Next Article in Journal
Carbonation Resistance of Surface Protective Materials Modified with Hybrid NanoSiO2
Next Article in Special Issue
Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition of Zirconium Oxide Thin Films and Its Application to Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Nanosecond-Pulse Laser Assisted Cold Spraying of Al–Cu Aluminum Alloy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adsorption of Titanium Halides on Nitride and Oxide Surfaces during Atomic Layer Deposition: A DFT Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Coatings
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/coatings11030268
coatings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Low-Damage and Self-Limiting (Al)GaN Etching Process through Atomic Layer Etching Using O2 and BCl3 Plasma

by
Il-Hwan Hwang
1,
Ho-Young Cha
2,* and
Kwang-Seok Seo
1,*
1
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Inter-University Semiconductor Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744, Korea
2
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Hongik University, Seoul 121-791, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2021, 11(3), 268; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030268
Submission received: 14 December 2020 / Revised: 11 February 2021 / Accepted: 22 February 2021 / Published: 25 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Atomic Layer Deposition of Thin-Films)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This paper reports on the use of low-damage atomic layer etching (ALE) performed using O2 and BCl3 plasma for etching (Al)GaN. The proposed ALE process led to excellent self-limiting etch characteristics with a low direct current (DC) self-bias, which resulted in a high linearity between the etching depth and number of cycles. The etching damage was evaluated using several methods, including atomic force microscopy, photoluminescence (PL), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and the I–V properties of the recessed Schottky diodes were compared with those of digital etching performed using O2 plasma and HCl solution. The electrical characteristics of the recessed Schottky diode fabricated using the proposed ALE process were superior to those of the diodes fabricated using the conventional digital etching process. Moreover, the ALE process yielded a higher PL intensity and N/(Al + Ga) ratio of the etched AlGaN surface, along with a smoother etched surface.

1. Introduction

GaN-based high electron mobility transistors have been developed for use in high-frequency amplifiers and high-voltage power switching applications owing to their high breakdown voltage, large bandgap, and high electron carrier velocity [1]. In terms of device fabrication, GaN-related materials including AlGaN are physically and chemically stable, and thus, plasma etching is a typical technique to realize the etching of (Al)GaN. The etching process considerably influences the device characteristics, especially in cases in which the etch depth must be precisely controlled, and/or the plasma-induced damage must be minimized. For example, the current level and dynamic current collapse characteristics of recessed gate structures in field-effect transistors [2,3,4] or diodes [5,6,7] are considerably dependent on the recess depth and trap states at the etched surface. Although conventional plasma-etching methods, such as reactive ion etching (RIE) and inductively coupled plasma (ICP)-RIE [8,9,10,11], are still being widely used, a digital etching process involving the O2 plasma oxidation of (Al)GaN in conjunction with HCl:H2O solution-based oxide removal has received considerable attention owing to the associated low etching damage and easy control of the recess depth. However, this process is labor-intensive due to the combination of the plasma oxidation and wet etching processes and involves a low etch rate [12]. In this context, the realization of an atomic layer etching (ALE) process, which is an in situ digital etching process and has relatively high etch rates with low etching damage [13,14,15,16], is desirable. To exploit the advantages of the ALE process, the process conditions must be optimized to minimize the plasma-induced etching damage and to attain self-limiting characteristics to precisely control the etch depth.
To this end, in this study, we report on an ALE process performed using O2 and BCl3 plasma, which exhibits a low DC self-bias and self-limiting characteristics. The etching damage was evaluated using the atomic force microscopy (AFM), photoluminescence (PL), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) techniques, and the I–V characteristics of the Schottky diodes were compared with those of the diodes fabricated using the conventional digital etching process performed using O2 plasma and HCl solution.

