Next Article in Journal
Characterization of a Lytic Bacteriophage as an Antimicrobial Agent for Biocontrol of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli O145 Strains
Previous Article in Journal
Disulfiram (Tetraethylthiuram Disulfide) in the Treatment of Lyme Disease and Babesiosis: Report of Experience in Three Cases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Size and Flexibility Define the Inhibition of the H3N2 Influenza Endonuclease Enzyme by Calix[n]arenes

by
Yannick Tauran
1,2,*,
José Pedro Cerón-Carrasco
3,
Moez Rhimi
4,
Florent Perret
5,
Beomjoon Kim
2,6,
Dominique Collard
7,
Anthony W. Coleman
1 and
Horacio Pérez-Sánchez
3,*
1
Laboratoire Multimatériaux et Interfaces CNRS UMR 5615, Université Lyon 1, 69622 Villeurbanne, France
2
Laboratory for Integrated Micro-Mechatronic Systems (LIMMS)/CNRS-IIS UMI 2820, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8505, Japan
3
Bioinformatics and High Performance Computing (BIO-HPC) Research Group, Universidad Católica de Murcia (UCAM), 30107 Murcia, Spain
4
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), UMR 1319 Micalis, F-78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
5
Institut de Chimie et Biochimie Moléculaires et Supramoléculaires, CNRS UMR 5246, Université Lyon 1, 69622 Villeurbanne, France
6
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research on Micro-Nano Methods (CIRMM), Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8505, Japan
7
Université Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, Institut Supérieur de l’Electronique et du Numérique (ISEN), University Valenciennes, UMR 8520-IEMN, F59000 Lille, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2019, 8(2), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8020073
Submission received: 4 April 2019 / Revised: 29 May 2019 / Accepted: 30 May 2019 / Published: 3 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Supramolecular Anti-Infectives)

Abstract

:
Inhibition of H3N2 influenza PA endonuclease activity by a panel of anionic calix[n]arenes and β-cyclodextrin sulfate has been studied. The joint experimental and theoretical results reveal that the larger, more flexible and highly water-soluble sulfonato-calix[n]arenes have high inhibitory activity, with para-sulfonato-calix[8]arene, SC8, having an IC50 value of 6.4 μM. Molecular docking calculations show the SC8 can interact at both the polyanion binding site and also the catalytic site of H3N2 influenza PA endonuclease.

1. Introduction

Influenza A viruses are agents of infection (pathogens) that can be transmitted by skin contact or from aerosol droplets. The result is a seasonal respiratory disease, characterized by fever, respiratory problems, and headaches. Influenza may be fatal in cases of highly active strains or for weakened patients, including children, the elderly, and those suffering from pre-existing chronic diseases [1]. Although infection rates are generally around four million per year, influenza epidemics have reached a pandemic level in 1918, 1957, 1968, and 2009 [2]. The severity of epidemics in terms of virus type, subtype, and lineage have recently been reviewed [3]. The host reservoir for the Influenza A virus is found in waterfowl; however, transmission to humans is possible. Infection of swine is more common and it has been postulated that swine may be a reservoir for gene reassortment between different sub-forms of the virus [4]. As the viral genome is composed of eight negative-sense RNA segments (vRNA) switching of various segments can lead to new Influenza A strains, as exemplified by the 2009 H1N1 pandemic where segments of avian, swine, and human origin were present [5].
Current action against influenza infection involves vaccination; however, such treatment is ineffective in post-infection or against emergent viral types [6]. At the moment, the approved anti-viral agents target the M2 ion channel (responsible for vRNP) or the neuraminidase (NA) protein responsible for the release of new virons from infected cells. Resistance to the M2 targeting drugs is quite well known and NA-inhibitor resistant viruses are becoming known. More importantly, some H5N1 isolates encode resistance to both approaches [7]; indeed some strains show drug resistance without prior exposure to active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) [8]. Of the constituent parts of the viral ribonuclease protein, the polymerase PA unit containing the endonuclease fragment is of potential interest, as described by White [9] who described the structural and biochemical requirements for the development of influenza virus inhibitors. During the past years, a series of small-molecular inhibitors targeting this endonuclease have been developed based on small basic nitrogen heterocyclic structures [10,11].
A few months ago, the FDA approved Xofluza using Baloxavir Marboxil as a prodrug of baloxavir acid for inhibiting the viral PA polymerase unit [12]. In vitro assay has demonstrated a potent inhibition with an IC50 of 2.5 nM compared to the other inhibitors (Table 1). Clinical trials showed also a greater reduction in viral loads compared to the neuraminidase inhibitor molecule oseltamivir [13]. However, resistance mutation constituted a clear concern with resistant viruses detection before (baseline) and after treatment [14]. As a consequence, other classes of molecule that target the active site of the endonuclease should be further investigated.
With regard to the use of large three-dimensional molecules to target endonuclease, PA previous studies have included the use of fullerene derivatives to complex the active pocket [15]. Our previous work on Class II endonucleases showed the interest of large macrocycles to inhibit PdiL, Hind III, and two other endonucleases [16]. There exists a wide variation in the sequence of various endonuclease enzymes belonging to the three or four recognized classes of endonucleases and in particular the large class of type II enzymes. In fact, the core structural geometries and both the nucleic acid recognition site and the catalytic site have conserved sequences, the former is the RXXR sequence [17] (strongly analogous to the BBXB recognition site for glycosyl-aminoglycan binding [18]) and the latter is characterized by the PD/EXK sequence [19]. In Figure 1 below, we show the sequence of the H3N2 PA endonuclease used from White et al. [9] with potential nucleic acid binding sites highlighted in red, several sites containing multiple R/KXXR/K sequences can be observed.
The PD pair are involved in binding the catalytic metal center, generally Mg2+, but also Mn2+ and other divalent cations except for Ca2+ [20]. In that framework, previous studies of anionic calix[n]arene binding to glycosaminoglycan binding sites in Heparin Co-Factor II [21], the prion protein [22,23], and other proteins associated with neurodegenerative diseases [24] have shown that binding strength increases with macrocycle size. For para-sulfonato-calix[n]arene to protein binding only in the case of the serum albumins is the smallest anion para-sulfonato-calix[4]arene favored [25]. From these results and previously observed Class II endonuclease inhibition [15], a panel of nine sulfonated calix[n]arenes and cyclodextrins were selected, see Scheme 1. Two outriders were included cyclodextrin sulfate and calix[4]arene di-phosphorus acid, the former is an anti-viral [26] and an inhibitor of certain endonucleases [15]. The latter presents phosphate groups, possible analogs to the phosphodiester groups of DNA. A major factor in the choice of potentially active molecules lies in the low toxicity of the anionic calix[n]arenes [27].
Then, blind docking method has been carried out to predict where the calix[n]arene interacted with endonuclease PA, as we expected interaction at the DNA holding site and not the active cleavage site. As stated by Mallipeddi [28], computational screening may offer a hit rate that is 10 times higher (1–5%) than random screening. Therefore, blind docking has been found out here particularly appropriated in our methodology to suggest the DNA binding groove site as one of the possible target sites.

2. Results

SC4a is presumed to be in the cone conformation [29] as is SC4c; however, SC4b may be present in a cone or 1,3 alternate, or even a partial cone structure. C4diP will be present in the cone conformation, as generally observed for this molecule [30]. With regard to the SC6 derivatives, we believe they will be present in the pleated “taco” form as previously observed for mono-functionalized para-H-calix-[6]-arenes, to obtain maximum length [31]. The question with regard to the SC8 systems is much more complex, structures varying from a flat roseate conformation, [32] through pleated loops [33] to a helical form with phenathroline resembling a DNA helix [34] are all known. It is interesting to note that the end to end distance at 2.0–2.2 nm is almost constant for all the conformations. The conformation appears to be entirely dependent on the nature of the species binding to SC8. Here, a twisted structure has been used in the calculations.
Recombinant gene expression was used to obtain the PA protein. The expression vector was constructed by S. Gaudon in the group of Cusack, EMBL Grenoble and kindly provided to us. The work produced a shorter but similar construct than that previously published by Dias [35]. The DNA coding for PA-Nter (residues 1–198) from A/Victoria/3/1975 (H3N2) (Accession number: CY121202.1) was cloned into a pET-M11 expression vector (EMBL). This vector was used to transfect E. coli BL21 and the protein was then expressed in LB medium over-night at 15 °C after induction with 0.1 mM isopropyl-β-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Protein purification was undertaken using a metal affinity column (followed by gel filtration on a Superdex 200 column). The final concentration of protein was estimated at 0.5 mg/mL with a purity superior to 95% (Figure S1).
The digestion activity of the purified PA endonuclease was quantified using agarose gel electrophoresis. A concentration range of PA endonuclease (0.5 mg/mL to 0.5 µg/mL) was mixed with 0.5 µg of λ-DNA (Takara, Japan) in buffer at a final concentration of 20 mM Tris HCl pH 8, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM MnCl2, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol. After one hour of incubation at 37 °C, the samples were deposited on ethidium bromide treated agarose gel 0.6% and run during 90 minutes at 75 V. The gel was then scanned (Figure S2). 100 µM solutions of each macrocyclic molecules (Scheme 1) were mixed with 0.5 µg of buffered λ-DNA. This mixture was then combined with the PA endonuclease enzyme and incubated for 1 hour at 37 °C. The samples were deposited on agarose gel 0.6% previously mixed with ethidium bromide and run during 90 minutes at 75 V, after which the gel was scanned. Digestion activity was plotted as a function of inhibitor concentration by quantifying the intensity of the digested bands with ImageJ software. The IC50 values were calculated as in our work on endonuclease inhibition [8]. The intensity of λ-DNA bands was subtracted from negative control (λ-DNA lane) and then normalized from the positive control (λ-DNA and PA protein lane without inhibitor).
The results are given in Figure 2 for the inhibition at 100 µM for each macrocycle and in Figure 3 for the four active inhibitor molecules for varying concentrations. IC50 values are summarized in Table 1, full data is provided in the ESI (Figures S3–S6).
The three dimensional structure of the PA endonuclease domain of the H3N2 Influenza strain has been determined by White et al. [9], shown below in Figure 4 with a charge coded surface and provided a base to carry out blind docking studies and more refined quantum mechanical calculations on the interaction between the most effective inhibitor SC8a and the potential binding hot spots located across the enzyme surface. The presence of a sulfate anion in the recognition site was of use in fixing the initial position of the anion.
Blind docking calculations for the top poses of SC8a are summarized in Figure 5, while Figure 6 illustrates the main interacting residues for top SC8a pose resulting from blind docking calculations into the PA cavity. Details on the main interacting residues for this pose are shown in Table 2.
Quantum mechanical calculations performed within the density functional theory framework confirm the pivotal role played by the region of the protein in close contact to the top pose of SC8a, whose scoring function value is differentiated from the rest of poses (see Figure S7). More specifically, Lys34 and Lys115 residues largely contribute to the stabilization of the binding site with associated pairwise energy of −274.6 kcal/mol and −322.6 kcal/mol, respectively, through electrostatic interactions, shape complementarity and a network of hydrogen bonds. His41 residue presents also a minor contribution with –18.1 kcal/mol compared to the global binding energy. It is also noticeable that the large positive energy with Glu114, which is predicted at 248.6 kcal/mol. It is worth noting that the electronic attraction/repulsion forces play a pivotal role in pairwise energies so that the predicted repulsion with that specific residue is the logical consequence of the close location of negatively charged species. However, the final balance significantly stabilizes the binding site by the other attractive contacts, especially by interacting with Lys34 and Lys115, as discussed above. For the records, the other four poses show other probable binding sites for SC8a However, all distant from the catalytic site and so may be presumed to have no effect on inhibition of the endonuclease.

3. Discussion

The amino acid sequences for the construct used in the inhibition studies and the docking studies are not identical, this does not affect comparison as the 130–140 sequence that is essential for binding is fully conserved in the two structures. The two sequences are given below in Figure 6.
Comparison of the two sequences shows a very high degree of conservation between the construct and the crystallographic protein and in particular that there is full conservation of the binding site found in the docking experiment.
The docking experiments show that there are five possible binding sites with the Pose 1 preferred binding site interacting with the Lys 34, Tyr 130 Lys 134, and Lys 137 residues. The local binding environment is shown below in Figure 7A. The four other possible binding sites which would have no effect on the endonuclease inhibition have been removed. Figure 7B shows the interacting residues at the pharmacophore pocket as defined by Credille et al. [39].
The inhibition experiments hint that both the size of the macrocyclic ring and the substitution have effects on the binding, as probably does conformational flexibility. Hence, neither SC4 and its derivatives nor C4diP show any inhibitory effects, this would imply that binding to more than one amino acid residue is required for enzyme inhibition. The solid-state structures of SC4 with Lys [40] or Arg [41] confirm that this system only binds a single amino acid. For the larger systems, SC6 and SC8 inhibitory effects occur for the SCNa molecules; this would be in line with binding to pharmacophore pockets 1 and 6, as shown in Figure 7 below. The lack of flexibility of the CD sulfate polyanion will rule out interaction across the two pockets, and thus it is inactive. The larger SC8a anion can bind to the K34, Y130, K134, and K137 residues while the smaller SC6a will probably bind only to two of these residues. This reduction in binding will be responsible for the increased IC50 6.4µM observed for SC8a compared to that of 11.2µM for SC6a.
Of some interest is the effect of the O-alkyl sulfonate substituent group on the inhibitory effect. It would be expected if the binding was uniquely electrostatic in nature that the addition of an additional negative charge, should increase the inhibitory effect.
The IC50 values decrease from 11.2 µM for SC6a to greater than 100 µM for SC6b and SC6c, and 6.4 µM, 14 µM, and 37 µM for SC8a, SC8b and SC8c respectively, from Figure 4 it can be seen that conformation of the calix[n]arene ring presents the hydroxyl in close spatial proximity thus substitution at the phenolic face will cause steric crowding and repulsion for the SCNc series of molecules. For the SCNb series, the difference can be explained by the difference in the alkyl-sulfonate group binding to the positive amino acids as compared to the aromatic sulfonate group binding.
In terms of inhibitor design, the anionic para-sulfonato-calix[n]arenes represent a different class of molecules than more classical pharmaceutical inhibitors, [42,43] in that they are strongly anionic large three-dimensional macrocycles as compared to relatively small basic nitrogen heterocyclic structures of the classic inhibitors. The binding experiments are based on analysis of the peptide sequence of the protein so as to verify the presence of suitable binding sites for this type of supramolecular system. Coleman’s group has already demonstrated that this type of sequence analysis based on para-sulfonato-calix[n]arene derivatives as a protein ligand enables the identification of other types of pharmaceutical targets, such as the Tau protein, which is involved in neurodegenerative diseases [24].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Calix[n]arenes

All chemicals were purchased from ACROS Organics or Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. Solvents were of chemical grade and were used without any purification.
The starting materials, calix[n]arenes were prepared by deterbutylation of para-tert-butylcalix[n]arenes, using the procedure described by Gutsche [44].
Para-sulfonato-calix[n]arenes SC4a, SC6a, and SC8a have been synthesized according to the procedure described by Coleman et al. [45].
Calix[n]arenes propane-3-sulfonic acid SC4b, SC6b and SC8b were synthesized by the reaction of these calix[n]arenes with propane-1,3-sultone described for para-tert-butyl-calix[6]arene by Shinkai et al. [46].
Para-sulfonato-alkylcalix[n]arenes propane-3-sulfonic acid SC4c, SC6c, and SC8c have been prepared following the procedure described by Hwang et al. [47] and adapting the procedure of Shinkai et al. [48]
Calix[4]arene dihydroxyphosphonic acid (C4diP) was synthesized by the method of Markovsky and Kalchenko [49].
All the physical characteristics of the synthesized calixarenes correspond to the literature values.
Sulfated β-cyclodextrin (CD) has been purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA).

4.2. Over-Expression and Purification of PA Endonuclease

The vector of PA endonuclease has been kindly sent by Dr. Kuzack from EMBL upon our request.
The DNA coding for PA-Nter (residues 1–198) from A/Victoria/3/1975 (H3N2) (Accession number: CY121202.1) was cloned into a pET-M11 expression vector (EMBL).
This vector was used to transform E. coli BL21 (DE3) RIL CodonPlus strain (Stratagene). The protein was expressed in LB medium over-night at 15 °C after induction with 0.1 mM isopropyl-β-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). The protein was first purified by an immobilized metal affinity column (IMAC) and then by gel filtration on a Superdex 200 column (GE Healthcare, Japan).
The final concentration of protein was estimated at 0.5 mg/mL with a purity superior to 95% (Figure S1). The purity of the protein was assessed by SDS PAGE. One µg of purified PA endonuclease was loaded (2 µL at 500 µg/mL) on the polyacrylamide gel and has revealed a unique and intense band by Coomassie staining. Since the limit of detection of Coomassie stain is 0.05 µg [50], we assumed that the purity of the endonuclease is superior to 95%.

4.3. PA Endonuclease Activity

The digestion activity of the purified PA endonuclease has been quantified on agarose gel electrophoresis. A concentration range of PA endonuclease (0.5 mg/mL until 0.5 µg/mL) has been mixed to 0.5 µg of λ-DNA (Takara, Japan) in a buffer at a final concentration of 20 mM Tris HCl pH 8, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM MnCl2, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol. After one hour of incubation at 37 °C, the samples have been deposited on agarose gel 0.6% previously mixed with Ethidium bromide and run over 90 min at 75 V. The gel was then scanned on ChemiDoc XRS system (Bio-Rad) (Figure S2)

4.4. PA Endonuclease Inhibition Assay for Macrocyclic Molecules

100 µM of each macrocyclic molecules β-CDsul, SC[n]a, SC[n]b, and SC[n]c (Figure 1) have been mixed to 0.5 µg of λ-DNA in a buffer at final concentration of 20 mM Tris HCl pH 8, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM MnCl2, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol.
The mixture was then mixed with the PA endonuclease enzyme at 0.5 mg/mL and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C.
The samples have been deposited on agarose gel 0.6% previously mixed with ethidium bromide and run over 90 min at 75 V. The gel was then scanned on the ChemiDoc XRS system (Bio-Rad).
The digestion activity is then plotted as a matter of inhibitor concentration by quantifying the intensity of the digested bands with ImageJ software.

4.5. Molecular Modeling Calculations

We performed molecular modeling studies in order to obtain information at the atomic level about the interactions between the different inhibitors studied and PA endonuclease. For such purpose, we employed docking calculations, which consist in the computer simulation of the energetics of the protein-ligand interactions and thus the estimation of binding affinity values and the structure the protein-ligand complexes adopt when the protein binds with the studied inhibitors.
Predictions obtained by docking simulations can reveal useful information [51] about the presence or absence of protein-ligand interactions and about how these interactions are established (electrostatic, van der Waals, hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic, etc.) and concerning which residues of the protein are involved. A representative protein X-ray crystal structure for each protein formulation was chosen at the Protein Data Bank (PDB) database (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb). For PA endonuclease, the structure with PDB identifier 4E5G was selected.
The full-atom models of the protein used in this study was prepared from the raw PDB structure 4E5G by removing water molecules, adding hydrogen atoms, assigning the ionization states of the amino acids by using Protein Preparation Wizard module as implemented in Maestro (Schrödinger Release 2016-4: Maestro, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, USA) [52]. Protonation states of all side chains were subsequently defined using PROPKA3.1. Partial charges over all atoms were finally assigned within the AMBER99 force field scheme as implemented in AmberTools (AMBER 2017, University of California, San Francisco) [53]. The docking of the inhibitors to the prepared protein structure model of PA endonuclease and the detailed binding energy calculations were performed with the Lead Finder v 1.1.10 software [54] using default configuration parameters. The size of the grid box for ligand docking was set to extend 60 A° in each direction from the geometric center of each individual docking simulation. The dG-score produced by Lead Finder was taken as the predicted value of the ligand binding energy. Only the top-ranked poses were used for structural and energy analyses.
We performed a blind docking approach [55] where multiple docking runs started around geometric centers of all residues within the selected threshold. A histogram with the resulting distribution of binding energies is shown in Figure S7, and the pose with the lowest energetic value is selected as the one that represents the experimental results.
For the top pose obtained in blind docking, pairwise energies are computed at the M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory [56,57] with the basis set superposition error (BSSE) as established in the well-known counterpoise method [58]. All quantum mechanical calculations were performed by using Gaussian09 [59]. More details on the molecular modeling calculation can be found in a previous paper [60].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we demonstrated that large flexible para-sulfonato-calix[n]arenes could inhibit in vitro H3N2 PA endonuclease. Combining the methodology of experimental inhibition studies and theoretical docking work has given us insights on the mechanism of endonuclease inhibition by para-sulfonato-calix[8]arene. The larger SC8a anion can bind to the K34, Y130, K134, and K137 residues of the DNA binding pharmacophore pocket and also interact at the catalytic site. The flexibility of calix[8]arene might also present an advantage against resistant virus strains, which has been mentioned as one of the only concern in the recent PA endonuclease inhibitor molecule Xofluza approved by FDA. Finally, the low animal toxicity of this class of molecules opens up the possibility of the design of totally novel active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) based on atypical anionic molecules.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/8/2/73/s1. Figure S1: Coomassie-stained gel SDS-PAGE of the PA protein purified from the bacterial extract. Molecular weight (MW) ladder (kDa) is shown on the right. Figure S2: Agarose gel electrophoresis shows the digestion activity of PA endonuclease protein. A concentration range of PA endonuclease protein has been mixed with λ-DNA phage. Molecular weight (MW) ladder (1kb) is shown on the right. Reaction products were run in a 0.6% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide, Figure S3: IC50 determination of H3N2 influenza PA endonuclease at 6.4 µM of SC8a on PA endonuclease. “+” means DNA and “−“ corresponds to DNA and PA endonuclease, Figure S4: IC50 determination of H3N2 influenza PA endonuclease at 14 µM of SC8b on PA endonuclease. “+” means DNA and “−“ corresponds to DNA and PA endonuclease, Figure S5: IC50 determination of H3N2 influenza PA endonuclease at 18.7 µM of SC8c on PA endonuclease. “+” means DNA and “−“ corresponds to DNA and PA endonuclease. Figure S6: IC50 determination of H3N2 influenza PA endonuclease at 11.2 µM of SC6a on PA endonuclease. “+” means DNA and “−“ corresponds to DNA and PA endonuclease. Figure S7: Histogram obtained from blind docking results. Estimated binding energy in Kcal/mol is shown on X-axis, while the number of poses or occurrences with binding energy values corresponding to a given interval is shown on Y-axis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization of the research, A.W.C., Y.T., and H.P.-S.; software, D.C.; validation, Y.T., F.P., and J.P.C.-C.; formal analysis, Y.T. and H.P.-S.; investigation, M.R.; resources, B.K.; original draft preparation, A.W.C., Y.T., and H.P.-S.; project administration, A.W.C.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CTQ2017-87974-R) and by the Fundacioń Seńeca del Centro de Coordinación de la Investigación de la Región de Murcia under Projects 20988/PI/18 and 20524/PDC/18. This research was partially supported by the e-infrastructure program of the Research Council of Norway, the supercomputer center of UiT—the Arctic University of Norway, and by the supercomputing infrastructure of Poznan Supercomputing Center.

Acknowledgments

Funding for a Project Professorship for AWC from the IIS, The University of Tokyo is acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Virus Investigation Team; Dawood, F.S.; Jain, S.; Finelli, L.; Shaw, M.W.; Lindstrom, S.; Garten, R.J.; Gubareva, L.V.; Xu, X.; Bridges, C.B.; et al. Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1). N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 2605–2615. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fraser, C.; Donnelly, C.; Cauchemez, S.; Hanage, W.; Van Kerkhove, M.; Hollingsworth, T.; Griffin, J.; Baggaley, R.; Jenkins, H.; Lyons, E.; et al. Pandemic Potential of a Strain of Influenza A (H1N1): Early Findings. Science 2009, 324, 1557–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Krammer, F.; Smith, G.J.D.; Fouchier, R.A.M.; Peiris, M.; Kedzierska, K.; Doherty, P.C.; Palese, P.; Shaw, M.L.; Treanor, J.; Webster, R.G.; et al. Influenza. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Garten, R.J.; Davis, C.T.; Russell, C.A.; Shu, B.; Lindstrom, S.; Balish, A.; Sessions, W.M.; Xu, X.; Skepner, E.; Deyde, V.; et al. Antigenic and genetic characteristics of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans. Science 2009, 325, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rehwinkel, J.; Tan, C.P.; Goubau, D.; Schulz, O.; Pichlmair, A.; Bier, K.; Robb, N.; Vreede, F.; Barclay, W.; Fodor, E.; et al. RIG-I detects viral genomic RNA during negative-strand RNA virus infection. Cell 2010, 140, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ernst, W.A.; Kim, H.J.; Tumpey, T.M.; Jansen, A.D.A.; Tai, W.; Cramer, D.V.; Adler-Moore, J.P.; Fujii, G. Protection against H1, H5, H6 and H9 influenza A infection with liposomal matrix 2 epitope vaccines. Vaccine 2006, 24, 5158–5168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Deyde, V.M.; Xu, X.; Bright, R.A.; Shaw, M.; Smith, C.B.; Zhang, Y.; Shu, Y.; Gubareva, L.V.; Cox, N.J.; Klimov, A.I. Surveillance of resistance to adamantanes among influenza A(H3N2) and A(H1N1) viruses isolated worldwide. J. Infect. Dis. 2007, 196, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schaduangrat, N.; Phanich, J.; Rungrotmongkol, T.; Lerdsamran, H.; Puthavathana, P.; Ubol, S. The significance of naturally occurring neuraminidase quasispecies of H5N1 avian influenza virus on resistance to oseltamivir: A point of concern. J. Gen. Virol. 2016, 97, 1311–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dubois, R.M.; Slavish, P.J.; Baughman, B.M.; Yun, M.K.; Bao, J.; Webby, R.J.; Webb, T.R.; White, S.W. Structural and biochemical basis for development of influenza virus inhibitors targeting the PA endonuclease. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ju, H.; Zhang, J.; Huang, B.; Kang, D.; Huang, B.; Liu, X.; Zhan, P. Inhibitors of influenza virus polymerase acidic (PA) Endonuclease: Contemporary developments and perspectives. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 3533–3551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yuan, S.; Wen, L.; Zhou, J. Inhibitors of Influenza A Virus Polymerase. ACS Infect. Dis. 2018, 4, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Reina, J.; Reina, N. Baloxavir marboxil: Un potente inhibidor de la endonucleasa cap-dependiente de los virus gripales. Rev. Esp. Quimioter. 2019, 32, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Hayden, F.G.; Sugaya, N.; Hirotsu, N.; Lee, N.; de Jong, M.D.; Hurt, A.C.; Ishida, T.; Sekino, H.; Yamada, K.; Portsmouth, S.; et al. Baloxavir Marboxil for Uncomplicated Influenza in Adults and Adolescents. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 913–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. O’Hanlon, R.; Shaw, M.L. Baloxavir marboxil: The new influenza drug on the market. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2019, 35, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shoji, M.; Takahashi, E.; Hatakeyama, D.; Iwai, Y.; Morita, Y.; Shirayama, R.; Echigo, N.; Kido, H.; Nakamura, S.; Mashino, T.; et al. Anti-Influenza Activity of C60 Fullerene Derivatives. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tauran, Y.; Anjard, C.; Kim, B.J.; Rhimi, M.; Coleman, A.W. Large negatively charged organic host molecules as inhibitors of endonuclease enzymes. Chem. Comm. 2014, 50, 11404–11406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pingoud, A.; Jeltsch, A. Structure and function of type II restriction endonucleases. Nucl. Acids Res. 2001, 29, 3705–3727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hileman, R.E.; Fromm, J.R.; Weiler, J.M.; Linhardt, R.J. Glycosaminoglycan-protein interactions: Definition of consensus sites in glycosaminoglycan binding proteins. BioEssays 1998, 20, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Govindaraju, A.; Cortez, J.D.; Reveal, B.; Christensen, S.M. Endonuclease domain of non-LTR retrotransposons: Loss-of-function mutants and modeling of the R2Bm endonuclease. Nucl. Acids Res. 2016, 44, 3276–3287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pingoud, A.; Wilson, G.G.; Wende, W. Type II restriction endonucleases—A historical perspective and more. Nucl. Acids. Res. 2014, 42, 7489–7527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Da Silva, E.; Ficheux, D.; Coleman, A.W. Anti-thrombotic activity of water-soluble calix[n]arenes. J. Incl. Phen. Macro. Chem. 2005, 52, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Moussa, A.; Coleman, A.W.; Shahgaldian, P.; Da Silva, E.; Martin, A.; Lazar, A.; Leclere, E.; Dupin, M.; Perron, H. Process for detecting PrP using a macrocyclic adjuvant ligand. FR Patent Application No 20060019311, 26 January 2006. [Google Scholar]
  23. Coleman, A.W.; Perret, F.; Cecillon, S.; Moussa, A.; Martin, A.; Dupin, M.; Perron, H. Enhanced detection of the pathogenic prion protein by its supramolecular association with para-sulfonato-calix[n]arene derivatives. New J. Chem. 2007, 31, 711–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cecillon, S.; Coleman, A.W.; Eveno-Nobile, A.; Perron, H.; Rodrigue, M. Method for Detecting Aggregate-Forming Circulating Protein Forms and Agent for Capturing Formed Aggregates. U.S. Patent Application No. US8158441B2, 17 April 2012. [Google Scholar]
  25. Perret, F.; Lazar, A.N.; Coleman, A.W. Biochemistry of the para-sulfonato-calix[n]arenes. Chem. Commun. 2006, 23, 2425–2438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Moriya, T.; Saito, K.; Kurita, H.; Matsumoto, K.; Otake, T.; Mori, H.; Morimoto, M.; Ueba, N.; Kunita, N. A new candidate for an anti-HIV-1 agent: Modified cyclodextrin sulfate (mCDS71). J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 1674–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Perret, F.; Coleman, A.W. Biochemistry of anionic calixarenes. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 7303–7319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mallipeddi, P.L.; Kumar, G.; White, S.W.; Webb, T.R. Recent advances in computer-aided drug design as applied to anti-influenza drug discovery. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2014, 14, 1875–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Coleman, A.W.; Bott, S.G.; David Morley, S.; Mitchell Means, C.; Robinson, K.D.; Zhang, H.; Atwood, J.A. Novel Layer Structure of Sodium Calix [4] arenesulfonate Complexes—A Class of Organic Clay Mimics? Angew. Chem. 1988, 27, 1361–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Danylyuk, O.; Suwinska, K. Solid-state interactions of calixarenes with biorelevant molecules. Chem. Commun. 2009, 5799–5813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Da Silva, E.; Memmi, L.; Coleman, A.W.; Rather, B.; Zaworotko, M.J. Synthesis and solid-state structures of mono-functionalised para-H-calix-[6]-arenes. J. Supramol. Chem. 2002, 1, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Perret, F.; Bonnard, V.; Danylyuk, O.; Suwinska, K.; Coleman, A.W. Conformational extremes in the supramolecular assemblies of para-sulfonato-calix [8] arene. New J. Chem. 2006, 30, 987–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Danylyuk, O.; Butkiewicz, H.; Coleman, A.W.; Suwinska, K. Host-guest complexes of local anesthetics with cucurbit [6] uril and para-sulfonatocalix [8] arene in the solid state. J. Mol. Struct. 2017, 1150, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Leśniewska, B.; Coleman, A.W.; Tauran, Y.; Perret, F.; Suwińska, K. Pseudopolymorphs—A variety of self-organization of para-sulfonato-calix [8] arene and phenanthroline in the solid state. CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 8858–8870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dias, A.; Bouvier, D.; Crepin, T.; McCarthy, A.A.; Hart, D.J.; Baudin, F.; Cusack, S.; Ruigrok, R.W.H. The cap-snatching endonuclease of influenza virus polymerase resides in the PA subunit. Nature 2009, 458, 914–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hu, Y.; Musharrafieh, R.; Ma, C.; Zhang, J.; Smee, D.F.; DeGrado, W.F.; Wang, J. An M2-V27A channel blocker demonstrates potent in vitro and in vivo antiviral activities against amantadine-sensitive and -resistant influenza A viruses. Antivir. Res. 2017, 140, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Ferraris, O.; Kessler, N.; Lina, B. Sensitivity of influenza viruses to zanamivir and oseltamivir: A study performed on viruses circulating in France prior to the introduction of neuraminidase inhibitors in clinical practice. Antivir. Res. 2005, 68, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Noshi, T.; Kitano, M.; Taniguchi, K.; Yamamoto, A.; Omoto, S.; Baba, K.; Hashimoto, T.; Ishida, K.; Kushima, Y.; Hattori, K.; et al. In Vitro characterization of baloxavir acid, a first-in-class cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor of the influenza virus polymerase PA subunit. Antivir. Res. 2018, 160, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Credille, C.V.; Dick, B.L.; Morrison, C.N.; Stokes, R.W.; Adamek, R.N.; Wu, N.C.; Wilson, I.A.; Cohen, S.M. Structure-Activity Relationships in Metal-Binding Pharmacophores for Influenza Endonuclease. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 10206–10217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Selkti, M.; Coleman, A.W.; Nicolis, I.; Douteau-Guével, N.; Villain, F.; Tomas, A.; de Rango, C. The first example of a substrate spanning the calix [4] arene bilayer: The solid state complex of p-sulfonatocalix [4] arene with L-lysine. Chem. Commun. 2000, 161–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lazar, A.; Da Silva, E.; Navaza, A.; Barbey, C.; Coleman, A.W. A new packing motif for para-sulfonatocalix [4] arene: The solid state structure of the para-sulfonatocalix [4] arene D-arginine complex. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2162–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yousaf, A.; Abd Hamid, S.; Bunnori, N.M.; Ishola, A.A. Applications of calixarenes in cancer chemotherapy: Facts and perspectives. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2015, 9, 2831–2838. [Google Scholar]
  43. Tauran, Y.; Coleman, A.W.; Perret, F.; Kim, B. Cellular and in Vivo Biological Activities of the Calix [n] arenes. Curr. Org. Chem. 2015, 19, 2250–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gutsche, C.D.; Lin, L.G. Calixarene 12: The Synthesis of Functionalized Calixarene. Tetrahedron. 1986, 42, 1633–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Coleman, A.W.; Jebors, S.; Cecillon, S.; Perret, P.; Garin, D.; Marti-Battle, D.; Moulin, M. Toxicity and biodistribution of para-sulfonato-calix [4] arene in mice. New J. Chem. 2008, 32, 780–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shinkai, S.; Arimura, T.; Arak, K.; Kawabata, H.J. Syntheses and aggregation properties of new water-soluble calix [n] arenes. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1989, 1, 2039–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hwang, K.M.; Qi, Y.M.; Liu, S.Y.; Lee, T.C.; Choy, W.; Chen, J. Antithrombotic Treatment with Calixarene Compounds. U.S. Patent Application No. US5409959A, 25 April 1995. [Google Scholar]
  48. Shinkai, S.; Mori, S.; Koreishi, H.; Tsubakiand, T.; Manabe, O. Hexasulfonated calix [6] arene derivatives: A new class of catalysts, surfactants, and host molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 2409–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kalchenko, V.I.; Rudkevich, D.M.; Markovskii, L.N. Reactive exophosphorylated benzo-crown esters. Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii 1990, 60, 2813–2814. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zahid, A.; Jamil, W.; Begum, R. Method Development and Validation of SDS-PAGE for Quality Control Testing of Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2a. IOSR J. Pharm. Biol. 2014, 9, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Navarro-Fernandez, J.; Pérez-Sánchez, H.; Martinez-Martinez, I.; Meliciani, I.; Guerrero, J.A.; Vicente, V.; Corral, J.; Wenzel, W.J. In silico discovery of a compound with nanomolar affinity to antithrombin causing partial activation and increased heparin affinity. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 6403–6412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sastry, G.M.; Adzhigirey, M.; Day, T.; Annabhimoju, R.; Sherman, W. Protein and ligand preparation: Parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2013, 27, 221–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Case, D.A.; Cerutti, D.S.; Cheatham, T.E., III; Darden, T.A.; Duke, R.E.; Giese, T.J.; Gohlke, H.; Goetz, A.W.; Greene, D.; Homeyer, N.; et al. AMBER 2017; University of California: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2017. Available online: http://ambermd.org/doc12/Amber17.pdf (accessed on 31 May 2017).
  54. Stroganov, O.V.; Novikov, F.N.; Stroylov, V.S.; Kulkov, V.; Chilov, G.G. Lead finder: An approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 2371–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sánchez-Linares, I.; Pérez-Sánchez, H.; Cecilia, J.; García, J. High-throughput parallel blind virtual screening using BINDSURF. BMC Bioinf. 2012, 13, S13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D.G. Density functionals with broad applicability in chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D.G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: Two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 215–241. [Google Scholar]
  58. Boys, S.; Bernardi, F. The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of separate total energies. Some procedures with reduced errors. Mol. Phys. 1970, 19, 553–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Janesko, B.G.; Hratchian, H.P.; Ortiz, J.V.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision E.01, Fox, Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009.
  60. Tapia-Abellán, A.; Angosto-Bazarra, D.; Martínez-Banaclocha, H.; de Torre-Minguela, C.; Cerón-Carrasco, J.P.; Pérez-Sánchez, H.; Arostegui, J.I.; Pelegrin, P. MCC950 closes the active conformation of NLRP3 to an inactive state. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2019, 15, 560–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The sequence of the H3N2 endonuclease construct used in the current study, R/KXXR/K sites are marked in red. The binding pocket for SC8a is shown in bold 12pts.
Figure 1. The sequence of the H3N2 endonuclease construct used in the current study, R/KXXR/K sites are marked in red. The binding pocket for SC8a is shown in bold 12pts.
Antibiotics 08 00073 g001
Scheme 1. Structures of the molecules used in the current publication.
Scheme 1. Structures of the molecules used in the current publication.
Antibiotics 08 00073 sch001
Figure 2. Agarose gel electrophoresis showing the inhibition activity of different macrocyclic molecules at 100 µM on the digestion of DNA-Lambda phage by PA endonuclease protein. Molecular weight (MW) ladder (kb) is shown on the right.
Figure 2. Agarose gel electrophoresis showing the inhibition activity of different macrocyclic molecules at 100 µM on the digestion of DNA-Lambda phage by PA endonuclease protein. Molecular weight (MW) ladder (kb) is shown on the right.
Antibiotics 08 00073 g002
Figure 3. Scatter plot of digested DNA fraction as a function of calix[n]arene derivative concentration mixed with the couple DNA/endonuclease PA. IC50 corresponds to the calix[n]arene derivative concentration that reduces 50% of the PA endonuclease activity. Errors bars correspond to the standard deviation of 3 different measurements. IC50 of H3N2 endonuclease PA was determined for SCa at 6.4 µM (A), SC8b at 14 µM (B), SC6a at 11.2 µM (C), and for SC8c at 18.7 µM (D).
Figure 3. Scatter plot of digested DNA fraction as a function of calix[n]arene derivative concentration mixed with the couple DNA/endonuclease PA. IC50 corresponds to the calix[n]arene derivative concentration that reduces 50% of the PA endonuclease activity. Errors bars correspond to the standard deviation of 3 different measurements. IC50 of H3N2 endonuclease PA was determined for SCa at 6.4 µM (A), SC8b at 14 µM (B), SC6a at 11.2 µM (C), and for SC8c at 18.7 µM (D).
Antibiotics 08 00073 g003
Figure 4. The three-dimensional structure of the PA endonuclease domain of the H3N2 Influenza strain with the top pose obtained from blind docking calculations for SC8a (in sticks), the surface is color-coded with positive charge shown in blue and negative charge shown in red. The SC8a structure used is CCDC 970626 from [34].
Figure 4. The three-dimensional structure of the PA endonuclease domain of the H3N2 Influenza strain with the top pose obtained from blind docking calculations for SC8a (in sticks), the surface is color-coded with positive charge shown in blue and negative charge shown in red. The SC8a structure used is CCDC 970626 from [34].
Antibiotics 08 00073 g004
Figure 5. Molecular interactions between PA endonuclease and SC8a for the top poses predicted by blind docking.
Figure 5. Molecular interactions between PA endonuclease and SC8a for the top poses predicted by blind docking.
Antibiotics 08 00073 g005
Figure 6. Overlay of the amino-acid sequences; above is the sequence Seq1of the construct used in the inhibition studies, below is the sequence Seq2 for the crystallographic study used in the docking experiment. The binding site 130–138 from the docking study is given in bold and underlined for clarity. * corresponds to retained identities.
Figure 6. Overlay of the amino-acid sequences; above is the sequence Seq1of the construct used in the inhibition studies, below is the sequence Seq2 for the crystallographic study used in the docking experiment. The binding site 130–138 from the docking study is given in bold and underlined for clarity. * corresponds to retained identities.
Antibiotics 08 00073 g006
Figure 7. Blind docking results for top pose obtained; (A) cartoon representation of H3N2 endonuclease DNA binding site and (B) main interacting residues around the active site for the top SC8a pose are depicted in stick format. Color codes are specified in Table 2.
Figure 7. Blind docking results for top pose obtained; (A) cartoon representation of H3N2 endonuclease DNA binding site and (B) main interacting residues around the active site for the top SC8a pose are depicted in stick format. Color codes are specified in Table 2.
Antibiotics 08 00073 g007
Table 1. IC50 values for inhibition of influenza virus pharmaceutical targets. Commercially available drugs that inhibit M2 channel, neuraminidase and PA endonuclease targets are in green. PA endonuclease inhibitors assessed only by in vitro assays are in yellow. Molecules investigated in this study are color coded in red to show inhibition below 20 µM, and in grey for none inhibition observed under 100 µM.
Table 1. IC50 values for inhibition of influenza virus pharmaceutical targets. Commercially available drugs that inhibit M2 channel, neuraminidase and PA endonuclease targets are in green. PA endonuclease inhibitors assessed only by in vitro assays are in yellow. Molecules investigated in this study are color coded in red to show inhibition below 20 µM, and in grey for none inhibition observed under 100 µM.
TargetMoleculesInhibition Activity IC50 (μM)ReferenceAvailable Commercially (Trade Name)
M2 ChannelAmantadine15.7 [36]Yes (Flumadine)
Rimantadine10.8Yes (Symmetrel)
NeuraminidaseZanamivir0.002[37]Yes (Relenza)
Oseltamivir carboxylate 0.00067Yes (Tamiflu)
PA endonucleaseBaloxavir Acid0.00023[38]Yes (Xofluza)
4-dioxo-4-phenylbutanoic acid21.3[10] No
5-hydroxy-4-pyridone-3-carboxy acid3.23No
5-hydroxypyrimidin-4(3H)-one0.15No
SC4a>100 No
SC6a11.2 ± 3.6
SC8a6.4 ± 1.4
SC4b>100
SC6b>100
SC8b14.0 ± 2.2
SC4c>100
SC6c>100
SC8c18.7 ± 0.7
C4diP>100
CD>100
Table 2. Main interacting residues between top BD pose and H3N2 endonuclease.
Table 2. Main interacting residues between top BD pose and H3N2 endonuclease.
Type of InteractionsInteracting Residues
HydrophobicTYR24, TYR111
Pi StackingTYR24, HIS41
Hydrogen BondsTHR32, ASN33, LYS34, VAL103, ARG106, TYR111, GLU114, SER175, ALA179
Salt BridgesHIS41, LYS115, LYS118

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tauran, Y.; Cerón-Carrasco, J.P.; Rhimi, M.; Perret, F.; Kim, B.; Collard, D.; Coleman, A.W.; Pérez-Sánchez, H. Size and Flexibility Define the Inhibition of the H3N2 Influenza Endonuclease Enzyme by Calix[n]arenes. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8020073

AMA Style

Tauran Y, Cerón-Carrasco JP, Rhimi M, Perret F, Kim B, Collard D, Coleman AW, Pérez-Sánchez H. Size and Flexibility Define the Inhibition of the H3N2 Influenza Endonuclease Enzyme by Calix[n]arenes. Antibiotics. 2019; 8(2):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8020073

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tauran, Yannick, José Pedro Cerón-Carrasco, Moez Rhimi, Florent Perret, Beomjoon Kim, Dominique Collard, Anthony W. Coleman, and Horacio Pérez-Sánchez. 2019. "Size and Flexibility Define the Inhibition of the H3N2 Influenza Endonuclease Enzyme by Calix[n]arenes" Antibiotics 8, no. 2: 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8020073

APA Style

Tauran, Y., Cerón-Carrasco, J. P., Rhimi, M., Perret, F., Kim, B., Collard, D., Coleman, A. W., & Pérez-Sánchez, H. (2019). Size and Flexibility Define the Inhibition of the H3N2 Influenza Endonuclease Enzyme by Calix[n]arenes. Antibiotics, 8(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8020073

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop