Laboratory Investigation on Physical, Rheological Thermal and Microscopic Characteristics of Water-Foamed Asphalt under Three Environmental Conditions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials
2.1. Bitumen
2.2. Preparation of Water-Foamed Asphalt
3. Characterization and Performance Testing
3.1. Three environmental Conditions Procedure
3.1.1. High-Temperature Evaporation Procedure
3.1.2. Low-Temperature Frozen Procedure
3.1.3. Freeze–Thaw Cycle Procedure
3.2. Asphalt Binder Test Methods
3.2.1. Conventional Physical Properties Test
3.2.2. Dynamic Shear Rheometer Test (DSR)
3.2.3. Differential Scanning Calorimetry Test (DSC)
3.2.4. Scanning Electron Microscope Test (SEM)
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Physical Properties
4.1.1. The influence of High-Temperature Evaporation on Physical Properties
4.1.2. The influence of Low-Temperature Frozen on Physical Properties
4.1.3. The Influence of F–T Cycle on Physical Properties
4.2. Thermal Properties
4.3. Rheological Properties
4.3.1. Temperature Sweep Test Results
4.3.2. Frequency Sweep Test Results
4.4. Microscopic Properties
5. Conclusions
- ●
- Conventional physical properties test results showed that the performance of the foamed binder had declined under three environmental processes. With the increase of process time, the softening point and viscosity of foamed asphalt increased, and the penetration and ductility decreased. Moreover, the foamed asphalt gradually returned to the characteristics before being foamed, with the increase of process time.
- ●
- A comprehensive evaluation index, deterioration degree was proposed based on the conventional physical properties test results and entropy theory, and the deterioration process of foamed binder under three environmental conditions was quantified. The F–T cycles have been proved to have the most significant influence on the performance of foamed binder among three environmental factors, which is a key issue that limits the application and promotion of foamed asphalt in seasonal frozen regions.
- ●
- DSR test showed that the rutting factor of foamed asphalt had been increased by 23.6–38.1% after F–T cycles, which indicated that the resistance to high-temperature permanent deformation of foamed binder was improved after F–T cycles. The loss modulus of foamed binder increased after F–T cycles, and the fatigue resistance became worse.
- ●
- Storage modulus results indicated that the recovery ability of the foamed asphalt after F–T cycles was similar to original foamed asphalt under high temperature and low frequency conditions, and the foamed asphalt had a stronger deformation recovery ability after F–T cycles under a moderate temperature and high frequency condition. The sensitivity analysis of a complex modulus to frequency showed that foamed asphalt after F–T cycles was more sensitive to the loading frequency and less sensitive to the temperature.
- ●
- The glass transition temperature of base asphalt and foamed asphalt was −29.77 °C and −15.88 °C, respectively, indicating that the low-temperature properties of asphalt decreased after foaming. The aggregate transition temperature of both asphalt samples was less than 55 °C, which proved the foaming process of a binder was a physical phenomenon. The endothermic peak data of DSC curves showed that the reduced total endothermic peak area caused by the F–T cycles was greater than that caused by frozen process, and the foamed asphalt after the F–T cycles had a wider endothermic temperature range than foamed asphalt after the frozen process. This indicated the F–T cycles had the most serious impact on foamed asphalt, which is also consistent with the conventional physical properties test results.
- ●
- SEM test demonstrated that the circular “cavitation” emerged on the asphalt surface and asphalt was in a fluffy state after foaming. This microstructure played an “isolation” role in the asphalt, reducing the overall viscosity of the engineering mixing temperature. After F–T cycles, the circular “cavitation” gradually disappeared, and the microscopic morphology was similar to that of base asphalt after F–T cycles. This indicated that the moisture of foamed asphalt was gradually precipitated and the self-healing phenomenon occurred during F–T cycles.
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Guo, W.; Guo, X.D.; Chen, X. Aggregate-Bitumen Interface Enhancement Mechanism of Utilization of Oil shale Waste as Fine Aggregate in Open Grade Friction Course. Coatings 2019, 9, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yu, J.; Ren, Z.; Gao, Z. Recycled Heavy Bio Oil as Performance Enhancer for Rubberized Bituminous Binders. Polymers 2019, 11, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pasetto, M.; Baldo, N. Unified approach to fatigue study of high performance recycled asphalt concretes. Mater. Struct. 2017, 50, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karnati, S.R.; Oldham, D.; Fini, E.H.; Zhang, L.F. Surface functionalization of silica nanoparticles to enhance aging resistance of asphalt binder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 211, 1065–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mousavi, M.; Pahlavan, F.; Oldham, D. Multiscale investigation of oxidative aging in biomodified asphalt binder. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016, 120, 17224–17233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.G.; Hao, P.W.; Liu, H.Y. Investigation of early-stage strength for cold recycled asphalt mixture using foamed asphalt. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 127, 410–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hailesilassie, B.W.; Hugener, M.; Partl, M.N. Influence of foaming water content on foam asphalt mixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 85, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozturk, H.I.; Kutay, M.E. Novel Testing Procedure for Assessment of Quality of Foamed Warm Mix Asphalt Binders. J. Mater. Civil. Eng. 2014, 26, 04014042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, H.F.; Lu, J.; VanReken, T.M. Modeling the Effects on Energy and Carbon Dioxide from the Use of Recycled Asphalt Pavement in Hot Mix Asphalt. Int. J. Sustain. Trans. 2014, 8, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abreu, L.P.P.; Oliveira, J.R.M.; Silva, H.M.R.D. Recycled asphalt mixtures produced with high percentage of different waste materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 8, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lwanski, M.; Chomicz-Kowalska, A.; Maciejewski, K. Application of synthetic wax for improvement of foamed bitumen parameters. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 83, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Arega, Z.A.; Bhasin, A.; Li, W.; Newcomb, D.E. Characteristics of Asphalt Binders Foamed in the Laboratory to Produce Warm Mix Asphalt. J. Mater. Civil. Eng. 2014, 26, 0414078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, F.T.; Chong, Y.C.; Nyunt, T.T.; Loi, S.S. Development of environmentally sustainable pavement mix. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 2013, 6, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.H.; Wang, G.; Ahn, Y.H. Effects of Using Recycled Asphalt Shingles in Open Graded Friction Course on Flexible Pavement Performance. J. Test. Eval. 2014, 42, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, W.; Guo, X.D.; Chen, X. Properties Analysis of Oil Shale Waste as Partial Aggregate Replacement in Open Grade Friction Course. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Santero, N.J.; Masanet, E.; Horvath, A. Life-cycle assessment of pavements. Part I: Critical review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 55, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubio, M.C.; Martinez, G.; Baena, L. Warm mix asphalt: An overview. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 24, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamshidi, A.; Hamzah, M.O.; You, Z.P. Performance of Warm Mix Asphalt containing Sasobit (R): State-oF–The-art. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 38, 530–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barigi, B.K.; Mannan, U.A.; Tarefder, R.A. Tribological Approach to Demonstrate Workability of Foamed Warm-Mix Asphalt. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2019, 31, 04019191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barigi, B.K.; Mannan, U.A.; Tarefder, R.A. Influence of foaming on tribological and rheological characteristics of foamed asphalt. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 205, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Capitao, S.D.; Picado-Santos, L.G.; Martinho, F. Pavement engineering materials: Review on the use of warm-mix asphalt. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 36, 1016–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, M.R.M.; You, Z.P. Comparative study of ethanol foamed asphalt binders and mixtures prepared via manual injection and laboratory foaming device. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2019, 6, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, Y.; Cai, Y.X.; Zang, Z.S. Dynamic Characteristics of Warm Mix Foamed Asphalt Mixture in Seasonal Frozen Area. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 1825643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martinez-Arguelles, G.; Giustozzi, F.; Crispino, M. Laboratory investigation on mechanical performance of cold foamed bitumen mixes: Bitumen source, foaming additive, fiber-reinforcement and cement effect. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 93, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kheradmand, B.; Munuandy, R.; Hua, L.T. An overview of the emerging warm mix asphalt technology. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2014, 15, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, D.D.; Yan, K.Z.; You, L.Y. Modification mechanism of asphalt modified with Sasobit and Polyphosphoric acid (PPA). Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 143, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.; Huang, B.S.; Shu, X. Comparative evaluation of warm mix asphalt containing high percentages of reclaimed asphalt pavement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 44, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, A.; Bahia, H. Asphalt binder contribution to mixture workability and application of asphalt lubricity test to estimate compact ability temperatures for warm-mix asphalt. Transp. Res. Rec. 2013, 2371, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diab, A.; You, Z. Rheological characteristics of nano-sized hydrated lime-modified foamed warm mix asphalt. Pavement Mater. Struct. Perform 2014, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, L.Y.; You, Z.P.; Dai, Q.L. Characteristics of Water-Foamed Asphalt Mixture under Multiple Freeze-Thaw Cycles: Laboratory Evaluation. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2018, 30, 04018270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, M.R.M.; You, Z.P. Ethanol based foamed asphalt as potential alternative for low emission asphalt technology. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2016, 3, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hasan, M.R.M.; You, Z.P.; Porter, D. Laboratory moisture susceptibility evaluation of WMA under possible field conditions. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 101, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wielinski, J.; Hand, A.; Rausch, D.M. Laboratory and Field Evaluations of Foamed Warm-Mix Asphalt Projects. Transp. Res. Rec. 2009, 2126, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apeagyei, A.K. Evaluating Foamed Asphalt Stability Using Acoustic Emission Techniques. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2013, 25, 1291–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wahhab, H.I.A.; Baig, M.G.; Mahmoud, I.A. Study of road bases construction in Saudi Arabia using foam asphalt. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 26, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, M.R.M.; You, Z.P.; Yang, X. A comprehensive review of theory, development, and implementation of warm mix asphalt using foaming techniques. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 152, 115–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arega, Z.A.; Bhasin, A.; Li, W. Parametric Analysis of Factors That Affect Asphalt Binder Foaming Characteristics. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2015, 27, 04015052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, F.Q.; Yu, X.; Wang, T.Y. Influence of base asphalt aging levels on the foaming characteristics and rheological properties of foamed asphalt. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 177, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Punith, V.S.; Xiao, F.P.; Putman, B. Effects of long-term aging on moisture sensitivity of foamed WMA mixtures containing moist aggregates. Mater. Struct. 2012, 45, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu Qtaish, L.; Nazzal, M.D.; Abbas, A. Micromechanical and Chemical Characterization of Foamed Warm-Mix Asphalt Aging. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2018, 30, 04018213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Lee, H. Development of mix design procedure for cold in-place recycling with foamed asphalt. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2006, 18, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, F.; Arambula-Mercado, E.; Newcomb, D. Mix design procedure for foamed asphalt mixtures. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2016, 17, 946–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lwanski, M.; Mazurek, G.; Buczynski, P. Bitumen Foaming Optimisation Process on the Basis of Rheological Properties. Materials. 2018, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazzaz, M.; Darabi, M.K.; Little, D.N.; Garg, N. Effect of Evotherm-M1 on Properties of Asphaltic Materials Used at NAPMRC Testing Facility. J. Test. Eval. 2020, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darabi, M.K.; Huang, C.W.; Bazzaz, M.; Masad, E.A.; Little, D.N. Characterization and validation of the nonlinear viscoelastic-viscoplastic with hardening-relaxation constitutive relationship for asphalt mixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 216, 648–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazzaz, M.; Darabi, M.K.; Little, D.N.; Garg, N. A Straightforward Procedure to Characterize Nonlinear Viscoelastic Response of Asphalt Concrete at High Temperatures. Transp. Res. Rec. 2018, 28, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazzaz, M. Experimental and Analytical Procedures to Characterize Mechanical Properties of Asphalt Concrete Materials for Airfield Pavement Applications. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA, 31 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, W.; Guo, X.D.; Sun, M.Z. Evaluation of the Durability and the Property of an Asphalt Concrete with Nano Hydrophobic Silane Silica in Spring-Thawing Season. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- ASTM Standard Test Method for Penetration of Bituminous Materials; ASTM D5; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013.
- ASTM Standard Test Method for Softening Point of Bitumen (Ring-and-Ball Apparatus); ASTM D36; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013.
- ASTM Standard Test Method for Ductility of Asphalt Materials; ASTM D113; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017.
- Guo, W.; Guo, X.D.; Chang, M.Y. Evaluating the Effect of Hydrophobic Nanosilica on the Viscoelasticity Property of Asphalt and Asphalt Mixture. Materials 2018, 11, 2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Technical Parameters | 25 °C Penetration | 15 °C Ductility | Softening Point | Wax Content | Flash Point | Density |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Units | mm | cm | °C | % | °C | g·cm−3 |
70# | 67.6 | >100 | 52.1 | 1.5 | 287 | 1.003 |
Test procedure | T 0606 | T 0605 | T 0606 | T 0615 | T 0611 | T 0603 |
Type | Cycles | 25 °C Penetration/mm | PI Value | Softening Point/°C | 135 °C Viscosity/mpa.s | 25 °C Ductility/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
70# asphalt | 0 | 67.6 | 0.5 | 52.1 | 775 | 155 |
1 | 66.8 | 0.5238 | 52.7 | 798 | 133 | |
2 | 63.7 | 0.544 | 53.13 | 807 | 139.8 | |
3 | 63.1 | 0.5437 | 53.88 | 812 | 128.3 | |
5 | 60.7 | 0.5846 | 54.46 | 823 | 109.8 | |
10 | 60.3 | 0.6033 | 55.4 | 846 | 95.9 | |
20 | 59.4 | 0.6664 | 55.61 | 859 | 72.3 | |
30 | 58.3 | 0.7053 | 55.8 | 889 | 54.7 | |
70# water-foamed asphalt | 0 | 71.9 | 0.25 | 48.8 | 619 | 130 |
1 | 70.7 | 0.3705 | 49.12 | 634 | 118.5 | |
2 | 69.6 | 0.4375 | 50.18 | 657 | 97.2 | |
3 | 68.4 | 0.494 | 50.52 | 666 | 82.4 | |
5 | 65.7 | 0.5414 | 51 | 689 | 618.8 | |
10 | 64.3 | 0.5606 | 51.9 | 703 | 51.7 | |
20 | 63.5 | 0.5954 | 52.5 | 719 | 34.3 | |
30 | 63.1 | 0.619 | 52.6 | 724.2 | 29.2 |
Type | Cycles | 25 °C Penetration/mm | PI Value | Softening Point/°C | 135 °C Viscosity/mpa.s | 25 °C Ductility/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
70# asphalt | 0 | 67.6 | 0.5 | 52.1 | 775 | 155 |
1 | 56.24 | 0.543 | 52.8 | 807 | 126.4 | |
2 | 55.37 | 0.584 | 53.3 | 823 | 92 | |
3 | 53.08 | 0.593 | 54 | 859 | 84 | |
5 | 47.4 | 0.625 | 54.7 | 878 | 69.5 | |
10 | 46.85 | 0.703 | 55.6 | 898 | 55.9 | |
20 | 46.5 | 0.766 | 56.1 | 921 | 47.3 | |
30 | 44.65 | 0.775 | 56.5 | 954.8 | 32.7 | |
70# water-foamed asphalt | 0 | 71.9 | 0.25 | 48.8 | 619 | 130 |
1 | 63.27 | 0.35 | 50.3 | 689 | 108.5 | |
2 | 60.9 | 0.475 | 51.4 | 779 | 87.2 | |
3 | 59.16 | 0.503 | 52.9 | 866 | 61.8 | |
5 | 56.29 | 0.59 | 54.3 | 903 | 44.6 | |
10 | 49.56 | 0.69 | 54.9 | 1022 | 31.7 | |
20 | 46.4 | 0.754 | 56.5 | 1090 | 23.5 | |
30 | 43.67 | 0.769 | 57.2 | 1148 | 19.2 |
Type | Temperature Range of Endothermic Peak (°C) | Endothermic Peak Area (J/g) | Total Endothermic Peak Area (J/g) | Endothermic Peak Height (W/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
70# asphalt | −79.70 to −43.96 | 1.48563 | 2.37756 | 0.08808 |
−30.65 to −0.51 | 0.15198 | 0.00897 | ||
2.99 to 40.64 | 0.63642 | 0.02955 | ||
40.64 to 55.14 | 0.10353 | 0.01197 | ||
70# foamed asphalt | −78.86 to 55.25 | 1.33244 | 2.49943 | 0.06842 |
−55.08 to −12.17 | 0.10639 | 0.00675 | ||
−11.67 to 38.47 | 0.3763 | 0.01118 | ||
40.63 to 52.13 | 0.6843 | 0.01908 |
Type | Temperature Range of Endothermic Peak (°C) | Endothermic Peak Area (J/g) | Total Endothermic Peak Area (J/g) | Endothermic Peak Height (W/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
70# foamed asphalt after 30 frozen cycles | −79.65875 to −57.6721 | 1.63173 | 2.00626 | 0.12816 |
−32.59482 to −29.9332 | 0.00347 | 0.00199 | ||
−0.47786 to 8.18376 | 0.03445 | 0.0077 | ||
9.68267 to 38.33634 | 0.11853 | 0.00634 | ||
40.83532 to 56.49773 | 0.12502 | 0.01459 | ||
66.1653 to 80.3256 | 0.01904 | 0.00193 | ||
92.98804 to 95.487 | 0.00523 | 0.0032 | ||
95.487 to 107.1518 | 0.06879 | 0.01279 | ||
70# foamed asphalt after 30 F–T cycles | −79.7153 to −60.41152 | 1.38191 | 1.66730 | 0.12271 |
−22.5309 to −21.36566 | 0.00151 | 0.00174 | ||
−0.89164 to 6.76853 | 0.12488 | 0.04287 | ||
32.91625 to 40.74777 | 0.02455 | 0.00553 | ||
43.24372 to 53.74433 | 0.09458 | 0.01608 | ||
90.5688 to 95.40174 | 0.01212 | 0.00362 | ||
102.732 to 112.0659 | 0.01645 | 0.00284 | ||
116.7311 to 119.3974 | 0.00503 | 0.00304 | ||
156.556 to 162.5536 | 0.00627 | 0.00126 |
Type | Temperature (°C) | δ (°) | G* (pa) | G’ (pa) | G*sin δ (pa) | G*/sin δ (pa) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foamed asphalt | 52 | 82.75 | 8826 | 1113 | 8756 | 8897 |
58 | 86.49 | 3553 | 403 | 3530 | 3576 | |
64 | 83.64 | 1600 | 117.3 | 1590 | 1610 | |
70 | 82.65 | 789.2 | 101 | 782.8 | 795.8 | |
76 | 83.09 | 419.3 | 50.46 | 416.3 | 422.4 | |
Foamed asphalt after 30 F–T cycles | 52 | 83.04 | 10912 | 1322 | 10831 | 10993 |
58 | 83.67 | 4684 | 516 | 4655 | 4712 | |
64 | 84.78 | 2070 | 188 | 2062 | 2078 | |
70 | 85.01 | 1094 | 95 | 1089 | 1098 | |
76 | 84.58 | 527.8 | 49 | 525.4 | 530.2 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Guo, W.; Guo, X.; Li, Y.; Dai, W. Laboratory Investigation on Physical, Rheological Thermal and Microscopic Characteristics of Water-Foamed Asphalt under Three Environmental Conditions. Coatings 2020, 10, 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10030239
Guo W, Guo X, Li Y, Dai W. Laboratory Investigation on Physical, Rheological Thermal and Microscopic Characteristics of Water-Foamed Asphalt under Three Environmental Conditions. Coatings. 2020; 10(3):239. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10030239
Chicago/Turabian StyleGuo, Wei, Xuedong Guo, Yingsong Li, and Wenting Dai. 2020. "Laboratory Investigation on Physical, Rheological Thermal and Microscopic Characteristics of Water-Foamed Asphalt under Three Environmental Conditions" Coatings 10, no. 3: 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10030239
APA StyleGuo, W., Guo, X., Li, Y., & Dai, W. (2020). Laboratory Investigation on Physical, Rheological Thermal and Microscopic Characteristics of Water-Foamed Asphalt under Three Environmental Conditions. Coatings, 10(3), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10030239