2. Experiments

2.1. ALE Process

The ALE process was performed in a BMR HiEtch ICP etch system [17] (BMR Technology, New Jersey, NJ, USA) in which the chuck temperature was set to 5 °C using a helium backside cooling system and the chamber was evacuated using a turbo pump. A detailed system diagram is shown in Figure 1.
An AlGaN layer was oxidized using O2 plasma, and the oxidized layer was removed using the BCl3 plasma. The gas flow rates for O2 and BCl3 were 50 and 10 sccm, respectively. After the O2 and BCl3 plasma steps, a pumping step was conducted for 30 s to avoid sample contamination by any residual O2 or BCl3 gas. The pressures during the O2 and BCl3 plasma processes were 50 mTorr and 10 mTorr, respectively, and the effects of the ICP and bias powers on the DC self-bias were investigated, as shown in Figure 2. It was observed that the DC self-bias increased and decreased with an increase in the bias power and ICP power, respectively. Although the DC self-bias values measured in the system seemed to be too low considering a floating potential that could not be eliminated, it was clear that a lower DC self-bias could be achieved with a lower bias power and a higher ICP power. The exact evaluation of the floating potential was not able to be measured in the system. In order to reduce the ion bombardment energy at the surface, lower DC self-bias conditions were selected; bias powers of 3 and 2 W were selected for the O2 and BCl3 steps, respectively, during which the ICP power was set as 400 W.
The wafer structure used for the etching test consisted of a 3.8 nm GaN cap layer, a 22.6 nm AlGaN barrier layer, a 511 nm i-GaN channel layer, and a buffer layer grown on a Si substrate. First, the GaN cap layer was etched by Cl2/BCl3-based inductively coupled plasma-reactive ion etching. Then, a SiNx film was deposited as an etch mask layer. After the ALE process, the SiNx mask layer was removed using dilute hydrofluoric acid (DHF), and the etch depths of the samples were measured using the AFM technique. Figure 3 shows the etch rate per cycle of the ALE for varying O2 and fixed BCl3 plasma times per cycle and varying BCl3 and fixed O2 plasma times. The etch rate increased as the O2 plasma time increased to 60 s under constant BCl3 plasma times. Above 60 s, the etch rate remained fairly constant. Moreover, the etch rate increased as the BCl3 plasma time increased to 45 s at a fixed O2 plasma time of 60 s. Above 45 s, the etch rate was saturated.
As mentioned previously, the self-limiting behavior of ALE must be realized to ensure a high linearity between the etching depth and the number of cycles. Therefore, the etch rates of GaN and AlGaN when using BCl3 plasma were investigated under a fixed ICP power of 400 W and varying bias power, as shown in Figure 4.
The GaN and AlGaN layers were not etched at a bias power of 2 W, and the etch rates appeared to increase with an increase in the bias power. This finding indicates that the proposed ALE technique is a self-limiting etch process at the bias power of 2 W when using BCl3 plasma. Therefore, the optimized ALE process conditions were determined, as listed in Table 1.
A high linearity was noted between the etch depth and number of cycles in the ALE, indicating that the etch depth could be controlled in the digital etching technique, as shown in Figure 5.

2.2. Digital Etching Process

To realize the digital etching using O2 plasma and HCl solution, a microwave plasma asher was used to conduct the plasma oxidation, because microwave-excited plasma is characterized by a high density and low plasma-induced damage. Subsequently, an HCl: H2O (1:3) solution at 80 °C was used to remove the oxide because HCl can effectively remove oxides [18,19].
To examine the effect of the O2 plasma time, several O2 plasma times were considered for a fixed HCl dipping time. As shown in Figure 6, the etch rate per cycle increased as the O2 plasma time increased to 3 min. After 3 min, the etch rate remained constant. Under a fixed plasma oxidation time of 3 min and varying HCl dipping times, the etch rate increased as the HCl dipping time increased to 4 min and then stabilized.

2.3. Etching Damage Evaluation

The etching damage was evaluated using Schottky diodes fabricated on the etched n-GaN surfaces. We applied n-GaN-on-Si wafers that consisted of a 300 nm n-GaN drift layer with a-Si doping concentration of 2.5 × 1017 cm−3, a 700 nm highly doped n-GaN contact layer with a-Si doping concentration of (2–3) × 1018 cm−3, a 3900 nm GaN buffer layer, and a Si substrate. The device fabrication was initiated by solvent cleaning using acetone, methanol, and isopropanol. Subsequently, a SiNx passivation layer of 200 nm was deposited as a mask layer. Ohmic contacts were subsequently formed through Ti/Al metallization and rapid thermal annealing at 550 °C in an N2 ambient atmosphere for 1 min. The SiNx layer was opened through SF6-based RIE at 20 W, and the exposed GaN layer was etched to a depth of 5 nm by using two different methods, i.e., ALE and digital etching. After the SiNx opening process, Ni/Au (40/200 nm) metal electrodes were deposited through e-gun evaporation. The circular electrodes had diameters of 50 μm and were separated from a concentric contact with a gap of 15 μm. The device cross-section is shown in Figure 7.
The surface roughness of the AlGaN surfaces following the etching processes was evaluated using the AFM technique in the non-contact mode. Furthermore, the XPS analysis was conducted to investigate the stoichiometry of the etched surfaces. The surface roughness and XPS analysis were carried out with the witness wafers used for the etch rate test. The PL intensity was measured at room temperature to evaluate the etching damage of each digital etching process by using a 266 nm laser with a power density of 2 W/cm2. The wafer structure used for the PL measurement consisted of a 1000 nm i-GaN layer and a 300 nm buffer layer grown on a Si substrate.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 8 presents the I–V characteristics of the fabricated diodes and the ideality factors determined from the electrical measurements [20,21]. The ideality factor in the low forward bias region is an indicator for the trap-assisted recombination. As shown in Figure 8b, the slope of the forward bias region was not uniform for the digital etching case, which resulted in non-uniform ideality factor behavior in Figure 8d. On the other hand, the ALE case exhibited more uniform and lower ideality factor behavior at the low bias region. Therefore, it is suggested that the plasma-induced damage caused by the ALE process is less than that caused by the digital etching process. The increase in the ideality factor at the high forward bias region in Figure 8d is due to the fact that the diode current does not increase exponentially with the applied voltage [22,23]. The ideality factor determined at applied voltages of 0.1 to 0.3 V was ~1.1 and 1.8–2.5 for the diodes fabricated using the ALE and digital etching, respectively. The zero-bias barrier heights were 0.81 and 0.72 eV for the diodes fabricated using the ALE and digital etching, respectively, and a lower reverse current of 4.8 nA at −2 V occurred at the ALE diodes. These results indicated that the ALE incurred lower etching damage than the digital etching, resulting in better electrical characteristics.
To further investigate the etching damage, the PL intensity was measured at the etching depth of ~5 nm. As shown in Figure 9, a lower near-band-edge PL intensity was observed in the samples etched using the digital etching than those in the samples etched using the ALE. This finding indicated that fewer non-radiative recombination centers such as N vacancies were present in the sample etched using the ALE [24,25,26].
The chemical composition of the AlGaN surfaces was investigated using XPS analysis. The fitting results of Al 2p, Ga 3d, and N 1s peaks for the AlGaN samples etched using either ALE and digital etching are shown in Figure 10. Larger Al–O and Ga–O peak intensities were observed for the AlGaN surface etched using digital etching, which indicates that the ALE process is more effective for oxide removal in comparison with the digital etching process. In addition, the ratio of N/(Al + Ga) was 0.9 for the ALE sample and 0.82 for the digital etching sample, which suggests that fewer N vacancies were generated during the ALE process [27,28,29].
The surface morphologies of the etched samples were measured using the AFM technique. Figure 11 shows the images of a 3 × 3 μm2 area for the samples before and after etching. The root mean square values of the surface roughnesses for the ALE sample and digital etching sample were 0.2 and 0.25 nm, respectively, while the surface before etching was 0.19 nm. These results indicate that the generation of the N vacancies could be reduced using the ALE [30,31,32].

4. Conclusions

ALE using O2 and BCl3 plasma in an ICP-RIE system was developed to realize a self-limiting etching process with low etching damage. The ALE process conditions for the O2 plasma step were as follows: ICP power of 400 W, bias power of 3 W, chamber pressure of 50 mTorr, DC self-bias of 4 V, and plasma time of 60 s. The ALE process conditions for the BCl3 plasma step included ICP power of 400 W, bias power of 2 W, chamber pressure of 10 mTorr, DC self-bias of 3.8 V, and plasma time of 45 s, which resulted in the etch rate of 0.7 nm/cycle. The etching damage was investigated using various evaluation methods including AFM, PL, and XPS, and the I–V characteristics of recessed Schottky diodes were compared to those obtained using a conventional digital etching process using O2 plasma oxidation and HCl-solution-based oxide removal. The ALE using O2 and BCl3 plasma led to better electrical characteristics of the Schottky diodes, as well as higher PL intensity, increased N/(Al + Ga) ratio, and a smoother etched surface compared with those of the conventional digital etching process using O2 plasma and HCl solution. In addition, the ALE technique exhibited excellent self-limiting characteristics and ensured a high linearity between the etch depth and number of cycles. The proposed ALE process was noted to be promising to be applied for (Al)GaN etching, in which the precise control of the etch depth and low etching damage are necessary.

Author Contributions

I.-H.H. performed the experiments; conceptualization, I.-H.H., H.-Y.C., and K.-S.S.; methodology, I.-H.H., H.-Y.C., and K.-S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, I.-H.H., H.-Y.C., and K.-S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (10067636) and the Basic Science Research Program (No. 2015R1A6A1A03031833 and No. 2019R1A2C1008894).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chowdhury, S.; Stum, Z.; Li, Z.D.; Ueno, K.; Chow, T.P. Comparison of 600V Si, SiC and GaN power devices. Mater. Sci. Forum 2014, 971–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, Y.; Wang, C.; Zheng, X.; Ma, X.; He, Y.; Liu, K.; Li, A.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, C.; Hao, Y. Effects of recess depths on performance of AlGaN/GaN power MIS-HEMTs on the Si substrates and threshold voltage model of different recess depths for the using HfO2 gate insulator. Solid. State. Electron. 2020, 163, 107649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huang, S.; Jiang, Q.; Wei, K.; Liu, G.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Zheng, Y.; Sun, B.; Zhao, C.; Liu, H.; et al. High-temperature low-damage gate recess technique and ozone-assisted ALD-grown Al2O3 gate dielectric for high-performance normally-off GaN MIS-HEMTs. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, 15–17 December 2014; pp. 17.4.1–17.4.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. He, Y.; Gao, H.; Wang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, X.; Zhang, C.; Zheng, X.; Guo, L.; Ma, X.; Hao, Y. Comparative Study Between Partially and Fully Recessed-Gate Enhancement-Mode AlGaN/GaN MIS HEMT on the Breakdown Mechanism. Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Mater. Sci. 2019, 216, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Park, Y.; Kim, J.J.; Chang, W.; Jang, H.G.; Na, J.; Lee, H.; Jun, C.H.; Cha, H.Y.; Mun, J.K.; Ko, S.C.; et al. Low onset voltage of GaN on Si Schottky barrier diode using various recess depths. Electron. Lett. 2014, 50, 1164–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, R.; Chen, P.; Liu, M.; Zhou, J.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Ge, C.; Peng, H. 2.5-kV AlGaN/GaN Schottky Barrier Diode on Silicon Substrate with Recessed-anode Structure. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2021, 42, 208–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hu, J.; Stoffels, S.; Lenci, S.; De Jaeger, B.; Ronchi, N.; Tallarico, A.N.; Wellekens, D.; You, S.; Bakeroot, B.; Groeseneken, G.; et al. Statistical Analysis of the Impact of Anode Recess on the Electrical Characteristics of AlGaN/GaN Schottky Diodes with Gated Edge Termination. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2016, 63, 3451–3458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, J.Y.; Pan, C.J.; Chi, G.C. Electrical and optical changes in the near surface of reactively ion etched n-GaN. Solid State Electron. 1999, 43, 649–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shah, A.P.; Azizur Rahman, A.; Bhattacharya, A. Temperature-dependence of Cl 2/Ar ICP-RIE of polar, semipolar, and nonpolar GaN and AlN following BCl 3 /Ar breakthrough plasma. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2020, 38, 013001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, C.; Lu, W.; Piner, E.; Adesida, I. DC and microwave performance of recessed-gate GaN MESFETs using ICP-RIE. Solid State Electron. 2002, 46, 743–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Harrison, S.E.; Voss, L.F.; Torres, A.M.; Frye, C.D.; Shao, Q.; Nikoli, R.J. Ultradeep electron cyclotron resonance plasma etching of GaN. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 2017, 35, 061303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Buttari, D.; Heikman, S.; Keller, S.; Mishra, U.K. Digital Etching for Highly Reproducible Low Damage Gate Recessing on AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. In Proceedings of the IEEE Lester Eastman Conference on High Performance Devices, Newark, DE, USA, 8 August 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fukumizu, H.; Sekine, M.; Hori, M.; Kanomaru, K.; Kikuchi, T. Atomic layer etching of AlGaN using Cl2 and Ar gas chemistry and UV damage evaluation. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2019, 37, 021002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ohba, T.; Yang, W.; Tan, S.; Kanarik, K.J.; Nojiri, K. Atomic layer etching of GaN and AlGaN using directional plasma-enhanced approach. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Burnham, S.D.; Boutros, K.; Hashimoto, P.; Butler, C.; Wong, D.W.S.; Hu, M.; Micovic, M. Gate-recessed normally-off GaN-on-Si HEMT using a new O2- BCl3 digital etching technique. Phys. Status Solidi Curr. Top. Solid State Phys. 2010, 7, 2010–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, Q.; Li, S.; Li, T.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Wu, Y. Channel engineering of normally-OFF AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMTs by atomic layer etching and high-κDielectric. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2018, 39, 1377–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, H.K.; Lin, H.; Ra, Y. Etching mechanism of a GaN/InGaN/GaN heterostructure in Cl2- and CH4-based inductively coupled plasmas. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 2004, 22, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Selvanathan, D.; Mohammed, F.M.; Bae, J.-O.; Adesida, I.; Bogart, K.H.A. Investigation of surface treatment schemes on n-type GaN and Al0.20Ga0.80N. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Microelectron. Nanom. Struct. 2005, 23, 2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sohal, R.; Dudek, P.; Hilt, O. Comparative study of NH4OH and HCl etching behaviours on AlGaN surfaces. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 2210–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maffeis, T.G.G.; Simmonds, M.C.; Clark, S.A.; Peiro, F.; Haines, P.; Parbrook, P.J. Influence of premetallization surface treatment on the formation of Schottky Au-nGaN contacts. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 92, 3179–3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Abdalla, S.; Marzouki, F.; Al-ameer, S.; Turkestani, S. Electric Properties of n-GaN: Effect of Different Contacts on the Electronic Conduction. Int. J. Phys. 2013, 1, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Diale, M.; Auret, F.D. Effects of chemical treatment on barrier height and ideality factors of Au/GaN Schottky diodes. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2009, 404, 4415–4418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kane, S.N.; Mishra, A.; Dutta, A.K. Preface: International Conference on Recent Trends in Physics (ICRTP 2016). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2016, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Qiu, R.; Lu, H.; Chen, D.; Zhang, R.; Zheng, Y. Optimization of inductively coupled plasma deep etching of GaN and etching damage analysis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 2700–2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, Z.Z.; Qin, Z.X.; Tong, Y.Z.; Ding, X.M.; Hu, X.D.; Yu, T.J.; Yang, Z.J.; Zhang, G.Y. Etching damage and its recovery in n-GaN by reactive ion etching. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2003, 334, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nakano, Y.; Kawakami, R.; Niibe, M. Generation of electrical damage in n-GaN films following treatment in a CF4 plasma. Appl. Phys. Express 2017, 10, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Niibe, M.; Maeda, Y.; Kawakami, R.; Inaoka, T.; Tominaga, K.; Mukai, T. Surface analysis of n-GaN crystal damaged by RF-plasma-etching with Ar, Kr, and Xe gases. Phys. Status Solidi Curr. Top. Solid State Phys. 2011, 8, 435–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kawakami, R.; Inaoka, T.; Minamoto, S.; Kikuhara, Y. Analysis of GaN etching damage by capacitively coupled RF Ar plasma exposure. Thin Solid Film. 2008, 516, 3478–3481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, Z.; Asano, A.; Imamura, M.; Ishikawa, K.; Takeda, K.; Kondo, H.; Oda, O.; Sekine, M.; Hori, M. Thermally enhanced formation of photon-induced damage on GaN films in Cl2 plasma. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aroulanda, S.; Patard, O.; Altuntas, P.; Michel, N.; Pereira, J.; Lacam, C.; Gamarra, P.; Delage, S.L.; Defrance, N.; De Jaeger, J.-C.; et al. Cl2/Ar based atomic layer etching of AlGaN layers. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2019, 37, 041001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kauppinen, C.; Khan, S.A.; Sundqvist, J.; Suyatin, D.B.; Suihkonen, S.; Kauppinen, E.I.; Sopanen, M. Atomic layer etching of gallium nitride (0001). J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 2017, 35, 060603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Cao, X.A.; Syed, A.A.; Piao, H. Investigation of the electronic properties of nitrogen vacancies in AlGaN. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Coatings 11 00268 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of BMR HiEtch inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etcher.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of BMR HiEtch inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etcher.
Coatings 11 00268 g001
Coatings 11 00268 g002 550
Figure 2. DC self-bias under varying bias powers at the (a) O2 and (b) BCl3 plasma steps, and under varying ICP powers at the (c) O2 and (d) BCl3 plasma steps.
Figure 2. DC self-bias under varying bias powers at the (a) O2 and (b) BCl3 plasma steps, and under varying ICP powers at the (c) O2 and (d) BCl3 plasma steps.
Coatings 11 00268 g002
Coatings 11 00268 g003 550
Figure 3. Etch rate per cycle of the atomic layer etching (ALE) for (a) varying O2 and fixed BCl3 plasma times per cycle and (b) varying BCl3 and fixed O2 plasma times.
Figure 3. Etch rate per cycle of the atomic layer etching (ALE) for (a) varying O2 and fixed BCl3 plasma times per cycle and (b) varying BCl3 and fixed O2 plasma times.
Coatings 11 00268 g003
Coatings 11 00268 g004 550
Figure 4. Etch rate when using BCl3 plasma under a fixed ICP power of 400 W and varying bias powers.
Figure 4. Etch rate when using BCl3 plasma under a fixed ICP power of 400 W and varying bias powers.
Coatings 11 00268 g004
Coatings 11 00268 g005 550
Figure 5. Etch depth versus number of etching cycles.
Figure 5. Etch depth versus number of etching cycles.
Coatings 11 00268 g005
Coatings 11 00268 g006 550
Figure 6. Etch rate per cycle of the digital etching performed under (a) varying O2 plasma times and fixed HCl dipping time and (b) varying HCl dipping times and fixed O2 plasma time.
Figure 6. Etch rate per cycle of the digital etching performed under (a) varying O2 plasma times and fixed HCl dipping time and (b) varying HCl dipping times and fixed O2 plasma time.
Coatings 11 00268 g006
Coatings 11 00268 g007 550
Figure 7. Cross-section of the Schottky diodes fabricated on n-GaN.
Figure 7. Cross-section of the Schottky diodes fabricated on n-GaN.
Coatings 11 00268 g007
Coatings 11 00268 g008 550
Figure 8. I–V curves of the fabricated Schottky diodes. (a) Forward I–V characteristics (linear scale), (b) forward I–V characteristics (log scale), (c) reverse I–V characteristics (log scale), and (d) ideality factors.
Figure 8. I–V curves of the fabricated Schottky diodes. (a) Forward I–V characteristics (linear scale), (b) forward I–V characteristics (log scale), (c) reverse I–V characteristics (log scale), and (d) ideality factors.
Coatings 11 00268 g008
Coatings 11 00268 g009 550
Figure 9. Photoluminescence (PL) characteristics for the etched GaN.
Figure 9. Photoluminescence (PL) characteristics for the etched GaN.
Coatings 11 00268 g009
Coatings 11 00268 g010 550
Figure 10. XPS fitting results of the Al 2p, Ga 3d, and N 1s peaks for the AlGaN samples fabricated using the digital etching (a–c) and ALE (d–f) processes.
Figure 10. XPS fitting results of the Al 2p, Ga 3d, and N 1s peaks for the AlGaN samples fabricated using the digital etching (a–c) and ALE (d–f) processes.
Coatings 11 00268 g010
Coatings 11 00268 g011 550
Figure 11. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of the surfaces etched using (a) ALE and (b) digital etching and (c) the as-grown surface before etching.
Figure 11. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of the surfaces etched using (a) ALE and (b) digital etching and (c) the as-grown surface before etching.
Coatings 11 00268 g011
Table
Table 1. Optimized ALE process conditions.
Table 1. Optimized ALE process conditions.
ParameterO2 Plasma StepBCl3 Plasma Step
ICP power (W)400400
Bias power (W)32
DC self-bias (V)43.8
Chamber pressure (mTorr)5010
Gas flow rate (sccm)5010
Plasma time (s)6045
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hwang, I.-H.; Cha, H.-Y.; Seo, K.-S. Low-Damage and Self-Limiting (Al)GaN Etching Process through Atomic Layer Etching Using O2 and BCl3 Plasma. Coatings 2021, 11, 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030268

AMA Style

Hwang I-H, Cha H-Y, Seo K-S. Low-Damage and Self-Limiting (Al)GaN Etching Process through Atomic Layer Etching Using O2 and BCl3 Plasma. Coatings. 2021; 11(3):268. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030268

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hwang, Il-Hwan, Ho-Young Cha, and Kwang-Seok Seo. 2021. "Low-Damage and Self-Limiting (Al)GaN Etching Process through Atomic Layer Etching Using O2 and BCl3 Plasma" Coatings 11, no. 3: 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030268

APA Style

Hwang, I. -H., Cha, H. -Y., & Seo, K. -S. (2021). Low-Damage and Self-Limiting (Al)GaN Etching Process through Atomic Layer Etching Using O2 and BCl3 Plasma. Coatings, 11(3), 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030268

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop