Next Article in Journal
The Interface Characterization of 2-Mercapto-1-methylimidazole Corrosion Inhibitor on Brass
Next Article in Special Issue
Low-Density Insulation Blocks and Hardboards from Amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus) Stems, a New Perspective for Building Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Wear and Corrosion Resistance of Stellite 6 Laser Surfaced Alloyed (LSA) with Rhenium
Previous Article in Special Issue
Contribution of Different Pretreatments to the Thermal Stability and UV Resistance Performance of Cellulose Nanofiber Films
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Developments in Chemical Treatments, Manufacturing Techniques and Potential Applications of Natural-Fibers-Based Biodegradable Composites

1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Management & Technology, Lahore 51040, Pakistan
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mirpur University of Science and Technology (MUST), New Mirpur City, Azad Jammu and Kashmir 10250, Pakistan
4
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
5
Division of Sustainable Development, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha 0000, Qatar
6
Ingenium Research Group, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2021, 11(3), 293; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030293
Submission received: 2 February 2021 / Revised: 25 February 2021 / Accepted: 26 February 2021 / Published: 4 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Fiber Based Composites)

Abstract

:
The utilization of synthetic materials stimulates environmental concerns, and researchers worldwide are effectively reacting to environmental concerns by transitioning towards biodegradable and sustainable materials. Natural fibers like jute and sisal have been being utilized for ages in several applications, such as ropes, building materials, particle boards, etc. The absence of essential information in preparing the natural-fiber-reinforced materials is still a challenge for future applications. Chemical treatments and surface modifications can improve the quality of the natural fibers. Natural-fiber-based composites are a potential candidate for many lightweight engineering applications with significant mechanical properties. In the view of the progressive literature reported in the field, this work aims to present the significance of natural fibers, their composites, and the main factors influencing these materials for various applications (automotive industry, for instance). Secondly, we aim to address different surface modifications and chemical treatments on natural fibers and finally provide an overview of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites’ potential applications.

1. Introduction

The utilization of synthetic materials (Kevlar, carbon, and aramid fibers) stimulates environmental concerns. The production of composites reinforced with these synthetic fibers is costly [1]. Researchers around the globe are effectively reacting to environmental concerns and now shifting towards biodegradable and sustainable materials. The natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites (NFRPCs) are becoming a prime choice in several industrial applications [2,3]. For instance, considering the automotive sector, the overall car production rate is expanding every year. Restricted oil assets will elevate the oil-based items’ costs soon [4]. It is assessed that a 25% decrease in vehicle weight would be equal to sparing 250 million barrels of unrefined petroleum. Utilizing the NFRPCs could prompt a weight decrease of 10–30%; thus, it is conceivable that producers will consider extending the utilization of NFRPCs in their new products [5]. Natural fibers are seen in many applications, like in constructing sewage-system septic pipes, which triggering their use in many recyclable products [6]. The utilization of these natural fibers in the car business is now practiced. It can be seen in vehicles’ interior, for example, seatbacks, bumpers, dashboards, truck liners, main events, decking, railing, windows, and casings.
Another crucial factor is the massive manufacturing of plastic which rapidly turns into waste and becomes an issue to the climate after its application. From 1950 to 2014, global plastic production has expanded from 1.7 million tons to more than 300 million tons. Plastics use around 8% of globally produced oil in their design as crude material and energy for their production. It was discovered that 95% of these synthetic plastic materials were situated on the seashore, seabed, and top of the ocean [7]. The fabrication of an enormous amount of synthetic-fiber-reinforced materials, such as glass/carbon-fiber polymer composites, is a severe threat to our environment, as reusing glass-fiber-reinforced composites is not straightforward [8]. Furthermore, the synthetic fiber-reinforced composite poses an estimated cost of for glass US$1200–$1800/ton for glass and 30 GJ/ton energy to create, and for carbon, it is US$12,500/ton and 130 GJ/ton energy to deliver, whereas NFRPCs have a lower cost of US$200–$1000/ton and 4 GJ/ton energy to produce [9,10].
Two major challenges are hindering the vast utilization of NFRPCs. The first one is the inferior mechanical properties, compared to synthetic fiber composites [11], which usually is a consequence of the inconsistency between the fiber and the matrix [12]. The fibers’ wettability is significantly lower than synthetic fibers (like glass fiber) [13]. Lower wettability is still a challenge for their extensive use in industries [14], even though the strength of these natural fibers is comparable to synthetic fibers [15,16]. The water-absorbing capacity is another factor restricting the enormous use of NFRPCs [17,18]. This behavior hinders the utilization of NFRPCs, since their mechanical properties decline in wet conditions. The opportunities to implement these new materials in open-air applications need to be considered, especially in damp climates [19], as these fibers retain water from the air and on direct contact with the earth, resulting in voids creation within the material [20,21]. Another factor is the exceptionally polar surface of natural fibers; this actuates an interfacial dissimilarity with non-polar polymers like polypropylene and polyethylene [22,23]. Briefly, natural fibers possess inferior hydrophilicity, as well as surface and mechanical properties, and have a porous structure, restricting their use in commercial applications [24].
Besides the full replacement of synthetic fibers as reinforcement to polymers, researchers widely use another technique to reinforce the polymers with a combination of natural and synthetic fibers, limiting the use of synthetic fibers. This technique is often termed hybridization. Khalid et al. [25] studied the effect of hybridization of jute and carbon fibers. Results revealed that the jute/carbon-reinforced composites provide sufficient tensile strength compared to merely carbon-fiber-reinforced composites, broadening the scope to use hybridized fiber-reinforced composites for various applications [26].
A vast majority of the research data published in recent years on natural fiber composites provide limited information on the classification of natural fibers [27], the effect of chemical treatments, and their applications [28,29,30]. Thus, comprehensive work is needed for the recent accomplishments in this field. This work aims to present the significance of natural fibers, their composites, and the main factors influencing these materials’ choices for various applications (automotive industry, for instance). Secondly, this work aims to address different surface modifications and chemical treatments on natural fibers and finally provide an overview of potential applications of NFRPCs.

2. Composition and Mechanical Properties of Natural Fibers

The polymers containing natural fibers as reinforcement are called green composites or natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites (NFRPCs) [31,32]. Green composites provide several benefits over synthetic-strands/fibers-based composites [9], for example, ease of availability, cost adequacy, modulus, biodegradability, sustainability, and handling simplicity [33,34,35]. The research interest in natural fibers is developing due to their potential use in modern applications [36]. They are sustainable, cheaper, totally/partially recyclable, and biodegradable [37,38,39]. The natural fibers can be extracted from several sources, including animals, plants, and minerals [40]. The NFRPCs are also globally accepted sustainable materials [41]. Their brief classification, according to their source, is illustrated in Figure 1. Natural fibers are abundantly available in the South Asian region, specifically Pakistan, India, and Sri Lanka. Among all the natural fibers, jute, bamboo, coir, sisal, and hemp are most commonly reported in the literature.
The fibers obtained from plant stems reveal better mechanical properties and yield strength as they contain higher cellulose content [42]. Cellulose content characterizes the strength and firmness of fiber [43], owing to the number of hydrogen bonds and different linkages that exist in the cellulose [44,45]. Generally, fibers’ mechanical properties are highly dependent on the production process, chemical processing, and final composite manufacturing techniques [46]. Pretty much all the fibers, barring cotton, are predominantly made out of cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin, waxes, and a few water-solvent compounds [47,48,49]. Table 1 reports the most significant mechanical properties and composition of the most common natural fibers.
Coir fiber is an important class of natural fibers with attractive mechanical properties [22]. Coir fiber is cheap and widely utilized in several applications. Coir fibers are obtained from coconut trees, which are found in tropical regions. Moreover, the coir contains flexible lignocellulosic fibers with up to 42% cellulose content, 0.2% hemicellulose content, and 40–45% lignin content [50].
Jute fiber has a high perspective as it reveals high strength to weight proportion and excellent impact strength [51]. The largest producers of jute are India, China, and Bangladesh. Jute fiber reinforced polymer composites has many reported applications, e.g., for windows, furniture, I-shaped beam, skateboards, underground channel drains, water pipes, floor tiles, etc. [52].
However, bamboo fibers exist abundantly in Asia and South America but have not been investigated entirely to their potential, even though they are considered characteristic engineering material [53]. Generally, bamboo has been utilized in living spaces, offices, and instruments, owing to its high strength to its weight due to the longitudinal arrangement of fibers. The bamboo fibers generally have better mechanical properties yet are weak compared to other natural fibers because of the additional lignin content covering the bamboo strands. Furthermore, bamboo fiber has higher elasticity than most natural fibers, such as jute [54] and sisal [53].
Hemp has been cultivated annually in Central Asia for the last 12,000 years and reveals extraordinary tensile strength and modulus, making it useful for reinforcement in composite materials [55,56]. The applications of hemp fibers are in geotextiles, furniture, and manufacturing pipes [57].
Like other natural fibers, kenaf can replace wood, which is gathered once in 20–25 years, while the kenaf plant is collected two or three times a year. kenaf plants can grow 3–4 m high within four to five months and consists of three layers; bast, pith, and core [10,58]. The kenaf plant consists of 33% of the bast, and the remaining part accounts for pith and core. Kenaf bast fiber has been determined for to have predominant mechanical properties than other fibers [59,60].
Banana fiber, at present, is a byproduct of banana development [61]. Subsequently, banana fiber can be utilized for several applications [62]. Banana fiber is found to be a reasonable reinforcement to polyester tar. The properties of the composites are unequivocally impacted by the fiber length [63].
Likewise, sisal is one of the natural fibers which is abundantly available, and its synthesis is mostly in a regularly developed wasteland, which helps in soil protection [71]. Tanzania and Brazil are the largest producers of sisal in the world [72]. The use of sisal fibers has been seen in many applications like in railway industries as the gear case, main doors, luggage racks, berths, interior panels and partitions, and modular toilets [73,74].
Figure 2 presents the comparison between the unit price of the most widely used natural fibers. The unit cost of natural fibers is significantly lower than synthetic fibers like glass and carbon [75]. Henceforth, taking the mechanical properties, price, and environmental impact into account, flax [76,77], hemp [78], and jute [2] fibers can be considered as potential reinforcement to polymers [79].

3. Different Treatments for Natural Fibers

3.1. Physical Treatments

It is essential to understand the properties of the cell wall segments and their dependencies on fiber properties, to acknowledge how lignocellulosic fiber can be utilized in high-performance industrial applications [80,81,82]. Natural fibers mostly lag in the hydrophilic property, causing poor chemical resistance, inferior mechanical properties, and porous structure, which limit their engineering applications [83,84]. Hydrophilicity also reduces the applicability of textile products, especially in transport and packaging [85]. Another significant factor in NFRPCs production that virtually affects their properties and interfacial behavior is the different treatments. Many physical treatments [30] are performed on natural fibers, prior to chemical treatments [86]. These treatments [87] include Corona Discharge, Plasma Treatment, Ultraviolet (UV) Treatment, Fiber Beating, and Heat Treatment.
Corona treatment is possibly the most intriguing strategy for surface oxidation actuation. This treatment changes the cellulose strands’ surface energy and is responsible for the improved compatibility between the hydrophilic matrix and fibers [88].
Plasma treatment has been effectively used to eliminate the pollutions/dust particles on the fibers, thus providing an improved fibers’ surface. The gas type, pressing factor, and concentration need to be controlled precisely, for effective processing [87].
UV is a generally new approach, acknowledged for eliminating dust particles from the plant fiber surface. In UV treatment, some factors (e.g., stream, gas type, etc.) are uncontrolled [83,89]. During the treatment, the strands are set in a chamber for the surface oxidation of fibers. Besides, the UV treatment builds the polarity on the fiber surface, which prompts better wettability of the fibers, leading to the higher strength of the NFRPCs [87,88].

3.2. Chemical Treatments

Chemical treatments have a considerable effect on NFRPC’s mechanical properties [90,91,92], owing to hydroxyl groups from cellulose and lignin [93]. Chemical-treatment strategies commonly rely on reagent functional groups/active groups capable of responding superiorly with natural-fiber structures, just as adequately removing non-cellulosic materials from the fibers [94]. Besides, hydroxyl groups resulting from chemical treatments might be engaged with the hydrogen bonding inside the cellulose atoms, limiting the movement towards the matrix [6,90]. Thus, chemical modifications enact these groups or present new moieties that can viably interlock with the matrix, resulting in good bonding [95,96].
The poisonous and reactive synthetic chemicals are sometimes added to the composite to stop an organic attack [97], which is the basis for the wood-preservation industry [11]. Many surface treatments, for example, alkali, acetylation, silane, and peroxide treatments, have been conducted to improve fiber properties. Different chemical treatments and their particular significance on various natural fibers are reported in Table 2. Table 3 presents optimum concentrations of the solution in different chemical treatment procedures.

3.2.1. Alkali Treatment

Among different methods/techniques, alkali treatment is considered to be cost-effective and most efficient strategy, resulting in changes in the fiber surface, just as removing amorphous hemicelluloses and lignin [94]. Alkali treatment is a typical method to clean and adjust the fiber surface to lower surface strain and improve the interfacial attachment between natural fiber and a polymer matrix [115].
To this end, a few endeavors have been made to create effective natural fibers for reinforcement. A past report showed that the cellulosic fibers removed from leaves of the Saharan aloe vera cactus plant utilizing an antacid treatment could potentially be used as strengthening material [83].

3.2.2. Silane Treatment

Silanes are productive coupling specialists widely used in fiber-reinforced composites and have an equivalent effect on synthetic-fiber-reinforced composite. Silanes also have the potential to act as an adhesion promoter in numerous glue formulations or utilized as substrate primers, providing strong adhesion. Various studies indicated that a layer was formulated on the fiber surface by silane adsorption. The surface morphology of sisal fibers changed by developing compound connections between the silane and the sisal fiber surface. Therefore, they are now extensively used in many studies [116]. Different steps involved in the silane treatment process are as follows [116]:
  • Hydrolysis,
  • Self-condensation,
  • Adsorption,
  • Chemical grafting.

3.2.3. Acetylation Treatment

The acetylation treatment reduces plant fibers’ hydrophilicity and improves the fibers and matrix’s interfacial bonding. It works on acetyl groups (CH3CO), which removes the hydrophilic hydroxyl gatherings (OH) of the fiber. Accordingly, the fiber’s hydrophilic nature diminishes and improves the composites’ dimensional stability [36]. This treatment also results in a rough surface topology with fewer void substances, thus providing better mechanical interlocking with the matrix. Senthilraja et al. [113] reported that the mechanical properties of NFRPCs could be improved through acetylation treatment. These NFRPCs were utilized later for applications like entryway boards, vehicle parts, etc. Acetylation treatment reduces the dampness retention furthermore, it improves their life [117].

3.2.4. Benzoylation Treatment

Benzoylation produces a significant change in the natural blend [43]. Benzoyl chloride is regularly utilized in fiber treatment. Benzoyl chloride incorporates benzoyl (C6H5C=O), ascribed to the treated fiber’s diminished hydrophilic nature and improved epoxy adhesion [20]. Kalia et al. [118] explained benzoylation treatment on the sisal fibers through a chemical reaction described in Figure 3. Results revealed that the outside surface of sisal strands got coarse, contrary to the sisal fibers’ clear and smooth texture.

3.2.5. Maleated Coupling Agents

The maleated coupling technique is commonly used to strengthen the composites containing fillers and fiber. The setup function of this technique results from two principal factors, cost-effective production and the practical interaction of maleic anhydride with the fibers. Coupling specialists, for example, Polypropylene (PP) joined with maleic anhydride (PP-MAH) and PP united with acrylic corrosive (PP-AA), are generally utilized to improve interfacial properties [119]. Esterification response and H-bond collaborations may occur at the cellulosic filler interface, the PP-MAH, proposed in the current writing and portrayed in Figure 4.
Other minor medications, for example, potassium permanganate [120,121], and acrylic acid can also be utilized. The effects of different treatments on a single flax fiber are presented in Figure 5. For example Figure 5a,b shows the comparison of silane treatment on the flax fiber surface. This treatment improves the good adhesion of flax fiber with matrix, resulting in less pull out of fibers from matrix surfaces [122]. Furthermore, it improves the flexibility of flax fiber. Figure 5c,d presents the effect of stearic acid treatment on the flax fiber surface. This technique removes the non-crystalline constituents of the fiber structure. Consequently, the strands are scattered better in the matrix by separating the fiber groups with more fibrillation [123].

3.3. Effect of Treatments on Mechanical Properties of Composites

Table 4 reports the effect of different treatments on mechanical properties of natural fiber-reinforced (specifically sisal fiber) composites.

4. Synthesis of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites

NFRPCs composites are fabricated by different manufacturing techniques [87]. These manufacturing techniques include; automated fiber placement, extrusion, compression molding, Resin Transfer Molding (RTM), long fiber thermoplastic-direct (LFT-D) method, sheet molding compound (SMC), pultrusion, and Thermoset Compression Molding. These techniques have been evolved progressively and used by many researchers, revealing the potential of these techniques in composites manufacturing with good quality [74].
Innovative advancements and process solutions should focus on achieving high-quality NFRPCs identified with their new application zones [65]. However, sometimes the following factors affect the manufacturing process:
  • Moisture;
  • Constituents like cellulose and lignin in natural fiber;
  • Final composite structure.
In any case, new downstream and supplementary equipment have been planned. Single or double venting frameworks, for example, are mostly used for heating for in-line drying, high-power splash cooling tanks [126]. An assortment of new feeding systems’ arrangements through any gravimetric or vertical crammer, blends the expulsion infusion shaping expulsion pressure forming just as screw, bite the dust, and shape plan [88]. Most of the NFRPCs fabricated to date by these procedures are presented in Figure 6. The manufacturers aim to improve the possibility of utilizing these techniques [64,127].

5. Potential Scope/Application of Natural of Fibers Reinforced Composites

The interest in the use of NFRPCs is developing rapidly in various engineering fields [128]. Figure 7 illustrates the applications of NFRPCs in different industrial areas. Natural fibers, like kenaf, hemp, flax, jute, and sisal, are providing several benefits, such as decreases in weight, cost, and CO2 footprints; less dependence on oil resources; and recyclability [16,31,129]. Therefore, vehicle manufacturers have been keen on utilizing naturals fiber composites both inside and outside of automobiles. For example, the various types of characteristic NFRPCs have gained incredible attention across multiple car applications and by numerous car manufacturers, for example, German auto organizations (BMW, Audi Group, Ford, Opel, Volkswagen, Daimler Chrysler, and Mercedes), Proton organization (Malaysian national carmaker), and Cambridge industry (a car industry in the USA) [48,68]. The use of NFRPCs serves multiple objectives to these organizations: to bring down the vehicle’s overall load along these lines expanding eco-friendliness, and build the supportability of their assembling procedure [130].
Adjacent to the car business, the use of NFRPCs can be seen in the building and development industry, sports, aviation, and others, for instance, boards, window outline, decking, and bike outline frame [77,131]. The specific applications of different natural fibers in industrial products are discussed in Table 5.

6. Conclusions and Future Perspective

Alarming atmospheric conditions, environmental concerns, and the need for innovation have motivated many researchers to create novel materials. Researchers around the globe are effectively reacting to environmental concerns and now shifting towards biodegradable and sustainable materials. Subsequently, the natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites (NFRPCs) are becoming a prime choice in several industrial applications. In view of growing interest in NFRPCs, this review aimed to present up-to-date knowledge about different natural fibers, the manufacturing and chemical treatments of natural fibers, and their applications in various fields. Chemical treatments were also highlighted in detail for getting better surface attributes, which permits us to lessen the hydrophilic capacity and improve the adhesion between the fibers and polymers [118]. Natural fibers’ choice depends upon their availability, weight/cost, and mechanical properties [137]. The mechanical properties of NFRPCs are primarily affected by the adhesion property of the fibers. This property can be improved by pretreating the fibers. Alkali treatment can be utilized, as it is reported as the most effective technique for all NFRPCs. A combination of other treatments like (alkali + silane) can also be used. The higher concentration of chemicals and the longer soaking time of fibers result in significant mechanical properties improvement. It can be concluded that the development of NFRPCs is rapidly expanding and is visualized as potential future material for several applications [131].
Interfacial adhesion of natural fibers with matrix remains the critical issue in overall performance [99]. Among every chemical treatment studied, alkali treatment is a simple, traditional, and effective procedure for treating many fibers, which can be done on almost all-natural fibers to improve interfacial adhesion [138,139]. Biodegradation phenomena or potential ignition for NFRPCs is moderately new. Therefore, the research should also focus on evaluating the decomposition behavior of NFRPCs. It is necessary to get trustworthy information on the level of biodegradation and the total time for deterioration.
In the future, these NFRPCs will probably achieve complete biodegradability and comparable mechanical properties to those of synthetic-fibers-reinforced composites. Future improvement areas in NFRPCs composites are; mass production of NFRPCs, and thinking about their uses and popularity in the large-scale market are likely to be the primary goals of many researchers. Moreover, the consolidation of nano-cellulose (potentially nanoclay) into NFRPC, can enhance different useful properties, and finally, the examination of the tribological properties of NFRPCs should be one of the prime areas of interest in future research-based studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.R.; methodology, Z.U.A., M.Y.K., and N.A.; software, H.A. and Z.U.A.; formal analysis, M.Y.K., H.A., and N.A.; investigation, M.Y.K., A.A.R., Z.U.A., and H.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Y.K.; writing—review and editing, A.A.R., M.Y.K., R.I., and H.A.; supervision, F.P.G.M.; project administration, F.P.G.M.; funding acquisition, F.P.G.M. and R.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work reported herewith has been financially by the Dirección General de Universidades, Investigación e Innovación of Castilla-La Mancha, under Research Grant ProSeaWind project (Ref.: SBPLY/19/180501/000102).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Badie, M.A.; Mahdi, E.; Hamouda, A.M.S. An investigation into hybrid carbon/glass fiber reinforced epoxy composite automotive drive shaft. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 1485–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Khalid, M.; Al Rashid, A.; Sheikh, M. Correction to: Effect of anodizing process on inter laminar shear strength of GLARE composite through T-peel test: Experimental and numerical approach. Exp. Tech. 2021, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Biagiotti, J.; Puglia, D.; Kenny, J.M. A Review on Natural Fibre-Based Composites—Part II. J. Nat. Fibers 2004, 1, 37–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Al Rashid, A.; Imran, R.; Khalid, M.Y. Determination of opening stresses for railway steel under low cycle fatigue using digital image correlation. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2020, 108, 102601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Davoodi, M.M.; Sapuan, S.M.; Ahmad, D.; Ali, A.; Khalina, A.; Jonoobi, M. Mechanical properties of hybrid kenaf/glass reinforced epoxy composite for passenger car bumper beam. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 4927–4932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Singha, S.; Rana, R.K. Functionalization of cellulosic fibers by graft copolymerization of acrylonitrile and ethyl acrylate from their binary mixtures. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 500–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zie, F.W.W.; Debnath, S.; Anwar, M.; Abdullah, A.H. Enhancing mechanical performance of bagasse fiber-epoxy composite by surface treatment. Solid State Phenom. 2020, 305, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zahid, S.; Nasir, M.A.; Nauman, S.; Karahan, M.; Nawab, Y.; Ali, H.M.; Khalid, Y.; Nabeel, M.; Ullah, M. Experimental analysis of ILSS of glass fibre reinforced thermoplastic and thermoset textile composites enhanced with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2019, 33, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shalwan, A.; Yousif, B. In state of art: Mechanical and tribological behaviour of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. Mater. Des. 2013, 48, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yousif, F.; Shalwan, A.; Chin, C.W.; Ming, K.C. Flexural properties of treated and untreated kenaf/epoxy composites. Mater. Des. 2012, 40, 378–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gon, K.; Das, P.; Maity, S. Jute Composites as Wood Substitute. Int. J. Text. Sci. 2013, 1, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Parre, B.; Karthikeyan, A.B.; Udhayasankar, R. Investigation of chemical, thermal and morphological properties of untreated and NaOH treated banana fiber. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 22, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Valadez-Gonzalez, A.; Cervantes-Uc, J.; Olayo, R.; Herrera-Franco, P. Effect of fiber surface treatment on the fiber–matrix bond strength of natural fiber reinforced composites. Compos. Part. B Eng. 1999, 30, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sanjay, M.R.; Siengchin, S.; Parameswaranpillai, J.; Jawaid, M.; Pruncu, C.I.; Khan, A.A. comprehensive review of techniques for natural fibers as reinforcement in composites: Preparation, processing and characterization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mohanty, A.; Wibowo, M.; Misra, M.; Drzal, L. Effect of process engineering on the performance of natural fiber reinforced cellulose acetate biocomposites. Compos. Part. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2004, 35, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Siakeng, R.; Jawaid, M.; Ariffin, H.; Sapuan, S.M.; Asim, M.; Saba, N. Natural fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites: A review. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 446–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Venkateshwaran, N.; ElayaPerumal, A.; Alavudeen, A.; Thiruchitrambalam, M. Mechanical and water absorption behaviour of banana/sisal reinforced hybrid composites. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 4017–4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Saheb, D.N.; Jog, J.P. Natural fiber polymer composites: A review. Adv. Polym. Technol. 1999, 18, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Assarar, M.; Scida, D.; el Mahi, A.; Poilâne, C.; Ayad, R. Influence of water ageing on mechanical properties and damage events of two reinforced composite materials: Flax-fibres and glass-fibres. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 788–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, X.; Tabil, L.G.; Panigrahi, S. Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: A review. J. Polym. Environ. 2007, 15, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jena, P.K.; Mohanty, J.R.; Nayak, S. Effect of Surface Modification of Vetiver Fibers on Their Physical and Thermal Properties. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Arrakhiz, F.Z.; Elachaby, M.; Bouhfid, R.; Vaudreuil, S.; Essassi, M.; Qaiss, A. Mechanical and thermal properties of polypropylene reinforced with Alfa fiber under different chemical treatment. Mater. Des. 2012, 35, 318–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Arrakhiz, F.; El Achaby, M.; Malha, M.; Bensalah, M.; Fassi-Fehri, O.; Bouhfid, R.; Benmoussa, K.; Qaiss, A. Mechanical and thermal properties of natural fibers reinforced polymer composites: Doum/low density polyethylene. Mater. Des. 2013, 43, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arib, R.M.N.; Sapuan, S.M.; Ahmad, M.M.H.M.; Paridah, M.T.; Zaman, H.M.D.K. Mechanical properties of pineapple leaf fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. Mater. Des. 2006, 27, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Khalid, M.Y.; Nasir, M.A.; Ali, A.; Al Rashid, A.; Khan, M.R. Experimental and numerical characterization of tensile property of jute/carbon fabric reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Jeyapragash, R.; Srinivasan, V.; Sathiyamurthy, S. Mechanical properties of natural fiber/particulate reinforced epoxy composites—A review of the literature. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 22, 1223–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sobczak, L.; Lang, R.W.; Haider, A. Polypropylene composites with natural fibers and wood—General mechanical property profiles. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2012, 72, 550–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Prasad, V.; Joy, A.; Venkatachalam, G.; Narayanan, S.; Rajakumar, S. Finite Element Analysis of Jute and Banana Fibre Reinforced Hybrid Polymer Matrix Composite and Optimization of Design Parameters Using ANOVA Technique. Proc. Eng. 2014, 97, 1116–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Li, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, X. Flexural characteristics of coir fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Fibers Polym. 2006, 7, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ghani, M.A.A.; Salleh, Z.; Hyie, K.M.; Berhan, M.N.; Taib, Y.M.D.; Bakri, M.A.I. Mechanical properties of kenaf/fiberglass polyester hybrid composite. Proc. Eng. 2012, 41, 1654–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Parikh, D.; Calamari, T.; Sawhney, A.; Blanchard, E.; Screen, F.; Myatt, J.; Stryjewski, D.; Muller, D. Thermoformable Automotive Composites Containing Kenaf and Other Cellulosic Fibers. Text. Res. J. 2002, 72, 668–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jamshaid, H.; Mishra, R. A green material from rock: Basalt fiber—A review. J. Text. Inst. 2016, 107, 923–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dawit, J.B.; Regassa, Y.; Lemu, H.G. Property characterization of acacia tortilis for natural fiber reinforced polymer composite. Results Mater. 2020, 5, 100054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Khan, Z.; Yousif, B.F.; Islam, M. Fracture behaviour of bamboo fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Compos. Part. B Eng. 2017, 116, 186–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rahman, N.; Shing, L.W.; Simon, L.; Philipp, M.; Alireza, J.; Hebel, D.E.; Ling, C.S.; Wuan, L.H.; Valavan, S.; Nee, S.S. Enhanced bamboo composite with protective coating for structural concrete application. Energy Proc. 2017, 143, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tavares, T.D.; Antunes, J.C.; Ferreira, F.; Felgueiras, H.P. Biofunctionalization of natural fiber-reinforced biocomposites for biomedical applications. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Reddy, M.; Reddy, Y.V.M.; Reddy, B.C.M.; Reddy, R.M. Mechanical, morphological, and thermogravimetric analysis of alkali-treated Cordia-Dichotoma natural fiber composites. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 17, 759–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kumar, S.S. Dataset on mechanical properties of natural fiber reinforced polyester composites for engineering applications. Data Br. 2020, 28, 105054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Alsaeed, T.; Yousif, B.F.; Ku, H. The potential of using date palm fibres as reinforcement for polymeric composites. Mater. Des. 2013, 43, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sumesh, K.R.; Kanthavel, K.; Kavimani, V. Peanut oil cake-derived cellulose fiber: Extraction, application of mechanical and thermal properties in pineapple/flax natural fiber composites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 150, 775–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ljungberg, L.Y. Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products. Mater. Des. 2007, 28, 466–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Silva, G.; Kim, S.; Aguilar, R.; Nakamatsu, J. Natural fibers as reinforcement additives for geopolymers—A review of potential eco-friendly applications to the construction industry. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2020, 23, e00132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kumar, A.; Sharma, K.; Dixit, A.R. A review of the mechanical and thermal properties of graphene and its hybrid polymer nanocomposites for structural applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 5992–6026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rokbi, M.; Osmani, H.; Imad, A.; Benseddiq, N. Effect of chemical treatment on flexure properties of natural fiber-reinforced polyester composite. Proc. Eng. 2011, 10, 2092–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Reddy, N.; Yang, Y. Properties and potential applications of natural cellulose fibers from the bark of cotton stalks. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 3563–3569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shrivastava, R.; Christy, A.; Telang, A.; Rana, R.S. Effect of Chemical Treatment and Curing Parameters on Mechanical Properties of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites-A Review. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2015, 5, 70–75. [Google Scholar]
  47. Parikh, V.; Chen, Y.; Sun, L. Reducing Automotive Interior Noise with Natural Fiber Nonwoven Floor Covering Systems. Text. Res. J. 2006, 76, 813–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Saxena, M.; Pappu, A.; Haque, R.; Sharma, A. Cellulose Fibers: Bio- and Nano-Polymer Composites; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  49. He, J.; He, L.; Yang, B. Analysis on the impact response of fiber-reinforced composite laminates: An emphasis on the FEM simulation. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2019, 26, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ramamoorthy, S.K.; Skrifvars, M.; Persson, A. A review of natural fibers used in biocomposites: Plant, animal and regenerated cellulose fibers. Polym. Rev. 2015, 55, 107–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ali, A.; Nasir, M.A.; Khalid, M.Y.; Nauman, S.; Shaker, K.; Khushnood, S.; Altaf, K.; Zeeshan, M.; Hussain, A. Experimental and numerical characterization of mechanical properties of carbon/jute fabric reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2019, 33, 4217–4226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chandekar, H.; Chaudhari, V.; Waigaonkar, S. A review of jute fiber reinforced polymer composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 26, 2079–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Khalil, H.P.S.A.; Bhat, I.U.H.; Jawaid, M.; Zaidon, A.; Hermawan, D.; Hadi, Y.S. Bamboo fibre reinforced biocomposites: A review. Mater. Des. 2012, 42, 353–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Khalid, M.Y.; Al Rashid, A.; Arif, Z.U.; Akram, N.; Arshad, H.; Márquez, F.P.G. Characterization of Failure Strain In Fiber Reinforced Composites: Under On-Axis and Off-Axis Loading. Crystals 2021, 11, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Elkhaoulani, A.; Arrakhiz, F.; Benmoussa, K.; Bouhfid, R.; Qaiss, A. Mechanical and thermal properties of polymer composite based on natural fibers: Moroccan hemp fibers/polypropylene. Mater. Des. 2013, 49, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Asim, M.; Abdan, K.; Jawaid, M.; Nasir, M.; Dashtizadeh, Z.; Ishak, M.R.; Hoque, M.E. A review on pineapple leaves fibre and its composites. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2015, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Mohammed, L.; Ansari, M.N.M.; Pua, G.; Jawaid, M.; Islam, M.S. A Review on Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite and Its Applications. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2015, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Yahaya, R.; Sapuan, S.M.; Jawaid, M.; Leman, Z.; Zainudin, E.S. Effect of layering sequence and chemical treatment on the mechanical properties of woven kenaf-aramid hybrid laminated composites. Mater. Des. 2015, 67, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. El-Shekeil, Y.A.; Sapuan, S.M.; Abdan, K.; Zainudin, E.S. Influence of fiber content on the mechanical and thermal properties of Kenaf fiber reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane composites. Mater. Des. 2012, 40, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Akil, H.M.; Omar, M.F.; Mazuki, A.A.M.; Safiee, S.; Ishak, Z.A.M.; Bakar, A.A. Kenaf fiber reinforced composites: A review. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 4107–4121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Al Rashid, A.; Khalid, M.Y.; Imran, R.; Ali, U.; Koc, M. Utilization of Banana Fiber-Reinforced Hybrid Composites in the Sports Industry. Materials 2020, 13, 3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Venkateshwaran, N.; Perumal, A.E.; Arunsundaranayagam, D. Fiber surface treatment and its effect on mechanical and visco-elastic behaviour of banana/epoxy composite. Mater. Des. 2013, 47, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sapuan, S.M.; Leenie, A.; Harimi, M.; Beng, Y.K. Mechanical properties of woven banana fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Mater. Des. 2006, 27, 689–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Balla, V.K.; Kate, K.H.; Satyavolu, J.; Singh, P.; Tadimeti, J.G.D. Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects. Compos. Part. B Eng. 2019, 174, 106956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bourmaud, A.; Beaugrand, J.; Shah, D.U.; Placet, V.; Baley, C. Towards the design of high-performance plant fibre composites. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 97, 347–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hassanzadeh, S.; Hasani, H. A review on milkweed fiber properties as a high-potential raw material in textile applications. J. Ind. Text. 2017, 46, 1412–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kumar, R.; Haq, M.I.U.; Raina, A.; Anand, A. Industrial applications of natural fibre-reinforced polymer composites–challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2019, 12, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Onuaguluchi, O.; Banthia, N. Plant-based natural fibre reinforced cement composites: A review. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2016, 68, 96–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Al-Oqla, F.M.; Sapuan, S.M. Natural fiber reinforced polymer composites in industrial applications: Feasibility of date palm fibers for sustainable automotive industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 66, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Venkateshwaran, N.; Elayaperumal, A. Banana fiber reinforced polymer composites—A review. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2010, 29, 2387–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Prasad, V.R.; Rao, K.M. Mechanical properties of natural fibre reinforced polyester composites: Jowar, sisal and bamboo. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 4658–4663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kalia, S.; Kaushik, V.K.; Sharma, R.K. Effect of benzoylation and graft copolymerization on morphology, thermal stability, and crystallinity of sisal fibers. J. Nat. Fibers 2011, 8, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kumre, A.; Rana, R.; Purohit, R. A Review on mechanical property of sisal glass fiber reinforced polymer composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2017, 4, 3466–3476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lotfi, A.; Li, H.; Dao, D.V.; Prusty, G. Natural fiber–reinforced composites: A review on material, manufacturing, and machinability. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zaini, S.; Azaman, M.D.; Jamali, M.S.; Ismail, K.A. Synthesis and characterization of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites as core for honeycomb core structure: A review. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 2020, 22, 525–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Flynn, J.; Amiri, A.; Ulven, C. Hybridized carbon and flax fiber composites for tailored performance. Mater. Des. 2016, 102, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Dahlke, B.; Larbig, H.; Scherzer, H.D.; Poltrock, R. Natural fiber reinforced foams based on renewable resources for automotive interior applications. J. Cell. Plast. 1998, 34, 361–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gulati, D.; Sain, M. Fungal-modification of natural fibers: A novel method of treating natural fibers for composite reinforcement. J. Polym. Environ. 2006, 14, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ali, A.; Shaker, K.; Nawab, Y.; Jabbar, M.; Hussain, T.; Militky, J.; Baheti, V. Hydrophobic treatment of natural fibers and their composites—A review. J. Ind. Text. 2018, 47, 2153–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Basak, M.K.; Chanda, S.; Bhaduri, S.K.; Mondal, S.B.; Nandi, R. Recycling of jute waste for edible mushroom production. Ind. Crop. Prod. 1996, 5, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Monteiro, S.N.; Lopes, F.P.D.; Ferreira, A.S.; Nascimento, D.C.O. Natural-fiber polymer-matrix composites: Cheaper, tougher, and environmentally friendly. JOM 2009, 61, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Camargo, P.H.C.; Satyanarayana, K.G.; Wypych, F. Nanocomposites: Synthesis, structure, properties and new application opportunities. Mater. Res. 2009, 12, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Sonawane, G.H.; Patil, S.P.; Sonawane, S.H. Nanocomposites and Its Applications; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  84. Meneghetti, P.; Qutubuddin, S. Synthesis, thermal properties and applications of polymer-clay nanocomposites. Thermochim. Acta 2006, 442, 74–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Vilaseca, F.; Corrales, F.; Llop, M.F.; Pèlach, M.À.; Mutjé, P. Chemical treatment for improving wettability of biofibres into thermoplastic matrices. Compos. Interfaces 2005, 12, 725–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pothan, L.A.; Thomas, S.; Groeninckx, G. The role of fibre/matrix interactions on the dynamic mechanical properties of chemically modified banana fibre/polyester composites. Compos. Part. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2006, 37, 1260–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gholampour, A.; Ozbakkaloglu, T. A Review of Natural Fiber Composites: Properties, Modification and Processing Techniques, Characterization, Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2020; Volume 55, p. 3. [Google Scholar]
  88. Faruk, O.; Bledzki, A.K.; Fink, H.-P.; Sain, M. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1552–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rahman, S.; Mathur, V.; Asmatulu, R. Effect of nanoclay and graphene inclusions on the low-velocity impact resistance of Kevlar-epoxy laminated composites. Compos. Struct. 2018, 187, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Amiandamhen, S.O.; Meincken, M.; Tyhoda, L. Natural Fibre Modification and Its Influence on Fibre-matrix Interfacial Properties in Biocomposite Materials. Fibers Polym. 2020, 21, 677–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Rippon, J.A.; Evans, D.J. Improving the Properties of Natural Fibres by Chemical Treatments; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  92. Khalid, M.Y.; Rashid, A.A.; Sheikh, M.F. Effect of anodizing process on inter laminar shear strength of GLARE composite through T-peel test: Experimental and numerical approach. Exp. Tech. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Corrales, F.; Vilaseca, F.; Llop, M.; Gironès, J.; Méndez, J.; Mutjè, P. Chemical modification of jute fibers for the production of green-composites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 144, 730–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gallego, R.; Piras, C.C.; Rutgeerts, L.A.J.; Fernandez-Prieto, S.; De Borggraeve, W.M.; Franco, J.M.; Smets, J. Green approach for the activation and functionalization of jute fibers through ball milling. Cellulose 2020, 27, 643–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Haneefa, A.; Bindu, P.; Aravind, I.; Thomas, S. Studies on tensile and flexural properties of short banana/glass hybrid fiber reinforced polystyrene composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2008, 42, 1471–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Arbelaiz, A.; Txueka, U.; Mezo, I.; Orue, A. Biocomposites Based on Poly(Lactic Acid) Matrix and Reinforced with Lignocellulosic Fibers: The Effect of Fiber Type and Matrix Modification. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Arju, S.N.; Afsar, A.M.; Das, D.K.; Khan, M.A. Role of reactive dye and chemicals on mechanical properties of jute fabrics polypropylene composites. Proc. Eng. 2014, 90, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Van Voorn, B.; Smit, H.; Sinke, R.; De Klerk, B. Natural fibre reinforced sheet moulding compound. Compos. Part. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2001, 32, 1271–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Roy, K.; Debnath, S.C.; Tzounis, L.; Pongwisuthiruchte, A.; Potiyaraj, P. Effect of various surface treatments on the performance of jute fibers filled natural rubber (NR) composites. Polymers 2020, 12, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Zhou, F.; Cheng, G.; Jiang, B. Effect of silane treatment on microstructure of sisal fibers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 292, 806–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. De Klerk, M.D.; Kayondo, M.; Moelich, G.M.; de Villiers, W.I.; Combrinck, R.; Boshoff, W.P. Durability of chemically modified sisal fibre in cement-based composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 241, 117835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Khan, M.A.; Terano, M.; Gafur, M.A.; Alam, M.S. Studies on the mechanical properties of woven jute fabric reinforced poly(L-lactic acid) composites. J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. 2016, 28, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Wang, B.; Panigrahi, S.; Tabil, L.; Crerar, W. Pre-treatment of flax fibers for use in rotationally molded biocomposites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2007, 26, 447–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Paul, A.; Joseph, K.; Thomas, S. Effect of surface treatments on the electrical properties of low-density polyethylene composites reinforced with short sisal fibers. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1997, 57, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kabir, M.M.; Wang, H.; Lau, K.T.; Cardona, F. Chemical treatments on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: An overview. Compos. Part. B Eng. 2012, 43, 2883–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ali, K.I.; Khan, M.A.; Ali, M.A. Study on Jute Material with Urethane Acrylate by UV Curing. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1997, 49, 383–388. [Google Scholar]
  107. Khattab, T.A.; Mohamed, A.L.; Hassabo, A.G. Development of durable superhydrophobic cotton fabrics coated with silicone/stearic acid using different cross-linkers. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 249, 122981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Onwulata, C.I.; Cooke, P.H.; Harden, J.; Liu, Z.; Erhan, S.Z.; Akin, D.E.; Barton, F.E. Farrell Interfacial Modification of Hemp Fiber Reinforced Composites Using Fungal and Alkali Treatment. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy 2007, 1, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sun, L.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, P.; Dong, Z. Preparation of a novel flame retardant containing triazine groups and its application on cotton fabrics. New J. Chem. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mylsamy, K.; Rajendran, I. Influence of alkali treatment and fibre length on mechanical properties of short Agave fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 4629–4640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wei, B.; Cao, H.; Song, S. Tensile behavior contrast of basalt and glass fibers after chemical treatment. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 4244–4250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Khondker, A.; Ishiaku, U.S.; Nakai, A.; Hamada, H. Tensile, flexural and impact properties of jute fibre-based thermosetting composites. Plast. Rubber Compos. 2005, 34, 450–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Senthilraja, R.; Sarala, R.; Antony, A.G. Effect of acetylation technique on mechanical behavior and durability of palm fibre vinyl-ester composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 21, 634–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Gironès, J.; Pimenta, M.T.B.; Vilaseca, F.; de Carvalho, A.J.F.; Mutjé, P.; Curvelo, A.A.S. Blocked isocyanates as coupling agents for cellulose-based composites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2007, 68, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Bachtiar, D.; Sapuan, S.; Hamdan, M. The effect of alkaline treatment on tensile properties of sugar palm fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Mater. Des. 2008, 29, 1285–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Vijay, R.; Manoharan, S.; Arjun, S.; Vinod, A.; Singaravelu, D.L. Characterization of Silane-Treated and Untreated Natural Fibers from Stem of Leucas Aspera. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Bledzki, A.; Gassan, J. Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1999, 24, 221–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kaushik, V.K.; Kumar, A.; Kalia, S. Effect of Mercerization and Benzoyl Peroxide Treatment on Morphology, Thermal Stability and Crystallinity of Sisal Fibers. Int. J. Text. Sci. 2013, 1, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Keener, T.J.; Stuart, R.K.; Brown, T.K. Maleated coupling agents for natural fibre composites. Compos. Part. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2004, 35, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Madhu, P.; Sanjay, M.R.; Jawaid, M.; Siengchin, S.; Khan, A.; Pruncu, C.I. A new study on effect of various chemical treatments on Agave Americana fiber for composite reinforcement: Physico-chemical, thermal, mechanical and morphological properties. Polym. Test. 2020, 85, 106437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Knežević, M.; Kramar, A.; Hajnrih, T.; Korica, M.; Nikolić, T.; Žekić, A.; Kostić, M. Influence of Potassium Permanganate Oxidation on Structure and Properties of Cotton. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Georgiopoulos, P.; Kontou, E.; Georgousis, G. Effect of silane treatment loading on the flexural properties of PLA/flax unidirectional composites. Compos. Commun. 2018, 10, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Zafeiropoulos, N.E.; Baillie, C.A.; Hodgkinson, J.M. Engineering and characterisation of the interface in flax fibre/polypropylene composite materials. Part II. The effect of surface treatments on the interface. Compos. Part. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2002, 33, 1185–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Joseph, K.; Varghese, S.; Kalaprasad, G.; Thomas, S.; Prasannakumari, L.; Koshy, P.; Pavithran, C. Influence of interfacial adhesion on the mechanical properties and fracture behaviour of short sisal fibre reinforced polymer composites. Eur. Polym. J. 1996, 32, 1243–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ray, K.; Patra, H.; Swain, A.K.; Parida, B.; Mahapatra, S.; Sahu, A.; Rana, S. Glass/jute/sisal fiber reinforced hybrid polypropylene polymer composites: Fabrication and analysis of mechanical and water absorption properties. Mater. Today Proc. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Parameshwaran, R.; Kalaiselvam, S. Energy efficient hybrid nanocomposite-based cool thermal storage air conditioning system for sustainable buildings. Energy 2013, 59, 194–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zhang, L.; Liu, W.; Wang, L.; Ling, Z. On-axis and off -axis compressive behavior of pultruded GFRP composites at elevated temperatures. Compos. Struct. 2020, 236, 111891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Sanjay, M.R.; Arpitha, G.R.; Naik, L.L.; Gopalakrishna, K.; Yogesha, B. Applications of Natural Fibers and Its Composites: An Overview. Nat. Resour. 2016, 7, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Viscusi, G.; Barra, G.; Verdolotti, L.; Galzerano, B.; Viscardi, M.; Gorrasi, G. Natural fiber reinforced inorganic foam composites from short hemp bast fibers obtained by mechanical decortation of unretted stems from the wastes of hemp cultivations. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 34, 176–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Westman, M.P.; Fifield, L.S.; Simmons, K.L.; Laddha, S.; Kafentzis, T.A. Natural Fiber Composites: A Review; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory: Richland, WA, USA, 2010.
  131. Holbery, J.; Houston, D. Natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites in automotive applications. JOM 2006, 58, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Lertwattanaruk, P.; Suntijitto, A. Properties of natural fiber cement materials containing coconut coir and oil palm fibers for residential building applications. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 94, 664–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Leao, A.L.; Rowell, R.; Tavares, N. Applications of natural fibers in automotive industry in Brazil—Thermoforming process. In Science and Technology of Polymers and Advanced Materials; Prasad, P.N., Mark, J.E., Kandil, S.H., Kafafi, Z.H., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1998; pp. 755–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Jothibasu, S.; Mohanamurugan, S.; Vijay, R.; Singaravelu, D.L.; Vinod, A.; Sanjay, R.M. Investigation on the mechanical behavior of areca sheath fibers/jute fibers/glass fabrics reinforced hybrid composite for light weight applications. J. Ind. Text. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ramesh, M.; Palanikumar, K.; Reddy, K.H. Comparative evaluation on properties of hybrid glass fiber-sisal/jute reinforced epoxy composites. Proc. Eng. 2013, 51, 745–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Satyanarayana, K.G.; Sukumaran, K.; Mukherjee, R.S.; Pavithran, C.; Piuai, S.G.K. Natural Fibre-Polymer Composites. Cement Concrete Compos. 1990, 12, 117–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Tholibon, D.; Tharazi, I.; Sulong, A.B.; Muhamad, N.; Ismial, N.F.; Radzi, M.K.F.M.; Radzuan, N.M.; Hui, D. Kenaf Fiber Composites: A Review on Synthetic and Biodegradable Polymer Matrix. J. Kejuruter. 2019, 31, 65–76. [Google Scholar]
  138. Sanjeevi, S.; Ayyanar, A.; Kalimuthu, R.; Susaiyappan, S. Effects of chemical modification on the mechanical properties of Calotropis Gigantea fiber-reinforced phenol formaldehyde biocomposites. Medziagotyra 2019, 26, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Jaafar, J.; Siregar, J.P.; Salleh, S.M.; Hamdan, M.H.M.; Cionita, T.; Rihayat, T. Important Considerations in Manufacturing of Natural Fiber Composites: A Review. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol. 2019, 6, 647–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Classification of different types of natural fibers and their sources.
Figure 1. Classification of different types of natural fibers and their sources.
Coatings 11 00293 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of cost/weight of different fibers.
Figure 2. Comparison of cost/weight of different fibers.
Coatings 11 00293 g002
Figure 3. Reactions involved in benzoylation treatment with sisal fibers (Reprinted from permission from [72]. Copyright 2021 Copyright Taylor & Francis).
Figure 3. Reactions involved in benzoylation treatment with sisal fibers (Reprinted from permission from [72]. Copyright 2021 Copyright Taylor & Francis).
Coatings 11 00293 g003
Figure 4. Reactions involved in maleated coupling agent technique (Reprinted from permission from [105]. Copyright 2021 Copyright Elsevier).
Figure 4. Reactions involved in maleated coupling agent technique (Reprinted from permission from [105]. Copyright 2021 Copyright Elsevier).
Coatings 11 00293 g004
Figure 5. SEM Images of different chemical treatments on flax fiber ((a,b) Reprinted from permission from [122]. Copyright 2021 Copyright Elsevier and (c,d) Reprinted from permission from [123]. Copyright 2021 Copyright Elsevier).
Figure 5. SEM Images of different chemical treatments on flax fiber ((a,b) Reprinted from permission from [122]. Copyright 2021 Copyright Elsevier and (c,d) Reprinted from permission from [123]. Copyright 2021 Copyright Elsevier).
Coatings 11 00293 g005
Figure 6. Different Manufacturing techniques for producing natural fiber composites (NFCs).
Figure 6. Different Manufacturing techniques for producing natural fiber composites (NFCs).
Coatings 11 00293 g006
Figure 7. General applications of natural fibers.
Figure 7. General applications of natural fibers.
Coatings 11 00293 g007
Table 1. Mechanical properties and composition of the most common natural fibers [50,57,64,65,66,67,68,69,70].
Table 1. Mechanical properties and composition of the most common natural fibers [50,57,64,65,66,67,68,69,70].
PropertiesNatural Fibers
CottonJuteHempCoirDate PalmFlaxRamieSisalPineapple
Elongation (%)3–101.5–1.81.615–302–191.2–3.02.0–9.02–1414
Density (g/cm3)1.5–1.61.3–1.41.41.20.9–121.4–1.51.51.3–1.51.4
Tensile Strength (MPa)280–580400–800550–900175–220300–800400–1500220–938400–700400–1600
Cellulose (%)82–9160–7071–7532–42467168–7667–7870–82
Lignin (%)12–133.7–5.740–45202.50.5–0.78–115–12
Tensile Modulus (GPa)6–1310–30704–6728–8044–1289–3834–82
Table 2. Different chemical treatments and their effect on natural fibers.
Table 2. Different chemical treatments and their effect on natural fibers.
Chemical Treatments NameCoconut FiberSisal FiberJute FiberBanana FiberHemp FiberKenaf FiberHemp FiberFlax FiberOil Palm FiberCotton FiberSignificance or ImprovementReferences
Alkaline treatmentyesyesyesyesyesyesAdhesion[88,98,99]
Silane treatmentyesyesyesControl Fiber Swelling[86,99,100]
Acetylation treatment--yesyesMoisture absorption[20,101]
Benzoylation treatment-yesyesThermal stability[102,103]
Peroxide treatment--yesAdhesion[103,104]
Maleated coupling agentsyesyesyesyesyesBonding between fibers and matrix[105]
Sodium chlorite treatmentyesyesyesyesyesMoisture absorption[105]
Acrylation and acrylonitrile graftingyesyesyesyescoupling[6,106]
Isocyanate treatmentyesyesyesyesBonding[94,106]
Oleoyl chloride treatmentyesyesWettability[85,93,106]
Stearic acid treatmentyesyesyesyesWater resistance[99,105,107]
Permanganate treatmentyesyesyesyesAdhesion[20]
Fungal treatmentyesyesyesRemove lignin[78,108]
Triazine treatmentyesAdhesion[109]
Table 3. Strength of chemicals and soaking time of different chemical treatments.
Table 3. Strength of chemicals and soaking time of different chemical treatments.
Treatment NameStrength of Chemical
(of Weight)
Soaking TimeCuring TemperatureReferences
Alkaline5%2 hRoom temperature[76,110,111]
Bleaching5%1 h60 °C[7,112]
Benzoyl Chloride30%30 min80 °C[72]
Potassium Permanganate0.125%3 minRoom temperature[7,103]
Maleated Coupling Agents20%5–10 minRoom temperature[105]
Acetylation2%2 hRoom temperature[113]
Isocyanates5%2 h40–45 °C[114]
Table 4. Effect of different chemical treatments on sisal-fiber-reinforced composites [100,124,125].
Table 4. Effect of different chemical treatments on sisal-fiber-reinforced composites [100,124,125].
Chemical TreatmentsConcentrationTensile Strength (MPa)Elongation at Break (%)Young’s Modulus (GPa)
Alkali5% and 10%3413.3
BenzoylationDifferent weight %4571.01
IsocyanateDifferent weight %4244.1
Permanganate0.06%3351.1
Stearic4%3251
Table 5. Applications of different natural fibres [38,48,132,133,134,135,136].
Table 5. Applications of different natural fibres [38,48,132,133,134,135,136].
Natural FibersApplications
Jute FiberSkateboards, Tensil, Hockey, wind-turbines blades, door knobs, automobile interior and exterior parts
Sisal FiberIn construction industry and also flax and sisal used in interior door-lining panels, MercedesBenz E-Class model
Oil Palm FiberStructural insulated panel, fencing and decking
Wood FiberIn decks, doors, and back seat of automobile as well as
molded panel components
Coconut FiberSoundproofing, cotton with PP/PET fibers used in trunk
Flax FiberSnowboarding laptop cases, tennis racket, automobile parts such as rearview mirror, and visor in two-wheeler;
geopolymers panels and Chevrolet Impala automobile trim panels
Kenaf FiberClothing-grade cloth passenger car bumper beam,
animal bedding, material that absorbs oil and liquids, packing material and mobile cases, and bags
Coir FiberStorage tank, packing material, and engine transmission cover;
Brazilian trucks’ trim parts of seat cushions
Bagasse FiberWindow frames and panels
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khalid, M.Y.; Imran, R.; Arif, Z.U.; Akram, N.; Arshad, H.; Al Rashid, A.; García Márquez, F.P. Developments in Chemical Treatments, Manufacturing Techniques and Potential Applications of Natural-Fibers-Based Biodegradable Composites. Coatings 2021, 11, 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030293

AMA Style

Khalid MY, Imran R, Arif ZU, Akram N, Arshad H, Al Rashid A, García Márquez FP. Developments in Chemical Treatments, Manufacturing Techniques and Potential Applications of Natural-Fibers-Based Biodegradable Composites. Coatings. 2021; 11(3):293. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030293

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khalid, Muhammad Yasir, Ramsha Imran, Zia Ullah Arif, Naveed Akram, Hassan Arshad, Ans Al Rashid, and Fausto Pedro García Márquez. 2021. "Developments in Chemical Treatments, Manufacturing Techniques and Potential Applications of Natural-Fibers-Based Biodegradable Composites" Coatings 11, no. 3: 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030293

APA Style

Khalid, M. Y., Imran, R., Arif, Z. U., Akram, N., Arshad, H., Al Rashid, A., & García Márquez, F. P. (2021). Developments in Chemical Treatments, Manufacturing Techniques and Potential Applications of Natural-Fibers-Based Biodegradable Composites. Coatings, 11(3), 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030293

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop