A Review of High-Speed Turning of AISI 4340 Steel with Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL)
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. High-Speed Turning of AISI 4340 Steel
3. Application of MQL in High-Speed Turning
4. Research Gap Analysis and Future Recommendation
5. Conclusions
- Hard part turning, typically applied to materials with a hardness exceeding 45 HRC, provides several benefits, including improved accuracy and tighter tolerances compared to traditional grinding methods. High-speed machining (HSM) in hard part turning involves cutting speeds several times faster than those of conventional machining. This accelerated speed increases localized overheating, which can lead to thermal softening of the workpieces and shorten tool life.
- High-speed machining introduces challenges such as elevated temperatures, stress concentration, and accelerated wear on cutting tools, which underscore the need for advanced tool materials. Careful selection of cutting parameters is essential to achieving high-quality parts while effectively managing heat generation. This approach helps prevent damage to the workpiece surface integrity and minimizes tool wear, ensuring consistent and reliable machining performance.
- Minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) is an emerging cooling technique in machining where a small amount of lubricant is atomized in compressed airflow to create a mist directed at the cutting zone. Its advantage lies in the micron-sized mist particles that quickly penetrate hot zones due to their small droplet size. This aids in efficient chip disposal and offers long-term sustainability with minimal maintenance. MQL effectively removes heat through fluid vaporization, pressurized air spray, and fluid droplets as lubricants, making it a promising alternative to dry machining for high-speed turning of hardened steel.
- Despite its advantages, minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) encounters challenges such as insufficient cooling capacity, constraints in machining hard materials, and issues with chip disposal efficiency. The effectiveness of MQL is heavily dependent on fluid penetration and lubrication effectiveness, which are influenced by factors such as nozzle angle and air pressure. Innovations like MQL using nanofluids demonstrate potential for reducing tool wear; however, cost considerations currently restrict widespread adoption.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ademuyiwa, F.; Afolalu, S.A.; Yusuf, O.O.; Emetere, M.E. Influence of Cutting Fluid and Parameters on Machining and Cooling Techniques in Recent Technology. In Advanced Manufacturing in Biological, Petroleum, and Nanotechnology Processing; Ayeni, A.O., Oladokun, O., Orodu, O.D., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 55–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pritima, D.; Veerappan, G.; Azaath, L.M.; Ravichandran, M. Investigation and Finite Element Simulation on the MRR and Tool Wear of Aluminium Silicon Alloy during Turning Process. Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop. 2022, 10, 025027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trent, E.; Wright, P. Metal Cutting, 4th ed.; Butterworth–Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2000; ISBN 075067069X. [Google Scholar]
- Ghani, J.A.; Natasha, A.R.; Che Hassan, C.H.; Syarif, J. TRIZ Approach for Machining Process Innovation in Cryogenic Environment. Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol. 2016, 53, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abukhshim, N.A.; Mativenga, P.T.; Sheikh, M.A. Heat Generation and Temperature Prediction in Metal Cutting: A Review and Implications for High Speed Machining. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2006, 46, 782–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazeem, R.A.; Fadare, D.A.; Ikumapayi, O.M.; Adediran, A.A.; Aliyu, S.J.; Akinlabi, S.A.; Jen, T.C.; Akinlabi, E.T. Advances in the Application of Vegetable-Oil-Based Cutting Fluids to Sustainable Machining Operations—A Review. Lubricants 2022, 10, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Natasha, A.R.; Ghani, J.A.; Che Haron, C.H.; Syarif, J.; Musfirah, A.H. Temperature at the Tool-Chip Interface in Cryogenic and Dry Turning of AISI 4340 Using Carbide Tool. Int. J. Simul. Model. 2016, 15, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pervaiz, S.; Kannan, S.; Kishawy, H.A. An Extensive Review of the Water Consumption and Cutting Fluid Based Sustainability Concerns in the Metal Cutting Sector. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 134–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazumder, S.; Ghosh, K.; Singh, B.K.; Chakraborty, S.S.; Mandal, N. Experimental and Finite Element Analyses for High-Speed Machining of AISI 4340 Steel with ZTA Insert. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. C 2023, 104, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parimala, N.; Mahendra, G.; Vamsi Krishna, P. Modelling and Simulation of Nanofluids to Study Cooling and Lubrication Effect. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 22, 2941–2949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gowthaman, B.; Boopathy, S.R.; Kanagaraju, T. Effect of LN2and CO2 Coolants in Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Steel Using Tungsten Carbide Tool. Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop. 2022, 10, 015032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrawal, S.; Joshi, S.S. Analytical Modelling of Residual Stresses in Orthogonal Machining of AISI4340 Steel. J. Manuf. Process. 2013, 15, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, A.T.; El Rayes, M.M.; Luqman, M.; Naeim, N.; Hegab, H.; Elkaseer, A. On the Assessment of Surface Quality and Productivity Aspects in Precision Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Steel Alloy: Relative Performance of Wiper vs. Conventional Inserts. Materials 2020, 13, 2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jouini, N.; Revel, P.; Thoquenne, G. Influence of surface integrity on fatigue life of bearing rings finished by precision hard turning and grinding. J. Manuf. Process. 2020, 57, 444–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, S.; Kumar, R.; Das, R.K.; Sahoo, A.K. A Comprehensive Review on Machinability Aspects in Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Steel. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 390, 012009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.A.; Yoganath, V.G.; Krishna, P. Machinability of Hardened Alloy Steel Using Cryogenic Machining. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 8159–8167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Ghamdi, K.A.; Iqbal, A. A Sustainability Comparison between Conventional and High-Speed Machining. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 108, 192–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhamad, S.S.; Ghani, J.A.; Haron, C.H.C.; Yazid, H. Cryogenic Milling and Formation of Nanostructured Machined Surface of AISI 4340. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2020, 9, 1104–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, L.; Wang, D. Finite-Element-Analysis of the Effect of Different Wiper Tool Edge Geometries during the Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Steel. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2019, 94, 250–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, L.; Hossan, M.R. Effect on Cutting Force in Turning Hardened Tool Steels with Cubic Boron Nitride Inserts. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2007, 191, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shalaby, M.; Veldhuis, S. New Observations on High-Speed Machining of Hardened Aisi 4340 Steel Using Alumina-Based Ceramic Tools. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2018, 2, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sulaiman, S.; Roshan, A.; Ariffin, M.K.A. Finite Element Modelling of the Effect of Tool Rake Angle on Tool Temperature and Cutting Force during High Speed Machining of AISI 4340 Steel. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2013, 50, 012040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, A.; Bajpai, V. Introduction to High-Speed Machining (HSM). In High-Speed Machining; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Yao, P.; Qu, S.; Yu, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, W.; Huang, C.; Chu, D. Material Properties and Machining Characteristics under High Strain Rate in Ultra-Precision and Ultra-High-Speed Machining Process: A Review; Springer: London, UK, 2022; Volume 120, ISBN 0123456789. [Google Scholar]
- Liew, P.J.; Shaaroni, A.; Sidik, N.A.C.; Yan, J. An Overview of Current Status of Cutting Fluids and Cooling Techniques of Turning Hard Steel. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2017, 114, 380–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.R.; Kumar, A.; Dhupal, D.; Mohapatra, S.K. Optimization of Surface Roughness in Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Steel Using Coated Carbide Inserts. Int. J. Inf. Comput. Technol. 2013, 3, 871–880. [Google Scholar]
- Naigade, D.M.; Patil, D.H.; Sadaiah, M. Some Investigations in Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel in Different Cutting Environments by CBN Insert. Int. J. Mach. Mach. Mater. 2013, 14, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.R.; Nayak, R.P.; Dhupal, D.; Kumar, A. Surface Roughness, Machining Force and Flank Wear in Turning of Hardened AISI 4340 Steel with Coated Carbide Insert: Cutting Parameters Effects. Int. J. Automot. Eng. 2014, 4, 758–768. [Google Scholar]
- Chinchanikar, S.; Choudhury, S.K. Evaluation of Chip-Tool Interface Temperature: Effect of Tool Coating and Cutting Parameters during Turning Hardened AISI 4340 Steel. Procedia Mater. Sci. 2014, 6, 996–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pal, A.; Choudhury, S.K.; Chinchanikar, S. Machinability Assessment through Experimental Investigation during Hard and Soft Turning of Hardened Steel. Procedia Mater. Sci. 2014, 6, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saini, A.; Dhiman, S.; Sharma, R.; Setia, S. Experimental Estimation and Optimization of Process Parameters under Minimum Quantity Lubrication and Dry Turning of AISI-4340 with Different Carbide Inserts. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2014, 28, 2307–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jomaa, W.; Songmene, V.; Bocher, P. An Investigation of Machining-Induced Residual Stresses and Microstructure of Induction-Hardened AISI 4340 Steel. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2016, 31, 838–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranjan Das, S.; Panda, A.; Dhupal, D. Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Steel Using Coated Carbide Insert: Surface Roughness, Tool Wear, Chip Morphology and Cost Estimation. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 6560–6569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, C.; Zhang, F.; Sun, W.; Xu, X.; Wang, M. White Layer Formation Mechanism in Dry Turning Hardened Steel. J. Adv. Mech. Des. Syst. Manuf. 2018, 12, JAMDSM0044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunjal, S.U.; Patil, N.G. Experimental Investigations into Turning of Hardened AISI 4340 Steel Using Vegetable Based Cutting Fluids under Minimum Quantity Lubrication. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 20, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patole, P.B.; Kulkarni, V.V. Prediction of Surface Roughness and Cutting Force under MQL Turning of AISI 4340 with Nano Fluid by Using Response Surface Methodology. Manuf. Rev. 2018, 5, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanmai Sai Geetha, C.H.; Dash, A.K.; Kavya, B.; Amrita, M. Analysis of Hybrid Nanofluids in Machining AISI 4340 Using Minimum Quantity Lubrication. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 43, 579–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bag, R.; Panda, A.; Sahoo, A.K.; Kumar, R. Sustainable High-Speed Hard Machining of AISI 4340 Steel Under Dry. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2022, 48, 3073–3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagri, N.K.; Jain, N.K.; Petare, A.; Das, S.R.; Tharwan, M.Y.; Alansari, A.; Alqahtani, B.; Fattouh, M.; Elsheikh, A. Investigation on the Performance of Coated Carbide Tool during Dry Turning of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel. Materials 2023, 16, 668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krishnakumar, P.; Prakash Marimuthu, K.; Rameshkumar, K.; Ramachandran, K.I. Finite Element Simulation of Effect of Residual Stresses during Orthogonal Machining Using ALE Approach. Int. J. Mach. Mach. Mater. 2013, 14, 213–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iynen, O.; Ekşi, A.K.; Özdemir, M.; Akylldlz, H.K. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Cutting Forces during Turning of Cylindrical AISI 4340 Steel Specimens. Mater. Test. 2021, 63, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.; Wang, D.; Zhang, J.; Nadykto, A.B. Study on the Formation Mechanism of Cutting Dead Metal Zone for Turning AISI4340 with Different Chamfering Tools. Micromachines 2022, 13, 1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dhananchezian, M. A Comparative Study of Dry Turning Performance of 4340 Alloy Steel with As-Received and Cryogenically Treated Coated Cermet Cutting Tools. Int. J. Automot. Mech. Eng. 2024, 21, 11302–11315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, C.; Cai, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, M. A Method for Fe Simulation of Serrated Chip Formation during High Speed Machining Hardened Steel. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management IEEM 2008, Singapore, 8–11 December 2008; pp. 1408–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bag, R.; Panda, A.; Sahoo, A.K.; Kumar, R. A Comprehensive Review on AISI 4340 Hardened Steel: Emphasis on Industry Implemented Machining Settings, Implications, and Statistical Analysis. Int. J. Integr. Eng. 2020, 12, 61–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, R.K.; Sahoo, A.K.; Mishra, P.C.; Kumar, R.; Panda, A. Comparative Machinability Performance of Heat Treated 4340 Steel under Dry and Minimum Quantity Lubrication Surroundings. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 20, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benedicto, E.; Carou, D.; Rubio, E.M. Technical, Economic and Environmental Review of the Lubrication/Cooling Systems Used in Machining Processes. Procedia Eng. 2017, 184, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sohrabpoor, H.; Khanghah, S.P.; Teimouri, R. Investigation of Lubricant Condition and Machining Parameters While Turning of AISI 4340. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014, 76, 2099–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R. Minimum Quantity Lubrication Turning of Hard to Cut Materials—A Review. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 37, 3601–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamran, N.N.N.; Ghani, J.A.; Ramli, R.; Haron, C.H.C. A Review on Recent Development of Minimum Quantity Lubrication for Sustainable Machining. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 268, 122165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boswell, B.; Islam, M.N.; Davies, I.J.; Ginting, Y.R.; Ong, A.K. A Review Identifying the Effectiveness of Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) during Conventional Machining. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 92, 321–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urmi, W.T.; Rahman, M.M.; Safiei, W.; Kadirgama, K.; Maleque, M.A. Effects of Minimum Quantity Lubrication Technique in Different Machining Processes—A Comprehensive Review. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2022, 90, 135–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultana, N.; Dhar, N.R. A Critical Review on the Progress of MQL in Machining Hardened Steels. Adv. Mater. Process. Technol. 2022, 8, 3834–3858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walker, T. A Guide to Machining with Minimum Quantity Lubrication; UNIST, Inc.: Grand Rapids, MI, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Zulkifli, Z.; Halim, N.H.A.; Solihin, Z.H.; Saedon, J.; Ahmad, A.A.; Abdullah, A.H.; Raof, N.A.; Hadi, M.A. The Analysis of Grid Independence Study in Continuous Disperse of MQL Delivery System. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2023, 17, 9586–9596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, L.; Luo, K.; Jiang, T.; Xie, H.; Li, Y.; Xiang, Z.; Jiang, F. Parameter Optimization of the MQL Nozzle by the Computational Fluid Dynamics. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2023, 131, 4797–4810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, A.A.; Ghani, J.A.; Haron, C.H.C. Green Lubrication Technique for Sustainable Machining of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel. J. Tribol. 2021, 28, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Maruda, R.W.; Szczotkarz, N.; Wojciechowski, S.; Gawlik, J.; Królczyk, G.M. Metrological Relations between the Spray Atomization Parameters of a Cutting Fluid and Formation of a Surface Topography and Cutting Force. Measurement 2023, 219, 113255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jadhav, P.A.; Deivanathan, R. Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Droplet Size for MQL Aerosol under Different Operating Parameters with Flow Visualization. Eng. Res. Express 2023, 5, 035069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunjal, S.U.; Sanap, S.B.; Patil, N.G. Role of Cutting Fluids under Minimum Quantity Lubrication: An Experimental Investigation of Chip Thickness. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 28, 1101–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patole, P.B.; Kulkarni, V.V. Optimization of Process Parameters Based on Surface Roughness and Cutting Force in MQL Turning of AISI 4340 Using Nano Fluid. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miriyala, V.B.R.; Patil, B.T.; Shaikh, V.A.; Sudhakar, D.S.S.; Deshmukh, S. Investigations of Surface Roughness and Temperatures in Vegetable Oil-Based n-MQL Turning of AISI 4340 Steel. J. Eng. Proj. Prod. Manag. 2024, 14, 0003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Element | C | Si | Mn | P | S | Cr | Mo | Ni |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum (wt.%) | 0.37 | 0.10 | 0.55 | 0 | 0 | 0.65 | 0.20 | 1.55 |
Maximum (wt.%) | 0.44 | 0.35 | 0.90 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.95 | 0.35 | 2.00 |
Ref. | Initial Hardness (HRC) | Cutting Speed V (m/min) | Feed Rate f (mm/rev) | Depth of Cut d (mm) | Cooling Condition | Cutting Tool |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[26] | 47 | 90, 120, 150 | 0.1, 0.15, 0.2 | 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 | Dry | CVD-coated carbide |
[27] | 45 | 100, 120, 140 | 0.08, 0.09, 0.1 | 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 | Dry, MQL | CBN |
[28] | 49 | 140, 200, 260 | 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 | 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 | Dry | CVD-coated carbide |
[29] | 35 | 100, 142, 200, 265, 300 | 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3 | 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 | Dry | PVD- and CVD-coated carbide |
[30] | 35, 45, 55 | 100, 120, 150, 180, 200 | 0.081, 0.088, 0.13, 0.138, 0.15 | 0.1–0.5 | Dry | TiC mixed alumina ceramic |
[31] | 39 | 39.75, 55.91, 88.74, 137.5 | 0.066, 0.08, 0.10, 0.133 | 0.6 | Dry, MQL | CVD- and PVD-coated carbide |
[32] | 58–60 | 54, 128, 202 | 0.01, 0.08, 0.15 | 0.5 | Dry | PVD-coated ceramic |
[33] | 49 | 100, 160, 220 | 0.05, 0.09, 0.13 | 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 | Dry | CVD-coated carbide |
[34] | 50, 55, 60 | 200, 250, 350, 450, 550 | 0.1, 0.15, 0.2 | N/A | Dry | PCBN |
[35] | 52–54 | 200, 220, 240 | 0.1 | 0.25 | Dry, MQL | PVD-coated carbide |
[36] | 217BHN | 75, 90 | 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.1, 0.12 | 0.5, 1, 1.5 | MQL | Tungsten Carbide |
[21] | 52 | 150, 250, 700, 1000 | 0.1 | 0.1255 | Dry | Alumina ceramic + ZrO2 |
[37] | N/A | 60, 80, 100 | 0.15, 0.2, 0.3 | 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.4 | Dry, MQL | Cemented carbide |
[38] | 50 | 80, 170, 260 | 0.05, 0.1, 0.15 | 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 | Dry | CVD- and PVD-coated carbide |
[39] | 17 | 112–320 | 0.1, 0.16, 0.2, 0.28 | 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 | Dry | CVD-coated carbide |
[40] | N/A | 120 | 0.1 | N/A | Dry | Carbide |
[41] | 30 | 150 | 0.1–0.3 | N/A | Dry | PVD-coated |
[42] | N/A | 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 | N/A | N/A | Dry | CBN |
[9] | 19 | 210, 260, 350 | 0.08, 0.14, 0.2 | 0.5, 1, 1.5 | Dry | ZTA ceramic |
[43] | N/A | 55, 90, 150 | 0.111 | 1 | Dry | Coated cermet |
Ref. | Cooling Condition | MQL Parameter | Machining Parameter (V, f, d) | Fluid Type | Main Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[27] | Dry, Wet, MQL | 5 L/min, 6-bar air pressure | 100–140 m/min, 0.08–0.1 mm/rev, 0.5–1.0 mm | Commercially available mineral oil formulated by adding additives. | In MQL, compared to dry and wet turning, lower cutting forces, feed forces, and radial forces were observed. This is due to the higher pressure (6 bars) and velocity at which the cutting fluid is supplied in MQL. The fluid is fragmented into small drops, and its high velocity allows it to reach the tool–chip interface effectively. This reduces friction between the tool and chip, ultimately leading to a decrease in cutting force. |
[31] | Dry, MQL | 300 mL/h, 4-bar air pressure | 39–137 m/min, 0.07–0.13 mm/rev, 0.6 mm | General purpose soluble cutting oil. | MQL machining offers superior cutting performance compared to dry machining by reducing cutting forces and cutting temperature. It achieves this by decreasing all components of cutting forces, including cutting temperature, which enhances the interaction between the chip and tool and maintains cutting edge sharpness. When using CVD-coated inserts, MQL machining results in a 17.07% reduction in cutting forces, and with PVD-coated inserts, a 13.25% reduction is observed. Additionally, MQL reduces cutting tool-tip temperature by 5.73% with CVD-coated inserts and 6.72% with PVD-coated inserts. |
[48] | Dry, Air Cool, Wet, MQL | 1–3-bar air pressure | 250–1000 rpm, 0.2–0.28 mm/rev, 0.2–2 mm | Soluble oil for cutting fluid. | MQL leads to reduced surface roughness and less tool wear by lowering the cutting temperature and improving chip removal. An ANOVA analysis showed that cutting speed and feed rate are the most influential factors. An ANFIS surface analysis revealed that lower feed rates, higher cutting speeds, greater depths of cut, smaller cutting angles, and higher mist pressure result in smoother surfaces. Conversely, lower feed rates, slower cutting speeds, shallower depths of cut, larger cutting angles, and higher mist pressure contribute to reduced tool wear. |
[46] | Dry, MQL | 50 mL/h, 5-bar air pressure | N/A | Iron aluminum oil LRT 30 as lubricant mixed with air supplied from the compressor. | MQL significantly reduces tool wear compared to dry conditions. Dry machining resulted in high tool wear, particularly on the flank surface. In contrast, MQL exhibited lower wear values. MQL also consistently produced excellent surface finishes in various experimental tests due to reduced friction, lower cutting zone temperatures, and efficient chip removal. In MQL, helical-shaped chips with metallic and blue colors were formed, while dry machining produced helical- and ribbon-shaped chips with metallic and burnt blue colors. |
[35] | Dry, MQL | 50 mL/h, 6-bar air pressure, 15 deg nozzle angle | 200–240 m/min, 0.1 mm/rev, 0.25 mm | Vegetable-based. | Using synthetic oil as a cutting fluid resulted in improved performance at higher cutting speeds. When canola oil was used, it outperformed coconut oil and soybean oil in terms of tool life, tool wear, and surface roughness. However, the environmental advantages of canola oil require further investigation to explore its potential benefits for modern industries. |
[61] | MQL Nanofluid | 140 mL/h, 5-bar air pressure, 30 deg nozzle angle | 75–90 m/min, 0.04–0.12 mm/rev, 0.5–1.5 mm | Ethylene glycol as a base fluid with multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)nanoparticles. | The use of MQL with nanofluid is a viable alternative to traditional flood systems, provided it is applied correctly. This approach leads to significant enhancements in surface roughness and cutting force. |
[60] | MQL | 50–150 mL/h, 6-bar air pressure, 15 deg nozzle angle | 12,000–14,400 m/sec, 0, 1 mm/rev, 0.25 mm | Three vegetable-based cutting fluids of the edible oil category, viz: canola, coconut, and soybean oil. | MQL application results in smoother chips, indicating a substantial reduction in temperature. It also prevents built-up edge formation, achieves shorter contact lengths, and improves chip extraction, leading to reduced machining forces. Synthetic oil yields superior results compared to other cutting conditions. Among bio-cutting fluids, coconut oil performs better at higher cutting speeds than soybean and canola oil. |
[37] | Dry, MQL, MQL Nanofluid, MQL Nanofluid Hybrid | N/A | 60–100 m/min, 0.1–0.3 mm/rev, 0.2–0.4 mm | 0.3 wt% graphene nanofluid (Gr-nanofluid), 0.3 wt% copper nanofluid (Cu-nanofluid), and 0.3 wt% hybrid nanofluid (Hybrid Cu-Gr nanofluid) containing 0.15 wt% of graphene and 0.15 wt% of copper. | When machining AISI4340 with a cemented carbide tool, the least flank wear occurs after 20 min when using either graphene cutting fluid or hybrid Cu-Gr cutting fluid, resulting in a nearly 22% reduction compared to dry machining. In all experiments, the use of nanofluids lowers the cutting temperature at the machining zones compared to conventional cutting fluid. When machining AISI4340 at different cutting velocities, copper nanofluid exhibits the lowest cutting temperature at a velocity of 100 m/min, also resulting in a nearly 22% decrease compared to conventional cutting fluid. |
[62] | MQL Nanofluid | 4–5 bar | 100 m/min, 0.28 mm/rev, 0.3 mm | Coconut oil and graphene nanofluid mixture. | The experimental findings demonstrated that nanofluids outperformed pure coconut oil. Nano-Al2O3 combined with coconut oil produced a superior surface finish, lowered the cutting temperatures, and ensured minimum chip thickness. |
Overall findings | The pressure typically employed in minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) studies ranges from 1 to 6 bars, with flow rates below 200 mL/h. Biodegradable cutting fluids are predominantly utilized. Enhanced machinability, evidenced by reduced cutting forces and surface roughness, has been achieved under MQL conditions owing to lower cutting temperatures. Consequently, this has resulted in prolonged tool life compared to dry machining conditions. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Abdul Rahman, H.; Jouini, N.; Ghani, J.A.; Rasani, M.R.M. A Review of High-Speed Turning of AISI 4340 Steel with Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL). Coatings 2024, 14, 1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14081063
Abdul Rahman H, Jouini N, Ghani JA, Rasani MRM. A Review of High-Speed Turning of AISI 4340 Steel with Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL). Coatings. 2024; 14(8):1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14081063
Chicago/Turabian StyleAbdul Rahman, Haniff, Nabil Jouini, Jaharah A. Ghani, and Mohammad Rasidi Mohammad Rasani. 2024. "A Review of High-Speed Turning of AISI 4340 Steel with Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL)" Coatings 14, no. 8: 1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14081063
APA StyleAbdul Rahman, H., Jouini, N., Ghani, J. A., & Rasani, M. R. M. (2024). A Review of High-Speed Turning of AISI 4340 Steel with Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL). Coatings, 14(8), 1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14081063