Randomized Clinical Trial of the Need for Antibiotic Treatment for Low-Risk Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Caused by Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Study Population
2.2. Primary Outcome
2.3. Secondary Outcomes
2.4. Screening Failure
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Setting
4.2. Study Design
4.3. Study Population
- -
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- -
- Growth of CoNS of the species Staphylococcus lugdunensis
- -
- Patients whose catheter had not been removed in the 72 h prior to inclusion
- -
- Patients with moderate-to-severe valvular heart disease
- -
- Patients with compromised immunity or neutropenia < 500 Ne/uL
- -
- Hemodynamically unstable patients presenting as septic shock
- -
- Patients with evidence of septic thrombophlebitis or distant infection
- -
- Patients with artificial endovascular or articular devices
- -
- Patients with permanent or long-term catheters
- -
- Any circumstance that, at the discretion of the physician responsible, might entail a clinical risk, might negatively affect the patient’s participation in the study, or might interfere with the evaluations
- -
- Fever originating more than 72 h prior to catheter removal.
4.4. Safety Data
4.5. Definitions [23]
- (1)
- Quantitative hemocultures with detection of the same microorganism, with a proportion of 5:1 or more between the blood obtained from the lumens of a central venous catheter (CVC) or a peripheral-inserted central catheter (PICC), and that obtained from a peripheral vein.
- (2)
- Semi-quantitative culture (>15 UFC/catheter segment) or quantitative (>103 UFC/catheter segment) with detection of the same microorganism (at species level with identical antibiogram) as in the hemocultures obtained from peripheral blood.
- (3)
- Time to positivity of the hemocultures above two hours between the hemocultures obtained from blood from a peripheral vein and those obtained from the lumen of a venous catheter.
- (4)
- Presence of inflammatory signs or of purulent secretion at the point of insertion or in the path of the subcutaneous tunnel of a venous catheter of any type.
- (5)
- Resolution of the clinical signs and symptoms after the removal of a CVC or PICC or a suitable antibiotic treatment.
- -
- Low-risk catheter-related bloodstream infection: CRBSI in a hemodynamically stable, immunocompetent and with lack of risk factors for local or distant complications.
- -
- Complicated bacteremia: evidence of distant infection or septic thrombophlebitis.
- -
- Persistent bacteremia: detection of CoNS growth 48 h after randomization.
- -
- Microbiological cure: lack of growth in blood cultures.
4.6. Endpoints
4.7. Sample Size
4.8. Microbiology Studies
4.9. Statistical Analysis
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pérez-Granda, M.J.; Guembe, M.; Rincón, C.; Muñoz, P.; Bouza, E. A prevalence survey of intravascular catheter use in a general hospital. J. Vasc. Access 2014, 15, 524–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guembe, M.; Pérez-Granda, M.J.; Capdevila, J.A.; Barberán, J.; Pinilla, B.; Martín-Rabadán, P.; Bouza, E.; Millán, J.; Pérez de Oteyza, C.; Muiño, A.; et al. Nationwide study on peripheral-venous-catheter-associated-bloodstream infections in internal medicine departments. J. Hosp. Infect. 2017, 97, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wisplinghoff, H.; Bischoff, T.; Tallent, S.M.; Seifert, H.; Wenzel, R.P.; Edmond, M.B. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: Analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 39, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarb, P.; Coignard, B.; Griskeviciene, J.; Muller, A.; Vankerckhoven, V.; Weist, K.; Goossens, M.M.; Vaerenberg, S.; Hopkins, S.; Catry, B.; et al. The european centre for disease prevention and control (ECDC) pilot point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use. Eurosurveillance 2012, 17, 20316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maki, D.G.; Kluger, D.M.; Crnich, C.J. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: A systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2006, 81, 1159–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weiner, L.M.; Webb, A.K.; Limbago, B.; Dudeck, M.A.; Patel, J.; Kallen, A.J.; Edwards, J.R.; Sievert, D.M. Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens Associated With Healthcare-Associated Infections: Summary of Data Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011–2014. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2016, 37, 1288–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Becker, K.; Heilmann, C.; Peters, G. Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 870–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badia-Cebada, L.; Peñafiel, J.; Patrick, P.; Andrés, M.; Càmara, J.; Domenech, D.; Jiménez-Martínez, E.; Marrón, A.; Moreno, E.; Pomar, V.; et al. Trends in the Epidemiology of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections Towards a Paradigm Shift. Eurosurveillance 2022, 27, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mermel, L.A.; Allon, M.; Bouza, E.; Craven, D.E.; Flynn, P.; O’Grady, N.P.; Raad, I.I.; Rijnders, B.J.A.; Sherertz, R.J.; Warren, D.K. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 49, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lebeaux, D.; Fernández-Hidalgo, N.; Chauhan, A.; Lee, S.; Ghigo, J.M.; Almirante, B.; Beloin, C. Management of infections related to totally implantable venous-access ports: Challenges and perspectives. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 146–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raad, I.; Hanna, H.; Maki, D. Intravascular catheter-related infections: Advances in diagnosis, prevention, and management. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2007, 7, 645–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- O’Grady, N.P.; Alexander, M.; Burns, L.A.; Dellinger, E.P.; Garland, J.; Heard, S.O.; Lipsett, P.A.; Masur, H.; Mermel, L.A.; Pearson, M.L.; et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Am. J. Infect. Control 2011, 39, S1–S34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaves, F.; Garnacho-Montero, J.; del Pozo, J.L.; Bouza, E.; Capdevila, J.A.; de Cueto, M.; Domínguez, M.Á.; Esteban, J.; Fernández-Hidalgo, N.; Fernández Sampedro, M.; et al. Executive summary: Diagnosis and Treatment of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection: Clinical Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (SEIMC) and the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC). Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2018, 36, 112–119. [Google Scholar]
- Lutwick, L.; Al-Maani, A.S.; Mehtar, S.; Memish, Z.; Rosenthal, V.D.; Dramowski, A.; Lui, G.; Osman, T.; Bulabula, A.; Bearman, G. Managing and preventing vascular catheter infections: A position paper of the international society for infectious diseases. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 84, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timsit, J.F.; Baleine, J.; Bernard, L.; Calvino-Gunther, S.; Darmon, M.; Dellamonica, J.; Desruennes, E.; Leone, M.; Lepape, A.; Leroy, O.; et al. Expert consensus-based clinical practice guidelines management of intravascular catheters in the intensive care unit. Ann. Intensive Care 2020, 10, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cui, J.; Liang, Z.; Mo, Z.; Zhang, J. The species distribution, antimicrobial resistance and risk factors for poor outcome of coagulase-negative staphylococci bacteraemia in China. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.Y.; Kwon, K.H.; Chung, J.W.; Huh, H.J.; Chae, S.L. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia: Risk factors for mortality and impact of initial appropriate antimicrobial therapy on outcome. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015, 34, 1395–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raad, I.; Kassar, R.; Ghannam, D.; Chaftari, A.M.; Hachem, R.; Jiang, Y. Management of the catheter in documented catheter-related coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia: Remove or retain? Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 49, 1187–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- San-Juan, R.; Martínez-Redondo, I.; Fernández-Ruiz, M.; Ruiz-Ruigómez, M.; Corbella, L.; Hernández-Jiménez, P.; Silva, J.T.; López-Medrano, F.; Recio, R.; Orellana, M.Á.; et al. A short course of antibiotic treatment is safe after catheter withdrawal in catheter-related bloodstream infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 38, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olaechea, P.M.; Álvarez-Lerma, F.; Palomar, M.; Insausti, J.; López-Pueyo, M.J.; Martínez-Pellús, A.; Cantón, M.L. Impacto de la bacteriemia primaria y relacionada con catéterintravascular causadapor Staphylococcus coagulasa negativo enpacientes críticos. Med. Intensiv. 2011, 35, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molina, J.; Peñuela, I.; Lepe, J.A.; Gutiérrez-Pizarraya, A.; Gómez, M.J.; García-Cabrera, E.; Cordero, E.; Aznar, J.; Pachón, J. Mortality and hospital stay related to coagulase-negative Staphylococci bacteremia in non-critical patients. J. Infect. 2013, 66, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hebeisen, U.P.; Atkinson, A.; Marschall, J.; Buetti, N. Catheter-related bloodstream infections with coagulase-negative staphylococci: Are antibiotics necessary if the catheter is removed? Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Programme at Catalan Hospitals (VINCat). 2015 Manual [Internet]. Available online: https://catsalut.gencat.cat/web/.content/minisite/vincat/documents/manuals/Manual-VINCat-2015-english.pdf (accessed on 6 April 2023).
- EUCAST. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters Version 10.0. Available online: https://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_10.0_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf (accessed on 6 April 2023).
- ICH E9 Expert Working Group. Statistical principles for clinical trials (ICH Harmonized tripartite guideline E9). Stat. Med. 1999, 18, 1903–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Intervention (%) N = 15 | Control (%) N = 12 | |
---|---|---|
Patient characteristics | ||
Age, mean | 64 | 59 |
Female sex | 8 (53.3) | 6 (50) |
Heart failure | 1 (7.1) | 0 |
Cirrhosis | 2 (14.3) | 1 (8.3) |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 1 (7.1) | 1 (8.3) |
Renal chronic failure | 2 (14.3) | 0 |
Charlson ≥ 4 | 12 (80) | 3 (25) |
Clinical presentation | ||
Sepsis | 1 (6.7) | 1 (8.3) |
Fever | 7 (46.7) | 10 (83.3) |
Local infection | 5 (33.3) | 3 (25) |
Catheter characteristics | ||
Days since insertion (median, IQR) | 11 days (7–15) | 11 days (8.7–14.2) |
Site of acquisition | ||
Medical ward | 5 (33.3) | 6 (50) |
Surgical ward | 10 (66.7) | 6 (50) |
Catheter type | ||
Midline | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0) |
CVC | 7 (46.7) | 5 (41.7) |
PICVC | 5 (33.3) | 6 (50) |
PVC | 2 (13.3) | 1 (8.3) |
Site of insertion | ||
Jugular | 6 (40) | 2 (16.7) |
Subclavian | 1 (6.7) | 2 (16.7) |
Basilic/cephalic vein | 6 (40) | 6 (50) |
Radial | 2 (13.3) | 2 (16.7) |
Use | ||
- parenteral nutrition | 10 (66.7) | 9 (75) |
- medication or serums | 5 (33.3) | 3 (25) |
Group | Failure | n | N (Total) | % | CI [95%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | No | 12 | 12 | 100.0 | [69.9–100] |
Control | Yes | 0 | 12 | 0.0 | [0–30.1] |
Intervention | No | 14 | 15 | 93.3 | [66–99.7] |
Intervention | Yes | 1 | 15 | 6.7 | [0.3–34] |
Group | Failure | n | N (Total) | % | CI [95%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | No | 12 | 12 | 100.0 | [69.9–100] |
Control | Yes | 0 | 12 | 0.0 | [0–30.1] |
Intervention | No | 12 | 13 | 92.3 | [62.1–99.6] |
Intervention | Yes | 1 | 13 | 7.7 | [0.4–37.9] |
Control Group | Intervention Group | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Secondary Variables | n | (%) | CI 95% | n | (%) | CI 95% | RR | CI 95% | p |
Persistent bacteraemia | 0 | 0.00 | [0–30.13] | 1 | 6.67 | [0.35–33.97] | . | . | . |
Complicated bacteraemia | 0 | 0.00 | [0–30.13] | 1 | 6.67 | [0.35–33.97] | . | . | . |
Treatment side-effect | 0 | 0.00 | [0–30.13] | 0 | 0 | [0–25.35] | . | . | . |
7-day mortality | 0 | 0.00 | [0–30.13] | 1 | 6.67 | [0.35–33.97] | . | . | . |
90-day mortality | 1 | 8.33 | [0.44–40.25] | 3 | 20.00 | [5.31–48.63] | 2.4 | [0.28–20.24] | 0.42 |
Time until microbiological cure (median, IQR) | 1.25 days | [0.5; 2.62] | 3 days | [1; 3] | |||||
Time until fever extinction (median, IQR) | 0 days | [0; 0] | 0 days | [0; 0] |
Control Group | Intervention Group | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Secondary Variables | n | (%) | CI 95% | n | (%) | CI 95% | RR | CI 95% | p |
Persistent bacteraemia | 0 | 0.00 | [0–30.13] | 1 | 7.69 | [0.4–37.91] | . | . | . |
Complicated bacteraemia | 0 | 0.00 | [0–30.13] | 1 | 7.69 | [0.4–37.91] | . | . | . |
Treatment side-effect | 0 | 0.00 | [0–30.13] | 0 | 0 | [0–28.34] | . | . | . |
7-day mortality | 0 | 0.00 | [0–30.13] | 1 | 7.69 | [0.4–37.91] | . | . | . |
90-day mortality | 1 | 8.33 | [0.44–40.25] | 3 | 23.08 | [6.16–54.02] | 2.77 | [0.33–23.14] | 0.34 |
Time until microbiological cure (median, IQR) | 1.25 days | [0.5; 2.62] | 1.5 days | [1; 3] | |||||
Time until fever extinction (median, IQR) | 0 days | [0; 0] | 0 days | [0; 0] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Badia-Cebada, L.; Carmezim, J.; Pérez-Rodríguez, M.-T.; Bereciartua, E.; López, L.-E.; Montenegro, M.R.; Pomar, V.; Andrés, M.; Petkova, E.; Sopena, N.; et al. Randomized Clinical Trial of the Need for Antibiotic Treatment for Low-Risk Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Caused by Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 839. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12050839
Badia-Cebada L, Carmezim J, Pérez-Rodríguez M-T, Bereciartua E, López L-E, Montenegro MR, Pomar V, Andrés M, Petkova E, Sopena N, et al. Randomized Clinical Trial of the Need for Antibiotic Treatment for Low-Risk Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Caused by Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(5):839. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12050839
Chicago/Turabian StyleBadia-Cebada, Laia, João Carmezim, María-Teresa Pérez-Rodríguez, Elena Bereciartua, Luis-Eduardo López, Marta Represa Montenegro, Virginia Pomar, Marta Andrés, Elizabet Petkova, Nieves Sopena, and et al. 2023. "Randomized Clinical Trial of the Need for Antibiotic Treatment for Low-Risk Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Caused by Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci" Antibiotics 12, no. 5: 839. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12050839
APA StyleBadia-Cebada, L., Carmezim, J., Pérez-Rodríguez, M. -T., Bereciartua, E., López, L. -E., Montenegro, M. R., Pomar, V., Andrés, M., Petkova, E., Sopena, N., Lora-Tamayo, J., Monsálvez, V., Ramirez-Hidalgo, M. F., Gómez-Zorrilla, S., Boix, L., Meije, Y., Jiménez, E., & Gasch, O. (2023). Randomized Clinical Trial of the Need for Antibiotic Treatment for Low-Risk Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Caused by Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. Antibiotics, 12(5), 839. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12050839