Next Article in Journal
Characterization of the Structure and Wear Resistance of Ni65-Based Coatings via HVOF Flame Spraying and Its Application to Potato Digging Shovels
Previous Article in Journal
Cold Spraying of Thick Biomimetic and Stoichiometric Apatite Coatings for Orthopaedic Implants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Performance of Insoluble IrO2 Anode for Sewage Sludge Cake Electrodehydration Application with Respect to Operation Conditions

1
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea
2
The Institute of Materials Technology, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea
3
Hydrogen Ship Technology Center, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea
4
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, 75321 Uppsala, Sweden
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(6), 724; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060724
Submission received: 20 April 2022 / Revised: 16 May 2022 / Accepted: 23 May 2022 / Published: 25 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Characterization of Electrochemical Materials)

Abstract

:
The efficient management of wastewater and sewage sludge treatment are becoming crucial with industrialization and increasing anthropological effects. Dehydration of sewage sludge cakes (SSCs) is typically carried out using mechanical and electrochemical processes. Using the mechanical dehydration process, only a limited amount of water can be removed, and the resultant SSCs have a water content of approximately 70–80 wt.%, which is significantly high for land dumping or recycling as solid fuel. Dumping high-moisture-content SSCs in land can lead to leakage of hazardous wastewater into the ground and cause economic loss. Therefore, dehydration of SSCs is crucial. Contemporary treatment methods focus on the development of anode materials for the electrochemical processes. IrO2 is an insoluble anode material that is eco-friendly, less expensive, and exhibits high chemical stability, and it has been widely used and investigated in wastewater treatment and electrodehydration (ED) industries. Herein, we evaluated the performance of the ED system developed using IrO2 anode material. The operating conditions of the anode such as reaction time, sludge thickness, and voltage on SSC were optimized. The performance of the ED system was evaluated based on the moisture content of SSCs after dehydration. The moisture content decreased proportionally with the reaction time, sludge thickness, and voltage. The moisture content of 40 wt.% was determined as the optimum quantity for land dumping or to be used as recycled solid fuel.

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of industry and human civilization, wastewater and sewage sludge generation have also increased rapidly [1,2,3]. Therefore, there is increased focus on methods for treating waste [4,5,6,7,8]. Until now, sewage sludge has been dumped in the ocean, which has currently become impossible owing to the international restriction on ocean and land dumping, as dumping in the ocean results in the release of hazardous chemicals and organics and pollutes the environment [5,7,8,9,10]. Processes involved in land dumping such as incineration, dumping, and composting have various disadvantages such as the amount of energy for incineration, requirement of dedicated land, and leachate [9]. Previous studies focused on overcoming these problems by focusing on moisture content. The moisture content should be <40 wt.% for land dumping to prevent leachate and the cost of dumping [9,11,12]. The moisture content should be <50 wt.% for self-thermal combustion.
Dehydration of sewage sludge cake (SSC) has been studied based on mechanical, thermal, and electrodehydration (ED) methods [7,8,13,14]. Water in SSCs can be divided into four categories: (i) free water, (ii) surface water, (iii) interstitial water, and (iv) bound water [15,16]. The most common mechanical dehydration method results in a moisture content of 70–80 wt.%, which indicates that only free water that is mechanically attached to the surface is removed. It is difficult to remove surface, interstitial, and bound water using mechanical dehydration. Using thermal dehydration, not only the surface water attached to the surface but also the interstitial and bound water inside the sludge pore (floc) can be removed. However, the thermal dehydration method requires an enormous amount of energy. The minimum amount of energy required for water vaporization is approximately 0.617 kwh/kg H2O [15]. The ED method, however, can extract all types of water in the sludge. Compared to thermal dehydration, the ED method is also attractive from an economic point of view. The ED method can efficiently remove the moisture that is physically and chemically combined with the sludge via electrophoresis and electro-osmosis, because of which it does not require large amounts of energy; in the thermal dehydration method, the water vapor enthalpy technique is used. In general, SSCs are mechanically dehydrated before ED processing; therefore, they do not contain any free water [17,18]. The ED process takes place at various stages. Initially, the solid particles in SSCs move toward the anode under the presence of an electric field. In this stage, residual free water is removed. Subsequently, interstitial and some of the surface water moves toward the cathode via electrophoresis, and some of the bound water moves by capillary force. In this stage, the flocs inside the SSCs are destroyed, and subsequently, the rest of the bound water is removed.
The anode used in the ED system should be resistant to properties such as oxidation, chemicals, corrosion, and thermal degradation. IrO2, boron-doped diamond (BDD), and Pt are considered representative materials [19,20,21]. However, BDD and Pt are considered expensive for application as anode materials for ED systems. Further research on reducing the fabrication cost is in progress [19,22]. IrO2 electrodes are cost-effective and also exhibit comparable performance to BDD. IrO2 is typically prepared using chemical bath deposition [23,24]. Numerous studies have been carried out on the fabrication methods and electrode characteristics of IrO2 [15,16,20,25]. However, studies on the operation parameters of ED systems with IrO2 anodes are limited. ED systems are widely used in various environmental conditions that exhibit diverse characteristics; therefore, the significance of studying the operating conditions is increased. The key parameters are the thickness of the SSC, voltage, and processing time. The dehydration performance can be increased by increasing the voltage and processing time and by decreasing the thickness of the SSC. However, increasing the voltage is economically disadvantageous owing to the high use of electrical energy. Further, on application of high voltage, there is a possibility that the dehydrated SSC is burned, and it cannot be used as recycled solid fuel. In addition, the application of high voltage can reduce the lifetime of the anode owing to corrosion and delamination.
In this study, we investigated various ED operation conditions such as the thickness of SSC, voltage, and processing time to determine which factor has the most influence on dehydration performance. Optimized conditions that result in high dehydration performance were suggested. The stability of IrO2 was evaluated under various operating conditions, and the performance of the ED system was estimated by comparing the moisture content before and after the ED process. The moisture contents were proportional to the thickness of the SSC, and inversely proportional to the voltage and processing time. The lowest moisture contents obtained was 33.4 wt.% at the following operation conditions: applied voltage of 70 mV/mm2, SSC thickness of 0.5 mm, and processing time of 140 s. However, after ED processing, the IrO2 electrode exhibited cracks on the surface. Therefore, the optimized conditions considering anode lifetime and cost efficiency were determined and are as follows: 70 mV/mm2 voltage, SSC thickness of 1 mm, and processing time of 140 s.

2. Materials and Methods

The SSCs used in this study were collected from a sewage treatment plant and a city in the Republic of Korea. The SSCs were dehydrated to 80 wt.% using a mechanical dehydration process and then stored at 2 °C. A laboratory-made, batch type ED system was used, and the photographs of the ED system are shown in Figure 1. A 50 × 50 mm2 IrO2 anode of 8 µm thickness coated on Ti (thickness = 2 mm) was purchased from Hankyung TNC corporation. SUS304 stainless steel was used as the cathode material. Details of the experimental parameters such as SSC thickness, voltage, and processing time are listed in Table 1.
The moisture content was analyzed conforming to waste process test standards of South Korea National Institute of Environmental Research Notice No. 2017-54. The electrochemical characteristics were evaluated using cyclic voltammetry (ZIVE LAB, ZIVE MP2). Pt was used as the counter electrode, and Ag/AgCl was used as the reference electrode. The measurement was conducted in 0.1 M H2SO4 electrolyte solution. The microstructure was observed using X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku, ULTIMA4), and the surface morphology and micro floc were observed using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, TESCAN, MIRA3).

3. Results

Figure 2 shows the moisture contents of SSCs after dehydration (using batch type dehydration system (Figure 1)) with respect to voltage and at various SSC thicknesses, such as (a) 2 mm, (b) 1 mm, and (c) 0.5 mm. As previously mentioned, the initial moisture contents of SSCs were 80 wt.%, after mechanical dehydration. The moisture content decreased with an increase in processing time and voltage in all three SSCs with varying thicknesses, as shown in Figure 2a–c. The moisture contents also decreased with a decrease in SSC thickness, and the lowest moisture content (33.4 wt.%) was obtained for SSC with 0.5 mm thickness (Figure 2c). In the case of SSC with 2 mm thickness (Figure 2a), at 10 and 30 mV/mm2 applied voltage, the moisture content did not decrease to 60 wt.%. This indicates that the 2 mm thick SSC requires applied voltage >30 mV/mm2 to completely remove the interstitial and surface water. As shown in Figure 2b,c, 10 mV/mm2 is not an adequate voltage to completely remove the water content. However, an applied voltage of 50 and 70 mV/mm2 for the 2 mm thick SSC resulted in the removal of interstitial and surface water. In addition, for an applied voltage of 70 mV/mm2, the bound water was totally removed in 60 s from 0.5-and 1 mm thick SSCs. In the case of the 0.5 mm thick SSC (Figure 2c), applied voltages of 30, 50, and 70 mV/mm2 resulted in the removal of interstitial and surface water in 30 s. As mentioned previously, the moisture content should be <40 wt.% for land dumping or to be used as solid recovered fuel (SRF). Applied voltages of 10 and 30 mV/mm2 did not decrease moisture content to <40 wt.%. In the case of 0.5 mm thick SSC, applied voltage of 50 mV/mm2 resulted in moisture content of <40 wt.% in 140 s. In the case of 1 mm thick SSC, an applied voltage of 70 mV/mm2 resulted in moisture content of <40 wt.% in 140 s. At the same applied voltage, the 0.5 mm thick SSC resulted in 33.4 wt.% moisture content in 140 s. This indicates that applied voltages of 50 and 70 mV/mm2 result in the removal of not only the interstitial and surface water but also the bound water and flocs in SSCs.
Figure 3 shows dehydration rates of SSC at various thicknesses with respect to voltage and processing time. The dehydration rate was calculated by determining the moisture content before and after the ED process. In general, the ED process occurs in two steps. The first step is the removal of the interstitial and surface water, and the second step is the removal of bound water, which occurs when the flocs present inside the SCCs are destroyed. Applied voltages of 10 and 30 mV/mm2 do not yield a remarkable dehydration rate. An applied voltage of 10 mV/mm2 for SSC with thicknesses >1 mm does not result in any evident dehydration process. In the case of the 0.5 mm thick SSC, an applied voltage of 10 mV/mm2 resulted in the removal of the interstitial, surface, and some of the bound water in 120 s. When the applied voltage was 50 mV/mm2, an evident first peak and a small second peak were observed. It is assumed that the interstitial and the surface water were completely removed, but bound water was still present in the flocs in the SSC. For an applied voltage of 70 mV/mm2, a single peak was observed in all the SSCs of varying thicknesses, showing that all the three types of water were removed at the same time. Two evident peaks were not observed at an applied voltage of 70 mV/mm2. However, two evident peaks were observed at applied voltages of 50 mV/mm2 and 10 mV/mm2 for SSCs with thicknesses of 2 mm and 0.5 mm, respectively.
Figure 4 shows the surface images of SSC after the ED process under operation duration of 140 s, SSC thickness of 1 mm, and at various applied voltages as follows: (a) as collected, (b) 10 mV/mm2, (c) 30 mV/mm2, (d) 50 mV/mm2, and (e) 70 mV/mm2. As mentioned earlier, the flocs interrupt the dehydration process as the bound water is stored inside. To obtain low moisture content and efficient dehydration, the flocs need to be destroyed, and the water inside the flocs should be removed. The flocs appeared to be uniform and intact up to an applied voltage of 30 mV/mm2; however, above 50 mV/mm2, the flocs appeared to be completely destroyed during the ED process. With the removal of bound water from SSCs, low moisture content and high dehydration rate are expected, which is in good agreement with the results shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. The moisture content should be <40 wt.%, for land dumping or to be used as SRF, and moisture content <50 wt.% can only be achieved when the flocs are destroyed.
Application of high voltage could wear out the anode and therefore decrease the lifetime of the IrO2 anode. Therefore, the applied potential and morphological changes observed on the surface of the anode were used as the criteria for evaluating the lifetime of the anode. Figure 5a shows the cyclic voltammetry of the IrO2 anode as-deposited and after the ED process of 1 mm thick SSC at applied voltages of 50 mV/mm2 and 70 mV/mm2 and at a processing duration of 140 s. A significant difference in the potential window was not observed (1.4 eV) [6,23]. It indicates that the lifetime of the IrO2 anode was not affected under the applied potential of 50 mV/mm2 and 70 mV/mm2, which was initially assumed as a severe condition for the anode resulting in a decrease in their lifetimes. Figure 5b–d shows the surface morphology of IrO2 anodes as follows: (b) as-deposited, (c) after ED at 50 mV/mm2, and (d) after ED at 70 mV/mm2. The morphology of the as-deposited IrO2 anode shows typical mud-crack shapes on the surface. The surface morphology at 50 mV/mm2 applied voltage does not show significant changes except the small extension of mud cracks due to the solution process. However, in the case of applied voltage of 70 mV/mm2, partial delamination was observed. It is expected that the delamination only occurs only on the surface region, and it does not affect the entire anode material. The potential window, which indicates the ability to undergo the electro-osmosis phenomenon, indicates that the ED process was stable.
As surface morphology provides information only about the surface, and the XRD analysis can evaluate the entire anode due to deeper penetration of X-ray (~10 μm), XRD measurements were conducted to understand the lifetime of the anode after the ED process. Figure 6 shows the XRD patterns of the as-deposited IrO2 anode and the anode after the ED process under the operating conditions of 1 mm SSC thickness, applied voltage of 50 mV/mm2 and 70 mV/mm2, and processing duration of 140 s. The red circle indicates the peak corresponding to Ti substrate, and the IrO2 showed preferred orientation r (221) regardless of the operating conditions of the ED process. If the delamination of the surface has significantly influenced the microstructure of the IrO2 anode and resulted in lattice contraction of extension, then the IrO2 peaks should be shifted. But such a shift in the peak was not observed. Therefore, it can be concluded that the surface delamination observed at 70 mV/mm2 voltage (Figure 5d) did not affect the lifetime of the anode. Significant evidence of the deterioration of the anode was not observed in the potential window and XRD evaluation of IrO2.

4. Conclusions

IrO2 anode material for the ED process was evaluated using a laboratory-made batch type ED system, and the operation conditions of the ED system were optimized. The key factors that mainly affect the ED process including applied voltage, processing time, and thickness of SSC were investigated. The moisture content proportionally decreased with decreases and increased with the thickness of SSC, and voltage and processing time. In the early stage of the ED process, dehydration from interstitial and surface water occurred, and then, the bound water that exists inside the flocs is removed. The proper dehydration that can be used as SRF (<40 wt.%) can be achieved only at applied 70 mV/mm2 and at an SSC thickness of <1 mm. The dehydration rate at 50 and 70 mV/mm2 clearly showed the removal of the interstitial and surface water, and also showed the removal of the bound water, which can be achieved via flocs destruction (Figure 5 d,e). The SSC of 0.5 mm thickness at 70 mV/mm2 applied voltage showed the lowest moisture content and dehydration rate, but it is hard to adjust this for industry owing to its low dehydration capacity, which is directly connected to cost. Therefore, the dehydration system for SSC using IrO2 as an anode can be summarized as 70 mV/mm2 applied voltage, SSC thickness of 1 mm, and the processing duration of 140 s.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K. and M.-Y.Y.; methodology, S.K. and M.-Y.Y.; formal analysis, M.-Y.Y.; investigation, S.K. and M.-Y.Y.; data curation, S.K. and M.-Y.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, N.-Y.L. and S.K.; writing—review and editing, S.K., M.-Y.Y. and P.K.S.; visualization, S.K.; supervision, P.K.S.; funding acquisition, J.L. and P.K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partly supported by the Technology Development Program of MSS (S2780957) and by the Ministry of the Environment (G232019012551) and by the Korea Industrial Complex Corporation (HRBS2116), and partially supported by R&D Platform Establishment of Eco-Friendly Hydrogen Propulsion Ship Program (No. 20006644). This research was supported by Development and demonstration of on-board marine debris disposal modules program of Korea institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (KIMST-20220494).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tuan, P.A.; Jurate, V.; Mika, S. Electro-Dewatering of Sludge under Pressure and Non-Pressure Conditions. Environ. Technol. 2008, 29, 1075–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Acar, Y.B.; Gale, R.J.; Alshawabkeh, A.N.; Marks, R.E.; Puppala, S.; Bricka, M.; Parker, R. Electrokinetic Remediation: Basics and Technology Status. J. Hazard. Mater. 1995, 40, 117–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chu, C.P.; Lee, D.J.; Liu, Z.; Jin, W.H. Morphology of Sludge Cake at Electroosmosis Dewatering. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2004, 39, 1331–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Iwata, M.; Tanaka, T.; Jami, M.S. Application of Electroosmosis for Sludge Dewatering-A Review. Dry. Technol. 2013, 31, 170–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Patel, P.S.; Bandre, N.; Saraf, A.; Ruparelia, J.P. Electro-Catalytic Materials (Electrode Materials) in Electrochemical Wastewater Treatment. Procedia Eng. 2013, 51, 430–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ren, Z.; Quan, S.; Gao, J.; Li, W.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chai, B.; Wang, Y. The Electrocatalytic Activity of IrO2-Ta2O5 Anode Materials and Electrolyzed Oxidizing Water Preparation and Sterilization Effect. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 8778–8786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sun, X.; Ma, D.; Lin, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Q. Research on Push-Type Sludge Electro-Dewatering Equipment with Fixed-Plate Electrodes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 267, 118612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, Y.; Cao, M.; Lv, H.; Wei, J.; Gu, Y.; Liu, D.; Zhang, W.; Ryan, M.P.; Wu, X. Electrodeposited Nanometer-Size IrO2/Ti Electrodes with 0.3 mg IrO2 cm−2 for Sludge Dewatering Electrolysers. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 265, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Marttinen, S.K.; Kettunen, R.H.; Rintala, J.A. Occurrence and Removal of Organic Pollutants in Sewages and Landfill Leachates. Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 301, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lu, Z.X.; Shi, Y.; Gupta, P.; Min, X.P.; Tan, H.Y.; Wang, Z.D.; Guo, C.Q.; Zou, Z.Q.; Yang, H.; Mukerjee, S.; et al. Electrochemical Fabrication of IrOx Nanoarrays with Tunable Length and Morphology for Solid Polymer Electrolyte Water Electrolysis. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 348, 136302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saveyn, H.; Pauwels, G.; Timmerman, R.; Van Der Meeren, P. Effect of Polyelectrolyte Conditioning on the Enhanced Dewatering of Activated Sludge by Application of an Electric Field during the Expression Phase. Water Res. 2005, 39, 3012–3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Raats, M.H.M.; Van Diemen, A.J.G.; Lavèn, J.; Stein, H.N. Full Scale Electrokinetic Dewatering of Waste Sludge. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2002, 210, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bozal-Ginesta, C.; Rao, R.R.; Mesa, C.A.; Liu, X.; Hillman, S.A.J.; Stephens, I.E.L.; Durrant, J.R. Redox-State Kinetics in Water-Oxidation IrOx Electrocatalysts Measured by Operando Spectroelectrochemistry. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 15013–15025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mehdipour, M.; Tabaian, S.H.; Firoozi, S. Anodic Electrodeposition of Ligand-Free Iridium Oxide on Titanium with High Mass Loading and Study of Electrochemical Treatments. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 858, 113831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mahmoud, A.; Hoadley, A.F.A.; Citeau, M.; Sorbet, J.M.; Olivier, G.; Vaxelaire, J.; Olivier, J. A Comparative Study of Electro-Dewatering Process Performance for Activated and Digested Wastewater Sludge. Water Res. 2018, 129, 66–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mahmoud, A.; Olivier, J.; Vaxelaire, J.; Hoadley, A.F.A. Electro-Dewatering of Wastewater Sludge: Influence of the Operating Conditions and Their Interactions Effects. Water Res. 2011, 45, 2795–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mahmoud, A.; Hoadley, A.F.A.; Conrardy, J.B.; Olivier, J.; Vaxelaire, J. Influence of Process Operating Parameters on Dryness Level and Energy Saving during Wastewater Sludge Electro-Dewatering. Water Res. 2016, 103, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Olivier, J.; Conrardy, J.B.; Mahmoud, A.; Vaxelaire, J. Electro-Dewatering of Wastewater Sludge: An Investigation of the Relationship between Filtrate Flow Rate and Electric Current. Water Res. 2015, 82, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, S.-H.; You, M.-Y.; Kim, W.-R.; Song, P.-K. Effect of TiN Layer on Boron Doped Diamond/Ti Electrodes for Wastewater Treatment. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2018, 10, 830–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, J.M.; Meng, H.M.; Zhang, J.Q.; Cao, C.N. Degradation Mechanism of Long Service Life Ti/IrO2-Ta2O5 Oxide Anodes in Sulphuric Acid. Corros. Sci. 2002, 44, 1655–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ribeiro, J.; De Andrade, A.R. Characterization of RuO2-Ta2O5 Coated Titanium Electrode. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, D106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, S.; Kim, S.-H.; You, M.-Y.; Yoon, J.-H.; Song, P.-K. Characteristics of Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes Deposited on Titanium Substrate with TiNx Interlayer. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2018, 10, 722–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Patil, P.S.; Chigare, P.S.; Sadale, S.B.; Seth, T.; Amalnerkar, D.P.; Kawar, R.K. Thickness-Dependent Properties of Sprayed Iridium Oxide Thin Films. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2003, 80, 667–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cruz, J.C.; Baglio, V.; Siracusano, S.; Ornelas, R.; Ortiz-Frade, L.; Arriaga, L.G.; Antonucci, V.; Aricò, A.S. Nanosized IrO2 Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction in an SPE Electrolyzer. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2011, 13, 1639–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Feng, J.; Wang, Y.L.; Ji, X.Y. Dynamic Changes in the Characteristics and Components of Activated Sludge and Filtrate during the Pressurized Electro-Osmotic Dewatering Process. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 134, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Photographs of laboratory-made batch type dehydration system; (b) schematic image of the anode and cathode assembly. The anode and cathode material are IrO2 and SUS304, respectively.
Figure 1. (a) Photographs of laboratory-made batch type dehydration system; (b) schematic image of the anode and cathode assembly. The anode and cathode material are IrO2 and SUS304, respectively.
Coatings 12 00724 g001
Figure 2. Moisture content with respect to processing time of sewage sludge cake thickness (a) 2 mm, (b) 1 mm, and (c) 0.5 mm.
Figure 2. Moisture content with respect to processing time of sewage sludge cake thickness (a) 2 mm, (b) 1 mm, and (c) 0.5 mm.
Coatings 12 00724 g002
Figure 3. Dehydration rates of sewage sludge cakes with various voltages with respect to processing times of (a) 2 mm, (b) 1 mm, and (c) 0.5 mm.
Figure 3. Dehydration rates of sewage sludge cakes with various voltages with respect to processing times of (a) 2 mm, (b) 1 mm, and (c) 0.5 mm.
Coatings 12 00724 g003
Figure 4. Floc images of sewage sludge cake after electrodehydration process at (a) as collected, (b) 10 mV/mm2, (c) 30 mV/mm2, (d) 50 mV/mm2, and (e) 70 mV/mm2 (ED processing time: 140 s, SSC thickness: 1 mm). Flocs in the sludge cake are clearly destroyed above 50 mV/mm2.
Figure 4. Floc images of sewage sludge cake after electrodehydration process at (a) as collected, (b) 10 mV/mm2, (c) 30 mV/mm2, (d) 50 mV/mm2, and (e) 70 mV/mm2 (ED processing time: 140 s, SSC thickness: 1 mm). Flocs in the sludge cake are clearly destroyed above 50 mV/mm2.
Coatings 12 00724 g004
Figure 5. (a) Cyclic voltammetry curves and surface images (b) of as-deposited IrO2, after ED process at (c) 50 and (d) 70 mV/mm2. High-voltage processing does not show significant difference in potential window but causes delamination at 70 mV/mm2 (ED processing time: 140 s, SSC thickness: 1 mm).
Figure 5. (a) Cyclic voltammetry curves and surface images (b) of as-deposited IrO2, after ED process at (c) 50 and (d) 70 mV/mm2. High-voltage processing does not show significant difference in potential window but causes delamination at 70 mV/mm2 (ED processing time: 140 s, SSC thickness: 1 mm).
Coatings 12 00724 g005
Figure 6. XRD patterns of (a) as-deposited, and after ED process at (b) 50 mV/mm2 and (c) 70 mV/mm2. Even 70 mV/mm2 shows parts of delamination (Figure 5d), it does not show significant difference in XRD patterns (ED processing time: 140 s, SSC thickness: 1 mm).
Figure 6. XRD patterns of (a) as-deposited, and after ED process at (b) 50 mV/mm2 and (c) 70 mV/mm2. Even 70 mV/mm2 shows parts of delamination (Figure 5d), it does not show significant difference in XRD patterns (ED processing time: 140 s, SSC thickness: 1 mm).
Coatings 12 00724 g006
Table 1. Experimental parameters for electrodehydration process using IrO2 anode.
Table 1. Experimental parameters for electrodehydration process using IrO2 anode.
Experimental ParameterValues
Initial moisture contents (wt.%)80
Processing time (s)0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 140
SSC thickness (mm)0.5, 1, 2
Voltage (mV/mm2)10, 30, 50, 70
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, N.-Y.; You, M.-Y.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.; Song, P.K. Performance of Insoluble IrO2 Anode for Sewage Sludge Cake Electrodehydration Application with Respect to Operation Conditions. Coatings 2022, 12, 724. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060724

AMA Style

Lee N-Y, You M-Y, Lee J, Kim S, Song PK. Performance of Insoluble IrO2 Anode for Sewage Sludge Cake Electrodehydration Application with Respect to Operation Conditions. Coatings. 2022; 12(6):724. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060724

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Nam-Young, Mi-Young You, Jaemyung Lee, Seohan Kim, and Pung Keun Song. 2022. "Performance of Insoluble IrO2 Anode for Sewage Sludge Cake Electrodehydration Application with Respect to Operation Conditions" Coatings 12, no. 6: 724. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060724

APA Style

Lee, N. -Y., You, M. -Y., Lee, J., Kim, S., & Song, P. K. (2022). Performance of Insoluble IrO2 Anode for Sewage Sludge Cake Electrodehydration Application with Respect to Operation Conditions. Coatings, 12(6), 724. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060724

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop