six resistance genes. The highest detection rates in K. pneumoniae were for IncFIB (50%, 5/10) and IncR (50%, 5/10). The aac(6′)-Ib-cr and qnr genes were mostly located on the IncFIB plasmid (5/10, 50%). All oqxA and oqxB genes were located on the K. pneumoniae chromosome (except for K. pneumoniae H48 where the location was not defined). In five K. pneumoniae isolates, the aac(6′)-Ib-cr and qnr genes coexisted with aadA16, dfrA1, dfrA27, sul1, tet(A), tet(D), floR, and ARR-3 resistance genes on the IncR plasmid. In E. coli, IncFIB (10/26, 37.0%) and IncFII (9/26, 34.6%) were the main replicon types, and the PMQR genes were mainly located on IncFIB (7/26, 26.9%) and IncFII (5/26, 19.2%). In seven E. coli isolates, oqxA, oqxB, and qnr coexisted with aadA2, aac(3)-IId, aph(6)-Id, aph(3″)-Ib, catA1, catB3, floR, sul2, tet(A), mph(A), dfrA12, dfrA17, and floR resistance genes on the IncFIB plasmid. In five E. coli isolates, oqxA, oqxB, aac(6′)-Ib-cr, and qnr coexisted with blaCTX-M-55, blaTEM-1B, aadA5, aph(6)-Id, aph(3″)-Ib, sul2, dfrA14, dfrA17, tet(A), mph(A), and floR resistance genes on the IncFII plasmid. In three E. coli isolates, aac(6′)-Ib-cr and qnr coexisted with blaOXA-1, aadA5, sul1, dfrA17, tet(A), catB3, and mph(A) resistance genes on the IncFIA plasmid.
Table
Table 3. Concordance rate between drug resistance genes and drug resistance phenotypes.
Table 3. Concordance rate between drug resistance genes and drug resistance phenotypes.
Drug Resistance aK. pneumoniaeE. coli
CIP100%100%
NOR0%\
FEP 40%69.20%
FOX90%100.00%
CAZ50%65.40%
AXO30%\
AMC90%\
TZP90%53.80%
ATM50%\
TET70%100%
TGC60%100%
MIN30%\
CHL90%76.90%
AK50%53.80%
GEN100%100%
TOB40%100%
ETP100%100%
IMI100%100%
MEC100%100%
FOS10%92.30%
SXT90%88.40%
COL \100%
a Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was assessed using the following antimicrobial agents: amikacin (AK), amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC), ampicillin-sulbactam (SAM), aztreonam (ATM), cefazolin (CFZ), cefepime (FEP), cefoperazone-sulbactam (SCP), cefoxitin (FOX), ceftazidime (FEP), ceftriaxone (AXO), cefuroxime (CXM), chloramphenicol (CHL), CIP, colistin (COL), ertapenem (ETP), fosfomycin with G6P (FOS), gentamicin (GEN), imipenem (IMI), levofloxacin (LVX), meropenem (MEC), minocycline (MIN), moxifloxacin (MXF), nitrofurantoin (FD), norfloxacin (NOR), piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), tetracycline (TET), tigecycline (TGC), tobramycin (TOB), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Long, Y.; Lu, X.; Ni, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, M.; Li, X.; Li, Z.; Zhou, H.; Li, Z.; Wu, K.; et al. High Carriage Rate of the Multiple Resistant Plasmids Harboring Quinolone Resistance Genes in Enterobacter spp. Isolated from Healthy Individuals. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11010015

AMA Style

Long Y, Lu X, Ni X, Liu J, Wang M, Li X, Li Z, Zhou H, Li Z, Wu K, et al. High Carriage Rate of the Multiple Resistant Plasmids Harboring Quinolone Resistance Genes in Enterobacter spp. Isolated from Healthy Individuals. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11010015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Long, Yongyan, Xin Lu, Xiansheng Ni, Jiaqi Liu, Mengyu Wang, Xu Li, Zhe Li, Haijian Zhou, Zhenpeng Li, Kui Wu, and et al. 2022. "High Carriage Rate of the Multiple Resistant Plasmids Harboring Quinolone Resistance Genes in Enterobacter spp. Isolated from Healthy Individuals" Antibiotics 11, no. 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11010015

APA Style

Long, Y., Lu, X., Ni, X., Liu, J., Wang, M., Li, X., Li, Z., Zhou, H., Li, Z., Wu, K., Wang, W., Yang, L., Xu, J., Chen, H., & Kan, B. (2022). High Carriage Rate of the Multiple Resistant Plasmids Harboring Quinolone Resistance Genes in Enterobacter spp. Isolated from Healthy Individuals. Antibiotics, 11(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11010015

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop