Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Clinical Phenotypes through Machine Learning of First-Line H. pylori Treatment in Europe during the Period 2013–2022: Data from the European Registry on H. pylori Management (Hp-EuReg)
Previous Article in Journal
Incidence of Drug-Resistant Hospital-Associated Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections, the Accompanying Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes with Treatment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Procalcitonin-Based Antibiotic Use for Neonatal Early-Onset Bacterial Infections: Pre- and Post-Intervention Clinical Study

1
Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo 1738610, Japan
2
Department of Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo 1738610, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2023, 12(9), 1426; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091426
Submission received: 12 August 2023 / Revised: 2 September 2023 / Accepted: 5 September 2023 / Published: 9 September 2023

Abstract

:
We previously reported the 95th percentile cutoff value of the serum procalcitonin (PCT) reference curve for diagnosing early-onset bacterial infection. We aimed to verify the effectivity of these novel diagnostic criteria by comparing antibiotic use and incidence of early-onset bacterial infection between pre- and post-introduction periods. We included newborns admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit who underwent blood tests within 72 h after birth between 2018 and 2022. The neonates were divided into the pre-intervention (admitted before the introduction, n = 737) or post-intervention (admitted after the introduction, n = 686) group. The days of antibiotics therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days up to 6 days after birth, percentage of antibiotic use, and incidence of early-onset bacterial infection were compared between the groups. The post-intervention group had significantly lower DOT per 1000 patient days (82.0 days vs. 211.3 days, p < 0.01) and percentage of newborns receiving antibiotics compared with the pre-intervention group (79 (12%) vs. 280 (38%), respectively, p < 0.01). The incidence of early-onset bacterial infections did not differ between the groups (2% each, p = 0.99). In conclusion, our diagnostic criteria using the 95th percentile cutoff value of the serum PCT reference curve for early-onset bacterial infection were proven safe and effective, promoting appropriate use of antibiotics.

1. Introduction

The increasing prevalence of drug-resistant bacteria populations, also known as antibiotic resistant bacteria (AMR), has become a global area of concern. Annually, approximately 700,000 individuals worldwide die from infections caused by AMR, and by 2050, the emergence of new AMR is projected to lead to an annual death of 10 million people worldwide unless proactive actions are taken to mitigate its spread. The worldwide economic cost of AMR by 2050 is estimated to reach as high as USD 100 trillion, underscoring the need to address this concern from an economic perspective [1]. In addition, a decreasing trend has been observed in the development of new antibiotic agents [2]. Thus, there is a need to curb the development of drug resistance in bacteria and preserve the availability of effective antibiotics for future generations.
AMR control is also an issue of concern in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Excessive or careless use of antibiotics drugs, particularly third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems, can lead to the persistence and spread of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative rod bacilli in addition to invasive Candida infections [3]. The use of these drugs is known to lead to Candida colonization in the gastrointestinal tract of neonates, especially extremely preterm neonates. Candida colonization can be a risk factor for invasive candidiasis. AMR can be mitigated by avoiding the use of third-generation cephalosporins, which, in turn, can reduce substrate-specific extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Gram-negative bacterial infections [4,5]. Bacteremia caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative rods accounts for 18.6% of the Gram-negative rod bacteremia in NICUs, which is particularly prevalent in neonates who have undergone treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotic agents and have underlying renal disease, highlighting the urgent need for remedial measures [6].
Prolonged early antibiotic use in markedly low-birth-weight infants increases the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis and death [7]. The development and increased use of broad-spectrum antibiotics has been reported to increase the emergence of AMR, with a 200–800% increase in mortality from AMR-associated bacteremia [6]. Moreover, antibiotic use during the neonatal period can potentially increase the risk of allergy, asthma, and obesity in the future [8], and the use of antibiotics in patients aged < 2 years is a risk for allergic disease by age 5 [9]. Antibiotic use in childhood may also increase the risk of developing Crohn’s disease and juvenile idiopathic arthritis [10,11]. Thus, appropriate use of antibiotic drugs has the potential to not only improve outcomes during NICU admission but also mitigate various long-term disease risks.
However, there can be difficulty in recognizing early symptoms in neonates, who often receive antibiotic therapy even though they do not have an infectious disease, because symptoms of neonatal infection are nonspecific. This is due to the consequential serious sequelae and substantial mortality rate associated with neonatal bacterial infections, underscoring the importance of timely diagnosis and treatment [12,13,14,15].
Currently, various biomarkers have been investigated for the timely diagnosis of early-onset neonatal bacterial infections [16,17,18,19]. In this study, we focused on procalcitonin (PCT), which is a precursor of calcitonin. It is produced and secreted by the thyroid C cells in the normal physiological state. However, proinflammatory cytokines triggered by bacterial organisms and toxins stimulate the liver to generate PCT. Notably, PCT levels are not elevated in response to viral infections due to the inhibitory effect of the interferon-gamma, which is produced during viral infections [20]. During the early postnatal period, PCT levels exhibit physiological fluctuation, with distinct patterns observed in preterm and term infants. Moreover, increased PCT levels are observed not only during infection but also during hypoxemia, the onset of respiratory disorders, asphyxia, intracranial hemorrhage, and circulatory abnormalities [21,22,23,24,25,26]. To address these physiological variations, a reference curve for PCT values during the early postnatal period has been proposed [21,22,23,24].
Previous studies on the association between PCT and neonatal sepsis have reported a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 50% at a PCT cutoff value of 0.5 ng/mL; sensitivity of 58% and specificity of 83% at a cutoff value of 1 ng/mL; sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 61% at a cutoff value of 2 ng/mL; and a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 67% at a cutoff value of 5.75 ng/mL [27,28,29,30]. Collectively, these findings indicate that relying solely on sensitivity and specificity is insufficient for diagnosing neonatal sepsis.
Therefore, we proposed a novel diagnostic criterion involving the 95th percentile value derived from the PCT value reference curve. Our findings demonstrated the application of this criterion for diagnosing neonatal early-onset bacterial infection in both preterm and term infants [31]. Specifically, the 95th percentile value of the PCT value reference curve is used alone in preterm infants, while it is used in combination with C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC) count, and immunoglobulin M (IgM) values in term infants. This new diagnostic criterion exhibited excellent diagnostic accuracy for early-onset bacterial infection in neonates, with sensitivity, specificity, and a Youden index of 1.00 [27,32]. Therefore, our hypothesis was that the introduction of PCT-based criteria can reduce the unnecessary use of antibiotics in NICUs. In this study, we aimed to determine whether the newly introduced diagnostic criteria would effectively reduce the frequency of antibiotic use among infants in the NICU.

2. Results

2.1. Study Population and Baseline Characteristics

During the study period, 1646 neonates were hospitalized; 217 were excluded as they had not been examined within 72 h of birth, and 6 died before 6 days of age. Overall, 737 neonates were included in a pre-intervention group (Pre-Group) and 686 in a post-intervention group (Post-Group) (Figure 1). There were no significant differences in maternal background factors between the two groups, such as gestational diabetes (GDM), hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP), Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) colonization, clinical chorioamnionitis, or intrapartum antibiotic therapy. The Pre-Group exhibited a significantly higher proportion of premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) than the Post-Group. There were no significant differences in neonatal background between the two groups, such as gestational age at birth, birth weight, Apgar score, respiratory disorder, severe neonatal asphyxia, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) requiring treatment, early-onset bacterial infection, death, death due to infection, and use of catecholamines, steroids, and gamma globulin. In the Pre-Group, neonatal transport and surgical conditions were significantly more common than those in the Post-Group. Age at examination was significantly younger and the CRP levels were significantly higher in the Pre-Group than the Post-Group. Meanwhile, the WBC and IgM did not differ significantly between the two groups (Table 1).
Table 2 and Table 3 show the details of early-onset bacterial infection in the Pre- and Post-Groups, respectively. In the Pre-Group, GBS was the most common pathogen (seven patients), and culture-proven sepsis was diagnosed in three patients. In the Post-Group, GBS and Escherichia coli were detected in four patients and three patients, respectively, and culture-proven sepsis was diagnosed in one patient. In the Pre-Group, most of the cases of early-onset bacterial infection were vaginal deliveries, and the majority were term infants. In the Post-Group, many of the patients were born by cesarean section due to the preterm deliveries.

2.2. Antibiotic Therapy

The number of patients who received antibiotics decreased significantly from 280 (38%) in the Pre-Group to 79 (12%) in the Post-Group (p < 0.01, Figure 2). Days of antibiotics therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days significantly decreased from 211.3 in the Pre-Group to 82.0 in the Post-Group (p < 0.01). Moreover, the total, ampicillin, and amikacin DOT significantly decreased in the Post-Group. Cephalosporin, penicillin, meropenem, tazobactam/piperacillin, and vancomycin DOT did not differ significantly between the two groups (Table 4).
Neonates who received antibiotics were 280 in the Pre-Group and 79 in the Post-Group. We set the cutoff value at 3 days because the culture results are confirmed in approximately 3 days in our hospital. Regarding the duration of antibiotic use, the Post-Group had significantly fewer patients with 1–3 days and more patients with 4–7 days than the Pre-Group (p < 0.01, Table 5).

2.3. Propensity Score Analysis, Multiple Regression Analysis, and Logistic Regression Analysis

Figure 3 shows the histograms of the Pre-Group and Post-Group obtained from propensity scores (PS). Table 6 shows the results of multiple regression analysis with intervention and PS as explanatory variables and DOT as outcome. Significant differences were found between the Pre-Group and Post-Group, even when adjusted for PS. The variance inflation factor for the explanatory variables, intervention, and PS was 1.06, indicating no multicollinearity. Table 7 shows the results of logistic regression analysis with intervention, PS, and the use of antibiotic as explanatory variables. The results also showed a significant difference between the Pre-Group and Post-Group, even after adjusting for PS.

3. Discussion

With the increasing prevalence of AMR and the current lack of progress in the development of new antibiotics, preventing unnecessary use of antibiotics is crucial in reducing AMR and improve the survival prognosis of neonates. Thus, the findings of the present study highlight that the new PCT diagnostic criteria can facilitate appropriate use of antibiotic therapies.
Although maternal characteristics showed a significantly higher rate of PROM in the Pre-Group, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the intrapartum antibiotic therapy or in the occurrence of early-onset bacterial infections. Therefore, administration of antibiotics to neonates for PROM is considered not essential. In the Pre-Group, the proportion of neonatal transports was significantly higher than the Post-Group. In the Pre-Group, the percentage of antibiotic use among transported infants was 44%, which influenced the use of antibiotics. Conversely, in the Post-Group, antibiotics were used in 14% of the cases. Among the cases of suspected neonatal infections in which the neonate was transported, antibiotic use was 95% in the Pre-Group and 12.5% in the Post-Group, leading to a significant decrease in antibiotic use. Although CRP levels were significantly greater in the Pre-Group than the Post-Group, the reason for high CRP level is considered to be physiological elevation [22] because no significant difference was observed in the diagnosis of early-onset bacterial infections between the two groups.
GBS was the most common pathogen detected among those diagnosed with early-onset bacterial infection in both groups, which is similar to the previous reports of early-onset sepsis [33]. GBS was common in term infants, and Escherichia coli was common in preterm infants, which was consistent with previous reports [34,35].
Our new PCT diagnostic criteria for early-onset bacterial infections significantly reduced the number of patients that used antibiotics, and no patients died of infection, suggesting that antibiotic use could be safely reduced. The findings revealed that antibiotic use was unnecessary in the Pre-Group. In the Post-Group, antibiotics were prescribed to 65 patients despite the patients not contracting bacterial infections. These included 21 patients with respiratory disorder, 15 patients with extremely preterm birth, 8 patients with surgical conditions, and 7 patients exhibiting severe asphyxia. The use of antibiotic drugs was necessary in infants with surgical conditions as the postoperative administration cannot be avoided. A future issue to address will be reducing the unnecessary use of antibiotics in extremely preterm infants and those with respiratory disorders.
DOT decreased significantly in the Post-Group. Specifically, there was a significant decline in the use of ampicillin and amikacin, which are often administered as initial antibiotic treatments in Japan. This decrease was attributed to a reduction in unnecessary prophylactic antibiotic administration. There were no significant differences in the use of cephalosporin, penicillin, meropenem, and tazobactam/piperacillin between the Pre- and Post-Groups. In the Post-Group, cephalosporin was prescribed to eleven patients, with four cases involving bacterial infection and five cases involving surgical conditions. Reducing such use was considered difficult due to the essential nature of the use. Third-generation cephalosporin was not used in the Post-Group except in cases of bacterial infection, a favorable result from the perspective of AMR suppression. Penicillin was administered in cases of congenital syphilis, which was deemed necessary. The broad-spectrum antibiotic meropenem and tazobactam/piperacillin were prescribed in cases of septic shock, and their use was considered unavoidable. There was no occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections during the study period, and vancomycin was not prescribed.
In relation to patients who received antibiotic therapy, the duration of antibiotic use was comparatively shorter in the Pre-Group and longer in the Post-Group. In the Pre-Group, several patients received prophylactic antibiotic treatment due to elevated CRP levels, preterm births, and respiratory disorders. Many of these patients completed the course of antibiotic therapy within 3 days after confirming the negative culture results upon admission. Consequently, a number of unnecessary prophylactic antibiotic administrations occurred in the Pre-Group, resulting in a substantial number of patients with a short antibiotic usage period. Regression analysis adjusted for bias of background factors in Table 2 using PS also showed significant differences in DOT and antibiotic use. Therefore, the diagnostic criteria were considered useful.
In the present study, the percentage of antibiotic use decreased significantly in the Post-Group because of unnecessary antibiotic administration in the Pre-Group. Notably, the antibiotic use in the Pre-Group did not surpass the reported usage in previous studies [36,37,38,39,40]. Therefore, the frequency and amount of antibiotic use in our NICU was not considered to be particularly high, even in the Pre-Group.
The administration of antibiotics to neonates disrupts the intestinal microbiota [41], which is potentially associated with the development of allergic diseases, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and autism spectrum disorders in the future [9,10,11,42]. Disrupting the development of the microbiome contributes to the increased prevalence of AMR. The reduction in antibiotic use not only reduces long-term disease risk but also deters the emergence of AMR.
Various efforts are underway to reduce inappropriate use of antibiotics in the NICU. The review paper has categorized methods of reducing antibiotic use as those focusing on (1) initiating antibiotic therapy, (2) reducing the duration of antibiotic treatment, and (3) introducing programs to support appropriate antibiotic use [43]. The present study found that the implementation of focusing on initiating antibiotic therapy reduced the use of antibiotics. In the future, further reduction in antibiotic use may be expected by shortening the duration of antibiotic treatment and introducing programs to support appropriate antibiotic use. The Post-Group in this present study showed a reduction in pharmacoeconomic costs for the use of antibiotics compared to the Pre-Group.
This study is subject to several limitations. First, because this was a single-center study, there were no mortalities attributable to infection in either the Pre- or Post-Group, making it difficult to determine the occurrence of treatment failure. Secondly, the criteria for termination of antibiotic therapy were determined by the attending physician. Clearly defined criteria for termination of antibiotic therapy could further reduce DOT and decrease the number of neonates who undergo unnecessary antibiotic treatment.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Design and Patients

Neonates admitted to the NICU of the Nihon University Itabashi Hospital between 6 March 2018 and 5 March 2022 were included. Some neonates were born in other hospitals and transported to our NICU when neonates showed unusual symptoms or signs after birth that may have required medical treatment. The neonates were divided into two groups: the Pre-Group admitted between 6 March 2018 and 5 March 2020 and the Post-Group admitted between 6 March 2020 and 5 March 2022. Patients in both groups who did not undergo blood tests within 72 h of birth or who died before day 6 were excluded. Blood tests were performed in all patients to evaluate CRP, WBC count, and IgM levels. Meanwhile, the PCT levels were additionally evaluated in the post-intervention group. Furthermore, all patients underwent blood, nasal, stool, urine, intragastric amniotic fluid, and spinal fluid cultures, as needed. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nihon University Itabashi Hospital (RK-190910-8 and RK-230314-10). This study was also registered with the Clinical Trials Registry in Japan (UMIN: R000059333). Patient consent was waived because this study contains no identifiable private information. We also posted an opt-out notification on the hospital homepage “http://www.med.nihon-u.ac.jp/hospital/itabashi/cr/index.html (accessed on 1 September 2023)”.

4.2. Decision to Administer Antibiotics

The decision to administer an antibiotic in the Post-Group was made using the PCT value reference curve for preterm infants and a combination of the PCT value reference curve and CRP, WBC count, and IgM values for term infants. Specifically, in preterm infants, an antibiotic was administered if the PCT value exceeded the 95th percentile of the PCT value reference curve. In term infants, an antibiotic was administered if the PCT value exceeded the 95th percentile of the PCT value reference curve in addition to a WBC count ≥25,000/µL or <5000/µL or IgM ≥ 20 mg/dL and a CRP value ≥ 1.0 mg/dL (Figure 4) [31]. The PCT value reference curve was the curve with the highest diagnostic accuracy in previous reports (Figure 5) [21]. In the Pre-Group, this was performed at the discretion of the attending neonatologists.

4.3. Diagnosis of Bacterial Infection

A diagnosis of neonatal bacterial infection was reached when pathogens were detected in culture tests within 6 days after birth. Culture-proven sepsis was diagnosed when pathogens were detected in blood cultures. A diagnosis of clinical sepsis was made when pathogens were detected in nasopharyngeal swab, stool, urine, intragastric amniotic fluid, or spinal fluid cultures in addition to three or more of the following findings: respiratory, circulatory, and neurologic symptoms; abnormal body temperature and skin color; or delayed capillary filling time [44,45,46].

4.4. Methods of Measuring Each Biomarker and Culture

Serum PCT, CRP, and IgM levels were measured using Lumipulse Presto Brahms PCT kits (FUJIREBIO Inc., Tokyo, Japan), an LZ Test EIKEN CRP-HG (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and an N-assay TIA IgM-SH Nittobo (Nittobo Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), respectively, as recommended by the manufacturers. WBC was measured using an automated hematology analyzer (XN-9100; Sysmex Co., Ltd., Kobe, Japan).
For cultures, blood, nasopharyngeal swab, and stool samples were collected using BD BACTEC™ Peds Plus™ Media (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), Transystem™ 116C (COPAN Diagnostics Inc., Murrieta, CA, USA), and Transystem™ 108C (COPAN Diagnostics Inc., Murrieta, CA, USA), respectively. Urine, gastric aspirate, and cerebrospinal fluid samples were collected in sterile spitz (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Cultures were performed using blood and chocolate agar to identify the organisms. Positive blood culture results were detected using the BD BACTEC™ FX System (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), as recommended by the manufacturer.

4.5. Study Methods

4.5.1. Clinical Characteristics of Each Group and Causative Organisms of Early-Onset Neonatal Bacterial Infections

Maternal background factors in the Pre- and Post-Groups included pregnancy complications (GDM [47,48,49] and HDP [49,50]), vaginal culture positive for GBS, clinical chorioamnionitis [51,52], PROM [53]), delivery mode, and precipitate delivery, and the number of patients who received intrapartum antibiotic drug therapy were compared. Additionally, a comparison of the neonatal background factors including gestation age at birth; birth weight; Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min; transport from another hospital; respiratory disorder; severe neonatal asphyxia [54,55,56]; surgical condition; PDA requiring treatment [57]; early-onset bacterial infection; death due to infection; use of catecholamines, steroids, and gamma globulin; age at time of the examination; CRP levels; WBC counts; IgM levels; DOT per 1000 patient days; and number of patients receiving an antibiotic were performed.
GDM is defined by glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy. The diagnosis of GDM is established through an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), which meets one or more of the following criteria: fasting blood glucose ≥ 92 mg/dL, 1 h value ≥ 180 mg/dL, or 2 h value ≥ 153 mg/dL in the 75 g OGTT [47,48,49]. HDP is defined by blood pressure readings equal to or exceeding 140/90 mmHg during pregnancy [49,50]. Clinical chorioamnionitis was diagnosed when (1) the mother had a fever of 38.0 °C or higher, and one or more of the following four conditions were present: maternal tachycardia (≥100/min), uterine tenderness, malodorous vaginal discharge/amniotic fluid, or maternal WBC count ≥15,000/µL; and (2) when all four conditions were present and other diseases were ruled out, even if the maternal body temperature was lower than 38.0 °C [51,52]. PROM was defined as water breaking before the start of labor [53]. Respiratory disorder was defined as cases with apneic attacks, cases requiring oxygenation, high-flow nasal cannula, continuous positive airway pressure, and artificial mechanical ventilation. Severe neonatal asphyxia was defined as a 1 min Apgar score of 3 or less [54,55,56]. Surgical condition was defined as cases that underwent any surgeries by 6 days of age. PDA requiring treatment was defined as cases requiring surgical ligation or drug therapy, such as use of indomethacin [57]. Early-onset bacterial infection was diagnosed as described (Section 4.3). In the Post-Group, PCT values were measured in all neonates admitted in our NICU. In cases diagnosed with early-onset bacterial infection, the pathogens detected, specimens with positive cultures, and diagnoses were extracted.

4.5.2. Calculation of the DOT

The DOT in one patient was calculated as (total number of antibiotics administered) × 1/(number of antibiotics administered per day), up to 6 days after birth. The DOT per 1000 patient days was calculated by the total DOT of all patients × 1/(number patients × 7 days) × 1000 [58]. The DOT per 1000 patient days was compared between the Pre- and Post-Groups. In cases where more than one type of antibiotic was administered, the DOT was calculated based on the antibiotic with the longest duration of use. Moreover, the DOT for each antibiotic prescribed was compared. The number of patients who used an antibiotic for over 4 days within one week after birth was compared between the Pre- and Post-Groups.

4.5.3. Adjustment for Background Factors

PS was calculated to adjust for bias in the Pre-Group’s and the Post-Group’s background factors. The Pre-Group’s and Post-Group’s frequencies obtained from the PS were compared by creating a histogram. DOT was examined by multiple regression analysis with PS as a covariate. Similarly, we examined the presence or absence of antibiotic use by logistic regression analysis with PS as a covariate.

4.5.4. Statistical Analyses

Fischer’s exact test, Pearson’s x2 test, or the Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the datasets of the two groups, as appropriate [59]. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP version 14 (SAS Institute Inc., Tokyo, Japan). A two-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

In NICUs, an introduction of a new method using the 95th percentile cutoff value of the PCT value reference curve can reduce the frequency of prescription and duration of antibiotic use without increasing the incidence of early-onset bacterial infection cases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.N. and I.M.; methodology, N.N. and I.M.; validation, H.G., N.N. and I.M.; formal analysis, H.G., N.N. and I.M.; investigation, H.G., N.N., Y.S., D.K., K.H., T.A., T.I., R.A., M.H., A.S. and A.O.; resources, N.N. and I.M.; data curation, I.M.; writing—original draft preparation, H.G., N.N. and I.M.; writing—review and editing, Y.S., D.K., K.H., T.A., T.I., R.A., M.H., A.S., A.O. and I.M.; visualization, H.G. and N.N.; funding acquisition, I.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partially supported by Nihon University Research Grant for 2022 and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (grant numbers: JP 23fk0108682).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nihon University Itabashi Hospital (RK-190910-8 and RK-230314-10).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived because of no identifiable private information. We also posted an opt-out notification on the hospital homepage “http://www.med.nihon-u.ac.jp/hospital/itabashi/cr/index.html (accessed on 1 September 2023)”.

Data Availability Statement

The data of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Tetsuya Taniguchi (Department of Liberal Arts, Nihon University School of Medicine) for his support in the statistical analyses and the medical staff at the NICU in Nihon University Itabashi Hospital for their clinical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tackling Drug-Resistant Infections Globally final report and recommendations. Available online: https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160518_Final%20paper_with%20cover.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2023).
  2. Silver, L. Recent advances and challenges in antibacterial drug development: Editorial. Admet Dmpk 2022, 10, 89–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cotten, C.M.; McDonald, S.; Stoll, B.; Goldberg, R.N.; Poole, K.; Benjamin, D.K., Jr. The Association of Third-Generation Cephalosporin Use and Invasive Candidiasis in Extremely Low Birth-Weight Infants. Pediatrics 2006, 118, 717–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Murki, S.; Jonnala, S.; Mohammed, F.; Reddy, A. Restriction of cephalosporins and control of extended spectrum β-lactamase producing gram negative bacteria in a neonatal intensive care unit. Indian Pediatr. 2010, 47, 785–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Calil, R.; Marba, S.T.M.; von Nowakonski, A.; Tresoldi, A.T. Reduction in colonization and nosocomial infection by multiresistant bacteria in a neonatal unit after institution of educational measures and restriction in the use of cephalosporins. Am. J. Infect. Control 2001, 29, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tsai, M.-H.; Chu, S.-M.; Hsu, J.-F.; Lien, R.; Huang, H.-R.; Chiang, M.-C.; Fu, R.-H.; Lee, C.-W.; Huang, Y.-C. Risk Factors and Outcomes for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteremia in the NICU. Pediatrics 2014, 133, e322–e329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cotten, C.M.; Taylor, S.; Stoll, B.; Goldberg, R.N.; Hansen, N.I.; Sánchez, P.J.; Ambalavanan, N.; Benjamin, D.K., Jr. Prolonged Duration of Initial Empirical Antibiotic Treatment Is Associated With Increased Rates of Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Death for Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants. Pediatrics 2009, 123, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Willis, Z.; Maurice, A.d.S. Strategies to improve antibiotic use in the neonatal ICU. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2019, 31, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yamamoto-Hanada, K.; Yang, L.; Narita, M.; Saito, H.; Ohya, Y. Influence of antibiotic use in early childhood on asthma and allergic diseases at age 5. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017, 119, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Canova, C.; Ludvigsson, J.F.; Di Domenicantonio, R.; Zanier, L.; Amidei, C.B.; Zingone, F. Perinatal and Antibiotic Exposures and the Risk of Developing Childhood-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Nested Case-Control Study Based on a Population-Based Birth Cohort. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Horton, D.B.; Scott, F.I.; Haynes, K.; Putt, M.E.; Rose, C.D.; Lewis, J.D.; Strom, B.L. Antibiotic Exposure and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Case–Control Study. Pediatrics 2015, 136, e333–e343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chiesa, C.; Pacifico, L.; Osborn, J.F.; Bonci, E.; Hofer, N.; Resch, B. Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis: Still Room for Improvement in Procalcitonin Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Medicine 2015, 94, e1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Morioka, I.; Morikawa, S.; Miwa, A.; Minami, H.; Yoshii, K.; Kugo, M.; Kitsunezuka, Y.; Enomoto, M.; Jikimoto, T.; Nakamura, M.; et al. Culture-Proven Neonatal Sepsis in Japanese Neonatal Care Units in 2006–2008. Neonatology 2012, 102, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Schrag, S.J.; Farley, M.M.; Petit, S.; Reingold, A.; Weston, E.J.; Pondo, T.; Jain, J.H.; Lynfield, R. Epidemiology of Invasive Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis, 2005 to 2014. Pediatrics 2016, 138, e20162013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wynn, J.L.; Wong, H.R. Pathophysiology and Treatment of Septic Shock in Neonates. Clin. Perinatol. 2010, 37, 439–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Puello-Ávila, A.C.; Cataño-Villegas, A.E. Utility of C-reactive protein in early neonatal sepsis. Rev. Chil. Infectol. 2021, 38, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vasilcan, G.; Avasiloaiei, A.; Moscalu, M.; Dimitriu, A.G.; Stamatin, M. Procalcitonine--early marker of neonatal infection. Rev. Med. Chir. Soc. Med. Nat. Iasi 2012, 115, 1243–1250. [Google Scholar]
  18. Krishna, B.V.; Nadgir, S.D.; Tallur, S.S. Immunoglobulin-M estimation and C-reactive protein detection in neonatal septicemia. Indian J. Pathol. Microbiol. 2000, 43, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  19. Rodwell, R.L.; Leslie, A.L.; Tudehope, D.I. Early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis using a hematologic scoring system. J. Pediatr. 1988, 112, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rhee, C. Using Procalcitonin to Guide Antibiotic Therapy. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2017, 4, ofw249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fukuzumi, N.; Osawa, K.; Sato, I.; Iwatani, S.; Ishino, R.; Hayashi, N.; Iijima, K.; Saegusa, J.; Morioka, I. Age-specific percentile-based reference curve of serum procalcitonin concentrations in Japanese preterm infants. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chiesa, C.; Natale, F.; Pascone, R.; Osborn, J.F.; Pacifico, L.; Bonci, E.; De Curtis, M. C reactive protein and procalcitonin: Reference intervals for preterm and term newborns during the early neonatal period. Clin. Chim. Acta 2011, 412, 1053–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Turner, D.; Hammerman, C.; Rudensky, B.; Schlesinger, Y.; Goia, C.; Schimmel, M.S. Procalcitonin in preterm infants during the first few days of life: Introducing an age related nomogram. Arch. Dis. Child.-Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006, 91, F283–F286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chiesa, C.; Panero, A.; Rossi, N.; Stegagno, M.; De Giusti, M.; Osborn, J.F.; Pacifico, L. Reliability of Procalcitonin Concentrations for the Diagnosis of Sepsis in Critically III Neonates. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1998, 26, 664–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ochi, F.; Higaki, T.; Ohta, M.; Yamauchi, T.; Tezuka, M.; Chisaka, T.; Moritani, T.; Tauchi, H.; Ishii, E. Procalcitonin as a marker of respiratory disorder in neonates. Pediatr. Int. 2015, 57, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Stocker, M.; Hop, W.C.; MC van Rossum, A. Neonatal Procalcitonin Intervention Study (NeoPInS): Effect of Procalcitonin-guided decision making on Duration of antibiotic Therapy in suspected neonatal early-onset Sepsis: A multi-centre randomized superiority and non-inferiority Intervention Study. BMC Pediatr. 2010, 10, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. E Ballot, D.; Perovic, O.; Galpin, J.; A Cooper, P. Serum procalcitonin as an early marker of neonatal sepsis. S. Afr. Med. J. 2004, 94, 851–854. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bender, L.; Thaarup, J.; Varming, K.; Krarup, H.; Ellermann-Eriksen, S.; Ebbesen, F. Early and late markers for the detection of early-onset neonatal sepsis. Dan. Med. Bull. 2008, 55, 219–223. [Google Scholar]
  29. Resch, B.; Gusenleitner, W.; Müller, W. Procalcitonin and interleukin-6 in the diagnosis of early-onset sepsis of the neonate. Acta Paediatr. 2003, 92, 243–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Santuz, P.; Soffiati, M.; Dorizzi, R.M.; Benedetti, M.; Zaglia, F.; Biban, P. Procalcitonin for the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis: A multilevel probabilistic approach. Clin. Biochem. 2008, 41, 1150–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Go, H.; Nagano, N.; Katayama, D.; Akimoto, T.; Imaizumi, T.; Aoki, R.; Hijikata, M.; Seimiya, A.; Kato, R.; Okahashi, A.; et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Early-onset Neonatal Bacterial Infections: Evaluation of Serum Procalcitonin Reference Curves. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fluss, R.; Faraggi, D.; Reiser, B. Estimation of the Youden Index and its Associated Cutoff Point. Biom. J. 2005, 47, 458–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vergnano, S.; Menson, E.; Kennea, N.; Embleton, N.; Russell, A.B.; Watts, T.; Robinson, M.J.; Collinson, A.; Heath, P.T. Neonatal infections in England: The NeonIN surveillance network. Arch. Dis. Child.-Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010, 96, F9–F14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Stoll, B.J.; Puopolo, K.M.; Hansen, N.I.; Sánchez, P.J.; Bell, E.F.; Carlo, W.A.; Cotten, C.M.; D’angio, C.T.; Kazzi, S.N.J.; Poindexter, B.B.; et al. Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis 2015 to 2017, the Rise of Escherichia coli, and the Need for Novel Prevention Strategies. JAMA Pediatr. 2020, 174, e200593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Korang, S.K.; Safi, S.; Nava, C.; Gordon, A.; Gupta, M.; Greisen, G.; Lausten-Thomsen, U.; Jakobsen, J.C. Antibiotic regimens for early-onset neonatal sepsis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 2021, CD013837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bhat, R.; Custodio, H.; McCurley, C.; Whitehurst, R.; Gulati, R.; Jha, O.P.; Bhat, J.; Estrada, B.; Hill, A.; Eyal, F.; et al. Reducing antibiotic utilization rate in preterm infants: A quality improvement initiative. J. Perinatol. 2018, 38, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cantey, J.B.; Wozniak, P.S.; E Pruszynski, J.; Sánchez, P.J. Reducing unnecessary antibiotic use in the neonatal intensive care unit (SCOUT): A prospective interrupted time-series study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 1178–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kitano, T.; Takagi, K.; Arai, I.; Yasuhara, H.; Ebisu, R.; Ohgitani, A.; Kitagawa, D.; Oka, M.; Masuo, K.; Minowa, H. A simple and feasible antimicrobial stewardship program in a neonatal intensive care unit of a Japanese community hospital. J. Infect. Chemother. 2019, 25, 860–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. McCarthy, K.; Hawke, A.; Dempsey, E. Antimicrobial stewardship in the neonatal unit reduces antibiotic exposure. Acta Paediatr. 2018, 107, 1716–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Desai, S.; Qin, H.; Rayburn, P.D.; Poon, G.; Murthy, K.; Ellsbury, D.L.; Chiruvolu, A.; Tolia, V.N. Implementation of an Automatic Stop Order and Initial Antibiotic Exposure in Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Am. J. Perinatol. 2017, 34, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gasparrini, A.J.; Crofts, T.S.; Gibson, M.K.; Tarr, P.I.; Warner, B.B.; Dantas, G. Antibiotic perturbation of the preterm infant gut microbiome and resistome. Gut Microbes 2016, 7, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, Q.; Zhou, J.-M. The microbiota–gut–brain axis and its potential therapeutic role in autism spectrum disorder. Neuroscience 2016, 324, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rajar, P.; Saugstad, O.D.; Berild, D.; Dutta, A.; Greisen, G.; Lausten-Thomsen, U.; Mande, S.S.; Nangia, S.; Petersen, F.C.; Dahle, U.R.; et al. Antibiotic Stewardship in Premature Infants: A Systematic Review. Neonatology 2020, 117, 673–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hofer, N.; Zacharias, E.; Müller, W.; Resch, B. Performance of the definitions of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis in neonates. Jpme 2012, 40, 587–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Müller, W.; Resch, B.; Hofer, N. Definitions of SIRS and sepsis in correlation with early and late onset neonatal sepsis. J. Pediatr. Intensiv. Care 2012, 01, 017–023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Krueger, M.; Nauck, M.S.; Sang, S.; Hentschel, R.; Wieland, H.; Berner, R. Cord Blood Levels of Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-8 for the Immediate Diagnosis of Early-Onset Infection in Premature Infants. Neonatology 2001, 80, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nishikawa, T.; Ono, K.; Hashimoto, S.; Kinoshita, H.; Watanabe, T.; Araki, H.; Otsu, K.; Sakamoto, W.; Harada, M.; Toyonaga, T.; et al. One-hour oral glucose tolerance test plasma glucose at gestational diabetes diagnosis is a common predictor of the need for insulin therapy in pregnancy and postpartum impaired glucose tolerance. J. Diabetes Investig. 2018, 9, 1370–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Metzger, B.E.; Gabbe, S.G.; Persson, B.; Lowe, L.P.; Dyer, A.R.; Oats, J.J.; Buchanan, T.A. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy: Response to Weinert. Diabetes Care 2010, 33, e98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Aoki, M.; Urakami, T.; Nagano, N.; Aoki, R.; Morioka, I. Association of Plasma Cortisol Levels with Gestational Age and Anthropometric Values at Birth in Preterm Infants. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Watanabe, K.; Matsubara, K.; Nakamoto, O.; Ushijima, J.; Ohkuchi, A.; Koide, K.; Makino, S.; Mimura, K.; Morikawa, M.; Naruse, K.; et al. Outline of the new definition and classification of “Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy (HDP)”; a revised JSSHP statement of 2005. Hypertens. Res. Pregnancy 2018, 6, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aljerian, K. Chorioamnionitis: Establishing a correlation between clinical and histological diagnosis. Indian J. Pathol. Microbiol. 2020, 63, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lencki, S.G.; Maciulla, M.B.; Eglinton, G.S. Maternal and umbilical cord serum interleukin levels in preterm labor with clinical chorioamnionitis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1994, 170, 1345–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dayal, S.; Hong, P.L. Premature Rupture of Membranes; StatPearls LLC: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kumari, S.; Sharma, M.; Yadav, M.; Saraf, A.; Kabra, M.; Mehra, R. Trends in neonatal outcome with low apgar scores. Indian J. Pediatr. 1993, 60, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Giacoia, G.P. Low Apgar scores and birth asphyxia: Misconceptions that promote undeserved negligence suits. Postgrad. Med. 1988, 84, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Razaz, N.; Norman, M.; Alfvén, T.; Cnattingius, S. Low Apgar score and asphyxia complications at birth and risk of longer-term cardiovascular disease: A nationwide population-based study of term infants. Lancet Reg. Health-Eur. 2023, 24, 100532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Abu-Shaweesh, J.M.; Almidani, E. PDA: Does it matter? Int. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2020, 7, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Morris, A.M.; Brener, S.; Dresser, L.; Daneman, N.; Dellit, T.H.; Avdic, E.; Bell, C.M. Use of a Structured Panel Process to Define Quality Metrics for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiology 2012, 33, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lee, S.W. Methods for testing statistical differences between groups in medical research: Statistical standard and guideline of Life Cycle Committee. Life Cycle 2022, 2, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart of the participants. NICU, neonatal intensive care unit.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the participants. NICU, neonatal intensive care unit.
Antibiotics 12 01426 g001
Figure 2. Change in the proportion of patients who received antibiotic therapy between the Pre- and Post-Groups.
Figure 2. Change in the proportion of patients who received antibiotic therapy between the Pre- and Post-Groups.
Antibiotics 12 01426 g002
Figure 3. The histograms of Pre-Group and Post-Group. Based on the frequency of trends obtained from the PS, the histograms of Pre-Group and Post-Group are shown in the upper and lower rows, respectively. PS, propensity score.
Figure 3. The histograms of Pre-Group and Post-Group. Based on the frequency of trends obtained from the PS, the histograms of Pre-Group and Post-Group are shown in the upper and lower rows, respectively. PS, propensity score.
Antibiotics 12 01426 g003
Figure 4. Protocol for use of antibiotics in preterm and term infants. CRP, C-reactive protein; IgM, immunoglobulin M; PCT, procalcitonin; WBC, white blood cell.
Figure 4. Protocol for use of antibiotics in preterm and term infants. CRP, C-reactive protein; IgM, immunoglobulin M; PCT, procalcitonin; WBC, white blood cell.
Antibiotics 12 01426 g004
Figure 5. Serum PCT reference curves for preterm and term infants. These figures are cited from reference [21]. Solid and dotted lines indicate the 50th and 95th percentile lines, respectively. PCT, procalcitonin.
Figure 5. Serum PCT reference curves for preterm and term infants. These figures are cited from reference [21]. Solid and dotted lines indicate the 50th and 95th percentile lines, respectively. PCT, procalcitonin.
Antibiotics 12 01426 g005
Table 1. Distribution of maternal and neonatal clinical backgrounds.
Table 1. Distribution of maternal and neonatal clinical backgrounds.
Pre-Group
n = 737
Post-Group
n = 686
p-Value
A. Maternal backgrounds
Gestational diabetes73 (10)83 (12)0.19 *
Hypertensive disorder of pregnancy78 (11)78 (11)0.63 *
GBS colonization99 (13)98 (14)0.64 *
Clinical chorioamnionitis23 (3.1)12 (1.8)0.10 *
PROM152 (21)75 (11)<0.01 *
Delivery mode 0.06 *
Vaginal delivery322 (44)265 (39)
Cesarean section415 (56)421 (61)
Precipitate delivery5 (0.68)4 (0.58)1.0 **
Intrapartum antibiotic therapy483 (66)474 (69)0.15 *
B. Neonatal backgrounds
GA at birth, weeks37 (22–42)37 (22–42)0.49 ***
GA ≥ 37 weeks421 (57)366 (53)0.15 *
28 ≤ GA < 37 weeks286 (39)293 (43)
GA < 28 weeks30 (4.1)27 (4.0)
BW, g2504 (356–4315)2448 (278–4446)0.21 ***
BW ≥ 2500 g372 (50)318 (46)0.12 *
1500 ≤ BW < 2500 g279 (38)293 (43)
1000 ≤ BW < 1500 g50 (6.8)42 (6.1)
BW < 1000 36 (5.0)33 (4.8)
Apgar score
at 1 min8 (0–10)8 (0–10)0.87 ***
at 5 min9 (0–10)9 (1–10)0.07 ***
Neonatal transport229 (31)161 (23)<0.01 *
Respiratory disorder456 (62)425 (62)0.97 *
Severe neonatal asphyxia90 (12)63 (9.2)0.11 *
Surgical condition20 (2.7)7 (1.0)0.02 *
Patent ductus arteriosus that required indomethacin or surgical treatment30 (4.1)34 (5.0)0.42 *
Early-onset bacterial infection15 (2.0)14 (2.0)0.99 *
Death0 (0)0 (0)-
Death due to infection0 (0)0 (0)-
Use of catecholamine62 (8.4)75 (11)0.10 *
Use of steroid11 (1.5)11 (1.6)0.87 *
Use of gamma globulin34 (4.6)28 (4.1)0.62 *
Age at measurement of biomarkers, days0 (0–3)0 (0–3)0.01 ***
PCT, ng/mL- (-)0.17 (0.02–100)-
CRP, mg/dL0.1 (0.1–10.64)0.1 (0.1–10.7)0.01 ***
WBC, /µL13,600 (1500–53,700)13,100 (2200–62,600)0.12 ***
IgM, mg/dL8 (2–220)8 (2–253)0.99 ***
Values are presented as the median (range) or number (percentage). * Data were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test. ** Data were compared using Fischer’s exact test. *** Data were compared using Mann–Whiney U test. BW, body weight; GA, gestational age; CRP, C-reactive protein; GBS, group B Streptococcus; IgM, immunoglobulin M; PROM, premature rupture of membranes; PCT, procalcitonin; WBC, white blood cell.
Table 2. The details of early-onset bacterial infection in the Pre-Group.
Table 2. The details of early-onset bacterial infection in the Pre-Group.
No.Detected PathogensCulture-Positive SamplesDiagnosisDelivery ModeGestational Age at Birth
1Escherichia coli,
α-Streptococcus
Gastric aspirationClinical sepsisVaginal delivery40 weeks
2Streptococcus agalactiaeBlood, nasopharyngeal swab, and stoolCulture-proven sepsisVaginal delivery39 weeks
3Streptococcus agalactiaeNasopharyngeal swab and gastric aspirationClinical sepsisVaginal delivery39 weeks
4Streptococcus agalactiaeBlood, nasopharyngeal swab, and stoolCulture-proven sepsisCesarean section38 weeks
5Staphylococcus aureusNasopharyngeal swab and stoolClinical sepsisVaginal delivery37 weeks
6Streptococcus agalactiaeStoolClinical sepsisVaginal delivery39 weeks
7Enterococcus faecalisGastric aspirationClinical sepsisCesarean section41 weeks
8Streptococcus agalactiaeStoolClinical sepsisVaginal delivery40 weeks
9Streptococcus agalactiaeGastric aspirationClinical sepsisCesarean section39 weeks
10Streptococcus equisimilisBlood, nasopharyngeal swab, and stoolCulture-proven sepsisVaginal delivery40 weeks
11Staphylococcus aureusNasopharyngeal swab and stoolClinical sepsisCesarean section40 weeks
12Enterococcus faecalisNasopharyngeal swab, stool, and gastric aspirationClinical sepsisCesarean section33 weeks
13Staphylococcus aureusNasopharyngeal swab and gastric aspirationClinical sepsisCesarean section25 weeks
14Escherichia coliNasopharyngeal swab, stool, and gastric aspirationClinical sepsisVaginal delivery34 weeks
15Streptococcus agalactiaeUrineClinical sepsisVaginal delivery33 weeks
Table 3. The details of early-onset bacterial infection in the Post-Group.
Table 3. The details of early-onset bacterial infection in the Post-Group.
No.Pathogens DetectedCulture-Positive SamplesDiagnosisDelivery ModeGestational Age at Birth
1Escherichia coliBlood, nasopharyngeal swab, and gastric aspirationCulture-proven sepsisVaginal delivery38 weeks
2Streptococcus agalactiaeNasopharyngeal swab, stool, and gastric aspirationClinical sepsisCesarean section41 weeks
3Streptococcus agalactiaeNasopharyngeal swab, stool, and gastric aspirationClinical sepsisCesarean section41 weeks
4Streptococcus agalactiaeNasopharyngeal swab and stoolClinical sepsisCesarean section40 weeks
5Gardnerella vaginalisStool and gastric aspirationClinical sepsisCesarean section27 weeks
6Streptococcus pneumoniaeNasopharyngeal swab, stool, and gastric aspirationClinical sepsisCesarean section33 weeks
7Staphylococcus aureusNasopharyngeal swab, stool, and urineClinical sepsisCesarean section33 weeks
8Escherichia coliNasopharyngeal swabClinical sepsisCesarean section25 weeks
9Coryneform Gram-positive rodGastric aspirationClinical sepsisVaginal delivery35 weeks
10Escherichia coliNasopharyngeal swab and urineClinical sepsisCesarean section35 weeks
11Prevotella biviaGastric aspirationClinical sepsisCesarean section22 weeks
12Prevotella biviaGastric aspirationClinical sepsisCesarean section25 weeks
13Streptococcus agalactiaeNasopharyngeal swab and stoolClinical sepsisVaginal delivery22 weeks
14Gardnerella vaginalisNasopharyngeal swab, stool, and gastric aspirationClinical sepsisCesarean section30 weeks
Table 4. Comparison of antibiotic therapies and DOT between the Pre- and Post-Groups.
Table 4. Comparison of antibiotic therapies and DOT between the Pre- and Post-Groups.
Pre-Group
n = 737
Post-Group
n = 686
p-Value
Antibiotic therapy280 (38)79 (12)<0.01 *
DOT211.382.0<0.01 **
Ampicillin DOT203.374.5<0.01 **
Amikacin DOT133.262.8<0.01 **
Cephalosporin DOT8.88.00.88 **
Penicillin DOT01.40.30 **
Meropenem DOT00.90.30 **
Piperacillin-tazobactam DOT00.50.30 **
Vancomycin DOT00-
* Data are presented as number (percentage) and were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test. ** Data are presented as the total number of DOT and were compared using Mann–Whiney U test. DOT indicates the days of antibiotic therapy per 1000 patient days.
Table 5. The duration of antibiotic use in neonates who received antibiotics.
Table 5. The duration of antibiotic use in neonates who received antibiotics.
Pre-Group
n = 280
Post-Group
n = 79
p-Value
1–3 days84 (30)3 (3.8)<0.01
4–7 days196 (70)76 (96.2)
Data are presented as number (percentage) and were compared by using Pearson’s chi-square test.
Table 6. Multiple regression analysis.
Table 6. Multiple regression analysis.
DOTEstimateSEt-Valuep-Value95% CI
LowerUpper
Intercept3.10.2114.6<0.012.73.5
Intervention, yes−0.700.10−6.8<0.01−0.89−0.49
Intervention, no (reference)------
PS−3.50.44−8.1<0.01−4.4−2.7
CI, confidence interval; DOT, days of therapy; PS, propensity score; SE, standard error.
Table 7. Logistic regression analysis.
Table 7. Logistic regression analysis.
Antibiotic TherapyOdds Ratiop-Value95% CI
LowerUpper
Intervention, yes0.26<0.010.200.35
Intervention, no (reference)----
PS0.0081<0.010.00260.025
CI, confidence interval; PS, propensity score.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Go, H.; Nagano, N.; Sato, Y.; Katayama, D.; Hara, K.; Akimoto, T.; Imaizumi, T.; Aoki, R.; Hijikata, M.; Seimiya, A.; et al. Procalcitonin-Based Antibiotic Use for Neonatal Early-Onset Bacterial Infections: Pre- and Post-Intervention Clinical Study. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091426

AMA Style

Go H, Nagano N, Sato Y, Katayama D, Hara K, Akimoto T, Imaizumi T, Aoki R, Hijikata M, Seimiya A, et al. Procalcitonin-Based Antibiotic Use for Neonatal Early-Onset Bacterial Infections: Pre- and Post-Intervention Clinical Study. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(9):1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091426

Chicago/Turabian Style

Go, Hidetoshi, Nobuhiko Nagano, Yuki Sato, Daichi Katayama, Koichiro Hara, Takuya Akimoto, Takayuki Imaizumi, Ryoji Aoki, Midori Hijikata, Ayako Seimiya, and et al. 2023. "Procalcitonin-Based Antibiotic Use for Neonatal Early-Onset Bacterial Infections: Pre- and Post-Intervention Clinical Study" Antibiotics 12, no. 9: 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091426

APA Style

Go, H., Nagano, N., Sato, Y., Katayama, D., Hara, K., Akimoto, T., Imaizumi, T., Aoki, R., Hijikata, M., Seimiya, A., Okahashi, A., & Morioka, I. (2023). Procalcitonin-Based Antibiotic Use for Neonatal Early-Onset Bacterial Infections: Pre- and Post-Intervention Clinical Study. Antibiotics, 12(9), 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091426

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop